Should i update my bios ?

hello,
i have a ms-7798
i'm using the internal sound card that it has
but sometimes there is a small crackle sound
and then sometimes my pc freeze for 4-20 seconds or so(first screen freezes, after a second or so the sound)
so what do you guys think ?
should i flash my bios or not ?
if so how would i go about ?

Quote from: xmad on 18-October-13, 12:12:45
Do you have another PSU to test?
These issues don't particular sound like a bios issue. PSU or short right off the top, but updating may be a good first step after checking the ram.
Run memtest which is included with the forum flash tool:
>>Use the MSI HQ Forum USB flasher<<
I have also attached the latest bio, don't decompress the archive, just point the forum tool at it using mode 1 then at your usb flash drive.
saldy i dont have another PSU to test
i already did memtest before
sadly one of my two rams was damaged or what
so first i scanned both
then i took one out > got 4 errors or so
thn i took that one out and put the another in(in the middle it froze or something), so i did it again with no error
currently running on 4gb
i dont think a screen will freeze up though and then continue if it is the psu
in 1.5 > Update onboard Realtek PXE ROM.
in 1.5 and 1.6 > Improved PCI-E display card compatibility.

Similar Messages

  • Should I Update By Bios To The Newest?

    Should i update from 1.52 to 1.9 i think it is now?
    Any reason not too?

    If your system is stable and everything works then i can't see the point of updating bios, this will only fix known issues that if you don't have any off these issues then why risk a bad flash - dead mobo. But if you will gain from bios flashing then go for it, I would recommend going to 1.9 as this is alot more stable than any earlier bios.
    My 2 pence worth,
    Babyface uk

  • MS6309 V2 - Should I update my BIOS?

    I am running Windows XP Pro SP 2 on a PIII 667MHZ system, 128MB of RAM, 20G Hard Drive. 
    The computer was used at my Father In Law's Doctors office and was given to me after being wiped clean.  I had a hell of a time installing XP Pro, It would get part way through the install and it would lock up.  Almost acted as if the CD ROM drive had trouble reading the CD.  Finally got XP Pro installed after numerous attempts.  During the installation I used the option to delete the old partition and created a new partition, using NTFS (non-quick) format.
    My system seems to run O.K. but a little slow and will lock up every now and then when surfing the web.  I suspect I need more RAM.  I just ordered (3) 512MB PC133MHz Corsair Memory cards from New Egg which should help.
    Motherboard has this printed on it:
    CE VER:2
    MS 6309
    So should I assume it is a MS-6309 V2.x or a MS-6309 Lite?
    Widows XP shows that I have a SMBIOS Ver 2.3
    On boot up the upper left hand corner reads A6309MS Ver 3.2, so I assume I have the Ver 3.2 Bios.  Should I bother with a BIOS upgrade?  I see that I could update to Ver 3.8.  Would this help my system performance?  I plan on upgrading the graphics card, adding a 16x DVD burner, and adding a larger hard drive (100G)
    So, should I upgrade the BIOS?  (The Live Update option will not work on my system for some reason)
    I wouldn't want to srew things up if it is running fine now.  Also if I do decide to update should I use the MS-6309 V2.x or a MS-6309 Lite update?  I would also guess I would have to follow the procedure for   "Flashing the BIOS for Users using NON FAT file system" - am I correct?
    Any help would be greatly appreciated!
    Thanks,
    Mike

    Well I ran memtest86+ with all (3) 512M DIMMS installed.  And it passed 4 runs!  This is after I played with my BIOS settings a little. 
    Here are the changes I made to my BIOS:
    Disabled system BIOS cacheable and all shadowing.  Enabled Cache Bus ECC.  Disabled power management.  Disabled SDRAM timing by SPD.  Set DRAM frequency to 100MHz and CAS latency to 3.  Disabled ClkGen Spread Spectrum.  Set CPU Host / PCI Clock to auto.  Changed CPU ratio selection from 5.0X to 4.0X.  Changed CPU Vcore selection from Auto to 1.70V.  I am really not to confident with messing with BIOS settings, but this is what I came up with from all the research I have done.  There are still many functions in the BIOS that baffle me, and I can’t seem to find any information that can help me.
    I am still looking into a new PSU, and I am trying to find out how to raise the memory voltage from MSI tech support (I guess there might be a jumper I can change).
    It is sort of a trade off, more RAM (1.5G) less speed (100Mhz) instead of less RAM (1.0G) and more speed (133MHz). 
    Performance wise I wonder which set up is better?  Will my system perform faster with the (3) 512M DIMMS [1.5G] @ 100MHz or with the (2) 512M DIMMS [1.0G] @ 133MHz?  Will I ever really need the 1.5G of RAM?  The main use of my computer is for internet, word processing, spread sheets, budget programs, digital picture storage, GPS / mapping programs.

  • Should I update my drivers and software I see new drivers in late 2012..i have never updated

    should i update my bios, drivers etc. my computer is 3+ years old and I have never done any updating from HP

    You should only update your BIOS, if there is specific feature that has been added or fixed that you need support for. Flashing the BIOS is risky and should only be done when absolutely necessary.
    As far as the drivers are concerned, update them if they fix an issue you are experiencing or provide a new feature you want/need. Updating driver is much less less risky and easier to fix if needed.
    Please send KUDOs
    Frank
    {------------ Please click the "White Kudos" Thumbs Up to say THANKS for helping.
    Please click the "Accept As Solution" on my post, if my assistance has solved your issue. ------------V
    This is a user supported forum. I am a volunteer and I don't work for HP.
    HP 15t-j100 (on loan from HP)
    HP 13 Split x2 (on loan from HP)
    HP Slate8 Pro (on loan from HP)
    HP a1632x - Windows 7, 4GB RAM, AMD Radeon HD 6450
    HP p6130y - Windows 7, 8GB RAM, AMD Radeon HD 6450
    HP p6320y - Windows 7, 8GB RAM, NVIDIA GT 240
    HP p7-1026 - Windows 7, 6GB RAM, AMD Radeon HD 6450
    HP p6787c - Windows 7, 8GB RAM, NVIDIA GT 240

  • Should one update Embedded Controller program before a BIOS update ?

    Hello All,
    I have an IBM Thinkpad 600E 2645 4AU that has an old version of BIOS that am trying to update to the latest.
    I read on the net that before updating the BIOS its required to update the Embedded Controller program.
    This is what I read and am quoting :
    " It is also important to understand that Thinkpads from IBM have two separate firmwares: the BIOS, and the Embedded Controller program. A given BIOS version will require a certain version of the Embedded Controller program. The IBM documentation is sometimes unclear about the order in which these two firmwares should be updated. On most, but not all Thinkpads, the correct update order is Embedded Controller program first, and then the BIOS. Make sure to do the two updates immediately one after the other. Newer models from Lenovo update both the Embedded Controller program and the BIOS at the same time, so you don't have to worry about it."
    Could anyone let me know if this applies ? I searched the Lenovo site for a  Embedded Controller program for my laptop model but found none. So wondering if this model would require the Embedded Controller program update ?
    Thanks.
    Alex

    OK, I've fixed this now.
    I had Kaspersky Internet Security installed and had disabled it manually but it was obvisouly still blocking fundamental system changes like these.  I uninstalled KIS completely and then ran these updates again and all worked fine.

  • Should I update BIOS and hardware firmware when installing XP?

    I will soon be receiving a ThinkPad R61 and I plan to downgrade the OS to Windows XP by following this guide to the letter.  However, one part of the guide is unclear to me.
    It states that updating the BIOS and hardware firmware are optional.  How do I decide whether I should do this?  What are the consequences of not doing it?  How badly can I damage my computer by doing it incorrectly -- can I destroy it?
    Thanks! 

    As it says in the guide many times.
    "THE BIOS AND THE HARD DRIVE FIRMWARE UPDATE ARE
    NOT NECESSARY. IF YOU ARE WARY OF BIOS UPDATES, THEN I SUGGEST YOU SKIP
    THOSE TWO UPDATES AND CARRY ON WITH THE GUIDE."
    The BIOS updates sometimes fix errors that may or may not affect you. You would have to read the txt file associated with it to determine if you want to do it or not.  Some folks have to have the latest and greatest and some people have issues that are fixed in the BIOS update.
    A BIOS update gone wrong will render your Thinkpad completely useless.
    I think that if it is not broken, don't fix it.
    Be sure to make the recovery disc set before doing anything else.
    T60 2623-D7U, 3 GB Ram. Dual boot XP and Linux Mint.
    T400 2765-T7U Windows 7
    Registered Linux User #160145
    FYI: I am not employed by Lenovo

  • Should I Update BIOS?

    I have just built my system, and the BIOS are 1.1. All is going pretty well, no issues (apart from CoreCenter reporting my CPU temp at 120 degrees! LOL!), but maybe I should update the BIOS?
    What would be the best BIOS for my Clawhammer CG CPU? And what's the best way to update considering that I don't have a FDD?

    I just updated my BIOS from the original 1.10 to 1.30 and faulty CPU temp reporting problem seems to have gone a way.
    Originally the CPU (3200+ Newcastle core) temp was being reported as 70 degrees Celsius.  Manual verification of the temp (put my finger on the heatsink) revealed this to be erroneous.  
    After flashing the BIOS, the temp is now reported as 44 degrees Celsius.
    So far so good.
    BTW, I flashed using the LiveUpdate utility in Windows.  This was the first time I tried this and it worked.  Be aware you will get a prompt to create a BIOS recovery disk on your A:/ drive.
    Good luck with your box.

  • Should I apply this BIOS update

    My Toshiba Service Center shows BIOS 6.10 update released 10-29-2012.
    Present version is 1.30 with release date 4-26-2012.
    Should I apply this BIOS update?
    Toshiba Satellite P875-S7200 / Windows 7

    If I were you, Niki, I would NOT apply the BIOS update unless you are having some kind of problem that you think a BIOS update will cure. Don't try to fix something that ain't broke!!!  In this case, most of the changes from your version 1.30 to the 6.10 version have to do with Windows 8, not the Windows 7 you are using.
    C.B.
    C.B.
    Toshiba Sat. C75D-B7260 Win 8.1 64 Bit--Toshiba Sat. L775D-S7132 Win 7 HP SP1 64 Bit and Win 10 PRO Technical Preview--Toshiba Sat. L305-S5921 Win Vista SP2 32 Bit

  • Z77A-G43 and Core i5 2500K and BIOS 2.4, should i update to newer BIOS?

    Hello,
    I have this working config. without any issue:
    Z77A-G43
    Core i5 2500K
    2x4Gb GSKILL RipJaw @ 1600
    ASUS 7870
    PSU Corsair 750W
    My current BIOS version is 2.4. I've seen that the latest BIOS for Z77A-G43 is 2.8.
    Should i update to the latest version ? Does it make sense  ?

    Quote
    Should i update to the latest version ?
    Not unless something is in the change log that could be of a specific benefit. If and when a UEFI/BIOS does come along that is going to be of benefit, be sure to use the forum's USB method to minimize the chance of it ever going badly.
      >> Forum USB Flash Method <<

  • Satellite 1410-604 - BIOS update Incorrect BIOS update in the web?

    Hi there again!
    Now with a new and weird matter.
    We all know that old say... "If it is not break, don't fix it". And if you put it into more informatic terms, "specially if it is a BIOS".
    Yes, we all know that the BIOS is something quite dellitate to handle. For some reason we normally feel like if we were handling something like nitro-glycerine, or some radioactive product. And this is because we all know what is being put in risk in that moment: our (or sometimes others) computer, the full system could end as dead as some pieces of metal, plastic, and wires.
    Well. I passed through all of that more than ten times in my life, and only once it went wrong. But since that old motherboard was already dead, It was not important. But I allways was EXTREMELY care. I allways cross checked everything before doing anything, allways got a backup and a way to restore that backup... and allways did this in COMPAQ systems, that were prepared that way. Updating a BIOS was just about preparing a disk, turn on the PC with the disk in the diskette drive, and wait. And if you didn't like the results, you simply click "return to previus BIOS" and that was it... very nice. And easy.
    Few days ago, a friend brought me a Toshiba Satellite 1410-604 to solve some issues that were driving him crazy. After removing an expired Norton Internet Security, install avast and scan, I found more than one hundred files infected with a wide variety of virus, malware, trojans, and whatever you could imagine. Avast removed them all, but the remains of the operating system was so unstable that we decide to format and install from scratch.
    I asked for the restoration disks, that obviously he don't have because they were lost in one of his movings. After we got the confirmation from Toshiba reps that there are no recovery disk available for this model, because it is too old, we decided to install from scratch like any other normal PC, and resigned to loose some of the utilities that come with that CDs and that are not available for download in the website.
    I downloaded all of the software available for this model, including two BIOS updates. (Actually only one update, but in two versions: Windows and Traditional), and prepared a CD with all the drivers and programs just like if it were a brand new system install. And everything went very well, no problems at all. Until we got to the Wireless LAN card, but that is another issue that is already solved (the mini PCI card for the WLAN does not support WEP or WAP encription, and it is not possible to connect to any wireless LAN encripted).
    At this point, and when I started configuring and enabling PCMCIA devices, and USB devices (this computer only supports USB 1.1 not 2.0) I discovered this text in the Toshiba Website:
    "This Bios Update adds increased functionality to your system.
    (BIOS is an acronym for Basic Input and Output System. This program is stored in a Read-Only Memory chip on the motherboard.
    When the computer powers up, the BIOS is launched to perform various start-up functions.)
    For detailed update information please refer to Toshiba BIOS-Update Information"
    (you can find this here:
    [http://eu.computers.toshiba-europe.com/innovation/download_drivers_bios.jsp?service=EU] you have to look for:
    Archive
    Satellite
    Satellite 14xx
    Satellite 1410-604
    PS141E
    Quite specific. Isn't it?)
    According to the information in that same website, the BIOS available fits the following models:
    "Satellite 2410-414, Satellite 1410, Satellite 1410-654S, Satellite 1410-814, Satellite 2410-303, Satellite 2410-304S, Satellite 1410-354, Satellite 2410-601, Satellite 1410-401, {color:#ff0000}*Satellite 1410-604*{color}, Satellite 2410-404, Satellite 1410-301, Satellite 1410-304, Satellite 2410-S403, Satellite Pro 2100, Satellite 1410-S203, Satellite 2410-304, Satellite 1410-554, Satellite 1410-S102, Satellite 1410-354E, Satellite 2410-703, Satellite 1410-303, Satellite 2410-S203, Satellite 1410-801, Satellite 2410-603, Satellite 1410-902, Satellite 1410-313, Satellite 1410-802, Satellite 1410-714, Satellite 2410-354, Satellite 2410-514, Satellite 1410-614, Satellite 1410-704, Satellite 2410-515, Satellite 2410-504, Satellite 2410-702, Satellite 1410-S103"
    Yes... it's there!
    Now, when you go to the "Toshiba BIOS-Update Information", you get:
    "FAQ Ref.: TRO0000000b07
    A BIOS update is a {color:#ff0000}*relatively simple operation and can be carried out by most competent computer users*{color}. All BIOS upgrades can be obtained from "BIOS Update" Download Section click here..
    Note: The BIOS files are machine specific so the correct BIOS for your machine must be used."
    Please note that Toshiba does not disencourage the handling of BIOS, on the contrary: they even encourage people to do so. This is not necessary bad, but at the same time they encourage people to 'play around' with such a delicate matter, at the end of that same page, in little letters they say:
    "Toshiba provides this information "as is" {color:#ff0000}*without warranty of any kind*{color}, either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. Toshiba shall not be responsible for the topicality, correctness, completeness or quality of the information provided. {color:#ff0000}*Toshiba is not liable for any damage caused by the use of any information provided, including information that is incomplete or incorrect*{color}."
    This should trigger yellow alarms in our minds.
    +"Human error is inherent to humans, and it is not possible to erradicate. It will allways appear, sooner or later" (Prof. James Reason).+
    And finally I made the mistake. Even though I read that warning, I remembered all those successfull BIOS update with COMPAQ, and relied in Toshiba. That update was available there, and Toshiba was telling me that it was for this computer. Great!
    So finally I unplugged all devices (USB), removed the PCMCIA (WLAN),plugged the battery charger to avoid any possible battery problem, restarted windows, and then from within windows I started the updater (windows version, as recommended by Toshiba). Everithing looked fine, nothing different of what I used to see on those old COMPAQs.
    As warned by the updating program, the system was going to reboot. And actually it did so.
    Windows closed quite normally (a bit quicker than normal, but without errors, and since there were no other programs than the essentials -even the antivirus was not running-), the computer switched of, all lights off (normal), and then it switched on again...
    {color:#0000ff}*BEEEEEEEEEEEEP... BEEEP... BEEEEP...*{color}
    OMG! I never espected something THAT bad. 3-1-1!
    And now... What a 3-1-1 stands for here? Award BIOS would mean no video card or deffective video card, but it is not true, since it was working up to 20 seconds ago. It must be the BIOS.
    It never came again to life. It is still beeping 3-1-1.
    But now comes the investigation of the human-factors involved in this accident.
    I found I commited the following failures:
    *(1)* To rely in the manufacturer, even though they WROTE their information could be wrong or incomplete. (BAD if I were a QA&QC inspector).
    *(2)* I didn't cross checked deeply enough (until it was already too late).
    *(3)* I didn't looked previously for the way to make a backup of the BIOS, in order to restore should anything go wrong.
    *(4)* Let Toshiba lead me to a path I didn't want to walk, just because of their offer of "increased functionality".
    *(5)* Beleave in Toshiba when they said "relatively simple operation and can be carried out by most competent computer users"... they never said it is failproof.
    Then I started the most interesting part of the investigation.
    {color:#0000ff}*"What went wrong?"*{color}
    Obviously, the BIOS update failed somehow, somewhere. And I wanted to know what and where.
    First thing I discovered was that there are another search engine in Toshiba called "askiris" ([http://askiris.toshiba.com]) and I looked there in order to see if for any chance I could get the old 1.20 BIOS version that was installed originally in that machine.
    And I found something... VERY interesting:
    bq. {color:#800080}*From: * \\ {color}{color:#800080}* ACPI Flash BIOS version 1.10 for Satellite 1410/1415/2410* \\ {color}{color:#800080}* bios for these models. TAIS. Downloads. DL. 105481 289838 289838 ACPI Flash BIOS version 1.10 for Satellite 1410/1415/2410. 2002-10-04. 105589...* \\ {color}{color:#800080}* Published 10/4/02* \\ {color}{color:#800080}* From: * \\ {color}{color:#800080}* ACPI Flash BIOS version 1.40 for Satellite 1410/1415/2410/2415* \\ {color}{color:#800080}* FDD Version 1.30 TAIS. Downloads. DL. 105481 357972 357972 ACPI Flash BIOS version 1.40 for Satellite 1410/1415/2410/2415. 2003-01-31. 105589 PUB...* \\ {color}{color:#800080}* Published 1/31/03 | Rating:* \\ {color}{color:#800080}* From: * \\ {color}{color:#800080}* ACPI Flash BIOS version 1.20 for Satellite 1410/2410* \\ {color}{color:#800080}* error message during BIOS TAIS. Downloads. DL. 105481 305240 305240 ACPI Flash BIOS version 1.20 for Satellite 1410/2410. 2002-11-01. 105589 PUB...* \\ {color}{color:#800080}* Published 11/1/02 | Rating:* \\ {color}{color:#800080}* From: * \\ {color}{color:#800080}* ACPI Flash BIOS version 1.30 for Satellite 1410/1415/2410* \\ {color}{color:#800080}* 1) Changed the content TAIS. Downloads. DL. 105481 330963 330963 ACPI Flash BIOS version 1.30 for Satellite 1410/1415/2410. 2003-01-03. 105589...* \\ {color}{color:#800080}* Published 1/3/03 | Rating:* {color}
    Those are: V110, V140, V120 and V130 for series 1410/15 and 2410.
    GOOD! Or not?
    Let's take a look:
    First thing I did was download everything all four files.
    Then I took the same version that made the crash: 1.40
    Than I uncompressed the file, and I found:
    06/05/2009 00:17 &lt;DIR&gt; .
    06/05/2009 00:17 &lt;DIR&gt; ..
    31/01/2003 08:38 1,605,632 11410v14.iso
    31/01/2003 08:38 511,764 1370D14.EXE
    {color:#ff0000}*08/01/2003 17:03 724,480 2410a9v140.exe*{color}
    09/01/2003 09:32 250,663 biofca9t.com
    08/10/2002 05:26 30,697 chgbiosa.exe
    31/01/2003 08:36 1,087 instinfo.bat
    13/05/2002 15:25 378,175 launcher.exe
    31/01/2003 08:36 433 launcher.ini
    06/05/2009 00:17 0 list.txt
    31/01/2003 08:36 14,768 readme.com
    *{color:#ff0000}31/01/2003 08:36 12,513 readme.txt{color}*
    11 archivos 3,530,212 bytes
    3 dirs 9,404,600,320 bytes libres
    And I got my first surprise here: There is a {color:#ff0000}*README.TXT*{color} that was not present in the file I downloaded previously from the drivers repository.
    So I went to the readme.txt and I found this:
    "README.TXT 01-31-2003 CDC
    Flash BIOS version 1.40 for Satellite 1410
    This BIOS is applicable to the following models:
    Satellite 1410-S105
    Satellite 1410-S106
    Satellite 1410-S173
    Satellite 1410-S174
    Satellite 1410-S175
    Satellite 1410-S176
    Satellite 1415-S105
    Satellite 1415-S106
    Satellite 1415-S115
    Satellite 1415-S173
    Satellite 1415-S174
    Satellite 1415-S175
    Satellite 1415-S176
    Satellite 2410-S203
    Satellite 2410-S204"
    Please note that the model 1410-604 is *NOT* listed.
    I thought "well, it must be another archive..."
    But then I realized of a name that sounds familiar, it was there, in the directory where I uncompressed this 1.40 file, and the name is:
    {color:#0000ff}*2410A9V140.EXE*{color}
    So I took the other file, the BIOS_Win update, and I discovered that the file name is:
    *{color:#0000ff}2410A9V140.EXE{color}* (Ups!)
    So I uncompressed it again, to find:
    El volumen de la unidad D no tiene etiqueta.
    El n&pound;mero de serie del volumen es: 8838-E175
    Directorio de D:\Shared\diskette\2410A9v140
    06/05/2009 00:43 &lt;DIR&gt; .
    06/05/2009 00:43 &lt;DIR&gt; ..
    *{color:#0000ff}09/01/2003 09:32 _250,663_ BIOFCA9T.COM{color}*
    17/07/2002 03:38 35 biosupd2.ini
    13/07/2001 13:22 6,277 chgbios2.vxd
    *{color:#0000ff}08/10/2002 04:26 _30,697 _CHGBIOSA.EXE{color}*
    09/11/2001 09:14 134 clean2.reg
    17/07/2002 03:35 342,064 install2.exe
    16/07/2002 06:55 241,664 nchgbios2.exe
    18/08/2001 11:41 3,435 nchgbios2.sys
    23/10/2001 18:55 11,476 nchgbios2NT.sys
    26/08/2001 09:00 49,152 nchgbios2svc.exe
    13/07/2001 17:05 49,152 tbdecode.dll
    14/03/2002 06:42 49,152 TCHGBIOSInfo.dll
    21/06/2002 11:25 1,796 tosclean2.bat
    09/11/2001 12:01 967 tosclean2.pif
    21/06/2002 11:34 1,841 toscleanAUTO2.bat
    21/06/2002 11:44 1,796 toscleanSMS2.bat
    21/06/2002 08:51 2,038 tosntclean2.bat
    21/06/2002 08:51 2,084 tosntcleanAUTO2.bat
    21/06/2002 08:52 2,038 tosntcleanSMS2.bat
    20 archivos 1,046,461 bytes
    2 dirs 9,402,793,984 bytes libres
    No readme file...
    Then another question arised in my mind: What about the other 1.40 file? What does the other 2410A9V140.EXE have inside?
    This:
    El volumen de la unidad D no tiene etiqueta.
    El n&pound;mero de serie del volumen es: 8838-E175
    Directorio de D:\Shared\diskette\comparacion_toshiba\askiris\241 0a9v140
    06/05/2009 00:46 &lt;DIR&gt; .
    06/05/2009 00:46 &lt;DIR&gt; ..
    *{color:#0000ff}09/01/2003 09:32 _250,663 _BIOFCA9T.COM{color}*
    17/07/2002 03:38 35 biosupd2.ini
    13/07/2001 13:22 6,277 chgbios2.vxd
    *{color:#0000ff}08/10/2002 04:26 _30,697 _CHGBIOSA.EXE{color}*
    09/11/2001 09:14 134 clean2.reg
    17/07/2002 03:35 342,064 install2.exe
    16/07/2002 06:55 241,664 nchgbios2.exe
    18/08/2001 11:41 3,435 nchgbios2.sys
    23/10/2001 18:55 11,476 nchgbios2NT.sys
    26/08/2001 09:00 49,152 nchgbios2svc.exe
    13/07/2001 17:05 49,152 tbdecode.dll
    14/03/2002 06:42 49,152 TCHGBIOSInfo.dll
    21/06/2002 11:25 1,796 tosclean2.bat
    09/11/2001 12:01 967 tosclean2.pif
    21/06/2002 11:34 1,841 toscleanAUTO2.bat
    21/06/2002 11:44 1,796 toscleanSMS2.bat
    21/06/2002 08:51 2,038 tosntclean2.bat
    21/06/2002 08:51 2,084 tosntcleanAUTO2.bat
    21/06/2002 08:52 2,038 tosntcleanSMS2.bat
    20 archivos 1,046,461 bytes
    2 dirs 9,402,781,696 bytes libres
    *{color:#ff0000}They both have 20 files, and 1,046,461 bytes. I asumed they are both the SAME file{color}*.
    And the readme file does not list the model 1410-604 in its readme file, therefore I cannot explain this except as a mistake from Toshiba. *{color:#ff0000}They put an incorrect BIOS in their website, and suggested the update, and somehow leaded to this kind of errors.{color}*
    (Except in the case that one of those models is a different name of the 1410-604 model, and if it is the case... now I don't know why this BIOS do not work with this computer).
    The worst part is that neither of those other files (V1.10, 1.20 and 1.30) lists the 1410-604, therefore there seems no possible workaround for this problem. I need an original v1.20 for this CMOS, and Toshiba seems not to have it. They offered me to solve the problem, by leaving the notebook at an ASP, and paying only 95&euro; for the work and about 280&euro; for a motherboard replacement, I will get it solved. But they offer no warranty of their possibilities because is a model 'too old' and 'discontinued' and with 'no support'...
    In other words, they said "don't bother with this, just go out there and buy a new one" (something absolutely out of my scope in this crisis-time) :P
    Thank you for reading soooo far.
    Now what I need is to get any ideas of a workaround for this, my ideas are:
    (1) This CMOS has a boot-part that still works (it allows a roll-back if you have the appropriate file). So I need a good BIOS to burn into the CMOS, from the VERY SAME model (a BIOS backup) but the backup must be adequate for the burning program (CHGBIOSA.COM).
    (2) It is still possible that the BIOS could be OK but the data on the CMOS got somehow corrupted. If so, clearing the CMOS could solve de problem. But I was not able to find a clear cmos button from outside, and after disasembling I took of the battery, with no good results. I have to try leaving the MOBO without battery for longer period (I left it about 20 seconds) just in case 20 seconds don't allow all the capacitors to fully go to zero values. I have not much hope in this point.
    (3) Try to get a REAL good update from Toshiba. I contacted several times technical support, and I was able to verify they are only phone-operators, with a script in front of them, and when the problem goes-out-of-scope they fall always in the same answer: "you have to go to an ASP". I still have a low hope to find someone who really knows a bit, and could enlighten with a good BIOS to put in this disks.
    (4) As far as I could find, this BIOS is not from any known BIOS-maker. It seems it has been developed by Toshiba (own brand), therefore the Crisis Recovery Disk from Phoenix will not be of any help here. As well as any other BIOS recovery tool not designed for Toshiba's BIOS. But I'm open to any ideas, that could be tested more or less safely. (Remember that the 'BIOS-BOOT-PART' feature is still working, I don't want to loose this only possibility of redemption).
    Wwwaaaaoooowww... what a long-post falks! Sorry for that!
    Forgive me, but I wanted to be really clear.
    Should anyone give some hints or advice, will be greatly appreciated.
    Please don't say what I shouldn't do... I already know that. I already researched and already found my mistakes, in order not to repeat them. Now I need to move on, to advance, and to try to solve this, or at least learn how to solve similar things. As much as possible.
    Thank you again, in advance, and sorry again.
    FenixDigital
    Message was edited by: Fenix_D
    Changed subject to beter reflect what is the matter about (apparently erroneous BIOS file in Toshiba download center).

    Well.<br />
    <br />
    It's not dead, certainly.<br />
    <br />
    The steps that I put in my procedure were:<br />
    <br />
    --&gt; There are two memory sims, that I am going to identify as M1 and M2<br />
    --&gt; There are two memory banks, that I am going to identify as A and B<br />
    <br />
    Next step in order to identify if there are some module or bank that is not working properly are:<br />
    <br />
    The modules were installed as:<br />
    <br />
    M1 --&gt; A<br />
    M2 --&gt; B<br />
    <br />
    <strong>1--&gt; Boot without any memory chip.</strong><br />
    <br />
    <blockquote>
    A--&gt; X<br />
    B--&gt; X<br />
    </blockquote>
    <br />
    <strong>2--&gt; Boot with ONE module</strong><br />
    <br />
    <blockquote>
    A--&gt;M1<br />
    B--&gt;X<br />
    </blockquote>
    <br />
    <strong>3--&gt; Boot with the OTHER module</strong><br />
    <br />
    <blockquote>
    A--&gt; X<br />
    B--&gt; M2<br />
    </blockquote>
    <br />
    <strong>4--&gt; Boot with BOTH modules swapped:</strong><br />
    <br />
    <blockquote>
    A--&gt; M2<br />
    B--&gt; M1<br />
    </blockquote>
    <br />
    <strong>5--&gt; Boot with ONE module swapped:</strong><br />
    <br />
    <blockquote>
    A--&gt; M2<br />
    B--&gt; X<br />
    </blockquote>
    <br />
    <strong>6--&gt; Boot with the OTHER module swapped:</strong><br />
    <br />
    <blockquote>
    A--&gt; X<br />
    B--&gt; M1<br />
    </blockquote>
    <br />
    At this point I got a great difference. It booted, finally. But in order to make a diagnostic, I have to complete the full test, and the results were:<br />
    <br />
    1--&gt; Boot without any memory chip.<br />
    <br />
    A--&gt; X<br />
    B--&gt; X<br />
    <br />
    <strong>NOT BOOTING</strong> Actually the computer not even tries to read the disk. Only the power led turns on, but even prior to press the 'on/off' button. I think this indicates 'no memory installed'. I would have expected a post failure beeps, but there were no beeps at all.<br />
    <br />
    2--&gt; Boot with ONE module<br />
    <br />
    A--&gt;M1<br />
    B--&gt;X<br />
    <br />
    <strong>BOOTED NORMALLY</strong> Well. This obviously means that the 3-1-1 beep code means memory error, or one bank failing of two installed. Now I didn't know if the problem was the module, or the bank B.<br />
    <br />
    3--&gt; Boot with the OTHER module<br />
    <br />
    A--&gt; X<br />
    B--&gt; M2<br />
    <br />
    <strong>NOT BOOTING</strong> Just like the condition in 1. Like no memory installed, therefore there are two possibilities: The bank B is not working, or the memory module M2 is not working.<br />
    <br />
    4--&gt; Boot with BOTH modules swapped:<br />
    <br />
    A--&gt; M2<br />
    B--&gt; M1<br />
    <br />
    <strong>NOT BOOTING</strong> Just like previous to test condition. Beep code 3-1-1, no boot at all.<br />
    <br />
    5--&gt; Boot with ONE module swapped:<br />
    <br />
    A--&gt; M2<br />
    B--&gt; X<br />
    <br />
    <strong>NOT BOOTING</strong> This was the important test, because it finally let me determine that the problem is at the module 2 (M2) not at the bank B. But still there could be a failure IN THE BANK B and IN THE MEMORY MODULE 2. Have to do the other test.<br />
    <br />
    6--&gt; Boot with the OTHER module swapped:<br />
    <br />
    A--&gt; X<br />
    B--&gt; M1<br />
    <br />
    <strong>BOOTING NORMALLY</strong> This really confirmed there is nothing wrong with ANY bank, but one of the modules is not working, actually is not being even detected. This is quite weird, because this computer was working perfectly with those two modules, and in the moment of the BIOS upgrade it seems to fail... How come?<br />
    <br />
    Something weird happened here. I don't know what, but something ruined one memory module (fortunately only one), what I would like to know now is what happened. But at least I have the machine running, with very low memory, but running.<br />
    <br />
    What I am thinking now is what about this BIOS upgrade makes the motherboard not to recognize one of the modules for some reason?<br />
    <br />
    <img class="jive-emoticon" src="images/emoticons/happy.gif" border="0" alt=":)" /><br />
    <br />
    I will continue my research, but certainly the memory made the difference.<br />
    <br />
    I am not sure why I didn't discover this before, I think I didn't perform this test before, for two reasons:<br />
    <br />
    (1) I tried to boot with no memory, and this was impossible, so I assumed that the problem was not at the memory.<br />
    <br />
    (2) When I heard the beep code (3-1-1), somewhere I read it was a video problem, and I asume most probably it was a video problem (since no video at all was being displayed) but I should have take into consideration that Phoenix BIOS also means with the same 3-1-1 a DMA problem (memory problem).<br />
    <br />
    Okis... It's a pitty having to wait so much between a post and it's approval. I posted my answer two days ago, and since it didn't appear, I believe It didn't upload, so I replied again, and also didn't appeared... until now. It is obvious that a moderator approval is required. That's why I have to wait 24 hours or more to read my post. This slows this forum effectiveness.<br />
    <br />
    Thank you very much for your help. I'll keep you informed. Until we get to a final diagnosis and solution.

  • How can I update the BIOS without using a CD?

    Hello!
    I have recently decided to upgrade my RAM from 2GB to 4GB. After installing, I booted up my computer to find that it would not recognize the new memory. After doing a bit of troubleshooting, I decided to try and update the BIOS, as the version was from 2010. I downloaded the BIOS update boot CD application from lenovo, burned a disc, and on reboot I found that the boot order did not have CD listed on it. Here's the catch: I don't have the supervisor password. This is a hand-me-down laptop, and I have tried to find the password to no avail. This is the current boot order: USB drive, Hard drive. 
    My question is, can I either create a BIOS update disc using a USB, or update the BIOS some other way?
    I understand that it is impossible to recover the supervisor password without having it serviced (which I would rather not do, even if I have to send my RAM back to Crucial)
    My system specs:
    Thinkpad L512
    Bios version: 1.04
    Bios date: 2010-3-26
    Embeded Controller Version: 1.01
    Windows 7 32 bit
    Thanks for your help.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Welcome to the forum!
    Two things here:
    a) If you run System Update, it should offer the latest BIOS for your machine as well. I've never done it on a passworded unit, so it might or might not work but might be worth a shot.
    b) I doubt that the ability of the system to recognize new RAM has anything to do with the BIOS. ThinkPads much older than yours will run 4-8GB RAM with an old BIOS, older than your machine to begin with.
    Good luck.
    Cheers,
    George
    In daily use: R60F, R500F, T61, T410
    Collecting dust: T60
    Enjoying retirement: A31p, T42p,
    Non-ThinkPads: Panasonic CF-31 & CF-52, HP 8760W
    Starting Thursday, 08/14/2014 I'll be away from the forums until further notice. Please do NOT send private messages since I won't be able to read them. Thank you.

  • Updating my BIOS, have stability problem

    Hi
    I have been told on a PC tech forum that my new motherboard may be compatible with this CPU I bought ages ago.
    intel Core 2 Quad
    Freq. 2.50GHz
    FSB 1333MHz
    L2 Cache 4MB
    Core 45nm
    Socket LGA 775
    PCG 05A
    Q8300
    Support List
    http://www.msi.com/index.php?func=prodcpu2&prod_no=1470&maincat_no=1#menu
    But they said I had to update my bios to 1.2 in order for it to work.
    BIOS Updates
    http://www.msi.coOSindex.php?func=downloaddetail&type=bios&maincat_no=1&prod_no=1470
    I am new at this and I don't want to damage my PC.
    I've been reading about and I think my PC may be unstable and I hear that I shouldn't update because of that.
    I occationally have hardware failure crashes (blue screen) and I was hoping that this new processor could change all of that (I have narrowed down the source of the crashes to my hard drive, RAM(maybe) or processor).
    It might be the case that my BIOS is already 1.2 and I can skip all of this but I don't know how to check my current version.
    System Information
    Time of this report: 10/13/2009, 22:49:57
    Operating System: Windows Vista™ Home Premium (6.0, Build 6001) Service Pack 1 (6001.vistasp1_gdr.090302-1506)
    Language: English (Regional Setting: English)
    System Manufacturer: MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD
    System Model: MS-7528
    BIOS: Default System BIOS
    Processor: Intel® Pentium® D CPU 2.80GHz (2 CPUs), ~2.8GHz
    Memory: 3326MB RAM
    Page File: 1397MB used, 5476MB available
    Windows Dir: C:\Windows
    DirectX Version: DirectX 10
    DX Setup Parameters: Not found
    DxDiag Version: 6.00.6001.18000 32bit Unicode
    DxDiag Notes
    Display Tab 1: No problems found.
    Display Tab 2: No problems found.
    Sound Tab 1: The file cmuda3.sys is not digitally signed, which means that it has not been tested by Microsoft's Windows Hardware Quality Labs (WHQL). You may be able to get a WHQL logo'd driver from the hardware manufacturer.
    Sound Tab 2: No problems found.
    Input Tab: No problems found.
    DirectX Debug Levels
    Direct3D: 0/4 (retail)
    DirectDraw: 0/4 (retail)
    DirectInput: 0/5 (retail)
    DirectMusic: 0/5 (retail)
    DirectPlay: 0/9 (retail)
    DirectSound: 0/5 (retail)
    DirectShow: 0/6 (retail)
    Display Devices
    Card name: ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series
    Manufacturer: ATI Technologies Inc.
    Chip type: ATI Radeon Graphics Processor (0x9442)
    DAC type: Internal DAC(400MHz)
    Display Memory: 2426 MB
    Dedicated Memory: 1018 MB
    Shared Memory: 1407 MB
    Current Mode: 1024 x 768 (32 bit) (75Hz)
    Monitor: Generic PnP Monitor
    Driver Version: 8.14.0010.0671 (English)
    DDI Version: 10.1
    Driver Attributes: Final Retail
    Driver Date/Size: 5/16/2009 04:08:32, 3064832 bytes
    WHQL Logo'd: Yes
    PSU: 500W
    Thanks
    Russ

    Hi Henry, thanks for responding.
    I have changed my sig, hope its alright.
    I will give some info on my stability problem. I'm a novice when it comes to pc hardware so sorry if I come off a bit dense.
    For a while now I have had the same anoying problem with my PC. HD videos and video games run really slow, it's not that I am unable to play them it's just that my PC struggles and they stutter, even though I have been told that my PC should be able to handle them no problem. And my PC keeps crashing sometimes with and sometimes without a blue screen hardware failure.
    Over the last couple years I have been upgrading my PC, I added 3gig of ram, then I got an nVidia 8500, then PSU, motherboard, added another internal hdd but the same problem pursists. The only components I haven't upgraded are my CPU and my original hard drive. Everytime I upgrade, my PC runs a little bit faster, but still not as it should be.
    I recently got Win7 from my university and I tried to install it on a partition but everytime I try I get a blue screen (hardware failure)
    The weird thing is half the time when my PC crashes, it will crash again but if I'm lucky, if I can restart my PC after I get a bue screen, then my PC will run perfectly fine, HD vidoes work perfectly and so do my games. Usually to get my PC into this state, I need to keep restarting my PC just waiting for it to crash so my PC works properly.
    I'm guessing that it's either, my CPU, hard drive or ram(maybe) causing the problem. I have tested each stick of ram individually but it didn't make a difference in my performance so I assume they are both fine (or it's both of them).
    right now I'm trying to upgrade my CPU to the
    intel Core 2 Quad
    Freq. 2.50GHz
    FSB 1333MHz
    L2 Cache 4MB
    Core 45nm
    Socket LGA 775
    PCG 05A
    Q8300
    But I need to update my BIOS to 1.2 (currently I am 1.1), which I am reluctant to do because I'm worried that my PC will crash.
    Thanks
    Russ

  • What's with updating VGA bios? Is this necessary if your hardware is fine?

    How much improvement does it do really? Does it make the images look better? Does the fps improve fignificantly, if at all? Does it make the card cooler? Some treat it like a wonder cure. Is it?

    VGA BIOS update is only issued to address a particular issue, you should only update it if absolutely necessary!!
    Updating your VGA BIOS won't make your card faster, run cooler, or make images look better. But if it goes wrong, it will make your card dead!

  • When updating vga bios nothing happens

    Hi,
    i've got MX440-8X on Athlon XP 1800+
    I'm trying to update the bios using Live update. This could be necessary for the drivers to run under linux. (also problems there )
    While running the utility everything apears to go well except the screen does not go blank like stated.
    Afterwards it ask to restart the system, and when I run Liveupdate again it looks like nothing has happened because it offers the same update over again.
    Does anybody have any idea what goes wrong?
    Any help is greatly appreciated,
    Thanx!

    Is the BIOS Rev. of the card the same as what live updates has to offer. I bet that it is. Anyway there should not be any reason to update the BIOS on your video card unless you want problems.  live update Suck's allways has allways will.

  • Satellite A110-195 after update of bios ask for password

    After i update the bios that i download form the toshiba website for the laptop and update if from the windows he ask for the reboot. After reboot notebook start asking for password for bios and system password too. now i cant get to the system.
    I try default passwords like Toshiba,BIOS, CMOS, phoenix, and PHOENIX. and didn't work. CMOS battery in a110-195 is soderd on motherboard. Is there any jumpers that i need to bypass to clear cmos.

    Hi
    Thats strange buddy.
    Why should BIOS set a password automatically after the update???
    Anyway. As far as I know the BIOS password can be removed only by an ASP technician only these guys know how to remove the BIOS password
    I think the ASP is your last chance to get the BIPS password removed from the system

Maybe you are looking for