RV120W 1.0.2.6 Port VLAN
I recently upgraded from 1.0.1.3 to 1.0.2.6. I tried to change on of my port VLANs and couldn't find the port vlan configuration anymore. After a lot of searching, I reloaded 1.0.1.3, reconfigured the port vlans and then reloaded 1.0.2.6. All is fine now.
I reread all the notes, and I can't find anything on changes to port vlan. Am I missing it in the configuration areas, or was it eliminated?
Hi Richard,
No VLANing functionality and mapping wireless to a VLAN is sort integral to the unit.
It's got to be there.
I know the newest version of code was also designed to improve the usability of the GUI, so i guess thaings may have changed around a bit.
The Admin guide referenced below, does suggest on page 30;
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/csbr/rv120w/administration/guide/rv120w_admin.pdf
So it looks like the GUI may have gone from port vlan to vlan membership, but I have loaned out my RV120W to a Cisco partner and cannot personally confirm this.
Enabling VLANs
STEP 1 Choose Networking > LAN (Local Network) > VLAN Membership.
STEP 2 Check the Enable box.
STEP 3 Click Save
Creating a VLAN
You can create up to four VLANs on the Cisco RV120W.
STEP 1 Choose Networking > LAN (Local Network) > VLAN Membership.
STEP 2 In the VLAN Membership Table, click Add Row.
STEP 3 Enter a numerical VLAN ID that will be assigned to endpoints in the VLAN
membership.
The VLAN ID can range from 2 to 4094. VLAN ID 1 is reserved for the
default VLAN, which is used for untagged frames received on the interface, and
VLAN ID 4092 is reserved and cannot be used.
Hope this helps
regards Dave
Similar Messages
-
Hi,
I'm following this
guide I'm getting an error when running the below command:
Set-VMNetworkAdapterVlan -vmname PurpleVM1 -Isolated -PrimaryVlanId 2 –SecondaryVlanId 4
Generates the following error:
Set-VMNetworkAdapterVlan : The operation failed.
Failed while applying switch port settings 'Ethernet Switch Port VLAN Settings' on switch 'New Virtual Switch': One or
more arguments are invalid (0x80070057).
A parameter that is not valid was passed to the operation.
Does anyone know why this is happening?
taHi TomG101,
It seems that there is a configuration conflict on the virtual switch port .
Also I tested the command on my lab , it works .
For troubleshooting please create a new virtual switch then try to configure again .
Any further information please feel free to let us know .
Best Regards
Elton Ji
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place. -
UC520 SNMP change fast ethernet switch port vlan
Hi,
I've a UC520 running with uc500-advipservicesk9-mz.151-4.M5. I try to change VLAN on the switchport using snmp however look like the UC520 doesn't support "vmVlan".
snmpwalk -v 1 -c private 10.1.1.1 ifDescr
IF-MIB::ifDescr.4 = STRING: FastEthernet0/1/1
snmpset -v 1 -c private 10.1.1.1 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.68.1.2.2.1.2.4 integer 151
Error in packet.
Reason: (noSuchName) There is no such variable name in this MIB.
Failed object: SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.68.1.2.2.1.2.4
Does anyone know what is the MIB for change switch port vlan ?
Rg,
Gerald.What do you mean by dumb siwthc? What model/make/company is that switch?
Can you try to do the reset of the switch so that it wipe off all the config what so ever present on the box and then try to connect the switch to the router? -
GE cards supported for port- vlan based EoMPLS on 7600/sup720
Hi,
Can anyone explain/point where I can find de proper documentation where I can find the support for port- vlan based EoMPLS support cards on a 7600 with a sup720 engine on the CCO site ?
WHich GE port cards are supporting EoMPLS and which GE cards will support it not.try
www.cisco.com/go/fn
-Waris -
Dear all,
I'm currently in the process of configuring two Nexus 5672 Switches for our Network. I connected one of the switches to our catalyst 3750 Core using trunks on each side. Everything worked just fine - the link came up and I was able to manage the Nexus using the SVI I created in VLAN1.
However, after upgrading the Nexus 5672 from NX-OS 7.0(2)N1(1) to 7.1(0)N1(1), the connection between the Nexus and the Catalyst 3750 is broken - the corresponding port on the Nexus (eth 1/1) is blocked by STP due to a Port VLAN ID mismatch and it chooses itself to be the root bridge:
sw-5672-01# show spanning-tree
VLAN0001
Spanning tree enabled protocol rstp
Root ID Priority 32769
Address 8c60.4f1b.9181
This bridge is the root
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Bridge ID Priority 32769 (priority 32768 sys-id-ext 1)
Address 8c60.4f1b.9181
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Interface Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type
Eth1/1 Desg BKN*4 128.129 P2p Peer(STP) *PVID_Inc
Eth2/1 Desg FWD 1 128.257 P2p
sw-5672-01# show spanning-tree detail
Port 129 (Ethernet1/1) of VLAN0001 is broken (Port VLAN ID Mismatch)
Port path cost 4, Port priority 128, Port Identifier 128.129
Designated root has priority 24577, address 000d.bce9.2b00
Designated bridge has priority 32769, address 8c60.4f1b.9181
Designated port id is 128.129, designated path cost 4
Timers: message age 0, forward delay 14, hold 0
Number of transitions to forwarding state: 1
Link type is point-to-point by default, Peer is STP
BPDU: sent 164, received 309
However, the trunks on both switches are configured with the same values and I don't see any problem here:
Trunk Port on the nexus switch:
sw-5672-01# show interface ethernet 1/1 switchport
Name: Ethernet1/1
Switchport: Enabled
Switchport Monitor: Not enabled
Operational Mode: trunk
Access Mode VLAN: 1 (default)
Trunking Native Mode VLAN: 1 (default)
Trunking VLANs Allowed: 1-4094
Voice VLAN: none
Extended Trust State : not trusted [COS = 0]
Administrative private-vlan primary host-association: none
Administrative private-vlan secondary host-association: none
Administrative private-vlan primary mapping: none
Administrative private-vlan secondary mapping: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk native VLAN: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk encapsulation: dot1q
Administrative private-vlan trunk normal VLANs: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk private VLANs: none
Operational private-vlan: none
Unknown unicast blocked: disabled
Unknown multicast blocked: disabled
Trunk port on the 3750 switch:
sw-3750-01# show interfaces gigabitEthernet 3/0/1 switchport
Name: Gi3/0/1
Switchport: Enabled
Administrative Mode: trunk
Operational Mode: trunk
Administrative Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q
Operational Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q
Negotiation of Trunking: On
Access Mode VLAN: 1 (default)
Trunking Native Mode VLAN: 1 (default)
Administrative Native VLAN tagging: enabled
Voice VLAN: none
Administrative private-vlan host-association: none
Administrative private-vlan mapping: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk native VLAN: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk Native VLAN tagging: enabled
Administrative private-vlan trunk encapsulation: dot1q
Administrative private-vlan trunk normal VLANs: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk associations: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk mappings: none
Operational private-vlan: none
Trunking VLANs Enabled: ALL
Pruning VLANs Enabled: 2-1001
Capture Mode Disabled
Capture VLANs Allowed: ALL
Protected: false
Unknown unicast blocked: disabled
Unknown multicast blocked: disabled
Appliance trust: none
When downgrading the Nexus 5672 back to NX-OS 7.0(2)N1(1) the connection is fine again, interface eth 1/1 on the Nexus switch is not blocked anymore and chooses the correct root bridge (which is the 3750):
sw-5672-01# show spanning-tree
VLAN0001
Spanning tree enabled protocol rstp
Root ID Priority 24577
Address 000d.bce9.2b00
Cost 4
Port 129 (Ethernet1/1)
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Bridge ID Priority 32769 (priority 32768 sys-id-ext 1)
Address 8c60.4f1b.9181
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Interface Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type
Eth1/1 Root FWD 4 128.129 P2p Peer(STP)
Eth2/1 Desg FWD 1 128.257 P2p
I've also read through the Release Notes for NX-OS 7.1(0)N1(1) and haven't found anything that sounds suspicous. Do you think this might be a bug or could it also be another problem?
Thanks
MichaelThank you - an additional indication that this is a bug indeed. I'm trying 7.1(0)N1(1a) today, if it doesn't work either I'll downgrade to NX-OS Release 7.NX-OS Release 7.0(5)N1(1a) which is the recommend Version to use anyway. I'll post the results here.
I'll also check with our distributor how we can inform Cisco about a potential bug. -
Hello, I recently purchased a 3560 switch and I am relatively new with VLANs.
What I need to do is quite simple:
I need multiple fastethernet ports into multiple VLANs on a single switch. For that, I need to trunk these ports but nothing seems to work properly.
I created multiple VLANs (vlan 100, 200 and 300), but by default each VLAN can see each other (my allowed vlan list is set to ALL on each port).
When I setup the restrictions of that allowed vlan list, the problem is each port see each other. Example: Port 0/22 is set allowed vlan 100,200 .. but that port still can see vlan 300. I configured Native VLAN on VLAN50 (empty VLAN) for each port on the switch.
I tried on a 3560 and a 2950, but exactly the same problem occurs.
The problem is really basic but I'm on it since 1 week. Is there anyone who could help me please?Check below link for detail configuration & information.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps628/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00800d84be.html
If you want to remove the vlan from the trunk, you can simply use below command :
switchport trunk allowed vlan remove 300
Hope this helps. -
SG 300-10 . Mapping fiber to ethernet ports (vlans?)...
Hi,
the incoming fiber on ports 9 and 10 are on different subnets. I need to map the subnet on port 9 to ethernet ports 1-9 and port 10 is on its own. I have the device IPv4 address set to a static address on the same subnet as port 9. I don't know if there's an easier approach, but I attempted to map the ports using vlans (please see the attached screenshots). We don't yet have the fiber link established for port 10, so I haven't had a chance to test, but I wanted to confirm that my configuration is sound. I used the default vlan for ports 1-9, because I need to manage through that subnet. I added vlan 10 for port 10, but I don't know if I have it configured correctly... Please advise. Thanks..!Hi Greg,
Fiber ethernet is most likely running at 1000Mbits/sec and any Copper Ethernet interfaces on the switch runs at 1000Mbit/sec. personally the only differentiation I make between the copper or fiber are the distances they can run.
I love your screen captures it shows me that ports 1-9 are untagged in VLAN 1 (default VLAN) and port 10 is untagged in VLAN 10.
It tells me that both fiber runs are running untagged Ethernet frames on both fiber runs.
You have associated a IP address onto VLAN1 so you can manage the switch.
but the next question is;
What are you trying to achieve ?
regards Dave -
Hi there:
I'm lost
I know when you have for example two uplink ports that belong at the same vlan, and two or more vNICs asociated at this vlans, pinning happen dinamically
I know how configure a VLAN and assign it to an vNIC
But I can't found how to associate the uplink port to this VLAN in UCS manager
Can anybody help me please
Thank you in advance
AlAl,
In the end-host mode for the ethernet, once you define the vlan in the UCSM the vlan is automatically assgined / configured on all the uplink and the server ports.
Here is a chapter from the config guide:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/unified_computing/ucs/sw/gui/config/guide/2.0/UCSM_GUI_Configuration_Guide_2_0_chapter15.html
However starting with version 2.0 there is a feature under which you can control or confiure different vlans on different uplink ports. This feature is L2-disjoint feature and here is a URL to configure it:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/unified_computing/ucs/sw/gui/config/guide/2.0/UCSM_GUI_Configuration_Guide_2_0_chapter21.html
Hope this helps!
./Abhinav -
Ports/vlan w/o need for acl
On a port or vlan that doesn't need acl filtering is it more effecient to have nothing or a single permit ip any any? I understand that there's a default implied deny ip any any to block anything not allowed in a proceeding permit statement but I assume that only applies if an acl is assigned so I would think if you're going to just permit ip any any in an acl with out any denying before it i's better not to waste any processor time running packets through an acl filter since there's nothing to be rejected anyway.
Hi Vini, if I interpret correctly, there is no need for an acess list as it just takes system resources for no need.
-Tom
Please mark answered for helpful posts -
Hi, is there a way to change the VLAN port on the WAN port of the UC560?
I'm trying to use VLAN50 on WAN port and I'd like to have that setup in the network configuration o the UC560. Is there a way to do this?
Thanks in advance!
JasonDo you know how I can download the CLI and what is the instructions on setup the VLAN50 on WAN port?
I'd like to give that a try and get it working.
Let me know
Thanks
Jason -
Configure port vlan on nexus 5k
i made a change to one port on the first nexus 5k to vlan 24 on port 102/1/45. but looks like i had to make the same change to the other nexus 5k.
why is that? is it because both ports are in a port channel?Hi Tony,
Is that N2K FEX dual homed to two Nexus 5Ks?
Also is vlan 24 a vpc vlan?
if it is, the yes you have to configure both parent switches with the same configurations .
You can also do config-sync but i suggest you just manually hardcode both ports in the N5Ks.
HTH
Jay Ocampo -
Authenticating Trunk Ports - VLAN list
I have a requirement to authenticate trunk ports to wireless access-points on our Cisco switch, By default all ports are access ports and we run MAB authentication. I have managed to change the port to a trunk using Cisco-av-pair attribute in ACS (cisco-av-pair = deivce-traffic-class=switch)
My problem now is that I need to add a VLAN allowed list on the port once it has changed to a trunk port (switchport trunk allowed vlan x,y,z). ideally we would not want to statically assign the VLAN's on each port as an AP could be on any port and may wish to authenticate other trunk ports using different VLAN's in the future. Below is the configuration used on the ports.
cisp enable
interface FastEthernet0/2
description *** Client Device ***
switchport access vlan 2
switchport mode access
no logging event link-status
authentication event fail action next-method
authentication event server dead action reinitialize vlan 3
authentication event server alive action reinitialize
authentication order mab dot1x webauth
authentication priority mab dot1x webauth
authentication port-control auto
authentication fallback GUEST_FALLBACK
mab eap
dot1x pae authenticator
dot1x timeout tx-period 3
dot1x timeout supp-timeout 10
dot1x max-reauth-req 1
dot1x timeout auth-period 600
no cdp enable
spanning-tree portfast
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
JohnHello
I would suggest the following:
>> Arrange for some physical enclosure (locked) or any other physical security control to ensure authorized access to the device. Any technical work-around or band-aid solution should only be temporary. What is someone just switches of your switches? DOS attack!! This could also be done by mistake, resulting in an unstructred threat.
>> Enable monitoring for these switches (ICMP,SNMP) so that you are alerted when they are unplugged.
>> Change the NATIVE VLAN from the default (VLAN 1)
>> Disable Trunk negotiation (ON mode)
Regards
Farrukh -
Unable to add allowed VLANs to TenGig trunk port
Hi,
I've got a ten gig interface on a 6509 running 12.2(33) configured as a trunk, but I've not been able to add any allowed VLANs as I've done before on other ten gig ports on different 6509 chassis. Am I missing something obvious?
I'm assuming that the reason I'm unable to set the encapsulation to dot1q is because the new hardware doens't support ISL, hence no need. The command to add the VLANs however doesn't get rejected, it just doesn't appear to do anything.
I've tried adding single VLANs and multiples, but no joy. Any ideas?
Here's what I've done:
SWITCH_1631(config)#default int t4/1
Interface TenGigabitEthernet4/1 set to default configuration
SWITCH_1631#sh ru int t4/12
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 65 bytes
interface TenGigabitEthernet4/12
no ip address
shutdown
end
SWITCH_1631(config)#int t4/1
SWITCH_1631(config-if)#switchport
SWITCH_1631(config-if)#switchport mode trunk
SWITCH_1631(config-if)#switchport trunk allowed vlan ?
WORD VLAN IDs of the allowed VLANs when this port is in trunking mode
add add VLANs to the current list
all all VLANs
except all VLANs except the following
none no VLANs
remove remove VLANs from the current list
SWITCH_1631(config-if)#switchport trunk allowed vlan add 700
SWITCH_1631(config-if)#
SWITCH_1631#sh vlan id 700
VLAN Name Status Ports
700 VLAN_NAME active <snip>
SWITCH_1631#sh ru int t4/1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 74 bytes
interface TenGigabitEthernet4/1
switchport
switchport mode trunk
endSteve,
Thanks for getting back to me. You're right that it is by default a dot1q trunk allowing all VLANs, therefore it should work for what I want to do.
Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native vlan
Gi3/39 on 802.1q trunking 1
Te4/1 on 802.1q trunking 1
Po1 on 802.1q trunking 50
Po2 on 802.1q trunking 50
Po3 on 802.1q trunking 50
Po4 on 802.1q trunking 50
Po5 on 802.1q trunking 50
Port Vlans allowed on trunk
Gi3/39 15-16,20-23,30,401,608
Te4/1 1-4094
Po1 10,13,20-21,25,30,50,52,61,70,600,700-701,950
Po2 10,20,30,50,52,61,70,600,700-701,950
Po3 10,20,30,50,61,70,600,700-701,950
Po4 10,20,30,50,61,70,600,700-701,950
Po5 2-3,10-23,25-26,30,35-36,40,50-53,56,58,61,65,70,77,101-102,145-146,155-158,401-402,600-602,608,700-701,800,950
The problem was that I've always been advised that best practise is to only allow the VLANs that are actually required on a trunk to avoid broadcasting traffic unnecessarily. I worked out what the issue was though, and it was a pretty simple one!
Once I saw that 1-4094 was allowed I tried "switchport trunk allowed vlan remove 700" which worked and left me with 1-699,701-4094.
Then I realised what the problem was trying to use the "add" command when all possible VLANs had already been added. As soon as I got rid of it and used "switchport trunk allowed vlan 700" followed by "switchport trunk allowed vlan add 701" I was back in business.
So it was a very simple issue, but thank you Steve for pointing me in the right direction and confirming that all the VLANs were already allowed! -
RV 120w ethernet port static VLAN assignment
I have a rv 120w with vlan enabled and default vlan which is on our corporate lan and dhcp disabled and a second vlan for a public wireless network with dhcp enabled. I can tag the 4 external ethernet ports with either vlan but how do I assign a port to the acual vlan so that devices connected to that port will be on the public vlan rather than the default? Tagged or untagged all 4 ports are on the corporate lan/vlan.
Thanks
GeorgeHi, My name is Eric Moyers. I am a Network Support Engineer in the Cisco Small Business Support Center. Thank you for using the Cisco Community Post Forums.
First let me apologoze that you have not been contacted before now. I have done some research and reviewed the case that you currently have opened with our Level 2 support (620535517). You are correct until that is fixed, the rest of your configuration is mute.
To answer your questions though:
1) How should port 3 be configured on the RV 120W to allow a proper trunk connection between the WAP4410N, bridge 1, to the WAP4410N, bridge 2?
A) See Below
2) How should the port 2 be configured on the RV 120W for the dumb switch that should be VLAN 100 only?
A) See Below
3) Why must you have a single untagged VLAN for each port, no more, no less? The untagged VLAN is the Native Port or Management VLAN
A) For a trunk to work properly that untagged VLAN has to be there.
4) Do you see anything horribly wrong with my proposed course of action?
A)Not as it stands, but would need to fully test once rest of network is up and running.
Port VLANs Table
Port Name
Mode
PVID
VLAN Membership
Port 1
Trunk
1
1u, 2t, 100t
Port 2
Access
100
100t
Port 3
Trunk
1
1u, 2t, 100t
Port 4
Trunk
1
1u, 2t, 100t
Thanks
Eric Moyers
Cisco Network Support Engineer
SBSC Wireless and Surveillance SME
CCNA, CCNA-Wireless
1-866-606-1866 -
Query on Vocie and Data VLan on same Swithc port
Hi All,
This is query regarding allowing both Vocie and data Vlans on a single switch port. I knew tehre are different ways to configure and acheive this, but not sure how techncially they are different from each other>
Way 1:
interface FastEthernet1/5
description *** IP Phone/Data Port ***
switchport trunk native vlan 10
switchport mode trunk
switchport voice vlan 16
no logging event link-status
no snmp trap link-status
mls qos trust cos
spanning-tree portfast
sh int trunk
Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native vlan
Fa1/5 on 802.1q trunking 10
Fa1/7 on 802.1q trunking 10
Fa1/12 on 802.1q trunking 10
Fa1/13 on 802.1q trunking 10
Fa1/14 on 802.1q trunking 10
Port Vlans allowed on trunk
Fa1/5 1-1005
Fa1/7 1-1005
Fa1/12 1-1005
Fa1/13 1-1005
Fa1/14 1-1005
Port Vlans allowed and active in management domain
Fa1/5 1,10,16
Fa1/7 1,10,16
Fa1/12 1,10,16
Fa1/13 1,10,16
Fa1/14 1,10,16
Port Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned
Port Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned
Fa1/5 1,10,16
Fa1/7 1,10,16
Fa1/12 1,10,16
Fa1/13 1,10,16
Fa1/14 1,10,16
sh vlan-switch
VLAN Name Status Ports
1 default active Fa1/0, Fa1/1, Fa1/2, Fa1/3
Fa1/4, Fa1/6, Fa1/8, Fa1/9
Fa1/10, Fa1/11, Fa1/15
10 DVLAN active
16 VVLAN active Fa1/0, Fa1/1, Fa1/2, Fa1/3
Fa1/4, Fa1/6, Fa1/8, Fa1/9
Fa1/10, Fa1/11, Fa1/15
In the above config, the port Fa 1/5 which is currnetly up and running( this port is ocnencted with IP phoen and a PC) is not shown in sh vlan-switch output as assigned to vlan 10 or vlan 16. Not sure it is becuase the output was taken from ISR rotuer with NM 16-ESW module .
sh int fa 1/5 switchp
Name: Fa1/5
Switchport: Enabled
Administrative Mode: trunk
Operational Mode: trunk
Administrative Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q
Operational Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q
Negotiation of Trunking: Disabled
Access Mode VLAN: 0 ((Inactive))
Trunking Native Mode VLAN: 10 (DVLAN)
Trunking VLANs Enabled: ALL
Trunking VLANs Active: 1,10,16
Priority for untagged frames: 0
Override vlan tag priority: FALSE
Voice VLAN: 16
Appliance trust: none
In above ocnfig, the port is configured as trunk and hence it can carry multiple vlan traffic on swithcport. As IP phones will have inbuilt switch which runs DTP by default and CDP to reciognize the conencted devcies. I am not sure how this config works as even it's configured as trunk the DTP negotiation is disabled and how phone switch can differentiate the voice frames and data frames. Please explain in loigcal as it's known that as we have confgiured vlan 10 as native and vocie vlan 16 as trunk it carries the voice traffic.
Way 2:
interface FastEthernet1/2
description *** IP Phone/Data Port ***
switchport access vlan 10
switchport mode access
switchport voice vlan 16
no logging event link-status
no snmp trap link-status
mls qos trust cos
spanning-tree portfast
In the above config, even the port is access it's carrying multiple vlan traffic despite of being trunk port. Not sure how the trunk will be formed even DTP neogotiation is off. Isi t because of voice vlan command and if so what it deos exactly. Please can anyone elaborate in detail. Sorry, if my post is big and confusing
sh int fa 1/2 switchport
Name: Fa1/2
Switchport: Enabled
Administrative Mode: static access
Operational Mode: static access
Administrative Trunking Encapsulation: negotiate
Operational Trunking Encapsulation: native
Negotiation of Trunking: OffSwitch - Phone - PC
1. First question:
# int f0/1
# switchport mode access
# spanning-tree portfast
# switchport access vlan 50
# switchport voice vlan 10
This is the ideal way to configure and in all latest IOS Switches and in latest ISR routers, we do this as the command "switch port voice vlan" command says to switch port that it carries the voice traffic as tagged and PC as untagged.
As we all know the default switch port of a switch will be either Dynamic auto or Dynamic Desirable which means DTP is on and in turn it means negotiation of trunking is ON. This is as per my understanding.
The Sub-Questions for 1st Question are below:
1 Does the trunk negotiation happen between Access Switch switch port and Mini 3 Port Switch within the IP Phone. If mini switch in IP PHone negotiates to form trunk based on DTP then what’s the default switch port mode of mini switch in the IP Phone.
2. As in above config we are no where mentioning the port to be trunk. But it’s still allowing multiple vlan’s traffic to carry on access port. The switchport mode is access when you do “ sh int fa 0/1 swithcport.”. Is it the swithcport voice vlan command does the magic?
2. Second Question:
# int f0/1
# switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
# switchport trunk native vlan 10 (data VLAN)
# switchport mode trunk
# swichport voice vlan 15
The Sub-Questions for 2nd Question are below:
When do we use this configuration.? In my set-up the above config is seen on 2811 ISR routers with NM-16ESW modules. Can’t we configure the data vlan a switch port access vlan 10 , instead of trunk native vlan.
Maybe you are looking for
-
I have been using firefox for years. I downloaded the latest version and at the conclusion of the down load I was refussed access to the internet. Something about Proxy???? I checked my firewalls and security and they said that mozilla was allowed bu
-
Dear reader, I am facing this grave problem while using the 9iAS. My Forms server is running perfect when started but the Report server is showing an error while starting and is showing the error "Service returned service specific error 186". I am un
-
IPhoto '08- can't see photo files for back up
I had upgraded to iLife '08. I usually back up current photo files to an external drive by going in iPhoto folder in users, select the new photos by folder and drag into my back up drive. Now I click on the iPhoto '08 icon and it acts like an applica
-
SRM Extraction Queue is filled Unnecessary -- to BI load
HI We are running some data loads from SRM to BI . We have a Strange Issue: Without triggering process chains or Infopack groups in BI side, Extraction queues (SMQ1 TRFCs ) are filled with some entries. It will causes the SRM loads in a very sl
-
Verizon DSL, Westell 6100 Modem and Linksys router
If anyone is having a hard time getting these three to work together to get on-line, I know your pain. I've spent the better part of two days trying to get these devices to talk to each other. After hours spent trying different combinations and littl