Set Commissions By

In the "Set Commissions By" options I noticed SAP allowed me to mark both the Items and Business partners. I then specified a commission % on the item (10%) and the business partner (5%) and added an invoice for that customer and item. I reveiwed the JE and saw no commission entry. I expected there to either be a 10% or 5% commission entry made. Is that not how b1 works for commission calculations?

The commissions are calculated in a report and are not posted to any accounts. This is from B1 help. Have you checked any reports?
Thanks,
Gordon

Similar Messages

How to set commit interval after n rows when generating insert statements?

Hi
I'm trying to generate a sql insert script with a few million rows using SQL Developer 1.5.4.
I can generate insert scripts ok, but can't see anywhere to set the commit interval.
In the preferences screen under migration I see you can set the commit interval under data move options, but I assume this is something different.
I know we could use sql loader, but this insert is part of deployment package which has a series of sql scripts that we need to run together. So I don't want to run a series of sql scripts, then run sql loader, and then go back to sql scripts.
Am i missing something, or is this just not possible with SQL Developer?
Thanks in advance for your help,
Pete

Unfortunately, SQL Developer doesn't cover all of the SQL*Plus commands. There is a preference in SQL Developer to switch on autocommit in the SQL worksheet (Tools > Preferences > Database > Worksheet Parameters), but that is presumably every record, rather than every 100 as you are trying to do.
There is a document on SQL Developer's SQL*Plus support (here), but that doesn't list autocommit in either the supported or unsupported sections.
theFurryOne

How to Set COMMIT intervals in ODI

Hi Guru's,
Iam getting around 3 Million records from the source,
In my IKM I have an option for selecting commit interval for 1000 rows. This may reduce my performance.
Could you please provide any thoughts, how to increase the COMMIT interval to 10000 rows or more.
Thanks in Advance
Regards,
- Rafi

It is not possible to select a different interval. Typically, 1000 rows is suitable and gives you good performances.
If you are looking for better performances, I would recommend to play around the Array Fetch/Batch Update parameters to improve the transfer speed across systems.

Setting DESFORMAT parameter with Comma as delimiter

Hi Gurus,
I have a report in which i set the DESFORMAT to Delimited and whenever i generate the output, it is a tab separated file. The reason is that the default delimiter is Tab. How can i set Comma as the delimiter for that report. I don't want to change it for all the reports, means i don't want to change any of the environment variablr. I want this change only for this report.
Thanks in advance
Manish

I haven't had personal experience with it,
but the reference docs say that DELIMITER
is a possible option to RWBLD60 as well.
(Only for DESFORMAT=delimited.)
Also, the built-in-help says that if you
select file->generate-to-file->delimited,
you'll get a dialog box for options, one of
which is the delimiter. Tried it, seems to
work. Doesn't like Unicode, which is one of
the reasons I don't use DELIMITED...
-- Allan Plumb

Commit & Rollback in procedure.

Hi All,
I am Using ODI 11.6 and Oracle 11 g.
I have a senario
where i have Int_1--->Procedure 1--------->Int_2
The int_1 will update Table_1
If the procedure_1 is succesfully runs then it updates Tab_2
Suppose the Int_2 will fail which will update the Tab_3
I need to rollback the Tab_2 and Tab_1.
How to do this in ODI?
So we have any kind of Commit option in Procedure?
Thanks,
Lony

lony wrote:
Hi All,
I am Using ODI 11.6 and Oracle 11 g.
I have a senario
where i have Int_1--->Procedure 1--------->Int_2
The int_1 will update Table_1
If the procedure_1 is succesfully runs then it updates Tab_2
Suppose the Int_2 will fail which will update the Tab_3
I need to rollback the Tab_2 and Tab_1.
Interface 1 & 2 should use KMs which runs DDL and DML operations is separate transction.
For your info , most of the shiped KM do this . Just verify the same once again
Once the above is done then note the DML operation is happening in which transtion . Say it is happening in transction1.
Set commit to no for INT_1
Create your procedure and set commit to no commit
In the procedure set the transction to the same as that ok INT_1 IKM ( say transction1)
INT_2 set commit to yes
Thanks,
Sutirtha

Set listbox items from web service response

Hi All
I am trying to set list box items from a web service response. Couple of issues over here:
1. The user should be able to select multiple items from the list. Hence if I set "Allow multiple values" and set Commit on "exit", then after the web service returns the output, no data is displayed in the listbox. I need to click inside the list box to see the data returned by the web service. How to overcome this..?? ( However this problem (clicking inside the listbox to see the items) does not exist if "Allow multiple values" is unchecked and Commit is set on "Select". )
2. After the list box is filled up, certain default values should be selected. This selection is based on one of the response field (which is actually a table with multiple values... ). Hence, how to capture this response field and set the default values in the above list..??
3. The same case for a dropdown. The values are visible in dropdown. However, a default value should be selected and displayed after returning a response from web service. Again, this default value is dependant on another field in the response as in point no.2
I am trying to use postExecute event as described in [this|http://forms.stefcameron.com/2009/03/23/pre-process-web-service-responses/] link...however not able to achieve the functionality. Please provide suggestions / inputs.
Thanks
Deepak

Hello,
first: I don´t know anything about the right solution. I am unaware of the existence of the solution, because there were quite many of question about this multiple selection problem and I don´t remember a single "answer".
I can recommend you to simplify everything and create the functionality yourself. I have done that before to avoid these "Adobe-standard" problems. If you have a problem with autofill of the object, ask your WS to send you a single string and pass it yourself using scripting (JS).
And if you have problems with multiple selection, create your own field/ object. Get the string of values, parse it, create multiple lines of the dynamic table with some suitable tool to check/ select the rows you need (use checkbox for example, and your text as a table row). This way you can selected anything you want with no problems at all. It wil only cost you some extra work.
Regards, Otto

Corelated commit in owb

Hi,
can any one explian how corelated commit works in owb.suppose if i enable corelated commit in mapping and when i am running same mapping and if i
pass runtime parameters like commit frequency=10000.
whether it will commit every 10000 records in target because of commit frequency or it will commit at the end of loading all records in target because of corelated commit.please comment on this issue.
Regards
naren

Commit frequency and Correlated Commit are 2 independent configuration parameter. Setting Commit frequency to 10000 will make sure that the commit happens after every 10000 records irrespective of whether Correlated Commit is set or not.
Commit frequency is applicable only for rowbased and rowbased (target) mode.
Correlated commit is applicable when you have a single source populating multiple target tables in a single mapping. OWB User guide chapter 11 (page 11-16) has very good explanation of how correlated commit works.
Hope this helps.

Commit performance in Procedure

Hi All,
We have a procedure where in that we updating the records
we set commit level on 10000 records.
But from some times we are facing issue..where this procedure running for long time as per more than expected.
After that we have changed the commit level to 5000 and it run well, next time again we had same long running issue.
Again we changed Commit level to 2000 and it runs ok...
Still we are facing the same perfoemance issue.
Now currently we are running the the procedure at Commit level 500.
I don't know what exactly it is causing.
we have enough space in all tablespaces.
Could you highlight why procedure shwoing the same issue after changing the Commit level.
Thanks

What else is going on at the same time with that table? If other processes are working on the same resources, you might be experiencing delays because of other transactions/sessions locking the records that your stored proc wants to update. It may be against normal practice, but committing after every operation on a table that is heavily used by other processes at the same time might actually improve performance.
gojko adzic
http://gojko.net

Polymorphic View commit does not validate & returns invalid status

JClient 9.05.2, using the departments table i was able to reproduce the problem im having.
I added a type field and created departments type a and b, included them as subtypes in the default departments view and tested the Appmodule departmentsA view, create and then save without any input -- the primary key validates as being required as it should.
Now create a panel for DepartmentAView1 perform insert and then commit -- no validation and this ties to another posting I have isTransactionDirty() returns the wrong results. What to do, suggestions?

Hello,
It's just refresh problem. Your Commit button is not aware of checkbox checking so it isn't changing it's enability (initially disabled).
What you could do is:
a) set checkbox autoSubmit="true" and set Commit button partialTrigger to checkbox Id.
This will inform Commit button to refresh.
or (better)
b) remove Commit button disabled property.
This will keep Commit button always enabled.

I parallelize the use of SQL*Loader.But it always commit per 89 rows

I parallelize the use of SQL*Loader. But it always commit per 89 rows. How can I set Commit Row Number?

enlarge the BINDSIZE= and ROWS= option or better use DIRECT=TRUE
(and no need to parallelize [whatever this is in your case])

Breakdown to commit...

How can i break down the below update statement,
as it will update about 100M rows and our DBA will not
approve this to go in prod. As he said the undo needed
will be real big for such a big update. He asked me to break
the sql down and commit after 10,000 rows. So how can i break
this update down and commit every 10K rows in some pl/sql block?
update test set comm = '800'
where dept = '30';
commit;

user8975483 wrote:
How can i break down the below update statement,
as it will update about 100M rows and our DBA will not
approve this to go in prod. As he said the undo needed
will be real big for such a big update. He asked me to break
the sql down and commit after 10,000 rows. So how can i break
this update down and commit every 10K rows in some pl/sql block?
update test set comm = '800'
where dept = '30';
commit;If this is a one-off update, then I don't see a problem with the concept of breaking the update up into smaller chunks. I would have problems if you tried to loop through a cursor and commit every N rows, though!
The ideal way to do this if you're going to chunk the update up (IF AND ONLY IF it's an adhoc update that's run very infrequently) is something like:
DECLARE
v_update_date DATE := sysdate;
v_num NUMBER := 10000;
BEGIN
LOOP
    UPDATE some_table
    SET       some_col = 'some val',
           last_updated_col = v_update_date
    WHERE last_updated_col < v_update_date
    AND    rownum <= v_num;
    EXIT WHEN SQL%ROWCOUNT < v_num;
END LOOP;
END;
/(NB untested, so there may be some syntax errors in there; you should be able to fix those yourself if there are any!)
This does require you to have a column in your table that you can tell the already-updated rows apart from the to-be-updated rows, plus the data in the table should not be amended during the course of waiting for the updates.
If the update is to be a regular occurrence, then increasing the UNDO tablespace is the way to go. Your DBA would have to put up a pretty spectacular answer in order to convince me otherwise!
Edited by: Boneist on 12-Jan-2010 16:40
Of course, Buga suggests a very good alternative, although if you do go that way, don't forget to recreate the table with the same constraints, indexes, triggers, etc that the original table had!

Commissions by Item Group

Does anyone know a way to set commissions by item group, for a specific sales person? In other words, one sales person gets a percentage commission based on a specific item group. Item Group A is 10% for Saleman C, Item Group B is 5% for Salesman C, for example. Only way i have so far is a formatted search, but would prefer to do in B1 without special coding.
Thanks

I think this is a question better suited to the B1 Core forum - I think us developers are only going to suggest special coding

Is commit necessary to end autonomous transaction?

CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER TRIG_EMP
AFTER UPDATE
ON EMP
FOR EACH ROW
DECLARE
PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION;
CNT NUMBER := 0 ;
BEGIN
--PROCE_TRIG_TEST_EMP;
SELECT COUNT(*)
INTO CNT
FROM EMP;
UPDATE EMP_bkp
SET COMM=999
WHERE ENAME ='SMITH';
-- COMMIT;
DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line('TRIG_EMP CALLED.. DONE: '||CNT);
END;
Error: "autonomous transaction detected "
if i open update n block commit code then error.
if i block both update n commit code then without commit code is running fine.
My Ques: If commit is necessary to end autonomous transaction then when i m blocking update n commit lines then too running without above error?
plz clear my concept..
pc

PC wrote:
thanks ..I will take care of it i.e. "IM".
In above code when I am blocking both "update & commit code lines" then there is no error raised by program.
I am using commit when I need that my "update transaction must be commit",if I am only taking "count of table emp" then no need of commit...
Like this I am not getting any exception..!Doing anything on the same table that caused the trigger to fire can lead to you getting a mutating table error, so care should be taken in that respect.
I got your point that I must commit and I will use it but here if I am using autonomous transaction without commit then I must get error but I am not facing ..plz guide me againThe point of an autonomous transaction is to effectively make Oracle spawn off a seperate transaction. Usually we consider that we have just a single transaction per session at any one time, but there are times, like when we need to log errors or audit something, that we want to ensure something get's written to a table, even if the transaction we are in needs to be rolled back or is about to raise an exception. In such cases we use an autonomous transaction to spawn the seperate transaction to perform that task. Good design would have that autonmous transaction as a seperate procedure to be called (rather than in the trigger itself) to keep it completely seperate from the current transaction, and thus when that seperate procedure finishes, any changes it has made must be committed or rolled back because the autonomous transaction that has been spawned is about to finish. Of course, if that procedure doesn't actually do any work on the database that requires committing or rolling back, then it's not necessary to issue one, but then there would be no need for an autonomous transaction in the first place.
So, with your trigger (let's ignore that fact that making the trigger autonomous is p!ss poor design), if you only do the count and don't do the update statement, then there is nothing to be committed, so there's no need for a commit statement, even if the trigger is defined as an autonomous transaction. But, if you include the update statement, then that spawned transaction must be committed before the trigger ends, so that the transaction is completed and control can return to the calling transaction. So, making your trigger autonomous doesn't mean that it must commit by itself... but making it autonomous and including something that needs committing, does mean it must commit.

Commit Work for just one function module

Hi experts,
i have one question;
I need one solutions for commit work but just one function module. If i set commit work in function module then everything is taking the commit. But i dont like this. I need just for FM. This is impossible ?
Thak you, regards.

Hi,
The only way I know involves creating a nested LUW - opening a new internal session by calling ABAP program using SUBMIT ... AND RETURN or a CALL transaction code.
Meaning, you'd have to code your logic in a report program/transaction, use the function module to merely call that report/transaction and, if necessary, use EXPORT/IMPORT or SHARED MEMORY to exchange data between the sessions. It's quite "ugly" solution IMO, and it involves session handling overhead, which can make it unsuitable for time-critical mass processing.
Cheers,
Janis

Same basic color shortcuts as inDesign/illustrator/Photoshop

Long standing miss from me, really useful when switching from an app to the other (Ps/Ai/inD)
Shortcuts for
D : Default color (black/White),
Shift-X : switch the colors
And may be 2 of the 3 most basic ones :
, ; : (on the bottom right of a french keyboard) which set :
, (comma) : picks the fill color (flat)
: (colon) : picks the transparent color
; (semicolon) : picks a gradient (in Muse, may be switches from flat to gradient’s last settings ?)
the ability to pick a color would require another default :
X : switches the focus to fill/stroke color so we can remove (transparent) a stroke color, turn it into a flat fill, etc.

You need to ask in those forums
The Cloud forum is not about using individual programs
The Cloud forum is about the Cloud as a delivery & install process
If you will start at the Forums Index https://forums.adobe.com/welcome
You will be able to select a forum for the specific Adobe product(s) you use
Click the "down arrow" symbol on the right (where it says All communities) to open the drop down list and scroll

Set Commissions By

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for