Send Timesheet Locked/Disabled for Resource
A resource's timesheet has been disabled/locked in the periods that he's missed. He did not have this issue about two weeks ago submitting missed timesheets. As of today, the send timesheet button is disabled/greyed out. The send status however is available.
I tried deleting/recreating timesheet but still does not work on all of them. Please note that when I recreate the timesheet it automatically adds the 40 hours for the week, is that normal? I have checked and periods are OPEN for these weeks. I am running
out of ideas of why this is causing his timesheets to not send. A while back, he had an error on a timesheet that I recently rejected and deleted/recreated if that provides any hints.
Regards,
John
Johnny Eltawn, Project Server Admin
Seems this is bug in MSPS 2013, you can Recall TS to
Identify
Assignment rejected task
by process status as "Rejected" and the it's cells in the Task Entry
grid would be read-only, As temporary workaround you can select that task and
click on “Remove Task” from option Ribbon.
Now you would be able to submit timesheet without any error.
Hope this will help you
Raushan Kumar |LinkedIn
Similar Messages
-
E61 defect. Sending SMS locks UI for 20-30s.
BEHAVIOUR
o Sending SMS locks UI for 20-30s.
o Sending progress indicator is displayed for entire time
o UI and progress indicator thread blocked & not-updated for >5s.
o Task button still functional
BACKGROUND
o E61 used heavily for 2-3 months
o 1.0610.04.04 / 19-04-06 / RM-89
o General degradation in SMS send use-case.
PRE-CONDITION
o SMS mailbox has a high-water mark of ~500 recevied,~500 sent.
o Defect still reproduceable even if inbox/outbox reduced to 100Hi,
This is the documentation that suits your CE7.2 version:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwce72/helpdata/en/89/c5fd430b63c74bbdfaa5f2ec9bb20b/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwce72/helpdata/en/44/bf8f2069665991e10000000a422035/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwce72/helpdata/en/48/b37e32eb5c6200e10000000a421937/frameset.htm
Good luck,
B.
Edited by: Benjamin L.F. Houttuin on Dec 14, 2010 12:54 PM -
Sender Radio Button disabled for Idoc adapter
If u clearly observe .......
Whats the necessity or significance of not having a sender communication channel(sender side radio button is disabled) and sender agreement in scenarios pertaining to Idocs....Hi Deepika,
Just think that IDOC adapter as a sender, that means, you are getting source file (IDOC) from R/3 (SAP) system definitely. And XI is also and SAP system. As both are SAP systems, we already have a way of establishing the connection between SAP systems, which is ALE configuration. Using which, you can easily transfer IDOC from R/3 to XI.
Also, you might know that IDOC and HTTP adapters reside on ABAP stack. When the R/3 and XI configuration settings are done, XI can receive the IDOC sent by R/3, directly to Integration Engine instead of Adapter Engine. If the file initially reaches to Adapter Engine, then the details about sender application are necessary, that means the Sender Agreement. But in this case, you don't even need the Sender Agreement.
I hope you understand why the IDOC sender button is disabled and sender agreement is not necessary.
Thank you.
Regards
Bhanu
Intelligroup. -
Send option not available for Resources
My customer has reported an issue with a pair of GroupWise resource(s).
Basically the "Send" button is not available when the owner is logged in and trying to send message, only the "Post" option is available. From reports it appears that it is displaying messages as posted notes, instead of messages.
I hope that I'm explaining this issue correctly, if additional information is needed please let me know.
-DIn article <[email protected]>, Dschaldenovell
wrote:
> a pair of GroupWise resource(s).
> Basically the "Send" button is not available when the owner is logged in
> and trying to send message, only the "Post" option is available. From
> reports it appears that it is displaying messages as posted notes,
> instead of messages.
Has this worked before? With other resources?
Are these new resources or ones that have been around a while?
Are both accessed from the same client or from different ones?
Are there regular scheduled GWChecks run on this system? Analyze/fix for
Structure and another for Contents?
Which version is the POA and the client(s) in question?
Andy of
KonecnyConsulting.ca in Toronto
Knowledge Partner
http://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=75037
If you find a post helpful and are logged in the Web interface, please
show your appreciation by clicking on the star below. Thanks! -
We would like to create a PDF form to collect sensitive information (phone numbers, payment information) from our customers. Ideally, we would like for them to be able to fill it out, then hit a button to encrypt it when completed, and send it back to us for us to view. Kind of like sending out an open, self-locking box for them to fill, and once they close it no one can see the contents without the key (which we would have).
I’m using Adobe Acrobat Pro XI (11.0.07) on Mac OSX (10.9.4).
Is this possible? If so, how do I do this? Thank you in advance!You can use certificate encryption. Each of your customers needs to have a digital certificate with a private key and send you the public key version of his/her certificate. You also need to have a digital certificate with private key and to send each customer the public version of your certificate. Then after each customer fills in your form, she encrypts it with certificate encryption entering as recipients herself and you before sending this PDF to you. This way only this particular customer and you can open and see PDF filled with sensitive information.
This workflow presumes that you and each of your customers can procure a digital certificate (Digital ID in Acrobat-speak). -
Hello, In Lion 10.7.x I cannot disable the Lock documents for 2 weeks in Time Machine! Thus it prevents to change anything else like the system preferences or other settings. All is locked. How I can disable it?
Do you mean the check box isn't enabled?
Or you remove the check but it doesn't "stick"?
Or you remove the box but documents are stil getting locked?
That setting doesn't apply to other things in System Preferences, just apps that support AutoSave and Versions. If you're having a problem with System Prefs, please clarify exactly what. -
hello, my ipod got disabled for years. Right now its disabled for 22,817,472. I asked around and people said to just restore it on itunes. But when i plug it in it says that it cant connect it the ipod because its locked with a passcode. Someone please please help me!!!!
Locked Out, Forgot Lock or Restrictions Passcode, or Need to Restore Your Device
1. iOS- Forgotten passcode or device disabled after entering wrong passcode
2. iPhone, iPad, iPod touch: Wrong passcode results in red disabled screen
3. Restoring iPod touch after forgotten passcode
4. What to Do If You've Forgotten Your iPhone's Passcode
5. iOS- Understanding passcodes
6. iTunes 10 for Mac- Update and restore software on iPod, iPhone, or iPad
Forgotten Restrictions Passcode Help
You will need to restore your device as New to remove a Restrictions passcode. Go through the normal process to restore your device, but when you see the options to restore as New or from a backup, be sure to choose New.
Also, see iTunes- Restoring iOS software. -
My iPad from school is locked, I haven't yet synced it with my laptop and it is disabled for an hour and there is definately a number 7 in it....HELP!!!
Sorry, no one here can help you remember your passcode.
-
My ipod has been disabled for 22,777,704 mintues and when i try to restore it is says it cant be restored because the ipod is locked. there is no where to enter the password. i font have the computer it was originally synced with. help please!!
Hi saraali,
Follow the instructions in the support article link below that best apply to your situation:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1212
Cheers,
GB -
Why is 'send' disabled for sending a message on my iPod touch?
I can receive messages, browse the net, connect to iTunes so there is nothing wrong with my connection settings. I also have the latest iOS installed. I can type a response to a message, but can't send because the send button is disabled.
Is iMessage activated in Settings/Messages?
-
Re: Transactions and Locking Rows for Update
Dale,
Sounds like you either need an "optimistic locking" scheme, usually
implemented with timestamps at the database level, or a concurrency manager.
A concurrency manager registers objects that may be of interest to multiple
users in a central location. It takes care of notifying interested parties
(i.e., clients,) of changes made to those objects, using a "notifier" pattern.
The optimistic locking scheme is relatively easy to implement at the
database level, but introduces several problems. One problem is that the
first person to save their changes "wins" - every one else has to discard
their changes. Also, you now have business policy effectively embedded in
the database.
The concurrency manager is much more flexible, and keeps the policy where
it probably belongs. However, it is more complex, and there are some
implications to performance when you get to the multiple-thousand-user
range because of its event-based nature.
Another pattern of lock management that has been implemented is a
"key-based" lock manager that does not use events, and may be more
effective at managing this type of concurrency for large numbers of users.
There are too many details to go into here, but I may be able to give you
more ideas in a separate note, if you want.
Don
At 04:48 PM 6/5/97 PDT, Dale "V." Georg wrote:
I have a problem in the application I am currently working on, which it
seems to me should be easily solvable via appropriate use of transactions
and database locking, but I'm having trouble figuring out exactly how to
do it. The database we are using is Oracle 7.2.
The scenario is as follows: We have a window where the user picks an
object from a dropdown list. Some of the object's attributes are then
displayed in that window, and the user then has the option of editing
those attributes, and at some point hitting the equivalent of a 'save'button
to write the changes back to the database. So far, so good. Now
introduce a second user. If user #1 and user #2 both happen to pull up
the same object and start making changes to it, user #1 could write back
to the database and then 15 seconds later user #2 could write back to the
database, completely overlaying user #1's changes without ever knowing
they had happened. This is not good, particularly for our application
where editing the object causes it to progress from one state to the next,
and multiple users trying to edit it at the same time spells disaster.
The first thing that came to mind was to do a select with intent to update,
i.e. 'select * from table where key = 'somevalue' with update'. This way
the next user to try to select from the table using the same key would not
be able to get it. This would prevent multiple users from being able to
pull the same object up on their screens at the same time. Unfortunately,
I can think of a number of problems with this approach.
For one thing, the lock is only held for the duration of the transaction, so
I would have to open a Forte transaction, do the select with intent to
update, let the user modify the object, then when they saved it back again
end the transaction. Since a window is driven by the event loop I can't
think of any way to start a transaction, let the user interact with the
window, then end the transaction, short of closing and re-opening the
window. This would imply having a separate window specifically for
updating the object, and then wrapping the whole of that window's event
loop in a transaction. This would be a different interface than we wanted
to present to the users, but it might still work if not for the next issue.
The second problem is that we are using a pooled DBSession approach
to connecting to the database. There is a single Oracle login account
which none of the users know the password to, and thus the users
simply share DBSession resources. If one user starts a transaction
and does a select with intent to update on one DBSession, then another
user starts a transaction and tries to do the same thing on the same
DBSession, then the second user will get an error out of Oracle because
there's already an open transaction on that DBSession.
At this point, I am still tossing ideas around in my head, but after
speaking with our Oracle/Forte admin here, we came to the conclusion
that somebody must have had to address these issues before, so I
thought I'd toss it out and see what came back.
Thanks in advance for any ideas!
Dale V. Georg
Indus Consultancy Services [email protected]
Mack Trucks, Inc. [email protected]
>
>
>
>
====================================
Don Nelson
Senior Consultant
Forte Software, Inc.
Denver, CO
Corporate voice mail: 510-986-3810
aka: [email protected]
====================================
"I think nighttime is dark so you can imagine your fears with less
distraction." - CalvinWe have taken an optimistic data locking approach. Retrieved values are
stored as initial values; changes are stored seperately. During update, key
value(s) or the entire retieved set is used in a where criteria to validate
that the data set is still in the initial state. This allows good decoupling
of the data access layer. However, optimistic locking allows multiple users
to access the same data set at the same time, but then only one can save
changes, the rest would get an error message that the data had changed. We
haven't had any need to use a pessimistic lock.
Pessimistic locking usually involves some form of open session or DBMS level
lock, which we haven't implemented for performance reasons. If we do find the
need for a pessimistic lock, we will probably use cached data sets that are
checked first, and returned as read-only if already in the cache.
-DFR
Dale V. Georg <[email protected]> on 06/05/97 03:25:02 PM
To: Forte User Group <[email protected]> @ INTERNET
cc: Richards* Debbie <[email protected]> @ INTERNET, Gardner*
Steve <[email protected]> @ INTERNET
Subject: Transactions and Locking Rows for Update
I have a problem in the application I am currently working on, which it
seems to me should be easily solvable via appropriate use of transactions
and database locking, but I'm having trouble figuring out exactly how to
do it. The database we are using is Oracle 7.2.
The scenario is as follows: We have a window where the user picks an
object from a dropdown list. Some of the object's attributes are then
displayed in that window, and the user then has the option of editing
those attributes, and at some point hitting the equivalent of a 'save' button
to write the changes back to the database. So far, so good. Now
introduce a second user. If user #1 and user #2 both happen to pull up
the same object and start making changes to it, user #1 could write back
to the database and then 15 seconds later user #2 could write back to the
database, completely overlaying user #1's changes without ever knowing
they had happened. This is not good, particularly for our application
where editing the object causes it to progress from one state to the next,
and multiple users trying to edit it at the same time spells disaster.
The first thing that came to mind was to do a select with intent to update,
i.e. 'select * from table where key = 'somevalue' with update'. This way
the next user to try to select from the table using the same key would not
be able to get it. This would prevent multiple users from being able to
pull the same object up on their screens at the same time. Unfortunately,
I can think of a number of problems with this approach.
For one thing, the lock is only held for the duration of the transaction, so
I would have to open a Forte transaction, do the select with intent to
update, let the user modify the object, then when they saved it back again
end the transaction. Since a window is driven by the event loop I can't
think of any way to start a transaction, let the user interact with the
window, then end the transaction, short of closing and re-opening the
window. This would imply having a separate window specifically for
updating the object, and then wrapping the whole of that window's event
loop in a transaction. This would be a different interface than we wanted
to present to the users, but it might still work if not for the next issue.
The second problem is that we are using a pooled DBSession approach
to connecting to the database. There is a single Oracle login account
which none of the users know the password to, and thus the users
simply share DBSession resources. If one user starts a transaction
and does a select with intent to update on one DBSession, then another
user starts a transaction and tries to do the same thing on the same
DBSession, then the second user will get an error out of Oracle because
there's already an open transaction on that DBSession.
At this point, I am still tossing ideas around in my head, but after
speaking with our Oracle/Forte admin here, we came to the conclusion
that somebody must have had to address these issues before, so I
thought I'd toss it out and see what came back.
Thanks in advance for
any
ideas!
Dale V. Georg
Indus Consultancy Services [email protected]
Mack Trucks, Inc. [email protected]
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from pebble.Sagesoln.com by notes.bsginc.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9c for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1997Jun05.162418.1771.334203; Thu, 05 Jun 1997 16:24:19 -0500
Received: (from sync@localhost) by pebble.Sagesoln.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id
NAA11825 for forte-users-outgoing; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 13:47:58 -0700
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by pebble.Sagesoln.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id
NAA11819 for <[email protected]>; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 13:47:56 -0700
Received: from unknown(207.159.84.4) by pebble.sagesoln.com via smap (V1.3)
id sma011817; Thu Jun 5 13:47:43 1997
Received: from tes0001.macktrucks.com by relay.macktrucks.com
via smtpd (for pebble.sagesoln.com [206.80.24.108]) with SMTP; 5 Jun
1997 19:35:31 UT
Received: from dale by tes0001.macktrucks.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
id QAA04637; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 16:45:51 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Priority: Normal
To: Forte User Group <[email protected]>
Cc: "Richards," Debbie <[email protected]>,
"Gardner," Steve <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Dale "V." Georg <[email protected]>
Subject: Transactions and Locking Rows for Update
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 97 16:48:37 PDT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; X-MAPIextension=".TXT"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Dale "V." Georg <[email protected]> -
Getting deadlock detected while waiting for resource error for select Query.....
Hi all,
i am getting a below error whenever executing the below select query....
some times it will show dead lock detected while waiting for resource and terminated...
some times it executes and gives result..
but all the time it writes an alert to alert log
Plesae suggest how to resolve the issue..........
Thanks in advance
Env: Linux / Oracle 11.2.0.3.3
Error from alert log:
Errors in file /u01/oracle/oracle/diag/rdbms/bdrdb/bdrdb/trace/bdrdb_p017_6076.trc:
ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource
ORA-10387: parallel query server interrupt (normal)
Trace file info... bdrdb_p017_6076.trc:
Trace file /u01/oracle/oracle/diag/rdbms/bdrdb/bdrdb/trace/bdrdb_p017_6076.trc
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
ORACLE_HOME = /u01/oracle/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1
System name: Linux
Node name: bdrdb.cteplindia.com
Release: 2.6.18-308.el5PAE
Version: #1 SMP Fri Jan 27 17:40:09 EST 2012
Machine: i686
Instance name: bdrdb
Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
Oracle process number: 92
Unix process pid: 6076, image: [email protected] (P017)
*** 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
*** SESSION ID:(423.59970) 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
*** CLIENT ID:() 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
*** SERVICE NAME:(bdrdb) 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
*** MODULE NAME:() 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
*** ACTION NAME:() 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
*** 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
DEADLOCK DETECTED ( ORA-00060 )
[Transaction Deadlock]
Deadlock graph:
---------Blocker(s)-------- ---------Waiter(s)---------
Resource Name process session holds waits process session holds waits
PS-00000001-00000011 92 423 S 33 128 S X
BF-2ed08c01-00000000 33 128 S 92 423 S X
session 423: DID 0001-005C-00081126 session 128: DID 0001-0021-00067D23
session 128: DID 0001-0021-00067D23 session 423: DID 0001-005C-00081126
DEADLOCK DETECTED ( ORA-00060 )
[Transaction Deadlock]
Deadlock graph:
---------Blocker(s)-------- ---------Waiter(s)---------
Resource Name process session holds waits process session holds waits
PS-00000001-00000011 92 423 S 33 128 S X
BF-2ed08c01-00000000 33 128 S 92 423 S X
session 423: DID 0001-005C-00081126 session 128: DID 0001-0021-00067D23
session 128: DID 0001-0021-00067D23 session 423: DID 0001-005C-00081126
Rows waited on:
Session 423: no row
Session 128: obj - rowid = 00021DC1 - AAAh3BAAVAAAQL/AAA
(dictionary objn - 138689, file - 21, block - 66303, slot - 0)
----- Information for the OTHER waiting sessions -----
Session 128:
sid: 128 ser: 46176 audsid: 1836857 user: 102/DBLOCAL
flags: (0x8000041) USR/- flags_idl: (0x1) BSY/-/-/-/-/-
flags2: (0x40009) -/-/INC
pid: 33 O/S info: user: oracle, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 31611
image: [email protected]
client details:
O/S info: user: masked, term: masked, ospid: 5924:568
machine: masked program: Toad.exe
application name: TOAD background query session, hash value=526966934
current SQL:
application name: TOAD background query session, hash value=526966934
current SQL:
SELECT DISTINCT B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID
FROM B_FP_TEST,
B_USER_INFO,
J_FP_INVESTIGATOR,
L_TEST_STATUS,
L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE,
j_op_test_anml
WHERE B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID = J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.TEST_ID
AND B_FP_TEST.TEST_TYPE_ID = L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID
AND B_USER_INFO.B_USER_INFO_ID = J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.INVESTIGATOR_ID
AND B_FP_TEST.STATUS_ID = L_TEST_STATUS.STATUS_ID
AND B_FP_TEST.IS_DELETED = :"SYS_B_00"
AND B_FP_TEST.TEST_NUM NOT IN (:"SYS_B_01", :"SYS_B_02", :"SYS_B_03")
AND L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.IS_DELETED = :"SYS_B_04"
AND J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.is_pi = :"SYS_B_05"
AND L_TEST_STATUS.STATUS IN (:"SYS_B_06", :"SYS_B_07", :"SYS_B_08")
AND j_op_test_anml.test_id = B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID
----- End of information for the OTHER waiting sessions -----
*** 2013-11-04 23:18:57.916
dbkedDefDump(): Starting a non-incident diagnostic dump (flags=0x0, level=3, mask=0x0)
----- Error Stack Dump -----
ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource
ORA-10387: parallel query server interrupt (normal)
----- SQL Statement (None) -----
Current SQL information unavailable - no cursor.
----- Call Stack Trace -----
calling call entry argument values in hex
location type point (? means dubious value)
More......
Query:
SELECT DISTINCT B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID
FROM B_FP_TEST,
B_USER_INFO,
J_FP_INVESTIGATOR,
L_TEST_STATUS,
L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE,
j_op_test_anml
WHERE B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID = J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.TEST_ID
AND B_FP_TEST.TEST_TYPE_ID = L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID
AND B_USER_INFO.B_USER_INFO_ID = J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.INVESTIGATOR_ID
AND B_FP_TEST.STATUS_ID = L_TEST_STATUS.STATUS_ID
AND B_FP_TEST.IS_DELETED = 0
AND B_FP_TEST.TEST_NUM NOT IN (1, 2, 99)
AND L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.IS_DELETED = 0
AND J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.is_pi = 1
AND L_TEST_STATUS.STATUS IN ('Scheduled', 'In-Progress', 'Completed')
AND j_op_test_anml.test_id = B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID
AND ( (j_op_test_anml.end_date BETWEEN TO_DATE ('28-Oct-2013') - 1
AND TO_DATE ('04-Nov-2013') + 1)
OR (j_op_test_anml.start_date BETWEEN TO_DATE ('28-Oct-2013') - 1
AND TO_DATE ('04-Nov-2013') + 1)
OR (TO_DATE ('28-Oct-2013') BETWEEN j_op_test_anml.start_date
AND j_op_test_anml.end_date)
OR (TO_DATE ('04-Nov-2013') BETWEEN j_op_test_anml.start_date
AND j_op_test_anml.end_date))
AND L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.IS_DELETED = 0
AND B_FP_TEST.DATASOURCE_ID = 9
Query Exp plan:
Plan hash value: 3398228788
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop | TQ |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1501 | 102K| 1929 (1)| 00:00:24 | | | | | |
| 1 | HASH UNIQUE | | 1501 | 102K| 1929 (1)| 00:00:24 | | | | | |
| 2 | CONCATENATION | | | | | | | | | | |
| 3 | PX COORDINATOR | | | | | | | | | | |
| 4 | PX SEND QC (RANDOM) | :TQ30005 | 241 | 16870 | 800 (1)| 00:00:10 | | | Q3,05 | P->S | QC (RAND) |
|* 5 | HASH JOIN | | 241 | 16870 | 800 (1)| 00:00:10 | | | Q3,05 | PCWP | |
| 6 | PX RECEIVE | | 246 | 15990 | 797 (1)| 00:00:10 | | | Q3,05 | PCWP | |
| 7 | PX SEND HASH | :TQ30004 | 246 | 15990 | 797 (1)| 00:00:10 | | | Q3,04 | P->P | HASH |
|* 8 | HASH JOIN | | 246 | 15990 | 797 (1)| 00:00:10 | | | Q3,04 | PCWP | |
| 9 | PX RECEIVE | | 573 | 29223 | 793 (1)| 00:00:10 | | | Q3,04 | PCWP | |
| 10 | PX SEND HASH | :TQ30003 | 573 | 29223 | 793 (1)| 00:00:10 | | | Q3,03 | P->P | HASH |
|* 11 | HASH JOIN | | 573 | 29223 | 793 (1)| 00:00:10 | | | Q3,03 | PCWP | |
| 12 | BUFFER SORT | | | | | | | | Q3,03 | PCWC | |
| 13 | PX RECEIVE | | | | | | | | Q3,03 | PCWP | |
| 14 | PX SEND BROADCAST | :TQ30000 | | | | | | | | S->P | BROADCAST |
| 15 | NESTED LOOPS | | | | | | | | | | |
| 16 | NESTED LOOPS | | 485 | 20855 | 781 (0)| 00:00:10 | | | | | |
| 17 | TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID| J_OP_TEST_ANML | 485 | 10185 | 296 (0)| 00:00:04 | ROWID | ROWID | | | |
|* 18 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX$$_2D190001 | 485 | | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
|* 19 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | FT_TEST_ID_PK | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
|* 20 | TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID | B_FP_TEST | 1 | 22 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID | | | |
| 21 | PX BLOCK ITERATOR | | 70382 | 549K| 11 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q3,03 | PCWC | |
|* 22 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | J_FP_INVESTIGATOR | 70382 | 549K| 11 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q3,03 | PCWP | |
| 23 | BUFFER SORT | | | | | | | | Q3,04 | PCWC | |
| 24 | PX RECEIVE | | 3 | 42 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q3,04 | PCWP | |
| 25 | PX SEND HASH | :TQ30001 | 3 | 42 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | S->P | HASH |
|* 26 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | L_TEST_STATUS | 3 | 42 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
| 27 | BUFFER SORT | | | | | | | | Q3,05 | PCWC | |
| 28 | PX RECEIVE | | 30 | 150 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q3,05 | PCWP | |
| 29 | PX SEND HASH | :TQ30002 | 30 | 150 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | S->P | HASH |
|* 30 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE | 30 | 150 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
| 31 | NESTED LOOPS | | | | | | | | | | |
| 32 | NESTED LOOPS | | 3 | 210 | 329 (1)| 00:00:04 | | | | | |
| 33 | NESTED LOOPS | | 3 | 195 | 329 (1)| 00:00:04 | | | | | |
|* 34 | HASH JOIN | | 2 | 114 | 325 (1)| 00:00:04 | | | | | |
| 35 | NESTED LOOPS | | | | | | | | | | |
| 36 | NESTED LOOPS | | 6 | 258 | 322 (1)| 00:00:04 | | | | | |
| 37 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE | | 6 | 126 | 316 (1)| 00:00:04 | 7 | 7 | | | |
|* 38 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | J_OP_TEST_ANML | 6 | 126 | 316 (1)| 00:00:04 | 7 | 7 | | | |
|* 39 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | FT_TEST_ID_PK | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
|* 40 | TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID | B_FP_TEST | 1 | 22 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID | | | |
|* 41 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | L_TEST_STATUS | 3 | 42 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
|* 42 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | J_FP_INVESTIGATOR | 1 | 8 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
|* 43 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | FI_TEST_ID_PK | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
|* 44 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE_PK | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
|* 45 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE | 1 | 5 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
| 46 | PX COORDINATOR | | | | | | | | | | |
| 47 | PX SEND QC (RANDOM) | :TQ20003 | | | | | | | Q2,03 | P->S | QC (RAND) |
| 48 | NESTED LOOPS | | | | | | | | Q2,03 | PCWP | |
| 49 | NESTED LOOPS | | 33 | 2310 | 399 (2)| 00:00:05 | | | Q2,03 | PCWP | |
|* 50 | HASH JOIN | | 33 | 2145 | 397 (2)| 00:00:05 | | | Q2,03 | PCWP | |
| 51 | PX RECEIVE | | 78 | 3978 | 393 (1)| 00:00:05 | | | Q2,03 | PCWP | |
| 52 | PX SEND HASH | :TQ20002 | 78 | 3978 | 393 (1)| 00:00:05 | | | Q2,02 | P->P | HASH |
|* 53 | HASH JOIN | | 78 | 3978 | 393 (1)| 00:00:05 | | | Q2,02 | PCWP | |
| 54 | BUFFER SORT | | | | | | | | Q2,02 | PCWC | |
| 55 | PX RECEIVE | | | | | | | | Q2,02 | PCWP | |
| 56 | PX SEND BROADCAST | :TQ20000 | | | | | | | | S->P | BROADCAST |
| 57 | NESTED LOOPS | | | | | | | | | | |
| 58 | NESTED LOOPS | | 66 | 2838 | 382 (1)| 00:00:05 | | | | | |
| 59 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE | | 66 | 1386 | 316 (1)| 00:00:04 | 7 | 7 | | | |
|* 60 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | J_OP_TEST_ANML | 66 | 1386 | 316 (1)| 00:00:04 | 7 | 7 | | | |
|* 61 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | FT_TEST_ID_PK | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
|* 62 | TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID | B_FP_TEST | 1 | 22 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID | | | |
| 63 | PX BLOCK ITERATOR | | 70382 | 549K| 11 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q2,02 | PCWC | |
|* 64 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | J_FP_INVESTIGATOR | 70382 | 549K| 11 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q2,02 | PCWP | |
| 65 | BUFFER SORT | | | | | | | | Q2,03 | PCWC | |
| 66 | PX RECEIVE | | 3 | 42 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q2,03 | PCWP | |
| 67 | PX SEND HASH | :TQ20001 | 3 | 42 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | S->P | HASH |
|* 68 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | L_TEST_STATUS | 3 | 42 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
|* 69 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE_PK | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q2,03 | PCWP | |
|* 70 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE | 1 | 5 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q2,03 | PCWP | |
| 71 | PX COORDINATOR | | | | | | | | | | |
| 72 | PX SEND QC (RANDOM) | :TQ10003 | | | | | | | Q1,03 | P->S | QC (RAND) |
| 73 | NESTED LOOPS | | | | | | | | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
| 74 | NESTED LOOPS | | 33 | 2310 | 399 (2)| 00:00:05 | | | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
|* 75 | HASH JOIN | | 34 | 2210 | 397 (2)| 00:00:05 | | | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
| 76 | PX RECEIVE | | 78 | 3978 | 393 (1)| 00:00:05 | | | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
| 77 | PX SEND HASH | :TQ10002 | 78 | 3978 | 393 (1)| 00:00:05 | | | Q1,02 | P->P | HASH |
|* 78 | HASH JOIN | | 78 | 3978 | 393 (1)| 00:00:05 | | | Q1,02 | PCWP | |
| 79 | BUFFER SORT | | | | | | | | Q1,02 | PCWC | |
| 80 | PX RECEIVE | | | | | | | | Q1,02 | PCWP | |
| 81 | PX SEND BROADCAST | :TQ10000 | | | | | | | | S->P | BROADCAST |
| 82 | NESTED LOOPS | | | | | | | | | | |
| 83 | NESTED LOOPS | | 66 | 2838 | 382 (1)| 00:00:05 | | | | | |
| 84 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE | | 66 | 1386 | 316 (1)| 00:00:04 | 7 | 7 | | | |
|* 85 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | J_OP_TEST_ANML | 66 | 1386 | 316 (1)| 00:00:04 | 7 | 7 | | | |
|* 86 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | FT_TEST_ID_PK | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
|* 87 | TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID | B_FP_TEST | 1 | 22 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID | | | |
| 88 | PX BLOCK ITERATOR | | 70382 | 549K| 11 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q1,02 | PCWC | |
|* 89 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | J_FP_INVESTIGATOR | 70382 | 549K| 11 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q1,02 | PCWP | |
| 90 | BUFFER SORT | | | | | | | | Q1,03 | PCWC | |
| 91 | PX RECEIVE | | 3 | 42 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
| 92 | PX SEND HASH | :TQ10001 | 3 | 42 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | S->P | HASH |
|* 93 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | L_TEST_STATUS | 3 | 42 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | |
|* 94 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE_PK | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
|* 95 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE | 1 | 5 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
5 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_TYPE_ID"="L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID")
8 - access("B_FP_TEST"."STATUS_ID"="L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS_ID")
11 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID"="J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."TEST_ID")
18 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05
00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))
19 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."TEST_ID"="B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID")
20 - filter("B_FP_TEST"."DATASOURCE_ID"=9 AND "B_FP_TEST"."IS_DELETED"=0 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>1 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>2 AND
"B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>99)
22 - filter("J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."IS_PI"=1)
26 - filter("L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Completed' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='In-Progress' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Scheduled')
30 - filter("L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."IS_DELETED"=0)
34 - access("B_FP_TEST"."STATUS_ID"="L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS_ID")
38 - filter("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05
00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR
LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))))
39 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."TEST_ID"="B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID")
40 - filter("B_FP_TEST"."DATASOURCE_ID"=9 AND "B_FP_TEST"."IS_DELETED"=0 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>1 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>2 AND
"B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>99)
41 - filter("L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Completed' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='In-Progress' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Scheduled')
42 - filter("J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."IS_PI"=1)
43 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID"="J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."TEST_ID")
44 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_TYPE_ID"="L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID")
45 - filter("L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."IS_DELETED"=0)
50 - access("B_FP_TEST"."STATUS_ID"="L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS_ID")
53 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID"="J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."TEST_ID")
60 - filter("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-04 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-04
00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR
LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))) AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27
00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))))
61 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."TEST_ID"="B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID")
62 - filter("B_FP_TEST"."DATASOURCE_ID"=9 AND "B_FP_TEST"."IS_DELETED"=0 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>1 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>2 AND
"B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>99)
64 - filter("J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."IS_PI"=1)
68 - filter("L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Completed' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='In-Progress' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Scheduled')
69 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_TYPE_ID"="L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID")
70 - filter("L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."IS_DELETED"=0)
75 - access("B_FP_TEST"."STATUS_ID"="L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS_ID")
78 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID"="J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."TEST_ID")
85 - filter("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-28 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-28
00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-04 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR
LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-04 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))) AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27
00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))) AND
(LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05
00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))))
86 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."TEST_ID"="B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID")
87 - filter("B_FP_TEST"."DATASOURCE_ID"=9 AND "B_FP_TEST"."IS_DELETED"=0 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>1 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>2 AND
"B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>99)
89 - filter("J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."IS_PI"=1)
93 - filter("L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Completed' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='In-Progress' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Scheduled')
94 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_TYPE_ID"="L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID")
95 - filter("L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."IS_DELETED"=0)Excellent piece of follow-up on my first suggestion.
I nearly made a comment about how the plan doesn't show Bloom filter pruning either - and then I realised why not. The plan you've shown us comes from Explain Plan with literal values present; the trace file shows bind variables with names that are generated when cursor_sharing is set to force or similar - so the run-time plan and the plan from explain plan are almost guaranteed to be different.
Oracle support will need you to supply the plan you get from trying to run the query and then making a call to dbms_xplan.display_cursor() - dbms_xplan in 10g | Oracle Scratchpad If you do this I think you'll find that the pstart/pstop columns contain entries like :BF0000, and you may even find operations link PX JOIN FILTER CREATE / PX JOIN FILTER USE
A couple of generic notes:
if a query does sufficient work to merit parallel execution, then it's usually better to supply the best possible information to the optimizer, which means using literals rather than bind variables - you could try executing the query with the hint /*+ cursor_sharing_exact */ to stop Oracle from turning your literals into binds; it might be the presence of bind variables that's making the optimizer choose a path that has to include bloom filter pruning in your case.
Where you have the to_date() call you've used a four-digit year - which is a very good thing and helps the optimizer - but it's also a good idea to include an explicit format string as well: with a four-digit year this probably won't make any difference, but it avoids any risk of ambiguity for the optimizer.
I made a comment about the P->S stage and bottlenecks - I spent a couple more minutes looking at the plan, and I see the optimizer has used concatentation: in effect it has run three query blocks one after the other and fed the results to the query co-ordinator - in this case the P->S would make no difference to the end-user response time there's always a final P->S to the coordinator, you just happen to have three of them.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis -
ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource CLOSE cursor
Hi,
I am a new member of this forum. I am working with a problem we got a few weeks ago. It is from a Pro C batch executable running on 10 threads dealing with >800 data accessed from multiple tables. The error as reported came from a package.function call.
This is the error I encountered:
process_item~G****, D***~-60~ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource~PACKAGE ERROR = CLOSE cursor C_***** in package R***.I*** 7641
The cursor is a simple SELECT cursor without Table or Record locking.
My questions are:
*Upon the occurrence of this error, is the execution already at the CLOSE cursor line or did the error occurred between the OPEN cursor and the CLOSE cursor? There are several lines of code in between OPEN and CLOSE:
- one that calls for a package.function that simply stores parameter values to a variable
- another one which fetches the cursor. The group that holds the cursor values is only used by a single function in the package
*Is it possible for this CLOSE cursor to cause a deadlock? What could have caused this?
*From what I know, Oracle deals with deadlocks by aborting the deadlocking process while others continue, but this deadlock caused our program to hang. How is this possible? Could the root cause of the deadlock be from our threading program? This is a rare occurrence and happened only twice this year.
Thanks,
RafRaf Serrano wrote:
Hi,
I am a new member of this forum. I am working with a problem we got a few weeks ago. It is from a Pro C batch executable running on 10 threads dealing with >800 data accessed from multiple tables. The error as reported came from a package.function call.
This is the error I encountered:
process_item~G****, D***~-60~ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource~PACKAGE ERROR = CLOSE cursor C_***** in package R***.I*** 7641
The cursor is a simple SELECT cursor without Table or Record locking.
My questions are:
*Upon the occurrence of this error, is the execution already at the CLOSE cursor line or did the error occurred between the OPEN cursor and the CLOSE cursor? There are several lines of code in between OPEN and CLOSE:
- one that calls for a package.function that simply stores parameter values to a variable
- another one which fetches the cursor. The group that holds the cursor values is only used by a single function in the package
*Is it possible for this CLOSE cursor to cause a deadlock? What could have caused this?
*From what I know, Oracle deals with deadlocks by aborting the deadlocking process while others continue, but this deadlock caused our program to hang. How is this possible? Could the root cause of the deadlock be from our threading program? This is a rare occurrence and happened only twice this year.
Thanks,
RafSELECT (without FOR UPDATE) statements are never involved in ORA-00060.
only DML statements throw ORA-00060 error -
I seem to be stuck in apple ID ****. First the password was expired only two minutes after I finished setting up the account and then the new password was invalid. I don't know what to try next but this is making me crazy. And I'm locked out for eight hours for too many attempts at answering questions that I never set up in the first place. I don't know what gives but something is way off. I need to set up this iPad for work but I can't get past the login.
Place the iOS device in Recovery Mode and then connect to your computer and restore via iTunes. The iPod will be erased. Some glitch occured and you have to restore/erse the iPod. Y will have to restore from an existing backup if y ohave one.
iOS: Wrong passcode results in red disabled screen
If recovery mode does not work try DFU mode.
How to put iPod touch / iPhone into DFU mode « Karthik's scribblings
For how to restore:
iTunes: Restoring iOS software
To restore from backup see:
iOS: How to back up
If you restore from iCloud backup the apps will be automatically downloaded. If you restore from iTunes backup the apps and music have to be in the iTunes library since synced media like apps and music are not included in the backup of the iOS device that iTunes makes.
You can redownload most iTunes purchases by:
Downloading past purchases from the App Store, iBookstore, and iTunes Store -
I do a Google search it locks-up. Other times it locks up for no obvious reason. I am using Windows 7. I never have any problems with the latest version of 3.6.
Even if I shut it down, I cannot open it again without re-starting my computer. So for me right now the beta version is useless!!!Apple doesn't monitor all the threads, so the best thing to do is send in feedback:
http://www.apple.com/feedback/
Maybe you are looking for
-
Interactive ALV in webdynpro ABAP
I have a requirement where in, i have to show a report in ALV and on lead selection from ALV list i need to show another screen with some UI elements.Since i use view container elemnt it doesnt have required properties. Please help me to find out exi
-
Disable create button in ME23N
Hi Gurus, I have a requirement to disable 'create' button in ME23N screen. Can we acheive this by transaction variant? Appreciate if some body can explain the steps. Thanks Kala
-
HT1338 I have Mac OS 10.6.8, I can update to which next OS?
Which is the best OS update for my Mac with Mac OS 10.6.8?
-
Do buttons work in a MSO in a PDF folio, version 25?
I created a button within a Scrollable frame, which is part of an MSO. The button is a blank frame over text, and it's anchored to that text. The buttom simply goes to a page in the document. When I click on the text, nothing happens. What am I
-
Static html with url to apex pages
I have a table with html content that contains url's to apex pages similar to <a href="f?p=115:300:???:PAGE:::P300_PAGE_NAME:test_page>test page</a> <a href=f?p=115:300:???:PAGE:::P300_PAGE_NAME:another_test_page">another test page</a> Where ??? need