RSVP Hello for Fast Reroute

Hi,
i am trying to set up TE tunnels with Fast Reroute protection. As i am using FastEthernet and GigabitEthernet links i need to use RSVP Hello for link or node failure detection.
I have a little problem understanding and properly configuring the rsvp hello feature. The topology looks as follows:
PE1 - P1 - PE2
  |                |
P3 ----------- P4
I am trying to set up fast reroute to  protect the connection PE1-P1-PE2 with backup path PE1-P3-P4-PE2. Both primary and backup tunnels are set up and working. I configure RSVP Hello on the link between PE1 and P1 with following commands on  PE1 and P1:
PE1#configure terminal
PE1(config)#interface Fastethernet 0/0
PE1(config-if)ip rsvp signalling hello
PE1(config-if)ip rsvp signalling hello refresh interval 50
P1#configure terminal
P1(config)#interface Fastethernet 0/0
P1(config-if)ip rsvp signalling hello
P1(config-if)ip rsvp signalling hello refresh interval 50
After issuing the sh ip rsvp hello instance detail command on PE1 i can see that the RSVP hello session is active:
Neighbor 195.10.3.1 (router ID: 3.3.3.3)  Source  195.10.3.254
    Type: Active    (sending requests)
    I/F:  FastEthernet0/0
    State:   Up        (Since: 2012 January Thursday 12 00:14:22 )
    Clients: Fast Reroute
    LSPs protecting: 1
    Missed acks: 4, IP DSCP: 0x30
    Refresh Interval (msec)
      Configured: 50
However on the P1 router the output shows different values:
Neighbor 195.10.3.254 (router ID: 33.33.33.33)  Source  195.10.3.1
    Type: Active    (sending requests)
    I/F:  FastEthernet0/0
    State:   Up        (Since: 2012 January Wednesday 11 23:43:18 )
    Clients: ReRoute
    LSPs protecting: 3
    Missed acks: 4, IP DSCP: 0x30
    Refresh Interval (msec)
      Configured: 2000
The configuration guide for IOS 12.2SR refers to active instances:
If a neighbor is unreachable when an LSP is ready  to be fast  rerouted, an active Hello instance is needed. Create an  active Hello  instance for each neighbor with at least one LSP in this  state.
and to passive instances:
Passive  Hello instances respond to Hello Request  messages (sending Ack  messages), but do not initiate Hello Request  messages and do not cause  LSPs to be fast rerouted.
At this point i am not sure if i configured the RSVP Hello properly. After shuting the interface FastEthernet 0/0 on P1 down i do get the backup tunnel active and rerouted, but the convergence time is too slow. I would expect the convergence time to be 4xRSVP Hello interval which is 4x50=200ms. However, the testing revealed the convergence time to be round 2,5 seconds. My goal is to get the convergence time under 300ms.
The question is, what is the actual difference between active and passive rsvp hello session? What does the Clients statement in the sh ip rsvp hello instance detail command mean and shoud i see the same interval on both ends of the link?
If you need any other specification, i will provide any other show command outputs necessary.
Thank you for any help or clarifiation.
Adrian

Adrian,
Would it be possible to post the relevant tunnel configurations from your PE routers? From what you described, I am not sure if you want to achieve an MPLS path protection, MPLS link protection (NHOP) or MPLS node protection (NNHOP) here.
Best regards,
Peter

Similar Messages

  • IP-Fast Reroute with MPLS remote LFA tunnels

    I have a simple ring network with 4 3600Xs with IP/MPLS 10 gig backbone between all units (with OSPF running in the core).  Per the 3600 design guide I turned on IPFRR under OSPF for fast reroute of traffic around faults.  I have a l3vpn on the 3600s that I'm using to test.  The FRR works quite well when the repair route is a ECMP (equal cost multipath) route, I don't even notice an interruption in ping between l3vpn sites when an 'active' link goes down.
    The issue arises when the repair route is a remote-LFA (loop free alternative) MPLS tunnel.  I've done a few tests, and the failover time when the repair route is a remote LFA tunnel is the same as when FRR isn't turned on at all, it's just the normal route convergence time and there is a significant traffic interruption (as compared to FRR when an ECMP route is the repair route).
    The thing is I'm not quite sure how even to diagnose this.  I was thinking that maybe the remote FLA tunnel was using the link that failed, so it in essence was 'down' as well, hence the traffic interruption as routing fully converged.  But I looked at the remote-LFA interfaces, and as much as I understand them they are taking the right path out of the router anyway (that is, away from the link that would fail in order to activate the remote-LFA route).
    Are there any resources or tips to help troubleshoot why these remote-LFA tunnel repair routes don't seem to be working well?

    Thanks for the reply Nagendra.  When you ask if I've seen the back path installed in RIB/FIB, I'm not exactly sure what you mean.  I do see repair paths referncing remote LFAs on both the 3600 that would be the source and the destination of the test traffic.  Like this:
      * 172.16.0.3, from 10.10.10.3, 01:55:50 ago, via TenGigabitEthernet0/2
          Route metric is 2, traffic share count is 1
          Repair Path: 10.10.10.4, via MPLS-Remote-Lfa40
    and on the other router:
      * 172.16.0.2, from 10.10.10.1, 01:56:34 ago, via TenGigabitEthernet0/1
          Route metric is 2, traffic share count is 1
          Repair Path: 10.10.10.2, via MPLS-Remote-Lfa32
    If you're looking for some specific command output, let me know.

  • MPLS TE Fast ReRoute

    Hi Experts,
    I'm just getting started with MPLS TE and wondering on how fast the "fast reroute" feature can be.
    I'm planning to create two tunnels for a specific traffic of my network, and looks like MPLS TE with FRR is the most reliable option if we are talking about a really 0% packet loss network.
    I saw on some documentations that with MPLS TE is possible to reroute the traffic with 50 ms of RTT  and no packet loss at all, considering that the backup tunnel is so reliable as the primary is.
    Is this true? I'm new on this subject so I would like to know more about what I could achieve in terms of high availability.
    Regards
    Paulo Varanda

    Hi,
    Yes MPLS-TE with FRR gives faster convergence in range of 50ms (usually 50ms is standard convergence time for SDH/Sonet network). But there are some pre-requisities for MPLS-TE FRR to provide that faster convergence.
    Tunnel Headend -- Router 1 --- Router 2 ---- Router 3--- Tunnel Tailend
                            -- Router 4 ---- Router 5----
    MPLS-TE FRR protects a particular link or a particular node.
    For link protection, the concept is to have a primary tunnel protected by a backup tunnel. The backup tunnel path should be on completely different and fault tolerant physical path when the primary tunnel path fails i.e. both the tunnels should not be in same SRLG links. In the above case if link between Router1-Router2-Router3 fails the tunnel should fallback over Router 4 and Router 5.
    Detecting the link or node goes down should require a keepalive mechanism, usually RSVP hellos are used to detect the failure.
    Node protection by default provides link protection. So when Router 2 goes down the traffic falls back over backup path.
    MPLS-TE FRR wokrs by pre-signalling LSP over both primary and secondary paths even before the failure occurs. In normal conditions (with multiple path-option), only when primary LSP on primary path goes down, LSP gets signalled over secondary path option.
    HTH
    Arun

  • Fast-Reroute on a ring with Gig Interface

    Hi,
    I'm trying to setup a fast-reroute option on a 4 routers ring connected through gige with OSPF.
    The main idea is to be able to use xconnect between A & B for normal route with a backup through C & D in case of Gig failure AB.
    I created two tunnel as follow on A
    interface Tunnel50
    ip unnumbered Loopback0
    tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng
    tunnel destination b.b.b.b
    tunnel mpls traffic-eng autoroute announce
    tunnel mpls traffic-eng priority 2 2
    tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-option 1 explicit name b-fast
    tunnel mpls traffic-eng fast-reroute node-protect
    interface Tunnel51
    ip unnumbered Loopback0
    tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng
    tunnel destination b.b.b.
    tunnel mpls traffic-eng autoroute announce
    tunnel mpls traffic-eng priority 5 5
    tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-option 10 explicit name b-low
    and configure A to B interfaces with
    mpls traffic-eng backup-path Tunnel51
    ip rsvp bandwidth
    router ospf
    mpls traffic-eng router-id Loopback0
    mpls traffic-eng area 0
    Same kind of conf on B side...
    Well, if I shutdown A to B interface, the fast-reroute doesn't seems to operate and the xconnect resume on a ospf convergence base latency.
    Should I also create tunnel A-C, A-D, B-C, B-D, ... like a full mesh ? or point to point on a ring AB, BC, CD, DA ?
    Thanks for your help.
    Laurent

    I tried a xconnect between br01 and br04.
    Routers are on a ring : br01(ge3/2)--(ge3/1)br03--br02--br04(ge3/2)--(ge3/1)br01
    tunnel50 is the straight route and tunnel 51 is the low route
    *Here the output from br04
    br04-7600-mtp02#show mpls traffic-eng tunnels brief
    Signalling Summary:
        LSP Tunnels Process:            running
        Passive LSP Listener:           running
        RSVP Process:                   running
        Forwarding:                     enabled
        Periodic reoptimization:        every 3600 seconds, next in 2803 seconds
        Periodic FRR Promotion:         Not Running
        Periodic auto-bw collection:    every 300 seconds, next in 103 seconds
    P2P TUNNELS/LSPs:
    TUNNEL NAME                      DESTINATION      UP IF      DOWN IF    STATE/PROT
    br04-7600-mtp02_t50              94.103.128.56    -         Gi3/2     up/up
    br04-7600-mtp02_t51              94.103.128.56    -         Gi3/1     up/up
    br01-7600-par01_t50              94.103.128.59    Gi3/2      -          up/up
    br01-7600-par01_t51              94.103.128.59    Gi3/1      -          up/up
    Displayed 2 (of 2) heads, 0 (of 0) midpoints, 2 (of 2) tails
    P2MP TUNNELS:
    Displayed 0 (of 0) P2MP heads
    P2MP SUB-LSPS:
    Displayed 0 P2MP sub-LSPs:
              0 (of 0) heads, 0 (of 0) midpoints, 0 (of 0) tails
    br04-7600-mtp02#show mpls traffic-eng fast-reroute database
    P2P Headend FRR information:
    Protected tunnel               In-label Out intf/label   FRR intf/label   Status
    Tunnel50                       Tun hd   Gi3/2:implicit-n Tu51:implicit-nu Ready
    P2P LSP midpoint frr information:
    LSP identifier                 In-label Out intf/label   FRR intf/label   Status
    P2MP Sub-LSP FRR information:
    *Sub-LSP identifier
    src_lspid[subid]->dst_tunid    In-label Out intf/label   FRR intf/label   Status
    * Sub-LSP identifier format: _[SubgroupID]->_
      Note: Sub-LSP identifier may be truncated.
      Use 'detail' display for the complete key.
    br04-7600-mtp02#show mpls traffic-eng tunnels backup
    br04-7600-mtp02_t51
      LSP Head, Admin: up, Oper: up
      Tun ID: 51, LSP ID: 35, Source: 94.103.128.59
      Destination: 94.103.128.56
      Fast Reroute Backup Provided:
        Protected i/fs: Gi3/2
        Protected LSPs/Sub-LSPs: 1, Active: 0
        Backup BW: any pool unlimited; inuse: 0 kbps
        Backup flags: 0x0
    *Here the output from br01
    br01-7600-par01#show mpls traffic-eng tunnels brief
    Signalling Summary:
        LSP Tunnels Process:            running
        Passive LSP Listener:           running
        RSVP Process:                   running
        Forwarding:                     enabled
        Periodic reoptimization:        every 3600 seconds, next in 2489 seconds
        Periodic FRR Promotion:         Not Running
        Periodic auto-bw collection:    every 300 seconds, next in 89 seconds
    P2P TUNNELS/LSPs:
    TUNNEL NAME                      DESTINATION      UP IF      DOWN IF    STATE/PROT
    br01-7600-par01_t50              94.103.128.59    -         Gi3/1     up/up
    br01-7600-par01_t51              94.103.128.59    -         Gi3/2     up/up
    br04-7600-mtp02_t50              94.103.128.56    Gi3/1      -          up/up
    br04-7600-mtp02_t51              94.103.128.56    Gi3/2      -          up/up
    Displayed 2 (of 2) heads, 0 (of 0) midpoints, 2 (of 2) tails
    P2MP TUNNELS:
    Displayed 0 (of 0) P2MP heads
    P2MP SUB-LSPS:
    Displayed 0 P2MP sub-LSPs:
              0 (of 0) heads, 0 (of 0) midpoints, 0 (of 0) tails
    br01-7600-par01#show mpls traffic-eng fast-reroute database
    P2P Headend FRR information:
    Protected tunnel               In-label Out intf/label   FRR intf/label   Status
    Tunnel50                       Tun hd   Gi3/1:implicit-n Tu51:implicit-nu Ready
    P2P LSP midpoint frr information:
    LSP identifier                 In-label Out intf/label   FRR intf/label   Status
    P2MP Sub-LSP FRR information:
    *Sub-LSP identifier
    src_lspid[subid]->dst_tunid    In-label Out intf/label   FRR intf/label   Status
    * Sub-LSP identifier format: _[SubgroupID]->_
      Note: Sub-LSP identifier may be truncated.
      Use 'detail' display for the complete key.
    br01-7600-par01#show mpls traffic-eng tunnels backup
    br01-7600-par01_t51
      LSP Head, Admin: up, Oper: up
      Tun ID: 51, LSP ID: 30, Source: 94.103.128.56
      Destination: 94.103.128.59
      Fast Reroute Backup Provided:
        Protected i/fs: Gi3/1
        Protected LSPs/Sub-LSPs: 1, Active: 0
        Backup BW: any pool unlimited; inuse: 0 kbps
        Backup flags: 0x0
    Thx,
    Laurent

  • Allow indexing service to index this disk for fast file searching

    Hello,
    I'm using Oracle on Win 2000, I have lately found out that the option "Compress drive to save disk space"
    is not supported in Oracle.
    When I've opened the drive specifications on the properties dialog, I found also another option called "Allow indexing service to index this disk for fast file searching".
    My question are;
    1. Should I turn it off?
    2. Same question when the indexed directories does not include Oracle files?
    3. Same question, when the indexing service is set to off?
    Thanks,
    Tal Olier ([email protected])

    If this is a production machine, I'd definitely turn this off. Hopefully, no one is going to be searching for particular files on a production server-- they'll know where to go. You probably don't want any unnecessary background processes using up CPU or RAM either.
    If this is a development machine, the developer may be searching for files with some frequency. If that's the case, it may be worth it to keep this service enabled.
    I'm not aware of any Oracle issues when this service is running, but I'm paranoid enough not to trust it on a production box. If you're running on a dev box, you shouldn't have problems, particularly if you're not indexing Oracle files.
    Justin

  • Fast Reroute on 7600 platform

    Hi,
    One quick enquiry, does 7600 platform support MPLS Fast Reroute.
    Practical inputs would be of immense help.
    Thanks
    Cheers
    ~sultan

    The MPLS Traffic EngineeringFast Reroute MIB provides Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)-based network management of the Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Fast Reroute (FRR) feature in Cisco IOS software.
    The Fast Reroute MIB has the following features:
    "Notifications can be created and queued.
    "Command-line interface (CLI) commands enable notifications, and specify the IP address to where the notifications will be sent.
    "The configuration of the notifications can be written into nonvolatile memory.
    Refer to MPLS Traffic EngineeringFast Reroute MIB section for more information
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/mpls/configuration/guide/mp_te_fast_rr_mib_ps6922_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1101191

  • Fast-reroute: failure detection on ATM

    Hi,
    I have read in Designing MPLS TE Networks book that in essence fast-reroute feature failure detection of under 50ms is possible on pure POS interfaces and not possible on ATM interfaces which might also be runnig over POS.
    I have noticed a command that had been available since 12.1T - "oam ais-rdi". According to this command description, it is possible to bring down ATM PVC after receiving one AIS indicating cell.
    Isn't that exactly how it works on POS?
    Was this Ciscopress book so much outdated or am I missing something?
    Thanks,
    David

    Hello,
    there is a major difference (on a ms time scale) in POS and in ATM AIS. With POS interfaces one utilizes the error indication in the SONET/SDH frame. This means the first frame after failure detection of end OR intermediate systems (muxer) will contain the error bits needed to bring down the interface and trigger fast reroute.
    If you look into an ATM solution, then only ATM equipment will be able to insert ATM cells for failure indication. This means a mux will not be able to indicate anything. Only ATM switches or end devices might "help" out, but for them failure detection is maybe bound to keepalives as well.
    So you MIGHT get very low recovery times, but you could also have failure conditions only detectable by keepalive mechanisms. The latter are slower than in POS.
    Once you are relying on keepalives you could also use subsecond keepalives with OSPF or ISIS to achieve pretty fast recovery times.
    Hope this helps! Please rate all posts.
    Regards, Martin

  • How do you run to Drives on the same screen. I installed a ssd and a hhd to my mac but i can only view the content of the drive only if i boot of that drive. Im try to have my ssd for fast boots and hhd for my music,movies etc. Please help.

    I installed a samsung 840 pro SSD to my primary slot and relocated my 1.5 TB HDD to a data double where my optical drive was. I transfered my apps and Mac OS X to my SSD for fast boots and all my itunes movies, music, Iphoto etc to my HDD. I rebooted off my SSD then seen all the data on my HHD itunes movies, music, iphotos etc i cannot view on my SSD. So my question is how do you view all the content on both the ssd and hdd on the same screen with having to boot off one or the other?

    No, what I'm saying is that once you boot into OSX, you should be able to see both drives listed.  If you don't then either OSX is hiding the other drive because it sees it as a boot drive and is trying to protect the contents from novice users or there's another problem.  If it's the first thing (i.e. it's a protection thing), then your only option would be to boot into the old drive, copy off all your personal data to an external backup drive, then reboot into the SSD and go into Disk Utilities and wipe/reformat the second drive so that you can see it as a regular secondary drive.  Then when you see it as that, you can copy your data back to it.
    Be carefull poking around in Disk Utility as you can easily lose your data.  It's possible the Mac just isn't mounting that second drive because it sees it as another boot drive.  Whatever you do, don't accidentally erase it without getting a copy of your data off of it because you obviously don't have that on your SSD now.

  • Acrobat 9.3.4 (or 9.3.3.177): Save As with Optimize for Fast Web View

    When I do a Save As with Optimize For Fast Web View checked, the saving stops and an Adobe Acrobat dialog displays:
         The document could not be saved. There was a problem reading this document (111).
    If I uncheck Optimize For Fast Web View, the Save As seems to work.
    Is there a way to have Fast Web View work with Save As?
    Acrobat.exe is version 9.3.4 (or 9.3.3.177 in the properties). The Acrobat.DLL version is 9.3.4.218.

    Thanks.  I did submit a report at the site.  I hope somebody reads it as this is a big problem for us.
    Thanks again.

  • I bought a new iMac today. I'm using migration assistant to move all my software, but the time just keeps getting longer. It says connect an Ethernet cable for faster data transfer. I did, but that doesn't seem to help. Any ideas?

    I bought a new iMac today. I'm using migration assistant to move all my software, but the time just keeps getting longer. It says connect an Ethernet cable for faster data transfer. I did, but that doesn't seem to help. Any ideas?

    m1doc,
    Are you migrating from a Mac or a MS Window machine? Either way you probably should be in touch with AppleCare, you have 90 days of free AppleCare telephone support. They can usually help on issues like this. If you don't know the phone number please use http://support.apple.com/kb/HE57 to help find the number in your country.

  • Help with computer setup and PP settings for faster/better previews

    I have been using Cyberlink PowerDirector software for video editing.  It is very easy to use and can do quite a bit.  It was also accelerated by Intel HD graphics built into my system, so I could see a lot of my work at a pretty high resolution in real time.
    However, I wanted to see what PP was capable of, specifically the Warp Stabilizer.
    So I downloaded PP and have been trying to use it, but it was just slow as heck to preview anything (chop stop chop stop...), with render times being insanely long (12 hours for five minutes of footage vs. about 30 minutes with PowerDirector).
    Thinking it was a problem with my system and I needed to get a real graphics card, I got an EVGA GTX 670 (FTW) for $400, and popped it in.  I modified the text file so PP would see it as a compatible card, opened up PP and changed the engine to the new card. 
    Things are faster, but I was expecting a lot more.  Here's what I'm doing:
    1. Shooting Canon 5D mark II (now III) clips 20-60 seconds long, 1080p.
    2. Import to PP and sequence them.
    3. Adding effects:
         A. Top adjustment layer for fast color correction (white balance)
         B. Next adjustment layer: 3-way color, shadow/highlight, unsharp mask, fast blur
         C. Video 1 layer has the clips with warp stabilizer applied to each, and dissolves.
    My final output will be 720p.  ( I shoot 1080p so the Warp Stabilizer will have more to work with, and I can crop without feeling like I'm degrading quality).
    My system: i7 2600k, 16GB RAM, GTX 670 graphics, 120GB SSD "Max IOPS", 2TB 7200rpm internal, 2TB 7200rpm external (USB 2.0, backup drive).
    I can currently preview at 1/4 res in realtime.  I would really like to be able to get to 1/2 res (of course full would be great).  One thing that worries me is that GPU-Z indicates that my GPU is only running at about 2% while previewing, while CPU usage is at around 50%.  I was under the impression that the Mercury thing would use GPU/CUDA to process previews and effects that are supported (that includes Warp Stabilizer).
    I've looked at Sequence Settings and fiddled with Preview File Format and size, but that doesn't seem to do anything.  I'm currently looking around at codecs (Cineform, DNxHD), but don't know if those can help.
    What settings should I alter to get better previews? 

    Well I'm still pretty clueless about this, but for anyone who is looking at this and wondering, here's what I've gleaned:
    1.  After Effects, especially CS6, makes much more and better use of graphics cards than does Premiere Pro.  I'm guessing that PP will, in future versions, make better use of them.  For now, no need to spend more than a couple hundred bucks on one.
    2.  Update the software.  PP and AE both performed substantially better after installing the .01 update from adobe.  After you install the update, be sure to re-do the CUDA hack, if necessary.
    3.  As it stands, money for a PP system is best spent on a processor, as in the newest Intel (currently Ivy Bridge), and overclocked.  This is where performance happens.  I'd say on a 2012 system, 16 GB RAM should be considered a minimum for video editing, and 24 or 32 if you can afford it.  More than that probably won't be utilized.  Hard disks can affect performance, but I don't think it's a bottleneck unless you're doing something that requires VERY fast/large reads and writes (4k source?).  Most people who have high-end editing stations also have a bunch of drives in RAID, but if you look at the performance chart, the SECOND highest scoring tester did not use RAID (though did use a presumably fast and large SSD).
    Keep in mind that all of this has to do with RENDER speeds.  I still don't know what the bottleneck is for PREVIEWS, but I'm just going to assume it's the same.

  • Can i hook a external hard drive to the tc usb port and fire wire from the computer for faster movie transfer ?

    Will i be able to hook a WD 3tb external hard drive via the TC USB port for network storage as well as a direct firewire to the same WD 3TB external hard drive for faster transfer of home movie for storage?

    In general, no.  I do know of any drives that support simultaneous use of the USB and Firewire ports.  (Or eSATA, if equiped.)  I have several USB/FW drives from Seagate, Western Digital, Iomega and others that I used my own hard drive and none allow this.

  • Materialized View with Join for FAST Refresh

    Hi Gurus,
    Facing issues in MV with a simple join for FAST Refresh.
    2 sample Tables:
    1. employee
    empid integer PK
    empname varchar(50)
    deptid integer FK
    2. delta_employee
    empid integer PK
    empname varchar(50)
    deptid integer FK
    dmlflag varchar(2)
    watermark integer
    Code is as given below -
    CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON work.employee
    WITH SEQUENCE,rowid(empid)
    INCLUDING NEW VALUES;
    CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON work.delta_employee
    WITH SEQUENCE,rowid(empid)
    INCLUDING NEW VALUES;
    CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW work.MVEmployee REFRESH force on
    demand with rowid AS
    select e.empid,e.empname,e.deptid,d.empid t1
    from work.employee e, work.delta_employee d
    where e.empid = d.empid;
    Able to perform Complete Refresh. Not able to use Fast Refresh for
    incremental refresh.
    Please help.
    Thanks,
    J Kumar

    Found a solution,
    As per oracle documentation rowid fileds should be included in the Select statement. Even though I included the rowid fields, empid in this case it still didnt work.
    The implementation of the rowid column should be included with tablename.rowid instead of the tablename.columnname !
    Modified script is as given below.
    CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW WORK.MVEMPLOYEE
    REFRESH FORCE ON DEMAND
    WITH PRIMARY KEY
    AS
    select e.rowid "empid",d.rowid "t1" ,e.empname,e.deptid
    from work.employee e, work.delta_employee d
    where e.empid = d.empid;
    And It really WORKS

  • Does iWeb automatically compress photos for faster loading? Or should I do it first? Thx

    Hi everyone, when I look at the large photo in the "white" theme's Welcome template, I wonder when I drag and drop one of my photos in, does iWeb compress the photo for faster loading? Or should I compress them before adding to site?
    By "compress" I mean, make photo file size smaller! :)
    Thx! :)

    In iWeb Preferences you can optimze images on import. But I always scale most of my images to 800 x 600 pixels prior to importing. I do this in Graphic Coverter which also makes the image files smaller by taking unneeded information out of the file, which also reduces the file size.
    In Graphic Converter

  • When I try to charge the phone it says for faster charge use original cable

    Just got my Note 3 late yesterday afternoon. When I try to charge the phone it says for faster charge use original cable and that is what I am doing. Even tried a different charger and it says the same thing so I have not been able to use my phone at all. Please help. I am going back to the store today when they open. Help!!!

        I want to help make it as easy possible to charge your device myluv2drive! Is this happening with the original charging cable itself or is this an alternate charger? Have you tried a battery pull since this started? Did this happen the first time you tried charging it? Any different response when trying alternate outlets?
    JonathanK_VZW
    VZW Support
    Follow Us on Twitter@VZWSupport

Maybe you are looking for