Service PO Payment terms

Hi Experts,
Please guide me how to maintain the below payment terms for the service.
Service = Pest control
Payment terms will be  20 % payment on first service  30 % payment on second service and 50 % payment on third service.
In the above scenario how system will come to know to charge 20% of the total amount (Invoice booking) one first service  and so on.
Also Kindly tell me what is the use of limits and functionality.
Regards,
Sri............

HI,
In the scenario explained by you there service qty. is not planned, so i would like to suggest you to go through 2 methods.
One is -  maintain service specification there put qty. as 1 and uom AU Gross price - 20% of total work amount, also in short text specify about 20% work. and follow the same for 30% and 50%. so you can post service entry and invoice as per % wise work.
Next go through Invoice plan work order there instead of service specification specify limit value  and maintain invoice plan simple partial invoice and only maintain next invoicing date. The benefit is no need to post service entry sheet and as per invoice amount FI Guy directly can post Invoice document.

Similar Messages

  • Need BAPI to update 'Payment terms' for service contract

    Hi ,
    I need to update 'Payment Terms' for a large set of Service contracts. Can you pls suggest me a BAPI to do this. Can I use CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN function module for my requirement. If yes, what are the parameters need to be passed?
    Thank you,
    Regards,
    Rajesh.

    Replace the
    LT_BAPISDITMX-CUST_MAT35 = 'X'.
    by a
    LT_BAPISDITMX-PMNTTRMS = 'X'.
    Regards,
    Raymond

  • Adjusting AP Payment terms to allow for mail service

    I am interested in adjusting the Accounts Payable process to release payments earlier than the payment terms (e.g. Net 30 payment would release for payment on 28th day) to allow for postal delays.  Is that possible on across the board for all payees?

    Hi Chris
    In the automatic payment run(F110), in the parameters tab -> input a date which is two days ahead in the filed 'Customer items due by' and input todays date in the field 'Docs entered up to'
    Ex: If the item is due on Sep 14 then input details as below
    Docs enetered up to: 09/12/2014
    Customer items due by: 09/14/2014
    System will pick up all items due as of Doc entered up to date + till the date in Customer items due by.
    Run the payment run the above inputs and check if the next few days due items are pulled into or not.
    Thanks,
    Sekhar

  • Payment Term from Vendor is not going to Freight PO

    Hello All,
    I am not MM consulting but I need to solve a problem.
    As we know when I save a shipment cost document SAP creates a automatically PO for carrier as the configuration.
    I have the payment terms registered in the Vendor Master (Carrier) but when I save my ship cost document and the system creates the PO the payment terms it is not appearing in the PO and consequently is not going to MIRO.
    How should I do to take the Vendor Payment Term to the Freight PO?
    Thanks
    Marcos

    Hi,
       Ensure that the payment terms is maintained in the purchasing view in MK02 for the same purchasing organization.
       If its maintained, the same will be displayed in the automatic PO as well. If its not copied, please create a normal PO in ME21N and check whether the payment term is displayed in header - Delivery / Invoice tab.
       If you are in old release, refer the note: 358506 - Auto Service PO Creation - Passing Values into the Function
       If you are using TM system, refer the note: 1897588 - Payment terms not copied from Vendor master to PO
        If the notes are not valid, then you may check for OSS notes or raise an OSS ticket to SAP.
    Regards,
    AKPT

  • Payment Term/BP on the level of Charge type in FWO

    According to business process I have 2 variants of payment term  for transportation with payer:
    1)      Prepaid (paid by Agency1(Payer1) in POL port of Loading)
    2)      Collect (paid by Agency2(Payer2) in POD port of discharge)
    3)      Today customer has  a requirement to issue several settlements from one FWO to different business partners on the level of  charge type.
    Example:
    BP Role: Payer
    BP : Payer 1
    Payment term: will pay with term prepaid:
    Charge type1 - NTFR (Net Ocean Freight)
    Charge type2 - BAF (Bunker Adjustment Factor)
    BP Role: Payer
    BP : Payer 2 
    Payment term: will pay with term collect:
    Charge type3 - DTHC
    The problem is how to  combine several terms(prepaid/collect/direct) with several BP Roles(Payer)/BP(Payer1/Payer2)on the level of charge type(service) in FWO.
    From the fisrt sight this case could be some way covered by standard on 9.1 functionality of «Charge type activation based on incoterm».
    But at the same time we some issues with this standard solution, because we need to split payer and term not only for the whole stage, but also for different charges in one stage. An example of this could be port to port transportation without any pre-carriage or on-carriage, but with OTHC/DTHC that could be paid in any term(P/C) separately by the appropriate agent in POL or POD. At the same time all the transportation costs will be associated only with one stage of transportation.
    Do anybody has an idea how to split payment term deeper than level of stage?

    Hi,
    You can use the "Flexible Settlement" function in TM9.1.
    Assign the charge types to settlement group.
    Assign the settlement group to settlement rule.
    Assign the settlement rule to settlement profile.
    Best Regards
    Clark Huang

  • Payment terms of the credit memo

    Hi
    When I create a normal credit memo, the credit memo payment terms are derived while when I create a credit memo against an MIRO document, the purchase order payment terms are derived. But even for the credit memo created via MIRO we want the credit memo payment terms to be derived. Is there any way we can set this up.
    Request your help please.
    Thanks
    Lavanya

    Dear Lavanya,
    the system design reports the following two cases::
    -With reference to purchase order
    The system always proposes the terms of payment from the first purchase
    order so that they can be changed in case of goods/service
    With only delivery cost items, the terms of payment key is automatically
    copied from the vendor master record.
    -Without reference to purchase order
    If the terms of payment key does not contain any value, this is copied
    from the accounting view of the vendor master record.
    Depending on whether you first create a purchase order with order
    reference or first create an item without order reference, the terms of
    payment are determined either from the purchase order or from the vendor
    master record in accordance with logic described above.
    I am afraid there is no other functionality avalible for defaulting the
    terms of payment.
    Can you please review SAP Note 322430 with regards to the payment
    terms.
    I hope this helps.
    mauri

  • Are Vendor Payment Terms on RFx Object in Sourcing?

    Hi There,
    We uncovered this document via a Google search:
    http://help.sap.com/scenarios_bus2008/helpdata/en/6d/4c0a50eab44534bef84c9b7bcec94a/content.htm
    The document implies that the vendor payment terms are on the RFx object but I cannot confirm that the field exists on this object in Sourcing 7.  Does anybody know what version of Sourcing supports this mapping?  I haven't been able to find the document that this link belongs to, so it's possible that it's an orphaned page from some old documentation, but I'd appreciate confirmation from one of the experts on this forum.
    Thanks!
    Shanker

    i can confirm that the mapping is available in the standard mapping for Release 7.0. (MM_Award_To_Purchase_Order)
    also, there are many other fields available not included in the mapping guide, but also readily available for use, with some amendments to the Data Types in SAP PI.
    see link for integration guide (including the table you linked)
    http://service.sap.com/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01200252310000091446&_SCENARIO=01100035870000000202&_OBJECT=011000358700000161702011E

  • Maintain payment Terms according to PO Document Types

    Hi,
    We want to maintain Payment Terms according to PO Doc. type. Now in our system PO have disable Payment Terms.
    But we have a requirement that for 1 Doc. Type they should be changeable.
    How it is possible???

    Hi,
    Document type concept is used to differentiate the differentiate procurement processes like example:
    YNB: For Standard procurement
    YIMP: For Import
    YSUB: For Sub Contracting
    YSER: For Service
    A company may have 10 payment terms and one should not use document type based on payment term. Payment term is maintained in vendor master and from vendor master payment tem flow to purchase order.
    For each payment term, if one creates document type, then imagine how many document types will be created to meet business process requirement. Consultant should think & simplify business with proper designing for uses of minimum document types for procurement processes.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Value in payment terms field not dispalyed in invoice after saving MIRO

    Hi,
    I Implemented the BADI- MRM_PAYMENT_TERMS to populate GR date as baseline date in invoice,
    But after saving the invoice when I display the invoice document in MIR4 it not showing the payment terms. It only show the condition ie the discount get in no of days. It show
    payment terms - (Blank)
    Payment in - 14 days 4%
    payment in - 30 days 2 % .
    Can anybody help me on this why this peculiar behavior of transaction after activating BADI.....
    Regards,
    Aditya
    Edited by: Aditya rayalu on Jan 28, 2011 7:37 AM

    Hi,
    have a look at this OSS Note:
    Note 432332 - MIR4 - Field ZTERM is not filled
    https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/432332
    Best regards.

  • Billin Problem related with payment terms

    Hi all SAP experts,
    The client is selling inventorized items (trading goods) as well as services. There are orders in which the client will enter the trading goods as well as a service item called as u201Cinstallation charges.u201D For the trading goods line item category say u201CTANu201D the billing relevance will be u201CA u2013 delivery related billing documentu201D as the invoice will be created after the delivery to close the sales cycle. For the rental contract item category & maintenance item category, the billing relevance will be u201CI u2013 order relevant billing-billing planu201D.
    Say a sales order is created & in that along with the trading item (ATM machine), there is a service line item as well for installation charges. So there will be two different item categories in the same sales order.
    The payment terms will be fetched from the customer master or may be changed in the sales order as per the negotiations with the customer.
    The payment terms will be as follows & will be entered in the sales order:
    1.  50% at the time of order confirmation (sales order).
    2.  40% after the delivery.
    3.  10% after the installation, commissioning & testing.
    Requirements:
    1.  The client wants to generate a separate invoice for all the 3 part payments.
    2.  All the three invoices will have different payment terms. (for example, the sales order is created for 2000 USD. First invoice of 50% i.e. 1000 USD to be created & sent to the customer. Again the customer is supposed to send the payment within 7 days from the date of invoice. So there will be a separate payment term for the part payment to be received.)
    3.  The customer wants to have a report which will display for a sales order u2013 the amount received from the customer & the amount to be received from the customer.
    Doubts:
    1.  In transaction code OBB8, we define the payment term & there is a tick for installment. If we tick this then we can create installments against this payment term.
    2.  In transaction code OBB9, we will see those payment terms only which have the installment indicator ticked. Again here we will specify the percentage of the installment & the payment term for the same. The installments are basically the same percentages to be received every period. Can this be used? If yes then does the system generate a separate invoice for the installment?
    3.  If I use the billing relevance u201CIu201D for trading item as well, then what about the delivery & invoice?
    Please guide me on this issue.
    With best regards,
    Niyaz.

    Hi Jonathan,
    Thanks for your reply. I had some doubts on the solution. Actually to be more precise let me explain you once again:
    In the sales order i have the following line items:
    1. ATM machine - 1 qty. This will be a stock item & the item category will be TAN which has billing relevance as "A" - delivery related billing.
    2. ATM installation - 1 qty. This will be a service item so non-stock item & the item category will be TAX which has billing relevance as "A" - delivery related billing.
    3. Cables - 500 Mts. This will be a stock item & the category will be TAN which has billing relevance as "A" - delivery related billing.
    4. Cables Installation - 1 qty. This will be a service item so non-stock item & the item category will be TAX which has billing relevance as "A" - delivery related billing.
    Like this there can be many other items as well. The installation items will be different as the client wants it to be.
    Now suppose the total order value is 1000 USD. Now the client wants to create 3 different invoices. The payment scenario will be
    1. 50% after order confirmation. Once the sales order is confirmed, then an invoice should be generated from the system with a value of 500 USD. For this particular invoice the payment term will be "within net 7 days".
    2. 40% after the delivery has been done. An invoice to be generated from the system with a value of 400 USD. For this particular invoice the payment term will be "within net 15 days".
    3. 10% after installation. commissioning & testing. An invoice to be generated from the system with a value of 100 USD. For this particular invoice the payment term will be "within net 7 days".
    How should i configure the system in order to map the above requirement. Like i should be able to generate 3 different invoices from the system.
    Also i want to know at any stage for a particular sales order what id the amount received from the customer & the pending amount.
    Overall the sales cycle should be complete.......the document flow should show the
    order: completed
    delivery: completed
    material document: completed
    invoice: completed
    accounting document: not cleared.
    I have one more doubt, if for a stock item i create order related billing (i use billing relevance as "C"), then what will be the overall impact. Like i create the sales order, then delivery with PGI......will it be different from my normal delivery related billing cycle...?
    With best regards,
    Niyaz.

  • Payment terms requirement

    Hi All,
    plz have look on my clent requirement In Account payables.
    Regarding the Payment terms for different vendors following are the scenarios:-
    · For Material
    o 25% payment advance against corporate guarantee, 65% with in 30 days after receipt of material at site and balance 10% with in 30 days on completion of Erection & Commissioning of Towers.
    o 25 % payment advance against Advance Bank Guarantee or Dispatch Documents or Corporate Guarantee, 75% with in 30 days after receipt of material at site.
    o 100% payment with in 30 days from the date of supply on submission of PBG of 5% of Value valid for 12 months from the date of invoice.
    o 20% payment advance against ABG or dispatch documents, 70% with in 30 days after receipt of material at site and balance 10% on submission of PBG of 10% PO value valid for 24 months from the date of supply.
    o 100% payment with in 30 days from the date of supply of material
    · For Services
    o 20% Adv. against PBG,30% on Completion of Civil Works,40% on Site RFE,10% against PBG valid for one Year.
    o 100% payment after 30 days from Civil Completion.
    o 90% with in 30 days on completion of Erection/Installation & Commissioning of Tower/PMU & balance 10% with in 30 days on Acceptance Test.
    o 100% payment with in 30 days on completion of erection & commissioning of DG set.
    Considering the above scenarios following payment form of Oracle is difficult to populate, as it only understand the number of due days against different payment headers, for the same kindly share your comments.
    Plz provide the solution on this
    Thanks
    Srikanth

    hi
    Edited by: user575674 on Mar 2, 2009 3:26 AM

  • In BP master, payment terms

    Hi Experts,
    In BP master, payment terms have credit limit and commitment limit, I want to know how it works. Anyone guide me.
    Thanks and regards,
    Manikandan

    Hi Mani
    The credit limit is effectively the maximum amount of money that you are prepared to loan to the customer. If you set a credit limit of £100K then a warning message appears if you try to raise a delivery if the total outstanding exceeds £100K.
    If you want to control the total value of outstanding sales orders you set a commitment limit. If you are only prepared to allow a customer to have £100K in open sales orders you set the limit to £100K If you try to enter any new sales orders that take the value to over 100K then you get a message when you enter the sales order.
    Both of these warnings are enabled in General Settings - BP.
    Every new customer is vetted through a credit rating service and we set credit limits accordingly. Customers suddenly placing large orders may be checked so we can try and avoid the customers that don't pay on time.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards
    Stewart Clark

  • Modifying Payment terms in AR Invoice

    Hi Experts,
    Is there a way we can modify the payment terms in an AR invoice that comes from PA. I am talking about the Transactions screen of Receivables.
    Any help is greatly appreciated.
    Thanks
    SA

    Paying Methodology from GOP and Democrats
    Hi All
    As we know USA and outside nations work on Software Development, Service Oriented Architecture and ERP/EBUSINESS Solutions and Model Driven Solutions and WebLogic Oracle Fusion Softwares. Lot of good optimization scope for services and Messaging.To help USA Govt to cut down costs.. Cant Help it since Americans also want to work on database design.
    How are payment terms looking in Oracle Ebusiness AR Module.
    What Obama And Harry Reid Nancy Pelosi and John Boehner and John Kline and Schumer and Democrats and GOP are talking about:
    PAYMENT TERM SITUATION::::Whats Happening:::: I just compiled outcome and sending you for just update.
    In this week :
    GOP and democrats are discussing about Payment Laws and Payment Terms::
    1) Payment Term Created Date
    2) Payment Term Validity Period
    3) Payment Term Automatic Expiration Indicator
    4) Payment Term Aggrement Reference Number
    5) Payment Term Initial Threshold Value
    6) Payment Term Start Date
    7) Payment Term End Date
    8) Payment Term Requires Management Approval Indicator Workflow
    9) Payment Term Status : new status value to be added : AUTOMATIC EXPIRED By DEC 31st 2010
    Every country has declared partnership with USA. So USA recognizes their partners.
    Cheers
    Maneesh Innani
    Technical Manager and can help

  • Payment term for net90 and end of month

    Hi Gurus,
    how can I create payment term with following requirement
    net 90+ EOM ( net 90 and end of month ).
    Thanks

    Implement the following SAP Note.
    https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1316578
    You can then use transaction OBB8 to create terms of payment in which the due date is extended until the end of the month after a specified number of days.

  • Kindly advise how to enable payment terms and tax codes in f-22

    1. how  enable Payments terms field and Tax Code in f-22 because i have already configured payment terms in img.
    2. i have configured Sales and Purchase Tax and while posting in f-22 and in f-43, i seleted the Calculate tax but in third screen am unable to see the Tax code field to select my individual tax codes liek v0 for 0% input tax or v1-for calculation of Excise payable, cess payable and vst payable or v2.
    kindly advise how to enable
    1. Payment terms field
    2. Tax codes field
    in f-22

    Hello,
    first you should configure the tax codes and tax types. and payment mothod related to your company code.
    you can set the configure on tax code using the T>Code  :  FTXP in calculation bases.
    once you done the configuration of input/output tax  you can give the tax indicator on related *GL  master data*  in sales a/c and purchase  select the  input tax or out put tax.
    If your posting the document in F-22 or F-43  the system is not display the payment method you can go to field statues variant and select the required button in payment method  and save. t.code is OBC4 .
    you start the entry of document in   third screen click on  tax calculation button and  select  any one of this  Vo,V1 or V2. after you can simulate the entry the system generate the entry of below:
    vendor a/c  dr
      to vat 12.5% ; a/c  cr
      to service tax a/c  cr
      to ed.cess a/c cr
      to hr ed.cess cr
    if you have any doudts reply me.
    regards,
    Keerthi

Maybe you are looking for

  • Bank statement lines are unreconciled status even after the auto recon

    In Cash Management, Bank Statements Loaded, Imported and Reconciled, but for the AP Transactions bank accounts there are few statement lines that are in unreconciled status and few are in reconciled status. IN bank statement line the Error code was :

  • When i try to play music my screen is frozen

    PLEASE HELP

  • Vendor Group Agreement

    Hello and can anyone offer some advice I have the requirement to handle a group agreement which would  be valid for a large number of vendors, that to say for each vendor belonging to this group we are able to use the same purchasing price. I don't w

  • EJB & JSP

    I'm developing application using J2EE 1.3 beta version, with JDK 1.3. The application uses JSP to access EJB, said the JSP is contained in a Web component. In my JSP, I do a lookup to EJB Home object (as shown on the error message below). It works fi

  • Table.putClientProperty("JTable.autoStartsEdit",Boolena.FALSE) and jdk1.3

    Hi. I want to disable automatic cell editing in a JTable with following: JTable myTable = new JTable(3,3); myTable.putClientProperty("JTable.autoStartsEdit",Boolena.FALSE);It works only with JDK1.4 but not with JDK1.3. Does anyone knows how to do thi