Sales order with differing order UoM and pricing UoM

Hi
I need to create a sales order where the unit of measurement for the ordered quantity differs from the unit of measurement in the pricing condition PR00. This works fine if you have a fixed conversion, because you can simply set up the conversion in the material master of the sold material. My problem is that this conversion is flexible and can be changed by the sales representative. How do I do this? I remember that this isn't a problem at all in MM-purchase orders, you simply enter the conversion in the conditions tab directly. That doesn't seem to work in sales. Any hints?
Example for spreading services for farming.
Sales order for service "spreading", order qty = 17.600 HA, price = 21.00 GBP per 1 KGH (kilogram per hectar), conversion = 17.600 HA = 723 KGH if 12.720 KG of fertilizer is spread on the field. Problem is that tonnage and the field size are changeable. As well the theoretical application rate of 723KGH can be overwritten manually as required.
thx
Bj

Make sure the quantity conversion flags are checked, and then allow manual condition processing.  This should open up the fields to allow for manual adjustment of the quantity relationship.
You will still need to maintain a default UoM ratio that will be proposed on the sales order, but that relationship will then be able to be changed at order entry time (or after save in change mode).
Bill Wood

Similar Messages

  • How to handle same product with different part numbers and pricing in SAP.

    I am a new user and want to learn if the following scenario can be handled by SAP.
    Our business buys a product from a supplier which has 2 different part numbers and prices. It is the same product. One is the primary product whilst the other is available only as an upgrade option with a different part number to a mainline product at a cheaper price .
    Our issue is that we sometimes buy the upgrade option with a mainline product to get the better price even though these go into stock. Basically we need to have the items linked with both part numbers in SAP at different prices but inventory both in and out only going against the primary part number. Any ideas?

    Thanks Jitin
    I did give them different part numbers and then attached a Bom containing the primary part number against the upgrade option however I really need to have the secondary item as a sales and purchase item but non inventory so the stock comes from the primary part. Ideally  if we receipt the goods in as the secondary number the inventory goes to the primary part. If the second number is an inventory item then I have the issue of the same part with different part numbers sitting in stock at different prices and having to rely on employees understanding the difference.
    Sorry to be so confusing. I will do some more testing over the weekend and see if I can find a suitable solution.
    Thanks
    Martin

  • Creating order with out Company code and plant - just for pricing -possible

    Hi gurus
    Just for creating sales order (let us say no delivery and no billing, client was not intrested in the initial setup) for just pricing thing, does we really need Company code and plant. with out that just with sales org setup(sale org+D.C) can I create an order to full fil the pricing scenario.
    Please I need help on this
    Thanks
    Kris

    hi kris,
            we cannot create a order with out company code and plant , due to the following reasons
          we do not require the company code to create the order , but we require the plant to create a material and use it in the sales order .and we require a company code to create a customer .
    the pricing procedure is determined depending upon the sales area(sales org+distribution channel +division).
    please reward the points if it is helpful
    Regards,
    Murali

  • Sales order with different Distribution channels

    Hi experts,
    how can i create a sales order with different distribution channels.
    I mean item level 10 = one distribution channel.
    Item level 20 = another distribution channel.
    also in Item level 30 also.... is it posible .?? how can i create ??
    because we have the material in different distribution channel in differen plant with different price ..
    Thanksin Advance,
    Anthyodaya.

    Hi Anthyodaya,
    As already answered by others, the distribution channel is only on header level(VBAK), so it is not possble to have different distribution channels in one sales order.
    Could you please consider using different division?
    Item division could be different than header.
    Go->item->Sales B->Division
    Hope it helps.
    Best regards,
    Smile

  • Single invoice for multiple orders with different divisions

    Dear All,
    while I am trying to do single invoice for muliple orders with different divisons invoice is gettting splitted..In copy control vbrk routine I  tried with 003 and 007 etc..but result is same..what configuration need to be done for getting the single invoice
    Thanks In advance
    Regards
    CNRNAIR

    Hello
    single invoice for multiple orders with "different divisions" invoice is getting split
    FYI - Different Division means different Sales Area.
    So, sales doc (whether sales order, Delivery & Billing) is applicable to EXACTLY one sales area.
    Thus, combining docs with different sales area is practically impossible.
    Provided, you are using common division.
    Hope this assist you,
    Thanks & REgards
    JP

  • How to generate SNP planned order with different category

    Our SNP system receives Forecast and Salse Order from DP system.
    and we'd like to generate SNP planned order with different category..for example, 'AI' for Forecast Demand and 'AL' for Sales Order..
    currently, If we run CTM, system generate SNP planned order with the
    same category 'AI'..
    another system(APS) in Our company receives planned order from SNP
    and they want to receive planned order for forecast and planned order for sales order seperately..

    It is not directly achievable however can be done through BADIs and two CTM profile. I am assuming that sales orders are planned ahead of Forecast demands. So have two CTM profiles - one for Sales Orders (regenerative mode) and the other for Forecast Demands (net change mode). You may have to invoke two BADIs in the first run for Sales Orders - one that changes master data by putting a temperory Forecast Horizon in SNP2 tab (BADI /sapapo/ctm_matloc). The other BADI (BADI /sapapo/ctm_orders) changes the ATP category just before saving. in the second run though you just need to run the latter BADI by saving it in the ATP category required. BADIs can be invoked based on CTM profiles used.

  • Multiple Orders with Different reasons on a Single day

    Hi,
    I am recently learning Device Management of IS-U Electricity. Now I have a problem with meter reading orders generated at the time of periodic meter reading with reason 01 and different system generated orders with reasons like 22, 21 , 16 and 11 which are the orders get created internally based on device replacement and modification.
    If the scheduled meter reading date lies on the day or the day before of device replacement or modification, the meter reading for the periodic order is getting prorated based on the meter reading entered at the time of replacement or modification. This is what I dont want.
    Is it possible to have multiple orders with different reasons on the same date? Any configuration changes are welcome.
    - Arghya

    Hi,
    You can acheive this using following config changes.
    SAP Utilities --> Device Managment -->Meter Reading --> Meter Reading Order -->Order Creation --> Define Automatic Interpolation for Meter Reading Reason.
    Uncheck  the 'Auto Interpolation' flag for Meter Reading reason 01.
    This will not use the Replacement or Modifiaction read.
    Let me know if anything more is reuiqred.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Ranjit Thakur.

  • How to fetch service order with partucular system status and user status

    Hello All,
    How to fetch service orders with specific system status and user status.
    thanks

    I want tables or views from where I can fetch service orders. I have to design ALV report based on this.
    I want to fetch released service orders with status INIT and RENT.
    Here, SYSTEM Status = Released and
             USER Status     = INIT
                                        RENT
    So is there any function module available for the same.....

  • MM INVOICE created with different Payment Terms and 2 differents PO.

    I will explain with an example to understand better the issue and why this could happen, (for the same Co.Code):
    On 05.09.2011, 5203795529 was posted with payment terms D030.
    At that time, PO #: 4501105395 was having payment terms D030 while PO #: 4501232207 was having payment term D031.
    Invoice 5203795529 was posted successfully.
    On 12.09.2011, 5203806574 was posted with payment terms D030.
    At that time, PO #: 4501105395 was having payment terms D030 while PO #: 4501232207 was having payment term D031.
    Invoice 5203795529 was posted successfully.
    In OCT, user receives another invoice for this 2 POs (4501232207 & 4501105395) and trying to post MIRO again but this time, user encountered error 'Payment terms in purchase order 4501232207 differ from current terms'. In order to proceed, user has changed payment term for 4501105395 from D030 to D031 on 17.10.2011 and proceed with invoice posting without error. 5203878342 was posted on 17.10.2011.
    The vendor always has the same Payment Term: D031
    Now the question is, why user is able to post without any problem previously even though there's different payment terms on both POs and not now anymore?.
    Thanks

    Thanks Jayavar,
    Nobody has changed anything, (I mean the PO Payment terms),  until October in PO. 4501105395
    The error message is when the user try to post with MIRO PO´s (4501232207 & 4501105395):
    "Terms of payment in purchase order 4501232207 (always with Payment term D031), differ from current terms"
    Message no. M8349
    Diagnosis:
    The terms of payment in the current invoice differ from those in the current purchase order 4501232207, other terms of payment were stipulated:
    Terms of payment key D031
    1st cash discount period 31 days 0,000%
    Either you have selected more purchase orders with different terms of payment, or you have changed the terms of payment manually.
    But the strange thing is in SEP, there's already this difference & there is no problem posting the invoice & the problem only comes when in OCT.
    Thanks and Rgs
    Francisco

  • How do I copy purchases between 2 itunes libraries on the same computer with different log ins and separate apple user ids?

    How do I copy purchases between 2 itunes libraries on the same computer with different log ins and separate apple user ids?

    Load the library which doesn't contain the songs and drag them into the open iTunes application window. If you need to move them between different computer user accounts, put them into /Users/Shared/.
    (74502)

  • Same sqlID with different  execution plan  and  Elapsed Time (s), Executions time

    Hello All,
    The AWR reports for two days  with same sqlID with different  execution plan  and  Elapsed Time (s), Executions time please help me to find out what is  reason for this change.
    Please find the below detail 17th  day my process are very slow as compare to 18th
    17th Oct                                                                                                          18th Oct
    221,808,602
    21
    2tc2d3u52rppt
    213,170,100
    72,495,618
    9c8wqzz7kyf37
    209,239,059
    71,477,888
    9c8wqzz7kyf37
    139,331,777
    1
    7b0kzmf0pfpzn
    144,813,295
    1
    0cqc3bxxd1yqy
    102,045,818
    1
    8vp1ap3af0ma5
    128,892,787
    16,673,829
    84cqfur5na6fg
    89,485,065
    1
    5kk8nd3uzkw13
    127,467,250
    16,642,939
    1uz87xssm312g
    67,520,695
    8,058,820
    a9n705a9gfb71
    104,490,582
    12,443,376
    a9n705a9gfb71
    62,627,205
    1
    ctwjy8cs6vng2
    101,677,382
    15,147,771
    3p8q3q0scmr2k
    57,965,892
    268,353
    akp7vwtyfmuas
    98,000,414
    1
    0ybdwg85v9v6m
    57,519,802
    53
    1kn9bv63xvjtc
    87,293,909
    1
    5kk8nd3uzkw13
    52,690,398
    0
    9btkg0axsk114
    77,786,274
    74
    1kn9bv63xvjtc
    34,767,882
    1,003
    bdgma0tn8ajz9
    Not only queries are different but also the number of blocks read by top 10 queries are much higher on 17th than 18th.
    The other big difference is the average read time on two days
    Tablespace IO Stats
    17th Oct
    Tablespace
    Reads
    Av Reads/s
    Av Rd(ms)
    Av Blks/Rd
    Writes
    Av Writes/s
    Buffer Waits
    Av Buf Wt(ms)
    INDUS_TRN_DATA01
    947,766
    59
    4.24
    4.86
    185,084
    11
    2,887
    6.42
    UNDOTBS2
    517,609
    32
    4.27
    1.00
    112,070
    7
    108
    11.85
    INDUS_MST_DATA01
    288,994
    18
    8.63
    8.38
    52,541
    3
    23,490
    7.45
    INDUS_TRN_INDX01
    223,581
    14
    11.50
    2.03
    59,882
    4
    533
    4.26
    TEMP
    198,936
    12
    2.77
    17.88
    11,179
    1
    732
    2.13
    INDUS_LOG_DATA01
    45,838
    3
    4.81
    14.36
    348
    0
    1
    0.00
    INDUS_TMP_DATA01
    44,020
    3
    4.41
    16.55
    244
    0
    1,587
    4.79
    SYSAUX
    19,373
    1
    19.81
    1.05
    14,489
    1
    0
    0.00
    INDUS_LOG_INDX01
    17,559
    1
    4.75
    1.96
    2,837
    0
    2
    0.00
    SYSTEM
    7,881
    0
    12.15
    1.04
    1,361
    0
    109
    7.71
    INDUS_TMP_INDX01
    1,873
    0
    11.48
    13.62
    231
    0
    0
    0.00
    INDUS_MST_INDX01
    256
    0
    13.09
    1.04
    194
    0
    2
    10.00
    UNDOTBS1
    70
    0
    1.86
    1.00
    60
    0
    0
    0.00
    STG_DATA01
    63
    0
    1.27
    1.00
    60
    0
    0
    0.00
    USERS
    63
    0
    0.32
    1.00
    60
    0
    0
    0.00
    INDUS_LOB_DATA01
    62
    0
    0.32
    1.00
    60
    0
    0
    0.00
    TS_AUDIT
    62
    0
    0.48
    1.00
    60
    0
    0
    0.00
    18th Oct
    Tablespace
    Reads
    Av Reads/s
    Av Rd(ms)
    Av Blks/Rd
    Writes
    Av Writes/s
    Buffer Waits
    Av Buf Wt(ms)
    INDUS_TRN_DATA01
    980,283
    91
    1.40
    4.74

    The AWR reports for two days  with same sqlID with different  execution plan  and  Elapsed Time (s), Executions time please help me to find out what is  reason for this change.
    Please find the below detail 17th  day my process are very slow as compare to 18th
    You wrote with different  execution plan, I  think, you saw plans. It is very difficult, you get old plan.
    I think Execution plans is not changed in  different days, if you not added index  or ...
    What say ADDM report about this script?
    As you know, It is normally, different Elapsed Time for same statement in different  day.
    It is depend your database workload.
    It think you must use SQL Access and SQl Tuning advisor for this script.
    You can get solution for slow running problem.
    Regards
    Mahir M. Quluzade

  • UOM and Alternative UOM

    Hi All,
      Please clarify this, is the UOM is based on Material type if it is then we have to find UOM and alternative UOM based on material type.
    Regards,
    Babu

    UOM is the base unit of measure which exists in Basic view of material. This is the least possible unit defined for a material. FOr example Piece PC or ST
    Alternative unit of measures are the other unit of measures used in different views of material master. Issue unit, order unit or Sales unit....We have to maintain the conversion of these Alternate UOM's and Uom's in MM01 or MM02. Material UOM's are stored in MARM table.
    Alternate UOM could be BAG or PAC or CS (case)...
    Conversions are like BAG = 10 PC where PC is the base unit of measure and BAG is the alternate unit of measure.
    -Kriss

  • Sales order with reference to Contract and another sales order

    Hi Gurus,
    I would like your suggestions on one of the business requirement i have.
    We are creating a new EDI interface with few of our customers to create sales orders. While creating sales orders, it should validate if there are any open contracts available and if yes, then the sales order should be created with reference to it. so far good but there are chances that sold to party on the contract could be different from sold to party on the EDI order sent by customer (customer can have more than one sold to party on their system). IDOC's are failing in this scenario and not able to create a sales order since sold to partys are not matching. I need your help.
    Can we do some thing in customer master to handle this scenario?
    or
    Create a new sales doc type (YEDI or some thing) and create sales order from IDOC without reference to contract. Business will look into all YEDI order and create the actual sales order out of it but the challenge here is i cannot refer contract to the actual sales order or YEDI order.
    Is it possible to create sales order with ref to a contract and another sales order?
    Please help
    Thanks
    Venkat

    Hello Venkat
    What is the linkage between sold to party of contract and sold to party of order..If customer has more than one sold to party.
    Why don't you use customer hierarchy....link all sold to party of a customer to hierarchy node.for example...you create a hierarchy  node 1000 and assigned customers 2000 and 3000 to it.you have contract for 2000..so when you create a sales order for 3000 check in knvh table it's customer hierarchy 1000 and get all sold tos assigned to hierarchy...which is 2000....check if contract exist for sold to's..If yes then create order with reference.
    Let us know if it works for you.
    Thanks
    Amit Gupta

  • Sales order with different divsions...

    Dear All,
    I am creating a sales order with one sales area (1000-01-01),  materials are 3 different divisions (01.02.03), but in all SIS reports system is updating with only one division i.e 01. But, I want to know the sales report for all the divisions.
    What all are the settings need to be done.
    Note: I tried by using common division also (00), but facing the same problem.
    Could any one plz suggest me.
    Regards,
    Ramu

    Hi
    If the header division and item division are different the system can react in various ways
    If you make some entry in check division in VOV8 depending on the control that you have set the system will react
    Assuming that if you maintain check division in VOV8 BLANK and if the item division is ticked the system will not accept your order as the header div and item div differs
    Assuming that if you maintain check division in VOV8 BLANK and if the item division is not ticked Then you should have a SH defined in the material divisions sales area
    E.g
    1000,10,01 say this is ordering sales area customer is X
    Say three materials A in Div 01,B in div 02 and C in div 03
    Now your order for material A is no problem as the header div and item div are same both 01 and 01
    Now your order for material B then there is problem as the header div 01 and item div 02 differs
    In this case if you want to save the order then there should be a ship to party in sales area 1000,10,02 who is assigned to this customer X (SP) in the sales area 1000,10,01 or alternatively you have to extend this customer X who is in sales area 1000,10,01 to sales area 1000,10,02 also in XD01
    Same is the case for material C
    To do smooth processing of your sales order check div should be BLANK in VOV8
    Item div not to be ticked in VOV8
    CMR should be extended to all sales areas
    It is better to leave item div unticked and check div blank then the header div and item div are allowed to vary in sales orders and remember to tick business data at item category so that at item level also bothe can vary
    Common div will not work in your case as it will not check the MMR as the division is a field in MMR not an organizational unt
    In VOR2 itself you can see it is for conditions and customers only
    The same is the qn of Mr.Pankaj a few days back and i remember your post regarding my answer
    What is exactly the problem you have?
    Regards
    Raja

  • Transfer posting to special stock sales order with different material

    I am able to MB1B a material  (Transfer posting) using mvt 412 E and transfer from own stock to sales order stock ,where Sales order belongs to a different material.
    It should not allow posting to a "E" stock to a sales order of different material. (anyway system allows that without any warning/error?)
    MB1B:Only stock type change (within same storage location).

    Hi ,
    I tried replicating your Query and observed it as a standard Behaviour
    When you use 412 E  for posting stock to sales order , system is not validating whether the Material is available in Sales order or
    Material Check is only happening against the Plant and storage location but not at sales order level
    if you want the check to happen, may be you can try to put a code in this Include
    MGV_MATNR_LAMA_SAPLMATL which will Read the Material
    regards,
    santosh

Maybe you are looking for