Settlement Response

Hi,
SAP SD CONSULTENTS,
I have a small doubt in payment card settlement. After completion of fcc1 T-code we get one batch number (bsegc-ccbtc).This is called settlement response, for settlement result we required to use another function module CREDIT_CARD_SETTLEMENT_RSP (RFC). Does this function module used in any of T. Codeu2019s or any standard programs .This function module has to hit the destination but there is no link with standard SAP T .Codes & Programs. But I didnu2019t found any standard program or T .code with this function module getting the response from interface (outside system (Non-sap)).
Thanks&Regards.
Butchi Reddy.B

Hi Butchi,
                                                                                The FM you specified is used get Address Result, Address Approval, ZIP Code Result, response code and Settlement Reference No. of Clearing House for payment cards.
FM CREDIT_CARD_SETTLEMENT_RSP is a Remote-Enabled Module hence it has capability to hit the provided destination. In SAP® this function module called in one standard program RFCCSIMU, as Glynn mentioned above. And there is no T. Code to call this FM.
                      If your requirement needs to hit external server then go for the custom program.
            Hope this information helps to suite you requirement.
Best Regards,
Kranthi Kumar V

Similar Messages

Report on Settlement - Project wise/ WBS element wise

Hello Friends,
I am looking for a report on settlement which will include the senders - Projects or WBS elements and Settlement receivers and the amount settled in the any period for a particular fiscal year.
Your response will be rewarded.
Vishal.

Hi,
Pls refer CJIC and CJID.
Regards,
Amit

Error while doing AUC Settlement

Dear All
While doing settlement of Asset using transaction code AIBU, I am getting the following error:
Balance in transaction currency
Message no. F5702
Diagnosis
A balance has occurred in transaction currency 'INR' with the following details:
Exchange rate '00', amount ' 200,000.00' and currency key 'INR'.
The data in the transaction currency were transferred from the calling application.
System Response
Your data cannot be processed in FI.
Procedure
The error is probably in the calling application
Please advice.
Thanks & Regards
Kanwaljit

When you have an asset under construction it should be have an depreciation area in company currecy and when the conrolling area have a different currency the you need an extra depreciation area in the controlling area currency.
In the set up from the currency you have to see if there is a entry for
XXX-INR
INR-XXX

Error: Maintain settlement rule of the sender for a higher level WBS

Hi,
I dont want to maintain the settlement rule for a higher level WBS. How can i configure this in such a way that i dont get the following error:" Maintain settlement rule of the sender" while doing CJ88. Maintaing a separate Settlement profile for a higher level WBS is an option but we are looking if something else could be done The problem is that there are no actuals booked against, say, level 2 WBS but when i execute CJ88, i get the aforesaid error. How can i ensure that only the lowest level WBS ask for the settlement rule and not the levels above it. I have already removed the Investment profile from the higher level WBS but still getting the same error.
Regards,
DPil

Hi,
It is a type Capex WBS and Biling element is not checked. In fact i get a warning while doing the settlement: WBS is neither a billing element nor an account assignment element.
Diagnosis
WBS element is not indicated as either an account assignment element or as a billing element in the master record.
System Response
The WBS element cannot be assigned to an account.
Procedure
Correct your entries or add the missing indicator to the master record for the WBS element.
But this is just a warning. On pressing enter i get the error :Maintain settlement rule of the sender "

Error while Settlement to AUC from Project CJ88

Hi,
ECC 6.00/PSM-BCS
While settling the Project to AUC I am getting the below error. Please advice.
*Asset DAML 000009000004 0000: no subnumber with FM assignment CAPEX / /*
Message no. AW851
Diagnosis
During settlement of sender WBS DAMEPL 1.1.1.1 there was an attempt to settle a posting that has account assignment CAPEX / / (fund/functional area/grant) to an asset subnumber. However, the receiving asset DAML 000009000004 0000 does not have an asset subnumber with this assignment.
System Response
The posting on this sender cannot be settled to an asset subnumber.
Procedure
Either create an asset subnumber with account assignment CAPEX / / for asset DAML 000009000004 0000, or settle to a different receiver.
If this message appears as a warning only, then the posting from this sender is settled to the asset main number.
Fund Capex : CAPEX
Company Code : DAML
WBS Element : DAMEPL 1.1.1.1
Best Regards
Shekhar
Edited by: Chandrashekher Yellapragada on Jun 5, 2010 7:00 PM

I am facing the same error and find this OSS Note 440396 - Missing entries for configurable messages in IS-PS-FM where you can deactivate the error message.
Hope this will solve your issue too.
Regards,
OSS Note 440396
Symptom
System issues messages AW851,AW852,AW856 or AW857 as Error even though
functionality exists to make these configurable.
Other terms
LAIMBFM1, OBA5, AW, AW851, AW852, AW856, AW857
Reason and Prerequisites
Missing entries in tables.
Solution
Create Application Area for Customizable messages for 'AW' using transcation SM30 with view V_T100SA.
Next using transaction SM34, enter view cluster VC_T100S, click maintain and select Application Area AW and double click Messages. Add the following entries:
AppArea     No. Allowed Values     Std     Switch off
AW     851    EWI     E          X
AW     852    EWI     E          X
AW     856    EWI     E          X
AW     857    EWI     E          X
Afterwards with Transaction OBA5 insert the entries for the messages you want to customize, and set them to the error level the behaviour should be for your particular case.

Error when reversing settlement back to Auc - Balance in transaction curren

Hi,
We get following error when reversing a settlement from asset back to Auc (using AIST):
FI/CO interface : Balance in transaction currency
Message No. RW022
This error only occurs when we settle a portion of the amount sitting in AuC and not the full amount. (When we settle full amount in AuC to final asset we can reverse no problem).
When we do a partial settlement to final asset, SAP creates a document and in that document it posts a debit and credit for the unsettled amount e.g. 50k in Auc and we settle 45k to final asset with 5k remaining in Auc - the document looks as follows
AuC     5,000.00-
Auc      5,000.00
AuC    45,000.00
Final Asset    25,000.00-
Final Asset    20,000.00-
The 5k above is the unsettled amount still sitting in AuC
When we try reverse we get error message RW022 and detail is as follows:
    The balances in transaction currency must be zero for each logical
    transaction when transferring to the FI/CO interface. A balance of "
    5,000.00-" "CAD" was determined for the logical transaction "AZVZ".
System Response
    The FI/CO interface does not process any transactions which have a
    balance in transaction currency other than zero.
Procedure
    This is a system error of the calling application.
Note: We do use line item settlement in asset classes
Much appreciate any help..

Hello,
You may need to check SAP notes below regarding this issue:
1523814   Transaction AIST ends with error RW 022
1514384   Error message RW 022 after Note 1444750 implem
1444750   Postings without transaction currency
I hope it helps.

Settlement message in service project settlement

Hi,
I am having issue during period end closing. Settlement say no accrued amount found for settlement. But when I see report project has the following values,
(rev)-2000
(cost)1500
Total= -500
Should these costs/ rev need to be settled some where as a period end closing? If yes then where? CJB2 generates profitability segment rule.
Do I need to run WIP before settlement? Project is already billed. (When I go there WIP shows this error 'KJ217 revenue are not planned')
When I do not bill customer only charge employee hours in project. WIP shows value and allow executing. And so the Settlement of project. So can settle expanses to PA and see report.
Addition Info:
We are creating projects from contract. There are services provided to customer in this particular scenario.
We are assigning employee hours from CATS and activity planning from CJR2 on WBS.
Billing customer using RRB and creating billing doc and invoice from there.
WBS has RA key assigned for RRB
Settlement rule automatically generate rule to settle in PA segment.

Thanks you for the quick response. When I run KKA2 it gives me the following message:
"Planned revenue for valuation is zero". I already have revenue planned in the project from cj42.
Please explain
Thanks

Error in Evluated Receipt settlement (ERS)

Dear Team,
system is showing error as " Enter section code and Business Place" while i m trying to settle invoice with t-code MRRL.
i have flaged the ERS check box for this vendor and inforecord is also maintained for material vendor combination. tax code mention is VO- Zero input tax and ERS tab is appearing at item level in PO. please let me know where can i maintain this section code and business area for MRRL transation... thanks to all in advance
Vijay

thanks guys for your response i got it... actually system asks for section code and business area details if your vendor is subjected to withholding tax... so for this just go to vendor master and remove liable for withholding tax for this vendor and try you will not get any error...
thanks to all...
Vijay

No. range issue : at the time of production order settlement

Hi expert,
My user is unable to settle production order due no no range issue:
Short text of error message:
Document number 9000 20001 2008 was already assigned
Technical information about the message:
Diagnosis
     Document number 20001 in company code 9000 and fiscal year
     already been assigned.
System response
     Termination of processing.
Procedure
     Check document number range 02 in company code 9000 and fi
     2008 and correct the number range status if necessary.
Message classe...... "F5"
Number.............. 152
Variable 1.......... 9000
Variable 2.......... 20001
Variable 3.......... 2008
Variable 4.......... 02
Variable 3.......... 2008
Variable 4.......... 02
Pl advise.
Regards,
Samar

Hi experts,
Thaks for the reply.
Pl advise what is the configuration/T code to be maintained for no range
Regards,
Samar

Asset Settlement : Tax Error

Hello Friends,
We are settling one AUC asset . For that we have followed these steps
1 ) AIAB : AuC Assignment of Dist. Rule
These are ok
2 ) AIBU : Transfer Asset under Const.
It is giving Tax error
"Tax code in procedure is invalid "
Message no. FF704
Diagnosis
The tax code entered is not defined in the company code country.
System Response
Procedure
Check and, if necessary, correct the entry.
Procedure for System Administration
If it is not an input error, check and possibly change the system settings.
To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
1. Check whether the required tax procedure has been allocated to the company code country. The Procedure field is on the detailed screen.
2. If you need a new tax code, you can create one yourself.
Please suggest me a solution .
Regards
Nilesh Vakil

Thanks for the reply ,
I have checked the setting in the OBBG and OBCL and they are ok . I am able to post the AUC in the development server where settings are same as production . Please suggest me a solution .
regards
Nilesh vakil

FI-AA: Unable to settle costs off of AUC

In Depreciation area 01 (Book Depreciation), planned/posted values were recorded on an AUC via settlement from WBS Elements during FY 2006.
In Depreciation area 80 (Insurance Values), planned/posted values were recorded on an AUC via settlement from WBS Elements during FY 2006. Planned depreciation values are calculated and post as Non-Insurable value on the AUC during FY 2006.
In FY 2007, all values posted to the associated WBS Element are journal entried off to another WBS Element and the AUC is zeroed out once the settlement from the WBS Element has posted. The Non-Insurable value has been carried forward to FY 2007 and remains on AUC.
In FY 2008, an AMR is created. Both Settlement to AMR for Current Year and Settlement to AMR for Prior Year are executed but the Non-Insurable value still remains on the AUC. This has prevented us from Closing the WBS Element and deactivating the AUC.
I'm assuming that when you execute Settlement to AMR - Prior Year that it only goes back and looks at the previous FY and not all previous years, which is why the Non-Insurable value remains on the AUC.
I need to clear this Non-Insurable value, which was posted two years ago, off the AUC so that we can Close the WBS Element. Any ideas on how to do that?
Also when it comes to AMR creation, is it common practice to create the AMR at the same time the AUC is created or at least have the AMR created by the end of the next FY? In our situation above I think if we would have created the AMR in FY 2007 and executed Settlement to AMR - Prior FY in FY 2007 we not have encountered this problem.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks for the response.
Note 425601, if I'm reading it correctly, explains how to settle costs posted in previous years from the WBS Element to an AUC.
In my situation all costs have been settled from the WBS Element. I have an AUC that has costs on it from two years ago that I don't know how to settle to an AMR. This preventing us from Closing the WBS Element.

Automatic settlement rule creation

Hello Guru's,
I have a scenario of capital proejcts. Were I create Assets with the help of Investment profile at the top(1st level) WBS element. Now my requirment is the cost of the second level WBS should be rolled upto top level WBS element. To do this I have to manually create settlement rule for all second level WBS to settle at top level. I have to create this rule automatically throught CBJ2 tcode.
As per SAP Note 211324 I have Implemented the modification. Now I have Insert value '5' with short text 'Superior WBS element'. Also have assign the strategy to Acct. Assign element. This strategy is also assigned to settlement profile. Also have assigned this settleemnt profile to project profile.
Now, when i run CJB2 tcode for my project the system issues me an error :-
Error(s) during creation of settlement rule
Message no. ORB509
Diagnosis
Errors occurred during the check on settlement receivers.
System Response
Processing stopped.
Procedure
Check whether the:
Specific receiver Account assignment e actually exists
Settlement profile ZPI03 permits account assignment to the specified receiver
Please throw some light on this error
Regards,
Tushar

Thanks Virendra,
Thanks for your reply but tell me after the implementation of note do I need to implement BADI also as in past for some forums you have mentioned???
Regards,
Tushar

Error during automatic settlement rule creation

Hi Gurus,
For the investment project, I maintained as follows, first level WBSE - Only planning element - no settlement. 2nd level WBSE - settled to AuCs. For level three & below settled to Superior WBSE. I had created the Settlement type with '5'. When I am executing CJB2 to create the Settlement rules automatically, I am getting the following error message for level 3 & below WBSE.
Enter a valid value for the settlement type :
Message no. KD199
Diagnosis
The system found a settlement type settlement type in the settlement rule which either does not exist or is unsuitable for the sender.
Procedure
If possible, enter a suitable settlement rule. Remember that the rules for preliminary settlement ("PRE") of capital investment measures are different from those for period settlement ("PER") of other settlement senders. Periodic settlement only makes sense for capital investment measures. They must not have any "PER" rules.
To enter an investment profile (in the control data for an order or WBS element) or to remove it. However, first delete the PER or PRE rules (in the settlement rule) and er zu in internal orders, you can first change the investment profile and then adapt the rules before you save.
Error(s) during creation of settlement rule :
Message no. ORB509
Diagnosis
Errors occurred during the check on settlement receivers.
System Response
Processing stopped.
Procedure
Check whether the:
Specific receiver Account assignment e actually exists
Settlement profile Z7 permits account assignment to the specified receiver
can anyone help me where I am making mistake or what is the procedure to be adopted for such scenario.
somebody else also had discussed the same issue in this forum but there is no answer for this.
thanks in advance
Vinodh

hi Sreenivas,
Thanks for your reply,
I tried this, system is giving the following error now
Could not find a superior WBS element for WBS element
Message no. CJ115
Diagnosis
The system could not find a superior element for a WBS element while it was executing the function 'Derive structure'
System Response
Processing stopped.
What could be the reason ?
thanks in advance,
Vinodh

PROBLEM IN SETTLEMENT CO88 - G/L 7000203 cannot be created as a co element

Dear friends,
I am facing with an error. Kindly suggest the way how to come up with the issue.
My Client due to some reason passed an JV in the month of december in PRD.
Now after this all the settlement for the next periods are in error. The following is the error while executing CO88.
G/L account 7000203 cannot be created as a cost element
Message no. KQ119
Diagnosis
When maintaining the posting rules for passing on results analysis data to Financial Accounting, you entered a G/L account that is defined as a primary cost element in cost and revenue element accounting. This is not allowed. You must enter a G/L account in the posting rules that is not defined as a cost element.
System Response
The entry invalid.
Procedure
You have the following options:
Enter a G/L account for which no cost element is specified in Cost and Revenue Element Accounting.
You can change the message type with user-defined error management (transaction OPR4_KKA). What should be observed when you enter a G/L account in a posting rule that is defined as a primary cost element in Cost and Revenue Element Accounting? You need to define a CO account assignment so that the posting defined in the posting rule can be executed. You do this with transaction OKB9 (default account assignment) or OKC9 (substitution), or using the default account assignment in the cost element master.
I even tried to create make default the COST CENTER in OKB9 for that cost element as stated in the message itself but still the problem exist. I got another suggestion. Firstly i will transfer the values in new GL a/c, and make the necessary config changes in OKG8 with the new GL a/c.
can somebody guide me whether i am on the right way or is there any work around possible.
regards,
sandeep jain

Hi Sandeep,
In Transaction OKG8 the GL account for P&L(7000203) should not be a cost element. I dont know how it was allowing you all this while.
Try assigning another P&L account without a cost element.
Keep us posted on the progress please.
Thanks
Naveen

Cost of sales not getting generated during final settlement of refurbishment order

Hi
We use refurbishment Order and we have settlement receiver as PSG. We use RA Key. We use raw material components CE 1, , We confirm debit labor,
we also receive Revenue cost element category 11 .
We have RA key assigned in the Order.
Now We ran and save values of RA and run KO88 and Dr. WIP Cr. Cons offset is credited. this is when the status is REL and when the status is TECO, then we calculate RA and run KO88 RA is reversed. Now COGS is not getting populated at all and there is no CO PA document also. Kindly let me know the configuration needed for this purpose. I need this very urgently.
This is a simple scenario and this no connection with SD as of now.
Aparaajith

Hi Szymon
We have 3 types of refurbishment order type
1. External Consulting services
Here the cost of labor, consulting charges are booked against this service order
Since the job is done more than 2 months then at the end of 1st month WIP is calculated
2nd month job is done -TECO, so the reverse WIP and cost of Sales comes into play.
Here they book revenue against the service order. Since MTO is not used here, based on status of the order TECO, they create billing request and billing where service order is the cost object
So Service Orders hold costs 2nd month end rev and cost.
My problem is the RA what I use does not create Cost of Sales automatically I know there is some configuration is wrong.
2nd issue: CO PA does not get created when I do TECO and consequently I am unable to move sales and cost of sales to copa.
2. third party repair
Here there is no link between sales order and refurbishment order.
So no revenue is booked for this refurbishment order
Next they issue material and move to WIP and 2nd month they move the cost to COS ,reverse WIP>
I use a RA key which does move COS creation of entry.
This is my problem
How to move to COS without revenue and I will create manually 2nd month by using a report to take TECO status and then create revenue entries through SD.
I need response very soon, if you can give me.
Aparaajith

Settlement Response

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for