Routing of incoming traffic

Hi all,
I have a WRT54G router.
I have an internet address pointing to my router. Can anyone tell me how i route the incoming request to a particular computer. Fow example the internet address is http://www.myaddress.com (which routes to my router at a static ip address) i want it routed to a webserver on my internal network named www .
I had this setup on my old router but cannot find the settings to do this with this router.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Dave.

I think you need to enable "Advanced Routing" on your Router to do that work.
Click Here how to enable Advanced Routing on your router.

Similar Messages

Local router blocking incoming remote assistance request

I have a user who recently moved. they received new equipment from their ISP. I use to be able to make remote assistance connections to their computer using a popular system center configuration manager remote tool. Now i can't get past the handshake when i try to connect. If he has split tunneling enabled would the new router block incoming traffic? I know by default most of the router's firewall will block all incoming traffic (if enabled). does this apply to VPN traffic?

Hi, if the VPN terminates on an IOS router, then the split tunneling does not "block" anything. It simply decides which traffic is sent through the tunnel and which traffic is sent in clear text (as in Internet traffic).
If the router has ACLs on the outside interface, that could be blocking the traffic (even VPN traffic).
Make sure the desired traffic is part of the split tunneling rule and that if there's an ACL, it allows the traffic to pass.

RV-082 Router Incoming traffic allow

We are using Cisco Router RV-082
We want to allow incoming traffic ONLY to our remote office on specific port. Is it possible to configure our router to allow only traffic from specific IP address?
Please help me
Thanks in advance!

Hello,
To accomplish what you are trying to do, you will need to create two inbound rules. One denying all traffic from all sources and another one allowing all traffic from the WAN port with the source IP as the IP you want to allow.
Here is a document explaining how to create the access rules.
http://sbkb.cisco.com/CiscoSB/ukp.aspx?vw=1&docid=214b9e138807474cba39cda82212f509_Adding_Deleting_an_IPv4_access_Rule.xml&pid=2&respid=0&snid=4&dispid=0&cpage=search
I hope this helps.

British Telecom BT 220v router blocking incoming http access ?

(Partly in response to Neil's suggested solution to my incoming traffic problem, in thread 'Wake when the modem detects a ring ...' )
I am assured by my ISP (BT or British Telecom: previously able to give good advice on my non-Windoze, non-Explorer, non-USB configuration, so stuck with them) that there is no firewall on my BT 220V router and that there is no blocking or filtering of incoming traffic by BT for domestic (or business) customers.
However, inspection of the router configuration and BT's own Quick Start guide reveals that IP filtering can indeed be set up, the default appearing to be that filtering is Enabled for inbound traffic.
The latest BT tech-help person ensured me that these are 'factory settings' which cannot be changed (and indeed I can't and don't want to), but did not know what they do. No doubt they are for security & firewall purposes: anyone know what kind of traffic they filter, and has anyone had this problem (no external access to shared folders or personal web site folders, timeouts rather than 404 errors) with a 220v ?
I've been round every other possible explanation and this is all that is left. Completely stuck otherwise.
iBook G4, 256MB ram, Aiport Extreme, built-in ethernet, 133MHz Mac OS X (10.3.9)

I'll shed some light -- if you try this in a forum OTHER than an iPhone forum, perhaps you may get more responses.

RV016 Router Allow All Traffic For Outside IP

Hi,
I need to configure the firewall to allow all traffice for an IP address of a sever. What steps in the router do i need to configure this? This is a cloud based voip server and we have IP phones and we need to add an IP address of the phone server to allow all traffic for that IP.
thanks.

Hi Jonathan,
I have a similar problem with VOIP traffic being dropped by my new RV016 v3 router.
I have created one Firewall Rule, to allow ALL traffic from the external VOIP PBX provider (single IP) to connect to the internal VOIP phones, which have assigned addresses in a small IP Address range (eg. 10.1.2.50 - 10.1.2.59)
The Aastra VOIP phones continually loose their registration wtih the cloud-based PBX. If you make an outgoing call, it will work, but the PBX will lose connection with the phone, 3 or 4 minutes after you hang up, and will mark it as offline. Incoming calls made within the 3 or 4 minutes will get through, but after that they go right to voicemail on the PBX system.
We used to have an RV016 v2 router and VOIP traffic worked OK, with a similar Firewall Rule. We replaced the v2 router because its CPU crashed.
I tested the VOIP traffic with a WRT160 router with minimal Firewall Rules, and it works OK, as long as SIP-ALG is turned Off. We want to use the RV016 because it provides a larger number of ports for our LAN.
Any suggestions ?
Kirk

HSRP on SVI. How is incoming traffic affected?

Let's say I have two distribution routers with SVI's using HSRP. Router 5 is the active router for the SVI for VLAN 5 and Router 6 is in standby (lower priority is set). Would incoming traffic be balanced between the two routers or all go through Router 5? I heard somewhere that only outbound traffic will go through the active router but with incoming traffic it could go to either SVI on the routers. Why is this so? This is the typical hierarchical model, core -> dist -> access.

Hi,
When you deploy HSRP your PCs etc normally use the
the virtual IP adress as their default gateway.
The virtual IP address is handeled by the ACTIVE router
in your case Router 5.
Router 6 will only become ACTIVE in the event of router 5 failing.
If you want to look at load balancing you could use GLBP as you
first hop router method.
Here are a couuple of link to look at.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/hot-standby-router-protocol-hsrp/10583-62.html#topic1
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipapp_fhrp/configuration/12-4/fhp-12-4-book.html
Regards
Alex

SonicWall SourceNAT VPN setup as default route for all traffic!

Hi,OK hope someone can help with this mess.....Our customer has been taken over by a US company who have said all outgoing internet traffic must go via their data centre. They want us to create an IPSEC vpn from our SonicWALL TZ215 to them then route all traffic locally via this VPN.In principle this didn't sound too bad. Then there were some more options:Our local subnet 172.x.x.x has to be NAT'd to a single /32 address. 192.x.x.131They also require our destination network to be set as 0.0.0.0. as they wont specify the range at the datacenter.I have managed to get the VPN up but using the the NAT address as my local subnet and using the option on the SonicWALL "Use this VPN Tunnel as default route for all Internet traffic" on the remote network. Phase 1 and Phase 2 work ok. The problem i now have is i need to route all LAN traffic...
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

Hi Norbert,
I am sorry to say that configuring routes in Azure Virtual network is not supported. I recommend you to submit your reuqirement on Azure Feedback and hope it would be released soon:
http://feedback.azure.com/forums/217313-networking-dns-traffic-manager-vpn-vnet
Best regards,
Susie
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

Route only some traffic trough VPN

Is it possible to route only certain traffic through VPN and other through default gw route?
I have tried to google it, i didn't find anything usefull.
Thank you

Replace 'eth1' with 'ppp0' or 'tun0' or whatever your VPN interface is:
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php? … 63#p497763
Then for the ports you want to send via the VPN, add a rule like this:
iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport XX -m state --state NEW -j MARK --set-mark 102
Last edited by fukawi2 (2009-09-21 23:09:11)

WTR54GS Incoming Traffic

I just got a WTR54GS. I am pretty happy with it. Nice little travel device. Will be very handy in hotels on the road. My goal is to firewall off my private network with the WTR54GS. This seems to work fine, except that if I look at the log I still see incoming traffic that is marked "allowed". I am not sure why that would be. I want to define that all ports on the device are closed to incoming traffic, or at least be able to define what that incoming traffic is and that it is "ok". Does anyone know how to block all incoming traffic, or if it is necessary, how I can figure out what this traffic is for? Here is a snip from the log of the device; [2000-01-01 00:38:30], From:[209.18.38.8] to port: [1880], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:38:03], From:[72.14.207.99] to port: [1983], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:38:03], From:[151.109.24.90] to port: [1404], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:38:03], From:[66.150.96.119] to port: [1982], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:38:03], From:[151.109.24.90] to port: [1403], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:50], From:[151.109.24.90] to port: [1025], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:41], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1979], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:40], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1978], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:40], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1977], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:30], From:[209.18.38.32] to port: [1849], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:20], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1976], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:19], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1975], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:19], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1974], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:19], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1972], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:19], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1973], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:19], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1971], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:19], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1970], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:19], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1969], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:19], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1968], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:19], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1967], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:19], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1966], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:19], From:[216.227.223.44] to port: [1965], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:19], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1964], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:19], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1963], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:18], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1962], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:08], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1961], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:08], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1960], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:08], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1959], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:08], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1958], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:08], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1957], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:08], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1956], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:08], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1955], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:07], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1954], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:07], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1953], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:07], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1952], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:05], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1951], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:04], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1950], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:04], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1949], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:04], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1948], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:04], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1947], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:04], From:[66.161.11.90] to port: [1867], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:04], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1946], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:04], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1945], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:03], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1944], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:03], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1943], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:03], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1942], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:03], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1941], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:03], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1940], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:03], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1939], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:03], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1938], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:02], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1937], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:02], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1936], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:36:01], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1935], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:35:45], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1933], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:35:44], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1932], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:35:43], From:[64.154.82.6] to port: [1883], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:35:32], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1931], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:35:28], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1930], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:35:28], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1930], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:35:12], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1929], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:35:12], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1928], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:35:00], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1927], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:35:00], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1926], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:35:00], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1925], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:35:00], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1924], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:59], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1923], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:59], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1922], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:59], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1921], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:59], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1920], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:59], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1919], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:59], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1918], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:59], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1917], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:59], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1916], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:59], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1915], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:59], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1914], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:59], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1913], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:58], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1912], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:58], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1911], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:57], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1910], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:54], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1908], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:53], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1907], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:50], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1906], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:50], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1905], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:50], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1904], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:50], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1903], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:50], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1902], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:50], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1901], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:50], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1900], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:50], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1899], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:49], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1898], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:49], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1897], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:49], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1896], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:49], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1895], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:42], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1894], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:42], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1893], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:40], From:[208.74.204.125] to port: [1892], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:34:14], From:[72.14.207.104] to port: [1891], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:33:42], From:[72.14.207.104] to port: [1889], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:33:32], From:[206.190.50.59] to port: [1888], [Allowed] [2000-01-01 00:33:31], From:[209.191.86.75] to port: [1887], [Allowed] Thanks for any and all info, tips, hints, and general knowledge. -- garskof

Thanks for the info. Yes, I know "what the boxes are" as in where they are on the network. What I do not know is why they are opening ports on the WTR54GS. I guess I should have been more specific. I do not have wireless enabled. I have a wired network in, and a wired network out to my laptop. I want to be able to protect my "private" intranet created by the WTR54GS by closing all ports, but it appears the device can not do that, which I find surprising. What am I missing? Why is this device accepting this traffic? What is it doing with the traffic? What is the traffic, what is its purpose? These are the questions I am trying to get my hands around. Any ideas anyone? Thanks -- garskof

Block all incoming traffic and Active FTP

Will setting the firewall to Block all incoming traffic break Active FTP Connections?
The firewall will normally dynamically create exceptions for the Connection using the Application Layer Gateway, but will the profile override these?

Hi TribleTrouble,
Do you have any issue about FTP active mode?
If the clients are part of your domain, push the FTP firewall rules via GPO to your clients allowing FTP inbound sockets
netsh advfirewall firewall add rule name="File Transfer Program" protocol=TCP profile=domain Program=C:\Windows\System32\ftp.exe dir=in action=allow
netsh advfirewall firewall add rule name="File Transfer Program" protocol=UDP profile=domain Program=C:\Windows\System32\ftp.exe dir=in action=allow
For Windows 7, the entire networking stack was rewritten and several security measures were taken to further secure Windows.
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Allow incoming traffic through iTunes?

All of a sudden every time I open iTunes it asks if incoming traffic should be allowed. I checked my firewall settings and it is listed under allowed applications. Am I missing something? This start happening about a week ago.
Thanks.

When you installed 7.6 this started happening. The fix that I have found thanks to these forums, was to download itunes from the download site, not the software update. Once I reinstalled it stopped asking for deny/allow.

Split Tunnel VPN and routing public ip traffic

Hi Everyone,
I have my split tunnel vpn working well but I need to make an adjustment. We have a few systems in the "cloud" and we only allow access from our corporate WAN IP to those servers. I need to be able to access those servers via VPN connection to the office. I added that public IP subnet to my interesting traffic and the vpn client is sending the traffic across the VPN as expected. The issue is that it somehow drops out inside the firewall it seems. Almost like it doesn't know how to route that request back out to the internet using it's own default gateway. Any thoughts as to what I may be missing, here is some of the relevant code
same-security-traffic permit intra-interface
----Interesting Traffic------
access-list vpnpool standard permit 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0
access-list vpnpool standard permit 10.31.26.0 255.255.255.0
access-list vpnpool standard permit 10.31.61.0 255.255.255.0
access-list vpnpool standard permit 10.31.3.128 255.255.255.192
access-list vpnpool standard permit 10.31.40.128 255.255.255.240
access-list vpnpool standard permit 10.31.40.64 255.255.255.192
access-list vpnpool standard permit 50.57.0.0 255.255.0.0 -- Network of cloud servers
---Natting----------
global (outside) 1 71.174.57.78
global (dmz) 1 interface
nat (inside) 0 access-list 101
nat (inside) 1 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0
nat (qa) 1 200.200.200.0 255.255.255.0
nat (dmz) 1 10.1.11.0 255.255.255.0
nat (dmz2) 1 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
---Rules and Gateway-------
access-group inbound in interface outside
access-group dmz in interface dmz
route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 71.174.57.1 1
---VPN-----
group-policy xxx-remote internal
group-policy xxx-remote attributes
wins-server value 10.1.1.5
dns-server value 10.1.1.5 10.1.1.6
vpn-idle-timeout 60
vpn-tunnel-protocol IPSec l2tp-ipsec webvpn
ipsec-udp enable
split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
split-tunnel-network-list value vpnpool
default-domain value xxx.local
split-dns value xxxx.local
service-type remote-access
tunnel-group xxx-vpn type remote-access
tunnel-group xxx-vpn general-attributes
address-pool vpnpool
authentication-server-group (outside) RADIUS
authentication-server-group (dmz) RADIUS
default-group-policy xxx-remote
tunnel-group xxx-vpn ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key xxxxx

That was my mistake, I am mixing up code here. The fun of switching between new and old ASA code as well as routers
Let's do it this way, this should fix the problem. Put the NAT command the way it was as follows:
nat (Outside) 1 10.1.10.0 255.255.255.0
Now we add a NAT0 for the Outside interface. You can reuse the ACL we made if you want or make a new one, your call since you have to administrate it.
no access-list VPN-NAT
access-list VPN-NAT0 permit ip 10.1.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0
nat (Outside) 0 access-list VPN-NAT0
Now, this should properly NAT the traffic going to the Internet while excluding the traffic destined for your 10.0.0.0/8 subnet using the Nat 0.
Sorry for the round about fix, but that should take care of it.

Configuring QoS for FIOS Router MI-424WR: Traffic Priority and Shaping

Please only read on if you are an experienced internet user familiar with setting the advanced QoS and Firewall settings for the MI-424WR and make use of wireless adaptors from a PC to provide connectivity.
This is my first post and my first week since I moved from Time Warner Cable over to FIOS for iNet (plus HDTV and phone).     While all my services work, the router as delivered and setup is not optimum for internet quality of service. Instead it was probably out of the box optimized for HDTV and telephone to satisfy most customers and reduce support overhead.   The average FIOS consumer is multimedia sensitive, but that is not so in my genre of internet consumer.   Here in lies the core of my reason for seeking help from like minded and experienced users in this community.
One of the main driving forces in my switching to FIOS was to improve my multiplayer gaming experience where ultra low ping latency and high upload data rates dramatically affect the quality of connection and thus gameplay.    The cable internet service from TimeWarner was providing solid 2MB/1MB down/up data rates with no issues like what Im having now with FIOS.   Again the reason for the switch was both financial and in hope of gaining better data rates and quality of service.   Now with FIOS Im getting about 24/15 down/up data rate on the Extreme FIOS 25/25 plan when measured from my house to Los Angeles server (50 miles away) via Speedtest.net or DslReports.com/tests.     Latency wise, the ping has gone down from 150 to 50ms when measured to my friends who I connect to online that are on the East coast.   The data rate and latency has greatly improved in going from Cable to FIOS.   So far, so good.
Where the problem shows up now, is that now I get an internet "hiccup" every 5-10 minutes that lasts about 1/2 to 2 seconds.   For the average internet user that just streams multimedia or cruises on the net; this is probably undetectable or noticed.   I never had this problem over the same PCs connected wirelessly to my DLINK DGL-4500 Gaming Router when my ISP was TimeWarner's cable service.    Now, using the FIOS and MI-424WR router with everythings being the same; Im experiencing this degregation in quality of service.    Even putting the PC's IP into the DMZ doesnt make any difference, so it is not related to port forwarding.    The issue is squarely in the lap of FIOS and this router as delivered and configured.    This is where the "game" is a foot, and where I need expertise in an area Im new to.
I am not new to being hands on with inet trouble shooting asI have been setting up my own home network (I work from home over VPN to work) for decades; I would like to leverage the skills of those who are experts in the area that I think can address this issue.   That being QoS and the other device class mechanisms of this router.   Its my guess that this periodic hiccup can be minimized and even eliminated using these advanced features of this all-in-one TV/iNet/Tele router.
With that context being laid down, this hiccup doesnt show up if:
a. I connect two PCs connected to the same ethernet hub of the MI-424WR (traffic just over the LAN and not WAN)
b. When I was on Cable with my own gaming router wirelessly DHCP connected to my PC and using port forwarding or using the DMZ.
The hiccup does exist when:
a.  Going from internet through the MI-424WR to the wireless DHCP connected PC with port forwarding
b. Even putting the wireless DHCP connected PC into the MI-424WR's DMZ has no effect
I did read the manual and tried some QoS pritority and shaping and managed to reduce how often the hiccup occured, but I was just making guesses at the settings.   I put in the IP for the PCs I use for my gaming applications (which are very ping and jitter sensitive) into the QoS priority (value 7) and shaping GUI.    Im hoping someone with experience can tell me exactly how to use it and what settings to input.   Im not clear on the device and connection types offered in the QoS menus.
Another thing, is I couldnt find settings for the turning on/off the ICMP echo.   But I assume this is on because it can be pinged by folks on the net to my WAN IP.
Here is the manual for the Verizon provided M424WR router (Current Version of firmware: 20.10.7)
download link
Here are the QoS traffic priority and shaping values Ive been experimenting with:
Click to view QoS Traffic Priority
Click to view QoS Traffic Shaping
And why it matters to have a solid and stable inet connection for internet gaming? The hiccup causes slewing or jitter which equates to positional errors in the 3D world that ruins the smooth gameplay that is needed for high end gaming.
Heres a snapshot of me flying the wing of another flight simmer who is on the East coast and me on the West coast.
Click to view
Thank you in advance.
Thomas "AV8R"
MSEE

TMAS wrote:
the router as delivered and setup is not optimum for internet quality of service. Instead it was probably out of the box optimized for HDTV and telephone to satisfy most customers and reduce support overhead.
That's not accurate. VZ telephone service does not go through the Actiontec. Also, there are no default settings for QOS in the Actiontec since QOS is rarely needed with FIOS upload speeds.
TMAS wrote:I get an internet "hiccup" every 5-10 minutes that lasts about 1/2 to 2 seconds.
   You should not be experiencing periodic "hiccups". Something is clearly amiss.
TMAS wrote:
With that context being laid down, this hiccup doesnt show up if:a. I connect two PCs connected to the same ethernet hub of the MI-424WR (traffic just over the LAN and not WAN)
The hiccup does exist when:
a.  Going from internet through the MI-424WR to the wireless DHCP connected PC with port forwarding
b. Even putting the wireless DHCP connected PC into the MI-424WR's DMZ has no effect
Lets see. The issue shows up on a wireless connection, but not a wired connection. You think this is a QOS issue and not a wireless issue why? Have you tried changing the wireless channel? It very possible you have neighbors on the same channel. Is the DGL-4500 wireless still on? Could that be interfering?TMAS wrote:
Another thing, is I couldnt find settings for the turning on/off the ICMP echo.
The settting to enable/disable ICMP echo is on the Firewall/Remote Administration page.
TMAS wrote:
Here are the QoS traffic priority and shaping values Ive been experimenting with:Click to view QoS Traffic Priority
Click to view QoS Traffic Shaping
The traffic proirity settings you linked are applied only to your wireless connections. QOS between the router and your wireless PC will only serve to prioritize traffic between the router and that PC and have no affect on your internet traffic. Assuming you are not running browsers, VOIP and other traffic from that PC while you're gaming, then that will not accomplish anything. i.e. You're giving your only traffic highest priority, but that traffic is not competing with anything (except other nearby wireless connections on the same channel).
On the traffic shaping screenshot, you have broadband ethernet checked, but according to your other thread, your WAN connection is Broadband Coax, not Broadband ethernet.

Cisco 7609 router received higher traffic than upstream provider router is sending

Hi all,
I have a Cisco 7609 router that connects to our upstream provider router using 3rd party DWDM Fiber backhaul provider.
The upstream provider router is a Juniper router that had capped our port speed to 1.1Gbps, the backhaul provider didn't capped our port speed and the maximum speed is 2Gbps since it's a 2x1Gbps port channel interface.
I have noticed that our 7609 router able to receive traffic that exceeds 1.1Gbps, and the highest traffic able to received is 1.3Gbps and more.
I have crossed checked the MRTG graph provided by our upstream provider as well as our PRTG graph and indeed we are receiving higher bandwidth than our upstream provider is sending.
I'd like to know if anyone know how it is possible to receive traffic that is higher than what the neighbor router is sending?
Regards

Hi at all,
We found a solution for this Problem !!
We always and always got this error:
%PQUICC-1-LOSTCARR: Unit 0, lost carrier. Transceiver problem?
The problem was the cable! The following pin-out is required:
                                        1 ----- 1
                                        2 ----- 2
                                        3 ----- 6
                                        4 ----- 5
                                        5 ----- 4
                                        6 ----- 3
                                        7 ----- 7
                                        8 ----- 8
We used this and the fault has disappeared!!
The only problem that still exists:
After the first connection the router must be rebooted because otherwise no more additional session is established.
Thanks for all answers.
Regards,
Mario

3230 Mobile Access Router not Passing Traffic across WMICs

I'm unable to pass traffic across the WMICs. I've assigned the BVIs ip addresses in the same subnet and I'm seeing the devices associated. I attached the configurations.
Thanks,

A ruggedized router in a flexible and compact design, ideally suited to create mobile networks in and around vehicles.
Here is the URL for the furthere information for grounding in the vehicales and description :
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps272/prod_presentation0900aecd802948c0.pdf
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps272/ps4375/index.html

Routing of incoming traffic

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for