Rotate 3D sprites to point at the camera

Hi all,
I'm in the middle of creating a scene where a camera (on a path) passes several 3D layers. On the 3D sprites is a .png mapped of a figure. Is there a simple way to make the 3D layers automatically rotate around their Y-axis so the mapped figures appear to be looking at the camera while it passes by ? It seems a huge work to achieve this by manually adjusting the parameters of the layers...
Thanks in advance for the reply!
Sven
ps: using After Effects CS3, CS4 is at my disposal if needed.

You can auto-orient layers in all 3 dimensions using Layer/Transform/Auto-Orient.
To limit it to the Y axis, look at Dan Ebbert's expression on his website:
http://www.motionscript.com/design-guide/auto-orient-y-only.html

Similar Messages

  • Rotation lock doesn't work for the camera?

    I can't lock the rotation for the camera and it's infuriating. I've locked the rotation on my phone by sliding up and pressing the lock, and that works for all my other apps. However, when using the camera, it will still rotate. I don't want to, nor should I have to, edit every single picture and rotate them afterwards. Been through my settings and can't figure it out. Any help would be great!

    There is no "rotation lock" on iPhones as there is on iPads.  There is Portrait mode lock, which locks the screen to portrait view.  (There is no way to lock to landscape view on an iPhone.)  Portrait lock would not be very usefull for the camera.

  • Putting the anchor point of the camera at the center of a cube?

    I built a 3d cube and want the camera to spin around it.
    I don't want to animate/spin the cube itself, but I want to animate the camera.
    Whats the best and quickest way of getting the anchor point exactly at the center of the cube?
    At the moment if I place the anchor visually at the center, the camera itself is too close to the cube. I can't create distance between the cube and camera.:s
    Thanks,,

    Howdy,
    When you move an object, you also move the object's anchor point. The easiest way to accomplish what you want is to build a simple camera rig. Place the camera inside a 3D group and position the group's anchor point in the center of the cube. You can then move the camera around as you see fit, and when you want to do your orbit move (I assume that's why you want the anchor in the cube), you animate the group.
    Rigs are handy for all sorts of tasks like this. For example, you may want to create a 3D motion path that flies the camera all around a scene, but you also want the freedom to have the camera pan around while flying along the path. Think of it as a camera operator riding in a cable-car.

  • What is the point of the camera with no viewfinder?

    I understand I can take pictures of myself but can I look through anything like a viewfinder to take a picture? 

    After opening the camera app, you can use your fingers by pinching together or spreading apart (two fingers that is) so the image zooms.  That is all I do with it since it is pretty simplistic system.

  • Rotate about a specific point

    I have a script that creates geologic map symbols, positions them, and rotates them into their proper orientation.  However, I do not know how to rotate about a specific point (not the center of the group). The portion of script in question is:
    if (dlg.symbol.bedding.value) {
    var myLine = stGroup.pathItems.add();
    myLine.stroked = true;
    myLine.setEntirePath([[posx,posy],[posx+3,posy]]);
    myLine.strokeWidth = .75;
    var myLine = stGroup.pathItems.add();
    myLine.setEntirePath([[posx,posy - 6.75],[posx,posy + 6.75]]);
    myLine.stroked = true;
    myLine.strokeWidth = .75;
    stGroup.rotate(-azi);
    and I wish to rotate around the point [posx, posy].  How do I accomplish this?

    Thanks!  That worked.  For future reference, here's the modified section of script:
    if (dlg.symbol.bedding.value) {
    var myLine = stGroup.pathItems.add();
    myLine.stroked = true;
    myLine.setEntirePath([[posx,posy],[posx+3,posy]]);
    myLine.strokeWidth = .75;
    var myLine = stGroup.pathItems.add();
    myLine.setEntirePath([[posx,posy - 6.75],[posx,posy + 6.75]]);
    myLine.stroked = true;
    myLine.strokeWidth = .75;
    mapDoc.theOrigin = mapDoc.rulerOrigin;
    mapDoc.rulerOrigin = [posx,posy];
    stGroup.rotate(-azi, undefined,undefined,undefined,undefined,Transformation.DOCUMENTORIGIN);
    mapDoc.rulerOrigin = mapDoc.theOrigin;
    Another parameter in the rotate method to specify a rotation point would be nice.  Still, this works just fine, so no complaints from me.

  • How to make it look like the camera is following a zig zagging line

    I have an animated video where a person clicks a button and an arrow appears coming out of the right side of the computer. I would like to make it look like the camera follows the arrow as it zooms along a zig zag path and eventually ends at another computer.  Does anyone know of any good tutorials for this? 
    Thanks,
    Paul

    This is just a matter of keyframes for camera position and point of interest.You are probably not going to find a tutorial that exactly matches your project. Try this:
    Open up 2 views, one active camera, one top view.
    Set a position keyframe for the camera where you want the movement to start.
    Drag the point of interest to point at your subject (animated arrow)
    Using the top view and setting the CTI (current time indicator) to the end point of the camera move, move the camera's point of interest  to the same position as the animated arrow
    Still in the top view, move the camera to it's final position
    Using the pen tool (keyboard shortcut g) add points to the camera position path and drag them into a zig zag shape using the top view
    Selecting the Point of interest in the timeline, adjust the position of the point of interest to follow the arrow as it animates across the screen by moving the CTI and setting new positions.
    Another thing you could do would be just to use a lookAt expression for point of interest. This would keep the camera pointed at the arrow.
    Hope this helps. Animating a camera is one of the most basic skills an AE artist should have. It takes a bit of practice but it's not hard.

  • Where is the camera button on the lock screen?

    That was the big point of the camera beyond increased megapixels.

    If you double-click the home button while on the lock screen it pops up on the bottom right-hand side.

  • A lightroom preset to produce a RAW conversion that always looks like the camera-processed JPG?

    Hi,
    Any tips on how to make a Lightroom preset that will render the RAW file in a manner that looks remotely the same as the picture displayed when shot?
    I'm not talking about camera calibration > camera standed, portrait etc.
    With Lightrooms clunky default adjustments the histogram looks correct; i.e. the way it did when it was shot. The image also looks horrible; clipped blacks, too contrasty etc. because it arbitrarily boosts Brightness +50, Contrast +25
    When I zero the settings the histogram shifts completely away from the way it was shot, as if it was underexposed, which is not correct. I've tested this with perfect exposures using a GMB colour chart.
    I guess the camera is showing me a histogram of the JPEG after it has been processed.
    Is there a quantifiable way to replicate this other than playing with the sliders until the RAW roughly matches the JPG and then saving the preset?
    Thanks.
    Update - I'm using a Canon 5DMkII and a 1DsMkII

    Good grief. When I photograph a color chart, under controlled lighting conditions, exposed perfectly, that is what I want to see as the default RAW conversion, with acurate values. In fact with camera calibrations that is pretty much how it works. It's not open to interpretation. Blacks have a certain value, neutral 8, neutral 6.8 etc.
    If not, then give me the tools to accomplish this quickly. In Photoshop I can shoot a scene under controlled lighting, shoot a color chart in the first frame, create a custom curve and apply this to every subsequent shot. There is a rough way to do this in LR but it's quite a backward step.
    THEN I can have a filed day, changing whatever I want, but I do not like randomly dragging sliders until it "looks ok". I stopped doing that my first year of Photoshop when I learned how to use the color sampler correctly.
    "If you shoot raw (as opposed to JPEG) then YOU have the power and capability to decide what stuff is supposed to look like. "
    I understand I have the power to decide what stuff looks like. Nothing I have said so far argues against this. I'm asking for an accurate baseline, from which I can let my creativity run wild.
    " I encourage people to ignore the LCD and go with your guts", "If you are lazy and don't want to be bothered rendering the scene, yes, I can understand why you would want somebody else to control the interpretation of the scene"
    The LCD and the histogram are a quick way of evaluating correct exposure for a shot, so that blacks are not clipped and highlights are not blown out and lost forever. They are standard TOOLs of modern photography. To not use them is illogical. It would be like instructing people not to use the camera's inbuilt light meter, because it's "more creative" without it.
    It does not have to be one extreme or the other. People seem to be saying "reject the jpg - it means nothing. Let the artist in you decide" and yet they blithely accept the default settings Lightroom gives. My point is, the camera rendering is a good REFERENCE POINT, far more accurate to what you saw on the day, and far more relevant, than LR's adjustments.
    Once I have an accurate rendering, quickly, THEN I can be creative and enjoy the power and flexibility of RAW. If nothing else, it's a much faster way to work.

  • I have an Air running Mountain Lion. I also have a digital point-and-shoot camera, but have never downloaded any images from the camera to this Air. If I connect the camera to the Air, what might I expect? Will connecting the camera to the Air by a cable

    I have an 11" Air with lots of remaining capacity running Mountain Lion. I also have a digital point-and-shoot camera. I have never downloaded images from the camera to this Air. However, if I just connect the camera to the Air's USB port, with the camera's available cable, and the Air is open, will a program like ImageCapture or iPhoto, auomatically come up, and I can begin to download wanted images? Or, will this sort of connection delete or fry everything on the Air? Do I need any other software on board? Will current Apple onboard programs allow me to download images from my camera and not destroy everything else?

    Answered. Thanks.

  • Is there a way to transfer photos from a point and shoot camera to a flash drive via the iPad?

    Is there a way to transfer photos from a point and shoot camera to a flash drive via the iPad?

    No.

  • Vanishing Point Exchange - How to place the camera ?

    When I import a .vpe file into AE, I'm given a "custom" camera with an un(real)worldly focal length, and six-figure position and zoom values. My 3D scene is in extreme close-up.
    My intuition is to give the camera a 35mm preset, set the zoom in real-world terms (I know,... I'm not in the real world anymore, Toto) and then move the camera position to my required start point.
    I've been trying this, with multiple variations, all day and am getting nowhere - whatever I do results in either correct geometry at an unusable distance, or a nicely composed frame with unacceptable geometry. (I got lucky once early this morning - but have since been unable to repeat the result).
    A question to those who, unlike me, know what they're doing: How should I go about this ??
    Thanks !

    That's
    brilliant - thank you so much. This points the camera squarely at the
    front vertical plane (in the real world terms of my scene, the end wall
    of the hall). I'm no longer lost in space.
    I then change the
    camera Position Z-axis value to bring the camera closer to this plane
    and ... Uh oh! the other four planes (side walls, floor and ceiling)
    become stretched into a streaky blur. Where did I go wrong ?
    If you want to post a screenshot, feel free to do it.
    I suspect what you are seeing is a limitation for textures extracted from planes which have wild perspective shifts. When planes are more perpendicular to the "real" camera, the less actual texture information in the original, especially as pixels go further away from the camera. Zooming/orbiting with a 3D camera just makes this much more obvious So, there are some real world limitations when navigating pictures turned into 3D scenes in this way.
    In clarification ... My final output is a QuickTime movie played from hard disk to a video projector. I work to a  frame size of 1400 x 1050 pixels to match the SXGA+ native resolution of my preferred projector (avoiding rescaling and loss of resolution in the projector). The size of my AE Footage image (in this case) is 5139 x 5433 to allow me to move my 1400 x 1050 frame around the footage to simulate camera movements. In the case of the "dolly in" towards the wall in my .vpe 3D set, 1400 x 1050 original pixels is the extreme limit of the movement beyond which I cannot go without interpolation and loss of resolution.
    So to rephrase my question, with apologies for lack of clarity first time around, what would be a realistic limit to the pixel count of my footage image given the limitations of my system: 2.26GHz Quad-Core, 16 GB RAM and fast RAID ?
    There should be no problems in such a case. In any case, just leave a couple of CPUs free in Memory and Multiprocessing, so that the other instances have more memory available to them.
    (I've just ordered CS4, even though CS3 is more than adequate to my "aesthetic" needs, as I believe it offers better management of multiprocessing – and in the hope it will make my OpenGL problems go away.)
    Multiprocessing in CS4 should be better, not worse. Sometimes "better" means taking a more conservative approach
    In CS3, MP was more an "all or nothing" kind of thing, even if people used a buried text preference to turn off some cores. There are now officially supported management options for users.

  • My video was recorded on my I phone 4, the camera was held sideways for a horizontal view, but loads in I movie vertically.  How can I rotate the image so it is horizontal?

    My video was recorded on my I phone 4, the camera was held sideways for a horizontal view, but loads in I movie vertically.  How can I rotate the image so it is horizontal?

    Drag the clip from your Event to your Project. Then use the Rotate, Crop, Ken Burns Tool on the Middle Toolbar to rotate it

  • IPhoto library inflates from photos which were rotated in the camera!!!

    Hi,
    that is awful! I wondered why my iPhoto library is so big. I use the library only for slideshows and creating albums, *NOT for editing*.
    I found it out!!!
    I have tested it with a folder of 100 photos (approx. 1.5 MB each). One version of the folder (NORM) contains 100 horizontal photos. An Other version of the folder (ROTA) contains the same 100 photos with the EXIF-Flag "Rotate 90 CW" (my camera sets this flag automaticaly). The size of the 2 folders are exactly the same:
    <NORM>: 150.871.544 Bytes
    <ROTA>: 150.871.544 Bytes
    Before I import one of these folders, I create an empty iPhoto library, size: 14.556.512 Bytes
    And now the results:
    - If I import <NORM>, then the size of library grows up from 14 MB to 24 MB, reason: iPhoto generates thumbnails of every photo. That's OK.
    - If I import <ROTA>, then the size of library grows up from 14 MB to *255 MB*!! What the heck!!! iPhoto generates thumbnails AND A VERSION OF EACH PHOTO IN FOLDER MODIFIED!!! The size of every modified photo is bigger then 2 MB now (original 1.5 MB)!! Why?? The photo is NOT modified!!!
    Can you enlighten me?

    Not searched the forum then? This "discovery" turns up every couple of weeks. And the answer has been the same since iPhoto 1.
    Your camera has an Auto-Rotate feature. However, the camera does not actually rotate any pixels in the file, but instead flags it with an instruction: "Display me this way".
    Photo, seeing the flag, reads the intention and creates a modified version. Without this version, apps that integrate with iphoto, (like Word Processors, Mail Clients and Web Browsers) would end up with sideways photos. Why? Because they don't understand EXIF tags.
    If you then try to Revert to Original, iPhoto will remove the edited version. However, when it then looks at the Original file again, it sees the flag, and creates a new rotated version. This loop will run as long as you Revert to the Original.
    The solution is to either a: turn off the Auto-Rotate feature on your camera or b: rotate the photos prior to importing them to iPhoto.
    Regards
    TD

  • Has anybody used the Camera RAW filter on an OpenEXR, HDR or similar floating point color image?

    I often work on floating point images rendered out of 3ds Max, specifically OpenEXRs, and I have been lately using the Camera RAW filter to do some image adjustments. There is one problem though, the float image does not load correctly into Camera RAW. It looks slightly over-exposed when loaded and it is nearly impossible to get it back to "scratch". Is Camera RAW not fully float capable? Camera RAW is a drunkard compositor's dream when doing color corrections on a floating point image, especially an image rendered out of a 3D application such as 3ds Max or Maya. Any thoughts?
    Mark Kauffman
    Technical Lead of Project Visualization
    Parsons Brinckerhoff

    For what it's worth I have seen this going back a loooong time.  I've posted on the subject as well and have never gotten a solid answer.  It just appears as though Photoshop considers it "already open, so no need to open it twice".  I believe an uninitialized variable could be involved, since it's intermittent.
    I have found a couple of choices for workarounds or workflow changes...
    1.  You can save the first-opened document opened (e.g., as  a .PSD) somewhere.  Then reopening the raw file will always open a second document.
    2.  You could consider opening the raw file just once, duplicating it as a second layer, then use Camera Raw as a filter.  Obviously that doesn't avail Camera Raw of the raw data, but its usefulness depends on what you're trying to accomplish.
    -Noel

  • My iMessage screen is locked horizontally and will not rotate. When I access the camera through iMessage it will not rotate either. Any help with this will be very much appreciated.

    My iMessage screen is locked horizontally and will not rotate. When I access the camera through iMessage it will not rotate either. Any help with this will be very much appreciated.

    Hi MikeyGway,
    If you are having rotation issues on your iPad, you may find the following articles helpful:
    iOS: Screen does not rotate
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ts3805
    iPad: Understanding the side switch
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4085
    Regards,
    - Brenden

Maybe you are looking for

  • Impeccable support from Apple...

    Dear all, I feel that I need to say this, in view of all the negative posts regarding support from Apple. I am, admittedly, on my 4th MB. 1st's case was badly designed, and I returned it straight away as I had so many problems of the same ilk with my

  • How to get MRP indiactor in Excise Invoice tab in MIGO

    Hi All, My client wants MRP indicator field in Excise tab in MIGO. Please suugest the ways to get this. Thanks NDS

  • MacBook Pro 10.6.8 Safari quits unexpectedly error.

    Can anyone tell me what the problem is with my Safari using this crash report? Process:     Safari [196] Path:        /Applications/Safari.app/Contents/MacOS/Safari Identifier:  com.apple.Safari Version:     5.1.10 (6534.59.10) Build Info:  WebBrowse

  • Create a list of all of a certain entry?

    I have a table with many entries, marking dates and amounts from a bank statement as 'donations' or 'bills' etc Can I have a 2nd table, which automatically searches for all entries marked 'donations' and enters their relevant date? I have partially s

  • Flickering vs double buffering

    Hello, flickering is a common problem and is prevented by using offscreen images. And that's what I'm doing (though, I'm not sure whether I'm doing it right). Now, there's a cycle of images displayed as an animation in my program and the flickering i