Ship to party - condition type
Hi experts, pls help solve. Thx.
Issue: The system pops up the msg below when using another ship to party.
"Pricing error: Mandatory condition MWSI is missing
Message no. V1801".
Background: Another ship to party is created by using VD01, i.e. only "shipping" need to be maintained in sales area data.
If ship to party is the same as sold to party, no such an error msg occurs. U know, they are created by using XD01 for this case.
MWSI is reference to MWST.
Dear Cathy,
You would have maintained MWSI as the mandatory in your Pricing Procedure in T. Code: V/08 .
If the system needs to retrieve the record automatically, then you need to create the Condition Record in T. Code: VK11.
(Make sure that the Tax classifications that you maintain in your customer and material master datas exist in your condition record together with you tax code that you wish to use).
Then you will not get the error messg in sales order.
Best Reagrds,
Amit
Note: Also, in T. Code: V/06 --> Condition Type: MWSI --> Go to Details-Screen --> Go to Tab: manual enteries can be changed
There you can see manual entries feild as "D" change it "C"; so that the time creation of sales order, if you get the same error you can enter manually.
Check in XD02 --> Sales Area Data --> Billing Documents --> Tax Classification;
for the relevant customer (obviously this fixes it from then onwards).
Also, Check whether Shipping Plant is getting detemined in to Sales Order-Line Item.
If still doesn't work, go to
T. Code: VA02
Display one transaction for which MWSI is indeed missing, Go to Tab: Conditions, and click on Analysis, go to your MWSI condition type, this might help us determine why your MWSI is not properly proposed by the system.
Similar Messages
-
Hi Gurus,
I am working on freight related condition type,my requirement is we have to calculate freight cost based on Delivery Item (per PC) / Volume of that Material (Per PC) and Destination Region of each Delivery Order.
for example:
If Material '100001' has volume = 1 M3 per PC and Destination region code (in Delivery Order) is '20'. The Freight cost is 1 USD per PC.
If Material '100001' has volume = 1 M3 per PC and Destination region code is '22'. The Freight cost is 1.5 USD per PC.
If Material '100002' has volume = 1.5 M3 per PC and Destination region code is '20'. The Freight cost is 2 USD per PC.
If Material '100002' has volume = 1.5 M3 per PC and Destination region code is '22'. The Freight cost is 3 USD per PC.
I'm try to set calculation type = 'T - Multi-dimensional' and having 2 Scale Basis as following:
Scale Basis = 'F - Volume'
Scale Basis = 'L7 - Region of Destination'
but it result in error in calculation when creating Shipment cost document.
I don't sure whether my understanding on Multi-dimensional scale is correct or not. Please kindly help.
Thank You in Advance for every idea.I think, from your example, if you maintain condition record with the combination of Destination Region Code and Material, it will work, provided, your freight condition type has Calculation Type as "C".
So your condition record would be
100001 / 20 = 1USD per PC
G. Lakshmipathi -
Output type is not getting triggered for ship to party in shippment output
Hi,
we have maintained output determination procedure for shipments. It was working fine.
We have just added new condition table to access sequence, and maintained the condition records also for condition type ZABC. I have checked in NACE, Application V7, I am able to find the condition type. checked in VV73, condition records displayed. But in VT02N/VT03N, we are unable to get print for the output type.
Why this is happening? we are able to see the procedure, condition type, access sequence, condition records in place ...why condition type ZABC is not getting triggered in the shipment output.
Please advise and let me know if you need more details....thanks in advance.
Thanks,
SSHi Noel,
Thanks for your time and reply.
We have output determination procedure for shipments, condition type ZABC, Access sequence ZABC, Condition tables 550,600,650,700 already maintained. output is working fine.we have a new requirement and created new condition table 700 with the fields" Ship to party and transportation planing point "(Condition table 700 ). we assigned the condition table 700 to access sequence ZABC. Condition type ZABC already placed in Output determination procedure.
We test the output, new condition record is not triggering in the output, even in output determination analysis also, we are unable to see the record 700 for the condition type ZABC. we are not sure what is the reason for the condition table that is not picking up ? Why condition type ZABC with condition record 700 not visible in output determination analysis.
I have checked condition records, output determination procedure. Please advise and let me know you need more details.
Thanks,
SS -
Tax condition(JVAT) of ship to party is not triggering in Sales order
Hi,
Tax condition(JVAT) of ship to party is not triggering in sales order...
Scenario:
Tax condition types:
JCST- CST Payable
JVAT- VAT Payable GJ
Customer Tax classification for JVAT in OVK3:
1- VAT 4%
A- VAT 0%
B- VAT 2%
Material Tax classification for JVAT in OVK4:
0-Tax Exempt
1-Full Tax
In CMR for
Sold to Party:1001(Mumbai), In Sales Area Data(Billing Tab),we have
Country/Name/Tax category/Name/Tax Class./Descrption
IN / INDIA / JCST / CST Payable / 1 / CST 3%
IN / INDIA / JVAT / VAT Pay GJ / 1 / VAT 4%
In CMR for
Ship to Party:2001(Gujarat),In Sales Area Data(Billing Tab),we have
Country/Name/Tax category/Name/Tax Class./Descrption
IN / INDIA / JCST / CST Payable / 1 / CST 3%
IN / INDIA / JVAT / VAT Pay GJ / A / VAT 0%
Access Seq: JLST
Condition table : 368(Country/Region of Del Plant/Region/Tax class1-Cust/Tax Class1-Mat)
Condition record maintained for JVAT as IN/GJ/GJ/1/1 as 4%
Condition record maintained for JVAT as IN/GJ/GJ/A/1 as 0%
Now the sale(Shipping to) is happening in Gujarat..
In sales order
I entered SP:1001 and SH: 2001
When i check the pricing in sales order,condition type JVAT is triggering 4% which is not true as it as to pick 0%
Kindly guide me where i went wrong...
Regards
Azeez.MohdHi Friends.
I found the solution...
Its customization mistake..
Solution:
When we have 'n' tax categories then we should have 'n' condition tables..
I have 2 tax categories: JCST and JVAT but i have only one condition table 368 which is wrong.. i should have 2 condition tables.. so i created another con. table 468 and assigned to access aeq JLST.
then when i create cond. record , we have to select the appropriate table then it will fetch accordingly.. in sales order..
with regards -
MWST condition type based on Sold-To-Party country
Hello,
I need MWST condition type to be determined with Country,Sold-To-Party country,Tax Classification1 from Customer master and Tax classification from Material master. But in condition table I could not find filed for Sold-to-party Country.
Also as per standard SAP tax gets determined on ship-to-party country, which we want on sold-to-party country.
Regards,
SureshHello
You can find solution to your requirement through program MV45AFZZ with routine USEREXIT_PRICING_PREPARE_TKOMK
Refer SAP Note 21734 - Determining sales tax (VAT) from any partner for complete solution.
Thanks & Regards
JP -
Shipping Condition Type by Volume
Hi all
for business requirement I have defined 2 new condition types in LE-Transportation shipment costspricingpricing control--define condition types: 1 Following is config setting for condition type by Volume wise : Cond. class: B Prices Calculat.type: F Volume Cond.category: B Delivery cos. 2. condition as by weight wise : settings are Cond. class: B Prices Calculat.type: D Gross weight Cond.category: B Delivery cos. My question is when I put condition type as weight type ins shipment cost cost is calculates as per material gross weight maintained in master data, but where as when I am using condition type volume wise in shipment cost. system is calculating cost by gross weight weight and not by volume.altough master data is present in M3. condition base value is also check and that is also correct. but system is not calculation cost as per calculation type wise. Please let me know what is going wrong in system.
Reagrds
SMHi,
Calculation base, determines the origin of the data which is used during pricing, which influence the condition type. In another word, it is used as a basis of determining the available data for price calculation.
As you are already aware, there are few calculation bases available in SAP. Below is a simple example which you can consider while determining which calculation base is suitable for your condition type:
a) If for example in a particular shipment, if only the Leg and/or weight information is relevant for your shipment cost calculation, then you can consider using Shipment Cost Item calculation base. Reason being, all other information such as handling unit, materials etc are not relevant for the calculation.
b) If you have an agreement with your freight forwarder that the cost calculation is based on the handling unit, then depending on the details that you need to track the cost (I.e. by handling unit type, per handling unit or even up to the level that you need to track the content of each handling unit), then you can consider using calculation bases Handling Units C, E or F (whichever fits your requirement).
c) If in a shipment, for example the cost calculation cost differs according to ship-to party, then you can consider using Delivery calculation base. Different sub-items will be determined for each deliveries assigned in the shipment.
d) If for example you need to determine or calculate your shipment cost base on the types of materials, freight types, divisions, other materials information, then you can consider using the Delivery Item calculation base for this. Sub-items per delivery items will be generated.
Hope the above clarifies your doubt.
Thanks. -
Exit for changing Pricing Conditions with change in Ship to party
Hi All,
In transaction VA01/ VA02 the pricing conditions are getting calculated with respect to the Sold-to-party no.. Instead I wanted it to get calculated with respect to the Ship-to-party. Please guide me with an Exit that i can use, or any other way of solving this.
Thanks in Advance.Hi Roberto,
I am creating a sales order with transaction VA01 using a Sold-to-party say 1 and a Ship-to-party 2. While saving the order the tax calculations (if it is interstate - cst and intrastate - vat) are happening with respect to the Sold-to-party.
But I want it to happen with respect to the Ship-to-party. Is there anyway of changing this tax calculations in the pricing condition to take place with respect to my Ship-to-party. -
VPRS condition type in Third party sales
Hi
We have the following scenario for 3rd party sales:
1. SO is created which generates a PR
2. PO is created. Example below
Base price - 100
Freight - 10
Insurance - 10
3. GR is done with below a/c entry
COGS Dr 120
Clearing Cr 120
4. IR is done (Regular a/c entry)
4. Billing - At the time of billing, i expect that system should pass 120 to VPRS value field in COPA (100+10+10 from PO), however, it is only passing 100 (Base price from PO). Any adivse how to fix this
Thanks in advance
ShivHi,
Also, go through the below customized settings for cost + other value to be updated in the VPRs
condition type.
In Pricing, you may want to compare the prices with costs or even implement contribution margin accounting.
To do this, you can use the condition type VPRS as the cost price.
The condition type VPRS goes into the valuation segment in the material master and determines from this the standard price or average price.
Settings in Customizing
The condition type VPRS is labeled as a statistical condition in the pricing procedure.
Using the condition category G, the condition type VPRS goes into the valuation segment of the material master and determines from here the standard or average price.
The condition category S always accesses the standard price whereas condition category T always accesses the average price.
The profit margin is determined using the calculation formula 11 assigned in the pricing procedure. In this calculation formula the cost price is subtracted from the subtotal of net value 2.
Regards
Srinivas Salpala -
How can i get different Condition Type for third-party Purchase Order?
Hi, experts,
for standard PO my Schema works well. now I want to get a different condition type for third-party purchase order. I try to extend field catalog (Pricing Purchasing). The Field PSTYP exists already. However, it is not provided in the field catalog.
How could i do?
Thanks
ReneHi Rene,
If you are seeing fields in the field catalog but are not seeing this field when creating the condition table then the field probably does not exist in the KOMG structure for allowed fields for condition structures. KOMG represents the total of KOMK and KOMP which are the pricing communication structures. If your field is not there then you need to append it to item data in INCLUDE KOMPAZ in KOMP since this is an item level field. If it were a header level field you would append it to include KOMKAZ in KOMK. The inclusion of new fields in KOMK or KOMP automatically means that they are also included in KOMG.
After doing this you will see the field when creating a table. There is further documentation on this process in the IMG under SPRO-> Materials Management-> Purchasing-> Conditions-> Define Price determination Process -> System Enhancements - View the documentation associated to this node in the IMG
Hope this helps,
Matt -
2 condition types inactive -K - Inactive due to calculation basis/shipping
Hi Experts ,
I have 2 condition types inactive with the above message.
The things I have done to fix it..
Created fresh data and tried to run it.
used condition exclusion procedure.
Which worked in a previous scenario though.
Both condition types have similar calculation basis and teh condition records access is same but with different scales.
Awaiting your reponses.
rgds
Vineet_2006vineet,
Reason of K - Inactive due to calculation basis/shipping is set for different reason explained in note 318775.
Check also point 1.2 from note 773034.
Above information will solve the query.
regards, david -
Unable to capture condition type in delivery document
There are deliveries in production server, for the same destination zone, in which, for some deliveries, the condition Z52L is not determined and for some other deliveries, the condition Z52L is determined although the condition record for its plant with its corresponding destination zone is maintained in VK13.
For example, if we take 2 documents with the same Ship-To-Party, same Plant, and same Destination Zone:
1 delivery document, condition Z52L is properly determined while the other
delivery document, condition Z52L is not determined.
Another good representative example if we take 2 delivery documents with the same Ship-To-Party, same Plant and same destination zone:
1 delivery document, condition Z52L is properly determined while the other
delivery document, condition Z52L is not determined.
But in the analysis pricing of the delivery document, there is no destination zone found but still it captures the condition Z52L by just referring to the transportation zone of the ship to party while the other delivery document cannot able to capture it since there is no maintained condition record for those with blank destination zone in VK13.
Another point that we want to clarify is even the user update the pricing in the delivery document, still the condition was not yet updated even it is already maintained in VK13.
Please help and explain this issue to us.
Thank you in advance. Hoping for your assistance on this matter.
Reyna Agustinhi,
for the first errot check if you have maintained the item level copy control (from sales order to del). if yes check the settings against the field 'pos/- qty'. put a + here. for the second issue check in the item level copy ctrl from sales order to billing maintain 'd' in the price type.
saurabh -
Sold to party adress copy to ship to party
HI,
when customers place an order on the internet they get a choice to deliver to a different delivery address.
When customers choose this option and type in a different address it does not ask them to enter in a tel number.
Would it be possible in sap to copy the main tel number entered on the internet into the ship to party tel number on all occasions?
Internet orders have shipping condition E1
Example delivery 807924096 which is an internet order, the sold to party tel number is 07923622906 the ship to party has a different address and no tel number, could the sold to party tel number be copied to ship to party tel number?how
reagrds,
DebeshHi,
You cannot do this directly. But using the user exits you can enable it.
You can also save the telephone number provided by the user in some Z table and then take the values from the Z table and then enter them in the telephone number of the ship to party. May be this can also be scheduled as a job and can run twice a day, by which you can actually optimise the system performance. -
Hello All
I am in the process of configuring the rebate processing in our system...this is my first experience...we are on ECC7.0...I am follwing the Rebate Processing configuration guide but I have a few questions...
My requirement is the following
Order volume fully paid.... the following will apply
<$500,000 credit percentage is 3%
>500,000 and < credit percentage is 3.75
etc....
In the condition type configuration under control data I am confused of the calculation type to use and the condition category as well...I am using condition type Material Rebate, but have also added all the condition types related to Rebate...just in case.
There will be no manual payments or partial settlements. The rebate is due at end of year of all fully paid items.
If there is shipments that are due but will not be during the annual term and it exceeds the lets say 1,000,000 since he credit percentage would be 6% in this case....after the review of the rebate agreement then the discount for the following year will be set at the appropriate percentage and will begin at $1.
For example if the total sales during this term are 1.2 million the the credit percentage for the following year would be 6% for all the sales the following year beginning at $1...sales for the annual term of 1.2 million would equate to a rebate of 72,000 (6%).
Also, all material that is bought the customer receives a 3% discount on top of the above.
Will I need to also include condtion type groups???
Your help is GREATLY appreciated!!!Hi Eric and thanks for your reply ....
If the Rebate is for a certain customer and they are having multiple materials for the rebate and can have channel partners that will also be a ship to party and rebate applies....I am thinking I need to use the 0002 condition type? Please confirm.
That is the one I have chosen so far....I do not see the rebate condtion type being being pulled through the sales order on the condition tab...it wants to keep pulling in the pricing condtion table for that rebate material....any advice as to what I may have missed....I did follow the config guide...as stated before this is my first experience wit hrebates...
I can understand the invoice showing the accruals but how would I do the scale to know if the customer reaches a certain amount their rebate percentages would be different based on the paid invoice sales...
up to 500,000 paid would be A 3 percent discount
Over 500,000 would be a 3.75 percent discount
This is also on top of the standard 3 percent discount they are given on the material as a customer discount.
Please advise....your assistance is appreciated -
Re: Pricing for more than one ship-to-party in sales order
Hi Gurus,
Currently I am facing a problem regarding pricing the shipping charge for a sales order having more than one ship-to parties in it.
Our business process is having a pricing condition type which calculates the shipping charge based on the total value of the order.
The technical details of the condition type are as follows:
ZSHH
Cond. class = A Discount or surcharge Plus/minus = A Positive
Calculat.type = B Fixed amount
"Group cond" & "RoundDiffComp" are "checked"
GrpCond.routine 1 Overall Document
Scale basis = value
Now due to this depending on the entire order value the shipping cost is calculated.
However when there are 2 ship-to-party the system should group the items to be shipped to each ship-2-party and calculate the prices accordingly.
Now as the "GrpCond.routine 1 Overall Document" -- it is taking the total order value while calculating the shipping price even if there are 2 ship2party in the sales order. I am just wondering how to go about this situation.
There is no value in the pricing formula that calculates the price based on ship-2-party.
Can anyone help me with this?
Does this mean that I have to create a new scale formula in VOFM?
Also how is the shipping price charged when the customer requests partial deliveries?
Thanks in advance
VinitVinit,
You need to create a new GrpCond.routine. You can do this in VOFM-> Formulas -> Structure of group key. You will need to have the carrier available in the communication structure komp. So assuming you do this, create a formula like 050(RV65A050). Enter code that would look like(I am assuming your carrier code is 10 in length):
FORM FRM_GRUPPENKEY_050.
xvakey = '050'.
Xvakey+3(10) = komp-carrier.
ENDFORM.
Then assign 50 to the condition type(v/06) as the new GrpCond routine. This should give you your desired results.
Partial deliveries will only take the portion of delivery charges shipped from the line. Eg if 10$ freight on the line and 1 of 2 is shipped, you will only see 5$ on that invoice as long as your pricing rule is copy unchanged.
Edited by: Matthew Menzies on Jan 21, 2009 11:26 PM -
User exit/BADI for condition type in shipment costing
Hi! Does anyone know of any user exit or BADI or function module we can use to populate a value to a custom condition type we have created for shipment costing? We want to calculate the customs duty charges based on the purchase price of the item in the PO. As such, we need to go extract this information on the PO and populate it on the condition type.
Appreciate any help on this.
Cheers!
SFDear SF,
These are the Exits available in the shipment cost process.Take help of ABAPer to choose the appropriate one.
V54B0001 Shipment costing: Configure pricing
V54B0003 Shipment Costs Calculation: Determine Rate Type and Cur
V54B0004 Shipment Cost Calculation: Determine Status
V54C0001 Shipment costing: Description(s) shipement cost item(s)
V54C0002 Shipment costing: Create shipment cost sub-items
V54C0003 Shipment Costs Processing: Determine Invoicing Party
V54C0004 Shipment Costs Processing: Determine Loc. for Tax Invoi
V54D0001 Shipment Costing: Determining the Tax Countries
V54KSFRC Determining the factors for apportionment of shipment c
V54P0001 Extended Function Codes for Shipment Cost Information
V54U0001 Shipment cost processing: Check whether changes made
V54U0002 Check shipment costs for completion
V54U0003 Specification of shipment cost number
V54U0004 Formatting for update of new objects (shipment costs)
V54U0005 Updating new objects in shipment cost processing
V54U0006 Shipment Purchase Order - Header Data Supply
V54U0007 Shipment Purchase Order - Item Data Supply
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Is there a way to use the iMac's display mode with a Mac mini with out logging in first on the Mac mini (late2014) im currently useing my Mac mini as a portable computer, I take it to the university and use the iMacs there as a monitor but before I c
-
Why my whole library wont sync to my phone i have the room
Every time i try to sync my itunes to my iphone it only syncs 330 out of 9 something i have the room for it
-
Just upgraded from a 1998 G3 to a Mac Pro and my WP docs wont open
How can I open my Apple Claris word documents when the Mac Pro doesn't support classic. Thats 10 years work that I cant open. Some doc were created in OS 9 and others in early OS 10.2 Please Help
-
This time I will try to do this right.
I am trying to make make a class Account but I keep on getting an error that says that my if else statements are wrong I am not sure why. So my question is can anyone tell me why I keep getting an error that says 'else' without 'if '? I have tried to
-
Apple Mail: unread messages appear in bold even if unread. How to fix?
In iOS 10.9 and Mail 7.0/Classic View my inbox messages change from bold to normal before I've actually read them. For example, I delete an incoming unwanted (bold) spam message, then the marker jumps down to the next message and this changes from bo