SAP - Vertex Tax Distribution / Not Invoice?
Hello, when we are processing certain sales orders, Vertex is interpreting these as Tax Distribution business transaction, rather than Invoice transactions. When we invoice single line item orders, we get an Invoice business transaction type. However, on multi line orders we get a Tax Distribution type. These are custom order types for taxable orders. Based on the Vertex install guides, it looks like SAP is calling RFC_UPDATE_TAXES_DOC for the Invoice schema, however it looks like SAP is calling RFC_FORCE_TAXES_DOC for the Tax Distribution Schema. Any reason why the "FORCE_TAXES" RFC would be called? Thanks for any insights...
Paul,
I read your problem and most likely there is addtional configuration that may need to change depending on the details of your SAP and Vertex deployment. You can reach me at Vertex to discuss this issue. Some addtional details about which version of SAP, which product and version from Vertex, how it is deployed, etc will be some of the items we can discuss. As an example, this could be a memory issue and you need to enable more listeners....sometimes this happens when the RFC gateway can't keep with the responses from the external system. Kevin Toner
Similar Messages
-
Vertex tax information does not come back to SAP
Strange problem that we are having.
We have a situation where the taxes calculated back from Vertex somehow does not come back to the billing document upon billing document creation. However, this problem seems to be rare and intermittent, but happens regardless.
The problem doesn't seem to be configuration because billing documents for the same customer and material are successfully calculated for tax. Also, if the incorrect billing document is re-billed, the taxes come in correctly. I already checked VK13 to make sure that all the condition types are coming in correctly.
Also, Vertex seems to have been able to receive the parameters that is used for calculating the tax as the Vertex log shows that the tax information was calculated correctly, but for some reason, this tax does not make it back to the billing doc.
Has anybody had this problem with Vertex?
ThanksPaul,
I read your problem and most likely there is addtional configuration that may need to change depending on the details of your SAP and Vertex deployment. You can reach me at Vertex to discuss this issue. Some addtional details about which version of SAP, which product and version from Vertex, how it is deployed, etc will be some of the items we can discuss. As an example, this could be a memory issue and you need to enable more listeners....sometimes this happens when the RFC gateway can't keep with the responses from the external system. Kevin Toner -
Subject:-Tax reduction in invoice is not possible at the time of LIV when c
Dear SAP expert
Subject:-Tax reduction in invoice is not possible at the time of LIV when corresponding order is closed.
While carrying out the LIV of vendor invoice against service entry sheet , ERROR message of Order xxxxxxx created in PM module is closed. Main reasons for the same is Service tax at time of service entry sheet is 12% and at the time of invoice verification it is 3.96% and reduced tax amount is credited to order. Which we can say is restricted as after Order closure cost cannot be changed on order.
Is there any solution available?
s apHi,
In response to your requirement:
let me clear my business scenario...
total price of po is usd100 and sales tax is 20%.
system calculate sales tax separate the reason being the codition type for sales tax is statistical.
is it possible that the value of sales tax included in the PO net price but not calculate at the time of GR.
Regards,
Ali
This is very much possible. Include your tax condition type in the calculation of net price and make this tax as deductible.Donot assign NVV key to it.
Also donot make it statistical as you want to include it in the net price calculation.
Thanks,
Atal -
An unique tax distribution line in one AP invoice in R12
Dear my friends,
Could you tell me if it is possible to generate only one unique summarized tax distribution line for all item-type lines in AP invoice in R12?
Now, we found, after calculating tax, the system generate tax distribution lines for item-type lines one by one.
Thank you in advantage.
Best regards,
NingHi Ning:
Please check if 'enforce tax from reference doc' flag at the configuration owner tax options is checked. If this flag is checked, the tax would always be enforced from the PO, and overrides will not be considered.
Uncheck this flag and try overriding tax lines after matching.
Hope this helps !!
Tarun -
Override calculated tax distribution account in PO-matched R12 AP invoice
Hi my friends,
Can you tell me whether it is possible to override the calculated tax distribution account in PO-matched AP invoice in R12 version? Is there any options to control it?
We found we can override the calculated tax distribution account in normal AP invoice in R12. But we can't do that for PO-matched AP invoice in R12, while we can do that in 11i.
Thank you in advantage.
Best regards,
NingHi Ning:
Please check if 'enforce tax from reference doc' flag at the configuration owner tax options is checked. If this flag is checked, the tax would always be enforced from the PO, and overrides will not be considered.
Uncheck this flag and try overriding tax lines after matching.
Hope this helps !!
Tarun -
Idoc INVOIC - error Tax entry not possible in this item - Message no. FF724
Hello,
I have an idoc in error with the following error message.
In the idoc type INVOIC
Segment E1EDK04:
MWSKZ N1 VAT indicator
MSATZ 19.000 VAT rate
MWSBT 20.52 Value added tax amount
In OBCD
Partn.Type PartnerNo Tax type Tax rate Cty Tx
LI FNISL N1 19.000 V2
Input tax N6 is defined in the system with rate 19.000%
Direction 2 Inbox
Current status 51
Basic type INVOIC01
Extension
Message type INVOIC
Partner No. FNISL
Partn.Type LI
Tax entry not possible in this item
Message no. FF724
Diagnosis
You can not enter a tax amount in this item since, due to the posting amount entered and the tax code, a total tax amount of zero has been calculated.
This could either be due to the fact that the tax code has been defined with a value of 0%, or because the posting amount entered (that is, the tax base) is too small.
Example:
With a tax rate of 15%, a tax amount greater than zero will only be achieved with a base amount greater than 0.04. With values of 0.03 and less, it is therefore not possible to enter a tax amount.
Procedure
Only enter tax amounts in conjunction with tax codes for which a percentage rate not equal to zero has been defined. Make sure that in documents with several G/L account items you enter the total tax amount in an item with a sufficiently high posting amount.
do you have an idea to solve it?
Regards
ArnaudMessage no. FF724
Check note 681538
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi -
While doing invoice verification, for fright value tax code not appearing
Hi All,
While doing invoice verification for PO which is having fright conditon, system is not displaying tax code in invoice.
Every time user has to select manually in the invoive verification.
Is there is any config missing for that fright condition?
Thanks in Advance.
AnilHi
If you wish to default the tax code for the planned delivery costs this
must be obtained from an independent source which is OMR2.
With OMR2 it is possible to default the tax in the delivery cost
line + header tax. It is not possible to default only in the delivery
cost line. The header tax needs to be changed manually to support the
different tax codes in the item lines.
Best regards
Erika -
Withholding tax @ time of Invoice not available in DMEE struture table
Hello DMEE Experts:
facing some issue in DMEE
I need to capture withholding tax amount @ time of Invoice in DMEE output as far as my knowldge invoice level details doesn’t get copied to DMEE structure table (FPAYHX, FPAYH and FPAYP).
Expected DMEE output:
Indicator
Payment document
BLNR
Gross BLNR amount
Withholding tax amount
Net amount
D
200000006
0010078629
I
200000006
1600000029
1000
8.93
991.07
I
200000006
1600000030
1500
13.39
1486.61
I
200000006
4600006397
650777
650777
I
200000006
4600006398
650777
650777
I
200000006
4600006407
650777
650777
T
1600000029
39
0
0
893
T
1600000030
39
0
0
1339
as per above expected output every invoice applicable for withholding tax @ time of invoice same is get repeated in tax line item (T) i.e next level
I am new to DMEE can anybody help me how to meet this requirement specially how i can arrange level so that all respective invoice get repeated which fall under single payment document.
Some more input
D line items for Vendor Payment line items details
I Invoice level details like BLNRS
T Line stand for tax line item on respective invoice
Thanks
PankajHello Exper,
can anybody help on this, i need to deliver this DMEE tree ASAP
Thanks
Pankaj -
Report to check Taxes before posting invoice to accounting..
Hi All,
Could you please help me if there are any report to see the taxes before the invoices are posting to accounting?
If we dont have it in invoice level then its ok if we can check the taxes at sales order level.
In sales order i undestand we can check in VBAK-Doc Condition field pull the sales order to KONV to enter the Doc condition # that shows all the condition types and values.
However, this does not show the sales order number and it wont be helpful at user level.
Hope there should be some standard report for this function and seeking help here.
Thanks in advance
Best Regards,
RamHi Ram
Instead of letting users report on taxes, rather tighten up on controls within SAP:
1. Make tax condition types mandatory in the pricing procedure(s)
2. Configure the tax condition types such that only automatically determined values are allowed
3. Ensure that you have tax condition records to deal with all eventualities (including zero value condition records).
HTH
James -
FI-AP Tax Code not considering the excise duty while calcuating the VAT
Sub: A/P Tax Code not considering the excise duty while calcuating the VAT
Hi Frnds.
I have a typical problem.
Till now we are using a "W6" as a tax code, where Excise-10%, Ed Cess-2%, SEd Cess-1% and VAT-4%.
But as the Govt. rules changed I have created a new tax code "W8" by copying the W6 and modified the VAT to 5% by changing the condition record JVRD.
The new tax code is not calculating VAT part correctly. It is taxing into consideration Invoice Base value, Ed Cess & SEd Cess (Omiting the Excise Duty).
I have checked my Tax Procedure, there everything is fine. Even my old tax code "W6" is working correctly.
Let me know where the error lies.
Here is the scenario
00. Tax code - W6 - W8 - Current Staus of W8
01. Invoice Base - 355181 - 351798 - 353324 (by SAP Document Simulation View)
02. Excise @ 10% on 01. - 35518 - 35180 - 35332
03. Ed Cess @ 2% on 01. - 710 - 704 - 707
04. SEd Cess @ 1% on 01. - 355 - 352 - 353
05. VAT @ 4% on (010203+04) - 15671 - 0 - 0
05. VAT @ 5% on (010203+04) - 0 - 19401 - 0
05. VAT @ 5% on (010304) - 0 - 0 - 17719
INVOICE TOTAL VALUE - 407435 - 407435 - 407435
Pls. let me know how to come over the issue.
By the way I am using the above tax code at FB60 transaction code.
Regards
Krishna
Edited by: Gopi Krishna Gutti on Oct 17, 2011 10:18 AMHi Vivek
Acutually we planned to implement SAP - FI & MM Modules only, and all the configuration is done in the system, but at the final stage our management is not satisfied with MM area, so finally we have gone live with only FI Moudle.
By the way thankyou for the reply. I have maintained 100% in JMX1 for the new tax code and it is working fine.
I will give you full points.
Once again thanks a lot.
Regards
Krishna -
Handling withholding taxes for each invoices in DMEE
Hi,
I am doing DMEE(out going flat file) for argentina.
I need to dispaly alll wihthold taxes for each invoices.
Can any one know how to Process multiple line item in DMEE tree.
Here i am using Exit function.
I got all withholding items one table ,But how to i dispaly these item for each invoices.
This should look like this.
Header
Item1
Item2
Withhod tax1
withhold tax1
item1
item2
Withhod tax1
withhold tax1
Withhod tax3
Thanks,
Bala
Edited by: bala chandran on Dec 29, 2009 1:45 PM
Edited by: bala chandran on Dec 30, 2009 11:27 AM
Edited by: bala chandran on Jan 4, 2010 8:56 AMHi,
check this OSS Note:
https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1286713
Best regards. -
Witholding tax in Sales invoice
Hi All,
Just want to ask how to set up automatic computation of witholding tax in Sales invoice created in Sales & Distribution module. We already set up all necessary configuration in FI and customer master data. During postings in TCode FB75, the witholding tax automatically post in the transaction entry.
But during SD transaction, there is an automatical computation of witholding tax but the amount is zero and the witholding code is blank.
Hope to hear from you soon. Thanks.Hello,
The determination of the withholding tax in the order is correct,
because there are only the condition base value is display, but not
the condition value.
This systembehaviour is absolutely correct, because the withholding
tax is only now active in FI.
Therefore this condition type is only displayed in SD without values.
For the determination of the withholding tax a table with the data
of the withholding taxes is build. (taccit_wt)
Therefore you need the customizing settings from FI and it is not possible to determine the values in the SD documents.
Regards
Claudia
If you are satisfied with the answer, please give Reward Points -
Final input tax distribution VS Preliminary input tax distribution
Hello all,
i just have just two small question:
1) Is it possible to just do "Preliminary" input tax distributions and never do a "Final" input tax distribution?
Is there any reason why this should not be done?
2) Does a Tax Adjustment only make sense if i have done a "Final" input tax distribution on a Invoice?
I would appreciate any help
Regards
MaurizioHi Maurizio,
1) As far as I know the only difference between the prelimanary and final run is that the final run, blocks the option rate % for that period.
2) I suppose so, since the input tax correction should only be done when the option rate % in final
regards
stefaan -
COBRA - FSA in Enrollment, but not Invoices
Employees can elect Spending Accounts on COBRA election forms, but Spending Accounts don't appear on the COBRA Invoices. I can't find any logic in the Invoices program (RPUCOB08) that uses FSA data (infotype 0671). Has anyone else had this problem?
Hi,
1.- in the documentation of this badi it says:
An active implementation of this Business Add-In means that you cannot manually enter the withholding tax base and amount. You define the settings for their calculation in Customizing for Financial Accounting in the following activity: Define Withholding Tax Type for Invoice Posting.
2.- it is very important at the end of this badi to do this:
te_rbws[] = i_rbkpv-h_rbws[].
te_rbvs[] = i_rbkpv-h_rbvs[].
check this OSS Note (Note 1286713 - MIRO: Enhanced withholding tax is not calculated):
https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1286713
Best regards
Edited by: Pablo Casamayor on Mar 23, 2010 3:28 PM -
Disable Vertex Tax Jurisdiction Code Validation & RFC Call
We want to disable calling vertex for tax jurisdiction code in some cases based on sales org & division. For a small business unit we are using SAP ECC 5.0 SD module to create customers & sales orders. These orders are placed via a external non-SAP front-end and are entered into SAP via a BAPI/RFC create customer & create sales order call. The front-end calculates all the prices and tax and passes that to SAP via the BAPI call. SAP accepts the prices & tax as-is (due to how we've configured SAP for these types of orders) and does not recalculate price or tax. However, on SAP we have external tax configured to call Vertex Q Series via Translink which we currently use to determine jurisdiction code & sales tax for other business units & for use tax. This external non-SAP front-end does not have any address validation therefore the addresses we receive are not always good (ex. they abbreviate or mis-spell cities, etc...) and therefore when saving customer or order addresses via the BAPI calls we receive errors from SAP indicating that the tax jurisdiction code can not be determined. In these cases we want to NOT call Vertex for automatic tax jurisdiction code check and allow SAP to accept a state level jurisdiction code that we can pass (ex. Minnesota's is 2400000000). How can we turn off the call to Vertex for tax jurisdiction code check? Apparently we can use SAP user exit EXIT_SAPLFYTX_USER_001 include ZXFYTU03 but what is the ABAP code to turn this call off for specific sales org & division?
Regards,
JeffHi,
You can create the custom tables with the same fields on Vertex and maintain those tables with the same values.
You can comment the section of RFC call and add your own validations.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Kranthi
Maybe you are looking for
-
Searching with different character sets
Hello, we have a problem with Intermedia 8.1.6. running on Solaris. The table contains the text with different character sets and that's the problem. User submits the query in his char.set and the IM sometimes doesn't find the data. Idea is to create
-
I have a MacBook Pro and a HDMI cable which once did work, but no longer. Did software change, did my luck run out? What can I do to make HDMI cable work again?
-
I completed and ordered a hardcover photo book, Now I would like to order the same book but with a soft cover or wire bound cover. IPhoto doesn't seem to have a feature which just lets me change the completed book to another type of cover.
-
Document on XML support in Oracle 8i
Hi. I am looking for a brief document about Oracle 8i's support of XML. I am aware of the whole book on XML under Online Documentation, but want a more concise one. Could anyone help? Regards, Rahul
-
How to find out how many 802.11b clients are connecting
Hello We got around 70 Cisco AP1231 here in autonomous function. They're all equiped with 802.11b/g modules. I'd like to soon disable 802.11b here (school), but I should somehow find out how many people are still using 802.11b. Any ideas how I could