Ship To Address issue due to HR replication

Hello All,
We are in SRM 7.0 SP2.
We have integraed HR org structure to SRM Org structure.
There was a change in the HR org structure at the root level, which resulted in SRM root level Org structure with a different Business Partner number.
In SRM Org structure we have many attributes at the root level, and we have created many ship to address against the old Business partner.
Now with this change there is only Company address available.
Is there a way where we can assign the old ship to adress which we had created earlier to assign to the

Hi Muthu
The problem is that all PR items are being sent to SRM with a default Ship to Address instead of the Ship to Address described for each item in the PR.
After some investigation we found out that this address comes from the Purchasing Organization default address wich can be seen through PPOMA_BBP (address tab at Purchasing Organization level).
So, this is the first problem. Items are arriving in SRM with wrong Ship to Address and buyer must correct all of them manually, wich is terrible and unacceptable for the end user.
Trying to fix this palliatively, we've maintained a few different Ship to Address in SRM so that buyer can create a PO in SRM (through Sourcing Cockpit) and then change the address for the PO items using search help instead of keep filling in all address fields for Ship to Address.
By doing this we found a second issue while choosing one of these address already maintained in the system. The main name for the address (wich can be seen in the PO partner tab view) shows the Purchasing Organization name, instead of c/o name defined in the address. Therefore user can not know wich is the address choosen for each item unless he opens the address details for all items since all address are indexed to the same Purchasing Organization and therefore to the same address name.
Mainly what we need to know is how to make Ship to Address described for the items in PR comes exactly the same to SRM instead of the default address.
Thanks for your support.
Regards,
Evandro Miasato

Similar Messages

Ship to address issue in PRD

Hi Experts,
This is my Issue,i have given bello please any one give me solution for this.......
In TST, when a user makes a change to an order's ship-to address, the changes are "triggering" a delta record into the delta tables for BI to extract. This can be seen via tcode rsa3's delta tester.
In PRD, when the user makes the exact same change, nothing is added to the delta table and the changes never come over to BI unless a full extract is request for the order.
What is the difference between TST client and PRD client?
Thanks & Regards,
Reddy.

I have checked in data source but there they have selected Direct Delta...If we select direct delta we dont need to do v3 job right.
Please let me know what is the solution for this..
Thanks & Rehgards,
Msr.

SRM Ship to Address Issue

Hello,
I have I issue with Ship-to-Address,
I am doing the shop on behalf for one of the user and found that ship-to- Address is not defaulting in the screen
After investigation I found that..the issue looks with S (Postion)
Below is the error
Address 0000255036 already exists: creation not possible
Message no. R1626
Any idea thx.
Thx,
Jai
Edited by: M Jairaj on Dec 12, 2011 9:42 PM

Are we maintaining Ship-to-address other than PPOMA_BBP (delivery Address)
The reason I am asking is I am getting the below error and I am not able to find the address screen
Address 0000255036 already exists: creation not possible
Message no. R1626

Ship to Address issue

Dear Experts,
I have 3 different locations (Chennai,Hyderabad,Delhi) from which the Purchase Order is getting raised. Each location has few vendors and in master data we have marked the relevant location oriented ship to address.
In Purchase document ship to address defaults from the company details, is there anyway i can default it from the BP Master Data as i have 3 different locations?
Awaiting your response
Edited by: Sanbrahma39 on Apr 21, 2010 3:53 PM

hi i
I did not get ur question properly where do u want the ship to address is it on pld if that correct than teher is a a ship to address in BP u can get that in the PLD or the second way could be if there are three locations then there would be different warehouse for each of them and as a result u can pull te warehouse address in the pld. Just want to inform u that warehouse address cannot be directly flown in to pld for that u would have to maintain a UDF where the warehouse address would come up with Fmsand tehh u can pull this udf in the pld
Regards,
Manish

Purchase Order ship to Address issue

Hi,
I am modifying the PO sap script. I don't want to display title field in the ship-to address. when i debug the script the ship-to address is coming from following code. I am not understanding the code...what is this ADDRESS DELIVERY means ?
IF &PEKKO-ADRNR(K)& NE ' '
ADDRESS DELIVERY PARAGRAPH ZK
ADDRESSNUMBER &PEKKO-ADRNR(K)&
FROMCOUNTRY &LFA1-LAND1&
ENDADDRESS
<REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
Thanks,
fractal
Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Mar 17, 2008 7:23 PM

Hi,
IF &PEKKO-ADRNR(K)& NE ' '
ADDRESS DELIVERY PARAGRAPH ZK
ADDRESSNUMBER &PEKKO-ADRNR(K)&
FROMCOUNTRY &LFA1-LAND1&
ENDADDRESS
The Address is printing based on PEKKO-ADRNR(Address Number) number and LFA1-LAND1 (country Specific).
If you want to remove Title, Use the Manual Code Instead of using Address and EndAddress.
manual code means
Write one external subroutine and get the require fileds(like name1, name2, Street, City, Zipcode) from ADRC rable based on Address Number (PEKKO-ADRNR)
and then display it one by one( as per your required format)
Thanks
Sekhar.

Issue in Ship To Address.. URGENT

Hi All,
We added Ship to Address Form in Ship To Page in iStore . 115.10.2
If I click on 'Continue Checkout' button , then it redirects to same page wiht the following errors
Address Line 1 is required Field and
Province is Required Field
Please any one help me in this regards, this is very high priorty issue for me
Thanks

To my knowledge iStore is a JSP based Application where most of the coding is in Java or JSP. I dont think the issue is related to OA Framework.
Coming back to your case, you would need to check the code that gets triggerred on click of the Continue button. From a functional point, you need to enter the required fields mentioned before proceeding. So it doesnt look like an issue at all.
Regards
Sumit

Issue in Canada Ship To Address.. URGENT

Hi All,
We added Ship to Address Form in Ship To Page in iStore . 115.10.2
If I click on 'Continue Checkout' button , then it redirects to same page wiht the following errors
Address Line 1 is required Field and
Province is Required Field
Please any one help me in this regards, this is very high priorty issue for me
Thanks

Hi Kumar/ALL,
you can set the "Client side validation" to true for th button , then it will work.
How Can I do this above task. Here my code functionality is mentioned below
If i click on 'continue checkout' button then it goes to processing page.
Continue Checkout Button display style -->
<TD>
<SCRIPT language=JavaScript>
buttonGen("<%=mmi.getMessage("IBE_PRMT_SC_CONT")%>", "javascript:checkNeedToUpdateInfo('')");
</SCRIPT>
</td>
--------------------------------------End button
<FORM method="post" action="<%=actionUrl%>" name="parentFormWithCartLineInfo" onsubmit="checkNeedToUpdateInfo('');">
Javascript function : checkNeedToUpdateInfo
function checkNeedToUpdateInfo(buttonClicked){
var windowForm = document.parentFormWithCartLineInfo;
var needToUpdateFlag = windowForm.elements['needToUpdateFlag'].value;
if (needToUpdateFlag != 'true')
if (windowForm.elements['shipmentId'].value == '')
needToUpdateFlag = 'true';
else if (windowForm.elements['shippingMethodOrig'].value == '')
needToUpdateFlag = 'true';
else if (windowForm.elements['shiptoCustAccountIdOrig'].value != windowForm.elements['shiptoCustAccountId'].value)
needToUpdateFlag = 'true';
<%
if (IBEUtil.useFeature("IBE_USE_SHIPPING_INSTRUCTIONS"))
%>
/*else if (windowForm.elements['reqDelDate'].value != windowForm.elements['reqDelDate'].defaultValue)
needToUpdateFlag = 'true';
else if (windowForm.elements['shippingInstr'].value != windowForm.elements['shippingInstr'].defaultValue)
needToUpdateFlag = 'true';
else if (windowForm.elements['packingInstr'].value != windowForm.elements['packingInstr'].defaultValue)
needToUpdateFlag = 'true';
<%
%>
else if (windowForm.elements['shiptoContactPartyIdOrig'].value != windowForm.elements['shiptoContactPartyId'].value)
needToUpdateFlag = 'true';
else if (windowForm.elements['shiptoPartySiteIdOrig'].value != windowForm.elements['shiptoPartySiteId'].value)
needToUpdateFlag = 'true';
else if (windowForm.elements['shiptoPartySiteIdDB'].value != windowForm.elements['shiptoPartySiteId'].value)
needToUpdateFlag = 'true';
else
var dropDownValue = 'ship_method';
var checkDropDown = windowForm.elements[dropDownValue];
if (checkDropDown != null)
for (var i=0; i < windowForm.elements[dropDownValue].length; i++)
if (windowForm.elements[dropDownValue].options.selected == true)
if (windowForm.elements[dropDownValue].options[i].defaultSelected == false)
needToUpdateFlag = 'true';
break;
windowForm.elements['needToUpdateFlag'].value = needToUpdateFlag;
if (buttonClicked == '')
windowForm.LineLevelButtonPressed.value = 'UPDATEINFO';
else
windowForm.LineLevelButtonPressed.value = buttonClicked;
windowForm.submit();
return true;
and Address Form View Source:
<a name='ADDRESS_STYLE.ARRemit_Address_HZ'></a>     <td><input type="hidden" name="ADDRESS_STYLE.ARRemit_Address_HZ" id='ADDRESS_STYLE.ARRemit_Address_HZ' size=30 value="UAA">     </td>

<input type='hidden' name='ADDRESS_STYLE.ARRemit_Address_HZ.bak' value='UAA'>

<tr>
<a name='ADDRESS1.ARRemit_Address_HZ'></a>     <td noWrap Align='right' class="prompt" rowSpan="0">
          <span class='requiredFieldAsterisk'>*</span>
          <label for='ADDRESS1.ARRemit_Address_HZ'>Address Line1   </label>
     </td>
     <td width='5' class='null'>      </td>
     <td noWrap rowSpan="0" colSpan="1" >
          <input
               type="text"
               name="ADDRESS1.ARRemit_Address_HZ"
               id='ADDRESS1.ARRemit_Address_HZ'
               size=35
               maxlength=240
               value=""
               onChange="JavaScript:checkNeedToUpdateFlexInfo();;">
     </td>
and Address Line2 , city, province.. etc.
Please let me know how can I disable client side validation
Please help me in this regard.
Thanks
HTH

Commerical inovice output ship-to/bill-to address issue

Hi Guru,
We are having a issue about the address on the output of commercial inovice for STO delivery.
e.g.
Plant A - Delivering plant
Plant B - Receiving plant
1. Create a STO - B purchasing 100 piece of material_1 from A.
2. Then create a Delivery with reference to this STO;
3. Use the customize program to print the commercial invoice.
The issue is that we have 2 customer id for plant B.
100001 is using the company's sales office address, work as a bill-to party.
200001 is using our distribution center address, work as a ship-to party.
The output will display bill-to address and ship-to address. but currently we have a issue that this output use 100001 as the bill-to and ship-to address.
We want to use 200001 as the ship-to address. From the code, the output will pick the ship-to party's address on the delivery as the ship-to address.
Anyone can tell me how to fix this issue?
thanks

Hi All,
Happy New Year,
We use ME27 to create the STO, there is only delivery plant and receiving plant filled in during creation.
After that we can use ME22N to change the STO. but I can't find the ship-to party field in the STO.
Following is some pics about the shipping information of STO, Please advise,
1. Delivery Address Tab - Item: // This address is correct, shows 200001's address.
<a href="http://tu.6.cn/pic/show/id/2041312">[img]http://i3.6.cn/cvbnm/60/ff/ee/415b90544504575d425174f94c440b17.jpg[/img]</a>
2. Shipping Tab in Item Level:
<a href="http://tu.6.cn/pic/show/id/2041314">[img]http://i3.6.cn/cvbnm/c7/e3/69/6204cca510480f9c2c3b9b57a39a3ce9.jpg[/img]</a>
3. Partner Functions in Header Level - Partner Tab
<a href="http://tu.6.cn/pic/show/id/2041313">[img]http://i3.6.cn/cvbnm/3b/02/14/326a8f450dd3f696b8a01a964702ef5d.jpg[/img]</a>
The Question here is:
1. The delivery address in STO is correct, whether it will be copied to Delivery I created with reference to STO?
2. We didn't find the ship-to party in the STO. So the ship-to party of Delivery is not coming from STO How to determine the ship-to party in Delivery?
Thank you very much for your help.
Edited by: Rick Guan on Jan 6, 2009 2:39 AM

Ship-to address line item issue in ISA

We're facing a problem regarding ship-to addresses when placing orders in the B2C scenario of the ISA with a CRM backend. When an order is placed, the ship-to address is correctly populated in the header of the order. However, in the line items, this does not reflect. Instead, the ship-to value is the partner's standard address (the address used for bill-to and sold-to).
This occurs intermittently, and is inconsistent across the same partner, delivery address and line items: most of the time the correct behaviour will occur with a given combination, but from time to time the problem manifests with that same combination.
I realise this is a vague description, but would appreciate it if someone could suggest a direction of enquiry, or has any ideas. We are struggling to determine what could be causing these identical inputs to have divergent effects.

Hi James,
I have seen a similar problem in CRM ISA 4.0 on an early SP. It was however rectified in further patch releases. Please check in SAP OSS for updates.
Regards,
Ashok.

Monitor the changes of Ship to address in Sales Order

Hi,
My client has an requirment which they would like to monitor whether the ship-to-address has been modified after the order were save.
e.g.
Sold-to 12345
Ship-to 12356
SAVE the order
After the order are sale and sometime later, the user went in VA02 and update the ship-to-address to 23456
now
sold-to 12345
ship-to 23456
It there anyway we can have a report to check if the ship-to has been changes?
thanks,
Rebella

Hello Rebella,
The best option of monitering the changes incurred fro the Ship-to-Party details of a SALES ORDER are as follows:
If you are interested to pick up the information of changes values of Ship-To-Party from a Sales Order then i think you can use the table VBPA. This table will contain the updated value of Ship-To-Party partner function of a Sales Order.
Second option would be to use a program which actually run when you open a Sales Order in VA03 --> Environment --> Changes. You can develop a t-code which shall call this program.
You can also use the T-code AUT10 for tracking changes for a Sales Order.
Hope these infotmation helps you in resolving your issue and please don't forget to mark your thread as closed.
Regards,
Sarthak

Error while updating Ship to Address on Sales Order form

hi ,
A user is trying to update the ship to address on a standard sales orders screen, this is pretty common and never caused any issues. However with one particular order the user gets the following error :
"You cannot update Ship To Location; the standard value rule set prevents override. "
This is an Oracle shipped message and not custom code. The message name is OE_SEC_UPDATE_VIOLATION whose text is : You cannot update &ATTRIBUTE; &REASON
Seems like REASON is the message : OE_SEC_SV_VIOLATION, whose text is
" the standard value rule set prevents override. "
This is a message shipped by Oracle Order entry. I am not able to locate this message since the oracle shipped files are not available to us and this is not in any database code(i searched the code)
Does anyone know when this message is thrown. It seems like some value set error but am not able to figure out where it is being set.
Any help in this will be appreciated.
Thanks

Did you check if any Processing rule is defined for Ship to location update :
Setup> Rules > Security > Processing constraint ?
Maybe this order matches condition that prevents this field from being updated.

Wondershare's iDraft for $2.99 will not update crashing issues due to 4.2!

Wondershare will not update their iDraft App, on the App Store, for compatibility issues due to iOS 4.2! iDraft costs $2.99, and should be pulled from the app store. An app should not be sold, until the issue is addressed. It's wrong, and I want to see some progress, instead of emails saying that we are heading in a different direction... Then return email back saying that we are now working on the issue, and I could get a discount on Wondershare apps...
Wondershares response to fix the Crashing issues for iDraft...
(1st Response)
"Dear Customer,
Thanks for contacting us. This is Ivan from support team.
Currently iDraft does not support iOS 4.2, and we do not provide future upgrades for this product due to our company long-term blueprint.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
We are now working on a new application on Android platform.
Just let me know if you have any question."
(2nd Response)
"Dear Customer,
I am very sorry for the trouble.
We have temporary paused the future upgrades of this product, but never permanently give up it.
And we are focused on another product which we hope it can bring more fun to all iPad users.
I have forwarded your message to our R&D department, and we will look into this case and improve the software performance.
As compensation, we can offer you an extra 20% off if you are interested on any product on our official site. Just let me know the product name.
Let me know if you have any question."
(3rd Response)
"Dear Customer,
I am very sorry for the trouble.
Currently iDraft does not support iOS 4.x, we are now working on the update.
If you don't mind, I recommend you wait for next upgrade.
I will send a message to you as soon as we launch it.
Or you may contact Apple for refund if you prefer. We would like to offer you a refund but we are not able to do it, there is no refund option in vendor's portal."
I have reported the issue to Apple, and thought this may be of interest to you guys as well.
Your Thoughts?

Welcome to Apple Support Communities
Snow Leopard is a paid upgrade. http://support.apple.com/kb/sp575 Call Apple to buy Snow Leopard. Then, make a backup, insert the DVD and upgrade. When it finishes, open  > Software Update

Purchase Order - Default Ship-To Address

Hello,
We are trying to change our default ship-to address for our PO's in SAP but we are having issues. Even though we have changed the default ship-to address in the Business Partner Card, the Ship-To address field still appears as "DC, USA" which is not even the full address listed in the Admin>Company Details field. Is there another "warehouse" default ship-to field somewhere that we are missing? Please advise on how to change our default ship-to address for all PO's moving forward. Thank you.
Best,
Matthew Siegfried
Sherbrooke Cellars

Dear,
Check the below threads:
Help Required in Ship To Address in Purchase Order
Vendor ship to address
Purchase Orders Ship to Addresses
hope this will help you.
Neetu

Document Search - ship to address search help

All,
We are extended classic scenario (7.01 SP 10).
When we go to Document Search - for Purchase Orders and we pick Ship To Address - it provides us with a list of all the ship to addresses - instead of allowing us to enter some selection criteria. When I click on Product Category it allows us to enter search criteria as you can see from the print screen below. For Ship To Address - it provides the list of all plants instead of a pop-up box to narrow down the search. How do we get a search help for the Ship To Address?
Thanks
Sandra

Hello Sandra,
i do not understand your issue.
In SRM standard, for SC or PO, search-help is available to look for delivery address
Shopping Cart:
Purchase Order:
You can find which search-help is used in the Web Dynpro Component context.
It is BBP_BUPA_CLL_PARTNER for PO and BBP_ADDR_BUPA_SHIPTO for SC.
Regards.
Laurent.

Problem in Overwriting SHIP-TO-ADDRESS at itme level.

Hi Experts,
We are facing problem in Overwriting SHIP-TO-ADDRESS at itme level.
Issue : Item level ship to address cannot be overwritten when item and header shipping is same.
if item and header shipping address different then item shipping address can be overwritten.
Can any one help me to solve this issue.?
What are all the function modules / BADIs used for handling the shipping address..?
Regards,
Murugan Arumugam.

Hello Murugan,
Sorry for the late reply, but changing ship-to party address at item level is standard behaviour in the B2B webshop. Yes, there was a bug in CRM ISA v4.0 when a change to the header level ship-to party address didn't flow through to an already available item ship-to party address but only to newly added items. This was rectified in newer versions of ISA / eCommerce.
Cheers,
Ashok.

Ship To Address issue due to HR replication

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for