Rule below overprints descender

We've been using the rule-below in some paragraph styles that use green type. The rule is tight to the baseline, so the descenders extend past it. On our old template, the green covers the black rule. But we've recently made a copy of that template and now the black rule is visible across the green descender.
It does not display this way. On screen it appears that the green is covering the rule. But on output, the black is visible across the green. We're using the same printers and presets as before. The new template is a copy of the old, but many modifications have been made.
The rule below is applied by a paragraph style. The new style is a copy of the old but at a slightly smaller type size. The rule-below size has not been changed.
The green type is applied by a character style using a swatch.
I am completely baffled.

It sounds like the green text is set to overprint (the black overprint won't matter because it is behind the type). You have to turn on Overprint Preview to see the print effects of overprinting. So here you can see my window shows I have [Overprint Preview] on, with the top green line set to OP and the bottom line set to knockout:

Similar Messages

Putting a gap in a rule below

Hello,
Whenever I design a form that requires rules below (e.g. Name______________ Address______________), I frequently have a need to have a gap in the rule below. For example, I might have State_________ Zip____________ on one line, but I seem to be forced to insert a little table here in order to get that gap. There must be an easier way! If you know how to create a gap in the rule, which then starts up again a little later on the same line, I would be most grateful if you could share!
Thanks,
Trina

Trina,
My trick totally depends on the order InDesign draws its stuff. You cannot influence this. But I just tried it, and (of course) I was right after all:
Trina Larson wrote:
Your method sounds intriguing in certain situations, with the exception being that the tabs will be changing depending on the length of the text, which would mean constantly overriding the Paragraph Style to fix the tabs.
Well yeah, but (1) you need to do that anyway.
(2) You only need to set tab stops where each next item should start -- to get a bit of white space 'before' and 'after' text, just type in a space or en-space.
(3) You don't need to add a tab at the very end to have the rule run to the right margin. Paragraph rules run all the way by default.
(4) (uh, what was it?) Oh yeah: since this all can be set up in the Paragraph Style and Character Style, you only have to change these for a global change. For example, you might decide you want a thinner line; or you want it to move up or down a bit.
Re (1): I don't think there is a good way to do something like this without custom tab settings. (You could manually insert underscores or underlined spaces. But that's not a "good" way.)

How can I create paragraph rules below a heading in InDesign CS5?

I have created a rule but the headings are appearing sometimes with a rule both above and below and sometimes only below...the display is inconsistent.
I'd be very happy if someone could tell me what I'm doing wrong here.
Here is a screenshot - note the red "Course type headings". If it's too small to see please visit this link https://dl.dropbox.com/u/17454370/paragraph_style_problem.png
Thank you, SG

THANK YOU!!!
I now have it displaying both above and below, but cannot get it to just show below. I have tried unchecking 'rule on' for rule above, but nothing changes.
SG
update: I get it; I need to play with inserting and deleting new paragraphs!
Thanks so much, Bob.
Message was edited by: sally_g

HFM Equity Accounting Rules - Time dependant

Has anyone needed to amend HFM Rules for Equity Accounting, we are in the process of doing so, we a new app in which we will be Equity Accounting from Proportional. Elim Rule for JV's are time dependant to run after 2014. However after we have included the Sub Eliminate section for the new rule it does not run after 2014. I attach the section of the rule below: Any help would be grateful.
Sub EliminateNew_EQ(sAccount, sICP, sCustom3)
If POV_YEAR > "2014" Then
' Rules have been chanegd for Equity Accounting from 2014 onwards - plug accounts no longer populated and JV accounts now holding 100% of balances.
sParent = HS.Parent.Member()
sPlugAcct = HS.Account.PlugAcct(sAccount)
IsEliminated = False
'Checks if eliminations should be performed
'If ICP member is not [ICP None]
If (StrComp(sICP, "[ICP None]", vbTextCompare) <> 0) Then
'If account is an ICP account
If HS.Account.IsICP(sAccount) Then
   'If the account has a plug account
   If sPlugAcct <> "" Then
    'If the ICP partner is a descendant of the current parent (we've reached the first common parent)
    If HS.Parent.IsDescendant(sParent, sICP) Then
     IsEliminated = True
    End If
   End If
End If
End If
'Performs eliminations if required
If IsEliminated Then
PConEntity = HS.Node.PCon("")
' Rules have been chanegd for Equity Accounting from 2014 onwards - plug accounts no longer populated and JV accounts now holding 100% of balances.
'If one of these accounts
Select Case sAccount
Case "310401", "416701", "323301", "130101", "237011", "237021", "237001", "237043", "237045", "C100241", "C100225", "C100227"
         'Eliminate input account balance on C3#Input, C3#JV or C3#Sub members
   Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination]", PConEntity * -1, "")
   'If entity is a sub and ICP is JV
   If sCustom3 = "Sub" And Trim(HS.Entity.UD1(sICP)) = "JV" Then
    sParentICP = GetICPParent(sParent,sICP)
    PConICP = HS.Node.PCon("E#" & sParentICP & "." & sICP)
    If sAccount = "310401" Then
     'Post 1-PConICP normally(50%) to JV account and ConICP (normally 50%) to inter company plug account
     Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#301102_JV.C3#Input",1, "")
     'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
    ElseIf sAccount = "416701" Then
     Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#416002_JV.C3#Input",1,"")
     'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
    ElseIf sAccount = "323301" Then
     Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#323002_JV.C3#Input",1,"")
     'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
    'See subroutine description for details
    ElseIf sAccount = "130101" Then
     dData = HS.GetCell("A#130101.I#" & sICP & C1C2C3C4Top)
     If dData < 0 Then
      Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#200202_JV.C1#Less1.C3#Input",1, "")
     Else
      Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#119002_JV.C1#Less1.C3#Input",1, "")
     End If
     'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
    ElseIf sAccount = "237011" Or sAccount = "237021" Then
     Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#236005_JV.C3#Input",1, "")
     'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
    ElseIf sAccount = "237001" Then
     Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#237001_JV.C3#Input",1, "")
     'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
    ElseIf sAccount = "237043" Then
     Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#237044_JV.C3#Input",1, "")
     'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
    ElseIf sAccount = "237045" Then
     Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#237046_JV.C3#Input",1, "")
     'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
    ElseIf sAccount = "C100241" Then
     Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#C100302_JV.C3#Input",1, "")
     'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
    ElseIf sAccount = "C100225" Then
     Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#C100225_JV.C3#Input",1, "")
     'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
    ElseIf sAccount = "C100227" Then
     Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#C100227_JV.C3#Input",1, "")
     'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
'Commented out because code never runs DC 17/06/10
'    ElseIf sAccount = "C100311" Then
'     Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#C100315_JV.C3#Input", 1 - PConICP, "")
'     Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
    End If
   'If entity is a sub and ICP is a sub or entity is a JV
   ElseIf sCustom3 = "Sub" And Trim(HS.Entity.UD1(sICP)) <> "JV" _
   Or sCustom3 = "JV" Then
    'Post 100% of source value to IC plug account
    Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConEntity, "")
   End If
'Case other ICP accounts
Case Else
'Call WriteToFile("Posting to source account")
   Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination]", PConEntity * -1, "")
   Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct, PConEntity, "")
End Select
End If

This has now been resolved after we put the Time dependancy with the Call Routines

Cisco ASA 5505 Rule

I have an ASA 5505 router. I have configured most of the rules, but have had assistance from online forums and outside consultants
configuring some rules. There is one in my configuration that I do not understand, and I do not remember entering it myself. The rule is blocking traffic
when a server on the private side tries to send http traffic to itself. Not sure what the purpose of the rule is or why it is there.
When I click on rule 35, it highlights both 35 and 36.
#   Type       Source destination service interface address service DNS Rewrite Max TCP   Ebbronic Limit Max UDP... Randomize Seq #
35 Dynamic any     <blank>     <blank> inside      inside   <blank> <blank>     Unlimited Unlimited     Unlimited <checked>
36 <blank> <blank> <blank>   <blank> outside    outside <blank> <blank>     Unlimited Unlimited     Unlimited
I am hesitant to delete the rule until I know the purpose.
I am not sure but the rule below may be what is generatig it (I am not familiar withg command line commands):
access-group outside_access_in in interface outside
route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 209.34.249.193 1
Can someone tell me whay this is for, or what it is doing?

I used Packet Tracer (a GUI tool) to determine which NAT rule was blocking the traffic I am trying to allow. It was rule 35 & 36 as shown in my original post. I attempted to correlate the gui rule to the cli. I don't know if i picked the correct cli rule or not. That is why I showed both of them.
Since rule 35 is dynamic, I tried:
Result of the command: "show run dynamic"
crypto dynamic-map outside_dyn_map 20 set pfs group1
crypto dynamic-map outside_dyn_map 20 set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA
This rule is part of the VPN setup I think, which would make sense because I had a consultant set it up for me.
Result of the command: "show run global"
global (inside) 1 interface
global (outside) 1 interface
global (outside) 199 xxx.xxx.249.200
nat (inside) 0 access-list inside_nat0_outbound
nat (inside) 199 access-list Mail
nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
Result of the command: "show run static"
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.13 ftp 192.168.1.20 ftp netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.249.200 smtp 192.168.1.119 smtp netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.249.196 www 192.168.1.100 www netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.249.197 www 192.168.1.101 www netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.249.198 www 192.168.1.102 www netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.249.199 www 192.168.1.103 www netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.1 https 192.168.1.109 https netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.2 https 192.168.1.110 https netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.3 https 192.168.1.111 https netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.4 https 192.168.1.112 https netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.5 https 192.168.1.113 https netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.6 https 192.168.1.114 https netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.7 https 192.168.1.115 https netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.8 https 192.168.1.116 https netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.9 https 192.168.1.117 https netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.10 https 192.168.1.118 https netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.11 https 192.168.1.119 https netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.12 https 192.168.1.120 https netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.13 https 192.168.1.121 https netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.13 www 192.168.1.121 www netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.14 ftp 192.168.1.122 ftp netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.14 ftp-data 192.168.1.122 ftp-data netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,inside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.6 1443 192.168.1.40 1443 netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.5 1443 192.168.1.40 1443 netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.249.197 1080 access-list Nat1
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.249.198 1080 access-list Nat2
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.249.198 2080 access-list Nat4
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.249.197 2080 access-list Nat3
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.249.199 1080 access-list Nat5
static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.249.199 2080 access-list Nat6
static (outside,inside) 192.168.1.50 xxx.xxx.249.200 netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,inside) xxx.xxx.249.197 192.168.1.50 netmask 255.255.255.255
nat (inside) 0 access-list inside_nat0_outbound
nat (inside) 199 access-list Mail
nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
I included other cli but changes the ip addresses.
I am trying to allow my server behind the firewall to send http traffic to itself. Currently blocked by rule 35&36 in the gui.

Unbounded element in Business Rules

Hi everyone,
I am trying to achieve in returning the same element (unbounded) when the rules condition are satisfied. I want to return the below response message:
<newJoinerRulesResponse>
<Rule>
<Code>Example</Code>
<Description>test</Description>
</Rule>
<Rule>
<Code>Example2</Code>
<Description>test2</Description>
</Rule>
</newJoinerRulesResponse>
As you can see the rule engine need to return more then one element Rule. How can I achieve this? I my example I am using two rules:
1.When the salary is > 50000 then create element rule, with code = Example and Description = test
2. When the age of a person is not between 16 and 65 then create an extra element rule with code = example2 and Description = test2
The Rule element in my xsd schema is unbounded. This will create an fact RuleType from type list. The problem with the type list that I cant create a new RuleType, while this is possible without the unbounded element. However then I can only create one Rule element in the response (and not two what I really want!). I think the way forward is a function. The function I created named AddRulesElement consist of the below code:
- I have created three parameters: arg_code that retrieved the value used for element Code, one for the element Description (arg_description) and one parameter based on type ResultRulesType (arg_resulttype). This is the complextype containing the element Rule.
The code in the body is:
assign new RuleType ResultRule = new RuleType()
assign ResultRule.code = arg_code
assign ResultRule.description = arg_description
call arg_resulttype.rule.add (ResultRule.code.length(), ResultRule)
From the two rule set I then call the function as follow:
IF NewJoinerRulesType.salary > 50000
THEN
**call AddRulesElement (arg_code: "Example", arg_description: "Test", arg_resultype: ResultRulesTypes)**
IF NewJoinerRulesType.age < 16 or NewJoinerRulesType.age > 65
THEN
**call AddRulesElement (arg_code: "Example2", arg_description: "Test2", arg_resultype: ResultRulesTypes)**
This keep given me the below error:
RUL-05164: The fact type "ResultRulesType" is referenced, but is not asserted nor input.
Please help how I can achieve a response of two elements Rule!! I have included the xsd schema I use for the rules below.
Many Thanks
Ren
P.s. please note my responses will be slow as I am away till next week Tuesday.
My xsd schema is of the following structure:
<?xml version= '1.0' encoding= 'UTF-8' ?>
<xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:vnj="http://www.example/soa/initiative/definition/validateNewJoinerService/xsd/TestUnboundedRules_v1_0"
targetNamespace="http://www.example/soa/initiative/definition/validateNewJoinerService/xsd/TestUnboundedRules_v1_0"
elementFormDefault="qualified">
<xsd:element name="newJoinerRulesRequest" type="vnj:newJoinerRulesType">
<xsd:annotation>
<xsd:documentation>A sample element</xsd:documentation>
</xsd:annotation>
</xsd:element>
<xsd:element name="newJoinerRulesResponse" type="vnj:ResultRulesType">
<xsd:annotation>
<xsd:documentation>A sample element</xsd:documentation>
</xsd:annotation>
</xsd:element>
<xsd:complexType name="newJoinerRulesType">
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="Birthday" type="xsd:date"/>
<xsd:element name="Salary" type="xsd:integer"/>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
<xsd:complexType name="ResultRulesType">
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="Rule" type="vnj:RuleType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
<xsd:complexType name="RuleType">
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="RuleSequence" type="xsd:integer" minOccurs="0"/>
<xsd:element name="Code" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
<xsd:element name="Description" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:schema>

He everyone,
I found out that I first need to insert an empty ResultType in the rule before I can call the function. This now works but at run-time I am now receiving the below error:
Fact not found in the rule engine working memory, rule session execution failed. The rule session 70005 failed because an instance of the fact emample.soa.initiative.definition.validatenewjoinerservice.xsd.newjoinerrules_v1_0.ResultRulesType could not be found in the working memory of the rule session. This is most likely a rule modeling error. The decision service interaction expects the fact instance to exist in the working memory of the rule session. Check the rule actions in rule designer and make sure that a fact of the expected type is being asserted. If the error persists, contact Oracle Support Services. 70005
I hope somebody can help!!
Many Thanks
Ren

I'm trying to remove paragraph rules from paragraphs in an InDesign document, but cannot because it (incorrectly) says they're already turned off

So, basically what a title says. I'm working on a document for my employer in which some of the formatting is already in place. As part of that formatting, InDesign is adding horizontal rules after every paragraph, and there are some paragraphs for which this would not be appropriate, particularly bulleted lists, so I'm attempting to remove them. Problem is, when I select the paragraphs and pull up the Paragraph Rules dialog, it claims that the horizontal rules area already turned off, and that I therefore cannot remove them. Does anyone know what's going on or how to fix it?

Hi,
Have you checked that the paragraph rule is not "Rule Below"? Rule above is switched off, but Rule below may well be on. Select it in the popup shown in your screenshot.
Regards,
Malcolm

How to apply an InDesign Paragraph Rule above, but not when first in column

How do I apply a paragraph rule "above" but not when first in a column. In other words, the rule above will only run if it isn't the first paragraph in the column (even if it appears in a multi-column text frame).
Before you jump the gun: Rule below will not solve that, for various reasons.
Thanks much in advance.

Aha! Apparently totally!
Here a similar way to yours with an anchored block. Copy it and launch this simple regex. Easy with no headache!

Can I change the default settings for Paragraph Rules?

Hello
I need to apply the same 'Rule Below' to a lot of separate lines of text in InDesign CS5, but the settings I want differ from the default ones in the Paragraph Rules dialogue box. Is there a way to change the default settings so I can just click Rule On rather than inputting the same information a million and one times?
Many thanks

You will need a separate paragraph style for each heading level
Heading Level 1
Heading Level 2
Heading Level 3
For Heading Level 1 - create a Paragraph Style and set it the way you want.
For Heading Level 2 - make sure that in General that "Based on: Heading Level 1", this will give it same properties as H1 - but you can change the size of the text and the size paragraph rule to suit.
For HEading Level 3 - make sure that you set it to Based On: Heading Level 1 (this is vital)
And do the same for all Sub Heading levels.
I'd usually assign shortcuts of
CTRL ALT SHIFT 1 - for H1
CTRL ALT SHIFT 2 - for H2
Etc.
This will ensure consistency across your document.
Say for example you needed to change the colour or tint of all Paragraph Rules
CHANGE H1 ONLY - and this will also be applied to H2 H3 H4 etc. As long as you haven't given different tints/colours to each individual Paragraph Rule in the Styles.

Vertical rules in paragraph style?

Hi,
I'm about to design a book with a lot of interviews. To make it a bit easier for the reader to follow I've designed a thin colored line to the left of the paragraph indicating who's saying what (see pic). The problem is that I can't seem to make these lines with the paragraph style which will be a problem further down the line if I do it manual with the line-tool. So my question is; Dose anyone have a solution that will make the lines flow dynamically together with the text?

Make a Paragraph Rule Above
Basically - on the paragraph go to Paragraph Rules in the Paragraph Style
Then Apply a negative right or left indent and set the point size to equal the leading of the paragraph, so if you have 5 lines and the leading is 14pt, then the pt size for the thickness of the rule should be 70
For 8/14pt with 8 lines of text
So Rule Below (tick box)
Color: (pick a color)
Weight 113pt (14 x 8 = 113)
Width = Column
Offset = 108 pts
Left indent = -8.5 pts
Right indent = 173pts
(adjust left and right indents to vary thickness)
It's not perfect as if the text increases or decreases you have to adjust the size of the line.
You could always anchor an object to the text, and offset (http://help.adobe.com/en_US/InDesign/6.0/WSa285fff53dea4f8617383751001ea8cb3f-6c43a.html )

Udev/hal rules won't automount my ipod

After following directions in the wiki articles on hal and udev to get my ipod to automount and generate the /dev/ipod device, I'm at a loss because nothing seems to work as explained. (I'm running Arch64 with LXDE)
I've added the following rule to /etc/hal/fdi/policy/ipod.fdi:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<device>
<match key="@block.storage_device:storage.model" string="iPod">
<merge key="volume.policy.desired_mount_point" type="string">ipod</merge>
<merge key="volume.policy.mount_option.iocharset=iso8859-15" type="bool">true</merge>
<merge key="volume.policy.mount_option.sync" type="bool">true</merge>
</match>
</device>
I've added the following rule to /etc/udev/rules.d/60-ipod.rules
BUS=="usb", ATTRS{manufacturer}=="Apple*", ATTRS{model}=="iPod*", KERNEL=="sd?2", SYMLINK+="ipod", NAME="%k", GROUP="storage"
When I plug in the ipod, Pcmanfm will show 'Apple Ipod Music Player' in the left column with the other drives. When I click on it, it will properly mount the ipod to /media/{name of ipod}. I would like it to mount every ipod at /media/ipod, and create a link /dev/ipod. I haven't put anything in the fstab yet, but in any case, the /dev/ipod link is not created. I know the udev rules work, because it will create the correct link for /dev/pilot when I plug in my Palm.
Help! I'm trying hard to wrap my brain around this, and I don't understand why it's not creating the /dev/ipod link. I've restarted the computer and restarted hal and reloaded udev rules multiple times with no changes.
Thanks!
Scott

Ahhh....thank you! If I take out the 'last_rule' option it does indeed show up on pcmanfm. However, I think it's happening somewhere outside the parsing of the udev rules (perhaps HAL???) because even if I moved the local rules to the very last (99-local.rules) but kept in the 'last_rule' option, it would still not show up.
Now, second problem is trying to distinguish between flash drive and ipod. I thought you could use a != on an attribute. The rules below still result in /dev/sdb2 on the ipod getting mounted twice .... once to /media/ipod and once to /media/usbhd-sdb2.
## Automount usb drives
#Prevent sd?1 of the ipod from being mounted
KERNEL=="sd?1", ATTRS{manufacturer}=="Apple*", ATTRS{product}=="iPod*", OPTIONS="last_rule"
KERNEL=="sd?2", ATTRS{manufacturer}=="Apple*", ATTRS{product}=="iPod*", SYMLINK+="ipod", NAME="%k", GROUP="storage"
ACTION=="add", KERNEL=="sd?2", ATTRS{manufacturer}=="Apple*", ATTRS{product}=="iPod*", RUN+="/bin/mount -t vfat -o rw,noauto,shortname=mixed,flush,dirsync,quiet,noatime,nodiratime,uid=1000,utf8,umask=077,nodev,nosuid /dev/ipod /media/ipod"
#Automount flash drives to /media/usbdh-sd??
ACTION=="add", ATTRS{product}!="iPod*", KERNEL=="sd[b-z][0-9]", RUN+="/bin/mkdir -p /media/usbhd-%k"
KERNEL=="sd[b-z]", ATTRS{product}!="iPod*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK+="usbhd-%k", GROUP="storage"
ACTION=="add", KERNEL=="sd[b-z][0-9]", ATTRS{product}!="iPod*", SYMLINK+="usbhd-%k", GROUP="storage", NAME="%k"
ACTION=="add", KERNEL=="sd[b-z][0-9]", ATTRS{product}!="iPod*", RUN+="/bin/mkdir -p /media/usbhd-%k"
ACTION=="add", KERNEL=="sd[b-z][0-9]", ATTRS{product}!="iPod*", RUN+="/bin/ln -s /media/usbhd-%k /mnt/usbhd-%k"
ACTION=="add", KERNEL=="sd[b-z][0-9]", ATTRS{product}!="iPod*", PROGRAM=="/lib/udev/vol_id -t %N", RESULT=="vfat", RUN+="/bin/mount -t vfat -o rw,noauto,flush,dirsync,quiet,nodev,nosuid,noatime,nodiratime,dmask=000,fmask=111 /dev/%k /media/usbhd-%k"
ACTION=="add", KERNEL=="sd[b-z][0-9]", ATTRS{product}!="iPod*", RUN+="/bin/mount -t auto -o rw,noauto,async,dirsync,nodev,noatime /dev/%k /media/usbhd-%k"
#Unmount everything on removal
ACTION=="remove", KERNEL=="sd[a-z][0-9]", RUN+="/bin/rm -f /mnt/usbhd-%k"
ACTION=="remove", KERNEL=="sd[a-z][0-9]", RUN+="/bin/umount -l /dev/%k"
ACTION=="remove", KERNEL=="sd[a-z][0-9]", RUN+="/bin/rmdir /media/usbhd-%k"
Any ideas?
Thanks, Scott

Rules behind text. How do I get rid of them?

HELP! - I have rules that are behind some type within the text box. CS4. Can't figure out how to remove it. It's a client supplied fileI so I don't truely know how it was build. I like to think I'm not totally stupid, but I feel pretty dumb. Please help.

Okay I figured it out, it was something to do with the rules below, but when I went into the pallet it was unchecked. I assumed it wasn't it. I tried turning it on and off and it seemed to get rid of it.
Thanks all.

Populating dropdown with Map rule

Hey,
I am currently getting a list of users that belong to an admin role and looking up the individual fullnames to create a map to display the name in the dropdown but pass the accountId once the form is submitted. My rule is below however the result of my rule currently gives me this:
<List>
<Map>
<MapEntry key='id1' value=name1'/>
</Map>
<Map>
<MapEntry key='id2' value='name2'/>
</Map>
</List>
I really just want something like this so i can put it in the valueMap property in a dropdown:
<Map>
<MapEntry key='id1' value='name1'/>
<MapEntry key='id2' value='name2'/>
</Map>
Any ideas how i need to change my rule below:
<block>
<defvar name='idList'>
<invoke name='getUsers' class='com.waveset.ui.FormUtil'>
<ref>:display.session</ref>
<map>
<s>conditions</s>
<map>
<s>adminRoles</s>
<s>Role</s>
</map>
</map>
</invoke>
</defvar>
<dolist name='entry'>
<ref>idList</ref>
<map>
<ref>entry</ref>
<invoke name='getAttribute'>
<invoke name='getObject'>
<ref>:display.session</ref>
<s>User</s>
<ref>entry</ref>
</invoke>
<s>fullname</s>
</invoke>
</map>
</dolist>
</block>

Try:
<block>
<defvar name='idList'>
<invoke name='getUsers' class='com.waveset.ui.FormUtil'>
<ref>:display.session</ref>
<map>
<s>conditions</s>
<map>
<s>adminRoles</s>
<s>Role</s>
</map>
</map>
</invoke>
</defvar>
<defvar name='retMap'>
<new class='java.util.HashMap'/>
</defvar>
<dolist name='entry'>
<ref>idList</ref>
<set>
<ref>retMap</ref>
<ref>entry</ref>
<invoke name='getAttribute'>
<invoke name='getObject'>
<ref>:display.session</ref>
<s>User</s>
<ref>entry</ref>
</invoke>
<s>fullname</s>
</invoke>
</set>
</dolist>
<ref>retMap</ref>
</block>

DLINK 2750B - Entering Custom Firewall Rules

I am having difficulty entering these rules below. I seem to be able to add the "allow" but dont see how to add the blocking. How does one block a a port to an IP or IP range? ALLOW TCP/UDP IN/OUT to 208.67.222.222 or 208.67.220.220 on Port 53 and below it BLOCK TCP/UDP IN/OUT all IP addresses on Port 53 Forcing DNS so it can not be circumvented to OpenDNS parent filter, I dont care if its not supported, I just need to know if it can be done. Any ASSISTANCE, specifically with this firewall setting on this device, in performing this task with this modem is greatly appreciated, color commentary is not. Thank you very much!

In this case, you will want to make sure the DNS Rule for allowing the DNS traffic is allowed with priority over the deny policy. Make your allow policy by specifying TCP and UDP as allowed, Port 53, to both of OpenDNS's servers. Two identical rules, less the IPs will need to be created in many cases.
In most cases, you can usually set an "All IPs" range by leaving the IP address set to 0.0.0.0 with Port 53 and TCP/UDP set. Note that because DNS can work over either TCP or UDP depending on the server, you must filter both protocols. It is best to use "REJECT" in order to kill off DNS requests, as "DROP" will cause latency.
I do not know how the D-Link will treat creating rules in this fashion, let us know what your results are. If your question involves where the Deny/Reject/Drop options are for the firewall rules, then please provide a screenshot of what you see to help us out.
========
The first to bring me 1Gbps Fiber for $30/m wins!

Consolidation of Descendant Selectors Using JavaScript

QUESTION: How does one use Javascript to apply a CSS rule to a descendant set of selectors?
BACKGROUND
With each <li> tag (shown) there is associated a unique <body> tag (not shown). Further, each <li> tag is grouped together with other <li> tags under the same <div> tag (shown). All tags involved in this rule are uniquely identified with an id attribute. Obvious, perhaps, there will be a unique webpage for each <li> tag.
By way of example, if I were writing the rule for the tag <li id="setting"> of a single page, I would write it as follows:
body#bodysetting div#probablepast li#setting {
background-color:#AAA;
color:#000;
Note that the id of the <body> tag in the above example was obtained by prepending the word body before the id of the <li> tag.
OBJECTIVE: With there being so many <li> tags, I am thinking that I should write a JavaScript that would repeat the above pattern for each and every tag.
PROPOSAL: For the moment, I am considering placing the <div> tag identifiers in one array, the <li> tag identifiers in another array, and then creating still another array for the <body> tag identifiers by prepending the word body to each element of the <li> tag array. A set of loop statements would then concatenate the tags and identifiers for each <li> tag into a single set of descendant selectors such as I have provided above and generate the same CSS rule for each new page when it opens.
DISCLAIMER: I realize that it would be sufficient to simply use the id of each <li> tag, but I would like to preserve the above structure for the sake of logical coherence and in anticipation of other behaviors that I have yet to develop.
THE SELECTORS
div#probablepast
li#setting
li#resistance
li#ideology
li#containment
li#reforms
li#deception
div#popularpresent1
li#peaceful
li#industrious
li#studious
li#polite
li#difficult
li#closed
li#traditional
li#unique
div#popularpresent2
li#authoritarian
li#mercantilist
li#hightrust
li#collective
li#ricevillage
li#neurotic
li#racialpurity
div#bridgingthegap
li#gap
li#identity
li#shadows
li#dilemma
li#moreunique
div#contemporaryjapan
li#auntmadoka
li#chishiki
li#instruction
li#worldwithin
li#pyrimidal
li#gaijinsama
div#overcomingthebarriers
li#culture
li#genes
li#nationalidentity
li#bordercrossing
li#language

Murray *ACE* wrote: I am confused as to why you would want to style each list element uniquely. It obviously is something of great importance (although I cannot think of an instance where I would want to do such a thing).
With a little help you probably can:
body#bodysetting li#setting {style definition}
and
li#setting {style definition}
are not the same when the page is constantly changing as it does with "persistent page indicators".
Murray *ACE* wrote: In that case, using javascript to accomplish something of great importance is a risky thing to do....
Yes and no. My Google stats tell me that 97% of my viewers are using Javascript when they view my pages. This is an extraordinarily high proportion that is well worth targeting. I can dream about the luxury of 100% accessibility after I begin receiving my expected book royalties.
For some, being generous is a way of life. For others, it is a way of making a name for themselves while engaging in legalized tax evasion. For me, it is a feeling that ebbs and flows according to the behavior of those who stand to benefit from my generosity.
Thank you for your continued interest.
Roddy

Rule below overprints descender

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for