Route for dual interface

I have two interfaces to be configured eth0 & eth1.
eth0 with the default gateway and eth1 with a different gateway.
Please provide the commands in solaris 10 to configure the above.

karthikkiruba wrote:
I have two interfaces to be configured eth0 & eth1.
eth0 with the default gateway and eth1 with a different gateway.
Please provide the commands in solaris 10 to configure the above.Solaris routing is destination based, not source based. You can't assign a gateway the way you're describing. In most cases, you don't need to because you can't force traffic to go out a specific interface anyway (without a lot of tricks).
Darren

Similar Messages

Using ASA 5510 and router for dual WAN Connections.

Guys, neeed some help here:
Context:
1- My company has one ASA 5510 configured with Site-to-site VPN, Ipsec Cisco VPN and AnyConnect VPN.
2- We use ASA to connect to the single ISP (ISP 1) for internet access. ASA does all the NATing for internal users to go out.
3- A second link is coming in and we will be using ISP 2 to loadbalance traffic to internet (i.e. business traffic will go via ISP1 and “other” traffic will go via ISP2).
4- A router will be deployed in front of the ASA to terminate internet links.
5- No BGP should be used to implement policy (traffic X goes via ISP1, traffic Y goes via ISP2).
Questions:
How do I get this done, particularly, how do I tell the router, for traffic X use ISP1 and for traffic Y use ISP2? PBR is my friend?
Since I will be having 2 public Ip Addresses from the 2 ISPs, how do I NAT internal users to the 2 public Ip addresses ?.
Finally, which device should be doing the NATing? The ASA just like now or move NATing to the Router?
Thanks
Ndaungwe

Hi,
Check the below link, it gives information on trasperant fw config and limilations. Based on the doc, you may need to move the VPN /anyconnect to router as well. From the routr end you may be able to set up static routes pointing to diff ISP based on traffic needs but this will be compleicated setup and can break things. Wait for other suggestions or if possible stick to ASA to terminate both links and still route the traffic to diff ISPs (Saves the router cost as well).
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a008089f467.shtml
Thx
MS

How to add a route for a specific interface

HI,
i want to make a direct link beetween 2 computers (ubuntu and solaris) with a cross over cable.
solaris : e1000g0 (192.168.0.212= normal network)
e1000g1 (172.18.0.2 = network for interconnection beetween ubuntu and solaris
routing table:
Destination Gateway Flags Ref Use Interface
default 192.168.0.245 UG 1 7040 e1000g0
192.168.0.0 192.168.0.212 U 1 5167 e1000g0
224.0.0.0 192.168.0.212 U 1 0 e1000g0
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 4 30343 lo0
ubuntu : eth0 (192.168.0.144 = normal network)
eth1 (172.18.0.3 = network for interconnection beetween ubuntu and solaris)
routing table :
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
0.0.0.0 192.168.0.245 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
at the beginning, i was thinking that no route was necessary, but the ping didn't work beetween the two servers.
so, my question is : how can i add a route for a specific interface on my solaris (i want that the traffic for the network 172.18.0.0 go throught e1000g1)
thank for your help

SOLARIS :
-bash-3.00# ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 index 1
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
e1000g0: flags=1004843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DHCP,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
inet 192.168.0.212 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
ether 0:1b:24:f0:7a:fc
e1000g1: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 3
inet 172.18.0.2 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 172.18.0.255
ether 0:1b:24:f0:7a:fd
-bash-3.00# netstat -rn
Routing Table: IPv4
Destination Gateway Flags Ref Use Interface
default 192.168.0.245 UG 1 7040 e1000g0
192.168.0.0 192.168.0.212 U 1 5323 e1000g0
224.0.0.0 192.168.0.212 U 1 0 e1000g0
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 8 31593 lo0
-bash-3.00#
UBUNTU :
ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1e:c9:d1:22:ea
inet addr:192.168.0.144 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::21e:c9ff:fed1:22ea/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:19992226 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:9886296 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:10075930406 (10.0 GB) TX bytes:2847567457 (2.8 GB)
Interrupt:16 Memory:f8000000-f8012700
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1e:c9:d1:22:ec
inet addr:172.18.0.3 Bcast:172.18.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::21e:c9ff:fed1:22ec/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:919 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:905 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:58816 (58.8 KB) TX bytes:91286 (91.2 KB)
Interrupt:16 Memory:f4000000-f4012700
# netstat -rn
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
0.0.0.0 192.168.0.245 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0

Bfd support for vrrp interface tracking query !

Hi All
I have a requirement in my typical LAN scenario whereby my LAN server connects in a dual homed fashion to two different LAN switches from a third party vendor. We are using vrrp for the server LAN. The two 3rd party vendor switches are uplinked via L3 links to two c6500. We are tracking the uplink interfaces under vrrp such that no traffic blackholing occurs if the uplink connectivity from master is broken. Now customer has asked to use bfd support in the vrrp uplink interface tracking which is supported by the vendor switches. This topic is confusing to me as what configuration would be required on c6500 to achieve this as the requirement is not to configure bfd for routing protocol but for vrrp interface tracking. As per my understanding BFD works only in integration with routing protocols and there would be no session formed by just enabling BFD under Interface Config. If anyone has any prior experience with implementing such setup please guide me on what needs to be done from c6500 side to achieve this. We are using static routes on c6500 for server LAN reachability and default route on vendor switches towards junos but no bfd for static routing.
Regards Varma

Hi Varma,
your understanding is correct, initially we were supporting BFD in conjunction with BGP/IGPs. Nowadays there's BFD support for VRRP in IOS XR and BFD support for HSRP in IOS. Since you're in multivendor environment, I don't think these options are feasible. You may instead apply subsecond hello timers in VRRP, provided you don't have lots of instances, you should not face a performance burden.
HTH,
Ivan.

I have a hard drive for CD storage that needs to connect to the Ethernet router. sInce my router is not in this room, and in another room, I want to use my Mac as a router for the drive, and share the wifi. Ho do I do this

I have a hard drive for CD storage that needs to connect to the Ethernet router. sInce my router is not in this room, and in another room, I want to use my Mac as a router for the drive, and share the wifi. Ho do I do this? I gace tried the System Preferences -> Sharing, shared internet to Ethernet, but can't se ethe device on Finder

Djembe wrote:
UEFI (unified extensible firmware interface) boot requires Global unique identifier Partition Table (GPT) as opposed to the older Master Boot Record (MBR). If your existing drive is formatted in MBR, you will need to adjust BIOS settings to enable legacy boot in order for it to work properly.
Is there a performance difference between GPT and MBR? If GPT is better, I do not mind formatting the drive with it.
5. No special drivers are needed.
Thanks. What about the thunderbolt port?
7. I think Lenovo estimates 6 hours.
Lenovo says 6 hours with the 6-cell battery on its website.
BrendaEM wrote:
Hi,
There was a serious BIOS/UEFI problem with that SSD . Perhaps this thread will save you some headaches. Someone is recomending shutting off Rapid Boot in the setup, which would probable mean little with a SSD, anyway.
I read through this, and it looks like the problem was fixed in a BIOS update, which I plan to do. However, it also seems like Intel Rapid Start is not even worth it in the first place, as sleep consumes almost no power at all.
W540: i7-4700mq, K2100m, 8 GB DDR3L, 512 GB SSD
T510: i7-620m, NVS 3100m, 8 GB DDR3, 512 GB SSD

Which case we go for abap interface?

Hi friends,
As per my understand some scenario's are running with out PI integration.........those are called abap interfaces....
then which case we go for Pi? and which case we go for ABAP interface?
please help me on this...
Thanks & Regards
E.Ravi Chandra Reddy

Hi Ravi,
Understand this way,PI is not only for mapping.It is also used for doing the routing at the runtime.Suppose if you have A coming in the payload it should go to receiver X otherwise Y.
So,depends as per your business requirement.If you just want to integrate 2 system directly.You can go with that but suppose in future you have number of system,you cant do 1:1 connection everytime.At that time you require some middleware to integrate your scenario.
Regards,
Abhi

Configuration Scenario for multiple Interfaces

Hi,
I have an Party X who will receive invoices and credit memos from SAP.
Credit memo and Invoices both use the same idoc type Invoices.
In XI we have different target format for Credit Memo and Invoices.
I have a condition in the idoc which will determine whether it is Credit Memo or Invoices.
My question is that how do i route the receiver to different mapping at runtime based on whether it is credit memo or invoices.
Since both needs to go to the same receiver, but differnt mapping at runtime.
Regards
Krish

Hi Krish.
You can create a Condition (routing rule) for this in the Interface Determination Object of the interface scenario.
There it will be routed to correct Interface Mapping and Inbound Message.
Follow above a help link (See InterfaceDeterminationRule ):
Description for Interface Determination
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi711/helpdata/en/48/d2618c0d7d035be10000000a42189b/frameset.htm
I hope it helps you.
Bruno

Policy based routing on VRF interfaces to route traffic through TE Tunnel

Hi All,
Is there a method to do policy based routing on VRF interfaces and route data traffic through one TE tunnel and non-data traffic through another TE tunnel.
The tunnel is already build up with these below config
interface Tunnel25
ip unnumbered Loopback0
tunnel destination 10.250.16.250
tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng
tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-option 10 explicit name test
ip explicit-path name test enable
next-address x.x.x.x
next-address y.y.y.y
router ospf 1
mpls traffic-eng router-id Loopback0
mpls traffic-eng area 0
mpls traffic-eng tunnels
nterface GigabitEthernet5/2
mpls traffic-eng tunnels
mpls ip
Is there additional config needed to work ,also in the destination end for the return traffic,we want to use the normal PATH --I mean non TE tunnel.
We tested with the above scenario,but couldn't able to reach the destination.Meantime we had a question,when the packet uses the policy map while ingress,it may not know the associatuion with VRF(Is that right? --If so ,how to make it happen)
Any help would be really appreciated
Thanks
Regards
Anantha Subramanian Natarajan

hi Anantha!
I might not be the right person to comment on your first question. I have not configured MVPNs yet and not very confertable with the topic.
But I am sure that if you read through the CBTS doc thoroughly, you might be able to derive the answer yourself. One thing I notice is that " a Tunnel will be selected regularly according to the routing process (even isf it is cbts enabled). From the tunnels selected using the regular best path selection, the traffic is mapped to a perticular tunnel in the group if specific class is mapped to that tunnel.
So a master tunnel can be the only tunnel between the 2 devices over which the routing (bgp next hops) are exchanged and all other tunnels can be members of this tunnel. So your RPF might not fail.
You might have to explore on this a bit more and read about the co-existance of multicast and TE. This will be the same as that.
For your second question, the answer would be easy :
If you want a specific eompls cust to take a particular tunnel/path, just create a seperate pair of loopbacks on the PEs. Make the loopback learnt on the remote PE through the tunnel/path that you want the eompls to take. Then establish the xconnect with this loopback. I am assuming that your question is that a particular eompls session should take a particular path.
If you meant that certain traffic from the same eompls session take a different path/tunnel, then CBTS will work.
Regards,
Niranjan

Dynamic Name for Yellow Interface Table

Hi All,
Can anybody guide me how to use dynamic name for Yellow Interface Target Table.
Eg: T_SESSIONID.
I tried
1)Refreshing the SESSIONID in a Variable V1 and using T_#V1 directly
2) Refreshing the T_#V1 in a Variable V2 and using #V2
But its not creating properly.
Please guide.

You want to create dynamic target table name right?
You can refresh a variable like #GET_SESSION
#GET_SESSION= SELECT <%=odiRef.getSession("SESS_NAME")%> FROM DUAL
My tmp table name like TMP_#GET_SESSION
then in your package refresh #GET_SESSION variable and you can use it.
I hope this can be helpful
Thanks

Help routing with dual connections to 1 ISP, 2 routers, 2 firewalls

My company is moving to a new office building and has ordered redundant Internet connections through the same ISP. I have not had the chance to speak to the ISP vendor, but from what I have been told they expect us to participate in BGP since we will require load-balancing and high availability for inbound web traffic. My limited experience with BGP has been in a lab environment. The company has already purchased the two routers and two ASAs. We have a block of public IP addresses.
My objectives are to
1. Allow internal users to get out to the Internet
2. Allow outside users to browse our public web site.
3. Configure the routers and ASAs in such a way that if any one device fails or one of the Internet connections goes down, business will continue as usual.
Below are just some of my questions to help me ensure I am heading down the correct path:
--Will the IP addresses on the point-to-point links between our routers and the ISP come from our block of IP addresses, or will they be separate /30 links that the ISP provides? (Again, I have not had a chance to speak to the vendor)
--Will the iBGP link "A" require the use of public IP addresses or can private IPs be used? Besides configuring iBGP on these routers, is a First Hop Redundancy Protocol configured here as well?
--Should there be routed links between R1 and FW2, and R2 and FW1? Does that overly complicate the design without any real value added?
--Would OSPF or EIGRP typically be configured for links B, C & D to enable the redundancy desired between the firewalls and routers?
--What is the best practice for determining outbound traffic flow from the layer 3 switches (6509s configured as a VSS) to the two ASAs?
Any assistance is greatly appreciated.
Mike

Hi there
first of all you need in your design to me sure that traffic flow inbound and outbound to be aligned end to end
answeres to your questions are per below:
--Will the IP addresses on the point-to-point links between our routers and the ISP come from our block of IP addresses, or will they be separate /30 links that the ISP provides? (Again, I have not had a chance to speak to the vendor)
No dose not need and ask the ISP to provide you with their own IPs for the p2p links ( to avoid wasting your public IPs )
--Will the iBGP link "A" require the use of public IP addresses or can private IPs be used? Besides configuring iBGP on these routers, is a First Hop Redundancy Protocol configured here as well?
No you can use private IPs
--Should there be routed links between R1 and FW2, and R2 and FW1? Does that overly complicate the design without any real value added?
it is better here to use a L2 shared VLAN ( switch ) for those interfaces to get FHRP of the routers and failover of the FWs working as expected
--Would OSPF or EIGRP typically be configured for links B, C & D to enable the redundancy desired between the firewalls and routers?
if you are using HSRP/VRRP between the routers and using failover between the FWs then using a shared L2 vlan as suggested above will be required without IGP such as EIGRP also the link between the firewalls used for FW failover is not like the one used between the routers "dose not need routing"
--What is the best practice for determining outbound traffic flow from the layer 3 switches (6509s configured as a VSS) to the two ASAs?
if you put the ASA FWs in failover mode then the IP address of th eprimary/active ASA FW will be used for your static routes in the L3 switches to point to and this IP will be used by the secondary FW in the case of failover situation "transparent and automatic "
hope this help
if helpful rate

LMS Prime: Disabling Alterts for BRI Interfaces

Hello,
i revceive a lot of Alerts of BRI Interfaces on a router.
EVENT ID               = 000072X
TIME                   = Tue 08-Nov-2011 16:06:44 CET
STATUS                 = Active
SEVERITY               = Critical
MANAGED OBJECT         = 192.168.25.4
MANAGED OBJECT TYPE     = Routers
EVENT DESCRIPTION       = OperationallyDown::Component=IF-192.168.25.4/36 [BR0/0/0:1];ComponentClass=Interface;ComponentEventCode=1075;AdminStatus=UP;DuplexMode=FULLDUPLEX;OperStatus=DOWN;MaxSpeed=64000;Type=DS0;Mode=NORMAL;IsFlapping=false;InterfaceCode=CODEUNKNOWN;LastChang
NOTIFICATION ORIGINATOR = Fault Management Module
how can i get rid of them?
i already searched in Monitor > Fault Settings > Setup > Threshold Settings
but i didn't found where i can disable Operationally Down messages for certain interfaces.
thanks
alex

Hi Michel,
i tried to modify the tpmgr-param.conf file and added this entry IFDescrPattern-.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1045 *~Bearer Channel*. But still I receive the messages.
#This is an example of how to restrict the creation of ports for a
#specific sysObjectId based on the ifType:
#IFTypePattern-SwitchPort.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.501 53
IFDescrPattern-.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1045 *~Bearer Channel*
# Add Fiber Channel port (56) for MDS devices
IFTypePattern-SwitchPort.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.12.3.1.3.380 6|26|56|62|69|117
IFTypePattern-SwitchPort.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.12.3.1.3.376 6|26|56|62|69|117
IFTypePattern-SwitchPort.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.12.3.1.3.375 6|26|56|62|69|117
IFTypePattern-SwitchPort.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.12.3.1.3.414 6|26|56|62|69|117
IFTypePattern-SwitchPort.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.12.3.1.3.411 6|26|56|62|69|117
IFTypePattern-SwitchPort.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.12.3.1.3.442 6|26|56|62|69|117
IFTypePattern-SwitchPort.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.12.3.1.3.612 6|26|56|62|69|117
IFTypePattern-SwitchPort.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.12.3.1.3.719 6|26|56|62|69|117
IFTypePattern-SwitchPort.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.475 6|26|56|62|69|117
IFTypePattern-SwitchPort.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.407 6|26|56|62|69|117

Recommended wifi router for Y2 tab 13?

At the moment, I have an old wifi "g" class router that's capable of about 50 Mbit/s (if I interpreted the specifications correctly). I see that new "n" class routers, as well as Yoga tablets, are capable of about 600 Mbit/s - that seems a great improvement. Could anyone recommend some particular model that works well and stable with Yoga tablets?
I've tried googling them and reading Amazon reviews, but I'm not much smarter after that... Some models I've looked at (I'm aware these support even better speeds than "n", but that seems a better and more future proof investment than pure "n" router):
TP Link Archer C7 - cheaper but said to be less reliable and slower than competition
Asus RT-AC68 - a lot of praise, but also a lot of (bad) 1 and 2 star reviews
Asus RT-AC87 - again a lot of praise, but also a lot of people with issues
Netgear R7000 - again mixed reviews and allegedly particularly bad support from manufacturer
I would be happy with just a reasonable speed improvement (for example, currently I can't stream any high definition movies and even just browsing folders on the other machine in local network is noticably slow) and I won't connect many devices simultaneously (typically 1 to 3).
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi DigiMagic,
The prices of routers at the end of the day depends on the functionality which you are looking for. Example some routers have guest mode, kids mode, supports USB / NAS, etc etc.
Therefore at the end of the day, it would depend what will you be using the router for. As for myself, I have 2 access point at home due to my weak WLAN router and I am planning to get one which is dual band together with AC to ensure future proofing...
Hope that helps =D
Check out the Community Knowledge Base for hints and tips.
Did someone help you today? Press the star on the left to thank them with a Kudo!
If you find a post helpful and it answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution"!
X240 | 8GB RAM | 512GB Samsung SSD

Best router for my network

Hi, I have a PowerMac G4 (dual processor) with no wireless option and a PowerBookG4 with airport card, I've been told to get a router in order to have both computers working with Internet at the same time. I bought an Airport Express, but definitely, I need a router, I know that. I just want if somebody can tell me what is the best router for my computers. I've been reading about them, they are G Routers, N Routers, wireless, wired, etc. Before I buy one, I want to be sure I am buying a right one.
Thanks a lot.

Duane,
You have lost me now.
DSL modem from Interent provider is setup as a bridge.
The ethernet cable can be connected directly to the Express and provides me with network and Internet.
1. Create a wireless Network
2. There is a choice in the Express to "Connect using Ethernet".
3. Connection Sharing set to "Share a Public IP Address"
4. Manually put in the IP, Subnet, and Router address assigned by your ISP.
Works just fine for me. I have been doing this for many years.
I also have set it up like I mentioned above.
Cheap hub. Plug in the DSL modem in bridge mode to the hub. Plug in the Express to the hub.
Setup the Express as outlined above. Same thing with an Extreme or a TC...
Again, works for me..
You say NO DHCP service for Ethernet Clients. OK... Put in a static IP and you shouldn't have any problems.
Joseph Kriz

Router for small business Internet connection

One of our clients recently switched ISPs to Speakeasy who installed a Hatteras HN 407 bridge. We have had Internet connectivity problems using their SonicWall 3060 firewall, and we experienced similar problems when attempting to use a newer Sonicwall TZ180. We temporarily installed a Linksys W54GT router, which has been working perfectly; however, we would like to have a more robust router for their 25 user network - additional security options, performance, VPN, two WAN connections, etc. Can you recommend a small business router with 2 WAN connections? This customer has a business ethernet 3Mbps (up and down) Internet connection, uses an online medical scheduling program, normally has 10 - 20 uses using the Internet connection and will be installing a backup DSL line that we would like to use for load balancing.

Our recommendation for Dual WAN would be RV082 This would be the prefect VPN router for small Business and if you are looking for more ports on the Ethernet, then we would recommend the RV016

7600 as Backbone router for MPLS core

I have 7600's and 7500's in my backbone and 7200's on the edge. My question is that when I look at the feature navigator the 7600 with Sup 720 is missing a lot of basic features required to be a core router of an MPLS Backbone. Features like Traffic engineering fast reroute, MPLS enabled Netflow are missing on this platform, is this platform not a good candidate to be a Backbone router for a service provider offering MPLS services??? 7500 on the other hand it seems 7500 seems to have support for the MPLS related features.

Not sure what version you where looking at but...
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9_WAN-M), Version 12.2(18)SXF, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 1986-2005 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Sat 10-Sep-05 01:18 by ccai
Image text-base: 0x40101040, data-base: 0x42D60000
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(17r)S2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
BOOTLDR: s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9_WAN-M), Version 12.2(18)SXF, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
CASAN_Core1 uptime is 1 week, 4 hours, 9 minutes
Time since CASAN_Core1 switched to active is 1 week, 4 hours, 8 minutes
System returned to ROM by power cycle (SP by power on)
System image file is "disk0:s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF.bin"
This product contains cryptographic features and is subject to United
States and local country laws governing import, export, transfer and
use. Delivery of Cisco cryptographic products does not imply
third-party authority to import, export, distribute or use encryption.
Importers, exporters, distributors and users are responsible for
compliance with U.S. and local country laws. By using this product you
agree to comply with applicable laws and regulations. If you are unable
to comply with U.S. and local laws, return this product immediately.
A summary of U.S. laws governing Cisco cryptographic products may be found at:
http://www.cisco.com/wwl/export/crypto/tool/stqrg.html
If you require further assistance please contact us by sending email to
[email protected].
cisco CISCO7609 (R7000) processor (revision 1.1) with 983008K/65536K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID FOX092307Q5
SR71000 CPU at 600Mhz, Implementation 0x504, Rev 1.2, 512KB L2 Cache
Last reset from power-on
SuperLAT software (copyright 1990 by Meridian Technology Corp).
X.25 software, Version 3.0.0.
Bridging software.
TN3270 Emulation software.
1 SIP-200 controller .
1 Virtual Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface
74 Gigabit Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interfaces
1917K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
8192K bytes of packet buffer memory.
65536K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size 512K).
Configuration register is 0x2102
CASAN_Core1#
CASAN_Core1(config)#mpls traffic-eng ?
auto-bw auto-bw parameters
fast-reroute fast-reroute parameters
link-management Link Management configuration
logging Trap logging configuration
path-selection Path Selection Configuration
reoptimize Reoptimization parameters
signalling Traffic Engineering Signalling Parameters
topology Topology Database Configuration
tunnels Traffic Engineering tunnels

Route for dual interface

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for