Security issue when mi server interacts with multiple backend.

hii all,
i wanted to know that if suppose mi server is interacting with multiple backend then how to maintain application access
security for differnt back end and how & where to customize or configure it.
thanks in advance.

Hi Dev,
Every syncBo has a RFC destination which represent the target system (backend) on which the bapi wrappers for that particular syncBo resides. This RFC destination is configured in the transaction SM59, which provides you with various secuirty configurations.
For more info consult your basis consultant in this regards.
Regards,
Rahul
If this helps, do not forget my points

Similar Messages

Powerview Cannot connect to the server due to a security issue. The server may not have been able to match the host for silverlight

Hello,
I have a sharepoint 2010 sp1 CU Dec 2011 server with a SQL Server 2012 SP1 CU4 reporting services instance. I am able to open Power View and use it normally when bypassing the ISA Reverse Proxy server. However when going thru ISA I receive the
following Error.
Power View Cannot connect to the server due to a security issue. The server may not have been able to match the host for Silverlight. This error appears after I click yes on an Internet Explorer Display Mixed Mode prompt.
I've seen a couple references to this issue but not much. This one mentions a clientaccesspolicy.xml file but I haven't had any luck with that. http://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/details/716433/cannot-connect-to-the-server-due-to-a-security-issue-the-server-may-not-have-been-able-to-match-the-host-for-silverlight
Any Ideas? Thanks.
Ryan

Hi Ryan,
Based on my research, the issue should occur due to a by design behavior in Threat Management Gateway (TMG). To work around this issue, you can use SSL between the TMG and the SharePoint Web Server.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Mike Yin
TechNet Community Support

Safari for Windows crashes when trying to interact with bookmarks

Hello, I've installed Safari for Windows but when trying to interact with bookmarks, it crashes everytime.
Trying to view, create or import bookmarks all wield the same result: instant crash.
Can someone help ?
Thanks!

Just to try, I copied the en.lproj to es.lproj in every subfolder on Program Files/Safari, this because I have a Spanish (Mexico) regional setting, and after a Safari restart, bookmarks now works and even imported my info from IE and Firefox. This also worked me for other issues. More details in:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=993697&tstart=0

JNDI Lookup for multiple server instances with multiple cluster nodes

Hi Experts,
I need help with retreiving log files for multiple server instances with multiple cluster nodes. The system is Netweaver 7.01.
There are 3 server instances all instances with 3 cluster nodes.
There are EJB session beans deployed on them to retreive the log information for each server node.
In the session bean there is a method:
public List getServers() {
List servers = new ArrayList();
ClassLoader saveLoader = Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader();
try {
   Properties prop = new Properties();
   prop.setProperty(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY, "com.sap.engine.services.jndi.InitialContextFactoryImpl");
   prop.put(Context.SECURITY_AUTHENTICATION, "none");
   Thread.currentThread().setContextClassLoader((com.sap.engine.services.adminadapter.interfaces.RemoteAdminInterface.class).getClassLoader());
   InitialContext mInitialContext = new InitialContext(prop);
   RemoteAdminInterface rai = (RemoteAdminInterface) mInitialContext.lookup("adminadapter");
   ClusterAdministrator cadm = rai.getClusterAdministrator();
   ConvenienceEngineAdministrator cea = rai.getConvenienceEngineAdministrator();
   int nodeId[] = cea.getClusterNodeIds();
   int dispatcherId = 0;
   String dispatcherIP = null;
   String p4Port = null;
   for (int i = 0; i < nodeId.length; i++) {
    if (cea.getClusterNodeType(nodeId[i]) != 1)
     continue;
    Properties dispatcherProp = cadm.getNodeInfo(nodeId[i]);
    dispatcherIP = dispatcherProp.getProperty("Host", "localhost");
    p4Port = cea.getServiceProperty(nodeId[i], "p4", "port");
    String[] loc = new String[3];
    loc[0] = dispatcherIP;
    loc[1] = p4Port;
    loc[2] = null;
    servers.add(loc);
   mInitialContext.close();
} catch (NamingException e) {
} catch (RemoteException e) {
} finally {
   Thread.currentThread().setContextClassLoader(saveLoader);
return servers;
and the retreived server information used here in another class:
public void run() {
ReadLogsSession readLogsSession;
int total = servers.size();
for (Iterator iter = servers.iterator(); iter.hasNext();) {
   if (keepAlive) {
    try {
     Thread.sleep(500);
    } catch (InterruptedException e) {
     status = status + e.getMessage();
     System.err.println("LogReader Thread Exception" + e.toString());
     e.printStackTrace();
    String[] serverLocs = (String[]) iter.next();
    searchFilter.setDetails("[" + serverLocs[1] + "]");
    Properties prop = new Properties();
    prop.put(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY, "com.sap.engine.services.jndi.InitialContextFactoryImpl");
    prop.put(Context.PROVIDER_URL, serverLocs[0] + ":" + serverLocs[1]);
    System.err.println("LogReader run [" + serverLocs[0] + ":" + serverLocs[1] + "]");
    status = " Reading :[" + serverLocs[0] + ":" + serverLocs[1] + "] servers :[" + currentIndex + "/" + total + " ] ";
    prop.put("force_remote", "true");
    prop.put(Context.SECURITY_AUTHENTICATION, "none");
    try {
     Context ctx = new InitialContext(prop);
     Object ob = ctx.lookup("com.xom.sia.ReadLogsSession");
     ReadLogsSessionHome readLogsSessionHome = (ReadLogsSessionHome) PortableRemoteObject.narrow(ob, ReadLogsSessionHome.class);
     status = status + "Found ReadLogsSessionHome ["+readLogsSessionHome+"]";
     readLogsSession = readLogsSessionHome.create();
     if(readLogsSession!=null){
      status = status + " Created ["+readLogsSession+"]";
      List l = readLogsSession.getAuditLogs(searchFilter);
      serverLocs[2] = String.valueOf(l.size());
      status = status + serverLocs[2];
      allRecords.addAll(l);
     }else{
      status = status + " unable to create readLogsSession ";
     ctx.close();
    } catch (NamingException e) {
     status = status + e.getMessage();
     System.err.println(e.getMessage());
     e.printStackTrace();
    } catch (CreateException e) {
     status = status + e.getMessage();
     System.err.println(e.getMessage());
     e.printStackTrace();
    } catch (IOException e) {
     status = status + e.getMessage();
     System.err.println(e.getMessage());
     e.printStackTrace();
    } catch (Exception e) {
     status = status + e.getMessage();
     System.err.println(e.getMessage());
     e.printStackTrace();
   currentIndex++;
jobComplete = true;
The application is working for multiple server instances with a single cluster node but not working for multiple cusltered environment.
Anybody knows what should be changed to handle more cluster nodes?
Thanks,
Gergely

Thanks for the response.
I was afraid that it would be something like that although
was hoping for
something closer to the application pools we use with IIS to
isolate sites
and limit the impact one badly behaving one can have on
another.
mmr
"Ian Skinner" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:fe5u5v$pue$[email protected]..
> Run CF with one instance. Look at your processes and see
how much memory
> the "JRun" process is using, multiply this by number of
other CF
> instances.
>
> You are most likely going to end up on implementing a
"handful" of
> instances versus "dozens" of instance on all but the
beefiest of servers.
>
> This can be affected by how much memory each instance
uses. An
> application that puts major amounts of data into
persistent scopes such as
> application and|or session will have a larger foot print
then a leaner
> application that does not put much data into memory
and|or leave it there
> for a very long time.
>
> I know the first time we made use of CF in it's
multi-home flavor, we went
> a bit overboard and created way too many. After nearly
bringing a
> moderate server to its knees, we consolidated until we
had three or four
> or so IIRC. A couple dedicated to to each of our largest
and most
> critical applications and a couple general instances
that ran many smaller
> applications each.
>
>
>
>
>

When i close window with multiple tabs angd start new session (open new window) old tabs open again, how can i stop it?

when i close window with multiple tabs and start new session (open new window) old tabs open again, how can i stop it?

It is possible that there is a problem with the files [http://kb.mozillazine.org/sessionstore.js sessionstore.js] and sessionstore.bak in the [http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox Profile Folder]
Delete [http://kb.mozillazine.org/sessionstore.js sessionstore.js] and sessionstore.bak in the [http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox Profile Folder]
* Help > Troubleshooting Information > Profile Directory: Open Containing Folder
If you see files sessionstore-##.js with a number in the left part of the name like sessionstore-1.js then delete those as well.
Deleting sessionstore.js will cause App Tabs and Tab Groups to get lost, so you will have to create them again (make a note).
See:
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Session_Restore

One SRM integrated with multiple Backends

Hi All
Can One SRM be integrated with multiple Backends?
If so any insights, documentation, pros-cons that can you all can share?
Does the version of SRM or ECC matter?
SRM version will be 7.0 and ECC 6 EP3.
Thanks,
Gamad

Hi Gamad,
multiple backend systems for one SRM is normal and works fine.
You just need to connect the systems, replicate the materials/vendors you would like to use and maintain the SRM customizing:
1) Add the further backend system(s):
-> Supplier Relationship Management -> SRM Server -> Technical Basic Settings -> Define Backend Systems
2) Define the scenario/follow-on document creation for the product categories
-> Supplier Relationship Management -> SRM Server -> Technical Basic Settings -> Define Backend System for Product Category
3) Define the scenario/follow-on document creation for the product categories
-> Supplier Relationship Management -> SRM Server -> Cross-Application Basic Settings -> Define Objects in Backend System (Purch. Reqs, Reservations, Purch. Orders)
Regards,
Peter

Issue when clicking server tab in console

hi am in weblogic 10.6.0 so i have a problem when i click server tab in my console it take long to open that tab mybe 30 mins and than it show this error message in red
A server is an instance of WebLogic Server that runs in its own Java Virtual Machine (JVM) and has its own configuration.
This page summarizes each server that has been configured in the current WebLogic Server domain.
Message icon - Error A timeout occured while interacting with WLS_REPORTS. Limited information is available.
Message icon - Error A timeout occured while interacting with WLS_FORMS. Limited information is available.
Message icon - Error A timeout occured while interacting with WLS_REPORTS. Limited information is available.
Message icon - Error A timeout occured while interacting with WLS_FORMS. Limited information is available.

Hi,
Have you collected the Thread dump when you face the issue .Collected at least 5 -6 thread dump in an interval of 30 sec apart
Thread dump will help us to identify what may be the issue and will let us know what the server threads are doing or for what resource they are waiting .
Use the below link to see the different ways to collect the thread dumps
Thread dumps & Ways to take thread dumps - weblogicexpert
Hope it helps

Privacy/Security Issues when calling Geek Squad for repairs

I am extremely concerned about a call I received after scheduling an appt with the Geek Squad last night. I received a call from 800-845-6565 from a VERY persisent person advising that they were from the Geek Squad and that I need to access my computer because they were alerted that my computer had a virus. I told them that I was having TV issues not computers. Again, this person was very persistent about me accessing my computer to which I hung up on them. To my surprise when I googled this "800", the ongoing list of complaints that people have written about regarding receiving these calls and they all have happened after someone has had interaction with the Geek Squad. My greatest concern is, how did this person get my cellphone number from the Geek Squad? This obviously a fradulent business and can only imagine if a naive person would actually believe them and give access to their computer. Makes me wonder how secure all my info is with the Geek Squad. This call literally happened 5 minutes after I hung up with the Geek Squad. HOW CAN THIS HAPPEN??? I'm extremely leary now of using the Geek Squad now that I have purchased their 5 year warranty plan.

Hello marken0913-
I can absolutely understand your concern, especially after receiving such a suspicious call right after speaking to Geek Squad. If this happened to me I would feel the same way, especially with the kind of privacy concerns we have in this day in age.
It’s important to understand that reputable tech companies (like Geek Squad, Microsoft, and other recognized and reputable tech companies) will not scan computers remotely without permission from the owner. They will not call computer users unless they are already working with them on a support issue initiated by you. In this case you called us about a TV and not a computer, we would not call you about your computer.
In this instance, you were 100% correct in your handling of the call, and regrettably some people do fall prey to these scams. With that said, I can assure you that your private information was not released by Geek Squad as we take your privacy very seriously. For more information you can view our Privacy Policy here. It is my firm belief that the timing of the phone call was entirely coincidental.
Going forward, we do have a few precautions we recommend taking in these instances. Never provide credit card or banking information to someone on an unsolicited call. Never give remote access to your computer to any technician unless they can confirm they are a legitimate member of a computer support company with which you have an existing support agreement for the product they’re calling about. Change your password and make sure your anti-virus software is fully up to date.
Finally, when in doubt, hang up and call the company back at their publically listed telephone number. You can usually find contact information on their website. Our phone number for Geek Squad is (800) 433-5778, or you can contact Best Buy at (888) 237-8289.
Sincerely,

Suppress the pop-up box in iCal when "The server responded with an error"

So there are tons of questions already on this site about this pop-up error in iCal when trying to connect to Google calendars or MobileMe calendars. My issue is that the connection is fine 90% of the time, but every now and then the connection fails (it checks every 5 minutes) and I get this pop-up.
Now in a perfect world, this error would not result in a pop-up that demands my immediate attention, but would fail silently and simply try again 5 minutes later. Normally Apple's software design is sensible and would do things this way, so I'm totally confused why they think a pop-up (and bouncing dock icon) is anything but annoying, especially when I know it's not a big deal and will probably connect successfully next time.
Soooo... is there a top-secret way I can suppress this pop-up box? It is one of those things that can drive one insane. I even switched to BusyCal for a while but decided it wasn't quite worth $50 just to be rid of the pop-up.

Is this the pop-up you get?
The request for account “[email protected]” failed.
The server responded with
“HTTP/1.1 502 Bad Gateway”
to operation CalDAVAccountRefreshQueueableOperation.
I've never seen it before but am getting it this evening (UK time). Also if I try to log in to MMe Calendar it's not logging in but going to 'find my iPhone' like it did when Mail was mucking about a few weeks back.

ACE slowness issue when one server goes down

Hi,
We are having two application servers.Both are load balanced using ACE.
When we bring down one server, we find that when we upload some files into the second application server, its too slow.
But when primary server comes up again the performance increases.This issue happens only when we bring the primary server down.
We are using cookie based stickiness.Any ideas where we can look into.
Rgds.,
Sachin

Depending on the load-balancing algorithm or predictor that you configure, the ACE performs a series of checks and calculations to determine which server can best service each client request. The ACE bases server selection on several factors including the source or destination address, cookies, URLs, HTTP headers, or the server with the fewest connections with respect to load.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/app_ntwk_services/data_center_app_services/ace_appliances/vA1_7_/configuration/slb/guide/classlb.html

Issue when creating sales order with Sold-to/Ship-to Party's state

Hi All,
we have issue while creating Sales Order with picking up of State tax
for Ship-to-party & Sold-to-party.
<b>When we create a sales order, for the sold to party 140052732 and
ship to party 140052733 it is picking state tax. Which should not
suppose to pick? Because the partner is marked as tax exemption</b>.
Can any body tell me how can we solve this issue!
Why this is happening!
How to make not to pick tax when it is marked for tax exemtion.
As i am not Functional guy i am not aware what is happening here!
Can anybody solve this issue!
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Deep.

Hi Deep
What do you mean by "It is picking up state tax"? Does it mean that in the pricing procedure it is picking up a condition type which is meant for state tax?
If so go and check the condition record meant for it. Follow the following steps
1) Go to Sales order
2) Select the line item for which the state tax is being picked.
3) In the condition tab select analysis.
4) In Analysis you shall find the condition type meant for state tax.
5) See which condition record has been found.
6) Go to VK12, enter the state tax condition type and check the condition record for that state tax.
7) If wrong correct it.
8) If anything else come back to the post and inform the details
Thanks
Regards
Sunil

Issue when creating sales order with Sold-to/Ship-to Party's state tax

Hi All,
we have issue while creating Sales Order with picking up of State tax
for Ship-to-party & Sold-to-party.
<b>When we create a sales order, for the sold to party 140052732 and
ship to party 140052733 it is picking state tax. Which should not
suppose to pick? Because the partner is marked as tax exemption</b>.
Can any body tell me how can we solve this issue!
Why this is happening!
How to make not to pick tax when it is marked for tax exemtion.
As i am not Functional guy i am not aware what is happening here!
Can anybody solve this issue!
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Deep.

Hi Deep
What do you mean by "It is picking up state tax"? Does it mean that in the pricing procedure it is picking up a condition type which is meant for state tax?
If so go and check the condition record meant for it. Follow the following steps
1) Go to Sales order
2) Select the line item for which the state tax is being picked.
3) In the condition tab select analysis.
4) In Analysis you shall find the condition type meant for state tax.
5) See which condition record has been found.
6) Go to VK12, enter the state tax condition type and check the condition record for that state tax.
7) If wrong correct it.
8) If anything else come back to the post and inform the details
Thanks
Regards
Sunil

Rearrange pages when printing adobe form with multiple master pages

Hello!
Good day to you all.
I have an issue in regards with printing my adobe form with multiple Master pages. I have 4 master pages:
1st master page: a
2nd master page: b
3rd master page: c
4th master page: d
all with different headers and footers all having the same contents (items). I don't have issue with one page content (it just prints 4 pages with different headers and footers). The issue comes out once the items exceed 1 page.
What happens is that the preview/print shows (example: 3-page item)
a1-a2-a3-b1-b2-b3-c1-c2-c3-d1-d2-d3.
What i need is to print these such that all 1st pages of the 4 master page to be printed first, then all the 2nd pages, then all 3rd pages. Please see below:
a1-b1-c1-d1-a2-b2-c2-d2-a3-b3-c3-d3
This is because we will be using carbonless copy paper during printing and it's possible that it would be printed on batch jobs. Please suggest ways to do this.
Thanks a lot in advance!
Best Regards,
abap_peer_dangs

Hi,
Is that requirement of multiple pages as groups only at the time of print or at print preview also...?
Can you have a Print button on this screen or you should be using the Abobe toolbar's Print button..?
Well if this on a click of a button in the form and the requirement is only at the time of print and not on print prieview I can have a JS script which does this...
Let me know if this suffice, I can try with a local file and send you the script.
@ Chris: I didn't understand what do you mean by reported, I was eager to hear and learn a solution from you may be a new approach which I am not aware of ...?
Cheers,
Sai.

Security issue between weblogic server

Hello,
Here is security issue that we are facing.
Here is setup
Environment 1
Admin server say "env1admin"
Managed Weblogic Server say "env1managed"
We deployed an EJB called HelloEJB in env1managed server and this has an api
sayHello(). HelloClient is a client to HelloEJB.
S/w Weblogic 6.1 sp3
Environment 2
Admin server say "env2admin"
Managed Weblogic Server say "env2managed"
We deployed an EJB called ServiceEJB in env2managed server and this has an api
serviceRequest(). We use weblogic role based security and restrict access to this
api by user HelloEJB.
s/w Weblogic 6.1 sp3
Here is how the system works:
We start the env2admin, env2managed (ServiceEJB is which is a Stateless session
EJB deployed in env2Managed)
We start the env1admin and env1managed (HelloEJB(which is a Stateless session
EJB is deployed in env1Managed)
Test case:
1)HelloClient invokes HelloEJB api sayHello().
2)Now at this point in ejbCreate() at HelloEJB() end we get a reference to ServiceEJB
using Jndi and the context is never closed ). HelloEJB then calls serviceRequest()
api in ServiceEJB. Then gets back a response and then returns response to HelloClient.
Now if we repeat the above testcase.
After step1 in step2 HelloEJB though has all the permissions to invoke api on
ServiceEJB gets an SecurityException.
Question is why doe this happen. Only way HelloEJB can make api calls to serviceEJB
is by making a lookup() every single time. Which is very expensive. I looked at
documents what they say is leave the context open and never close it. Though I
am doing that I am getting this exception.
Any thoughts ?
Thanks in advance,
Vijay

Here are the details of exception stack trace:
java.rmi.AccessException: Security violation: insufficient permission to access
method; nested exception is:
java.lang.SecurityException: Security violation: insufficient permission
to access method
java.lang.SecurityException: Security violation: insufficient permission to access
method
at weblogic.ejb20.internal.BaseEJBObject.preInvoke(BaseEJBObject.java:92)
at weblogic.ejb20.internal.StatelessEJBObject.preInvoke(StatelessEJBObject.java:63)
at service.ServiceBean_nr0s19_EOImpl.sendServiceRequest(ServiceBean_nr0s19_EOImpl.java:25)
at service.ServiceBean_nr0s19_EOImpl_WLSkel.invoke(Unknown Source)
at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.invoke(BasicServerRef.java:298)
at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ReplicaAwareServerRef.invoke(ReplicaAwareServerRef.java:93)
at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.handleRequest(BasicServerRef.java:267)
at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicExecuteRequest.execute(BasicExecuteRequest.java:22)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:139)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120)
End server side stack trace
; nested exception is:
Vijay
"Vijay" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
Hello,
Here is security issue that we are facing.
Here is setup
Environment 1
Admin server say "env1admin"
Managed Weblogic Server say "env1managed"
We deployed an EJB called HelloEJB in env1managed server and this has
an api
sayHello(). HelloClient is a client to HelloEJB.
S/w Weblogic 6.1 sp3
Environment 2
Admin server say "env2admin"
Managed Weblogic Server say "env2managed"
We deployed an EJB called ServiceEJB in env2managed server and this has
an api
serviceRequest(). We use weblogic role based security and restrict access
to this
api by user HelloEJB.
s/w Weblogic 6.1 sp3
Here is how the system works:
We start the env2admin, env2managed (ServiceEJB is which is a Stateless
session
EJB deployed in env2Managed)
We start the env1admin and env1managed (HelloEJB(which is a Stateless
session
EJB is deployed in env1Managed)
Test case:
1)HelloClient invokes HelloEJB api sayHello().
2)Now at this point in ejbCreate() at HelloEJB() end we get a reference
to ServiceEJB
using Jndi and the context is never closed ). HelloEJB then calls serviceRequest()
api in ServiceEJB. Then gets back a response and then returns response
to HelloClient.
Now if we repeat the above testcase.
After step1 in step2 HelloEJB though has all the permissions to invoke
api on
ServiceEJB gets an SecurityException.
Question is why doe this happen. Only way HelloEJB can make api calls
to serviceEJB
is by making a lookup() every single time. Which is very expensive. I
looked at
documents what they say is leave the context open and never close it.
Though I
am doing that I am getting this exception.
Any thoughts ?
Thanks in advance,
Vijay

Performance issues when using AQ notification with one consumer

We have developed a system to load data from a reservation database to a reporting database
A a certain point in the proces, a message with the identifier of the reservation is enqueued to a queue (multi-consumer) on the same DB and then propagated to a similar queue on the REP database.
This queue (multi-consumer) has AQ notification enabled (with one consumer) which calls the queue_callback procedure which
- dequeues the message
- calls a procedure to load the Resv data into the Reporting schema (through DB link)
We need each message to be processed ONLY ONCE thus the usage of one single subscriber (consumer)
But when load testing our application with multiple threads, the number of records created in the Reservation Database becomes quite large, meaning a large number of messages going through the first queue and propagating to the second queue (very quickly).
But messages are not processed fast enough by the 2nd queue (notification) which falls behind.
I would like to keep using notification as processing is automatic (no need to set up dbms_jobs to dequeue etc..) or something similar
So having read articles, I feel I need to use:
- multiple subscribers to the 2nd queue where each message is processed only by one subscriber (using a rule : say 10 subscribers S0 to S10 with Si processing messages where last number of the identifier is i )
problem with this is that there is an attempt to process the message for each subscriber, isn't there
- a different dequeuing method where many processes are used in parallel , with each message is processed only by one subscriber
Does anyone have experience and recommendations to make on how to improve throughput of messages?
Rgds
Philippe

Hi, thanks for your interest
I am working with 10.2.0.4
My objective is to load a subset of the reservation data from the tables in the first DB (Reservation-OLTP-150 tables)
to the tables in the second DB (Reporting - about 15 tables at the moment), without affecting performance on the Reservation DB.
Thus the choice of advanced queueing (asyncronous )
- I have 2 similar queues in 2 separate databases ( AND Reporting)
The message payload is the same on both (the identifier of the reservation)
When a certain event happens on the RESERVATION database, I enqueue a message on the first database
Propagation moves the same message data to the second queue.
And there I have notification sending the message to a single consumer, which:
- calls dequeue
- and the data load procedure, which load this reservation
My performance difficulties start at the notification but I will post all the relevant code before notification, in case it has an impact.
- The 2nd queue was created with a script containing the following (similar script for fisrt queue)
dbms_aqadm.create_queue_table( queue_table => '&&CQT_QUEUE_TABLE_NAME',
queue_payload_type => 'RESV_DETAIL',
comment => 'Report queue table',
multiple_consumers => TRUE,
message_grouping => DBMS_AQADM.NONE,
compatible => '10.0.0',
sort_list => 'ENQ_TIME',
primary_instance => '0',
secondary_instance => '0');
dbms_aqadm.create_queue (
queue_name => '&&CRQ_QUEUE_NAME',
queue_table => '&&CRQ_QUEUE_TABLE_NAME',
max_retries => 5);
- ENQUEUING on the first queue (snippet of code)
o_resv_detail DLEX_AQ_ADMIN.RESV_DETAIL;
o_resv_detail:= DLEX_AQ_ADMIN.RESV_DETAIL(resvcode, resvhistorysequence);
DLEX_RESVEVENT_AQ.enqueue_one_message (o_resv_detail);
where DLEX_RESVEVENT_AQ.enqueue_one_message is :
PROCEDURE enqueue_one_message (msg IN RESV_DETAIL)
IS
enqopt           DBMS_AQ.enqueue_options_t;
mprop           DBMS_AQ.message_properties_t;
enq_msgid           dlex_resvevent_aq_admin.msgid_t;
BEGIN
DBMS_AQ.enqueue (queue_name => dlex_resvevent_aq_admin.c_resvevent_queue,
enqueue_options => enqopt,
message_properties => mprop,
payload => msg,
msgid => enq_msgid
END;
- PROPAGATION: The message is dequeued from 1st queue and enqueued automatically by AQ propagation into this 2nd queue.
(using a call to the following 'wrapper' procedure)
PROCEDURE schedule_propagate (
src_queue_name IN VARCHAR2,
destination IN VARCHAR2 DEFAULT NULL
IS
sprocname dlex_types.procname_t:= 'dlex_resvevent_aq_admin.schedule_propagate';
BEGIN
DBMS_AQADM.SCHEDULE_PROPAGATION(queue_name => src_queue_name,
                                        destination => destination,
latency => 10);
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS
THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (SQLERRM || ' occurred in ' || sprocname);
END schedule_propagate;
- For 'NOTIFICATION': ONE subscriber was created using:
EXECUTE DLEX_REPORT_AQ_ADMIN.add_subscriber('&&STQ_QUEUE_NAME','&&STQ_SUBSCRIBER',NULL,NULL, NULL);
this is a wrapper procedure that uses:
DBMS_AQADM.add_subscriber (queue_name => p_queue_name, subscriber => subscriber_agent );
Then notification is registered with:
EXECUTE dlex_report_aq_admin.register_notification_action ('&&AQ_SCHEMA','&&REPORT_QUEUE_NAME','&&REPORT_QUEUE_SUBSCRIBER');
- job_queue_processes is set to 10
- The callback procedure is as follows
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE DLEX_AQ_ADMIN.queue_callback
context RAW,
reginfo SYS.AQ$_REG_INFO,
descr SYS.AQ$_DESCRIPTOR,
payload RAW,
payloadl NUMBER
IS
s_procname CONSTANT VARCHAR2 (40) := UPPER ('queue_callback');
r_dequeue_options DBMS_AQ.DEQUEUE_OPTIONS_T;
r_message_properties DBMS_AQ.MESSAGE_PROPERTIES_T;
v_message_handle RAW(16);
o_payload RESV_DETAIL;
BEGIN
r_dequeue_options.msgid := descr.msg_id;
r_dequeue_options.consumer_name := descr.consumer_name;
DBMS_AQ.DEQUEUE(
queue_name => descr.queue_name,
dequeue_options => r_dequeue_options,
message_properties => r_message_properties,
payload => o_payload,
msgid => v_message_handle
-- Call procedure to load data from reservation database to Reporting DB through the DB link
dlex_report.dlex_data_load.load_reservation
( in_resvcode => o_payload.resv_code,
in_resvHistorySequence => o_payload.resv_history_sequence );
COMMIT;
END queue_callback;
- I noticed that messages are not taken out of the 2nd queue,
I guess I would need to use the REMOVE option to delete messages from the queue?
Would this be a large source of performance degradation after just a few thousand messages?
- The data load through the DB may be a little bit intensive but I feel that doing things in parallel would help.
I would like to understand if Oracle has a way of dequeuing in parallel (with or without the use of notification)
In the case of multiple subscribers with notification , does 'job_queue_processes' value has an impact on the degree of parallelism? If not what setting has?
And is there a way supplied by Oracle to set the queue to notify only one subscriber per message?
Your advice would be very much appreciated
Philippe
Edited by: user528100 on Feb 23, 2009 8:14 AM

Security issue when mi server interacts with multiple backend.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for