Sale Order Inconsistancy

Dear All,
I have an scenario, I am going to assign the serial numbers in Delivery of the sale order only, and not in
Production Order.
I Created the serial Number, in IQ01-as 'S' , and assigned at the time of PGI in sale Order.
When there is a customer return and i created the sale order with diffrent order type (return) using the reference of billing document number of earlier sale order for which i did PG/Billing.
But At the Time of of doing PGR for this order i am giving the same serial number which i gave earlier, since the Item and customer is same, But system is showing the error/Warning 'System status ECUS is active (EQU 10000338)'
Read as:
     {  System status ECUS is active (EQU 10000338)
Message no. BS011
Diagnosis
System status ECUS (At customer site) is active for object EQU 10000338. When this status is active, the system issues a warning before executing transaction 'Delivery note assignment' }
Now If change the system status to Forbidden and made it to error it works fine in case of avoiding the same serial number being sent to diffrent customer for same mat code.
This perticular message shall behave diffrently,
1) When I do PGI it should not allow the PGI with the same serial number or the used one.
2) When I do Customer return and do PGR it should allow since the same number i am going to take back.
The Serialization procedures used are: OIS2
SDCC     Completness check for delivery     03     02
SDCR     Completion check IR delivery     02     02
SDLS     Maintain delivery     02     02
SDRE     Maintain returns delivery     02     02
Please help me out guys..
Regards
Raghu

Hello Raghu
When you assign the serial number at the time of PGI system created a master record for serial and material number ( if in your system automatioc creation of equipment if defined it will create so in the background).The system sets the status of equipment as "AT CUSTOMER LOCATION"
I remember I had this issue once but one simple way is to go in the transaction IQ02 and change the status to some other options I dont remember now...This will allow you to PGR with same serial number.
Thanks
Vikas

Similar Messages

  • Error at sales order: Inconsistent characteristic value assignment

    Hi SAPians
    There is a problem in variant configuration. I have configurable materials at sales order level with BOMs and super BOMs. When I am executing the scenario, not able to process further after selecting characteristic values for a configurable material. The error saying " Inconsistent  characteristic value assignment". I checked all the relevant master data, every thing is okay. But I am not able to proceed further. Can any one provide some valuable inputs for this.
    Raksha.

    Hi
    Did u create variant table (CU61) if not plz and try to make it by tick mark of Decision table..
    u can check assignmebt consitance thru CU60 ..if there again blank plz maintain it manually..
    basically wt happened during creation of Characteristics and assignment of value in value tab .. there is indicator ..which influence assignment consistance..
    hope u may get clue.
    correct me if i went wrong..
    thanks
    mk

  • ECM check for sale order

    Dear Experts
    I am working for steel industry client.
    we are facing as issue of Inconsistency in  old sale orders,suppose we  change a dependency the existing & older sales orders are getting effected,can some body suggest some procedure to avoid sale order inconsistency.
    can we use ECM for the same to put a check for control.
    Regards
    sandeep

    pls check,
    following user exit,
    User-Exit Patterns:
    MV45* - Sales
    MV50* - Delivery
    RV60* - Billing
    Check include MV45AFZZ.
    USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT.
    USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE.
    and put check if bom & routing is not created then it is not updated in table.
    or check the costing status in so, if it contains ant error then dont save.
    Regards,
    Arpit

  • Sales Order: total weight inconsistency when using sales type BOM

    Hello!
      The case is as folows:
      I create a Sales Order, with one line. But this is a master item (sales type bill of materials), it has two components. That's why sbo puts two additional lines in the document. So this sales order will have 3 lines.
      The master item's weight is 10kg, the components's are 3kg and 4kg.
      If I press ctrl-W, the "Volume and Weight Calculation" window shows only the master item, and 10 kg.
      If I send the document to printer, i can see 17kg total amount.
      The layout uses "Sales Order:weight" to show the total amount, and it works well in other cases. But not in this one because every single item is taken into account, regardless of being the master or a component.
      I don't know if it is a bug, or we should use another field to display total amount.
      We might forbid to fill sales weight info for master items as well. This way the weight would be correct (because master weight is always the sum of its components' weight - unlike my sample above) But in this case the 'Volume and weight calculation" would be incorrect.
    Regards, Gergely Humicskó
    Edited by: Gergely Humicsko on Jun 3, 2010 2:58 AM

    Hello Gergely...
    You might want to post this on the SAP Business One Product Development Collaboration Forum as this sounds like it would definitely be an enhancement to SAP B1.  I have no idea if SAP looks at these or even does anything with the entries since they do not provide any kind of feedback, but maybe they might consider it one day...
    Take Care - Zal

  • Inconsistency in BW reportdue to Sales orders archiving

    1.) Sometimes Sales Contracts/Sales Orders get archived when saved.  Sales documents u201Cnot in the database or have been archivedu201D as per ECC design are coming up in the BW reports, one of the reports being the open contracts reports.
    All the data is coming from ECC.
    2.) Since these contracts are coming up in the open contracts report but do not exist in the ECC database, the business is getting contracts that are not relevant to them. Is there any way to control that if the contract is archived when saved should not consider by the BW report. Without BW reload how can we prevent ECC to not to send archived Sales document to BW.

    Dear Naveen,
    It sounds like you are getting an update termination while saving the sales orders/contracts. This means that the system could not save the document correctly. A document number is generated but no sales order / contract was created. If this happens again you can get more details on what happened in transaction ST22 (for the short dump) and SM13 (update rrequests).
    It seems the issue of BW being updated with the order number could be caused by user exit code.
    The following is the call stack when the user saves the sales order:
    program MV45AF0b_BELEG_SICHERN   (update document)
    CALL FUNCTION 'RV_SALES_DOCUMENT_UPDATE' IN UPDATE TASK
    * Userexit
          PERFORM USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT.
    * Statistik-Fortschreibung
          PERFORM STATISTIK_UPDATE.
      COMMIT WORK.
    ENDFORM.
    -> 1) all internal tables e.g. xvbap and yvbap are passed to the
          update module RV_SALES_DOCUMENT_UPDATE in update task.
    -> 2) afterwards  USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT and Statistic update is called.
    -> commit work initiates update.
    Issues could be caused if values are changed in the user exit. If for example an error occurs after the COMMIT WORK and the system needs to make a rollback. Please have your ABAPer go through the short dump in ST22 if this issue occurs again. Also check user exits in MV45AFZZ, MV45AFZA and MV45AFZB to ensure there are no COMMIT WORK statements in your custom code.
    I hope this helps.
    Best regards,
    Ian Kehoe

  • Inconsistent updation of sales group in Sales order and invoice

    Dear all,
        The sales office and sales group is properly updated in the specific sales area master data of the customer but not flowing in the sales order and subsquently in the invoice. For some documents it gets updated and for others the filed is blank.
    I have checked the master data and also the documents and found no errors. Please help in how to solve the issue. I need 100% updation of sales office and sales group in the order and invoice. Please advice how to solve the issue.
    Regards,
    Parthasarathy.R

    Dear Parthasarathy,
    Request You to post the same query in SD Forum
    You will get quick response there
    this is PP forum
    Hope You Understand
    Regards
    kumar

  • Inconsistency in Sales Orders Assignment in Planning Book

    Hi Experts
    When i create sales Orders in ECC,sales orders are assigned  to the Planning Book but some times when i change the Quantity for the existing salers Orders , Changes are not getting reflected in the Planning Book Immediatly.
    Some times system is giving pop up like 'sales order does not exist'.
    When i delete existing sales order in ECC, the incomming Qty in Planning book should be changed to zero, but its not reflecting.
    What measures we need to take to prevent such inconsistencies?rds
    Thanks in Adavance
    Regards
    Vasu

    Hi Vasu,
    In general, the above are product allocation consistency checks which
    checks the following
    These will display the confirmation date, quantities, used product
    allocation settings, sales order , product etc.,
    1) Checks if is there any single assignments without an incoming
    orders quantity
    2) Checks if is there any single assignements without a sales order
    due to error
    3) Checks if is there any single assignements without a characteristic
    combination in place.
    SAP recommends to check the affected sales orders again.
    Regards
    R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

  • Copied layout is not working for Sales order item assinment block

    Hi Experts,
    I copied the standard componet BT115IT_SLS/items view layout  with custom role configuration key and worked fine.
    I have added one more field to the item view  with the same configuration and saved .When I opended the sales order in the WEB UI , The item assigment block is displaying with complete  BTADMINI context fileds and This is the issue.
    I have seen configured fields only in  the personalization and I have downloaded the items assigment block data to Execl.In the Execl sheet I can able to see the configured fields (availble fileds in the configuration tab in component workbemch) data only.
    But Items assignment block is displaying all the fileds (taking  from the context node BTADMINI).
    I have deleted existing customer configuration and again copied  from the standard layout.But I got the same issue.
    I have wriiten some code in the ON_NEW_FOCUS and commented the code.Still it not working.
    Please help me , where I have done the mistake and provide me some inputs.
    Thanks,
    Venkky

    Hi Experts,
    Solved isuues myself.
    The problem is inconsistency of BTAdminI context node . I have deleted the view enhancement and again enhanced the view .I copied the layout with customer role key and dispalyed expected layout.
    Thanks,
    Venkky

  • How to swap between to sets of item categories in sales order

    Hi,
    We receive Idocs from a different system that creates sales order in the R/3 system. For some of these, we want to be able to use an alternative sourcing mode - basically switch between standard POs and 3rd Party POs. The orders has many items, and we find it impractical to manually update all items - also because the order might contain different materials with maybe 5-10 different item categories, that needs to be changed to 5-10 others. This will be very difficult for our business users, since we do not have a simple naming convention of item categories to ease this.
    So we are looking for alternative ways, where we can change all items by changing on header level.
    We have thought of these alternatives :
    1. Change distribution channel. Requires all materials and customers to be set up in 2 DCs - not realistically.
    2. Change sales order types using VOV8 alternatives. This seems not to be allowed for materials in BOMs and with E consumption. See other thread named "Can not change SO order type - disallowed by item settings" for more details.
    3. What we we really need is changes on schedule line level, and I suppose we could have a logic in MV45AFZZ change this dependent on some user field. But I don't think this will work, as other settings controlled by requirement class etc. will be inconsistent.
    Proposals for this are welcome - it should be a common issue.

    Hi,
    We ended up designing a solution where item category was swapped by shipping condition. For shipping condition 11, we simulated that a specific 'usage' was active. It required a few tricks to get the Source determination to run, and a further trick to avoid a re-pricing B to nuke the pricing conditions. This is still draft code, but it seems to work :
    Enhancement points ES_SAPFV45P / VBAP_FUELLEN_10 : Ensure ‘usage’ is set according to shipping condition
    data : ld_active type c.
    data : ld_no_pricing_vwpos type c.
    constants : lc_vwpos_no_pricing(20) type c value 'VWPOS_NO_PRICING'.
    Fake change to ensure new item cat determination
    ( conditions when this is active, setting ld_active )
      if sy-subrc is initial
      and ld_active = 'X'            "Action enabled for company
      and t180-trtyp ca 'HV'.       " Create/change mode
    case vbak-vsbed.
      when '11'. " Special logic
        t184_vwpos = 'Z001'. " Special T184 usage for direct
        clear *vbap-mandt. " simulate change of *vbap
        matnr_changed = 'X'." simulate change
        ld_no_pricing_vwpos = 'X'. " Flag for suppress B repricing
      when '12'. " standard logic
        clear t184_vwpos.  " Standard T184 usage for indirect
        clear *vbap-mandt. " simulate change of *vbap
        matnr_changed = 'X'." simulate change
        ld_no_pricing_vwpos = 'X'. " Flag for suppress B repricing
      when others.
        clear ld_no_pricing_vwpos.
      endcase.
    Memory ID read in MV45AFZB, form USEREXIT_NEW_PRICING_VBAP
      export ld_no_pricing_vwpos to memory id lc_vwpos_no_pricing.
      endif.
    MV45AFZB, form USEREXIT_SOURCE_DETERMINATION : Ensure item category determinations takes ‘usage’ into consideration
    ( conditions when this is active, setting ld_active )
      if sy-subrc is initial
      and w_active = 'X'            "Action enabled for company
      and t180-trtyp ca 'HV'.       " Create/change mode
    Get higher-level item category
      clear lv_uepos. clear  gv_spp_pstyv.
      lv_uepos = vbap-uepos.
      do 10 times. " to eliminate phantom levels
      read table xvbap with key posnr = lv_uepos.
      if sy-subrc = 0 and xvbap-pstyv ne lv_zvco.
      gv_spp_pstyv = xvbap-pstyv.
      exit.
      elseif sy-subrc eq 0 and xvbap-pstyv eq lv_zvco.
      lv_uepos = xvbap-uepos.
      elseif sy-subrc ne 0.
      exit.
      endif.
      enddo.
    t184_vwpos set in FV45PFAP_VBAP_FUELLEN
      call function 'RV_VBAP_PSTYV_DETERMINE'  "Determine using T184
             exporting
               t184_auart   = tvak-auart " Order type
               t184_mtpos   = maapv-mtpos "Item category group
               t184_uepst   = gv_spp_pstyv  "Higher level-SPP item category
               t184_vwpos   = t184_vwpos " Usage from FV45PFAP_VBAP_FUELLEN
               vbap_pstyv_i = ''
             importing
               vbap_pstyv   = vbap-pstyv.
    endif.
    MV45AFZB, form USEREXIT_NEW_PRICING_VBAP : Ensure dynamic change of item categories does not trigger repricing type B.
    data : ld_no_pricing_vwpos type c.
    constants : lc_vwpos_no_pricing(20) type c value 'VWPOS_NO_PRICING'.
    Memory ID set in FV45PFAP_VBAP_FUELLENP, FORM VBAP_FUELLEN
    import ld_no_pricing_vwpos from memory id lc_vwpos_no_pricing.
    if sy-subrc is initial
    and ld_no_pricing_vwpos = 'X'.
    Skip repricing when mass change item cat
      clear new_pricing.
    endif.
    I hope someone will find it useful. Please notice that Enhancement points was required, so it will not work in older R/3 versions.

  • Closed Sales orders in Open Item list

    Hi all,
    I facing a problem,
    I have closed few sales orders through right click and close but those are still visible in open sales order list report,
    can anybody please help me in this regards,
    Regards,
    Atul Joshi

    Hi
    It looks to me was database inconsistency however you said it didn't show any result .
    Since sales order donot post journal entry ,you can do it
    1>> Go to particular sales order
    2>>  in menubar ,go to data >> close
    (considering the this sales order was supposed to be close ,but somehow it is open)
    it will ask you to do you want to close  and yes .
    And also ,if you are SAP 2007 A  patch 35, please upgrade as i have seen a lot of thread  regarding this particular patch (Not mandatory just suggestion)
    Before you do this , I would suggest you to back up the file and test it in your test environment .
    If all of this didn't resolve ,I would suggest you to log to sap for support .
    Thank you
    bishal

  • How to release Stock blocked against deleted line items from  Sales order.

    We have Scenario as follows.
    Sales order made for  items available in stock.  Deleted few lineitems from sales order balance items delivered and invoiced. Sales cycle is complete in all sense.
    What we have noticed is when we are creating new sales order / Delivery for deleted items from above Sales order it shows deleted quantity is blocked against old sales order. These line items are no longer
    available in old sales order since it is deleted also it is not appearing in open sales order report (VA05).
    Overall stock available is same as quantity mentioned in deleted line item.
    In MD04 - Sales requirenment transaction it shows sales order / line item against which it is blocked.
                    i.e deleted line item.
    How to release these stock and make available for sales. Any standard process available ? or any other solutions
    Thanks & Regards,

    I got a solution for my question from other forum. for info
    Go to SE38 and enter program SDRQCR21 then execute...
    Enter line item which is blocked for sales order in MD04 and enter plant then check Data
    transfer box and uncheck other boxes... It will pop up information and click yes...
    You will get one report and Stock inconsistency will go off and then check it in MD04....
    regards

  • How to remove sales orders from VL10A

    HI All,
    I had an issue from production system. Few orders are already delivery and accounting completed, still those orders are being displayed in VL10A. I have checked those orders and there are not schedule lines due for shipping. Sales order/delivery/invoice shows completed in the document flow.
    For the timebeing i have given workaround solution to exclude those orders from selection screen in VL10A.
    Could you suggest the permanent solution not to display those orders in VL10A, which are already shipped and no due for shipping.
    Thanks in advance and waiting for your suggestion.
    Regards,
    Vamsi.

    HI Raghu,
    Thanks for your inputs of the program, but it has no options to choose.
    Analysis:
    This could have happened due to Inconsistency in delivery due index tables.
    I referred OSS Notes: 128947 & 178328, executing  the reorganizing program u201CRVV05IVBu201D for the problematic sales orders to remove inconsistency.
    Please ensure to execute the report with proper selections in the initial screen even online i.e on business hours..
    Hope this would help to anyone in future.
    Regards,
    Vamsi.

  • Sales orders in /SAPAPO/RRP3

    Colleagues,
    I have a question regarding the display of sales orders/deliveries within the transaction /SAPAPO/RRP3.  We are currently utilising SCM7.0 and my question realtes to the following process.
    1. Sales orders are created in ECC and transferred to APO
    2. Sales orders are visible within the ransaction /SAPAPO/RRP3, with the quantity and dates being the same as the sales order
    3. Deliveries are created from the sales order in ECC and transferred to APO
    4. Deliveries are transferred to APO and also visible within the transaction /SAPAPO/RRP same date and quanity.
    My quesition is should both the Sales order and delivery be visible within the transaction /SAPAPO/RRP3, the sales order exists with zero quantity and the delivery exists with the correct quntity and date.
    I cannot find any key completion erors, or inconsistency messages in any of the logs.
    Regards
    Paul

    Hi ,
    In a simple Full Delivery scenario, you will only see a delivery for a sales order in /sapapo/rrp3 and the corresponding Sales Order will not be seen once a delivery is created. But in case you have multiple schedule lines(Delivery Proposal) and partial deliveries are allowed, you will still see the sales order and the delivery.
    Let's say you have a Sales Order with confirmation situation like below
                                                                                    Req.Qty              Conf Qty              Req.Dt     Conf.Dt
    example, Sales Order 100034/0010/001          100                       0                          05/13    
                   Sales Order 100034/0010/002                                      50                                         05/17
                   Sales Order 100034/0010/003                                      50                                         05/18
    This will look something like this in RRP3(assuming transit, pick/pack, load equals zero)
    05/13        100034/0010/001          100-       0
    05/17        100034/0010/002            0         50
    05/18        100034/0010/003            0         50
    05/13        100034/0010/001                 100-       0
    05/17        Delivery#/0010                       0         50
    05/18        100034/0010/003                   0         50
    If a delivery is created for first confirmed schedule line, you will see the sales order first schedule replaced by the delivery like shown above.
    If you don't see this behavior and if you suspect some inconsistencies, try running CCR report with Sales Orders.
    Hope it helps.
    Regards
    Mohan
    Edited by: V R Mohan  Chunchu on May 14, 2010 7:33 PM

  • SAP Mobile Sales 2.0 delta load issue for Sales Orders

    Hello,
    we have used Mobile Sales 2.0 with a Windows app for a while now. Our current issue is that sales reps won't see any historical sales order data on their devices.
    Background
    Due customer requirements, we need to make small changes to customer master data attributes and reload all customers from ERP to CRM. Then we ran delta loads (MAS_PARTNER followed by all other objects) to DOE, in which virtually all 5000+ customer accounts were compared. The delta load ran for about 3 days (some performance bottleneck we haven't located yet).
    During the delta load, data on devices was inconsistent. Accounts were missing and all transaction data disappeared. After the delta loads, all accounts and contacts are OK, save for a few. Data from activities (appointments, tasks) have reappeared, as they should. Only sales orders won't reappear. The sales orders exist in the backend and belong to active accounts and sales reps.
    Settings and troubleshooting so far
    We don't have any limitations for sales orders in CRM Sales Mobile configuration.
    We've run delta loads for all objects in transaction SDOE_LOAD.
    MAS_CUSTOMIZATION etc seem fine.
    We've re-run initial load for sales orders from CRM.
    In the test system, we've even reinitialized the whole CDS database on DOE and on the devices, then re-ran the loads.
    Checked steps suggested in discussion
    SAP CRM 2.0 initial load issue
    Historical sales orders (those created before the master data reload) exist in the backend, but don't show up on the device.
    If I change one of those historical sales orders in the backend, it gets sent to the device.
    If I create a new sales order in the backend or on the device, it is saved and replicated just fine.
    To sum it up, it seems DOE is unable to identify the sales orders relevant for replication.

    First Doubt i got clarify by my self as we can go with Unwired Runtime option .
    But i still have doubt in :
    2. How can i Modifying the Main Menu for iOS.
    i am able to customize the same for windows using files SybaseCRM.Configuration.xml file.
    Same how can i do for iphone/ipad.

  • Error "Item 000010 does not exist" while creating sales order in VA01

    Dear All,
    As per customer requirement we are trying to validate shipping data( item level) and unloading point( item level)  by customer enhancement.
    Enhancement:       V45A0003
    Function Module:    EXIT_SAPMV45A_003
    INCLUDE:                ZXVVAU05
    Inside include we have written validation code that if user enters any wrong value for shipping data or unloading data
    system will throw error message accordingly.
    It is working fine and we are getting error message if wrong shipping data or unloading data is entered.
    But after the error message is displayed if we try to save the sales order  again system throws a STOP message as a POPUP
    saying "Item 000010 does not exist".
    Now,if we enter proper shipping data or unloading data and try to save the salesorder it is throwing error "Item 000010 does not exist"..
    Please let me know your valuable input on this.
    Regards
    Arindam
    Edited by: Arindam Ganguly on Mar 11, 2010 1:55 PM

    It sounds like your error routine has prevented the insertion of the data in VBAP or XVBAP internal tables.  Therefore, upon return to the screen and SAVE, SAP is examining the VBAP or XVBAP table, comparing to the 'I' index table probably, and finding that there is supposed to be an item 10, but it's not in the necessary table(s).    This may be resulting because your internal tables are now inconsistent.
    Look at where your inserted error coding is occurring...you may want to move that to the SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE routine in MV45AFZZ, so that everything will have been built, and a final check of the content will stop the sales order save until the data is corrected.
    Edited by: Breakpoint on Mar 11, 2010 3:29 PM

Maybe you are looking for