Sender System Error Handling

Dear Experts .
Is there a way to send a notification per Sender System Name when Errors occur ?
Thanks ,
NC.

Update :
I tried Following the B1iSNGuide05.pdf.
I'll try to elaborate my problem.
I have a F.AnySystem object as described in the file 2 db pdf.
I've created an object that creates Sap B1 8.8 Sales Draft from an xml provided by my BP.
sometimes the xml wouldn't go through due to various reasons (itemcode no valid , currency not updated etc etc.)
I've tried assigning an error action after configuring the Cfg EA: SendEmail, and Configuration of the Error Action QueueBlockerAlert
i've also configured : Configuration of email channel, used for all B1iSN Actions , and performed a test mail that was received properly.
After configuring the above I tried configuring the Assign Error Actions,
but I wasn't sure which settings are the right ones.
On Phase I tried Inbound Database Phase
Task : EASection_Add_when01
Sender System :0010000105_XMLTest (0010000105)
reciever system would stay :n.a when i click on the (...) button to the right. I tried inserting * on the rest of the settings but that didn't help with getting an error notification when it occurred .
If anyone could shade some light , give an example , I would appreciate it.
Thanks ,
NC.

Similar Messages

How to handle BEA-382108 error in route error handler?

Hi,
I have a proxy service with error handler at route level. when any wrong inputs are given to this proxy the Biz will generate fault with error as BEA-382108
having error message as XPATH can only be done for XML or MFL content. This is error is handled by system error handler but not by route error handler.
Can any tell me how to handle this error in route error handler...?

In route Error Handler.
Add If condition and add fn:contains($fault,"BEA-382108") in the if condition, and add your code/logic that you want to implement in case of this error in IF condiiton.
Let me know if this helps.
Regards,
Karan

Exception caught if error is raised in Service Error Handler

Can any one help me on this? Im not able to understand the funda for the behaviour?
Proxy Service A calls proxy service B using Publish action. In proxyservice B - service error handler, Im raising an error with customised message. Proxy service B routes to another proxy service C which routes to Business service.
If my business service gives me timed out , error is handled at Proxy service C error handler , and again Proxy Service B error handler is invoked. Here my code stops where Im raising the error.
When I raise error in Service Handler where it is being caught?
Thank you in advance.
Regards,
Vyshnavi

Hi Vyshnavi,
There are four levels where you may define an Error Handler and it will catch errors related to this level only. If it could not handle any error reached to it, it will propagate the error to the higher level error handler. All errors which can not be handled at lower levels, System Error Handler, handles those.
To know more about this, please refer -
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E13159_01/osb/docs10gr3/userguide/modelingmessageflow.html#wp1040161
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E13159_01/osb/docs10gr3/userguide/modelingmessageflow.html#wp1128288
Regards,
Anuj

Error Handling in BPM - Send Step

Hello,
I would like to implement the following two error handlers using BPM:
1. There is a send step which sends a message to an HTTP receiver. If the HTTP server is down I would like to add 3 retries and just in case after the third retry fails there should be an error Email sent. So I am wondering whether a communication error (which happens in the HTTP receiver communication channel) is delivered back to the process engine so that it can be handled using BPM.
2. I also need to apply a validation using XML schema. So if validation fails the error should also be returned to the process engine so that it can be handled in the integration process.
Are those two requirement possible as described (returning communication and validation errors)? Or do I have to follow another approach?
Thank you very much!

Hi Florian,
>>2. When I activate transport acknowledgement and there is an error in XML validation outbound channel request I get an system error acknowledgement back however the error branch is NOT taken either!
Correct send step using transport acknowledgment will check whether the message was transmitted or not
Check this link http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/EN/43/65ce41ae343e2be10000000a1553f6/content.htm
>>3. And NOW it gets interesting: When I simulate step 2 again an cancel the error message afterwards then the error branch is taken! Not very useful in my opinion if error messages have to be canceled first. The error branch seems to be pretty useless for me in case of asynchronous send steps.
Again when you cancelled the message it was not received successfully by the receiver system and hence it raised exception (as mentioned in the Exception of send step.)
I will suggest you to try using Application Acknowledgment in send step. Also If you provide the steps of BPM then it will be more helpful.
Also have a look at this :
Asynchronous send step can raise exception only when
1. Thrown when a permanent system error occurs:
a. In the case of an asynchronous send step, the exception will only be triggered if an error occurs during the transfer to the pipeline. Errors that occur during mapping in the pipeline, do not trigger an exception.
b . In the case of a synchronous send step, the exception is also triggered by permanent system errors that occur in the pipeline or while transporting the message to or from the pipeline.
Regards
Suraj
Edited by: S.R.Suraj on Sep 8, 2009 6:41 AM

How to handle system errors in XI using BPM? please help!

Hi Experts,
I have a requirement where I have to handle system errors. For example when I am making RFC call using RFC adapter if the remote destination is down then I have create a understandable error message and store it in another SAP table.
How to handle it? I am using BPM. I can see that there is "Exceptions" in the send step. How to use this?
Thanks
Gopal

Hi Gopalkrishna,
In this case whenever you get Mapping Exception , you can raise an Exception with the help of BPM and you can send the status to the RFC. But with the help of BPM.
For a Simple case refer:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/33/4a773f12f14a18e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
If you want you can do it without a BPM
and throw an exception in case any of the values is missing:
have a look at this weblog on how to throw exceptions
in a nice way:
/people/alessandro.guarneri/blog/2006/01/26/throwing-smart-exceptions-in-xi-graphical-mapping
Also just go through <a href="/people/sap.user72/blog/2005/02/23/raising-exceptions-in-sap-xi-mapping Exceptions in SAP XI Mapping</a> and see if it helps you solve the problem.
Also go through these links:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/dc/6b7f2243d711d1893e0000e8323c4f/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/68/253239bd1fa74ee10000000a114084/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/cf/f2bbc8142c11d3b93a0000e8353423/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/5d/2166e6a91d11d188de0000e8216438/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/05/bb223905b61b0ae10000000a11402f/content.htm
Please do let know if it helped.
Regards,
Abhy

Error handling : File( sender and receiver)

Hi Experts,
This is regarding some information i require in the Error Handling mechanisms we can use while picking up the file through File Sender Adapter and while placing the same on the receiver adapter :
Scenarios like :
a) Validations we can put , on the file , should that be done in SAP XI or after placing in SAP ERP.
b) If the file is of a different format and isnt picked up how can that be handled ? ]
c) if the File contains wrong data , should the alert be generated in SAP or SAP XI ?
d) If the file does not arrive in the folder itself what is the error handling meachanism ?
e) diff
thanks
Dev

a) Validations we can put , on the file , should that be done in SAP XI or after placing in SAP ERP
Do validations on File mean perform a check on the file for its contents, format, structure? If yes, then these are performed in XI/ PI
b) If the file is of a different format and isnt picked up how can that be handled ?
The file channel will throw an error if it is not able to find the file (specified in sender channel) during its poll interval.
c) if the File contains wrong data , should the alert be generated in SAP or SAP XI ?
If SAP is the target system, then better the check and alert be done in SAP XI/ PI, as far as possible we should avoid sending wrong data to the target.
d) If the file does not arrive in the folder itself what is the error handling meachanism ?
Which folder are you talking about? If it is source folder then the error will be thrown as mentioned in point b.
If it is target folder, then the error (if any) will be captured either in IE or AE of SAP XI/ PI and can be intimated using alerts.
Regards,
Abhishek.

Handle system errors in BPM

I'm working on a BPM that may fail to perform some steps due to system errors. I can raise an exception if that happens, but what I'd like to do in the exception branch is to build a response message to the calling application that starts the BPM, declaring the reasons of the error. I can do that giving a generic "system error" description, but I'd like to be more precise, and access the system error cause itself and add it to the message description.
Is this possible? How to make it?
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
As per my knowledge we can raise System errors using Send step and Transformation Step.I dont think we can rise System errors using Control step.Control Step handles only Exceptions not System errors.(Confirm once).
But if you want to rise System errors go for Send Step Synchronous or Asynchronous.
Send Step Synchronous used when exception triggered by permanent system errors that occur in the pipeline or while transporting the message to or from the pipeline.Asynchronous Send Step:the exception will only be triggered if an error occurs during the transfer to the pipeline. Errors that occur during mapping in the pipeline, do not trigger an exception.
Transformation step used when to rise Permanent System error occurs.
Regards,
Raj

Error Handling for ABAP Proxy sender

Hello Everyone,
I am trying out a scenario of SAP R/3 to Oracle database (ABAP Proxy to JDBC).
I have the following code and it works fine.
CALL METHOD prxy->execute_asynchronous
      EXPORTING
        output = it.
     commit work
CATCH cx_ai_system_fault .
    DATA fault TYPE REF TO cx_ai_system_fault .
    CREATE OBJECT fault.
    WRITE :/ fault->errortext.
I know that the above Catch block would be used to handle system errors on the sender side.
Please tell me what kind of errors could these be and what I can do to test these errors. ie. I want to create error situations explicitely and see how they are handled.
Thanks and Regards,
Ashwin

Thanks guys, this was useful.
My scenario is for Asynchronous communication.
I guess Fault messages are used in case of Synchronous communication for handling application errors. So if there was something wrong at the JDBC end then I could use the fault messages.
Have i got this right?
I also came across this piece on Acknowledgements. But is says that they can be used with the following Receivers:
The following receivers support acknowledgments:
ABAP and Java proxies (XI 3.0 SP1 for the latter)
Integration processes
IDocs (note that IDocs only return acknowledgments when they have been configured using the ALE audit)
Receiver adapters support system acknowledgments but not application acknowledgments
My Receiver is JDBC. So I guess I cannot use acknowledgements either.
Hence, I need to know what I can do to replicate the system errors eg. failed server etc...so that I can get catch these errors during sending.
I'll tell you abt what happened earlier.
My XI server was down. I executed the code for the sender ABAP Proxy and it did not catch the error. In SXMB_MONI in the R/3 system, I could see the messages queued up. When the XI server started, the messages were transferred to XI.
I need to handle such errors...ie. If the server is down or message did not reach XI then my ABAP program that sends data via ABAP proxy needs to know that something went wrong.
Thanks and Regards,
Ashwin

Reboot due to system error / Register dump from exception handler

hi,
I have a problem with Labview RT when using Reboot function.
The RT target (desktop) reboot but there is a message : Reboot due to system error. And if I reboot once again, the target become in safe mode.
Now, If I look at the log I obtain the following message see more in the log attached!
*** REGISTER DUMP FROM EXCEPTION HANDLER (code 0x80000003) ***
I don't understand why there is this message.
Anybody has an explaination?
Attachments:
Nouveau Document texte2.txt ‏6 KB

julesjay a écrit:
ok I didn't know that. I will wait for tomorrow.
NI france is not very efficient about labview Real time problems.
There is one or two experts and there aren't easily reachable.
So a lot of question I send stay with no answer.....
That why I hope someone will be able to help me.
Hi Julesjay,
After i have see your log file and the problem, i think NI FRANCE are working on your request for all problems you have in your application.
And i don't understand what you say that, because we have make test, we have send us informations for make different tests, and we are still working on your problem.
I know the problem are not resolved, but we are working for resolve it quickly.
I suggested you to contact the AE that are your service request for have more information.
Best regards,
Christophe S.
FSE East of France І Certified LabVIEW Associate Developer І National Instruments France

General Inquiry Regarding Error Handling with System Exec.vi

I have a sub vi that uses the System Exec.vi to send SMS messages when triggered. I am confused as to how the error handling works and why all of the errors seem to go to the "standard error" vs the "Error out". The reason I am interested is because I am trying to interrupt the error out of another script to execute a command if error=true.
I have intentionally created an error to test this, however it does not seem that the signal is ever being sent to the error out, only to the standard error.
Any help/explanation as to how this works would be greatly appreciated.

The Facebook discussion board is just a pilot and that functionality is not available yet (as to my knowledge). You will have to use the actual forum thread to add attachments. You can click the arrow just to the right of thread topic in the Facebook thread and that will take you to the ni.com/forums thread. Or you can navigate here:
http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/General-Inquiry-Regarding-Error-Handling-with-System-Exec-vi/m-p/246...
Having a look at your VI would help to clarify the error handling issue.
Daniel K | NI Applications Engineer | Certified LabVIEW Developer

System error when send file with Sender File Adapter

Hi all,
I have configured a "File To ABAP Proxy" scenario. After configuring, i executed a "Test Configuration" in Integration Directory and it's all OK. But this file unable to reach into ABAP Proxy Target. In the Runtime WorkBench\Message Monitoring, I get an error message in below:
Engine: Adapter Engine
Status: *System Error     *
Start: 15.08.2008 14:04:01
End: 15.08.2008 14:19:01
Sender Service: BS_XI_SERVER
Interface Servic: urn://FILE_TO_PROXY
MI_EMPLOYEE_OB
In this case, I don't know why my Sender File Adapter is error and why status is "System Error" and why it can't reach into Target System. Can it concern a role user?
( For more clearly: I configured the source file and the path correctly. And i used the xml file with the content and the document name correctly. In general, the Sender Adapter File don't convert the sender file and its content is same as the Payload in the "Test Configuration", i think it is all OK.)
Could anyone please help me to resolve this problem, anyone can explain this error, how can i resolve this error?
Thanks a lot in advance,
Vinh Vo

Hi Chirag,
1.I source structure is very simple as below:
<ns0:MT_MATERIAL xmlns:ns0="urn://FILE_TO_PROXY">
   <MATERIAL>
      <WERKS>1000</WERKS>
      <MATNR>MAT00001</MATNR>
      <MAKTX>Chemical Material</MAKTX>
   </MATERIAL>
</ns0:MT_MATERIAL>
2. the Communication Channel Monitoring in Runtim WorkBench\Adapter Engine is OK for my Sender File Communication Channel, it's in Blue Light.
However, i don't know what's FCC?
Thanks and best regards,
Vinh Vo

IDOC: Status (Error/Success/information)report to Sender system

How would one send a message(error/success/information) to the sending(external) system to inform them of the statuses of the messages they've sent to our SAP system?

Hi Baumann,
you have an option called Audit reporting in which you can have the status of idoc at sender side.read the following.
Setting Up Audit Reporting
In the default behavior, after an IDoc is dispatched to a destination system, the sender does not know the state of the process on the destination system. You can configure the system, however, for cross-system reporting. You must model the ALEAUD message between the systems.
Two programs enable cross-system reporting.
1)RBDSTATE. This program is scheduled to run periodically on the destination system. It reports the status of incoming IDocs to the sending system, using the ALEAUD message and ALEAUD01 IDoc. This status information is recorded separately from IDoc status information in the audit logs.
2)RBDAUD01. This program is executed on the sending system. It analyzes the audit log and displays the output as a report.
The RBDSTATE program returns the following statuses, from the receiving to the sending system.
RBDSTATE Is Run on the Receiving System
Status of IDoc in receiving system     Status reported to sending system via ALEAUD
53 (Application document posted.)     41 (Application document created in receiving system.)
51 (Error: Application document not posted.)     Status 39 (IDoc is in the receiving system.) This status is repeated each time RBDSTATE is run, as long as the IDoc remains in status 51.
68 (Error: No further processing.)     40 (Application document not created in receiving system.)
reward points if helpful,

Handling a very larger file from Sender system

Hi Sdn,
Can you please tell me, what should be done from an SAP+XI side to handle a very large file coming from the sender system to be posted to the receiver? What should be done in XI end so that there is no problem in handling the larger file.
Thanks and regards,
Aniruddha Bhattacharya

Hi Aniruddha,
Go to below link and check point number 3.1.1 maintain parameters as mentioned in that point.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/70ada5ef-0201-0010-1f8b-c935e444b0ad

Regarding Error: Unable to Convert Sender System to ALE Logical System

Hi friends,
in File to IDoc scenario, i created a sender business system called bs_filetoidoc_send based on Standalone technical system and a receiver business system based on ABAP r/3 system. in my SAP IDES system which is dual stack (abap+java), XI client is 001 (LS: devclnt001) and r/3 client is 800 (LS: t90clnt090) i.e i'm posting idoc to t90clnt090.
I tried to send a text file. but while processing xml message in XI, i got an error saying "Unable to Convert Sender System to ALE Logical System".
then i searched the blogs and forum and found the solution. it was saying LS name was not assigned to BS bs_filetoidoc_send. so i went to SLD and tried to assign LS devclnt001 to my sender BS bs_filetoidoc_send, but got an error saying that "A business system with LS devclnt001 already exists". when i checked which is that BS, it is supposed to be the INTEGRATION SERVER itself with BS name INTEGRATION_SERVER_DEV.
then i configured my sender BS as INTEGRATION_SERVER_DEV itself which picked up the text file successfully and also receiver abap server received the IDOC with correct data and format with status 51. so scenario worked fine when i used my sender BS as INTEGRATION SERVER itself.
please clear my following doubts which arose after this scenario.
1) why the scenario didn't work when I used only standalone sender business system?
2) why should we assign a LS name of XI server to sender business system only in this scenario?
scenario worked according to my requirement, but using integration server itself as a sender BS confused though.
Many Thanks.

1) I can create any no of LS names using SALE
Yes you can create.
> 2) But I can assign a client to any one of those LS names (or 1 client will have only one LS name associated with it)
One Client will have one LS associated to it...and that can be any one of the LS..created.. use SCC4 to find the associated Ls for all the clients of a system
3) So anyways INTEGRATION_SERVER_DEV has to associated with the client 001 only, so finally I have to use INTEGRATION_SERVER_DEV only as my sender BS. Probleum is that I can't remove the LS name DEVCLNT001 from INTEGRATION_SERVER_DEV and assign it to bs_filetoidoc_send BS right. If I do so, I think I would get an error saying that INTEGRATION_SERVER_DEV is not associated with the LS name of client 001.
As the logical system defined in Partner profile is expected to arrive in Control record of IDoc..it should be passed in that...
Did u checked this blog../people/rajeshkumar.pasupula/blog/2009/03/16/unable-to-convert-the-sender-service-to-an-ale-logical-system so as per you need the explaination in the blog need to associate the logical system name .
HTH
Rajesh

Idoc/ALE error handling, send to external email

Hi all,
I'm developing an IDoc inbound interface for purchase order create using PORDCR1. For the error handling functionality, I need to send an external email describing all of the validation error happened in user-exit EXIT_SAPFKCIM_002. Please kindly tell me how to cater the functionality. I won't use workflow because the error handling can't describe all the error, it just displaying the first error encountered. I also don't want to create any custom object since message type PORDCR1 is available. I think creating a custom FM is a possible way, but if there is another way, please tell me how.
Thanks,
Teddy

Hi Teddy,
A custom FM is the easiest and simple way.There may be other ways.
Regards,
Atish

Sender System Error Handling

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for