Reverse calculation of tax in FI entry
Hi all,
We have a input tax code for service tax whiich is used for both PO/MIRO and FI entries(FB60).....which is maintained at tax classification level.......now i want to know how the system calculates service tax in case of FB60 (FI)entries based on tax code which i understand is a reverse calculation? FOR eg-
Expense-9075
Vendor-10000
ST basic-898
ST Ecess-18
ST S&H-9
Hi,
the system calculates the tax from the gross amount and deduct it from the gros amount and comes so to the net amount.
Regards
Tarik Oznalcin
Similar Messages
-
Reverse calculation of tax amount
Hi Experts,
Is it possible to calculate tax on reverse mode?
I will enter the total invoice amount, the system will calculate the unit price and tax amount.
How will it possible?
Regards,
Sanju M Sclosed...!
-
Hi Gurus,
I've decided to create this discussion because I couldn't find my solution as in previous thread :
F-47 not calculating Withholding Tax
I want to create posting with F-47 so that when I post with F-48 Withholding taxes will be deducted from the down payment.
Below are the configuration in the system :
1. Wh tax is defined as invoice only (not at payment).
2. Extended wh tax is active and already assigned to company code with validity period still active
3. Field status variant in OB41 for posting key 29, 39, 31, for taxes wh tax code and wh amount are opt. entry
4. Field status variant in OB14 for field status group G026, G067, and those related to my recon account for wh tx code and wh amount are opt. entry
When I post with normal invoice FB60, the wh tax is calculated, but when using DP request or special gl down payment, the wh tax is not calculated, SAP gives message "Withholding tax information is missing from the line item.
I have also check and apply solution in notes 1626838 - WT pop up not appear, but all of them is not solving my issue.
I need to activate withholding tax with spc gl, Is there any steps that I missing ?
Thank you.Hi
Please see below path for config
Defined Tax type
Tax code for Payment tax type
assign to company code
Assoign GL code for both Invoice and payment Withholding tax .
many Thanks -
Error in w.tax while posting entry in f-53
Hi All,
When i'm trying to post payment to vendor in f-53 i got the following error when i selected the line item among the displayed items
" With holding tax key missing one of following entry.
Please help me out as i need to solve this on urgent basis
Regards
ReddyHello friend '
Please follow the steps,
1. spro-fin. acc new - Fin a/c global settings(new)-withholding tax-extended withholding tax-calculation-withholding tax code-define withholding tax code.
2. select your w.tax type and w.tax code .
3. double click the selection.
4. Check whether you have entered the w.tax key in the field "Off. W.Tax key."
Regards
Pradeep Vasu -
Calculation of Tax Depreciation - India
Hi,
We are following the New GL Accounting setup to our US based client in India.
My Leading Ledger (US) is Jan u2013 Dec and Non-leading Ledger (India) is April u2013 March.
We also created different Fiscal Year variants (Year Dependent) as S1 and IN for both the Co codes.
I have defined and activated Non-leading ledger for India Company code.
All the transactions were posting correctly as per Leading and Non-leading ledgers except Tax Depreciation in Fixed Assets.
I was able to post correct depreciation for India Company Act Depreciation area with a stated percentage. But the Tax depreciation area calculation is incorrect.
Required Depreciation Calculation for Tax Depreciation Area as below:
For Acquires & Additions:
Rule1: If it is >=180 days (as per Non-leading ledger Fiscal year) the system should calculate depreciation as stated percentage. Eg: 10%
Rule2:
If it is <180 days (as per Non-leading ledger Fiscal year) the system should calculate depreciation of 50% on stated percentage. Eg: Stated percentage is 10%, then it should be 5%.
I already copied India standard setting IT & NL to my fiscal year variant in Calender assignments of Period controls. But when I tried to post the Tax Depreciation in the month of March as per Non-leading ledger, the system is calculating full Depreciation as per Rule1 instead of 50% of stated Percentage in Rule2.
Can any one of you kindly advice how to setup the Multi levels methods and Period controls for Tax Depreciation key in Indian Tax Depreciation area as per above requirement. I have been working on this since one week. Please help me.
Thanks for the help.
Regards,
JBCI am not sure if this work.. but give it a try.
In your multi-level method line 1 put Acq yr = 9999, Year = 999, Per = 6, Percent = 50
line 2 put Acq yr = 9999, Year = 999, Per = 12, Percent = 10
Now what i dont understand from your question is that is this rule for the first acquisition year only?
If so, also try with Acq yr = 9999, Year = 1 (so only the first acq yr will get calculated based on the percentage).
Try this in your sandbox and let me know if it works or not!! -
Calculation of tax with two conditions
hi all,
i have an issue regarding tax in condition in po.
i want the calculation of tax should be on two condition basis, while i am giving value in tax code field in invoice tab.
1. when i am entering tax code, the value like- L1- 4%, L2- 12%, that is calculating on gross price.
supose- GP- 100
tax- 4%- 4
104
then am puting fright charge- 10
so total is 114
2. supose- GP- 100
fright - 10
110
then a will calculate- 4% on 110
how this could be done, the 2nd one.
thanks®ards
susantaHi,
For this you have to treat Freight as a Discount Condition Type in MM Pricing
Take a copy of RA01 in M/06 and keep it as Positive Condition
Here keep
Cond. class A Discount or surcharge
Calculat.type A Percentage
Cond.category Blank
And Plus/minus - A (Positive)
Use this in Pricing Procedure (M/08) after Gross Price ad Discount conditions (before Subtotal)
Now
Base Price = 100
Freight = 10
Subtotal = 110
Tax (4%) = on Subtotal -
Disable auto-calculation of tax amount by Autoinvoices to import AR Invoice
Hi all,
I am using ra_interface_lines_all to do AR Invoices conversion to Oracle R12. My legacy invoices data contains tax amount and some of the invoices do not have any tax. Autoinvoice auto-calculated tax information during import even for those invoices that have no tax.
I checked my AR interface record and made sure none of the tax-related columns (e.g. tax_code, tax_amount, etc) are populated. I also checked the AR transaction source for conversion and make sure tax-calculation flag is not set.
Basically I need to set the tax amounts manually instead of letting the system to derive it. Some suggested to set tax_exempt_flag to "E". I tried but Autoinvoice complained that I need to have tax reason and besides I have many invoices that have tax amounts.
Any suggestions on disable the auto-calculation of tax?
Thanks! MikeHi Mike,
U r using transaction types to generate your distributions, right?
Try to insert distribution info for each of your invoices in the table ra_interface_distributions_all, specifying REC, REV and TAX (tax where applicable) lines.
Hope this will solve your prob.
Vik -
Changing base for calculation of Tax
Hi All,
SAP standard delivers 0001 condition type in Tax calculation procedure as base for calculation of Tax. condition type 0001 picks up 0PR0 as base for calcualtion of tax. Can someone tell me how does system picks up 0PR0 as base for calculation of tax as i have to change the base of calculation.
Any hint would be a great help.I think I had the cart before the horse on this problem. The correct way to look at this is what is the best way to get the correct "Net Book Value" and not the correct tax depreciation posting as it never actually gets booked.
By knowing the incorrect Beginning BV, the rate depreciation is applied in year 1 and finally the desired Net BV value at the end of year 1 for tax purposes I am able to calculate the correct Unplanned Depreciation for tax to make everything work out correctly.
correct beginning tax BV $1,200
Beginning Asset Book Value $1,800
depreciation $360 (20% of BV)
Unplanned depreciation $?
Net BV for tax at end of Yr1 $960 ; or 1,200 - (1,200*.2)
With the know values above that makes my unplanned depreciation for Yr 1 to be $480. Year 1 and all following years depreciate correctly after the Unplanned Depreciation is posted.
I am marking this as resolved unless someone sees an error in my thinking.
Thanks,
Jeff -
In MIRO screen, if clicked on 'TAX' tab error 'Entry of tax not allowed in
Hi,
In MIRO screen, if clicked on 'TAX' tab error 'Entry of tax not allowed in current account line' is displayed. Message number FF847. What may be the reason for this error message?
Entry of tax not allowed in current account line
Message no. FF847
Diagnosis
If you enter a tax amount in the current account line, the system does not allocate the amount to one tax code, but instead to all tax codes that exist in the document. In this case, the amount needs to be split up using the rule-of-three procedure. The sum of the computed taxes of all tax codes is used as the comparison basis. If each of the computed tax amounts of all tax codes equals zero, the system uses the sum of the tax base values as the comparison basis.
System Response
If the respective comparison basis equals zero, the system issues an error message.
Procedure
Go to the tax screen or tax tab page and enter the appropriate tax amounts for each tax code.Hi,
Please check SAP Note- 1551857 for the same.
Other terms
FF707, FF716, FF796, FF847, FB70, SAPLTAX1
Reason and Prerequisites
There is a program error.
Solution
Implement the program corrections.
When you choose "Cancel" on the tax screen during posting or simulation, the system returns to FB60 or MIRO again.
The message FF 847 on the "Basic data" tab page is suppressed for company codes with jurisdiction codes if no expense items exist.
Hope this will resolve your query.
Regards,
Sandesh Sawant -
Surcharge (x% on the calculated business tax)
HI All,
Happy new year to all.
I am new SD module i am basically BI consultant, now i am doing the SD implementation project.
based on below scenario i have create new condition type.
can any one help me.
1. tax example
Business tax
Transportation 3 %
Other Services 5 %
Surcharge (x% on the calculated business tax)
Example:
Transportation 1000 Yuan
Business tax (3%) 30 Yuan
Surcharge (e.g. 10%) 3 Yuan
Packets Domestic 1000 Yuan
Business tax (5%) 50 Yuan
Surcharge (e.g. 10%) 5 Yuan
Business tax and surcharge will be displayed on the invoice in two separate lines.
New Tax conditions type need to be customized.
Attributes to determine the tax rate:
· Tax classification customer
· Tax classification material
Thanks,
kumarpDear Kumar,
As per my under stand, while u create Sales order time 3 condition types u want
If my assumption right?
First u need to main pricing procedure, in that maintain condition types with from, to
For Eg:
S.No-Condition typeFrom-----To
10-------Transportation
20----
Business Tax
30--Surcharge--
20
Like this way u want main pricing procedure, this calculation reflect in sales order.
Second one is u maintain condition records, Here maintain with percentage.
If u maintain like this after sales order, billing u will get three separate lines.
If any think wrong just tell me.
Thanks
Satya -
Calculation of taxes on condition types
hi team,
I am using different condition types in my calculation schema. whenever lumpsum amounts are fed in the system, like Discount/Quantity, Absolute discount, Header Disc.(Value), Header Surch.(Value), Pack & Forward-Value, Pack & Forward- Qty, Freight/Quantity, Freight (Value), LC/Bank Charges(Val), Entry Tax/Octroi(V) Road Tax (Value), Registration Fees(V), Miscellaneous(Value) & Miscellaneos/Quntity, are independent of each other on which tax etc should not be calculated.
My client is inserting these values including tax. so, he dont want cascading effect on these values.
he wants only those values with % should have cascading effect.
how to confiure the same in calculation schema.
my schema currently is having cascading effect.
thanks
satishany updates.
-
Wrong Calculation of Tax Amount
Hi to All,
While making Down Payment Request (F-47) with reference capital PO, system is showing a warning message as below:
Tax entered incorrect (code FU, amount 45,766.25), correct 36,882.24 INR
Message no. FF707
Diagnosis
The system checks the tax amounts for each code on document level. However, the amounts entered deviate more from the amount calculated (using the percentage rates defined in the tax code) than is allowed considering rounding errors.
Procedure
If this message is a warning message, you can confirm that your entry is correct by pressing "Continue".
If this message is an error message, you should correct the tax amounts or the base amounts, depending on how your tax code is defined.
For more clarity: whatever the tax code is in PO same tax code giving in F-47. But in both scenarios system calculating differently.
what could be the reason? Please guide me?
Regards,
SchilukuriHi SDNer,
Thanks for your reply.
As you said, In PO system does not calculate tax based on the tax code,it will calculate based on the pricing procedure.
Now my doubt is whatever the tax amount is showing in PO that we need to enter in to F-47,But here system is showing
(Tax entered incorrect (code FU, amount 45,766.25), correct 36,882.24 INR).
Now what should I do? Please help me on this..
Regards,
Schilukuri -
Calculation of Tax Amount in FB60
Hi Guru's,
Here Tax Procedure is TAXINN in which I have maintain Tax Code V9 as 14.42% (EXCISE+CESS) + 12.5% (VAT) in FV11. So while doing MIRO I select V9 Tax code then automatically Tax amount is calculated.
My question is can same can done in FB60. Means can Tax amount can automatically calculated in FB60 when I selecting V9 as Tax Code which was calculated in MIRO.
I needed for transaction without Purchase Order.
Right answer will be rewarded.
Regards
AmitThnks for reply.
I have already done the customization in OB40 but when i do invoice posting in FB60 then error shows "Tax Code V9 does not exist in TAXINN".
But since in MIRO same Tax code get posted with same vendor.
Pls help me.
Regards -
Calculation of Tax Issue from FB60 (Tax Code Issue)
Dear All,
Normally when we purchase or received any services we post following entry.
INVOICE VALUE IS 1000
Purchase Ac Dr 1000
To Vendor 900
T o Tax 100
But our requirement is that
Purchase Ac Dr 1100
To Vendor 1000
T o Tax 100
System should add cost of TAX in purchase instead of reduction form vendor balance as we have to give 1000 RS to vendor.
Can we create TAX code in this manner.
This is not even possible form function available in Edit Option in FB60 (Calculate tax on Net Amount)
Not even from TDS (Withholding tax)
WE CANu2019T SUGGEST POSTING JV IN THAT CASE.
Regards,
BittuApologized for that Atif.
Withholding Tax Type does not control Vendor line item.
My issue is that system should not reduce value enter in vendor amount field.
System usually reduce amount which is payable to vendor
Please see my example once again. I also mention that it is not working from Withholding Tax nor form Tax code(FTXP)
Edit option in FB60 is also not useful in this case.
Regards, -
Calculation of tax via tax code
Dears,
There are some concepts about the pricing in PO that I never got it clear. I really appriciate it if someone can help me.
1. What is the base amount for calculate the tax via tax code?
In the invoice verification there often is a tax code in which a tax rate is decided. But what is the base amount of the tax? How does the system get the base amount from all kinds of conditions from purchase order? Does it related to the configuration in the condition type, or in the calculation schema?
I looked into the tax code configuration to find the base amount condition type as BASB without any access sequence. and for India there is a basetype 362 in the pricing schema. I can not understand the code in routine 362, and for example there even isn't a basetype in China. Then how does the system get the proper amount for calculate the tax?You can create the Reg Info with the Plant and this message will not happens...
Maybe you are looking for
-
I am interested in upgrading from my Nikon D2x to the new Nikon D3. At the moment I work with CS2 and have a few budget restraints. I would like to know if I can open the Nikon D3 Camera Raw/NEF files with my present version of Photoshop CS2? Thank y
-
In creative cloud the apps arent working what should ido
please help
-
Forte C++:error: Multiple Declaration for std::exception
Hi, I am trying to compile code written in C++ 4.2/solrais 2.6 with Forte 6 C++ compiler on Solaris 7. Getting the following error. /opt/SUNWspro/WS6/include/CC/exception.h Line 17: Multiple Declaration for std::exception. Tried running only the prep
-
Latest Firmware for WRT54GS 5.1
Hello I have a WRT54GS 5.1, when connecting to the router it states that the current firmware version is 1.52.2. I want to be able to use VPN client (Mac OS X VPN Tracker) with this router. I heard that some Linksys Routers (god knows why) mess up VP
-
Query result is not match with selection
Dear experts I have a infoobject X which have attribute Y In my query, I use infocube and I set X and Y as selection When I run the query, if I fill Y with 1 value, and X with 10 values, Only 1 value of X appear in the result of the report (Not 10 va