SES Cost not settling on REFURB Material in Refurbishment Process.

Hi Experts
I carried out a Refurbishment Process with Valuation Types. On the last part when i do a SES the cost of the SES is not settling to material wich has a valuation type REFURB.
For the above one i created a material code with 3 valuation type as New / Defect / Refurb. The cost of Defect was set to 0 and cost of REFURB was also set to 0. Should i do any changes while creating the REFURB Valuation type.
Can any one help me out....
Regards
Venkat.

hi
where the cost is settling to. whether any actual cost is there
also refer the following link
Doubt related to Refurbishment process
also refer http://www.scribd.com/doc/49382166/X72-Scen-Overview-EN-AU-Rotables-Management
regards
thyagarajan
Edited by: thyagarajan krishnamurthy on Jul 18, 2011 1:05 PM

Similar Messages

Cost not settled to AUC in last fiscal year

Dear SAP Gurus,
We have some WBSE's for which cost is not settled to AUC in last fiscal year. Now while moving the cost from that WBSE's AUC in Current fiscal year , SAP is not allowing us.
So what will be method to settle the cost from those WBSE's to AUC ?
Thanks & Regards,
Pradip

what type settlement you are processing. whether it is a periodic or full settlement.
If you are settling the WBSE to AUC with the periodic settlement refer to the OSS note 425601.
Regards,

Actual cost not correctly displayed for material consumed in an order

Hi All,
I have an issue which is as follows:
In a service order, I have consumed 13 materials for which I am able to view the list of goods movement with its amount and plant and storage location.
For each goods movement system has generated material document, accounting document, controlling document, etc.
However system is not displaying the actual costs of all the 13 materials consumed within the order. Only one material cost is dispalyed in actual cost of overview tab of COSTS tab.
Incidentally, when I clicked the "Rep. Plan/Act." button, system is displaying the actual costs of line item wise material consumption.
Kindly let me know what could be the reason for this error.
Many thanks in advance............ JK.

Kannan,
If the "Rep. Plan/Act." costs are correct, then you have problems with your value categories
Have a look at the following correction programs:
Run TCode OLI5 to correct value category errors (program RIPMCO00)
Run TCode OLPM to re-build structures (program RIPMS001)
PeteA

Cost not settled

We have a entry made against a wbs element that will not be picked up when we try settling.
If we run a PS report for instance S_alr_87013542 it show's a debit on the code for a value, but its not picked up when settlement is run. The wbs has a settlement rule and other costs have settled fine.
Any suggestions on how to clear this value???

Hi,
Do you use network, if you use just check in S_ALR_87013542 that whether this cost is lying on WBS only or its on network activity.
If its on network then create settlement rule on the activity and settle the amount else check for the unsettled cost element and check your allocation structure.
Thanks
Saptak

UNPLANNED DELIVERY COST NOT PROPERLY DISTRIBUTED TO MATERIAL LINE ITEM

Hi ,
Presently my system is Configured to distribute Unplanned Delivery Costs among invoice items,but it is not properly distributed among line item while doing the posting.
What may be the problem,Is there any additional settings to be checked ?or in which areas i need to check? Plz Help regarding this.
Thanks,
Raju

Hi,
Plz chek the SPRO settings for unplanned delivery cost. You need to maintain the company code
in SPRO - Material Management - Logistics Invoice Verification -Incoming invoices - Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted
regards

Additive cost not seen in production order and while settling hits PRD

I am using additive costs for my product costing via CK74n.
Cost estimate looks good since I have the valuation variants setup to include additive costs.
But when I see the production order that is being created, all others costs are being considered except additive costs. They are recognized but not as a line item instead as a variance. When I settle the order the costs actually hit price difference account and not even the GL account that I had assigned for the additive cost. SAP did not consider the cost as variance even if it was showing up as variance initially. This as I understood is partly because of the settlement rule that I have in place which tells SAP to go and settle on the material (which is standard SAP to do since I want all the costs from the production order to settle on the eventual material going into stock) so SAP went on to settling on the material. Since the material is set as standard price the variance is being booked as a price difference entry.
Ideally I would have expected the additive cost getting debited to the order and credited to the gl account that I assigned for the additive cost. The eventual cost (incl. additive cost) should hit the inventory.
Am I missing a step?

Hi Sapluver,
Appreciate your prompt response..Please see my response in italics
Few queries related to your post.
1. So your standard cost got two part, one with quantity structure ( materials, labor, OSC etc) which the system cost automatically and one manual part, which is your additive cost. While costing system picks up this manual part from CK74N.
I hope this part you got correct. Yes, the cost estimate is reading from both the qty structure and the additive costs and the cost roll-up is coming up correctly
2. Now in actual cost controlling, i think System is not sure how to valuate your additive cost actual part.I agree, the additive cost does appear in the cost analysis section of the production order but does not show up as a line item initially. Instead it comes up as a difference item right in the bottom of the screen after totals have been displayed without any line item reference. As if the system is not sure how to display the line item. Once I have done the material issuance confirmation to the order, the additive cost got picked up correctly as I have set it up in the cost component structure as material overhead but again shows up only as variance
Which method you used to debit your production order with additive cost, is it a normal journal entry or through some automatic posting through routing ( example OSC through Purchase order/Good Receipt).I probably need to understand your point more clearly? I am not manually debiting the production order at all for the additive cost. I was expecting SAP to debit the order the same way it does for overheads. Overheads too initially show up as variance but then when we run the overhead calculation KGI2 the overheads costs get debited to the production order. Was expecting similar behavior for additive costs. I am receiving the finished product from the production order into stock via MIGO goods receipt movement type 101. I was expecting the debit to happen perhaps at the time of settlement via CO88 but here the system posted it to the price difference account via account key PRD. This I understand the system did because the settlement rule is set to post all the costs on the material and the material has the valuation control as standard price; so the system is seeing the additive cost as a price difference hence posting it to the price difference account.
System is unaware of the additive cost from actual cost point of view, there is no specification to additive cost from costing variant for actual cost. So you have to debit the order with the additive cost part.So do I manually debit the order with the additive cost? What about the price difference additive cost sitting on the order? Would appreciate if you can tell me the process steps for posting this correctly
regards
Sapluver

Material cost not getting displayed in CN41N

Hi Gurus,
When we execute CN41N, Materials assigned to the Network activity are visible but the cost of each material is not getting displayed against it (under Proj. Cost Plan Column) and it is appearing as '0' whereas, it is appearing as an accumulated cost against the activity. I checked SAP notes for this problem, though I could see some notes which are very close to the problem but all are for Release 600 whereas we are using 604 (ECC 6.0). Have anyone encountered such problems or whether the cost will not appear against Material in CN41N.
Awaiting your valuable suggestions.
thanks in advance.
Vinodh

I have seen planned cost of material against material itself in structure report like CN41, CN41N under following conditions:-
1. Valuated Project Stock
2. Material is created using Reservation for WBS or PR+Res for WBS Procurement indicators.
3. Costing relevancy box ticked for material
4. Statistical Cost element exists for Inventory account.
I have not seen planned cost for non-stock item or material with res for network in project. This is purely based on my experience and I dont have any notes or help document to validate my statement.

Work order to cost center settlement does not post to GL module (FI)

Dear Expert,
I find the Maintenance Work order to cost center settlement does not post to GL module (FI)?Also, the settlement cost element is primary element define in GL chart of account.
When an maintenance order is settled with KO88 or KO8G the work order value posted cost center and the value is display in cost center report but not post to GL module in FI.As I notice only good issue or receive to/from work order is posted in GL but not the settlement of work order.Why?
Between, Kindly advise what are the report or T-code to view the maintenance order is done the settlement and what are the value is settle for maintenance work order?
Kindly advice under what circumstance when maintenance work order to cost center settlement is posted to GL(FI module)?
Please advice.
Thank you.
KH

Hi Kiran,
The error message clearly says that "Cost Center validity starts from 01.10.2014" i.e. in the future period.
Change the cost center from period in the past date and try.
BR, Srinivas Salpala

Settlement of planned deliv. costs not possible if GR-related data entered

Hi gurus,
While doing T-code MRRL if i am entering the GR posting date and ticking the good + delivery check box an error message is trigerd 'Settlement of planned deliv. costs not possible if GR-related data entered'.PLZ reply the reson for this error.

I Have the same problem them I realise that :
This message just appear if i am using doc. selection = 4 .
tks
Teresinha

Raw material cost not coming KE30 profitability report

Dear Gurus,
We have two material type for our finished product for one material type without having cost release for current period we can't release the billing document for accounts but in other material type we can release the billing document for account without releasing the cost for current period.
This occurs with problem that in KE30 we are not receiving the raw material cost & administration cost. Please suggest what should I do to correct this?
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
I already assigned costing key to material type (FERT,HALB) but bifurcation of COGM not flow to CO-PA.
In T.code KEPR
1.All F/V i maintained as 3 is it ok or i need to maintain it 1 or 2.
2.In T.code KE4J
Record type = F i maintained for FERT,HALB category materials & assigned in Costing key
Earlier before release i assigned in T.code ke4i
Condition type Value fields
VPRS Stock value
Then some value flow to copa
After i release i removed stock value from ke30 report and added material cost ,sub contracting cost,material overhead but no value flown CO-PA.
Pl check
Regards,
Debashis

Material cost to be settle on another material cost.

Dear Gurus
We have business scenario like as mentioned below
If any material got damaged, that material will go for REFURBISHMENT process for that material value will be ZERO.
In refurbishment time we use spares parts for getting main material unristricted. this case i want to settle the spare parts cost on main material.
Please suggest the account determination process. what are the accounting key will take place.
regards
srinivas.

Dear Srinivas,
where that refurbish material is going?
and with the same material code are you getting back after the repair,
like this type scenarios ,split valuation is good with valuation types like damaged,refurbish and repaired ,
coming to transaction event key, BSX is at the time getting back the material,
cost will post to various G/L , if u maintain the diffrent valuation class at valuation type level,
chenna

Table for Material-Cost center-Settlement Rule_REM product cost collecter

I want to generate a report to see for particular material which cost center and which settlement rule is available.
If we go in Product cost collecter (PCC) there we have an option to see settlement rule under header tab, I want to fetch that data for material as selection parameter, can anyone suggest how to get the data as,
Material        Cost Center        Settlement Rule
Thank you.
Regards,
Deven

Hi,
pleasefind tables related with cost.
                      TKA01               Controlling areas
                     TKA02               Controlling area assignment
                     KEKO               Product-costing header
     KEPH               Cost components for cost of goods manuf.
     KALO               Costing objects
     KANZ               Sales order items - costing objects
     Cost center master data
                    CSKS               Cost Center Master Data
                    CSKT               Cost center texts
                    CRCO               Assignment of Work Center to Cost Center
                    COSP               CO Object: Cost Totals for External Postings
                    COEP               CO Object: Line Items (by Period)
.     COBK               CO Object: Document header
     COST               CO Object: Price Totals
Regards
SANIL

Shipment cost not added to material

hello Gurus
In inbound Transportation, shipment cost is not getting loaded to material cost while doing PGR... Pls Help
Rgds

Dear Guru's
With refernece to this note:
To add shipment costs to delivery costs in the incoming shipments, you need the following settings in Customizing:
Shipment cost item categories
Under the Shipment cost types and item categories activity, set the Relevant for costing field to A = Relevant for calculating delivery costs (Delivery costs). This results in the shipment costs not being transferred directly into accounting. The accounting is done via the purchasing functionality for delivery costs.
Conditions in the purchase order
Under the Define condition types activity, set the Condition type field to B = Delivery costs. In addition, select the Transfer shipment costs field. The system only shows this field, if you have chosen delivery costs as condition type. In the purchase order, you have to enter the condition type in the item category section. However, you do not enter a value since this value will be determined by the shipment cost document and will then be automatically transferred to the goods receipt document.
Goods receipt
To find the relevant shipment cost documents, you must know the corresponding inbound deliveries. Therefore for incoming goods this must relate to confirmation-related goods receipts. Under the Set up confirmation control activity, select the GR-relevant and GR assignment fields for the appropriate confirmation control key (which is then entered in the purchase order).
Can any one let me know how can i enter condition type in item category section? and also tell me can load shipment cost to material in case of outbound delivery.
Regards,
Rashid Masood

Costing in cProjects 4.0 - Material costs not reflecting

Hi,
In cProjects 4.0, i have replicated the cProject to PS project. I wish to capture the material costs in the project. How should i proceed ?
Please suggest.
Regards,
Amit
9820502246
[email protected]

Hi Amit,
cProjects has not field to caputure material costs.
You may however, create an additional field and use that to capture material costs in cProjects. You will need to map this additonal field to the material cost field in PS while replicating project from cProjects to PS. I am not sure of how you will do this. See if there is any BAdI that can help you.
Regards,
Reema.
<i>pl award all useful points.
Do post back if you find a solution.</i>
Message was edited by:
Reema Shahbazkar

After Settlement, Cost not transfer from one WBS to another WBS in customer project

Hello Experts,
I am trying to settle cost from one WBS (i.e. XYZ-000014-1) to another WBS (i.e. XYZ-00001)in customer project.
Its a revenue type of project.
I have added 4 internal activities in an network under one WBS (i.e. XYZ-000014-1).
Got actual values after confirming activities, then settle that network cost on WBS (i.e. XYZ-000014-1) through CJ88.
Now while trying to settle that cost from WBS (i.e. XYZ-000014-1) to WBS (i.e. XYZ-00001) through CJ88, system not showing any result.
Kindly give ur valuable inputs.
Regards,

Kindly tell me that is it a standard functionality of SAP that through CJ88 we can transfer cost from WBS to WBS.
Technically ,Yes.Cost is actually transferred from one cost object to another cost object.
I hv discuss the same with some of my frds ...some are denying the same that its not a standard functionality of SAP to transfer cost on same cost object.
Instead of 'transfer' I would rather use the word 'settlement' . Practically, they are right as projects-WBS are temporary endeavors of companies, and cost can not reside on WBS permanently as it has to settle to some entity (organizational unit) which can be accounted during the reconciliation of their chart of accounts and balance sheets.
SAP has provided us an option to settle our cost to WBS and hence its standard . Generally, we use it when we have 1 WBS at level 1 and all lower WBS's costs is settled to this WBS . Here, we specify Level 1 WBS as the receiver of cost of these lower WBS.
Hope,I am clear here.
Regards
Saurabh

SES Cost not settling on REFURB Material in Refurbishment Process.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for