Sales orded tax issue

Hi
can any body tell me the setting and link between sales order and tax normally where do we make setting between sales and sales tax, any help on this will highly appreciated.
thanks

The link is your tax code. In VK11, for tax condition type UTXJ / MWST, for a given combination, you would maintain a tax code based on which only, when you create a sale order, it is fetched.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Similar Messages

Sales order Tax issue

Hi All,
I am having a issue with sales order that calculated taxes. When created the invoice, no taxes were calculated. Went back into the invoice (VF02) and went to the header pricing condition. Did not make any changes, but green arrowed back. Then went into each line item and the taxes are now calculated. Posted the invoice to accounting and taxes are showing up.
The defect is.... We should NOT have to go into the header pricing condition tab in order to calculate taxes for the line items.
Regards,
Santosh

Santosh,
The first question I would ask is: do you have any user exits implemented for pricing condition type in your invoice document? If yes, analyze the code related to Tax. If not, contact your SD consultant to check the pricing procedure configuration.
Thanks & Regards,
Sandip Kamdar

With reference sale orde text issue

While creating sale order with reference to exisiting sale order of document type OR , the text should not be copied.
What i did is while creating with reference to existing sale order when ever the text comes for copying i will select delete option so that it wont copied to current sale order creating, What i did is a correct way or any other method is there to stop copying the text during with reference to sale order creation.
Thanks,
Suresh

Dear suresh,
As per the understanding of your requirement,
Instead of doing that why don't you delete the text determination procedure for the document which the text is applying.
You can use the transaction code VOTXN you select the sales document header/item in that select change.Then go to Text procedure assignment
Hope it will be use full.
Let me know if you have any further clarifications
Thanks&Regards
Raghu.k

Sales view / Tax classification upload in material master - LSMW

Hi All,
While Creating in LSMW using RMDATIND Batch input method for material mater creation . I am getting an error of "you have not fully maintained tax classification" (M172 error message).
LSMW details are as follows:
Project, sub-proj, object : SCIMM,SCIMM,SCI_MM_CREATE
Please suggest the field value mapping section of LSMW and suggest me how to fix the problem.
When I create masters manually, in sales view/tax classification 4 tax categories (3 for CA CTX1,CTX2,CTX3 and one for US UTXJ) are getting populated automatically and I need to key-in only 0 or 1 for tax values (ex material :KCC9800MEKIT for sales org 2000, dc 70, dv 70).
Please sugget me how to fix this issue.
thanks
PRadeep

Hi Murugesh,
Thanks for your response on this query. I read the link contents.
LSMW TAX classification for materials
In the above thread, you have specified
1. If you have a separate file for tax codes to be applied for different materials then you need to map the records of this file to BMMH2 ( multiple records for a material possible for different countries). Then you need to map BGR00, BMM00 & BMMH1 with another header file with one record for material for the corresponding records on file which correcponds to BMMH2.
I require your help to implement the above step. As mentioned by you, I have 3 tax codes for CA and one for US (2 diff countries) for each material to be maintained in Tax classification.
I have created a main source structure SS which has fields for all views (basic view, sales view, purchasing, plant/sloc and warehouse). I have created a substructure SSTAX for main source structure SS for Tax fields (Aland, taxty,taxm1) and assigned to BMMH2. Will this work or we need to create two source structure (at same level) for this requirement.
I am bit confused on how to link these two input files. I created one record for material xyz in header file and 4 records in tax file (4 tax categories ctx1,ctx2,ctx3 and utxj). How to create one to one relationship working between header and tax file. How the tax file structure will be for 10 material records?
LSMW Direct Input Method RMDATIND tax classification material
In the above thread, I find difficulty to follow your steps for same tax data applicable for all materials.
1.enable the
Extras->DisplayVariant
In LSMW transaction, I find diffculty to locate the above option.
from the menu of the LSMW & check all the check boxes. Now you see the
__END_OF_RECORD__
for the structure
BMMH2which has to be mapped with the input structure in the Maintain structure relations step.
double click on the __END_OF_RECORD__
Again I find difficulty to follow the above step. Please explain me step by step to reach below abap editor step.
which will lead to ABAP editor & then put the following code:
Canada
bmmh2-stype = '3'.
bmmh2-aland = 'CA'.
bmmh2-taty1 = 'CTX1'.
bmmh2-taxm1 = '1'.
transfer_record.
bmmh2-stype = '3'.
bmmh2-aland = 'CA'.
bmmh2-taty1 = 'CTX2'.
bmmh2-taxm1 = '1'.
transfer_record.
Thank you very much for your help and time. I am sure this will be helpful for Pradeep as well.
Thanks and regrads
Varadharajan

Sales view / Tax classification upload in material master

Hi All,
While Creating in LSMW using RMDATIND Batch input method for material mater creation . I am getting an error of "you have not fully maintained tax classification" (M172 error message).
LSMW details are as follows:
Project, sub-proj, object : SCIMM,SCIMM,SCI_MM_CREATE
Please suggest the field value mapping section of LSMW and suggest me how to fix the problem.
When I create masters manually, in sales view/tax classification 4 tax categories (3 for CA CTX1,CTX2,CTX3 and one for US UTXJ) are getting populated automatically and I need to key-in only 0 or 1 for tax values (ex material :KCC9800MEKIT for sales org 2000, dc 70, dv 70).
Please sugget me how to fix this issue.
thanks
PRadeep

HI,
instead of LSMW..try with BDC by SHDB---batch input transaction recording.

Profit center splitting - Intercompany FB60 - Sales/Use Tax Vendor invoices

We are implementing Use Tax calculations for Vendor invoices and are stuck on an issue with profit center splitting when entering intercompany AP transactions (FB60).     The tax postings of the non-leading company are being split between the two company profit centers.
When posting a vendor invoice with more than one company the tax items of the leading company are posting with the correct profit center but tax items if the non-leading company are splitting between the profit centers of the two companies.   The total amount of the tax is still correct, just part of it is posted to the wrong profit center.
We are assuming this is a document splitting issue but changes to document splitting configuration did not get the desired effect of not splitting the tax accounts.
Are there any suggestions of particular areas of document splitting that we should look into or other areas that might be causing this profit center splitting for the tax items? Any ideas would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Jeff

Hi Murlidhar,
Here's a sample transaction with the problem results we are seeing. Normal AP transactions are posting fine, it is only when Sales/use tax is added that we are finding a problem with the profit center splitting.
Entering a two line FB60 transaction under company 0001.
Line 1 - Company 0001, profit center 220020, $100
Line 2 - Company 0002, profit center 250020, $100
SAP sends this transaction to our external tax system which returns the tax amounts to accrue for each line item.
Line 1 $7.30 for company 0001
Line 2 $9.05 for company 0002
When the transaction is then viewed in General Ledger View we see the tax amount of $7.30 posting to profit center 220020 but the tax amount for line 2 of $9.05 is evenly divided between profit centers 220020 and 250020.
The $9.05 should be posting only to profit center 250020 as the profit center assigned to line 2 of the transaction.
Thanks,
Jeff

Field Sales Ord. is a required field

HI,
While doing 412 -e movement getting this error message
Field Sales Ord. is a required field for G/L account 1000 192006

Hi,
I think the order movement you have selected must have some reference/reservation with it.
So whenever you select that particular movement, the order no. is essential.
This particularly happens for make to order production, where order is mandatory.
So just enter the order number in it, so the process gets completed.
Regards,
Siddharth.

Tax issue in US - very urgent. !!

Dear All,
Someone from SAP told me that :
"In US localisation the tax is depending
only on the delivery and good receipt location.The tax code will apply for all the item depending on the Business partner ship to address in case of a delivery and on the location of warehouse in case of goods
receipt"
However, when i ask the end user from US, he told me that in one invoice, there are items which have GST, while other items on that invoice have PST + GST. Under this situation, the tax setting cannot be "generic" based on the ship-to-address. So, could anyone share with me:
1, How to deal with this tax issue on one invoice?
2, what's the general practice in US in the tax area?
Million thanks

Have a look at this thread:
/thread/117232 [original link is broken]

Deactivate country from sales/purchase tax determination

Hello,
We are facing a typical problem in tax, We have a requiement to deactivate tax for some countries and these countries are not relevant for any sale/purchase tax. For that, we removed the country from define tax determination rules in sales & distribution->basic functions. However when we exectute the intercompany delivery, system showing the various error messages as attached in detail.
The reason we removed the countries since tax classfication view not needed in customer/material master view if the countries are not relevant for tax.
Kindly suggest.
Best Regards,
Goutham

Even if any customer or country is exempted from tax, dont hide from the respective masters.
What I would recommend is that you have a separate tax (as like exports) and assign to a combination of destination country and origin country as tax exempt, in VK11.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

VAT and sales & purchase tax

Hi,
1 In SAP, I do not see the configuration for value added tax but I only can see tax on sales/purchases. why?
2 what is the difference of vat (gst) against sales and purchase tax?
thanks
rgds

Hi ,
Dear there is no difference between VAT and sales & Purchase tax. Whenever received goods from Vendor agaisnt PO,you have received Tax Invoice against delivery challan ( That tax called as Input tax) and whenever sold goods to customer that tax called as output tax. In India most of the states using VAT oriented tax rules (it is centralized tax rules controlled by sales tax department) and remianing states using local rules (i hope) that GST.
Please visit sales tax website
Best rgds
ManiKumar

Sales Ord assignment on Prod Ord component

Experts,
I have a situation, where in a previously created MTO Sales Order had its receipts deleted & now I want to create a manual production order with the Sales Order assignment (CO08). When I add a component & try to make it Sales Ord assigned, it works fine as long as the component's material master carries a 1 or a blank indicator on the MRP 4 Ind/Coll field. If its collective, system does not accept the SO entry on the Prodn Ord.
However, when I try to create a Prod Ord (CO01), no matter what, the system does not allow me to enter a Sales Order on any component. Is it possible to influence this behavior some way?
Thanks

Andy,
?? What behavior do you seek?
CO01 creates a production order without reference to a sales order. It would make no sense to assign components to a sales order, and this is not supported.This behavior cannot be altered in standard SAP. Sales orders are irrelevant.
CO08 creates a production order with reference to a sales order. Components' assignment is dependent on the settings in the Material Master of the component. This behavior cannot be altered in standard.SAP.
What behavior do your seek?
Best regards,
DB49

Hello programs on sales and tax returns

HI ,
Can any body send sample programs of sales and tax returns of pariticular state .
i have to use bkpf and bseg tables.
thanks,
aravind.

Hi Radha
Sales Tax is what u incur on the sales u make as in on Customers - Output Tax -
Purchase tax is what u incur for ur vendors - Input Tax
CIN - is specific to Country India Version
In SAP, we first map a tax procedure to the country specifying whethere there is going to be a Jurisdiction Code or not, then we define input/output taxes in TC FTXP {in FI}; where theSD team will define a condition record mapped to an account key which they will relate to our tax code and they define condition master recd in VK11 for domestic taxes per country.
Hope this will give u a bried idea on what u wanted to knw
Rukshana

BC Major Tax Issue - Retail, Wholesale, Manual orders

Hello,
I'm hoping someone might be able to shed some light on a tax issue with BC as I'm really loosing faith with Business Catalyst over this issue!!!
We sell retail, wholesale and do manual orders.
We sell retail where the price needs to be including tax.
We sell Wholesale where the price needs to be excluding tax.
As there is no tag that will show retail price including tax and wholesale price excluding tax we were told to use {tag_totalprice} on the products page to show pricing.
To get our website to work we were told to install {tag_shippingoptions,true,,} on the shopping cart.
We were told to have tax on retail products as GST
We were then told to make tax Not applicable on wholesale products so that the tax wouldn't be included in the price but assigned with the {tag_shippingoptions,true,,} on the shopping cart.
This was all working fine until a wholesale customer rang to change their order and do another order.
if you change a manual wholesale order then it REMOVES the tax!
if a wholesale customer rings up to do an order and we can't see their password - we need to do it as a manual order as we can't login as them. Hence again no tax.
Really dissapointed in BC over this - does anyone have any solutions?
Would love any help

While GR posting sale tax issue

Hi ,
U have one issue while posting GR for Partial Qty for ex 10 qty but we are maintained sale tax 2% in PO with QTY 100 for each qty price is 4556 .
While posting GR for 10 qty sale tax is calculating for all 100 qtys .
kindly provide me the solution

Hi,
Remember that when you create a GR in WM your are now moving stock from MM to WM and depending on your storage type settings.
EG When you post GR, you first move is stock is taken from intransit to storage type 902 and from 902 to the relevant storage type ie 500 behing your doors then from there you execute putaway.
Movement of stock within storage type is done via Transfer Order.
Double check if you transfer order is fully confirmed.
Thanks,
Silas

Tax Issue in Sale order level

HI,
For the Export Customer Country "UG" but at the time of Sale order system is picked Country "IN" but the enduser didnot maintain the condition record and also it is not manual entry but it is supposed to combination of contry "UG"
but client wants only price , freight & insurance charges because he is foerigh customer i think is it requied to create seperate pricing procedure
Regards,
Prasanna
Edited by: prasanna_sap on Nov 16, 2011 1:12 PM

Hi
See SAP Note 302998 - Collecting fields for user-exit. This note says related with SD and taxes:
Sales orders and billing documents:
If there are fields you want to pass from pricing to the tax user exit that
are not in KOMP and KOMK (and the subtotal fields KOMP-KZWI1 etc. are not
enough), add those fields to the pricing user includes
It goes on:
If these pricing user exits are not enough because the values depend on
what's in XKOMV, then you can always use an alternative condition formula
for condition base value and attach it to condition type UTXJ (or UTXD, in
case of max tax pricing).
For example, fill XKOMV-KUNNR with KOMP-KUNNR if empty.
Please consider note 381348 for the case that an alternative condition
formula for condition base value is used!
I hope this helps you
Regards
Eduardo

Sales orded tax issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for