Revoke Billing from WBS.

Hi all,
I am facing a problem looking for your help.
I have a WBS element which is marked as Billing WBS, This WBS was assign to SO and billing plan was exist against it. Project is in release status. Now I want to change it back to act assgn only (need to remove billing flag) from WBS. To achieve same I have removed billing plan from SO as well as remove WBS from SO line id. Revoke "order accepted" status. But still I can not able to change its billing indicator.
I could not able to figure out what is wrong? I will not agree to statement that after project is release we cannot change billing indicator (as this is totally wrong).
Can some one please help me out to let me know what I am missing out?

once you have disconnected the sales order
run CJEN for the project

Similar Messages

  • £750 bill from Vodafone as iPhone sent 20GB last month, please help!

    Hi
    I have just received a shock data bill from vodafone. Apparently my iPhone has been using between 500 MB - 1GB a day for the last month.
    I have had the phone for almost 18 months and cannot work out why this has suddenly happened. I have not downloaded a new app or changed my usage at all.
    I checked the phone and it states that it has sent 20.7 GB of data, and received 1.7 since last reset (October).
    I only use the phone for calls, texts, and social networking. I have wifi at home and barely use cellular data.
    I contacted Vodafone as I wish to dispute the bill (I am happy to pay for what I have used, but I cannot see how I have used this!)
    They state that if I can show it is a software issue, they will write off the £750. At first they suggested I send it to them and they would check if it was software or a fault, until they realised it was out of warranty, then they said they can't look at it unless I pay £150.
    They suggested giving apple a call, but I looked on website and to call them will be £25 and I am not sure if it will resolve the issue.
    What can I do? The phone is still on iOS 6.0, I realise the data issue could possibly be resolved by updating, but am reluctant to do this before the phone is checked out (if I can get apple to check it out). For the time being I have restricted all data to wifi.
    Is it likely to be a fault/software issue? I have not sent any files anywhere etc. If I drive to my nearest apple store (at least an hour away) will they look at it/are they likely to help/admit it is software and give me some proof for vodafone?
    Please help!!

    Contact the Apple store directly (or Verizon) as Apple (nor Verizon for that matter) monitor these forums.

  • Error while doing settlement from WBS to P&L Account

    Hello
    I am trying to do a settlement from WBS to P&L Account(Expense account). In this case, "Dummy" Prof Ctr is getting derived from 0KE5 (we have maintained a dummy prof ctr). We have set the validations to disallow any postings/settlements to dummy prof ctr. Hence I am getting an error while doing settlement.
    Now I am maintaning a Prof ctr in my WBS master data. I am unable to understand why system is deriving dummy prof ctr and not the one maintained on WBS master data. The settlements are working fine when I do them against Balance sheet accounts and proper prof ctr is getting derived, which is being maintained on WBS master data. I am getting trouble only while doing settlement to my P&lL i.e. expense accounts.
    can anyone throw some light on this?
    Thks
    Sarang

    Dear Sarang,
    You have maintained profit center in WBS master which is not updated at the time settlement to FI that what makes you worried. If you are making FI posting and give WBS as an additional account assignment then Profit center in WBS master will be updated. Here in settlement WBS is sender not the receiver so that profit center will not be updated. In settlement receiver (any) is debited and sender (WBS) is credited so this credit entry will be updated in profit center.
    To your second query that when you carry out settlement to balance sheet account right profit center is updated then please make sure, that balance sheet account is maintained in 3KEH with profit center or OKB9.
    Your P&L account (expense) receives dummy profit center because it is not able to find cost center which can fetch profit center from the master. So, if you can afford, maintain that cost elements (expense account) with profit center in OKB9.
    might help you..........................................................

  • Secondary costs from WBS to an AuC

    Hi,
    1. I have executed Assessment[KSU5] that actually settled costs from secondary cost element[800099] to a WBS element [AAA]
    2. Now I am trying to settle costs [which is secondary] from WBS element [AAA] to an AuC using CJ88 and I am getting below error
    3. Just for info in allocation structure Z1, I have given settlement cost element for WBS, but still I am getting below error
    Any advises/ideas, thanks
    Complete allocation structure Z1
    Message no. KD503
    Diagnosis
    During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
    Cost element 800099 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure Z1, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
    Procedure
    Possible solutions are as follows:
    If the posting under cost element 800099 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
    If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
    a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.
    If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
    You can update allocation structure Z1
    Regards,
    Sri
    Edited by: Sridhar Nagavarapu on Jul 4, 2008 12:45 AM
    Edited by: Sridhar Nagavarapu on Jul 4, 2008 12:47 AM

    Through MM, contract is created (ME31N) whereby the settlement G/L accounts are identified.
    The contract then is released through MM with TCode ME21N which prompts Commitment Costs to be entered, after which the Service Entry Sheet SES through TCode ME81L which then automatically updates into the WBS.
    Through WBS, CJ88 would be the TCode you would have to use for settlement.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks.

  • WBS element is updated while settling cost from WBS to AUC

    Hi Experts
    At the time of settlement , when we settling the cost from WBS to AUC , WBS element is updated in AUC line item of accounting document , but it should not be updated actually.
    As result AUC cost is loaded on WBS and budget of WBS is get affected , furthermore system is not allowing for MIGO even budget is available but in CJ30 it is showing assigned value is more then original budget.
    Please suggest.
    Thanks & Regards
    shailesh

    Hi Saurabh ,
    I totally agree with you , but in our case system is not allowing(Error Message: Budget Exceeded) MIGO against capex PO - > WBS.
    Note : in our case , system is checking budget at the time of MIGO also.
    in our case , report  S_ALR_87013558 is showing wrong actual value and  also in CJ30 , total assigned value is larger then total distributable budget , As result our available budget gets negative figure in report S_ALR_87013558 , even i have already run CJEN->CJBN 2 or 3 times.
    Note: Our Commitment value is correct.
    Actually , according to report S_ALR_87013542 , system is showing correct actual value , that means we have sufficient available budget for further MIGO's
    Now may be , due to WBS element is updated in AUC line item of accouning document of settlement (WBS to AUC) , system loads AUC values to WBS unnecessarily , our available budget gets negative figure.
    For your reference , i am attaching screen shot of accounting document which is generated at the time of settlement from WBS to AUC.

  • I am receiving bills from my carrier with very high data usage. I read books from apple store. Do ibooks use gb once purchased?

    I am receiving bills from my carrier with very high data usage. I read books from apple store. Do ibooks use gb once purchased?

    To reduce data usage, you should put iPad on Aeroplane Mode to stop all background activities when not using iPad.
    Message was edited by: Diavonex

  • Firefox want download any bills from vodafone site

    I have been trying to download and reprint my bills from vodafone and the link want open.... I have allowed it access when popups asked, but it still want download.
    Vodafone say I must use internet explorer and will only support internet explorer.
    I have only had this problem in the last few months

    Hi Joe, some other users have reported that the Real Downloader is not working in Firefox 22. If you have updated it and it still doesn't work, you might consider using a different downloader. I don't have any personal recommendations on that, but you can check out the reviews on the add-ons site:
    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/

  • How to revoke everything from a user when opening a new session.

    HI,
    I am using oracle 10g Express Edition and SQL Developer.
    I have 2 user, 2 database connections in my SQL Developer.
    First user is Oracle and its database connection is called TCF.
    Second user is SMITH and its database connection is called TCF_SMITH.
    Oracle user has privileges to do anything.
    SMITH user has no privileges except for CREATE SESSION.
    What I am trying to achieve is assign a user to a role (this role will have grants to select, insert , update from tables) for the current session (this step is successful), and then revoke
    The role from that user (set it back to its default/or revoke everything from it) if opening another session, or session has been terminated (what I am trying to achieve).
    From TCF I was able to do the following:
    CREATE synonym SMITH.EMP_IOD FOR EMP_IOD;
    CREATE ROLE TCF_I;
    GRANT SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE ON EMP_IOD TO TCF_I;
    GRANT TCF_I TO SMITH;In TCF_SMITH
    SMITH has the same privileges as TCF_I.
    so, smith now can select, insert , and update from EMP_IOD table.
    If I open another TCF_SMITH session, and select * from EMP_IOD I should not be able to see any of the records.
    I am trying to make this session base only. Unfortunately when opening another session I am able to select, update and insert records in the new session.
    Is there a way to make this session based ?
    How can I revoke everything from user SMITH from TCF connection ?
    Thanks,

    Oh My Good Lord!
    Rooney,
    What are you attempting to do ?
    In programming anything can be achieved, but there are speicifc tools to solve specific problems .
    I think you are trying to use fork to paint a wall* (If painting the wall indeed is your requirement).
    The "need" as you say...
    +The need for this is to grant the user different roles each time the user logs in.
    for example I can log in 5 different time in one week with different role each time.
    Moday I could have access to X,Y,Z,
    Tuesday I could have access to X,A,B
    Wednesday I could have access to A,B,C.+
    ... is to solve WHAT PROBLEM?
    Please describe your original requirement , not what you think should be the solution/tool to satisfy the requirement.
    In your previous thread you "solved" privilege/role problem by creating SYNONYM. That does not compute at all.
    Re: database roles seems like its not working for me - your help is appreciated
    Think about it. We are here to help each other as best we can.
    Please read more* about Oracle capabilities and "tools" it provides.
    http://tahiti.oracle.com/
    Especially the Oracle Concepts Guide ...
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B14117_01/server.101/b10743.pdf
    Also, please take time to respond as "helpfully" as possible. each response from you should take you closer to the solution.
    Hopefully, your original requirement will be solved.
    vr,
    Sudhakar B.

  • Fields copied to AUC from WBS Element (when WBS Element is released)

    Hi,
    I would like to know what are the fields that are copied to AUC from WBS element (when WBS Element is released).
    Regards,
    Vivian

    Hi Vivian,
    menu path: Asset Accounting / Valuation / Determine Depreciation Areas in the Asset Class
    Select there your asset under construction asset class.
    Here you can fill in default values. (when you click on the fields you get more fields)
    When you want to fill in other fields you can use a substitution ( Asset Accounting / Master Data / Define Substitution)
    In our case, i think standard
    The field description (WBS)
    Req cost center (WBS)
    Plant (WBS)
    BA  (WBS)

  • Secondary cost from WBS to AUC

    Hi All,
    I am facing a problem in posting secondary costs from WBS to AUC.
    In Project systems they are considering secondary costs from the activities in the network. i settled the cost from network to WBS. and when i tried to settle From wbs to AUC system is asking for settlement costelement for secondary cost. But the secondary cost should be settled to costcenter but not to AUC.
    Please suggest how can we do the settlement from WBS to AUC. How to handle settlement of secondary costs in this scenario.
    Any help will be greatly appriciated.
    Rgds,
    Kumar.

    Through MM, contract is created (ME31N) whereby the settlement G/L accounts are identified.
    The contract then is released through MM with TCode ME21N which prompts Commitment Costs to be entered, after which the Service Entry Sheet SES through TCode ME81L which then automatically updates into the WBS.
    Through WBS, CJ88 would be the TCode you would have to use for settlement.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks.

  • TEM Billing from different companies

    Hi all
    We recently split our operations into two separate companies.  We created a new enterprise structure (new company codes, new sales organisations and new cost centres) and logically split all operations to operate according to this new set up (i.e. there used to be one company, now we have company A and company B operating on the same SAP instance).
    We did this setup while we were still on version 4.6C.  One of the problems we faced is that we are using Billing for Training and Event Management.  We now had to cater for billing for training from both companies depending on who offers which course.  In the configuration for billing there is only one sales organisation that can be set up.  In 4.6C we overcame this problem by allocating a specific cost centre number to the Event Type.  This cost centre belonged to one or the other sales organisation and therefore we managed to successfully bill from the two different companies.
    We recently upgraded to ECC6 and this scenario no longer works.  When you debug transaction PV17, it assigns the sales organisation specified in the configuration and completely ignores the fact that you have assigned a different cost centre from a different sales organisation to that training event type.
    I would like to know how I can bill for different training events from different companies.  Any ideas will be most welcomed!
    Regards
    Liezl

    Hi
    Herewith an update:
    You need to maintain infotype 1037 of the business event type (Billing/Activity Allocation) with the appropriate sales organisation and distribution channels.
    This then allows you to bill from different companies.
    Regards
    Liezl

  • Bill from CMR Claims in Oklahoma City, OK

    We have a case just like one in another thread where I nicked our Vierizon Fios line because it was only buried two inches deep in an unexpected place across the middle of our back yard.  When I called Verizon Service about it they assured me that there was no fee for the repair.  Verizon came out and repaired it on May 8th and now over two months later I got a bill from CMR Claims for $168.  If we had known they would charge us that we wouldn't have bothered having it repaired and would have just switched internet providers.
    No one at Verizon even knows about this bill and cannot help me, I was transferred all over the place.  Gene at CMR Claims says there is no requirement for phone cables to be buried, they could just lay on top of the ground.  If they had laid it on top of the grould I would have at least seen it!  Who is this company and are they even affiliated with Verizon? Can anyone put me in touch with someone at Verizon who can help get this resolved?
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    I have read several forum posts where people appear to have the same issue that I do.
    I received a bill from CMR Claims Department in Oklahoma City for $240.94 for a "DROP WIRE". I was billed for "VERIZON COST TO REPAIR" with no detail, no hours of work and no explanation of the bill.
    The Verizon Tech who decided to replace my wire NEVER said anything about any possible charges. He just said that it would be best to replace the fault wire to ensure I could get coninues service.
    QUESTION:
    1) Why did not the Tech informathat the repair would come with a cost. 
    2) How can I be billed afterwards for work that I have not authorized or approved?
    3) Why do I receive a bill directly from Verizon's 3rd party vendor, CMT. I am a FIOS subscriber and expect to deal directly with Verizon - not your vendors...
    I tried Technical Support, who sent me to the Billing Department, who said they would investigate and that where we are now.
    Someone please help,
    >TM

  • Item level billing from contract

    Hi Friends,
    I have a service contract with two line items. Periodic billingis activated for this contract.When I crate a billing doc with reference to the contract using T.code VF04 both the line items in the contract will come into billing doc.
    My requirement is that user should be able to select for what ever the line item he wants to bill from the contract. Is there any T.code OR any way I can select the line items from contract to bill.
    Thanks ,
    Ashok S

    Hello Ashok,
    If you use T code VF01, then you have an option to select Billing items.
    After entering contract no in VF01 screen.----on top right hand side there is a tab of of Selection List having green page symbol on it.
    Press this tab and select line item accordingly to invoice.
    Revert if not resolved.
    Regards
    Amit

  • Direct Billing from Delivery Document?

    Hi Team,
    We were using and a order to billing process so far. Here once the SO ins created from the SO i had the option to do direct billing.
    By which the vf01 will be open with the invoice details.
    Now i am implementing a order- delivery - billing.
    Here the delivery document is ready however i am unable to view the option to do billing from this document. Hence i have to go vf01 and create the billing.
    Can you help me explore how to do direct billing from Delivery document if its possible or do i have to create another doc like Billing request for attaining thia.
    Regards,
    Rajneesh

    Hi ,
    Alike billing VA02, there is no option triggering billing for delivery related billing process.
    Either you need to go transaction VF01 (online process) or VF04 ( back ground/online) collective process.
    The same VF04 also useful for order related billing (multiple doc.)
    The reason is here is We can create delivery from sales to delivery  with N:1 relation
    Also same applies to sales/delivery doc to Billing .
    In delivery we need to different process after creation of delivery documnet as per business requirement besidess compulsory picking/ goods issue
    Thanks
    Chidambaram

  • How do I make a consecutive 90 suspension without billing from Thailand?

    I am in Thailand for 5 months.  Before I left I suspended the service for 90 day maximum.  I now need to make a suspension consecutive for another 90 days without billing.  There is no mechanism online for a second suspension request without reconnection first. Reconnection is done online or automatic.   There is no way to communicate to Verizon from Thailand in any form.  I can not stop from being unsuspended at end of 90 days and no way to request second suspension without billing from Thailand.

    Yes and no.  In my experience, I had to wait until the line reconnected automatically and then resuspend it.  Since it resulted in the line being connected for a day, there was a charge on my next bill, but since it was pro-rated for just one day, the charge wasn't much.

Maybe you are looking for