ZPRS- Cost(data source H) condition type is not visible in CRM sales order

Hi Colleagues,
I created a sales order in ERP. In the sales order the condition type ZPRS- Cost(data source H) is available. I downloaded the this sales order to CRM i can able to see the ZPRS condition type in sales order.
But when i create a new sales order with the same data (BP, Material,Sales organization) the condition ZPRS is not visible in the sales order. When i checked the PRC_TRACE it is showing the error as "Condition with external datasource has not be found".
Can any body help me in this issue.
Tanks and Best Regards,
Rajeswari

Hi Michael ,
Thank you very much for your answer. I just require one more confirmation from you.
Could you please confirm If we post a returns document in CRM system directly the "ZPRS or VPRS - Cost" Condition type will not appear in the return document condition types.
Untill and unless it is a billing document in CRM system the "cost" condtion wont appear rt?
Could you please confirm it.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Best Regards,
Rajeswari

Similar Messages

Shipping conditions in Contracts not copied over to sales order w/ref

In standard SAP the shipping conditions are pulled in from the Sold-to party's customer master unless the shipping conditions are hard coded in the sales order type, in which case they overrule the shipping conditions of the sold-to.
A client enters contracts (CQ) with their customers and creates sales orders with reference to these contracts. The shipping conditions within these contracts are different from those on the Sold-to master record. The client wants the shipping conditions from the contract to flow through to the sales orders created with reference to the contract (instead of the system currently getting them from the sold-to). I do not believe this is standard functionality but I want to be absolutely sure before I respond to the client and tell them that we will have to create a custom routine in copy control to achieve this from the contract.
Other than tweaking copy control routines is there any way the system can be configured so that the shipping conditions from the Contract (CQ) header get pulled in when a sales order is created with reference to the CQ contract?
Any help/suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
SJ

Hi,
Whatever be the shipping conditions in contracts that can be flow to sales order,
Please check your input, if you mentioned in sales document then remove from there - VOV8
Also check in copy controll - VTAA
CQ to OR at header level
Copy requirement - 001
Tickmark to complete refrance
Kapil

ERP Sales Orders Types are not visible in CRM WebUI ! ! ! !

Hi All
I am working on CRM 7.0 IDES, I am trying to create an ERP sales order but when I chose create ERP sales order a popup menu with no document types so I am not able to chose the Sales order document type, the CRM and ERP are integrated and the ERP sales Profile is maintained and assigned is there more settings should be done to make them visible?
Regards
Jacopo Francoise

Hi Jacopo Francoise,
Check for the customization in Tr. SPRO path IMG-> CRM->Transactions->Settings for ERP Transactions maintained via CRM.
You should define the ERP sales order profile with your ECC system RFC details. Also read the documents available there.
Hope this will help.
Thanks,
Vikash.

Cost center assignment to condition types

Hi All,
Is there a possibility to assign a cost center directly to a condition type in PO.
I have created 3 new condition types to which 3 different P&L acounts have been assigned in OBYC. Then in OKB9 cost centers have been assigned to these G/L accounts.
The client wants to know if it is possible to assign cost centers directly to condition types rather than going through G/L accounts?
Regards,
V S

Hi,
Whatu2019s your real requirement! Condition type is pricing element which is in pricing master and Cost center or G/L account are master data in FI and linking both directly not possible, but you can link through other parameters.
When you are creating Purchase Order with account assignment K, you need to enter cost center name and must need to enter G/L account. If a cost center has multiple cost elements, as you needed, you can enter G/L account respectively with each line item of PO individually with cost center.
OR
You can set default G/L account in purchase order without material master, check the link:
http://www.bluemarlinsys.com/ns/0603-03.asp
Regards,
Biju K

How the freight cost are transferred from condition type of shipment cost document to service entry sheet and collected in service PO item

Dear Experts:
could you please share with me the knowledge for below topic:
How the freight cost are transferred from condition type of shipment cost document to service entry sheet and collected in service PO item, because these three objects use three different pricing procedures, and different condition type.
how did the condition type of service entry sheet know to copy the value of whcih condition type in the pricing procedure of shipment cost document?
Is this SAP standard function OR there need an enhancement to do that?
I didn’t find related condition value copy setting in background, could you please share related setting with me? Thank you very much for your kind help!
Best regards,
Andy

Hi, Gopi,
Glad to see your feedback, but i still have question on your feedback:
which condition type in the pricing procedure of service entry sheet should know to capture the net value of shipment cost doc? becasue there are so many condition types,
And i have checked the corresponding condition type (PRSX) of service entry sheet pricing procedure in my SAP system, this is a self-defined condition type, but NO any calculation routine maintained for the condition type (PRSX), how did the condition type (PRSX) know to copy the total cost of shipment cost document?
Below is the example and another question:
what the relationship between the pricing procedures at service PO item level and service line item level?
1. The freight cost in shipment cost document—including used condition type and pricing procedure
The pricing procedure of shipment cost document
2. The freight cost in service entry sheet—including used condition type and pricing procedure
The pricing procedure of service entry sheet--the pricing procedure at service line item level
3. The freight cost in service PO item—including used condition type and pricing procedure:

Expense condition type does not transfer to CO-PA

Dear guru,
My client would like to post expense (ex. promotion expense) via sales order, then SD consultant create condition type and assign expense G/L to this condition type and I assign this condition type to value field via tcode KE4I. When we create sales order and use this condition type, value of this condition type is not transfered to the value field. I set cost element with category '1'. I know standard is not support for this situation. Please kindly to suggest me for solve the problem 'How do expense value of condition type from sales order will be transfered to CO-PA', example user exit or others.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Nattakarn.

Hi
Changing the cost element category to 12 can be done only at the begining of the fiscal year as follows
But if promotional expenses is already created as a cost element with say category 1, now if you want too change it you might get an error KS134 Field change CElem Category is not possible (transaction data already exists)
Hence use TCode KA02, Edit->Analysis Period, Click other analysis period provide from begining of fiscal year to 12/31/9999.
You might have to create a new GL Account cost element if you want to go ahead with the changes in middle of the fiscal year
Regards,
Suraj

Condition type is not get in the PO output

Hi,
I have defined a new condition type ZRA0- Discount as discount charges .
The condition type is not getting print out in PO copy.
The vendor wants to see in the PO copy.
Pls suggest how to configure
Regards
Sp

Hi,
If i understood your problem, you would like to print the discount in PO print copy along with price.ok.
then check with your Abaper,he can fetch the Discount value for that perticular condition type(ZRA0) & print in the PO copy.Its depends on the print programme to get the data from the document to the print out.
Regds

Condition type not flown(not determined) into the sales order

Hello Experts,
There is one discount condition type which is having proper condition records, validity date.However, it is not getting determined properly and is not flown into the sales order. the user wants to know why this may happen.I tried to reason it may be the sales order date and the conditon record date may be different or the condition record is changed after the creation of the sales order.neither of the reasons seem to hold good. any ideas?
Regards,
Raj

Hello,
I have looked into the analysis and asked him to update the condition by clicking on that.also, I found that the condition record is having a proper valid date. now the user would update only after knowing the exact reason why it did not flow into the sales order,he knows he has to update the condition but would not do so till he knows the right reason why condition is not determined in the sales order. now this is the situation.
the probable reasons as per analysis of the conditon type are as follows(for your information). can it be one ofThere are different reasons for this:
1)The condition was deleted manually in the item condition screen.
2)The condition record was created later. Please note that order processing and pricing have buffer mechanisms. This means that a newly added condition record might only be found after order processing has been left completely and then started again. them?
Regards,
Raj.

Additional VAT condition type is not flowing to PO

Dear All,
            An additional tax of 1 % is levied in State of gujurat and for this we can take the credit . It behaves exactly like VAT like it calculates its value as 1% of base amount and excise duty levied on it . But this condition is not available in standard TAXINN procedure . So we created a new procedure copying from TAXINN .We created a condition type copying from standard condition type JVRD that is for VAT on which we take credit .Then we assign this condition type to tax procedure immediately below condition type JVRD and it should calculate the value in the same way as that of VAT .Then we assigned this procedure to India , assigned all the condition types in CIN config and maintained default condition types for this procedure copying from TAXINN .
            But while we are creating a PO after that ,this additional tax condition type is not flowing in it .
Can anybody let me know where is the missing link in this customisation .
Regards
Abhijit Das

Hi AP ,
         The condition type is Valid from : Todays Date and valid to 31.12.9999 . Is there any problem with this ?
Abhijit

Manual Condition Type should be visible in Sales order by default

Hi
How to maintain manual condition types in Sales orders by default. They will be maintaining the value based on the discussion they had with the customer(Negotiated price). The condition type should be visible in the procedure and they will only enter the value.(The method of keying condition type manually is not accepted by the client).
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Vamsi Javaji.

Hi,
In the PRICING PROCEDURE V/08 maintain the CONDITION TYPE as Mandatory
In the CONDITION TYPE V/06 maintain the field MANUAL ENTRIES as C which is Manual entry has a priority.
And check the box VALUE
Now maintain the condition records for the condition type in VK11 with 0 value
Now while processing the sales order the CONDITION TYPE will trigger from the CONDITION RECORDS with 0 value and this can be in EDITABLE mode ( and maintain the value)because of the check box VALUE you flagged in V/06.
Please try this and revert back if you need further details
thanks,
santosh

Condition Types appearing two times in a Purchase Order

Hi,
The condition types are same in supplementary schema (for Info Record) and Purchase Order Calculation Schema. When I put some value against a condition type under conditions in Info Record then that condition type appears 2 times in the purchase order. It seems the condition type appears 1st time (with value from Info Record) because it is picked from Info Record and 2nd time (with no value) from the Purchase Order Calculation Schema.
The requirement is condition type should appear only single time in PO (by default) with or without value in spite of having info record. In case some value is maintained in Info Record then the condition type should appear with value but in a single line in PO which can be edited if required. There should not be second line of same condition type by default in PO.
Can anyone provide some idea to resolve this?
Thanks in advance

There is only 1 condition line (apart from PB00), which comes 2 times in PO by default, in MEK2 and also one condition line (one line was deleted and then saved) in last PO (from the Info Record). But the condition type still comes 2 times while creating a new PO.
Please provide some more answer to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance

Weblogic Server 10.3.6.0.8 one of data sources failing while other 6 not

Hello,
I have 7 data sources connecting to the same database schema. After I upgraded the environment (production) day before yesterday evening I noticed one of the data sources start failing with exception below:
"Connection test failed with the following exception: weblogic.common.resourcepool.ResourceUnavailableException: No resources currently available in pool ePayBatchDS to allocate to applications.
Either specify a time period to wait for resources to become available, or increase the size of the pool and retry.."
The data source capacity size is Min:1 Max:30, I increased to be as 1-50, after change it is worked for 15 minutes then it back again giving the same error message above. Please not that I have in production two servers as high availability approach however I upgraded one of them till now only and the same data source in the old server not failing.
Please advise.
Old Environment Specifications:
Weblogic Server version: 10.3.4.0
OS: Sun OS10 SPARC 64-bit
JDK: 1.6.0 update 32 64-bit
New Environment Specifications:
Weblogic Server version: 10.3.6.0.8
OS: Solaris 11.1 (64-Bit Mode) SRU 20 (18 June 2014 patchset).
JDK: 1.7.0 update 55 64-bit
Thanks,
Mohd.

Hii,
No resources currently available in pool ePayBatchDS to allocate to applications.
This exception cleaarly shows the connection are not available to allocate to ePayBatchDS datasource.
As you said there are altogether 7 data source out which six are working and one is not.
In general if you are creating a datasource and providing a connection pool size we should consider the number of connection available or allowed at the database side as well.
Please cross check at the DB side the number of connection available and based on that try to tune the connection pool size in your data sources.
Regards,
Abdul

Condition type is not reflecting in sales orders

hi,
i have created two condition type like jser (service tax) and other one is jste(service tax +cess) but in pricing procedure jfact it is reflecting but while making contract order these two condition type is not accessing.
please help in this connection.

Hi,
After Creating the CONDITION TYPES you need to assign the condition types in the PRICING PROCEDURE
goto the
SPRO->FINANCIALACCOUNTING>FINANCIAL ACCONTING& GLOBAL SETTINGS>TAX ON SALES /PURCHASE>BASIC SETTINGS--->CHECK CALCULATION PROCEDURE.
Here select you procedure and assign the CONDITION TYPE
regards,
santosh

VPRS condition not floating in to sales order...

Good evening every body...
My query is VPRS condition not floating in to sales order...
Please give your valuable inputs
I checked Pricing procedure analysis
giving error requirement 004 not fulfilled
Note:
I checked determine cost in Item category (TAN)
VPRS condition in my pricing procedure
I maintained Standard price in Accounting1 tab of MMR
Valuation class I maintained in MMR
VPRS condition type I maintain condition category-"G"
Anything I missed out???
Regards,
Krishna

In my view, the information provided by you is not sufficient to provide you an exact solution.
As based on & differs business scenario to business scenario you are following.
Like whether it is BOM, MTO/MTS, Free Goods, batches, third party sales, Order-related billing or Delivery-related billing:...
Business Process
Source of costing
- Order-related billing
Valuation price of the material master
- Delivery-related billing
Goods issue
Further there are various way to carry out costing at Sales order, like
- Product costing
- Unit costing
So, you can check whether EK01/EK02 or any other cost related is executing prior/take preference to VPRS in your pricing
Also. kindly check your entries for Account Determination for valuation area(T001K) by using TCode OMWD.
If everything is fine, then test run a Sales cycle till Billing, so as to see whether at billing VPRS is reflecting or not.
If in case you need further assistance, do let us know.
Regards
JP

BOM not picking correctly in Sales Order Costing

Hi,
During Sales Order costing of configurable material Say ABC is configurable material(finished material) and it has 4 components. I am using standard sales order costing variant as PPC4. During sales order costing from VA22(quotation) of the material ABC(finished material) system take its first two components during costing. Remaining two components system does not take. It shows correctly BOM usage as 2. But two components are missing during calculation.. What may be reaon or special configuration is required for sales order costing ?
Best Reagrds,
Samrat

Dear,
please check your condition type : Ek02
It is used for statistical posting. If you use this condition type, the result of unit costing is simply a statistical value which you can compare with the price. So, this can be can used instead of VPRS to calculate the profit margin for the assembly item.
Please note the following points:
1) The condition type must have condition category 'Q' (costing).
2) The condition type must agree with the condition type defined for unit costing in the pricing procedure.
So, EK01 & EK02 are the condition type that will display the results of the unit costing for certain type of sales document and can be used in Make To Order scenario.
Sales order cost estimate can be flow to COPA. Where you have to maintain setting in COPA in Define access to Standard cost estimate for costing key select sales order cost estimate.
For transfer SD to COPA you have to use Transaction KE4I here enter SD conditions with COPA Value fields.
So, whether EK01 or EK02, these will determine from Requirement class configuration. Requirement class in turn there is requirement type and requirement type is determined by item category and MRP type when you cost a sales order (valuated/non valuated sales order) at that time when save the cost estimate then the cost value automatically gets populated in your condition tab. Hence, if the item is not relevant to sales order costing then the cost comes from VPRS.
For more details please check below links
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPLO/VPRS%2C+EK01%28ActualCost%29andEK02%28Calculated+Cost%29
Std Cost Calculation in Sales Order - EK02 and by T-Code CK11N
Thanks,
Ram

ZPRS- Cost(data source H) condition type is not visible in CRM sales order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for