RGB vs. CMYK Colorspace - Which is best to work in?

I'm designing a document for a client, within in InDesign. Up until my last save, I've been ignoring the notice about InDesign being set in the RGB colorspace. On my last save, I changed it to the CMYK colorspace and all my linked images got lighter (some not in a good way). I understand the difference, but my question is - for sending this to print, what is the standard colorspace that most printers use? Should I be designing in the CMYK colorspace or RGB?
Also, when I edit my photos, I switch back and forth between modes to get the best results, but what is the best mode to save them in - RGB or CMYK? I've heard conflicting answers.
I realize that printers print in CMYK and while it would make sense to save photos and InDesign docs in CMYK, I've heard people say it's best to save in RGB. Please help. If you could also please explain your answer, just so I can gain the knowledge on this subject and understand why I'm doing what I'm doing.
I should also mention that I'm working in CS3, but I save to a PDF from CS5.

InDesign by default is set in the CMYK colorspace which is what most people  who use InDesign would need. The only way to set InDesign into RGB is to declare your document intent as "web" which is a bad idea for any document that you might eventually print. If you know from the get-go you will be printing your document, set InDesign to the print intent. If you are designing for the web, set it up in RGB (web intent).
As for your images, I used to convert them to my CMYK profile early on and work that way but changed my methods a few years back as Photoshop has less editing options for CMYK images. My advice would be to keep the photo's/images in RGB until you are ready to send the document to print, then convert to your CMYK profile - IF sending to a conventional 4 color print press. If you are sending to a digital printer (including desktops), it matters less about converting to CMYK.
Of course you could keep the images in RGB anyway and let InDesign (or the PDF export) convert them all to the same CMYK profile but you might see color shifts, as you have been experiencing. By converting them yourself in Photoshop before you send to print, you see the changes and can adjust accordingly.

Similar Messages

  • Rgb or cmyk is there a gain/advantage working on photos?

    Hi
    i use almost every time RGB
    but now i'm thinking if there is a gain/advantage using CMYK in photo editing
    well i don't know
    is there a gain  advantage  in the CMYK ?
    if yes , why and when ?
    thanks
    have a great day

    There is absolutely nothing to be gained.
    CMYK has a more limited colour gamut than RGB and is intended for images that are to be printed on a printing press where the colours are also restricted.
    To all intents and purposes you can forget CMYK.

  • Smart Objects: RGB inside CMYK

    Just two days before completing a two week job the client decided (still dont know why) the job had to be delivered with open layers on CMYK.
    After two weaks and 6 jobs and hundred of layers latter had almost all work done..in RGB. I started to panic thinking of the time I would waste just appling curves,levels,etc... to every layer,while keeping things open if they wanted last minute changes.
    Thats when it struck me..why not leaving everything as it was (RGB) and convert it to a smart object and then convert the parrent file to CMYK?
    I has suprised how it works just fine.In the end the client agreed it was better to keep things as they were,but it sounds a really nice possibility and to some extend makes perfect sense as one would retain the full Gamut of RGB (AdobeRGB or any other) and could convert to proper CMYK acording to needs.
    As anyone experienced this?

    Mark -
    There are a few gross errors in Photoshop that are seen as bugs, but go uncorrected for years due to the amount of work needed to fix them - not to mention - get it worked into the correction cycle in development.  Marketing is steering the train.  Go think about that oxymoron for a few weeks...
    ;o)
    One major problem is the conundrum of being able to open an untagged file, assign a color space, then look at it. That in itself is counter intuitive and basically a HUGE hole in the application with respect to color management. With the new proposed architecture of creating the entire application Smart Photoshop - You not only eliminate this issue, but also have created a new and improved workflow  - integrating source color images into the working space, tagged or untagged, with consistency for all. Adobe products are now far and wide enough to have the majority rule, so why not capitalize on it and implement a global workflow.  This logic works for many industries Adobe serves. From 2d, 3d to motion video, cell phone, bio medical, and who knows what's next. It's image history preservation in its simple form.
    In English, whittle down 9 options to 2 for color policies and change the logic between RGB and CMYK file handling. Convert to working space.  Have the working space 32 bit Pro Photo RGB. Files flow into it as well as color space conversions. Now remember, this is a choice feature and not a force fit. It's a marketing born inception that caters to the masses for best practice. If you want to work outside that environment, its your choice, but it's not advisable unless you are resurrecting trash, re-assigning really bad pictures, or it does not work for your requirement and a new additional per-dim needs to be created.  I'm offering a choice.  Two choices to be specific. Road or off road travel. For here now, and tomorrow. It's a creature of growth, just like the implementation of Smart Objects that has morphed more possibilities as well as options.  But Smart Objects is a representation of Adobe's expanded free for all mentality to push the envelope of development for market share. My advice is to back on the whizz bang wow factor and get some damn control of the features grained in deep rooted experience from power users....
    Smart Photoshop is needed because users are not getting it Gentleman and Ladies. Expecting most users to become geeks is not going to happen. It's a given from a marketing stand point, but they refuse to see how to address it for one reason or another. Maybe too busy dealing with the company merge and product integration. Im pretty sure its quite an undertaking, but its time to make the best - better....
    I remember Bruce Fraser talking about Chris and Thomas wanting 12 ish choices for color policies fearing too much restrain for growth. Thank you Bruce for 9, but my friend, we need even less.... Smart Photoshop gives 2 choices. Structure or Chaos. Right now we only have chaos.  My vote is to have uniformity with very little user understanding and awareness. That's good implementation.  The software has to become intelligent people.....
    I'm game.  Who has balls here?
    nice to see ur pair Rich.

  • Best Practice RGB to CMYK ?

    Can some of you guys that work with print, point me at a decent link for a best practice workflow going from RGB to CMYK?   This is for outputting a large graphic that contains a number of RGB colour photographs, for imput into Indesign, and export to PDF for print in a newspaper advert.  I have the paper's requirements.  The job in question is not colour critical, but I would like to feel better informed.

    Trevor,
    CMYK is a darned narrow color mode, even narrower than the  sRGB profile. 
    Of course you're bound to see some of your RGB colors just die in your image during the conversion.  That is the nature of the beast, and that's where soft-proofing with the target profile comes to the rescue, partially, by letting you fine tune the colors to compensate (somewhat).
    Just look at all those greens, blues and reds outside of the CMYK spectrum.

  • Best results when changing RGB to CMYK

    Hi There,
    How can I get the best results when converting a RGB to CMYK? For example, a tif visual when offset printing... Is there any programme, plug in, machine for this?
    Many thanks

    I agree with Marco U.
    I might have said: only use Perceptual if an extremely important color in a photo changes terribly using Relative Colorimetric -- otherwise use that. The reason: The former method can make the whole picture shift (usually yellower and weaker) but the latter can make several distinctly different colors (like 3-5 different reds for example) and make them the same. Usually, one or two really strong colors can get shifted somewhat, but won't be noticeable in an otherwise great looking image.
    The secret to converting for good print color is to choose the source and target correctly.
    If you are serious about color, buy the book "Real World Color Management" by Bruce Fraser, Chris Murphy and Fred Bunting.
    http://www.amazon.com/Real-World-Color-Management-2nd/dp/0321267222/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF 8&s=books&qid=1198178251&sr=1-1
    Sadly, Bruce Fraser passed away, so the book may not go to a third edition.But you can still get the second edition and the first 5 or 6 chapters are an education in themselves.

  • Which versions of photoshop can convert rgb to cmyk?

    Hi all, I'm needing to convert high quality graphics from rgb to cmyk for publication and I'm trying to figure out which version of photoshop I should get for the job. I know that photoshop elements does not have the rgb to cmyk function, but am unsure otherwise. In particular, I'm looking at creative suite 5 as an option. Will that allow me to do this? Thanks for the help

    You actually needed to have version 2.0 in order to have CMYK function. The year was 1991.

  • Need Info on RGB to CMYK

    Hi,
    I am new to Illustrator (CS5) and not fully comfortable with RGB vs CMYK.  For instance, I created a logo for use on the web using Document Color Mode: RGB where my background color in RGB is 0, 0, 130.  When I create a Print document using Document Color Mode: CMYK and copy the logo into the print document, it converts that background color to CMYK (C:100, M:98, Y:16 K:18) where the RGB is now (44, 45, 111).
    Is there a way to get a closer match to the original RGB color 0, 0, 130?  When the specifications for the print advertisement says images must be in CMYK,  I hope I am accomplishing this by using the Print Document Color Mode of CMYK vs RGB?  I feel somewhat ignorant on utilizing the RGB vs CMYK color modes and if anyone can give me a tip on what techniques they use to get a closer match of colors for RGB to CMYK or vice versa, I would love to hear it.
    Thank you,
    Keith

    Keith,
    First, be aware that you have posted to the Photoshop forum, not the Illustrator forum. The general concepts of color and color management are the same across the spectrum of digital imaging. However, its implementation is slightly different from application to application, so you may also want to post your question to the Illlustrator forum.
    [EDIT: Brain fart on my part... This is the color management forum, NOT the Photoshop forum, so you are in the right place! (I spend most of my time in the Photoshop forum; I lost track of where I was...)]
    That said, you're running up against a general concept: color gamut.
    The color you've spec'd in your RGB file (0/0/130 - and we'll assume for now that it's in the sRGB color space) is outside the gamut of every CMYK color space. That means that the RGB color you see can not be reproduced using a mix of the four CMYK process colors (cyan, magenta, yellow, black). When converting to CMYK, the software picks the closest color that is within the gamut of the CMYK space, hence the color shift.
    When you're designing for CMYK, it's best to work in soft-proof mode which allows you to see a pretty close approximation of what your colors will look like in the final color output space - in your case, CMYK.
    In Photoshop, to turn on soft-proof, go to View > Proof Setup> Custom... and choose the CMYK output space that matches the press conditions you are designing for.
    There are books written about this, but hopefully this short answer points you in the right direction.
    Message was edited by: Rick McCleary

  • RGB to CMYK to commercial printer

    We are using CS2 InDesign and Photoshop 7 on a PC. I am putting together two
    large books. One insert section of the first book has color photos. I have
    to prepare these color photos for a printer located in China. They want all
    images to be CMYK .tiff.
    I have an assortment of about 100 images from various sources around the
    world, there are .tif, .jpg. .bmp, and .psd. All of them appear to be RGB.
    There are images with: 1) no color profile, 2) sRGB IE60966-2.1, and Adobe
    RGB 1998. Do all images need to have the same RGB color profile before
    converting to CMYK?
    I have been converting all of these to .tif (and using a single dpi/pixel
    resolution for
    all images).
    Do I just select/save as color mode CMYK? Or are there special
    settings/profiles I need to know about. Is there anything special for China?
    The printer's English is not that clear . I was hoping that someone in this
    group would be familiar with RGB to CMYK conversion.
    Also, it appears that the final PDF pages (with embedded Tiff images) will
    be very large. The first complete book for this project (there are two
    books) looks like it will be about 20GB. The second book looks like it could
    be 12GB. Both books together equal about 1,000 pages and have about 1,000
    images. 90% of the images are grayscale. What are the current technologies
    for sending large projects like this to a printer?
    Thanks
    ps, the Photoshop group suggested that I write to this group.

    Tech....
    In the conversions, are you referring to conversions of B&W or color images? I'll assume color for the moment.
    Assuming your monitor is properly calibrated, and assuming you are viewing your color images on your monitor, your conversions should keep "in gamut" colors the same. You will, however, probably see some loss of dynamic range, color, and saturation as you enter CMYK. If the color and dynamic range of the original is all within the destination CMYK gamut, you should see very little, if any, shift. The sad fact is that CMYK on press has limited dynamic range and color, especially compared to a bright monitor. This is generally true, though CMYK can print some colors that lie outside the typical monitor's gamut.
    If you have a brightly colored original in RGB mode, then you should experiment with both perceptual and relative colorimetric rendering to see which one looks best. This is an image by image thing. Relative colorimetric will reproduce all "in gamut colors" as accurately as possible, then will take out of gamut colors and bring them to the closest printable color. This can cause loss of detail and 'piling up of colors' as you near the boundaries of the image's color gamut in the destination CMYK space. Perceptual scales ALL colors and preserves the relationships between colors, which sacrifices color accuracy and saturation, but sometimes looks more natural, especially if there are a LOT of out of gamut colors. Pick whichever ones looks best overall.
    Then, once in CMYK, make minor curves adjustments to tweak if for CMYK. Just be careful not to push it too far, especially in the deep shadows, since you may push beyond the ink limit of the press. For example, if you convert to US Web Coated SWOP v2, the ink limits are set at 300 total. If you drastically darken the shadow areas, you could end up with an ink limit of 320, 330, 350, etc. Knowing the ink limit of the press will help you stay within those limits. Final tweaking in CMYK is usually a good thing.
    How did you determine that the images were dull with too much magenta? Did you print a proof on a calibrated printer, or is this just your screen display? Or is this from a printed image off the press? I have a well calibrated monitor and accurate custom profiles for my inkjet. If I am sending a job to a press that supposedly prints to US Web Coated SWOP, I can proof that file on my inkjet and get a very good match. We need more information to know exactly what you are doing and how you are assessing your images.
    Normally, I do the conversion in Photoshop, using the rendering intent that looks best. Then I tweak the image in CMYK to get it looking its best. I usually have the press profile, but sometimes work with a standard profile if no custom profile is available. I leave the image tagged with my conversion profile. Then, I usually place these images into InDesign, with the profile intact (color management turned on in InDesign). I right click on the placed image to be sure that the profile and rendering intent are set to what I want. Then, I can either supply the InDesign file to the printer, or convert to PDF (leave color unchanged) and make sure that all profiles are included. InDesign should export each image to the PDF properly, along with profile and intent. I have never sent to job to press using Photoshop...only InDesign or Illustrator.
    BTW, rendering intent is only used when getting an image from one color space to another, such as a conversion from RGB to CMYK. You do that, choosing the one that looks the best. Once it is in the destination CMYK space, rendering intent is no longer needed, since all the colors and tones have already been remapped into the final space. Rendering intent is just used to help us handle those out of gamut colors.
    Hope this helps.
    Lou

  • Why does Illustrator automatically change RGB and CMYK values

    Hi, I am struggling to understand why Illustrator is changing the values inside the RGB and CMYK boxes. I am also not sure of the exact relationship between these values. Essentially, it appears that if you set the Document Color Mode to RGB, it leaves the RGB values that you type in alone. If you set the Document Color Mode to CMYK, it leaves the CMYK values alone.
    But as soon as you change the Color Mode, it automatically modifies the values. So if you were in RGB mode and you set some RGB values, it changes those RGB values when you switch to CMYK mode. And vice versa.
    I had thought that the CMYK palette was a subset of the RGB palette. It would make sense to me if it did this when I switched from RGB to CMYK mode, but it doesn't make sense to me why it does this when I switch from CMYK to RGB mode.
    The other thing I am confused about is the relationship of the values in the RGB boxes to the values in the CMYK boxes. I would have thought that the relationship between them would be static. Actually, it is not. When I am in CMYK mode and I enter a CMYK value of 90 16 0 0, the RGB values become 0 158 222. But when I switch over to RGB mode, the RGB values of 0 158 222 result in CMYK values of 75 23 0 0.
    Very confusing.
    Thanks in advance if you can explain this behavior!
    Best Regards,
    Z.

    Color management.
    Hi, I am struggling to understand why Illustrator is changing the values inside the RGB and CMYK boxes. I am also not sure of the exact relationship between these values. Essentially, it appears that if you set the Document Color Mode to RGB, it leaves the RGB values that you type in alone. If you set the Document Color Mode to CMYK, it leaves the CMYK values alone.
    An Ai document can be either RGB or CMYK. The colors follow the document color mode and thus are converted immediately if they don't match.
    But as soon as you change the Color Mode, it automatically modifies the values. So if you were in RGB mode and you set some RGB values, it changes those RGB values when you switch to CMYK mode. And vice versa.
    Same reason.
    I had thought that the CMYK palette was a subset of the RGB palette. It would make sense to me if it did this when I switched from RGB to CMYK mode, but it doesn't make sense to me why it does this when I switch from CMYK to RGB mode.
    It's not. CMYK color spaces (there are more than just one) are normally smaller than RGB color spaces, but they aren't a "subset".
    The other thing I am confused about is the relationship of the values in the RGB boxes to the values in the CMYK boxes. I would have thought that the relationship between them would be static. Actually, it is not. When I am in CMYK mode and I enter a CMYK value of 90 16 0 0, the RGB values become 0 158 222. But when I switch over to RGB mode, the RGB values of 0 158 222 result in CMYK values of 75 23 0 0.
    When Illustrator converts the colors, it uses color management: the profiles you set up and the methods you set up. After converting it forgets the color that used to be. When converting "back", it uses color management again.
    When you convert an very bright RGB color, it be out of the CMYK gamut. So it get's converted to the closest possbile CMYK color (which might still be far away from the original color. But it's not possible to convert it "back" to the bright one unless you just revert the conversion (by Cmd/Ctrl + Z).

  • RGB or CMYK colour formatting for iPhoto Albums printing.

    Hi.
    I'm putting my first iPhoto Album together. Info given from Apple about what colour format to use for your photos, says to use RGB. While this is corrcet for digital monitors and screens. Mass printing uses CMYK. Any images supplied to a printers in RGB will colour shift when printed in CMYK. No matter what a printer tells you, these colour shifts can be very noticable. I'm an Advertsing Art Director and I've seen the shift that happens.
    I will be checking/colour correting all photos submitted to the iPhoto Album with Adobe Photoshop. And many will very probably undergo some corrections. Be it through levels, curves, hue/saturation, etc. Nothing to anything near an excessive level, but enough to make obvious improvements.
    So I will then be faced with the choice of whether to save the images out in RGB or CMYK.
    Can someone with some technique knowledge, from the iPhoto team, tell me/reasure me why RGB has been specified? And if CMYK wouldn't actually be a preferable colour format to supply in, considering you'll be printing them in CMYK.
    Many Thanks, Jim.

    You're absolutely correct. I was referring to notes make a number of years ago in regards to iPhoto 5  and that RGB was recommended for both books and prints. 
    I was confusing CMYK with Grayscale with Dot Gain 20% profile when stating iPhoto didn't support it which it didn't fully support until iPhoto 9.
    In fact I just ran a test with iPhoto 6, 7 and 8 with a CMYK AND GrayScale files with the following results:
    iPhoto 6 (06): wouldn't import CMYK but did GrayScale.  The grayscale file would only display as a black thumbnail and negative full image.  If the DotGain 20% profile was stipped from it the iamge would dispaly normally.
    iPhoto 7 (08): wouldn't import CMYK but did GrayScale.  The grayscale file would only display as a black thumbnail and negative full image.  If the DotGain 20% profile was stipped from it the iamge would dispaly normally.
    iPhoto 8 (09): neither file would import which is surprising:
    iPhoto 9.2.3 (11):  both imported and viewed normally.
    iPhoto 9.4 (11):  both imported and viewed normally.
    In Oct, 2007 I got an email from Apple support with the following:
    Also as iphoto makes a pdf of the book and then uploads it to keep the size down, it doesn't matter if the pics are RGB or CMYK as a pdf is a closed file. But since it is going through prinergy it has an RGB checker so this most be switched off. It is how the software in prinergy handle's it that causes the washed out affect as it takes the Red Green Blue colours and tries to convert to Cyan Magenta Yellow Black. Now the colour spectrum in printing between rgb and cmyk is quite different looking at a colour wheel will show you. The best way i can describe it is if you have a pantone book which has spot on one side and process on the other you can see a colour difference. Or if you use quark open up the colours and again switch between process and spot.
    BUT ONLY CONVERT PICS TO CMYK IF YOU ONLY INTEND TO ORDER BOOKS. IF YOU INTEND TO ORDER PRINTS IT WILL NEED TO BE RGB.
    Here's how i see it:
    1. Apple doesn't want 2 different versions of the pics floating about as running CMYK through a photomachine (as prints you would order in the high street) will not print correctly.
    2. RGb's going through a CMYK press using prinergy will attempt to convert and produce the washed out effect, or yellowing effect BUT will still print.
    So it will use the 2nd option as it will still produce prints normally and books with a slightly washed out effect. Now to most people in the high street, who will notice a difference?
    I have just received my latest book saved as CMYK pics in tiff format and no washed out effect. What i will say is The quality if still not as good as a print. Now we use a docucolour 5252 at work and the colour quality is better. I wonder how often the machine is calibrated and what colour curve it is set to?
    However, I am unable to import a CMYK file in any iPhoto version until iPhoto 9. Go figure.
    Thanks for the feedback.  Hadn't addressed this particular subject in quite a long time.

  • ICC profile to convert RGB to CMYK,   jpeg is ok, png format have a problem

    When I use ICC profile to convert RGB to CMYK, jpeg format is ok, but png format have a problem.the color is lossy.
    It means, the png file color is shallow than jpeg file after convert.Could anybody help me?
    thanks
    source code
    import java.awt.image.BufferedImage;
    import java.io.File;
    import java.io.FileNotFoundException;
    import java.io.FileOutputStream;
    import java.io.IOException;
    import java.io.OutputStream;
    import java.util.Iterator;
    import javax.imageio.IIOImage;
    import javax.imageio.ImageIO;
    import javax.imageio.ImageTypeSpecifier;
    import javax.imageio.ImageWriteParam;
    import javax.imageio.ImageWriter;
    import javax.imageio.metadata.IIOMetadata;
    import javax.imageio.metadata.IIOMetadataNode;
    import javax.imageio.stream.ImageOutputStream;
    import org.w3c.dom.Node;
    import com.sun.image.codec.jpeg.ImageFormatException;
    import com.sun.image.codec.jpeg.JPEGCodec;
    import com.sun.image.codec.jpeg.JPEGEncodeParam;
    import com.sun.image.codec.jpeg.JPEGImageEncoder;
    public class TestImage {
         public static void main(String args[]) throws ImageFormatException, IOException{
              BufferedImage readImage = null;
              try {
                  readImage = ImageIO.read(new File("C:\\TEST.jpg"));
              } catch (Exception e) {
                  e.printStackTrace();
                  readImage = null;
              readImage = CMYKProfile.getInstance().doChColor(readImage);
              writeImage(readImage, "C:\\TEST_after_.jpg", 1.0f);
        protected static String getSuffix(String filename) {
            int i = filename.lastIndexOf('.');
            if(i>0 && i<filename.length()-1) {
                return filename.substring(i+1).toLowerCase();
            return "";
        protected static void writeImage(BufferedImage image, String filename, float quality) {
            Iterator writers = ImageIO.getImageWritersBySuffix(getSuffix(filename));
            System.out.println("filename�F"+filename);
            if (writers.hasNext()) {
                ImageWriter writer = (ImageWriter)writers.next();
                try {
                    ImageOutputStream stream
                        = ImageIO.createImageOutputStream(new File(filename));
                    writer.setOutput(stream);
                    ImageWriteParam param = writer.getDefaultWriteParam();
                    if (param.canWriteCompressed()) {
                        param.setCompressionMode(ImageWriteParam.MODE_EXPLICIT);//NO COMPRESS
                        param.setCompressionQuality(quality);
                    } else {
                        System.out.println("Compression is not supported.");
                    IIOMetadata metadata = null;
                    if(getSuffix(filename).equals("png") || getSuffix(filename).equals("PNG")){
                         ImageTypeSpecifier imageTypeSpecifier = new ImageTypeSpecifier(image);
                         metadata = writer.getDefaultImageMetadata(imageTypeSpecifier, param);
                            String sFormat = "javax_imageio_png_1.0";
                            Node node = metadata.getAsTree(sFormat);
                            IIOMetadataNode gammaNode = new IIOMetadataNode("gAMA");
                            String sGamma = "55556";
                            gammaNode.setAttribute("value", sGamma);
                            node.appendChild(gammaNode);
                            metadata.setFromTree(sFormat, node);
                    writer.write(null, new IIOImage(image, null, metadata), param);
                    writer.dispose();
                    return;
                } catch (IOException ex) {
                    ex.printStackTrace();
    }

    Hi,
    I am having similar problems. I have read somewhere that png format can not handle CMYK colorspace anyway, which I find odd (and plainly stupid IM(NS)HO) which would mean that converting to RGB and therefore using profiles is mandatory.
    May be you should check if the internal format of the png files claims it is RGB or CMYK (using ImageMagick's "identify" command for example).
    HTH
    JG

  • RGB to CMYK without losing quality

    How can I convert a photoshop file, which is in RGB, into CMYK image mode without losing quality?
    Whenever I try to convert the image mode, it totally changes the colors making it damn ugly. I want the brochure to be printed and for that it should be in CMYK format.
    Kindly help me. Its urgent.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Snehal Masne

    Snehal,
    A lot depends on the particular colors you're using in RGB, what sort of CMYK printer or press you're using and just how you're actually converting to CMYK. Most images print just fine in CMYK, as can be seen by the many thousands that print every day in magazines and newspapers around the world. CMYK's weakest areas are bright saturated blues, which will always print like crap because the inks just cannot print those colors. You haven't told anyone exactly why your conversions look like crap, only that they do. If you posted an example, more specific help could be given, but the bottom line is that there are always going to be some compromises going to press and you, as the designer, have to take those possibilities into account when doing your design. You can also trick the viewer's eyes into thinking the image is more saturated than it really is by intelligent use of color contrasts in images and designs. For instance, using a bright yellow, something that presses print quite well, next to the best blue you can print, will make that blue appear bluer and more saturated than it really is. Of course, if you need exact and specific color matches, you can always go to additional spot color plates using Pantone or other color inks, at an added cost in both money and complexity.
    Entire books have been written on this subject, and for good reason.

  • Why do the relative values of RGB and CMYK change when switching between Photoshop and InDesign?

    I'm trying to put together a Colour Guide for my company's brand guidelines.
    I initially worked from InDesign and wrote down all the H, RGB, and CMYK values that I got when I eye-dropped my original colour palette.
    However when I put the same RGB values into Photoshop- I am given a (slightly) different set of CMYK numbers from those that I had originally documented in InDesign.
    Why is this???

    Jamie,
    in Photoshop go to Edit > Color Settings and choose your  parameters:
    For RGB: sRGB or AdobeRGB (1998)
    For CMYK: the process as recommended by your printer (person, company)
    For offset printing this is here ISOCoated-v2-eci and elsewhere for instance SWOP.
    For digital printing you should ask the company as well.
    For Grayscale: Gray Gamma 2.2
    For Spot: probably irrelevant in the moment. Dot Gain 20%
    Everything as shown here:
    For your application I've modified my settings a little, therefore we can see top left 'unsynchronized'.
    In InDesign do practically the same, but there are no settings for Grayscale.
    You'll find for any topic explanations if you move to by mouse (position the pointer over ...).
    The field 'Settings' shows not 'Custom' but the file name of a configuration which had been previously saved
    and then loaded (buttons top right).
    Further explanations on request. It would be quite useless to explain everything now at the same time.
    The colors will be wrong if the settings are not synchronized. Above they are explicitly synchronized.
    Because Bridge was not used, the system considers them as 'not synchronized', which doesn't matter.
    Best regards --Gernot Hoffmann

  • Conversion rgb in cmyk

    Hello everybody,
    i use kuler first time - cool tool!
    I have a questions about conversion rgb in cmyk.
    In Photoshop or Illsutrator i get complete different values
    for the same color.
    I try to change the color profiles adjustment, but never i
    get the same color values
    like kuler. For example: in kuler the cmyk color 0/60/100/0
    would translate in rgb 255/102/0.
    In PS i get 235/136/14 (in depends what profile i used).
    Which color conversion engine or profile use kuler? Can i get
    the same profile for PS or IL?
    Regards, Lars

    Hello, kuler color conversions should be consistent with
    Illustrator CS3, since kuler is a subset of the Illustrator CS3
    Live Color feature. Generally speaking, it's best to create your
    kuler theme in the color space you want to use.
    More on color management
    here.
    Hope this helps!
    Sami

  • Rgb to cmyk turns white brown

    Hi Guys
    In previous versions - changing from RGB to CMYK or vice versa would change the colours slightly but ever since CC when I change one to the other my white
    goes brown and there is a yellow tone to the image.
    Has anyone else experienced this - it's not slight either see image. I haven't adjusted anything - the original CMYK is on the left and
    when I make it RGB - it goes brown.
    Has anyone else had this issue?

    I'd try a new display profile first. Recalibrate, or if you don't have a calibrator use sRGB (or Adobe RGB if your display is wide gamut).
    Everything in Photoshop passes through the display profile. If there's a problem with the profile it can happen that one conversion goes bad but not another.
    On Windows a common cause for this is bogus manufacturer profiles pushed through Windows Update. Mac isn't as susceptible to this, but there you have an added complication called ColorSync (which is where the actual profile conversions are done). So if a new profile doesn't fix it, you probably need someone with Mac OS X expertise.

Maybe you are looking for

  • My icloud account has been blocked and i do not know why?

    I have an icloud account that has been absolutely fine for years but this week I received spam emails saying that postmaster returns from a company in Germany. These kept popping up. I ignored them but now i cannot access or receive any emails. Pleas

  • Trying to insert data into a spreadsheet on the fly

    I'm sure this is a very basic question, but I came into the project I'm doing this semester with no LabVIEW experience, and I've just taught myself along the way. RIght now, I'm trying to calibrate a pyrometer with a thermocouple wafer.  I want to ge

  • Event based scheduler job - 2 events at the same time only 1 run

    Hi, i converted our dbms_job - jobs to the newer package dbms_scheduler. It is a 10.2.0.4 patch 23(8609347) database on an windows server 2003 R2 Enterprise x64 Edition SP2. The Jobs(about 130) are nothing special ... only some statistics, matview-re

  • Where are my audio books in purchased items, where are my audio books in purchased items

    I have recently updated y itunes to the new version. Now I cant find audio books in purchased items. I can find books, but there is not a section for audio books. Can someone help please. G

  • Nokia 5530 - Applications wont start

    I sent some games to my Nokia 5530 via bluetooth, installed successfully and working, so then i made a folder in Applications directory and moved all the games onto that folder. The next day i turn on my phone, start a game it wont load up, none of t