Shipment cost for multiple condition type is not working

Dear Experts
I am doing inbound transportation,I have a freight condition, FRB1, and two fixed cost condition type ( ZX01 and ZX02).
I maintained 3 condition type under T_06, and created condition record.
Now when I am doing shipment costing system is taking the last assigned condition type relevant condition record value, however it is pulling the other two condition type in the pricing procedure and with information message.
Could some body suggest how to bring all 3 condition type value effective for shipment cost.
Thanks & Regards
Sudhansu

Hi Durga,
Most importantly whenever we create a condition type with statistical check box it means that value will not be included in Net price calculation this is the only purpose of statistical check box.(Like any freight charges it will go to your stock a/c even though statistical check box is there in your Pricing procedure)
When you create condition type for any charges with Cond.category B Delivery costs and Accrual check box in M/06 by default it will go to stock account, but you can restrict that by using a functionality
Check this link for complete process
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPLO/PostingplanneddeliverycosttoNon-inventoryaccount

Similar Messages

Calculation formula userexit not working for multiple condition types

Hi,
we have a problem in the CRM ISA-B2B scenario where the custom user exit is only working for single condition type.
but we need it for multiple condition types .
the value of the subtotal is not being retrieved for multiple conditions. at a time only one condition value is being retrieved and shown in the webshop - shopping basket.
for ex:
we have scenario 1 where Y001 -Freight condition type is applicable for one customer.and Y002 is applicable for another customer.
when we are trying to show the subtotal condition value in the webshop by using a single custom user exit in the pricing procedure it is only working for either of the above 2 customers depending on the VMC cache status.
is there any problem if use the single user exit for both condition types?
and if it needs to be differentiated how exactly we can do that with the same logic in the java class.
Thanks in advance,
PSR.

Hi Arshi,
below is the code:
public class ZValFormula_ZZWI1 extends ValueFormulaAdapter {
     private static String zzwi = "ZZWI1";
     private static char zzwiC = '@';
     private static UserexitLogger userexitlogger = new UserexitLogger(
     ZValFormula_ZZWI1.class);
     public BigDecimal overwriteConditionValue(IPricingItemUserExit item,
               IPricingConditionUserExit condition) {
          ICurrencyValue val = condition.getConditionValue();
          userexitlogger.writeLogDebug( "value saved for " + zzwi + " (" + zzwiC + ") = "
                    + val.getValueAsString());
          item.setSubtotal( zzwiC, val.getValue());
          return val.getValue();
hope this would give more idea to look at the problem.
Thanks,
PSR

Shipment cost transfer to condition types of PO

HI! I saw this note 427944 which states the rules to transferring the shipment costs into the condition types of the PO:
The shipment cost value (without tax amounts) is cumulated for all relevant shipment cost documents for each service agent and transferred to a corresponding condition type of the purchase order item. Before cumulation, the amounts are first converted into the purchase order currency.
1. A transfer of the values for each condition type (similar to the transfer from a shipment cost document to the SD billing document) is not supported.
2. If different service agents exist in the shipment cost documents, a corresponding number of condition lines (with value 0) must be specified in the purchase order item. These can always belong to the same condition type (in schema 'Manual') or also to different condition types (not 'Manual'):
a) Manual condition lines: If the condition type in the schema of the purchase order is marked is 'manual', the condition type must be created (with value 0) in the purchase order item before the goods
receipt. If delivery costs are expected from different service agents, several non-valuated entries must be generated for this condition type. If more condition lines exist than required, these are then no longer taken into account. If condition lines are missing, the last service agents are not settled.
- Advantage: You only have to define one condition type for the delivery costs.
- Disadvantage: Each purchase order must be processed manually before the goods receipt.
b) Automatic condition lines: If the condition lines are to be generated automatically for the delivery costs (the condition type is not flagged as 'Manual' in the schema), the schema must have
enough condition types to settle several service agents. If more condition lines exist than required, these are then no longer taken into account. If condition lines are missing, the last service
agents are not settled.
- Advantage: The goods receipt can be carried out without manual preparation beforehand in the purchase order.
- Disadvantage: You must define identical condition types with different names.
I can understand point a about the manual condition lines and have tried it out myself.
But I don't quite understand point b about the automatic condition lines and so I need some clarification here.
1. Does that mean I do not need to maintain the condition type in the PO?
2. Does that mean the system will automatically find a condition to put the shipment cost for each service agent?
3. How does the system know which condition to take then?
4. I tested with the 'manual' field not flagged in the PO schema but no shipment cost is transferred. Is it because of the existence of other normal condition types that are also not manual?
Appreciate any help to this.
Thanks!
SF

No answer

Stastical Condition Type is not working in Purchase Order

Hi All,
I created a pricing procedure and Bank charges are created as a condition type which is stastical. I assigned a account Key and Accural key for the same condition type. We activated Purchase Account Management
Purchase order is raised with USD 100, ank charges(%) which will be calculated on Base price, for example Bank charges is 1% then bank charges will be USD1.
I want these bank charges should not be added to the material cost. But when we are doing GR accounting entries as below.
Stock account 101     +
GR/IR     100     -
Pur acc     100     +
Pur Offset     101     -
Bank chargesAccount key     10 +
Accural     10     -
In the above Bank Charges are added to Stock account which is not required.
Even though I created the Bank charges Condition type as Statical still the value is adding to the stock account.
Thanks and Regards
durga

Hi Durga,
Most importantly whenever we create a condition type with statistical check box it means that value will not be included in Net price calculation this is the only purpose of statistical check box.(Like any freight charges it will go to your stock a/c even though statistical check box is there in your Pricing procedure)
When you create condition type for any charges with Cond.category B Delivery costs and Accrual check box in M/06 by default it will go to stock account, but you can restrict that by using a functionality
Check this link for complete process
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPLO/PostingplanneddeliverycosttoNon-inventoryaccount

Editing info for multiple files in Itunes, not working

Ok, first off, I'm a BRAND NEW Mac user and having a few problems crossing over. Here's the deal...
I've got an external hard drive with about 200 Gigs of music all in separate folders. I'm loading all my songs into Itunes, but keeping them copied only to my external drive...no problem.
However, some of the songs in Itunes are showing up with no artist and/or album names because this info is not in the ID3 tags (im assuming) of the mp3s.
When I goto "get info" and try to manually type in the artist name/album name and click "ok"...NOTHING CHANGES. They still show up in the list blank. Why aren't my edits to the files changing? How can I fix this?
Thanks in advance for all your help everyone!

Does it matter that this drive used to be used only on my windows machine?
Yes it does.
Post over here and ask about it -> http://discussions.apple.com/forum.jspa?forumID=1225
See if it is formatted FAT32 or NTFS and include that info.

Assign cost object by condition type for accounting

Hello All,
Our scenario is that we have a single billing line with a service order assigned as the cost object on the line item. This line has multiple condition types going to different GL accounts on the RV document.
Once the service order is on the billing line all of the RV document lines get the same service order for cost object assignment We want to assign different cost objects (service order, internal order) to the different lines on the RV document based on the GL account.
Example:
Billing document line 10
Material 123456
Service order 999999
Condition type           GL                      Desired Cost Object
ZZ01                      480000                  999999 - service order
ZZ03                      560000                  11111 - internal order
ZZ04                      470000                  999999 - service order
ZZ05                      440000                   22222 - internal order
We have the multiple GLs getting assigned, it is just the cost object on the RV document that is a problem. Is there a way to do this in config...or is a user exit the only option?
Thanks in advance!
Edited by: Allison Sains on Jan 20, 2012 7:01 PM

Thanks for the response. It looks like we're going to try and rework the account assignment so a user exit is not required (use OKB9 instead).

ZPRS- Cost(data source H) condition type is not visible in CRM sales order

Hi Colleagues,
I created a sales order in ERP. In the sales order the condition type ZPRS- Cost(data source H) is available. I downloaded the this sales order to CRM i can able to see the ZPRS condition type in sales order.
But when i create a new sales order with the same data (BP, Material,Sales organization) the condition ZPRS is not visible in the sales order. When i checked the PRC_TRACE it is showing the error as "Condition with external datasource has not be found".
Can any body help me in this issue.
Tanks and Best Regards,
Rajeswari

Hi Michael ,
Thank you very much for your answer. I just require one more confirmation from you.
Could you please confirm If we post a returns document in CRM system directly the "ZPRS or VPRS - Cost" Condition type will not appear in the return document condition types.
Untill and unless it is a billing document in CRM system the "cost" condtion wont appear rt?
Could you please confirm it.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Best Regards,
Rajeswari

Tax not calculated in MIRO for the condition type JVCD

Hi,
We made some new different tax code and attached with JVCD , its calculating in PO but in MIRO calculation part not done but for other condition type ,JVRD,JVRN system calculating well...
Please tell me some way why not system calculating in case of JVCD and JVCN for capital case..
Thanks in Advance,
Dharmveer

Hi,
We totally agreed with you and already we checked our configuration part is OK.Actually we want to map some process where we captured excise in GR but no need to take credit i.e. to post the excise in J1IEX,so we do not have to post our cenvat/modvat entry in MIRO but we need to calculate VAT whether it is deductible or non deductible.So far this thing is concerned,we made separate tax code which we use at time of MIRO posting and in configuration we did not attached the tax code in logitics-basic excise -assign to company code. Because once we attached here , system asking to make to pass furst RG part2 entry then it allows to post MIRO entry which we do not want .So please understand this scenario is different and we got the success for JVRN/JVRD for VAT but getting issue in case of capital VAT where system does not calculate tax for JVCN/JVCD .....where we want to process MIRO without posting J1IEX..
Please thing and analyse ..give some helping response..
Thanks,
Dharmveer

Tax value is not picked up correctly for the condition type in SO creation

Hi All,
I have a issue in Picking up Tax value correctly for the condition type in SO Creation.
Actual Issue:
When creating the sales order manually,
tax value is picked up correctly for one condition type: ISS3.
When the Sales Order is created via Idoc using the function module 'idoc_input_orders', tax value is not picked for same condition type: ISS3.
We need to find out why the value for the condition type 'ISS3' is not picked in this way!
Can anybody solve this issue!
What can be the reason which is stopping picking up tax value for condition type: ISS3 when Sales Order is created via F.M 'IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS'! While it picked up the same while creating Sales Order manuallly.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Deep.

Hi All,
Can anybody give the solution for above posted issue!
Working:
When creating the sales order manually,
tax value is picked up correctly for the condition type ISS3.
Actual Issue:
When the Order is created via Idoc using the function module 'idoc_input_orders',
tax value is not picked .
I need to find out why the value for the condition type 'ISS3' is not picked.
I have debugged the issue from WE19 but upto Conditions tab it is picking up tax value but then it is becoming zero again it remains zero after saving SO.
But Manually tax value is picked up for condition type ISS3 and remains same after saving order.
I have debugged it several times fro WE19 but not able to find route cause for the issue.
What can be the issue over here!
Can anybody give me solution for the same!
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Deep.

Expense condition type does not transfer to CO-PA

Dear guru,
My client would like to post expense (ex. promotion expense) via sales order, then SD consultant create condition type and assign expense G/L to this condition type and I assign this condition type to value field via tcode KE4I. When we create sales order and use this condition type, value of this condition type is not transfered to the value field. I set cost element with category '1'. I know standard is not support for this situation. Please kindly to suggest me for solve the problem 'How do expense value of condition type from sales order will be transfered to CO-PA', example user exit or others.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Nattakarn.

Hi
Changing the cost element category to 12 can be done only at the begining of the fiscal year as follows
But if promotional expenses is already created as a cost element with say category 1, now if you want too change it you might get an error KS134 Field change CElem Category is not possible (transaction data already exists)
Hence use TCode KA02, Edit->Analysis Period, Click other analysis period provide from begining of fiscal year to 12/31/9999.
You might have to create a new GL Account cost element if you want to go ahead with the changes in middle of the fiscal year
Regards,
Suraj

Error while posting in accounts: Condition type does not exist in COPA

Hi,
I'm trying to post an invoice into accounts but I'm constantly encountering a Error message as : Assign condition type in COPA.
This error is appearing whenever I'm assigning the pricing procedure and KOFK account entries to a new sales organization.
The error does not appear for my previous Sales org. Also I check with the COPA settings, it does not allow us to enter the condition type mentioned in the error.
Could anyone suggest a solution
Regards
Rasheed

Dear Customer,
To solve error KE391, the corresponding value field assignment
must be done in transaction KE4IM.
Currently, the value field assignment is available for this
condition type in transaction KE4I (SD conditions assignment).
In this case you have to maintain the assignment to a value field in
transaction KE4IM. After including the corresponding assignment in
KE4IM, the error KE391 should not come anymore.
Please, check this.
I hope that the information are helpful.
With best regards
Claudia Neudeck

In sales order for the condition type MWST, **Tax code** is displaying wron

Hi
In sales order for the condition type MWST, *Tax code* is displaying wrongly at header level i.e. FF instead of AO (under account determination tab)
AO tax is 0% but for FF it is 19%
I have checked with the Access sequence it is picking access 08 correctly according to this it should show AO in tax code field for MWST but it is not so..
There is a manual change for tax classification for material master in va02 initially it was blank now it is changed to ' 0 ' is any way influencing....?
Even if I consider material tax classification and customer tax code should not be FF because tax code FF is not maintained for the combination of access sequences for condition type MWST
Please help me.
Rajendra Prasad

Dear Rajendra,
There is a manual change for tax classification for material master in va02 initially it was blank now it is changed to ' 0 ' is any way influencing....?
Definitely material Tax classification will influence to determine the Tax code.
-->So Make sure that customer and material master having proper tax classification indicator.
-->Have you Update the price after changing the tax classification in the sales order.by going to item dat -->condition tab then click on Update push button bottom of the conditions screen.
-->Once again the check the condition record maintanence also for your MWST access sequence.
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Function Module for getting the Sales Price for a condition type

Hi,
I am looking for a standard function module to which I can pass my condition type(new customizing) and it will return the sales price. The customer is going to create some new condition type to manitain the sales price. I'll have the necessary information like material/sales org/distribution channel, customer and need the standard function module to read the condition records for that condition type(as configured) and give me the price. PLease help if you know of a standard function module performing this.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Malthi

Hi malthi ,
welcome to sdn
for material sales area u can look for the validations is table MVKE.
the classification of the conditions is in tables like A901, a902 etc which in my opinion holds the condition types per classification .
put a A* in se11 and this will give the list of tables per classification .
u need to get the conditions as per kschl and dmbtr and
etc..
like this ..
Get Condition Values for Material/Plant combination
IF NOT i_a916[] IS INITIAL.
    SELECT knumh kappl kschl krech
           kbetr konwa kpein kmein
           INTO TABLE i_konp
           FROM konp
           FOR ALL ENTRIES IN i_a916
           WHERE knumh EQ i_a916-knumh AND
                 kappl EQ i_a916-kappl AND
                 kschl EQ i_a916-kschl AND
                 loevm_ko NE 'X'.
ENDIF.
Get Condition Values for Material/Plant/Ordertype/
Customer combination
IF NOT i_a925[] IS INITIAL.
    SELECT knumh kappl kschl krech
           kbetr konwa kpein kmein
           APPENDING TABLE i_konp
           FROM konp
           FOR ALL ENTRIES IN i_a925
           WHERE knumh EQ i_a925-knumh AND
                 kappl EQ i_a925-kappl AND
                 kschl EQ i_a925-kschl AND
                 loevm_ko NE 'X'.
ENDIF.
just check this Fm if u can apply ur condition over here ..
ME_GET_PRICE_CONDITION
regards,
VIjay.

Error Message : Condition type is not maintained in the schema RM0002

HI Gurus,
I have created a new purchasing procedure as follows.
ZVATV : Condition Schema
VATV : Condition Type
VA : Sch.Grp Vndr
When I create the Purchase order, the above mentioned schema, ZVATV is automatically determined.
But when I create Contract, system throws an error message saying condition type VATV is not maintained in the schema RM0002.
I am very new to SAP, Kindly explain in very detail about this error message and ways to get rid of it.
If u have got any very detailed material about pricing kindly forward it to my mail id: [email protected]
Thanks in advance.
~Gokul.

Hi,
The new condition type you are specifing is the gross price condition (PB00). for PB00 condition type a supplementary pricing procedure is assigned as RM0002. u may have copied the PB00 and changed it to VATV, but with out changing the RM0002. copy the RM0002 and in that also change the PB00 to VATV. after this go to VATV condition type control data (M/06) and assign the new supplementary pricing procedure instead of RM0002.
The supplementary pricing procedure is required to have the condition types for which no access seqeunce is mentioned. All the condition types in main pricing procedure with out access sequence needs to be mentioned in supplementary pricing procedure.therefore all these condition types will have the same validity periods as PB00.
Regards,
Ramakrishna

Condition Records For Tax Condition types for SAP 4.7

Dear Experts,
What is the procedure to maintain condition records for tax condition types like CST , VAT and Service Tax. We are not using CIN. In MM01 and XD02 tax classifications i have maintained UTXJ condition Type and also maintained the above mention tax condition types.. But when i create condition records for UTXJ in VK11 the sysytem is asking for Tax code. In FTXP when i defined Tax code A1 for Tax ProcedureTAXIN1 where i maintained all the Tax condition types there.But i am unable to save the Tax % in FTXP.When i try to save the tax code it is not saving.
Is there any other procedure to maintain Tax condition types for SAP4.7.
My Pricing procedure that i maintained in V/08 is Z00001.
Regards
Jyoti

Hi Jyoti
Since you are not using CIN, you can do the follwing for tax conditions
Check the assignment of the TAx procedure to country
once u do this , you will be able to maintin the vendor and customer records for MWST type for taxes
then create condition records for MWSt with access sequence MWST in condiution type or design one suited to your needs
alternatevely in the current procedure you can change access sequence for condition type UTXJ form the current one to MWST and then maintain condition records
hope this helps
thanks
Akasha

Shipment cost for multiple condition type is not working

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for