Slow hdd performance

Ok I did some research and still can't figure out why writing/reading speed is so slow in practice
hdparm -tT /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing cached reads: 1012 MB in 2.00 seconds = 506.11 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 336 MB in 3.01 seconds = 111.58 MB/sec
With dd I get ~10 MB/s (dd if=/dev/zero of=/test bs=100M count=10)
Internally copy from mc 5-6 MB/s
I did multiple tests
What is going on here?
hdparm -I /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
ATA device, with non-removable media
Model Number: ST31000520AS
Serial Number: 5VX0WRYD
Firmware Revision: CC32
Transport: Serial
Standards:
Used: unknown (minor revision code 0x0029)
Supported: 8 7 6 5
Likely used: 8
Configuration:
Logical max current
cylinders 16383 16383
heads 16 16
sectors/track 63 63
CHS current addressable sectors: 16514064
LBA user addressable sectors: 268435455
LBA48 user addressable sectors: 1953525168
Logical/Physical Sector size: 512 bytes
device size with M = 1024*1024: 953869 MBytes
device size with M = 1000*1000: 1000204 MBytes (1000 GB)
cache/buffer size = unknown
Nominal Media Rotation Rate: 5900
Capabilities:
LBA, IORDY(can be disabled)
Queue depth: 32
Standby timer values: spec'd by Standard, no device specific minimum
R/W multiple sector transfer: Max = 16 Current = 16
Advanced power management level: 192
Recommended acoustic management value: 254, current value: 254
DMA: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5 *udma6
Cycle time: min=120ns recommended=120ns
PIO: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
Cycle time: no flow control=120ns IORDY flow control=120ns
Commands/features:
Enabled Supported:
* SMART feature set
Security Mode feature set
* Power Management feature set
* Write cache
* Look-ahead
* Host Protected Area feature set
* WRITE_BUFFER command
* READ_BUFFER command
* DOWNLOAD_MICROCODE
* Advanced Power Management feature set
Power-Up In Standby feature set
SET_FEATURES required to spinup after power up
SET_MAX security extension
* Automatic Acoustic Management feature set
* 48-bit Address feature set
* Device Configuration Overlay feature set
* Mandatory FLUSH_CACHE
* FLUSH_CACHE_EXT
* SMART error logging
* SMART self-test
* General Purpose Logging feature set
* WRITE_{DMA|MULTIPLE}_FUA_EXT
* 64-bit World wide name
Write-Read-Verify feature set
* WRITE_UNCORRECTABLE_EXT command
* {READ,WRITE}_DMA_EXT_GPL commands
* Segmented DOWNLOAD_MICROCODE
* Gen1 signaling speed (1.5Gb/s)
* Native Command Queueing (NCQ)
* Phy event counters
Device-initiated interface power management
* Software settings preservation
* SMART Command Transport (SCT) feature set
* SCT Long Sector Access (AC1)
* SCT LBA Segment Access (AC2)
* SCT Error Recovery Control (AC3)
* SCT Features Control (AC4)
* SCT Data Tables (AC5)
unknown 206[12] (vendor specific)
Security:
Master password revision code = 65534
supported
not enabled
not locked
frozen
not expired: security count
supported: enhanced erase
188min for SECURITY ERASE UNIT. 188min for ENHANCED SECURITY ERASE UNIT.
Logical Unit WWN Device Identifier: 5000c500250e4711
NAA : 5
IEEE OUI : 000c50
Unique ID : 0250e4711
Checksum: correct
smartctl -a /dev/sda
smartctl 5.42 2011-10-20 r3458 [i686-linux-3.2.13-1-ARCH] (local build)
Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, [url]http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net[/url]
=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Model Family: Seagate Barracuda LP
Device Model: ST31000520AS
Serial Number: 5VX0WRYD
LU WWN Device Id: 5 000c50 0250e4711
Firmware Version: CC32
User Capacity: 1,000,204,886,016 bytes [1,00 TB]
Sector Size: 512 bytes logical/physical
Device is: In smartctl database [for details use: -P show]
ATA Version is: 8
ATA Standard is: ATA-8-ACS revision 4
Local Time is: Fri Mar 30 00:45:54 2012 CEST
SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
SMART support is: Enabled
=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED
General SMART Values:
Offline data collection status: (0x00) Offline data collection activity
was never started.
Auto Offline Data Collection: Disabled.
Self-test execution status: ( 0) The previous self-test routine completed
without error or no self-test has ever
been run.
Total time to complete Offline
data collection: ( 623) seconds.
Offline data collection
capabilities: (0x73) SMART execute Offline immediate.
Auto Offline data collection on/off support.
Suspend Offline collection upon new
command.
No Offline surface scan supported.
Self-test supported.
Conveyance Self-test supported.
Selective Self-test supported.
SMART capabilities: (0x0003) Saves SMART data before entering
power-saving mode.
Supports SMART auto save timer.
Error logging capability: (0x01) Error logging supported.
General Purpose Logging supported.
Short self-test routine
recommended polling time: ( 1) minutes.
Extended self-test routine
recommended polling time: ( 219) minutes.
Conveyance self-test routine
recommended polling time: ( 2) minutes.
SCT capabilities: (0x103f) SCT Status supported.
SCT Error Recovery Control supported.
SCT Feature Control supported.
SCT Data Table supported.
SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 10
Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 119 099 006 Pre-fail Always - 216824470
3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0003 096 096 000 Pre-fail Always - 0
4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0032 100 100 020 Old_age Always - 526
5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 036 Pre-fail Always - 3
7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000f 077 060 030 Pre-fail Always - 58496816
9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 084 084 000 Old_age Always - 14481
10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0013 100 100 097 Pre-fail Always - 0
12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 037 020 Old_age Always - 265
183 Runtime_Bad_Block 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0
184 End-to-End_Error 0x0032 100 100 099 Old_age Always - 0
187 Reported_Uncorrect 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0
188 Command_Timeout 0x0032 100 098 000 Old_age Always - 8590065682
189 High_Fly_Writes 0x003a 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0
190 Airflow_Temperature_Cel 0x0022 070 054 045 Old_age Always - 30 (Min/Max 18/31)
194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022 030 046 000 Old_age Always - 30 (0 16 0 0 0)
195 Hardware_ECC_Recovered 0x001a 039 021 000 Old_age Always - 216824470
197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0
198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0010 100 100 000 Old_age Offline - 0
199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x003e 200 199 000 Old_age Always - 9
240 Head_Flying_Hours 0x0000 100 253 000 Old_age Offline - 152454159153810
241 Total_LBAs_Written 0x0000 100 253 000 Old_age Offline - 3670022033
242 Total_LBAs_Read 0x0000 100 253 000 Old_age Offline - 448914133
SMART Error Log Version: 1
No Errors Logged
SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1
Num Test_Description Status Remaining LifeTime(hours) LBA_of_first_error
# 1 Short offline Completed without error 00% 14007 -
# 2 Extended offline Interrupted (host reset) 00% 13651 -
# 3 Extended offline Aborted by host 90% 8256 -
# 4 Short offline Completed without error 00% 310 -
SMART Selective self-test log data structure revision number 1
SPAN MIN_LBA MAX_LBA CURRENT_TEST_STATUS
1 0 0 Not_testing
2 0 0 Not_testing
3 0 0 Not_testing
4 0 0 Not_testing
5 0 0 Not_testing
Selective self-test flags (0x0):
After scanning selected spans, do NOT read-scan remainder of disk.
If Selective self-test is pending on power-up, resume after 0 minute delay.
cat /etc/fstab
# <file system> <dir> <type> <options> <dump> <pass>
devpts /dev/pts devpts defaults 0 0
shm /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
/dev/sr0 /mnt/cd iso9660 ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0
#/dev/dvd /media/dvd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0
#/dev/fd0 /media/fl auto user,noauto 0 0
UUID=934647db-14d1-4641-820c-e42c0f63c0e5 /boot ext2 defaults 0 2
/dev/mapper/lvm-home /home ext4 defaults,noatime 0 2
/dev/mapper/lvm-root / ext4 defaults,noatime 0 1
/dev/mapper/lvm-swap swap swap defaults 0 0
tmpfs /tmp tmpfs noatime,nodev,nosuid,noexec,size=1536M 0 0
/dev/mapper/data /mnt/data ext4 acl,user_xattr,noatime 0 2
dmesg | grep ata
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 000000001f5d7000 - 000000001f5d9000 (ACPI data)
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 000000001f600000 - 000000001f608000 (ACPI data)
[ 0.000000] Memory: 481496k/515072k available (3766k kernel code, 31608k reserved, 1441k data, 524k init, 0k highmem)
[ 0.000000] .data : 0xc04ad9d5 - 0xc06160c0 (1441 kB)
[ 14.174799] Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 1112k
[ 14.661110] libata version 3.00 loaded.
[ 14.684788] ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m1024@0xffe40000 port 0xffe40100 irq 45
[ 14.684809] ata2: DUMMY
[ 14.684826] ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m1024@0xffe40000 port 0xffe40200 irq 45
[ 14.684842] ata4: DUMMY
[ 14.685022] ata_piix 0000:00:1f.1: version 2.13
[ 14.685081] ata_piix 0000:00:1f.1: PCI INT A -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
[ 14.685243] ata_piix 0000:00:1f.1: setting latency timer to 64
[ 14.699846] scsi4 : ata_piix
[ 14.705173] scsi5 : ata_piix
[ 14.715618] ata5: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x1f0 ctl 0x3f6 bmdma 0xf100 irq 14
[ 14.715642] ata6: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x170 ctl 0x376 bmdma 0xf108 irq 15
[ 15.006827] ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
[ 15.008016] ata1.00: ATA-8: ST31000520AS, CC32, max UDMA/133
[ 15.008034] ata1.00: 1953525168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32)
[ 15.009380] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
[ 15.013441] ata3: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
[ 40.720777] EXT4-fs (dm-1): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
[ 59.246412] EXT4-fs (dm-3): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
[ 59.339759] EXT4-fs (dm-4): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: acl,user_xattr
EDIT: Replaced quote with code - ngoonee
EDIT: Ok, sorry - miskoala
Last edited by miskoala (2012-03-30 08:18:09)

I booted this drive from another computer (Asrock M3A770DE mobo) and works fine, speed with dd was ~100MB/s
I also update bios on my first computer with Intel D945GSEJT (there is selected AHCI mode) still the same transfers with dd (~10Mb/s)
I have no idea what to do with it now
EDIT:
More tests with other hdd (Samsung HD502IJ), dd on mounted NTFS partition:
Intel D945GSEJT booted from Archlinux iso:
hdparm: ~75 MB/s
dd: ~10 MB/s
Intel D945GSEJT booted from Archlinux iso, HDD connected to PCI SATA controller (Promise 378):
hdparm: ~60 MB/s
dd: ~10 MB/s
Asrock M3A770DE booted from Archlinux iso:
hdparm: ~87 MB/s
dd: ~76 MB/s
Asrock M3A770DE booted from Archlinux iso, HDD connected to PCI SATA controller (Promise 378):
hdparm: ~81MB/s
dd: ~76 MB/s
What is broken on D945GSEJT?
Last edited by miskoala (2012-03-30 13:47:23)

Similar Messages

  • Extremely slow HDD performance on Acer 7551

    Has anyone else experienced slow performance on their laptop (I wouldn't think this is specific to the Acer but I suppose its possible) where it takes at least 2 seconds or more for the command to seem to be executed? The login prompt is an obvious first example for me (via the command prompt not a DM) where after I enter my username the Password prompt wont appear for about 2-3 seconds and then even after the password being entered the bash prompt wont appear for another 2-3 seconds.  The HDD light is active/blinking during these pauses too so its like its seeking for something on the other end of the drive.
    Its a standard laptop HDD speed (5400 RPM) but I wouldn't think this would make the hiccups occur.  I never noticed this before in other installations such as Fedora and Ubuntu.
    Is it possible that its my partition schema? It is as follows:
    sda1 --> /boot
    sda2 --> /
    sda3 --> /var
    sda5 --> /swap (logical)
    sda6 --> /home (logical)
    sda7 --> /tmp (logical)
    I have also tried the standard recommended:
    sda1 --> /root
    sda2 --> /var
    sda3 --> /swap
    sda5 --> /home (logical)
    and still the issue remains.  Is it really just my HDD?

    t3kka wrote:Reading around on some other threads I found regarding a slow login to tty I noticed some folks state that a large root partition could be the problem.  My HDD is 500GB with the root, var, swap, and home partitions being ~80GB, ~20GB, ~6GB, and then the remainder as in home (respectively).  Maybe having a large root partition along with the location of the home partition makes the HDD head travel a much further distance which is physically equated to a delay in login and other actions.  With such a large HDD, what would you recommend for partition schemes?
    I have a 640 gb 5400rpm drive, and I've installed arch with only a huge root partition on it in the past, and had no speed issues (currently I have a 40gb root and a ~595gb home and a 5 gig swap).
    Last edited by bwat47 (2012-06-24 20:56:03)

  • Slow HDD performance in XP SP2 with MS-6380

    Hi all,
    I have this HDD throughput problem in XP:
    First, I ran hdd testing utilities within a boot CD and I got:
    35Mb/s, (75Mb/s burst)
    After a clean fresh Windows XP (SP2 integrated) install, I got:
    (with hd_speed and hdtach for windows, first applications that ran after install)
    34Mb/s, 34Mb/s burst ( !?!)
    After installing sound and modem drivers, antivirus and firewall... and a few reboots, I got:
    (with the same testing apps)
    20Mb/s, 20Mb/s burst (!?!)  
    Specs:
    MSI-6380 KT3 (without RAID) KT333 Via chipset
    (all IDE related settings in BIOS are ON)
    AMB 1800+
    1x512 RAM @333
    Maxtor HDD 60Gb ATA133
    Onboard Via Sound
    GeForce 5200XT AGP (running @ 4x, mobo max AGP rate)
    IEEE PCI Card
    Windows XP-SP2
    DMA enabled
    I also work with a NT4 PC and I get:
    (with the same testing apps)
    30Mb/s, 67Mb/s burst
    Specs:
    Mboard with i815E
    intel ide controller
    onboard gfx
    iPentiumIII 933
    2x256 RAM @ 133
    Seagate 20Gb ATA100
    Windows NT4-SP6, DMA enabled
    Can somebody tell me what's wrong with this picture?
    Will 4in1 drivers do any good? How about miniport ide drivers?  
    Can't I get more of a 'better' system???

    Hello again and thanx for your replies..,
    Well, I don't think XP's Service Pack 2 might be the cause of it.
    I was having the same problem with a previous WinXP installation (SP1a, I guess)
    And yes, I defrag everything...
    The interesting thing is, SOMETIMES, I get the 35-37Mb/s with George Breese's hd_speed. And on other times, I get 20-21Mb/s...
    I don't know if it has something to with some services within SP2 (I got some good info at Black Viper's)
    I'll tweak a little more with those and see what I can come up with.
    I'll post results, if possible.
    Btw, I have 2 partitions in XP:
    'drive' C: with 5Gb (NTFS, 8Bytes/cluster) for SO, apps
    'drive' D: with 55Gb (NTFS, 8Bytes/cluster) for media
    See ya!

  • T520 - 42435gg / Sound stutter and slow Graphic performance with Intel Rapid Storage AHCI Driver

    Hi everybody,
    I have serious Problems with my 42435gg
    Any time I install the Intel Storage AHCI Driver (I've tried plenty of different versions) which is suggested by System Update I experience a horrible Sound stutter and slow Graphic performance in Windows 7 64-Bit.
    The funny thing in this case: If the external e-sata port is connected the problems do not occur. If the port is unused again, the stutter begins immediately.
    The only thing I can do is using the Windows internal Storage Driver with which I am not able to use my DVD recorder for example.
    The device was sent to lenovo for hardware testing with no result. It was sent back without any repairing.
    Anybody experience on this?
    Kind regards,
    Daniel

    Did you try the 11.5 RST beta? Load up DPClat and see if DPC conditions are favorable.
    What are you using to check graphics performance?
    W520: i7-2720QM, Q2000M at 1080/688/1376, 21GB RAM, 500GB + 750GB HDD, FHD screen
    X61T: L7500, 3GB RAM, 500GB HDD, XGA screen, Ultrabase
    Y3P: 5Y70, 8GB RAM, 256GB SSD, QHD+ screen

  • SSD + slower HDD

    Despite the abundant discussions about good hard drive configuration for Lightroom (v 4), I am still struggling to understand what to choose when buying my new desktop PC without blowing my budget.
    Assume that processor, RAM, motherboard and all that are up to par, what should I go with in terms of HDD/SSD (under a somewhat limited budget)?
    I want a *quiet* system so using three roaring 10,000 rpm HDDs is no option. If anything I would like to use low power and low noise HDDs (5400 rpm), which could be combined with an SSD. Is this a stupid setup with the HDDs being a bottle neck? For example, is a 128 GB SSD (for Windows 7/64 OS, apps, LR cache) + 1 TB 5400 rpm HDD (for the image files) a good trade-off between performance and noise?
    Jalamaar

    I believe the impact of a green HDD is negligible.
    2012/8/1 Jalamaar <[email protected]>
       Re: SSD + slower HDD
    created by Jalamaar <http://forums.adobe.com/people/Jalamaar> in *Photoshop
    Lightroom* - View the full discussion<http://forums.adobe.com/message/4591485#4591485

  • Slow Effect performance in IE

    hi everyone ,
    I'm using slide effect in this page
    http://www.dostfindik.com.tr/test2
    Effects are working proper in all browsers except ie .
    Does using alpha transparent background png slow down
    performance ?
    thanks.

    check out this:
    http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/09/18/png8-the-clear-winner/

  • Firefox 4 is extremely slow to perform any function on my lap top compared to previous versions. Why? And how do I change this!

    Firefox 4 is extremely slow to perform any function on my lap top compared to previous versions. Why? And how do I change this!

    Firefox 21 and Firefox 22 running on Windows 7 have been reported to take a long time to "wake up" from sleep. I realize hibernation is different than sleep, but... this is the closest match for your description.
    Some users have reported that this problem is resolved in Firefox 23 (currently in beta). Others have had inconsistent luck with minimizing Firefox before letting Windows sleep and other measures.
    Please check out this (very long) thread for more information: [https://support.mozilla.org/questions/961898 browser freezes after resuming from sleep]
    Or jump to the part about Firefox 23: https://support.mozilla.org/questions/961898?page=3#answer-457321
    The fact that this just started recently suggests perhaps it is related to another program or update, but I don't think anyone has confirmed the exact interaction that causes the problem.

  • Kapsel Fiori Client (FC): self-built iOS FC shows very slow UI performance

    Hi Experts,
    I have used KapselSDK to build our own FC using:
    SMP3.0 KapselSDK SP07_PL00
    Cordova 3.6.3
    Xcode 6.2
    OS X 10.10.2 Yosemite
    Enterprise distribution certificate for deplyment
    .ipa for iPhone4S, 5 (tested)
    ipd also inside Airwatch (tested)
    App config:
      SMP proxy is not used.
    The issue:
    We use FC to launch the Fiori Launchpad where there are some Fiori apps. The problem is that after type usr pwd, it took very long time to see the Launchpad UI. Tried the standard FC from Apple Store, and it worked very fast.
    Does anyone have any idea? I see some info about the slow UI performance for Android devices which can be solved using crosswalk, but my understanding is that crosswalk is not for iOS.
    Thanks.
    Dong

    Have you tired testing the same URL through Mobile Safari to see if it is slow also?
    We have had reports of slowness on iOS and we are researching.  The details are iOS uses HTTP pipelining when the connection is slow. This means iOS bundles several requests (2-3 to our observations) together but the ICM does only response to one of them and ignores the others. After a timeout of about 1 minute (transparent to the FLP) the Safari automatically repeats the ignored requests. It may happen that this happens a second time, but not a third time – then the requests are not repeated anymore.  Seems to happen in Mobile Safari Browser more often than Fiori Client and doesn't happen in Mobile Chrome on same device.
    Thanks,
    Kevin Bates
    SAP AGS

  • EXTREMELY SLOW XQUERY PERFORMANCE AND SLOW DOCUMENT INSERTS

    EXTREMELY SLOW XQUERY PERFORMANCE AND SLOW DOCUMENT INSERTS.
    Resolution History
    12-JUN-07 15:01:17 GMT
    ### Complete Problem Description ###
    A test file is being used to do inserts into a schemaless XML DB. The file is inserted and then links are made to 4
    different collection folders under /public. The inserts are pretty slow (about
    15 per second and the file is small)but the xquery doesn't even complete when
    there are 500 documents to query against.
    The same xquery has been tested on a competitors system and it has lightening fast performance there. I know it
    should likewise be fast on Oracle, but I haven't been able to figure out what
    is going on except that I suspect somehow a cartesian product is the result of
    the query on Oracle.
    ### SQLXML, XQUERY, PL/SQL syntax used ###
    Here is the key plsql code that calls the DBMS_XDB procedures:
    CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE "XDB"."RESOURCEARRAY" AS VARRAY(500) OF VARCHAR2(256);
    PROCEDURE AddOrReplaceResource(
    resourceUri VARCHAR2,
    resourceContents SYS.XMLTYPE,
    public_collections in ResourceArray
    ) AS
    b BOOLEAN;
    privateResourceUri path_view.path%TYPE;
    resource_exists EXCEPTION;
    pragma exception_init(resource_exists,-31003);
    BEGIN
    /* Store the document in private folder */
    privateResourceUri := GetPrivateResourceUri(resourceUri);
    BEGIN
    b := dbms_xdb.createResource(privateResourceUri, resourceContents);
    EXCEPTION
    WHEN resource_exists THEN
    DELETE FROM resource_view WHERE equals_path(res, privateResourceUri)=1;
    b := dbms_xdb.createResource(privateResourceUri, resourceContents);
    END;
    /* add a link in /public/<collection-name> for each collection passed in */
    FOR i IN 1 .. public_collections.count LOOP
    BEGIN
    dbms_xdb.link(privateResourceUri,public_collections(i),resourceUri);
    EXCEPTION
    WHEN resource_exists THEN
    dbms_xdb.deleteResource(concat(concat(public_collections(i),'/'),resourceUri));
    dbms_xdb.link(privateResourceUri,public_collections(i),resourceUri);
    END;
    END LOOP;
    COMMIT;
    END;
    FUNCTION GetPrivateResourceUri(
    resourceUri VARCHAR2
    ) RETURN VARCHAR2 AS
    BEGIN
    return concat('/ems/docs/',REGEXP_SUBSTR(resourceUri,'[a-zA-z0-9.-]*$'));
    END;
    ### Info for XML Querying ###
    Here is the XQuery and a sample of the output follows:
    declare namespace c2ns="urn:xmlns:NCC-C2IEDM";
    for $cotEvent in collection("/public")/event
    return
    <cotEntity>
    {$cotEvent}
    {for $d in collection("/public")/c2ns:OpContextMembership[c2ns:Entity/c2ns:EntityIdentifier
    /c2ns:EntityId=xs:string($cotEvent/@uid)]
    return
    $d
    </cotEntity>
    Sample output:
    <cotEntity><event how="m-r" opex="o-" version="2" uid="XXX541113454" type="a-h-G-" stale="2007-03-05T15:36:26.000Z"
    start="2007-03-
    05T15:36:26.000Z" time="2007-03-05T15:36:26.000Z"><point ce="" le="" lat="5.19098483230079" lon="-5.333597827082126"
    hae="0.0"/><de
    tail><track course="26.0" speed="9.26"/></detail></event></cotEntity>

    19-JUN-07 04:34:27 GMT
    UPDATE
    =======
    Hi Arnold,
    you wrote -
    Please use Sun JDK 1.5 java to perform the test case.Right now I have -
    $ which java
    /usr/bin/java
    $ java -version
    java version "1.4.2"
    gcj (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-3)
    sorry as I told you before I am not very knowledgeable in Java. Can you tell me what setting
    s I need to change to make use of Sun JDK 1.5. Please note I am testing on Linux
    . Do I need to test this on a SUN box? Can it not be modify to run on Linux?
    Thanks,
    Rakesh
    STATUS
    =======
    @CUS -- Waiting for requested information

  • Macbook pro getting extremely slow in performance

    hey guys, my mid 2012 macbook pro , i5, 4gb , 500hdd is getting **** slow in performance it takes a whooping 40 seconds to boot . i use FCPX , motion 5, after effects , lightroom on an daily basis for editing media.. somtimes it takes almost 3 mins to copy a 2 Gb of Full hd videos from flash memory. is there anything i can do to imporve my overall performace?

    hey guys, my mid 2012 macbook pro , i5, 4gb , 500hdd is getting **** slow in performance it takes a whooping 40 seconds to boot . i use FCPX , motion 5, after effects , lightroom on an daily basis for editing media.. somtimes it takes almost 3 mins to copy a 2 Gb of Full hd videos from flash memory. is there anything i can do to imporve my overall performace?

  • Does loading too many classes into jvm slow down performance?

    hi all,
    does loading too many classes into jvm will slow down performance. Our application is CPU bound, if we use any framework we need to load all the classes related to that framework in JVM. Does this have any effect on the performance of the JVM.
    thanks and regards,
    akmal

    does loading many classes into jvm slow down performance.It will increase the time it takes for the JVM to load your application.
    Our application is CPU boundThe time it takes the JVM to load your application is not likely to be an issue for you then.

  • Jdbc thin driver bulk binding slow insertion performance problem

    Hello All,
    We have a third party application reporting slow insertion performance, while I traced the session and found out most of elapsed time for one insert execution is sql*net more data from client, it appears bulk binding is being used here because one execution has 200 rows inserted. I am wondering whether this has something to do with their jdbc thin driver(10.1.0.2 version) and our database version 9205. Do you have any similar experience on this, what other possible directions should I explore?
    here is the trace report from 10046 event, I hide table name for privacy reason.
    Besides, I tested bulk binding in PL/SQL to insert 200 rows in one execution, no problem at all. Network folks confirm that network should not be an issue as well, ping time from app server to db server is sub milisecond and they are in the same data center.
    INSERT INTO ...
    values
    (:1, :2, :3, :4, :5, :6, :7, :8, :9, :10, :11, :12, :13, :14, :15, :16, :17,
    :18, :19, :20, :21, :22, :23, :24, :25, :26, :27, :28, :29, :30, :31, :32,
    :33, :34, :35, :36, :37, :38, :39, :40, :41, :42, :43, :44, :45)
    call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
    Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Execute 1 0.02 14.29 1 94 2565 200
    Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    total 2 0.02 14.29 1 94 2565 200
    Misses in library cache during parse: 1
    Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
    Parsing user id: 25
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
    Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
    ---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
    SQL*Net more data from client 28 6.38 14.19
    db file sequential read 1 0.02 0.02
    SQL*Net message to client 1 0.00 0.00
    SQL*Net message from client 1 0.00 0.00
    ********************************************************************************

    I have exactly the same problem, I tried to find out what is going on, changed several JDBC Drivers on AIX, but no hope, I also have ran the process on my laptop which produced a better and faster performance.
    Therefore I made a special solution ( not practical) by creating flat files and defining the data as an external table, the oracle will read the data in those files as they were data inside a table, this gave me very fast insertion into the database, but still I am looking for an answer for your question here. Using Oracle on AIX machine is a normal business process followed by a lot of companies and there must be a solution for this.

  • Jdbc thin driver and bulk binding slow insertion performance

    Hello All,
    We have a third party application reporting slow insertion performance, while I traced the session and found out most of elapsed time for one insert execution is sql*net more data from client, it appears bulk binding is being used here because one execution has 200 rows inserted. I am wondering whether this has something to do with their jdbc thin driver(10.1.0.2 version) and our database version 9205. Do you have any similar experience on this, what other possible directions should I explore?
    here is the trace report from 10046 event, I hide table name for privacy reason.
    Besides, I tested bulk binding in PL/SQL to insert 200 rows in one execution, no problem at all. Network folks confirm that network should not be an issue as well, ping time from app server to db server is sub milisecond and they are in the same data center.
    INSERT INTO ...
    values
    (:1, :2, :3, :4, :5, :6, :7, :8, :9, :10, :11, :12, :13, :14, :15, :16, :17,
    :18, :19, :20, :21, :22, :23, :24, :25, :26, :27, :28, :29, :30, :31, :32,
    :33, :34, :35, :36, :37, :38, :39, :40, :41, :42, :43, :44, :45)
    call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
    Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Execute 1 0.02 14.29 1 94 2565 200
    Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    total 2 0.02 14.29 1 94 2565 200
    Misses in library cache during parse: 1
    Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
    Parsing user id: 25
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
    Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
    ---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
    SQL*Net more data from client 28 6.38 14.19
    db file sequential read 1 0.02 0.02
    SQL*Net message to client 1 0.00 0.00
    SQL*Net message from client 1 0.00 0.00
    ********************************************************************************

    I have exactly the same problem, I tried to find out what is going on, changed several JDBC Drivers on AIX, but no hope, I also have ran the process on my laptop which produced a better and faster performance.
    Therefore I made a special solution ( not practical) by creating flat files and defining the data as an external table, the oracle will read the data in those files as they were data inside a table, this gave me very fast insertion into the database, but still I am looking for an answer for your question here. Using Oracle on AIX machine is a normal business process followed by a lot of companies and there must be a solution for this.

  • Continued SLOW online performance after two Archive & Installs

    Hi.
    I have been living with slow online performance – pages slow to load, movies very slow to load, movies don't play back smoothly, constant buffering – for some 3-4 months before trying to do something about it... (this timeline coincides with a potential Security Update 2008-006 issue discussed here: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1730909&tstart=0 , but I don't have enough savvy to know if that's the problem.)
    Equivalent slow performance in both Safari and Firefox... I've compared the same sites I visit on other peoples workstations, PC and Mac, various ISPs – all of their pages and movies light up and play instantly.
    Tried to research and do as much as I could before coming here, but I don't have great diagnostic skills... here's what I've got so far:
    By late November, I managed to eliminate the ISP (Earthlink) as a cause of the problem... however, due to their direction to change DNS numbers, I can no longer automatically connect online upon booting, but must repeatedly connect via Internet Connect (separate issue?)... via these forums, I've reset the DNS to 208.67.220.220, 208.67.222.222.
    Neither hard drive is even half full.
    I did an initial Disk and Permissions Repair prior to first A&I... they needed repair then, but subsequent verifications check out clean.
    After the first A&I (using the original OS X 10.4 install disk), I downloaded a complete full 10.4.11 update, including all current Security Updates... performance wound up much the same as before.
    After the second A&I, and before any updating, I tested online performance – still slow... this time I downloaded only the Mac OS X 10.4.11 Combined Update from November 07, looking to avoid the 2008-006 Security Update... general browsing speed is slightly improved, but any site with a movie or rich graphics behaves like dial-up, as before... Mail is just ok – not fast, but not problematic.
    Otherwise, the Mac works well enough, but it's never been a real speed-burner, imo... mainstream graphics apps (Adobe CS2, Quark 6)... the only atypical thing I might have is a Wacom graphics tablet (Intuos 3), but it's always worked fine... no games or brand-X playtime software.
    The only other thing I'd be suspicious of is Network Settings, after getting the runaround at Earthlink... but the fact that I can get online at all might rule that out.
    I've been at this for days, and am out of ideas... little help?
    Thanx.

    OK, network settings is the scary stuff that I DO NOT understand...
    BDAqua wrote:
    Make a New location in Network>Location>New, try it without PPoE, just Using DHCP under the TCP/IP tab>IPv4 setting. You can always switch back if it doesn't work.
    I found the PPPoE subpane.
    Made the New location, it seemed to work briefly, then didn't, then I fumbled my way back to prior settings... I'm willing to try it again, BUT...
    What scared me was that after setting New Location, the browser window opened to something called *Internet Configurator*, never seen this before... it asked for my email and password... is this normal?... I've got major privacy and security concerns and DO NOT want to put that password out there if I don't have to.
    Please advise before I do this... thanks.

  • Satellite M30 slow booting, performance sluggish & HDD activity light on most of the time

    Have the above issue with my laptop. It used to run faster than my desktop but performance has degraded. Runs XP SP2 and Norton Internet Security and Norton System Works. No errors show when running Norton Tests. Have reformatted hard disk and reinstalled software but little difference.
    Laptop takes @5 mins to boot. Opening Outlook takes 10 seconds. Hard disk light is on most of time so wondered if hard disk related.
    Any ideas?
    Many thanks.

    Hi,
    Download Hirens Boot CD (if you have a fast internet connection, as the file is 65MB). This CD has quiet a few tests you can use for HDD. HDD regenerator for instance will repair any surface damage on the disks etc. As will a few others. Hope this helps.

Maybe you are looking for