Schedule agreement print

All,
I have created schedule agreement in ME31L. Agreement is LPA .Then ME38 created delivery schedules.
Now ME84 created releases for this.
Now for application EV, NEU smartform is assigned and ME9L its getting preview of SA.
Now for Application EL , LPH1 smartform is assigned, but no print preview in ME9E.
While ME84 , I have selected Forecast and JIT schedules.
ME9E selection parameter, release type I put as blank .
1.Can anyone please explain why print is not triggered?
2. Pls explain when LPH1 , LPH2 ,LPJ1,LPJ2 etc will be triggered.?
Thanks

Hopefully you have solved this by now, but for future readers:
Make sure you have assigned "Conditions" for the Output Types you need.
Go to NACE, select Application EL, and click on the "Condition records" button.
Double-click on the Output Type you need, and select the proper "Key Combination". If it is standard SAP, you will have three choices, all starting with "Purchasing Output Determination":
Choose "Purch. Org/Vendor for EDI" to make it Vendor Specific
Enter each of the Vendors to which you want to send this document.
Choose Document Type to make it happen for all Vendors
Enter LPA to create the output for all Vendors.
Hope this helps.

Similar Messages

Schedule agreement print out not coming in ME9L

Hi,
I have created a schedule agrement in ME31L and after that I have created scheudle lines in ME38, NOW while taking printout in ME9L system is giving message as no suitable doucment found I have add message NEU i while creating agrementin ME31L
what can be the problem.
regards,
zafar

Hi,
you are right, there is no release documentation for LP, but you still have to create schedules in Me38 to get delivery schedules in ME9E.
Regarding ME9L , its the normal process as with any other purchase document , needs to be released if subjected to document release procedure.
Note : release documentation is not to be confused with document release procedure.
for more info on release documentation [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/75/ee0f6755c811d189900000e8322d00/content.htm]
Regards
Edited by: Rajaneesh Marpalli on Aug 18, 2010 4:46 PM

Scheduling Agreement with print out

Hello
I created one Scheduling agreement for vendor A1 and created schedule lines .
in header Data of this Scheduling agreement i have mentioned the Invoicing party is B1
when i take the print out of Invoicing document the Vendor A1 disply , it is not taking the Invoicing party B1 i print out
i have defined in Patrner in that who is supplier, order , and who is invoicing party
that's$why iam search the header data of Scheduling agreement in that i got invoicing party is B1 is there, still in print out i got wrong vendor no why?
one thing is
this B1 is not defined for perticular Purchasing org, i ahve searched in LFM1 table, is this the reason
i have searched the out put determination for date 14.06.2007 here only partner is A1 is this a reason, shall we define the invoicing party in output determination
totaly i want the name of invoicing party in print out
regards
sapman

Hi,
the partner functions only store the data (i.e. addresses etc.) and make it available for the print program.
You have to code the print program to get it to use the correct vendor for the addresses etc.
The invoicing party address is not normally referenced on the scheduling agreement prints because this si the address that the payment is made to and the address that sends the invoice to you. Why woukld you print the vendors invoice address or name on the scheduling agreement? It is the OA (Ordering Address) that is relevant for the print of the scheduling agreement or schedules.
So why would you print the invoicing vendor's details on a scheduling agreement print out?
Steve B

Error generating release against scheduling agreement (cause 6) in ME38

Hello Experts,
Need your inputs on the the below error getting generated in ME38
Error generating release against scheduling agreement (cause 6)
Message no. 06857
Diagnosis
The function module for generating a scheduling agreement release (forecast delivery schedule or JIT delivery schedule) has run up against an error, causing processing to be terminated.
In this case the cause of the error is 6.
System Response
The error may involve one of the following situations:
1: The nature of the error cannot be specified precisely.
2: The forecast delivery schedule or the JIT delivery schedule was generated but no message record could be generated.
3: A document type for which the functions "Generate forecast delivery schedule" or "Generate JIT delivery schedule" are not defined may be involved.
4: A material for which the function "Generate JIT delivery schedule" is not defined may be involved.
5: A scheduling agreement that has not yet been released by all persons responsible may be involved.
6: The factory calendar has not been maintained correctly.
Procedure
Error source 1:
Check whether the vendor and plant shown in the PO actually exist in the system.
Error source 2:
Check the Customizing facility for message determination with respect to delivery schedules created under scheduling agreements (print operation '9').
Error source 3:
In Customizing, maintain the document types accordingly ( Define document types for scheduling agreement). Then create a new scheduling agreement with a document type for which release documentation is defined.
Error source 4:
Maintain the JIT delivery schedule indicator in the material master record.
Error source 5:
Have the scheduling agreement released by the person(s) responsible.
Error source 6:
If you are using a release creation profile without aggregation, you must maintain the factory calendar for the next 999 days
Regards,
Santosh

Hello Mallinath,
I referred the note and following are the observarion in the system.
Step1:Run T-code SE16 (table T001W) to check the calendar ID of the plant.
-----Referred the Calendor ID
Step2: Check the JIT/Forecast delivery schedule of release creation profile in customizing. (T-code OLME -> Scheduling Agreement -> Maint. Rel. Creation Profile for Sched. Agmt. w. Rel. Docu.)
Run T-code SCAL to adjust the period of the calendar ID which checked in STEP 1 according to the JIT/Forecast delivery schedule of the release creation profile which checked in STEP 2.
(For example, if the JIT/Forecast delivery schedule of the release creation profile is "999" days, then the calendar should be extended for the next 999 days at least)
---------In this case factory calendor is valid till 2015 and according to note needs to change the factory calendor till 2018( or for 999 days) ?
Waiting for your inputs.
Thanking you,
Santosh

Schedule agreement LPA

Dear All,
I have maintained the Scheduling agreement with LPA doc type with creation profile 0001 after JIT indicator maintained in material master.
I maintained delivery schedule in ME38 and saved.
But when i try to Generate JIT or Forecast schedules error appears as below.
Error generating release against scheduling agreement (cause 2)
Message no. 06857
Diagnosis
The function module for generating a scheduling agreement release (forecast delivery schedule or JIT delivery schedule) has run up against an error, causing processing to be terminated.
In this case the cause of the error is 2.
System Response
The error may involve one of the following situations:
1: The nature of the error cannot be specified precisely.
2: The forecast delivery schedule or the JIT delivery schedule was generated but no message record could be generated.
3: A document type for which the functions "Generate forecast delivery schedule" or "Generate JIT delivery schedule" are not defined may be involved.
4: A material for which the function "Generate JIT delivery schedule" is not defined may be involved.
5: A scheduling agreement that has not yet been released by all persons responsible may be involved.
6: The factory calendar has not been maintained correctly.
Procedure
Error source 1:
Check whether the vendor and plant shown in the PO actually exist in the system.
Error source 2:
Check the Customizing facility for message determination with respect to delivery schedules created under scheduling agreements (print operation '9').
Error source 3:
In Customizing, maintain the document types accordingly ( Define document types for scheduling agreement). Then create a new scheduling agreement with a document type for which release documentation is defined.
Error source 4:
Maintain the JIT delivery schedule indicator in the material master record.
Error source 5:
Have the scheduling agreement released by the person(s) responsible.
Error source 6:
If you are using a release creation profile without aggregation, you must maintain the factory calendar for the next 999 days.
Please advice how to proceed further?
I tried to run ME84 but no output found.
Regards

Kindly check the thread
SA delivery schedule release problem

Printing of changed line item in scheduling agreement smart form.

Hi experts,
I am facing problem in printing of changed line item in schedule agreement.
can any body tell me how to find the line item has been changed through programming?what is the procedure to fetch the data for new line item.its
very urgent for me.
Please help me in this regard.
Priti Shrivastava

Hi
with the help of T180-TRTYP field you know if that doc has been changed or created.
If it is not equal to H it is changed. H means created.
pass the TCODE of Sched Agreement and check this field.
You can use the CDHDR and CDPOS table s to get the changed values of new item.
Reward points if useful
Regards
Anji
Message was edited by:
Anji Reddy Vangala

JMIP Print in Scheduling agreement

Dear Friends,
I am not getting the print of JMIP (excise duties) in scheduling agreement, but in Po i get this, I have maintained FV11 & selected tax code.
Kindly give the solution.
regards,
MD

once check the pricing procedure whether the print field is checked X for that condition type

Header text not printed for scheduling agreement

Hi All,
I have issue with header text print out for scheduling agreement (SA).
In SA when I am manually writing some note and then taking print out, system is giving me correct output with maual note.
I have one standard text (ST) which I need to be printed in evry SA, so in SPRO I created new head text for vendor and in copying rule for text for SA, I created linkage of SA header text with Vendor head text.
In vendor master, I inserted ST in newly created vendor header text.
So now when ever I create new SA for vendor system will determin header text from vendor master.
Now after creating SA when I check the SA, I am able to my ST in SA, but at the time of print out this ST in not printing.
Please let me know what could be the reson.
Regards,
Sameer

I dont understand about what you mean by expand.
When you a print PO, PO text (header or item) it will check to the configuration setting.
The system didnt care if its adopted from vendor master or info record, or whatever you make in the copying rule.
In your case : you create a standard text then it get copied into PO , then you set the standard text to the PO for print out, example the standard text : word is
"xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
Then in the PO the text appear will be like below(the same, because it get copied)
"xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
If you configure it in define text for SA, then it the print out it will also (the same)
"xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
So what text need to expand?

Version wise print out of Scheduling Agreement

Hi,
Client uses scheduling agreement extensively. One SA per annum per vendor is maintained as a policy. A number of items are included almost on a weekly basis. Some times, they miss to take the print out of say version 10 and currently the version is say 15. In some cases, this print out of version 10 might be lost in transit.
Now, user wants to take the print out of version 10 alone. Currently, the print out is designed such that the latest version (15) only can be printed with the corresponding change alone (or) the total SA can be printed including details as per current version (15).
We can not ask them to send the total SA print out as it runs into pages.
Please advise how can I take the print out of SA for version 10 alone, in the above case.
Thanks & Regards,
Siva

Take the help from ABAPer and give your requirment to print the tax at item level.

Print scheduling agreement release with zero demand

Hello all,
we have a print problem with purchasing scheduling agreements:
when I go to ME38 to the scheduling agreement release docu and print out the latest release which has a zero amount for scheduled quantity, I'll get the error message
no print relevant changes to document xxxx exist.
ME140
I know there are already some threads about this topic in the forums but I was not able to find a helpful answer yet.
Thanks
Anne

hi
please check the message which are already available status is "Green". if its green you have to create another message and you have to print it again..

Transaction ME9E - Printing Single Line Schedule Agreement

We are trying to print a line item that has a different delivery address than that of the header. This is a single line document and the address is different. The problem we have is when the scheduling agreements has only one part number and the delivery address for the part number is different then the default company/plant address. This process is predominant when you have subcontract process. We are unable to print the address at the line level for a single line document but system does this correctly and prints this delivery address when there are two part numbers in scheduling agreement. How can we get this to work for us for single item documents? This is critical for our end user. We need to have the system access the text element ITEM_DELADDRESS in the MAIN window and not produce the address in the HEADER_DELADDRESS element in the CONSGNEE window.

Hello,
There are two possible status for schedule lines:
        1- Fixed schedule lines : System doesn't change these schedule lines upon MRP run
        2 Non fixed schedule lines : during MRP run, system deletes these schedule lines and creates new ones.
To make a schedule line fixed there are two possibilities:
                    1- User set manually the indicator fixed schedule line in transaction ME38
                    2- Schedule line lies within the firm period.
The firm period :
For each schedule agreement you can define the firm zone :
1- ME32L change schedule agreement
2- select the item then in toolbar> Item> More function-->additional data Scheduling control
enter the firm zone "number of days".
If schedule line lies whithin this zone system will kepp it and create new line for additional requirement
Best Regards

SCHEDULE AGREEMENT-DELIVERY SCHEDULE LINE ITEM PRINTING

Scheduling agreement is created in ECC.
Delivery schedule line items are generated using APO and CIFed over to ECC.
Upon displaying in ME38 in ECC, the delivery schedule line items are appearing as required. The problem is that no output type is displayed for condition type LPET even though the settings are done & condition records are maintained.
Can someone throw some light on this?

Hi Anil ,
Goto Transaction NACE , Select Application EL and then Click on O/p Types.
Select your o/p and click on Processing routines.
Make a copy of medium 1 and change it to 5. The program , Form , Form routine would remain the same.
Maintain condition records with medium 5 in MN10.
Ensure that email address exists in Vendor Master.
Check with ur Basis to make sure that the setting are done in Transaction SCOT for sending document via PDF.
Create a new Agreement and test it.
Regards
Ramesh Ch

Scheduling agreement, unnecessary delivery schedule lines

Hello
We use Scheduling agreements for purchasing spare parts. The MRP run checks the warehouse requirements and creates delivery schedule line to scheduling agreement.
Now the MRP run creates unnecessary delivery schedule lines to scheduling agreement if the earlier created delivery schedule line's delivery date has been changed manually.
For example,
Today the MRP run finds requirement for one article and creates the delivery schedule line, where delivery date is 2.9.2008 (determined from articles basic data).
The Vendor confirms the delivery date as 3.10.2008 and the purchaser changes manually (transaction ME38) the delivery date to delivery schedule line accordingly and prints the created message.
The next MRP run creates new delivery schedule line, where delivery date is again 2.9.2008.
now there are two open delivery schedule lines for this article with delivery dates 3.10.2008 and 2.9.2008.
Why the MRP run does not notice the existing delivery schedule line with the new delivery date 3.10.2008?
we have changed delivery dates manually several years and this has never happened before.
could you please help me to resolve this.
Thanks in advance,
Srikanth

In addition to the above post,
as you changed the date manually from 2nd to 3rd....
so there are was no report for 2nd generated ulitmately...and if generated it was changed...right...
so when you again run the mrp...the system will generate one more pr for the same article....
this ultimately happens because of the set del dates in the MMR as i told above..
Hope it helps..
Regards
Priyanka.P

Scheduling agreement MRP run

Hi All,
We use Scheduling agreements for purchasing spare parts. The nightly MRP run checks the warehouse requirements and creates delivery schedule line to scheduling agreement.
Now the MRP run creates unnecessary delivery schedule lines to scheduling agreement if the earlier created delivery schedule line's delivery date has been changed manually.
Today the MRP run finds requirement for article XYZ and creates the delivery schedule line, where delivery date is 2.9.2008 (determined from articles basic data).
The Vendor confirms the delivery date as 3.10.2008 and the purchaser changes manually (transaction ME38) the delivery date to delivery schedule line accordingly and prints the created message.
The next MRP run creates new delivery schedule line, where delivery date is again 2.9.2008.
After that there are two open delivery schedule lines for article XYZ with delivery dates 3.10.2008 and 2.9.2008.
Why the MRP run does not notice the existing delivery schedule line with the new delivery date 3.10.2008?

issue resolved

SCHEDULING AGREEMENT AND SCHEDULING LINE CREATION

Hello Guys,
I trying creating a scheduling agreement(SA) for vendor & material combination.
I have created a Scheduling agreement in ME31L then maintained in ME38.
In ME38 i have also mentioned the delivery date. when i am checking EKKO for Purchasing document , its created with the delivery date specified.
My question is how to create a schedule line ? Do we need to maintain a source list of that material, plant and vendor.
If we have the source list maintained, then what is the next step after SA is created and maintained.
Do we need to do MIGO? because i tested by creating one SA in ME31L and maintained in ME38. I mentioned the delivery date as today and when i checked EKKO table the Purchasing document is created.
Do i need to create a Purchase Order?
If no then do i need to do MIGO? If i need to do MIGO, for what reference do i need to do MIGO???
My client never maintained a Scheduling agreement, they want the scheduled lines to be created and sent to vendor and we need to receive the goods on specified delivery date.
Help will be appreciated.
Thanks.

Hi,
You need to make a distinction between the scheduling agreement (ME31L/ME32L) and the delivery schedule creation (ME38/ME84)
With ME31L you create the scheduling agreement. In the scheduling agreement which is created for a vendor you maintain the parts that you will order at this vendor, the target quantity that you will order over a certain period and the price.
In ME38 you use the scheduling agreement number that is created with ME31L to create schedule lines (manually). These schedule lines consist of a date and an quantity. This is the data that needs to be transmitted to the vendor and against which the vendor is shipping the ordered materials.
Once the vendor ships the materials you post the goods receipt in Migo against the scheduling agreement number.
That is the basic working of the scheduling agreement and the delivery schedule.
Now some remarks.
You need to set-up the required output conditions for transmitting the data to the vendor either via print, fax, email or EDI.
You can do this manually in each scheduling agreement and each release but typically you maintain the output condition records.
For scheduling agreement contract (ME31L) you use transaction MN07.
For the delivery schedule (ME38/ME84) you use transaction MN10.
In order for you to be able to post the goods receipt the delivery schedule needs to have been transmitted otherwise you will get a message that not requirement are found when trying to post goods receipt.
Also the goods receipt can only be posted if the requirements are valid on the day that you are performing MIGO. This means if you would post GR today then the open requirements in the scheduling agreement need to be for today or already from previous dates. The system will not allow you to post GR for quantities that are only due tomorrow (if this is required a user exit needs to be set-up).
If you want schedule lines created via MRP then you need to set-up a source list using ME01. You have to make sure that the MRP key is set to 2 in orer for the system to generate schedule lines and you also have to make sure that you have the correct MRP parameters set-up.
You can use ME84 to transmit the delivery schedule lines generated by MRP if no changes are required. With the ME84 you can transmit multiple releases at once, however this transaction can not be used to make manual changes to the MRP proposal.
The scheduling agreement offers lot's more possibilities but the above should get you going with the basics.
Hope this will help you on your way.

Schedule agreement print

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for