Simple QA --- make structure

in se11 how i make structure
and how i change ztable to structure

Hi
To Make new structure follow the following steps:
1. Select datatype write some zname enter & then u can choose structure .
2. Press Create.
3. Then you can enetr fields to your structure.
To Change Ztable to structure:
1. go to se11 & create a ztable
2.In the table control interface put .INCLUDE under field name <struc name> under data element
Press enter.
Finally you will get a new table with fields of previous ztable.
do activate the new ztable you have created.
All The Best
Priyanka
Do Reward Points.

Similar Messages

Simple types and structure

Hi
can any one tell me Difference between simple types and structure ?
Thanks,
Kiran

Hi Ravi,
As my concern there is difference between simple type and structure.
1SIMPLE TYPEit behave as TYPE proprty of value attibute .suppose you will create on value attribute as simAtt.then you can put that simple type in your attribute TYPE property .actualy it treated as data type like string,integer........
one more thing you want to change data type in your application then you will create SIMPLE TYPE..then put it TYpe property of value Attribute
Ex--you want to change the format of double value using "," then you will change only by using simple type.
STRUCTURE---Basically it use for creating for context value node in any context of controller(View,component )if you creat one structure then add number of attribute .when you create context value node then you binding the structure then automatically it will populate with value node as structure name and attribute .
SIMPLE TYPE---only put as Data type of Attribute and simple type also use within Structure at time of creation
STRUCTURE---you can use for DAta type of Apptibute..
thanks
Jati

How to make structure of database Proprietary

Hello
I am really interested in how to obscure the structure of database and make it proprietary.
thanks

Hello,
most LR users only use one catalog, which fine in most cases.
Some professional photographers use one catalog per client (with one image folder per client).
I know, this is no answer to your question, but perhapst you rethink your decision to have muliple catalogs. (Or explain, why you need them).

Simple question - make an image the original size

Hello everyone. I have a very simple question. How do I make an image that I have inserted into a pages document display at the original image size. I have selected the image, brought up the inspector and selected the Graphic inspector but it does not seem to give you that option.
You would have thought this would be easy wouldn't you? I am seriously considering going back to microsoft office at this rate!!!

Hello
Don't drop Pages for that
If the picture is not at its original size a button is active.
If the picture is at its original size the same button is greyed.
If it is too simple, you may *go to "Provide Numbers Feedback" in the "Numbers" menu*, describe what you wish.
Then, cross your fingers, and wait for iWork'09
Yvan KOENIG (from FRANCE jeudi 17 janvier 2008 22:17:18)

Why won't simple dissolves make the round trip back to FCP?

I have read in the Color manual and in certain places (here and the COW), that simple video transitions should be able to make the round trip back from Color to Final Cut Pro. I have a video that I prepped for Color, only it does contain a few cross dissolves. Everything is on one track, and the grading is done. I see my dissolves in the Color timeline. When I go back to FCP, however, they are gone. Obviously, with there being no handles on Color video, I can't add them later.
I understand that I could send the clips I want to perform dissolves on with handles over to color, grade them, and send them back and THEN make the dissolve, but this would be an elaborate waste of time. Is there a setting somewhere that I'm overlooking? Why, when all indications are that it will work, will it not work?
Any input would save me from re-doing this whole edit.
Thanks.
Stats: Running Final Cut Studio 2
            Mac Pro
            FCP version 7.0.3
            Color version 1.5.3
All clips involved in this edit were QT at MPEG-2 Video, Linear PCM, Timecode
Dimensions 1280x720
Let me know if you need more info.

Color doesn't work with MPEG-2 video. It works with FCP codecs... ProRes, DVCPRO HD, HDV, XDCAM. And only renders out as ProRes or Uncompressed. I've done over 100 onlines using Color, and every one of them kept the transitions intact. Every one. The fact that it isn't for you, means you are doing something wrong...and your codec is the obvious culprit.

Simple question, make symbol/instance "transperent"

Hi guys.
My problem is quite simple but I havent found a way to solve it yet. I want to make my symbol/instances (dont know the difference) transperent. And, when I have a button, I want only the button itself to be clickable not a bit of the white space around.
When I draw something directly in Flash it seems to work fine just as I want it, but I work in paint for the moment and will be using Photoshop too, so then I cant use just Flash's tools.
//Sebastian

When using Photoshop, for example, save your transparent image as a .psd and import it into Flash. I've never had success with copy/paste into flash for transparent images.
Now as far as clickable areas go, if you're using a transparent bitmap for a button skin -- and it has transparent areas you don't want clicked, you can create a mask within flash to 'hide' the transparent areas.
HTH,
-Ted

What's the simple Flash Maker?

Hey,
I wish to know that do have any simple and easy FLASH maker for Mac to use with iWeb?
or
Any good idea to make the front page more attractive as FLASH job?

Store your SWF file on your iDisk>Web>Sites folder
[Open this page|http://web.mac.com/wyodor/iFrame/ifflash.html] and save the source code of it to your disk.
Open the saved page in a texteditor.
Change the path of the SWF file.
Change the width and height.
Delete this code *<link href="css/if_flash.css" type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" />*
Delete the code between <body> & <object> and between </object> & </body>.
Save the file to iDisk>Web>Sites
In iWeb paste this code in a HTML Snippet
+<object name="ifrechts" data="/YourUserID/if_flash.html" type="text/html" standby="Inhoud" style="width: 630px; height: 600px; overflow: hidden"></object>+
Change the path in data and the width & height.
Publish your iWeb page to dotMac.

Simple two level structure

This is a two part exercise...
1. Complete ABAP program zstudent_registration. The program will display the first level list. The list consists of fields:
course_id
course_name
course_type
programme 
(The records come from the database table zshafeek_course.)
2. The second level list consists of students registered for a course selected from the first level list. The tables involved is zshafeeek_student_registered.
The fields in the zshafeek_student_registered are:
 course_id
 student_id
 student_name
 student_major
The fields that need to be displayed on the list are:
 student_id
 student_name
 student_major
(List the modifications with its ABAP statements required in program zstudent_registraton in order to generate the detail list).
Ive already done it, just need to compare it with someone else's for correctness' purposes...
Any help?

I got ur point and everything looks good with respect logic..
Now you want to display header level and item level type list.
Then use Example program,you will get good idea in ALV.
Program : BCALV_TEST_HIERSEQ_LIST
Main FM : REUSE_ALV_HIERSEQ_LIST_DISPLAY
if you want to display in normal way ,then use Internal table events
AT first
endat
at new
enat
at end of
endat.
at last
endat.
Reward Points if it is useful
Thanks
Seshu

How to make a simple control value comparison a user event?

Hey everyone,
I am trying (with no luck) to figure out how to make an event out of a simple control comparison without having to put the controls inside a while loop to be polled or in the event structure.
For example; how do I make an event when 'numerical control 1' equals 'numerical control 2'?
I know that I could have these inside a while loop with the event structure and then wire the comparison to a boolean, then reference the boolean's value change event. But rather, I would like to create an event for the comparison without the boolean and outside the while loop such that the loop doesn't have to run through the comparison each time, and doesn't have to poll the controls and bool.
Thanks for the help

Attached is a simple user event structure that I was thinking about. Using this you can decouple the control from the comparison, it just works on valye comparisons. Since it uses the event structure there is no polling and is very CPU friendly. I have allowedfor the comparison to be linked to the "Value 1:value change event" and the compare button true event. I hope this is what you were looking at. Also since it is a user event which is dynamically registered you can register/unregister it at will durring execution making it a flexable event handler. It might be alittle buggy because I have spent about 3 minutes developing it (particularry when passing values into the event structure there might be a state issue from the data flow so local variables are a better choice)
Paul
Paul Falkenstein
Coleman Technologies Inc.
CLA, CPI, AIA-Vision
Labview 4.0- 2013, RT, Vision, FPGA
Attachments:
CompareEventvi.vi ‏49 KB

How to create a simple File structure for a large project?

Hi to all,
I've own and operated my own website design/development (a 1 woman office, plus many sub-contractors) over the period of 8 years. I started hand-coding HTML sites in 1997, before the creation DW (though I think the first ver was for Mac in '97). Over the recent years I've udated my skills to include CSS and enough Java/PHP to customize and/or troubleshoot current projects (learn as I go).
The majority of my clients have been other 1-10 person entrepreneur companies. I've recently won a bid to redesign a government site which consist of 30 departments, including their main site.
The purpose of this thread is to get some ideas on creating a file management/structure. Creating file management setup for smaller companies was a piece of cake, using a simple file mgmt structure within DW. Their current file structure is all over the place. I've read about a very good, simple file struture in a DW CS4 manual and wanted to get feedback on different methods that have worked, and have not worked, or your client:
Here's my thinking:
1. within the root dir place home.htm and perhaps a few .htm related only to home
    2. create the following folders off the root, "docs, imgs/global, CSS, FLA, Departments"
            - sub folders within docs for each dept
            - site wide css's placed into CSS
            - site wide FLAs into the FLA
            - sub-folders created within 'imgs' for each dept, including a 'global folder' for sitewide images and menu imgs (if needed)
- OR -
1. create same file structure for each dept folder, such as 'imgs/CSS/FLA/Docs'
Open for suggestions....
Ciao

It is a problem I have thought over at length and still feel what I use could be better. You are doing it the right way around researching before you start, as moving files once things are underway can course real problems. One issue is the use of similar assets across site(s), and version control if you have multiple versions of the same asset.
Can not say I have built a site(s) of that size but would recommend putting together a flow chart to help visualise the structure and find out better ways organising (works for me). Good luck, post back with your solution.

MAPPING PROBLEM - SIMPLE vs. ADVANCED FUNCTIONS

Dear all,
I got an IDOC-EDIFACT Mapping, which deals a lot with container variables to prestructure the complex and nested target structure, provide counter and some actual/"you are here"-variables for the reason, that the segments of the target structure are mostly build from the same type, but different filled, depending on what they represent.
Filling this target segments I need simple functions, which provide my "your are in a ABC segment"-variables to orientate and then I need most of the time a advanced function, which searches e.g. positions in the source structure (imagine POSNR) and get depending "You are here..."-variable relevant data to map. This is where I get problems. I don't get it totally, yet...but it seems like, how often my field mapping (The different connected functions leading to target field) for one field is processed, depends on the number of the target field itself, as long as you use simple functions (make sense), when I use advanced functions (soesn't matter ,in which step in my field mapping), the field mapping seems to run only once (still makes sense, because you queue the source field entries), but how does it work if I have to use both function types.
Can some one please help?
Thank you in advance...
Daniel

Thanks for your answer,
I am into contextes and your tips would normally work and make me go, but... my problem ist a little more complicate. Let's see I try to explain it in another way.
If you map a constant or a simple function to a target element - you don't care for the occurency of your source element or simple functions, right? This is because, independent from a source element (with the correct occurency matching the target element) XI takes care that your constant is repeated often enough to build so many target elements as needed.
If you use advanced Functions, its little more complicate, then you have allready to provide a queue, which tells the advanced function - how many times to run and how how many result entries to create, 'cause these must match with the number of occurency of your target element (in simple words: you control the number of runs, that your single field mapping is processed).
Question: What happens if I use simple Functions (Which should be called every time and context, the target field should be build - in a single context) and advanced function(which should identify, depending on the result of the actual simple function call values from queued source fields) in a single element-mapping?
What controlls the number of runs? Me or XI? How to provide the right number of entries from my advanced function without knowing before, how many target elements must be build and without a direct dependency from source elements?
Thanks for thinking about this...

'Menu too Complex' Error with Simple Subtitles

Hi,
I am buildling a DVD with the option to turn subtitles on and off. I have built what I thought was a pretty simple configuration to achieve. See diagram and error message below. I have successful bult a similar disc, a blu-ray, with significantly more complexity and content with no problem. I am trying to build a similar, simple subtitle centric structure for 3 individual video products, but each project I create fails to build the disc in the end with the same error message. Any suggestions?
I am using CS6 on a Windows7 PC platform. Encore v. 6.0.2.004. Can provide more specs as necessary.
Thanks!
Lindsay

Based on other threads, it is not the navigation, but the subtitle formatting (margins or fonts or such). Margins must be adjusted upon import.
I have not tested any of these solutions.
This is the one that seemed the most likely to work:
http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/145/865932#870828
Dave Knop said:
"You make the adjustments upon importing the file.
If you created your subtitles within Encore, the only way I know to see the full list of settings is this:
Select a subtitle track on your timeline and from the top menu, click Timeline > Export Subtitles. Save the file. Now with that same track selected on your timeline, Re-import the file.
(Timeline > Import Subtitles )
Upon import of this file you should see the FULL range of Subtitle setting options in the menu. The margins will be the numbers defaulted at (72 648)/(48 432) The 72/648 numbers are the left and right margins that seem to cause the error.
Setting them to 92 (left) and 628 (right) has worked for me."
Please let us know.

Simple Transformation - ABAP 2 XML

Dear all,
Finally I was able to transform an internal table to xml using ST. The question is: Can I create different structured XML-files using the same (structured) internal table. Or is there some kind of a 1:1 relationship (between an ITAB structure + XML structure)?
1) Data declaration
TYPES: BEGIN OF ty_curr,
 tcurr TYPE tcurr_curr,
 gdatu TYPE gdatu_inv,
 ukurs TYPE ukurs_curr.
TYPES: END OF ty_curr.
DATA: gt_tcurr TYPE TABLE OF ty_curr.
2) Data selection
Select * into corresponding fields of table gt_tcurr from tcurr where...
3) Transformation ABAP 2 XML
 CALL TRANSFORMATION z_tcurr
 SOURCE root = gt_tcurr
 RESULT XML g_xml_string.
<?sap.transform simple?>
<tt:transform xmlns:tt="http://www.sap.com/transformation-templates">
<tt:root name="ROOT"/>
<tt:template>
 <tt:serialize>
 <rates>
 <tt:loop name="line" ref=".ROOT">
 <currency>
 <tt:value ref="$line.tcurr"/>
 </currency>
 <date>
 <tt:value ref="$line.gdatu"/>
 </date>
 <rate>
 <tt:value ref="$line.ukurs"/>
 </rate>
 </tt:loop>
 </rates>
 </tt:serialize>
</tt:template>
</tt:transform>
Result (XML)
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <rates>
<currency>USD</currency>
<date>01.01.2010</date>
<rate>-1.1868</rate>
<currency>EUR</currency>
<date>01.01.2010</date>
<rate>-1.1791</rate>
<currency>USD</currency>
<date>02.01.2010</date>
<rate>-1.1864</rate>
<currency>EUR</currency>
<date>02.01.2010</date>
<rate>-1.1864</rate>
</rates>:
so far so good... BUT; if I want to get another XML structure
Example 1) -> sorted by currency
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <rates>
<currency>USD
<date>01.01.2010</date>
<rate>-1.1868</rate>
<date>02.01.2010</date>
<rate>-1.1868</rate>
</currency>
<currency>EUR
<date>01.01.2010</date>
<rate>-1.1868</rate>
<date>02.01.2010</date>
<rate>-1.1868</rate>
</currency>
</rates>
Example 2) -> sored by date
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <rates>
<date>01.01.2010</date>
 <currency>USD</currency>
<rate>-1.1868</rate>
 <currency>EUR</currency>
<rate>-1.1868</rate>
<date>02.01.2010</date>
 <currency>USD</currency>
<rate>-1.1868</rate>
 <currency>EUR</currency>
<rate>-1.1868</rate>
</rates>
How can I achieve output example 1+2 using the same internal table as a source? Is this possible? I guess this can be solved within the transformation, right? Any help appreciated.
Best regards
Benno

Thanks for all answers so far. Changing the sequence is not a "problem". What I want to achieve is to change hierarchy of the xml. I'll try to explain again with a simple example:
ITAB (structure):
name; birthday; ***; first name
ITAB (content):
Smith; 01.01.1970; M; Paul
Smith; 01.01.1970; F; Stefanie
Smith; 01.02.1980; F; Barbara
White; 01.02.1980; M; Steve
I want to pass the itab exactly the way it is (ok, sorting is allowed). Question: Can I achieve the following XML's using ST? I guess/hope this can be solved with variables/groups/condition statements within the transformation coding?
Example xml- 1) Sorted/Grouped by Name/***
<person>
 <name>Smith
 <***>M
 <birthday>01.01.1970</birthday><first name>Paul</first name>
 </***>
 <***>F
 <birthday>01.01.1970</birthday><first name>Stefanie</first name>
 <birthday>01.02.1980</birthday><first name>Barbara</first name>
 </***>
 </name>
 <name>White
 <***>M
 <birthday>01.02.1980</birthday><first name>Steve</first name>
 </***>
 </name>
</person>
Exampe xml-2 ) Sorted/Grouped by Birthday (Names only)
<person>
 <birthday>01.01.1970
 <first name>Paul</first name>
 <first name>Stefanie</first name>
 </birthday>
 <birthday>01.02.1980
 <first name>Barbara</first name>
 <first name>Steve</first name>
 </birthday>
</person>

Content Conversion on complex structures

Has anyone gotten content conversion to work on more than just simple parent/child structures? We are able to do
Recordset
--LineA
--LineB
--LineC
etc etc
But we'd like "grandchildren" in our records -
Recordset
--Header01 (1)
DetailA1 (unbounded)
DetailA2 (unbounded)
DetailA3 (unbounded)
DetailB1 (unbounded)
DetailB2 (unbounded)
DetailB3 (unbounded)
We can't figure out how to specify this structure. I have seen several people ask the same question. We currently accomplish it by setting up all the structures to be on the same level, and then in mapping we add context changes, but wondering if we're just missing some step in content conversion setup we could take advantage of.

Hi Amanda,
I have an input file with the following structure
Header 1..unbounded
..Item 1..unbounded
....ItemCond 0..unbounded
....AddFields 0..unbounded
..HeadCond 0..unbounded
..Tender 0..unbounded
I need to map this to an IDOC of the following structure :-
E1WPB01
..E1WPB02
....E1WPB03
....E1WPB04
....E1WXX01
..E1WPB05
..E1WPB06
In order to convert the XML created by file file adapter into a format suitable for mapping to the IDOC structure we are about to start work on a Java program to perform the conversion. Obviously performance is a concern. Are you saying that this can be solved by adding context changes?
Regards
Ian

Is Structure Layout View a code smell?

I have an application that was built by using a double layered architecture. I needed to have a model where I store essential data about actions in this system.
This system must be able to display these actions on screen and needs to be in a Composite type fashion(an action can contain sub-actions, but also can contain other components like buttons, labels, etc.).
The structure model holds data and structure about actions(but not their positioning). The layout model is an observer of the logic model and holds the position and z-order of all components(actions + buttons + labels + etc.). And lastly there is the View that is an observer of the logic model and of the layout model to be able to display all the components(actions, buttons, etc.).
By doing this I've separated an action into three components(structure+layout+view). This separation was necessary because I wanted to have a layer where I make the decision of which component is under the cursor separated from the layer where I make structural decisions(like adding/deleting actions) and separated from the layer where I display all components. Now I have three layers that combined form one unique component.
The problem with this is that a component becomes formed from three distinct layers and it is a little harder to mantain.
Please tell me if there could be a better design for this problem.
Thanks in advance

The following applies mainly to PHP and web pages, but the principles are the same: http://www.phpwact.org/pattern/template_view.
You want a series of template-generating classes. One option in doing so would be an event model:
interface TemplateComponent {
   abstract public void render(final JComponent parent);
class TemplateManager {
   private TemplateComponent header;
   private TemplateComponent body;
   private TemplateComponent footer;
   public TemplateManager(TemplateComponent header, TemplateComponent body, TemplateComponent footer) {
       super();
       this.header = header;
       this.body = body;
       this.footer = footer;
   public void render() {
       JComponent panelHeader;
       JComponent panelBody;
       JComponent panelFooter;
        // Create a series of JComponent and add to your layout
       // This will be the template layout
      header.render(headerPanel);
      body.render(bodyPanel);
      footer.render(footerPanel);
}- Saish

Simple QA --- make structure

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for