Sales Order in ATP in ECC

Hi All,
While executing Sale order in the R/3 system we are getting this message.
Error in calling up function 'BAPI_APOATP_CHECK' in APO server 'xxxx':
Exception condition "OM_ERROR" raised.
In SMQ1 in ECC -- Outbound Queue
blocked the 3 Queues for calling below functions
/SAPAPO/CIF_CBASE_INB
/SAPAPO/CIF_SHP_LOCK
/SAPAPO/CIF_SL_DOC_INBOUND
Error is Multi-level error propagation carried out.
I have transfred material, plant, Class, BOM and Work center.
Please give me the What master data need for ATP checks in Sales Order.
Please help us in this issue.
Thank you,
Durga

There could be various reasons for this error. Is your ATP check already working in simulation in APO? (TX: /sapapo/ac04). Check your logical system setup in R/3, also check the RFC destination to APO.

Similar Messages

Mass sales orders from CRM to ECC

Hi,
We have a requirement to mass upload sales orders from CRM system ECC system. I could not able to find any option to push sales orders in bulk from CRM to ECC.
Could you please let me know if you know any kind of solution for this kind of scenario.
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Kumar B.

Hi Maggie,
Thanks a lot for your response. But I could not able find CRMD_MASS_UPDATE in CRM system as well as in ECC.
Could you please let me know how to try this other please let me know the program or tcode.
Regards,
Kumar B

Does MV45AFZZ user exit trigger when CRM sales order is replicated into ECC

Hi All,
When a Sales order is created in CRM, it is replicated automatically using BDOCS from CRM into ECC.
I have requirement to code the logic during the process, when sales order is replicated into ECC.
So I need to know the BAPI which is actually triggered to create sales order in ECC, while replication takes place.
If I could atleast know, if USEREXITS in MV45AFZZ would trigger or not, when CRM order is replicated into ECC, then I could determine, If I could code my logic in those user exits.
Please help me on this.

please check this link
keremgomi=wordpress=com
Rgds
Raj

Partner Function "Vendor" missing when the sales order is replicated to ECC

Hi Gurus,
We are facing a problem on replication of functions partners between
sales order of CRM and ECC.
We have downloaded vendors (partners of table LFA1) from ECC to CRM
following note 883162 and this replication was ok!
We have mapped all partner functions from ECC to CRM and from CRM to
ECC for distribution of partners between systems.
We must include a vendor using partner function '0000092 - Carrier' on
our sales order, which is transferred to ECC. However, when the sales
order is transfered to ECC, the vendor (which was included on CRM) is
missing.
When the sales order is created on ECC and the partner (type carrier)
is included in, the order arrives on CRM missing only the partner
number, because the partner function is there.
How to fix this problem?
Best Regards,
Nivea Faria

Hi,
See this Note : 975195
Hope this helps.
Best Regards
Shiven

Does MV45AFZZ trigger when CRM sales order is replicated into ECC

Hi All,
When a Sales order is created in CRM, it is replicated automatically using BDOCS from CRM into ECC.
I have requirement to code the logic during the process, when sales order is replicated into ECC.
So I need to know the BAPI which is actually triggered to create sales order in ECC, while replication takes place.
If I could atleast know, if USEREXITS in MV45AFZZ would trigger or not, when CRM order is replicated into ECC, then I could determine, If I could code my logic in those user exits.
Please help me on this.

Hi,
I guess it should. Just put external break point (RFC userid with debuger rights) and see.
Thanks,
Nilesh P.

Partial delivery per item in sales order and ATP - schedule lines

Hi,
I've problem regarding ATP- schedule lines and partial delivery flag.
In sales order there is flag Partial delivery per item B / 1 . That means create only one delivery even with quant 0. That comes from customer master or customer info-record and it is OK.
Please look at next example.
Customer requires:
10 PCS of materail A on date X. Only 5 PCS are available on date X.
10 PCS of material B on date X 0 PCS are available on date X, 10 PCS are available on date Y.
So if we create outbound delivery on date X it will contain only 5 PCS of material A. No successive deliveries will be created for material A because of the flag B/1. That item is closed.
Problem is with material B.
The sales order will be open because of material B and on date Y we can easily create another delivery with 10 PCS of mat B.
That is wrong. Agreement with customer is only one delivery for ALL items in sales order. If we create delivery on date X it should contain only materials which are available on date X and sales order should close.
Do you know how to fix this problem?

Hi,
I've think you didn't understand my requirement. I allways get schedule lines but they are confirmed on different dates.
Example in same sales order we have:
Schedule line for item A:
DATE X confirmed quantity 10
Schedule line for an item B.
DATE X confirmed quanitity 0 (zeroe)
DATE Y confirmed quantity 10.
I would like to create outbond delivery on date X with:
item A quantity 10
item B quantity 0.
And if that hapens than B/0 rule will work or reference customzing that you suggested before. So order will be closed because all items are processed or referenced once.
Do you know how to do that?
Regards

How to see Sales order confirmed ATP date in SNP?

Dear experts,
The sales orders shown in SNP are in the time bucket corresponding to the requested date by the customer.
We would like instead to see the sales order in the time bucket corresponding to the ATP confirmed date,
do you know if this is possible?
Thanks
E

Hello Sandeep,
I suppose that the sales order you're talking about was just created in the WebClient itself? Normally a sales order is replicated to R/3 when you save it. When you save it the sales order itself becomes locked ('distribution lock'). On the sales order screen, when you press save, is the order locked (are the fields read-only)?
Normally, just saving the sales order should trigger a replication/distribution to R/3, you don't need any new buttons or anything other fancy
Regards,
Joost

Custom fields replication in sales order from CRM to ECC

Hi Experts,
We have added a few custom fields in CRM 7.0 (Ehp1) using AET. The BDoc BUS_TRANS_MSG has been automatically extended with these custom fields.
On ECC side also, same custom fields have been added to VBAK and VBAP, using APPEND STRUCTURE. Fields were added to ADDITIONAL DATA TAB B in VA01 / VA02 transactions.
Our issue is, when a sales order is created in CRM, it is getting replicated on ECC. But, only standard fields are getting replicated. The custom fields that we have added are remaining empty on ECC side.
In CRM --> txn SMW01, we can see that the BDOC is populated with custom fields also.
What is it that we have to do to ensure that custom fields are also replicated to ECC. Do we need to maintain field mapping between CRM and ECC, for custom fields, manually. How and where do we have to maintain the mapping. Also, please let me know the BADIs / exits that need to be implemented to achieve the above functionality
Regards,
Manohar

Hi Manohar
You can map these custom fields using the badi CRM_DATAEXCHG_BADI. Please see the documentation of the badi in SE18 in your system for further details.
Regards
Gavin

How can I limite some sales order Not upload to ECC

Hi expert,
I dont want some tpes sales order upload from CRM to ECC, but I want it to BW.
In my member, there is one note to get it, which mentioned to do some change in the tcode SMOEAC. Any body can give me the notes ID or tell me how to ..?
BRs
Liu Bo

Hi.
I really don't know if is there any newer note, but as far as I know no big chances occured on this transaction SMOEAC for your propose.
What I remember you have to do to change the type of replication object, is to delete everything that exists based on it. So first you have to delete the subscription, then you have to delete de publication, and only then you are able to delete and recreate the replication object type.
I remember that the system verifies if it exists any subscription not only on the client you are working but also on any other clients of your server, so you have to delete the subscription in all clients. There is sap note that describes how to verify it: 650569.
Regards.

How to make a sales order item deleted in ECC while in CRM just status changed?

Hi expert,
I have a requirment, that is:
1. the user will change the USER STATUS in a line item of sales order to "CANCEL".
2. When the order was replicated to ECC,the item should be deleted totally and the ITEM in CRM should not be affected.
How can I implement this? Is there any resolution by just make some configuration?
Thanks in advance.
Jerry

Hi Jerry,
As per standard SAP, the line item is not deleted (in ECC) based on the status changes at the line item (in CRM)
You need to do the development to achieve this. Following points to be considered if you are doing any custom enhancement.
1. What triggers the sales order replication ? Is it status change at header level ? If yes, then you need to define a program which will first check the line item status in CRM Sales Order.
2. Wherever a line item status is CANCEL, it may store in some internal table and then it will call an RFC to delete these line items in the replicated ECC Sales Order. (without deleting the line items in CRM Sales Order)
3. Mind you that, this will be a complex enhancement and may give lot of challenges in the sales order replication to ECC.
Drawback of this requirement -
1. If your client prefer to have this scenario, then it is fine, but I could see the data inconsistency in all such sales orders. There will be a mismatch between the sales order in ECC and CRM
Hope this will be useful
Thanks and Regards
DJ

Sales order rejected in ECC does not reflect in APO

Hi Friends,
We are working on ECC6 and APO7.0 for a paper mill- IS Mill functionality. We have MTO ATP with block planning and a exernal trim application. The sales order is rejected in ECC but did not reflect in APO. This has not appeared in daily CCR monitoring also. The order is trimmed, i.e planned for production. I dont see the rejection in APO table: /SAPAPO/SD_DOC Beow are the sequence of events:
-Order rejected 3/25
-Sales order 42678-20 had planned order 587645.
-Planned order 587645 is part of the enquee 4487 that was downloaded to trim on 4/4. Well after the rejection.
Please guide me if there is any way to prevent such occurences, leading to unnecessary planning, blocking of capacities.
Thanks in advance.
Arvind

Arvind,
I haven't worked with SCM when linked to IS_MILL, so I am not speaking from experience. However, I have worked with SCM and ERP Baseline, so I will be speaking from this perspective.
You didn't mention how your GATP is configured, and what planning modules you have implemented in SCM. These facts definitely can have an impact on the supply elements (planned or production orders), and what should/should not happen to these supply orders.
You also didn't mention what indicated to you that the Sales order is inconsistent between the two system. FYI just looking at tables is not a definitive method. The most important bits of information lie in LiveCache.
I don't know what is meant by "Planned order 587645 is part of the enquee 4487 ", so I will assume it is some customized interface, and I will ignore this statement for the moment.
So, I will just make a couple of suggestions as a starting point. If the sales order is actually rejected, it should not appear in R/3 MD04. Does it? If so, run program SDRQCR21 in R/3. The inconsistent order should then disappear from MD04.
If MD04 does not show the sales order (as it shouldn't), but /SAPAPO/RRP3 does show the sales order, then run program /SAPAPO/SDRQCR21 in SCM.
If neither MD04 not //RRP3 currently shows the sales order, then please tell me why you think there is a problem.
Best Regards,
DB49

Re: ATP check at storage location level in sales order.

Hi ,
I have a requirement wherein storage location is determined in my sales order, the ATP check is done at plant level as well as storage location level , and the smaller of the two quantities is taken as the result of the ATP check.
My requirement is that the ATP check should only be performed at storage location level .
Please suggest if there is any standard setting available in SAP.
iF NO , PLEASE SUGGEST SUITABLE USER EXIT, WHERE I can add my requirement.
Regards,
Nilesh

Hi Nilesh,
in SAP standard the system is always checking on plant level first and then on the storage location level, there is no possibility to change this behaviour.
I'm also not sure if the process is correct, because if you have also requirements on plant level only then you would create negative ATP if you confirm on storage location level even though there is no ATP on plant level.
I'm also not aware of a user-exit that would suite your requirement, additionally according to the IMG documentation the user-exits in the availability check area should only be carried out in agreement with SAP.
Regards,
Markus

ATP Check against customer stock for return Sale order

Hi Friends,
Pl.help in this.
1. Is it possible to configure ATP check against Customer stock in a Sale order/Return order/any other way? ( Actuallly, client wants to take back empty cylinders through return sale order by ATP check against the customer stock)
Regards,
Mani

Hi Mani ,
Are you taking cylinder as returable packing item or not?
ex- For soft drinks or beverages industry it pretty common , they use thel returnable package material type and more over why you want use return sales order for this?
Note- Just plz explain scenario to MM and PP People also as availability check with all combination
Hope it is helpful to you,
Regards
Venkat

Sales Orders Not Replicating from CRM 2007 to ECC 6.0

I have been able to successfully replicate my Customers from ECC to CRM. When attempting to replicate a Sales Order from CRM into ECC, the BDoc shows as "Confirmed (fully processed)" in SMW01. When I look at the list of receivers, it shows my ECC system, with a state of "Processed". However, when I look at the Error Segments on the BDoc, I have two events:
1. No Upload into R/3
2. R/3 Adapter is Called
Any thoughts on what I am missing?
Thanks!

MCG,
Thanks for the quick reply. Yes, I have a publication of "All Business Transactions (MESG)" with a subscription of my ECC system. The BDocs never make it into the Outbound queue. I purposely stopped the outbound queue to see if it would show-up ... it never comes in.
Thanks!

Sales Order ATP should exclude the stock of a particular st. loc

Hi,
At Sale order creation, ATP check should exclude a particular Sto Location,
Suppose we have Sto Loc 001, 002, 003, 004 & 005, we want to reserve some stock for the next year, so we identify one storage location say 005 and move some stocks to this storage location. Now when the sales people are creating Sales order, the ATP check should exculde stocks from this Storage Location (the stocks in this sto loc should not be considered in ATP).
But for all other purpose like MRP this should be visible. We want the stock to be in unrestricted area in this Sto Loc.
Request you all to propose a feasible solution either through User exit or some configuration.
Thanks in advace,
Navin

Hi All,
Thanks a lot for all the replies, I found in the storage location table T001L, a field ``DISKZ`` settings called ``Storage location MRP indicator`` the details are as follows Storage location MRP indicator
that you use to exclude storage locations from material requirements planning at plant level.
If you do not set this indicator, stock, requirements, and receipts are included in MRP at plant level.
Use
You can exclude storage locations from MRP at plant level in one of two ways:
By excluding storage location stock from MRP
If storage location stock is excluded from MRP at plant level, no receipts for this storage location will be created in the planning run.
By planning storage location stock separately
If storage location stock is planned separately, the storage location is replenished with goods if the stock falls below the reorder point.
Has any one tried this and does this meets the requirement.
Thanks in advance,
Navin Shinde

Sales Order in ATP in ECC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for