/SAPAPO/CIF_IRQ_REDUCT_INBOUND queue is found in ecc for sales order ?

Hi all,
i can find this queue "/SAPAPO/CIF_IRQ_REDUCT_INBOUND on outbound queue which is strange and which has caused to stop the standard mcex_update_11_qrfc queue to be stopped!!
Can anyone pls explain me when this queue is been used in the apo and for what purposes and how it gets triggered!!
Thanks

Hi,
but the queue is found in the ecc and it caused to stopped executing the daily extraction queue for sales order?
thanks

Similar Messages

  • Influence /SAPAPO/SJKTST04  for sales order

    Dear SAP Gurus,
    We are using report /SAPAPO/SJKTST04 to generate sales orders in simulation version but we would like to disconsider ou consider a different shipping calendar in the location master. Our shipping calendar is blocked until the 6th day of the month but we would like to have the sales orders created since 1st day.
    We could influence the DP release to SNP using the BADI /SAPAPO/SDP_RELDATA.
    Do you know if is possible to influence the calendar of the sales order creation using report /SAPAPO/SJKTST04?
    Thanks
    Mauricio

    Hi,
    but the queue is found in the ecc and it caused to stopped executing the daily extraction queue for sales order?
    thanks

  • Requisitions for sale order stock

    Requisitions for sale order stock that are generated directly from the
    sales order are not passed to SRM but requisitions that are created
    manually for sales order stock are passed to SRM.
    Why is the sourcing of a requisition for sales order stock where the
    requisition was created directly from the sales order not supported?

    Hi,
    We need same requirement, we found only PR's with item category "5"(Third party ) created from sales are transfered to SRM.( It is hard coaded in ECC).
    Let us know if you are able to resolve your issue.
    Thank you
    Sreedhar Vetcha

  • User exit for  Sales order

    hi,
       i need to eliminate leading zeros for PO number which comes in SO created trough ALE.i found the enhancement for the FM idoc_input_orders.in that enahancement we have 12 FM's.my Leading zeros are comming for field belnr which comes in e1edk01 segment of idoc orders05.now i had coded my part of coding in FM exit_saplved.._oo1 and i had activated that.but it is not working for me.than i tought of going to other FM exit_sapl..._009.in which i'm not able go into the include either.plz help me out.thank you.

    Hi, Krishna!
    With IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS during IDoc interpretation PO number is assigned to XVBAK-BSTKD field which is later used for sales order creation with reference to PO.
    So all you need is to use some customer exit with changing parameters containing XVBAK after IDoc interpretation is completed. For example you can use EXIT_SAPLVEDA_009 which is called at the end of IDoc check after interpretation.
    Regards,
    Maxim.

  • RBA GATP check is not getting invoked for Sales Order

    Hi Everyone,
    RBA GATP check is not getting invoked for Sales order.
    I maintained the configuration settings for 'Rules-Based Availability Check', APO general settings (check mode, check instruction), carried out integrated rule maintenance, Rule determination for the combination of order type & product, associated the check mode to product master. Also maintained all the settings in ECC towards Req class, Req type, checking control etc.
    However, sales order is not invoking RBA Check though it is showing up the 'Rule' icon in the screen. Also, in the APO Availability check in Sales order when I click onto 'check instruction', I get the checking mode that pertains to RBA for business event 'A' (Sales order). Though I have not maintained any stock for the main material for which I have the sales order, yet system is confirming any quantity that I put in.
    I would expect that system would propose the same material in an alternate location where we have stock through RBA.
    Request you to share ideas on this.
    Regards,
    Avijit Dutta

    Hi Avijit,
    You should used No Checking Horizon in Checking instructions and also Check your rule control settings.
    What you have defined in 1st and 2nd steps. Check whether product substitution is carried out or Location Substitution.
    Thanks,
    Bala.

  • Dynamic Credit Checks - Different Horizon for Sales Order & Delivery

    Hi Experts ,
    had a query . I am testing a scenario for Dynamic credit Check where the Horizon is ZERO for Sales Order & 3 Months Horizon for deliveries. How should the system behave in such a case. What would be the best way to test whether system behaviour is ok as per this expectations.
    Also I would like to know whether "0" horizon for sales order means that system looks into the entiire list of open sales orders or  the horizon of check is only upto the end of the current month . In FD32 the curent date is indiacted as the horizon date. While creating sales orders today I found dynamic block for 0 horizon is only working for sales orders with availabilty date upto 7th July '10 which neither covers the existing month-June & neither full of July. Beyond that there is no dynamic block soccuring.That made me a bit confused .
    Please advice with you valuable inputs.
    Thanking You.

    Hello Sai ,
    thank you for the response. Had already checked note . But this does not speak about the implication "0" M horizon of dynamic credit check . What is coverage for that ?

  • Error reading material cost estimate for sales order (KE292)

    Dear All,
    I have an issue with billing. we are posting july month transactions, the material cost is maintained through MR21. When releasing billing document for accounting we are getting error message like"Error reading the material cost estimate for sales order "11"
    Message no. KE292
    Diagnosis
    In Profitability Analysis (CO-PA), the system tried to valuate item 000010 of sales order 11 by reading the corresponding product cost estimate.
    However, no product cost estimate could be found for this sales order item.
    The system accessed product costing for product AMLFP011011XX00P using costing key YB3 as defined in the
    CO-PA Customizing settings.
    System Response
    The system cannot process the document any further.
    Procedure
    Check your Customizing settings."
    We cross checked with other client as a current date and we ran cost estimate through CK40N with same material. and we posted entries. Here it is working fine. but in above process it is not working. Can you pls guide me where i missed.
    Regards,
    Nagaraju,

    Hi,
    When the Costing Key is assigned to the material types in the COPA customizing, then system expects Cost estimation when billing is released to Accounts.
    If you dont run cost estimation but update the material master through MR21, system will not accept as in the Costing key configuration you must have selected the Current Standard price field for the valuation.
    Hence, try to run cost estimation and then do releasing.
    Thanks & Regards
    Ravi Kumar

  • How to see archive data for Sales order

    Hi all,
            I am working on PS , network is created with sales order 10911. the components are added while sales order created, but after that someone deletes the sales order, because now it is showing oder does not found, where i get the entreis for sales order.
    Regards,
    Khushi.

    Hi Khushi,
    To see the archived data for sales order , go to transaction code SARA.
    Choose object name as SD_VBAK.Click READ.
    It will show a screen giving a name of program and option to execute in background or foreground.
    It will help you to get information about archived sales order data.
    Hope it helps you.
    Thanks,
    Sarita singh Rathour
    Edited by: Sarita Rathour on Aug 28, 2009 7:46 AM

  • How to configure rescheduling for sale order quantities

    kindly explain how to configure rescheduling for sale order quantities that are created last month. kindly explain. i am in urgent.
    regards,
    g.v.shivakkumar

    Hi,
    Short text
    Rescheduling sales and stock transfer documents: by material
    Description
    The 'Rescheduling' program (SDV03V02) processes sales document items that are contained in the item directory for the material. It takes into consideration open items and schedule lines from stock transfer items, stock transfer scheduling agreements and purchase order requests (items only), referred to hereafter as stock transfer documents, for the materials.
    All sales documents for the material that are still open are selected. This means that the material index must be activated for at least all sales document types, whose items may have requirements. All stock transfer documents or items for the material that are still open are also selected. Open in this case means for example, that there is no deletion indicator, that the item from a stock transfer purchase order request cannot be labeled as completed or that the quantity delivered and posted to goods issue for the item in a stock transfer purchase order is the same as the amount ordered. An availability check can only be carried out if a checking rule is assigned to the document type - if this is not the case, the document or document item is not checked.
    Checking rule 'A' is used as a basis for rescheduling sales orders (exceptions to this are rush orders  they use checking rule B, and orders with individual customer stock; they use checking rule AE). Stock transfer documents use the checking rule that is assigned in Customizing for Purchasing. It is important that the scope of checks is consistent for both the stock transfer documents and the sales documents and that they do not exclude each other, as this can lead to incorrect test results. An example of an incorrect setting would be: The scope of check for checking rule 'A' checks delivery schedules for stock transfer purchase orders and stock transfer purchase requests, however the scope of check for the checking rule for the stock transport scheduling agreement does not.
    The items and schedule lines found in the selection are sorted according to 'Priorities' - document category, delivery priority, creation date of the item or schedule line (for stock transfer purchase orders and delivery plans) entered on the selection screen or according to the schedule line date of the earliest schedule line with order quantity, document number and item number and then transferred to the availability check. Priority 1 is highest priority and priority 5 the lowest. Stock transfer purchase order requests are sorted after stock transfer purchase orders and scheduling agreements, as they are less binding. This means that when you have identical sort criteria such as delivery dates, the stock transfer purchase order item is checked first and then the item from the stock transfer purchase order request.
    The preset option 'Unconfirmed documents required' only carries out rescheduling for materials for which there is at least one unconfirmed transaction.
    You can use the parameters 'Sorting criteria delivery date' to define whether sorting is carried out with the order quantity after the creation date of the item or the delivery date of the earliest schedule line.
    If you mark the 'Simulation' field, the checked documents are not saved. Instead a results list is generated and saved. However, the availability check for the corresponding documents continues as if saving has taken place already, that is, that the simulated list corresponds to the actual one.
    Under 'Options' on the selection screen, specify whether sales documents and/or stock transfer documents should be processed. For stock transfer documents you can enter whether stock transfer purchase orders and scheduling agreements should be processed at item or schedule line level:
    Processing at item level:
    All open schedule lines for the item are read and collected, then transferred to the availability check. To sort and prioritize documents, you do not need each individual schedule line. It is sufficient to have the item or data from the first schedule line. All open schedule lines for the item are processed and checked.
    Example of processing at item level:
    Sorting: Date (Delivery date first schedule line) - Document number - Document item
    Doc. cat. Doc. number  Doc. item  Doc. schedule line  Delivery date PO        4500000012      10               0001              26.01. PO        4500000012      10               0002              26.02. PO        4500000025      20               0001              28.01. PO        4500000025      20               0002              02.02.
    You can see that the second schedule line for document 4500000025/20 from 02.02 was processed after the second schedule line for document 4500000012/10 from 26.02. This is because all open schedule lines for an item are read and processed. The first schedule line from 4500000012/10 has the earliest delivery date, therefore it has priority.
    Processing at schedule line level:
    Each open schedule line for an item is entered in document sorting in accordance with the values entered under 'Priorities'. The availability check is carried out for each individual schedule line.
    Example for processing at schedule line level:
    Sorting: Date (delivery date first schedule line) - document number -document item
    Doc. cat.    Doc. number  Doc. item  Doc. sched. line  Del. date PO           4500000012    10             0001           26.01. PO           4500000025    20             0001           28.01. PO           4500000025    20             0002           02.02. PO           4500000012    10             0002           26.02.
    Here you can see that each schedule line was sorted according to its delivery date. Note that this type of processing requires more runtime due to the individual checks and more frequent saving.
    The results of rescheduling are saved, as long as the program was not started in simulation mode. When calling up from the 'Sales' area menu or when directly starting via the development environment, the iniator is informed via a dialog box that he has just started a process that changes data. He can then decide whether or not he wants to continue.
    Checking procedure for stock transfer documents:
    An availability check of stock transfer documents in rescheduling is carried out in accordance with the check carried out when manually creating a document. If, however, the required quantity for a schedule line is not available on a particular date and will not be ready until later, new schedule lines are created for the stock transfer purchase orders and scheduling agreements, containing the relevant data. New items are created in this case for stock transfer purchase order requirements. The total sum of schedule line quantities for a processed schedule line corresponds to the schedule line quantity of the original schedule line.
    First example: Using a stock transfer purchase order item with a schedule line:
    a) Status of item before rescheduling run:
    Del. date  PO quantity   Confirmed quant  Confirmed del. date 23.07.      50 items       0 items              -
    ==> This now affects the stock/requirement situation:
        - Goods issue is posted for the material in the delivering plant on the 23.07.
        - A purchase order of 10 items was created for the material in the delivering plant. Delivery is expected on the 29.07.
    b) Status of stock transfer purchase order item after rescheduling run:
    Del. date PO quantity   Confirmed quant   Confirmed del. date 23.07.     40 items      40 items            23.07. 29.07.     10 items      10 items            29.07.
    ==> The first schedule line was changed in accordance with the results of the rescheduling availability check. Only 40 of the 50 original items could be delivered on the 23.07. Therefore, a new schedule line is created for the rest on the 29.07. for 10 confirmed items.
    Second example: Same output situation as the above example.
    ==> There is now a change in the requirement/stock situation:
    A purchase order for 10 items is created for the material in the delivering plant. Delivery is expected on the 29.07. A further purchase shows another 40 planned items on the 30.07.
       Status of stock transfer purchase order item after rescheduling run:
    Del. date PO quantity  Confirmed quant  Confirmed del. date 29.07.     10 items       10 items          29.07. 30.07.     40 items       40 items          30.07.
    ==> The first schedule line was changed in accordance with the result of the availability check for rescheduling. The original delivery date is set to the date confirmed in the ATP check. A new schedule line is created for the remaining 40 items, that are available on the 30.07.
    Note:
    Any set fixed delivery date and quantity indicators and creation indicators for schedule lines or items are 'inherited' by newly created schedule lines. Assuming that the original schedule line was fixed in the above example (since it is created manually), this indicator is also set for the newly created schedule line.
    If shipping scheduling is activated for a stock transfer document type, this is also implemented for newly created schedule lines, with the exception of route schedule determination. This means that in the current version of the program no route schedule has been determined for a schedule line containing a route schedule for which new schedule lines may need to be created.
    The results of the run are issued in the form of a list, which is also saved, so that the results can be controlled at a later date. This is done using the function 'Evaluate rescheduling', but it is only a good idea to do this after the first rescheduling has taken place. You can restrict selection requirements but these can however affect the runtime. You can use this function to analyze the saved list until the next rescheduling run, which writes over the result. If you start rescheduling in the background, a spool file with the result list referred to will be created in the corresponding setting. You can see this in spool management.
    Output
    A list of changed documents, a list of documents in which an error occurred during processing and as a result were not changed, can be called up via the menu 'Edit - Error log'. If in a subsequent evaluation a restricted selection is carried out, a note appears at the end of the list to say that not all document items are displayed.
    You can set the scope of the list under the menu option 'List' in the list display. You can view improvements, deteriorations and the whole list. Before the documents can be included in one or either of the restricted lists, the date or quantity has to have changed so that the item can be contained in both the list of improved or deteriorated documents.
    You can use the interface for changing transactions and the order list to navigate. Use 'Back' to exit the list and 'New selection' to return to the selection screen.
    Recommendation
    You should only start this program occasionally and use very restricted selectin criteria during working hours as it requires enormous system resources.
    Note
    The columns for 'New date' and 'New confirmed qty' only contain entries if the dates or quantities have changed.
    As the system only runs the change check (dates/quantities) per line in the original list, an item whose backlog has increased in the list of improvements. This occurs, for example, if the whole quantity can be delivered at once but at a later date. In this situation, the system determines an increase for the line when it compares quantities.
    Regards,
    Amrish Purohit

  • Dectivate pricing condition for sales order not service order.

    Hi,
    We are on ECC6.0 and CRM5.0
    I need to add new condition type to the existing pricing procedure.It should be activtaed only for service orders and not for sales order.I can achive this by adding new requirement in pricing procedure to limit this condition type based on order type.
    Example:  if KOMK-AUART eq ORDER_TYPE.
                    sy-subrc = 0.
    But I don't want to do this,because I would need to change this requirement everytime I add new service order type.
    Is there any field in Pricing structure KOMK bu using which we can achieve this. ?
    Please suggest any other idea by which I can achieve this
    Thanks
    Dona

    Currently ,we have one pricing procedures for both the scenarios...
    We control if the perticular condition type to be active or not by writing a requirement which checks the order types.
    This has been done this way because we  built the pricing procedure in ECC and tranfer it to CRM.Also we donot have service orders in ECC.
    any further alternatives guys..

  • Searching for Sales orders with a particular condition type..

    Hi,
    I'm searching for sales orders and purchase orders which contain a particular condition type, can someone please point me in the right direction?
    Regards,
    Attiq

    Hi,
    Goto SE16 and put KONV
    Put the particular condition type that you are looking for and execute
    Copy the KONV- KNUMV value for all the records found
    Goto SE16 and put VBAK / VBRK
    in the field VBAK-KNUMV or VBRK-KNUMV put the copied data from step three and execute
    Note all the corresponding document number i.e. VBAK-VBELN / VBRK-VBELN
    Pls reward if helpful.
    Regards,
    Pramod.

  • Integration model for sales orders failing repeatedly

    Integration model for Sales Orders to APO is failing and in the CIF the error says "Customer requirement G BR 0082372353 900010 0000: liveCache problem, retu".
    This error appears everytime you we run the integration model and it says in the Job log; ABAP/4 Processor: SYSTEM_CANCELED.
    Note that this is "not" manually stopped but it still gives this error.

    Hi Kailash,
    Run /SAPAPO/SDRQCR21 in apo for the part contained in your delivery document, which is failing. While running the report, check the radiobutton, Build the requirements from Doc.Flow table. This will remove the inconsistencies remaining in the requirement table on R/3 side.
    Try this and let us know, if you could succeed.
    Regards
    Sanjeev

  • Product valuation for Sales order with itemizations

    Hi experts,
       I'm trying to find a data source which extracts Product valuation for sales order, and which is important, with itemizations. This is for the KMAT material. I tried 0CO_ACT_* and 0CO_PC_PCP_* but found no proper one.
       The closest one is 0CO_PC_PCP_03 but which only extracts normal material instead of KMAT.
       Points will awarded.
    B'R
    Aaron

    I found it.
    0CO_PC_01
    Cost Object Controlling: Plan/Actual Data

  • Extracting User Status for Sales Orders

    I am trying to extract user status transactional data for sales orders (at both the header and item level).  I have been following SAP note 300300 to configure the status extractors and map the BW objects to sales order status data sources (2LIS_11_VASTH & 2LIS_11_VASTI).  I think I have set up both R/3 and BW correctly according to note 300300 and the IMG documentation, but I am not getting any values in the info source for the new user status info objects, when I run the extract.
    Has anyone successfully done this?  If so, do you have any documentation or pointers on how I can get this to work?  Or, am I better off creating a generic extractor?  Thanks for your consideration.
    Sincerely, Hashi Chakravarty

    Hello Ravi,
    well yes, I can derive the status for that order in the update rules if i show the status as an attribute of the 0pm_order; but basically there will be only the last status shown.
    My problem:
    a. i report on day 1, the status of the order is REL
    b. on day 2 i load the master data for the orders, new status is TECO
    c. on day three i want to report in the past and see the status of day 1; that's not possible in this scenario because i'll see the current status (TECO).
    So that's why I want to have the statuses in the cube...
    The 2lis_17_i3hdr extractor is only sensitive to CRT and TECO statuses, but not to the others (like REL / BLC and so on... :_(( )
    I could read the statuses from the JEST and TJ02T tables...but still, if a document status is changed, no delta record is written in the queue...
    Thanks,
    Tudor

  • TABLE/FIELD FOR SALES ORDER'S SHIP TO LOCATION

    Hi everyone,
    Does anyone tell me what is the related tables/fields for Sales Order's Ship To Location? Since I want to display the Ship To Location information in the Oracle Report in Oracle Apps R11i.
    I tried to use the following SQL select statement to retrieve the Ship to address:-
    -- SHIP TO LOCATION
    select a.address_id, c.customer_name, C.CUSTOMER_ID, A.SITE_USE_ID from ra_Site_uses_all a, ra_addresses_all b, ra_customers c
    where a.site_use_code = 'SHIP_TO' and
    a.status = 'A' and
         b.address_id = a.address_id and
         c.CUSTOMER_ID = b.CUSTOMER_ID and
         b.status = 'A' and
         c.customer_id in (select customer_id from ra_customers) and
         c.status = 'A' and
         c.customer_name like 'CLARION (H.K.)%'
    But I found that the data is BILL TO address. Can anyone help me? Thanks.

    Hi all, I managed to solve my problem. Here's the query in case someone need it. Thanks
    SELECT party.party_name "Send to" (SELECT party.party_name
    FROM hz_cust_site_uses_all bill_su,
    hz_cust_acct_sites_all bill_cas,
    hz_party_sites bill_ps,
    hz_locations bill_loc,
    hz_parties party,
    oe_order_headers_all h
    WHERE h.invoice_to_org_id = bill_su.site_use_id
    AND bill_su.cust_acct_site_id = bill_cas.cust_acct_site_id
    AND bill_cas.party_site_id = bill_ps.party_site_id
    AND bill_loc.location_id = bill_ps.location_id
    AND bill_cas.party_site_id = bill_ps.party_site_id
    AND bill_ps.party_id = party.party_id
    AND h.order_number = 'your_order_number') "Invoice to"
    FROM oe_order_headers_all h,
    hz_cust_site_uses_all ship_su,
    hz_cust_acct_sites_all ship_cas,
    hz_party_sites ship_ps,
    hz_locations ship_loc,
    hz_parties party
    WHERE h.ship_to_org_id = ship_su.site_use_id
    AND ship_cas.party_site_id = ship_ps.party_site_id
    AND ship_su.cust_acct_site_id = ship_cas.cust_acct_site_id
    AND ship_cas.party_site_id = ship_ps.party_site_id
    AND ship_ps.party_id = party.party_id
    AND ship_loc.location_id = ship_ps.location_id
    AND h.order_number = 'your_order_number';

Maybe you are looking for

  • SharePoint 2010 - Claims Based Authentication - Access Denied for AD Group members

    We're in the process of migrating our SharePoint 2003 system to 2010 and have used Metavis to migrate the data. We had to do the data migration in a lab environment and then move/attach the content database to our production server. The database atta

  • Training nd Event Management Question

    I have an event scheduled in the past period in T&E Management. I am still able to book attandees to this event .. I think this is not right. However, I would like to know if there is any follow up action I need to do on this event so that the event

  • Not authorized  in the Enterprise Portal

    Hi, I have a problem setting up the portal. When browsing to the User Administration tab I get: "You are not authorized to access this application; contact your system administrator". I'm logged on as J2EE_ADMIN. Should I log on as another user? Is t

  • Problem with "Message Display Tool"  PI 7.0 SP10

    Dear SDN, After upgrading PI 7.0 from SP09 to SP10 the "Message Display Tool" does not work well. When executing: "Runtime Workbench" > Message Monitoring > Integration Engine > Details (of a selected message) > "Message Display Tool" > Message Conte

  • Need Help Streaming Video From Web Server Built Into Application - Linksys WRT54g Router

    Very much appreciate any help getting streaming video feed from web server built into video application to work properly using port forwarding on my Linksys WRT54g wireless router. Here is the situation: My PC is connected to the internet via a Links