Polymorphic View commit does not validate & returns invalid status

JClient 9.05.2, using the departments table i was able to reproduce the problem im having.
I added a type field and created departments type a and b, included them as subtypes in the default departments view and tested the Appmodule departmentsA view, create and then save without any input -- the primary key validates as being required as it should.
Now create a panel for DepartmentAView1 perform insert and then commit -- no validation and this ties to another posting I have isTransactionDirty() returns the wrong results. What to do, suggestions?

Hello,
It's just refresh problem. Your Commit button is not aware of checkbox checking so it isn't changing it's enability (initially disabled).
What you could do is:
a) set checkbox autoSubmit="true" and set Commit button partialTrigger to checkbox Id.
This will inform Commit button to refresh.
or (better)
b) remove Commit button disabled property.
This will keep Commit button always enabled.

Similar Messages

ERROR: "info.plist does not validate against DTD"

Hi! I got this error if anyone has it solved Please HELP.
I am trying to package a WRT widget using Nokia WRT extension for Adobe Dreamweaver. This is the place for info on the extension: http://www.forum.nokia.com/Tools_Docs_and_Code/Tools/Runtimes/Web_Runtime/
I figure developer from here who use DW to develop mobile content might know the error.
When come to the step of 'Package Nokia WRT Widget' I got this error: info.plist does not validate against DTD
and a page of error info shown like this:
DTD validated at: Wed Jun 17 2009 19:03:00 GMT+0800 (Malay Peninsula Standard Time)
DTD used for validation: http://www.nokia.com/DTDs/plist-1.0.dtd
Line
Column
Message
Explanation
Source
2
95
DTD did not contain element declaration for document type name
3
16
Attribute "version" exists, but can not be used for this element.
3
21
element "plist" undefined. Did you mean "applet" or "strike"?
4
7
element "dict" undefined. Did you mean "strike" or "input"?
5
7
element "key" undefined. Did you mean "strike" or "blockquote"?
6
10
element "string" undefined. Did you mean "strong" or "strike"?
7
7
element "key" undefined. Did you mean "strike" or "blockquote"?
8
10
element "string" undefined. Did you mean "strong" or "strike"?
9
7
element "key" undefined. Did you mean "strike" or "blockquote"?
10
10
element "string" undefined. Did you mean "strong" or "strike"?
11
7
element "key" undefined. Did you mean "strike" or "blockquote"?
12
10
element "string" undefined. Did you mean "strong" or "strike"?
13
7
element "key" undefined. Did you mean "strike" or "blockquote"?
14
9
element "true" undefined. Did you mean "textarea" or "tr"?
Can anyone knows what this means and how i can solve it?
Please help. Thankyou.
note: I am new here and knows that keep asking quesion without giving back is not good but I have a deadline here and wanted to finish the job. I will read some other post and try to help in return when I am able to do so.

Hi pziecina,
Thanks for your reply,
I suspect my problem is the installation or setup of my system or software. as the result i tested is not by doing any scripting at all. All I did is following one of their example exactly (http://www.forum.nokia.com/Tools_Docs_and_Code/Tools/Runtimes/Web_Runtime/Dreamweaver_Exte nsion/QuickStart.xhtml) and package strightaway without modifying the code. because I want to make sure i got the extension install correctly. even so by packaging one of their ready make example already yield this error.

Task.toXML() creates xml that does not validate against WorklistTask.xsd

I am using the worklist API and I am using the toXML() function provided in the Task object to serialize my Task info to XML. It produces XML that looks alot like a "task" Element. But, it does not validate against the WorkflowTask.xsd schema. What is even more odd is that XML looks different than the xml I see when I look at the data in the BPEL Console.
For example, the first XML document below is from Task.toXML. notice that it's first child element is taskId. According to the xsd, that is not valid. The second xml document in this post is from the console. it appears to be valid.
Am I doing something wrong or should I just not expect the worklist api to produce valid xml? (correction: should I not expect the worklist api to xml that validates?)
<task xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/pcbpel/taskservice/task"><taskId>0D7B97F1B138EE21E04017AC2B194357</taskId><title>Payment not posted by payee</title><isGroup>true</isGroup><acquiredBy/><owner>bpeladmin</owner><conclusion/><state>ASSIGNED</state><subState>ASSIGNED</subState><processId>ResearchRequestWorkflow</processId><processName>ResearchRequestWorkflow</processName><versionNumber>1</versionNumber><notm>1</notm><taskGroupId/><taskType>http://blade-11.payveris.com:9700/orabpel/default/ResearchRequestWorkflow/1.0/taskConfigResearchRequest.xml</taskType><identificationKey>PAULA MERRILL, 2069</identificationKey><priority>3</priority><creator>bpeladmin</creator><creationDate>2006-02-23T14:53:08.000-05:00</creationDate><updatedBy>bpeladmin</updatedBy><modifyDate>2006-02-23T14:53:08.000-05:00</modifyDate><flexString1>1140724383057</flexString1><flexString2>PAULA MERRILL</flexString2><flexString3>PAULA MERRILL</flexString3><flexString4>PaymentId3489</flexString4><flexLong1>0</flexLong1><flexLong2>0</flexLong2><flexDouble1>0.0</flexDouble1><flexDouble2>0.0</flexDouble2><processVersion>1.0</processVersion><instanceId>2304</instanceId><domainId>default</domainId><approvers/><hasSubTasks>false</hasSubTasks><processOwner>bpeladmin</processOwner><pattern>SINGLE_APPROVAL</pattern><taskNumber>10240</taskNumber><systemString1/><systemString2/><systemString3/><versionReason>Task Created</versionReason><assigneeGroups>ResearchManager</assigneeGroups><payload confirmation_number="1140724383057" due_date="2006-02-22-05:00" reason="Payment not posted by payee"><requester xmlns="http://www.pp.com/schema"><first>PAULA MERRILL</first><last>PAULA MERRILL</last><tax_id/></requester><payment_type xmlns="http://www.pp.com/schema" number="">insuranceauto</payment_type><record_info xmlns="http://www.pp.com/schema"><creation app="EU" by="282950" date="2006-02-23T14:53:03.056-05:00"/><updation app="EU" by="282950" date="2006-02-23T14:53:03.056-05:00"/></record_info><payment xmlns="http://www.pp.com/schema" id="3489"><bank_info bank_id="2" funds_model="RISK"/><payment_info><confirmation_number>5428</confirmation_number><amount formattedValue="77.00" value="77"/><payment_date>2006-01-06-05:00</payment_date><check_number>5851</check_number><funded>false</funded><merged>false</merged><network id="3" status="ACTIVE" type="C">MOORE</network><alert_on_completion>false</alert_on_completion><alert_number_days_before>0</alert_number_days_before><scheduled_info id="2278"><scheduled_for_date formatted="01/06/2006">2006-01-06-05:00</scheduled_for_date><scheduled_on_date formatted="01/06/2006">2006-01-06-05:00</scheduled_on_date><created_user_id>282950</created_user_id><updated_user_id>0</updated_user_id></scheduled_info></payment_info><payee_info id="24958" relationship_id="6004"><payee_account_number>JUNIT123</payee_account_number><nick_name>blahblah</nick_name><name>complexpayeenameforatest</name><address1>123 main street</address1><address2>c/o anybody</address2><city>Dark Cityrandomizer</city><state>CT</state><zip>06512</zip><network id="3" status="ACTIVE" type="C">MOORE</network></payee_info><customer_info id="2069"><name>PAULA MERRILL</name><customer_account_id>8</customer_account_id><customer_account_number>213</customer_account_number><customer_routing_number>111111111</customer_routing_number><address1>Ernest Hemingway Drive</address1><city>Springfield</city><state>IL</state><zip>62703</zip></customer_info><state_info><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-10-24-05:00</state_date><state formatted="Check Cashed by Payee" id="2">Cleared</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number></state_info><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>0</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="6">Created</state><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:33-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="6">Created</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:35-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="22">Waiting for Decision</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:36-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="12">Ready for Funding</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:40:01-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="9">Funded</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:40:01-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="12">Ready for Funding</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:40:03-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="In Process" id="9">Funded</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:43:56-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date><state formatted="Mailed" id="11">Payment Sent</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:43:59-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><state_history><failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code><money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id><good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id><network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id><state_date>2006-10-24-05:00</state_date><state formatted="Check Cashed by Payee" id="2">Cleared</state><trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number><record_info><creation app="EU" by="9999999" date="2006-02-03T12:38:08-05:00"/></record_info></state_history><record_info><creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:33-05:00"/><updation app="EU" by="9999999" date="2006-02-03T12:38:08-05:00"/></record_info><research_request>false</research_request></payment></payload></task>
When Im look at the same task in the BPELConsole, the task looks like:
<task>
<title>Payment not posted by payee</title>
<assigneeUsers/>
<assigneeGroups>ResearchManager</assigneeGroups>
<acquiredBy/>
<owner>bpeladmin</owner>
<payload confirmation_number="1140724383057" due_date="2006-02-22-05:00" reason="Payment not posted by payee" >
<requester>
<first>PAULA MERRILL</first>
<last>PAULA MERRILL</last>
<tax_id/>
</requester>
<payment_type number="" >insuranceauto</payment_type>
<record_info>
<creation app="EU" by="282950" date="2006-02-23T14:53:03.056-05:00" />
<updation app="EU" by="282950" date="2006-02-23T14:53:03.056-05:00" />
</record_info>
<payment id="3489" >
<bank_info bank_id="2" funds_model="RISK" />
<payment_info>
<confirmation_number>5428</confirmation_number>
<amount formattedValue="77.00" value="77" />
<payment_date>2006-01-06-05:00</payment_date>
<check_number>5851</check_number>
<funded>false</funded>
<merged>false</merged>
<network id="3" status="ACTIVE" type="C" >MOORE</network>
<alert_on_completion>false</alert_on_completion>
<alert_number_days_before>0</alert_number_days_before>
<scheduled_info id="2278" >
<scheduled_for_date formatted="01/06/2006" >2006-01-06-05:00</scheduled_for_date>
<scheduled_on_date formatted="01/06/2006" >2006-01-06-05:00</scheduled_on_date>
<created_user_id>282950</created_user_id>
<updated_user_id>0</updated_user_id>
</scheduled_info>
</payment_info>
<payee_info id="24958" relationship_id="6004" >
<payee_account_number>JUNIT123</payee_account_number>
<nick_name>blahblah</nick_name>
<name>complexpayeenameforatest</name>
<address1>123 main street</address1>
<address2>c/o anybody</address2>
<city>Dark Cityrandomizer</city>
<state>CT</state>
<zip>06512</zip>
<network id="3" status="ACTIVE" type="C" >MOORE</network>
</payee_info>
<customer_info id="2069" >
<name>PAULA MERRILL</name>
<customer_account_id>8</customer_account_id>
<customer_account_number>213</customer_account_number>
<customer_routing_number>111111111</customer_routing_number>
<address1>Ernest Hemingway Drive</address1>
<city>Springfield</city>
<state>IL</state>
<zip>62703</zip>
</customer_info>
<state_info>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-10-24-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="Check Cashed by Payee" id="2" >Cleared</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
</state_info>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>0</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="6" >Created</state>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:33-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="6" >Created</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:35-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="22" >Waiting for Decision</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:36-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="12" >Ready for Funding</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:40:01-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="9" >Funded</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:40:01-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>0</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>0</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="12" >Ready for Funding</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:40:03-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="In Process" id="9" >Funded</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:43:56-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-01-06-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="Mailed" id="11" >Payment Sent</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T12:43:59-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<state_history>
<failed_reason_code>0</failed_reason_code>
<money_batch_id>824</money_batch_id>
<good_funds_batch_id>1817</good_funds_batch_id>
<network_batch_id>958</network_batch_id>
<state_date>2006-10-24-05:00</state_date>
<state formatted="Check Cashed by Payee" id="2" >Cleared</state>
<trace_number>211170100000003</trace_number>
<record_info>
<creation app="EU" by="9999999" date="2006-02-03T12:38:08-05:00" />
</record_info>
</state_history>
<record_info>
<creation app="BPEL" by="0" date="2006-01-06T11:14:33-05:00" />
<updation app="EU" by="9999999" date="2006-02-03T12:38:08-05:00" />
</record_info>
<research_request>false</research_request>
</payment>
</payload>
<conclusion/>
<state>ASSIGNED</state>
<subState>ASSIGNED</subState>
<processId>ResearchRequestWorkflow</processId>
<processName>ResearchRequestWorkflow</processName>
<processVersion>1.0</processVersion>
<instanceId>2304</instanceId>
<domainId>default</domainId>
<processOwner>bpeladmin</processOwner>
<taskId>0D7B97F1B138EE21E04017AC2B194357</taskId>
<versionReason>Task Created</versionReason>
<taskGroupId/>
<taskType>http://blade-11.payveris.com:9700/orabpel/default/ResearchRequestWorkflow/1.0/taskConfigResearchRequest.xml</taskType>
<identificationKey>PAULA MERRILL, 2069</identificationKey>
<comments/>
<priority>3</priority>
<creator>bpeladmin</creator>
<updatedBy>bpeladmin</updatedBy>
<hasSubTasks>false</hasSubTasks>
<approvers/>
<pattern>SINGLE_APPROVAL</pattern>
<flexString1>1140724383057</flexString1>
<flexString2>PAULA MERRILL</flexString2>
<flexString3>PAULA MERRILL</flexString3>
<flexString4>PaymentId3489</flexString4>
<flexDouble1/>
<flexDouble2/>
<flexLong1/>
<flexLong2/>
<flexDate1/>
<flexDate2/>
<flexDate3/>
<attachment/>
<taskNumber>10240</taskNumber>
<creationDate>2006-02-23T14:53:08.955-05:00</creationDate>
<modifyDate>2006-02-23T14:53:08.955-05:00</modifyDate>
<isGroup>true</isGroup>
<versionNumber>1</versionNumber>
<notm>1</notm>
<expirationDate/>
<expirationDuration/>
</task>
Message was edited by:
gjacobi

I am using oracle.tip.pc.services.hw.task.impl.Task
that object has a toXML method.
To get that object, I am using the RemoteWorklistServiceClient.getWorlistTaskById method.
A word of caution. Not only am I still having the issue above (I had to hack my own WorkflowTask.xsd to make it validate) but I have noticed that the toXML() method actually returns different results when you think it would not. For example, I have something similar to the following code:
task.toXML()
task.toElement()
task.getPayload()
task.toXML()
The first and last toXML methods produce strings that do not match (it adds some empty elements to the end of the document). Weird. Very Weird.
Greg

The view 'cpdpopupeditactionsview' does not exist.

I just installed UCM without any issues as far as I could see, but when I log in as sysadmin at http://localhost/idc/ I always get a popup box saying:
"The view 'cpdpopupeditactionsview' does not exist."
Looking for the cpdpopupeditactionsview string in the UCM installation directory gives me this:
grep -i cpdpopupeditactionsview -R $UCM
$UCM/server/custom/ContentFolios/templates/idc_folio_display.js:          "CpdPopupEditActionsView", idc.folio.display._popupEditActions);
$UCM/server/custom/ContentFolios/templates/idc_folio_display.js:     idc.folio.util.loadFolioView("CpdPopupEditActionsView", null, null, callback);
$UCM/server/weblayout/help/admin/folios_admin/wwhdata/js/search/search0.js:if(x.t("cpdpopupeditactionsview"))y.f("7,1");
$UCM/server/weblayout/help/admin/folios_admin/wwhdata/java/search.xml:<i t="cpdpopupeditactionsview" l="7#1"/>
$UCM/server/weblayout/help/admin/folios_admin/page_1_08.htm:<a name="wp1090240"> </a><div class="pSmartList1"><li>CpdPopupEditActionsView</li></div>
$UCM/server/weblayout/resources/folios/util.js:          "CpdPopupEditActionsView", idc.folio.display._popupEditActions);
$UCM/server/weblayout/resources/folios/util.js:     idc.folio.util.loadFolioView("CpdPopupEditActionsView", null, null, callback);Anyone know why this is happening?
Thanks

Hi
This issue is resolved by manually uninstalling the ContentFolios component via editing the database directly. This only works if the client does not have any ContentFolio data - created or migrated; if they do have existing Content Folio data this will cause great harm to the integrity of their collection.
1. Uninstall the ContentFolios component.
2. Delete the following tables from the database;
CpdArchivedLinks, CpdBasketLinks, CpdChangeHistory, CpdLinks
3. Delete the entry for ContentFolios from the Config table.
4. Restart the Content Server.
5. Install the ContentFolios component.
Hope this helps
Thanks
Srinath

Mail Viewer Window Does Not Open on Launch. Mail Will Not Quit. MAIL BADGER

<UPDATE> After detailing all of the problems below, I discovered that trashing the Mail Badger bundle solved all of the below problems. I am still posting this just in case anybody else has this problem.
Problems:
1. When opening mail.app, the program opens, but it does not launch a Viewer Window. I can open a viewer window manually from the File menu, however.
2. When quitting mail.app, it will not quit. It does not matter whether I hit command-Q, or Mail>Quit Mail, or right-click on dock icon and click Quit. The only way for me to quit is Force Quit. No matter what Quit command I execute, nothing happens. The Viewer Window does not close. (The Viewer Window will close on command, however, either by clicking the red 'x' or by command-W, or by File>Close.
3. Cannot send mail from mail.app. Upon clicking "send" on a new email, it just goes to the Outbox and sits there forever. I can try sending the email again from the Outbox, but nothing happens. (I have 4 gmail accounts, with a couple thousand messages between them. There are no problems with port configurations or smtp servers or anything like that - I am fairly certain anyway because nothing has changed w/ regard to the account settings between the time it was working and the time it stopped working.)
4. After minimizing the Viewer Window, clicking on the mail.app dock icon does not restore the Viewer Window. The only way to restore the Viewer Window is to click on the Viewer window itself in the dock, rather than clicking on the application icon.
Notes: I have installed 10.4.10. I have also installed Safari Beta 3.0.2
I previously installed Safari Beta 3.0, then uninstalled it and upgraded to 3.0.2. I don't recall when the problems started, (under 3.0 or 3.0.2), but they all happened at the same time (rather than one at a time).
I have uninstalled Safari 3 and reverted to Safari 2, but this does not fix the problems.
I have repaired disk permissions.
I have booted from the OS X Install disk and repaired my startup disk.
I have not had any problems with Safari 3 "hanging" on install, thus corrupting the WebKit, as described in other threads.

I had the same issue and resolution. Spotlight search for "Mail Badger" and deleting everything resolves the issue.
I'm also running Safari 3.0.2 and 10.4.10...
I've emailed the developer to let him know about it..
15" MacBook Pro (C2D) SR Mac OS X (10.4.10)

SharePoint 2010 list view - How to filter on a multiline text box field - the view filter does not allow me to select it.

Hi there,
Does someone know in SharePoint 2010 list view - How to filter on a multiline text box field - the view filter does not allow me to select it.
Thanks,

Hi，
Per my knowledge,
it is by design that the data type multiple lines of text can only use “contains” and “begins with” operators.
You can also filter the list view using SharePoint Designer,
Open your list AllItem.aspx page in SPD ->click “Filter” > in “Field Name” select your multipe line of text field, in “Comparison” will displayed four choices.
Best Regards，
Lisa Chen
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Main Viewer Window does not display correctly

Ever since I upgraded to Aperture 3.3 through 3.4.1, the main viewer window does not display correctly. Everything is justified to the right of the screen. When viewing images, the are not in teh center, they are over to the right. I can't even see the import controls when trying to import... actually I can't even press the import button or add metada. I am really in a bad position here. Need help with this... anyone out there have a solution please? my clients are waiting for their photos. Yikes!
Right justified?
No Import Controls?
Faces - Everything displayed in a single row, runs off the end of the right side of the screen

Have a read through this page and follow the directions to delete your application preferences,
Let us know how you go.
Tony
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3805
Message was edited by: Tony Gay

Installed Photoshop Elements 13. Upon activation, get through sign in screen, but when doing serial number validation, validate goes round but does not validate. Connect Later is only way out of screen. How do I validate. Checked account but product n

How do one validate Photoshop 13. (Windows 8) Upon activation, get through to sign in screen, but when doing serial number validation, validate goes round but does not validate. Connect Later is only way out of screen. Checked account but product not listed. Installed with serial number that was sent by Adobe. Have attempted numerous times at different times of the day. On-line connection working.

Have you bothered to do any research at all? Not every app was upgrade to 5.5. Those that weren’t will next be upgraded to CS6.
Bob

"Battery serial does not validate", but the number is within the range

My sister came home from abroad for Christmas, and I checked her PB 12-inch battery serial number. Her battery has the serial number ZZ3480FJPVEA as far as I can see. This falls into the replacement range:
12-inch
iBook G4 A1061 ZZ338 - ZZ427.
On the exchange page, Apple writes: "If the first 5 digits of your battery’s 12-digit serial number fall within the noted ranges, please order a replacement battery immediately." But the battery serial does not validate even if I replace the zero with the letter "O".
Are there batteries within the range that still are ok?
Ingmar
PowerBook G4 12-inch Mac OS X (10.4.8)

I could not post an answer to the topic without marking the question
"answered", though it wasn't!
Strange, because the question is not marked as answered and it is not necessary to mark it in order to reply (simply click on the "reply" link near each post you want to reply to).
However when you feel that your question is answered - or the forum cannot be of further assistance - mark the question as answered and maybe also give some final notes.
If you got helpful replies, then you may award the posters by granting points. You can do so by clicking to "helpful" and "solved" buttons appearing near each post (you need to be logged in).
The buttons mean what they state: "Helpful" in the sense of user gave a useful answer or further information allowing you to solve an issue with some work of your own. "Solved" means that this post of the user is mainly responsible for managing an issue.
You can only mark one posting as "solved" in a thread, and - I hope this is correct - two or three times marking posts as "helpful". With the last, I'm not sure, you may have a look at "Help & Terms of Use".

Digital signature does not validate with the given key

We are switching our single-signon provider from openssl to Weblogic's SAML. I am trying to create a test application that will send mock SAML assertions to our test Weblogic SAML server before we begin integration with the client that will send real SAML assertions.
I have configured a Weblogic 10.3.5 instance to be a SAML Service Provider as well as created an application that creates test SAML assertions to post to the SAML server. I'm currently using a self-signed certificate to sign the SAML assertion. I've imported the self-signed cert into both the DemoIdentiy.jks and cacerts on the Weblogic SAML server.
The Weblogic SAML server is giving the following error when trying to validate the signature of the assertion:
<SAML2Assert: Start verify assertion signature>
<SAML2Assert: The assertion is signed.>
<SAML2Assert: Digital signature does not validate with the given key
org.opensaml.xml.validation.ValidationException: Digital signature does not validate with the given key
at org.opensaml.xml.signature.SignatureValidator.validate(SignatureValidator.java:68)
at com.bea.security.saml2.util.SAML2Utils.verifySamlObjectSignature(SAML2Utils.java:229)
at com.bea.security.saml2.providers.SAML2Assert.verifySignature(SAML2Assert.java:285)
>
I get this error when the SAML assertion includes both the cert and the public key, just the cert, just the public key or neither.
I'm pretty sure I've configured the SAML instance correctly since I followed the steps provided by another group who got this working with a different client. The only difference is they are using a real signed certificate (Verisign i believe) instead of a self signed cert.
I'm looking for any help to track down which step in the process I've missed or implemented incorrectly.
Thanks!
Edited by: 911967 on Feb 6, 2012 12:26 PM

So I found my own answer to the issue. The error was being caused by an the following xml in the assertion:
<ds:Reference URI="">
The value of URI attribute must have a '#' followed by the same value of the ID attribute in the parent 'Assertion' element (in our case a random string):
<saml:Assertion xmlns:saml="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion" ID="a5k42vnhsywezqzyufq15c4bb9xuzeozrmbppj38xe" IssueInstant="2012-03-12T14:33:25.986Z" Version="2.0">
<saml:Issuer>ISSUER_NAME</saml:Issuer>
<ds:Signature xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#">
<ds:SignedInfo>
<ds:CanonicalizationMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#"/>
<ds:SignatureMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#rsa-sha1"/>
*<ds:Reference URI="#a5k42vnhsywezqzyufq15c4bb9xuzeozrmbppj38xe">*
How this is related to the digital signature is beyond me, though I admit I'm very new to saml and digital signing. However I spent a great deal of time investigating my certs and how I was creating the signature, which it seems is unrelated to the actual issue. I also wasn't able to find any docs specifying that this attribute was required, though I might have just missed it.

My pc has win the operating system view, which does not support lightroom 5. I want to buy version 4

My pc has win the operating system view, which does not support lightroom 5. I want to buy version 4?

Thank you, Jim, for your prompt reply. Amazon has it for $151.99, Ebay has a few copies that end up being about as expensive after international shipping and other fees, and I don't trust most of the other sites after reading reviews on them. Looks like I'm going to have to fork out some dollars. How unfortunate.
Thanks again,
Michelle

PCI-GPIB does not like returning from computer power-save mode. I need to restart the application. Uggh! Customer not happy.

It seems volatile memory is lost on the PCI GPIB Card. When the system returns from power-save, I cannot get to my GPIB instruments. I have to close the application and restart it. I've tried unregistering and reregistering the gpib globals and resetting the device interfaces (reissuing the ibdev command) without luck. I am using Visual Basic 6, but I also get the Measurement and Automation Explorer to fail in the same way, so I don't think it is my development environment.

On Sat, 15 May 2004 20:23:58 -0500 (CDT), SQP Products wrote:
>PCI-GPIB does not like returning from computer power-save mode. I
>need to restart the application. Uggh! Customer not happy.
>
>It seems volatile memory is lost on the PCI GPIB Card. When the
>system returns from power-save, I cannot get to my GPIB instruments.
>I have to close the application and restart it. I've tried
>unregistering and reregistering the gpib globals and resetting the
>device interfaces (reissuing the ibdev command) without luck. I am
>using Visual Basic 6, but I also get the Measurement and Automation
>Explorer to fail in the same way, so I don't think it is my
>development environment.
Can you change your power save settings? What operating system
are you running?
Also, some BIOS's have options for power save. For example, recent
IBM's can be set to maintain power to all peripherals, or only to main
memory. Of course, you would want it to maintain power.
I suspect the GPIB board and its driver are completely unable to
handle power save operation. It probably was never considered while
it was being designed.
Aidan Grey

How come the current view button does not work?

How come the current view button does not work?

Sorry, I have no idea what you are asking; please provide some details, and/or a screenshot if possible: https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1070933

Newly added Cal.View Measure does not appear in the BEX Designer

Hi,
anybody come about this :
A newly added Cal.View Measure does not appear in the BEX Designer:
I got a runnig query in Bex Designer, based on a transient InfoProvider which is based on a HANA Calculation View
and
added a new measure to the Calculation View
and
added a Reference InfoObject in the Publisher to the (transient) InfoProvider.
and
see the newly added filed in the Listccube of the(transient) InfoProvider with a technical generated name
and do not
get the newly added measure in the BEX Designer.
Whats wrong ? What needs to be done ?
Thank You
Martin

Hi Martin,
Are you trying to consume the HANA Calc View in BEx Front End Tool - Query Designer.Could you also check the data preview of the Calc View shows the newly added Measure.Check the definition of Calc View under SYS_BIC schema ->Column Views.
Rgds,
Murali

Error: Current provider does not support returning multiple recordsets from a single execution

Hello,
The following piece of code which has been working for the
past five years suddenly started giving me the following error:
Current provider does not support returning multiple recordsets
from a single execution
We have recenlty moved this site to a new server. Could this
error be related to their CFAdmin settings? Eveything else on the
site seems to be working fine. Or am I using an outdated tag or
something?
Any light in this direction is appreciated, thanks.
Here's the code:

There doesn't seem to be anything that seems wrong with the
code. It might have something to do with the Max Pooled Statements
or Number of Connections settings in the CF Administrator, but it
could just as easily have something to do with a setting on the
database. I would check with your provider.

Polymorphic View commit does not validate & returns invalid status

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for