Slow projector creation
I am creating a projector for a large application (85MB). The
creation of the projector is far too slow. This application would
usually take 1hr(max). It is now taking 6-8hrs with my usual
settings and very little changed from the previous version. Any
help?
Kind regards,
Duncan
Xposure Interactive wrote:
> I am creating a projector for a large application
(85MB). The creation of the
> projector is far too slow. This application would
usually take 1hr(max). It is
> now taking 6-8hrs with my usual settings and very little
changed from the
> previous version. Any help?
> Kind regards,
> Duncan
may be too later for this project but, for the next one you
can split it
into several movies. easier to develop/debug/maintain
to solve this one, you can use a stub projector that calls
your big
movie so you'll only need to protect it when finished
Similar Messages
-
Slow user creation when an organization has approvers
Hello everybody,
Just before a month ago, I started having performance problems when I had to deal with user creation, edit and delete. Specially the user creation was extremely slow ( 7 minutes !!! ).
This "little" latency occurs only when I create users in organizations that have approvers. if there are no approvers then there's no latency.
By examining the machine perfomance at the O/S level the machine was idle.
I running idm 7.1 installed in solaris 10 with mysql 4 backened.
Any oppinion why this latency occur ?Login to portal...
Navigate to User Admin -> Identity Management ...
search for your user...and select Account information...
there you will get "Date of Account Creation:"
Alternatively login to :
http://<host>:<port>/webdynpro/dispatcher/sap.com/tcsecumewdumeadmin/UmeAdminApp
If somebody can let us know...how to find "who created the user"...this will be informative for me as well...... -
When creating a new iView in the Content Administration -> Portal Content tab, going from step1 (source type) to step2 (page creation) is very slow. The time to load the step2 page can easily run 30 minutes or more. Normally this occurs on the first time creating an iView after entering the Portal Content tab.
Any ideas on how to speed this up?Hello,
did you find any solution to this problem? Since a few days, we experience the same. I think it has something to do with LDAP, since the only change that happened in the last days is that we "portal-enabled" around 2500 users in our active directory.
I would really appreciate any help with this issue... Thanks!
Regards,
Markus -
Slow table creation after upgrade from 10.2.0.3 to 11.2.0.1 using DBUA
I've recently completed a database upgrade from 10.2.0.3 to 11.2.0.1 using the DBUA.
I've since encountered a slowdown when running a script which drops and recreates a series of ~250 tables. The script normally runs in around 19 seconds. After the upgrade, the script requires ~2 minutes to run.
By chance has anyone encountered something similar?
The problem may be related to the behavior of an "after CREATE on schema" trigger which grants select privileges to a role through the use of a dbms_job call; between 10g and the database that was upgraded from 10G to 11g. Currently researching this angle.
I will be using the following table creation DDL for this abbreviated test case:
create table ALLIANCE (
ALLIANCEID NUMBER(10) not null,
NAME VARCHAR2(40) not null,
CREATION_DATE DATE,
constraint PK_ALLIANCE primary key (ALLIANCEID)
using index
tablespace LIVE_INDEX
tablespace LIVE_DATA;When calling the above DDL, an "after CREATE on schema" trigger is fired which schedules a job to immediately run to grant select privilege to a role for the table which was just created:
create or replace
trigger select_grant
after CREATE on schema
declare
l_str varchar2(255);
l_job number;
begin
if ( ora_dict_obj_type = 'TABLE' ) then
l_str := 'execute immediate "grant select on ' ||
ora_dict_obj_name ||
' to select_role";';
dbms_job.submit( l_job, replace(l_str,'"','''') );
end if;
end;
{code}
Below I've included data on two separate test runs. The first is on the upgraded database and includes optimizer parameters and an abbreviated TKPROF. I've also, included the offending sys generate SQL which is not issued when the same test is run on a 10g environment that has been set up with a similar test case. The 10g test run's TKPROF is also included below.
The version of the database is 11.2.0.1.
These are the parameters relevant to the optimizer for the test run on the upgraded 11g SID:
{code}
SQL> show parameter optimizer
NAME TYPE VALUE
optimizer_capture_sql_plan_baselines boolean FALSE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 2
optimizer_features_enable string 11.2.0.1
optimizer_index_caching integer 0
optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100
optimizer_mode string ALL_ROWS
optimizer_secure_view_merging boolean TRUE
optimizer_use_invisible_indexes boolean FALSE
optimizer_use_pending_statistics boolean FALSE
optimizer_use_sql_plan_baselines boolean TRUE
SQL> show parameter db_file_multi
NAME TYPE VALUE
db_file_multiblock_read_count integer 8
SQL> show parameter db_block_size
NAME TYPE VALUE
db_block_size integer 8192
SQL> show parameter cursor_sharing
NAME TYPE VALUE
cursor_sharing string EXACT
SQL> column sname format a20
SQL> column pname format a20
SQL> column pval2 format a20
SQL> select sname, pname, pval1, pval2 from sys.aux_stats$;
SNAME PNAME PVAL1 PVAL2
SYSSTATS_INFO STATUS COMPLETED
SYSSTATS_INFO DSTART 03-11-2010 16:33
SYSSTATS_INFO DSTOP 03-11-2010 17:03
SYSSTATS_INFO FLAGS 0
SYSSTATS_MAIN CPUSPEEDNW 713.978495
SYSSTATS_MAIN IOSEEKTIM 10
SYSSTATS_MAIN IOTFRSPEED 4096
SYSSTATS_MAIN SREADTIM 1565.746
SYSSTATS_MAIN MREADTIM
SYSSTATS_MAIN CPUSPEED 2310
SYSSTATS_MAIN MBRC
SYSSTATS_MAIN MAXTHR
SYSSTATS_MAIN SLAVETHR
13 rows selected.
{code}
Output from TKPROF on the 11g SID:
{code}
create table ALLIANCE (
ALLIANCEID NUMBER(10) not null,
NAME VARCHAR2(40) not null,
CREATION_DATE DATE,
constraint PK_ALLIANCE primary key (ALLIANCEID)
using index
tablespace LIVE_INDEX
tablespace LIVE_DATA
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 4 0
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 2 0.00 0.00 0 0 4 0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 324
{code}
... large section omitted ...
Here is the performance hit portion of the TKPROF on the 11g SID:
{code}
SQL ID: fsbqktj5vw6n9
Plan Hash: 1443566277
select next_run_date, obj#, run_job, sch_job
from
(select decode(bitand(a.flags, 16384), 0, a.next_run_date,
a.last_enabled_time) next_run_date, a.obj# obj#,
decode(bitand(a.flags, 16384), 0, 0, 1) run_job, a.sch_job sch_job from
(select p.obj# obj#, p.flags flags, p.next_run_date next_run_date,
p.job_status job_status, p.class_oid class_oid, p.last_enabled_time
last_enabled_time, p.instance_id instance_id, 1 sch_job from
sys.scheduler$_job p where bitand(p.job_status, 3) = 1 and
((bitand(p.flags, 134217728 + 268435456) = 0) or
(bitand(p.job_status, 1024) <> 0)) and bitand(p.flags, 4096) = 0 and
p.instance_id is NULL and (p.class_oid is null or (p.class_oid is
not null and p.class_oid in (select b.obj# from sys.scheduler$_class b
where b.affinity is null))) UNION ALL select
q.obj#, q.flags, q.next_run_date, q.job_status, q.class_oid,
q.last_enabled_time, q.instance_id, 1 from sys.scheduler$_lightweight_job
q where bitand(q.job_status, 3) = 1 and ((bitand(q.flags, 134217728 +
268435456) = 0) or (bitand(q.job_status, 1024) <> 0)) and
bitand(q.flags, 4096) = 0 and q.instance_id is NULL and (q.class_oid
is null or (q.class_oid is not null and q.class_oid in (select
c.obj# from sys.scheduler$_class c where
c.affinity is null))) UNION ALL select j.job, 0,
from_tz(cast(j.next_date as timestamp), to_char(systimestamp,'TZH:TZM')
), 1, NULL, from_tz(cast(j.next_date as timestamp),
to_char(systimestamp,'TZH:TZM')), NULL, 0 from sys.job$ j where
(j.field1 is null or j.field1 = 0) and j.this_date is null) a order by
1) where rownum = 1
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 1 0.47 0.47 0 9384 0 1
total 3 0.48 0.48 0 9384 0 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: SYS (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
1 COUNT STOPKEY (cr=9384 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
1 VIEW (cr=9384 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=5344 size=6615380 card=194570)
1 SORT ORDER BY STOPKEY (cr=9384 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=5344 size=11479630 card=194570)
194790 VIEW (cr=9384 pr=0 pw=0 time=537269 us cost=2563 size=11479630 card=194570)
194790 UNION-ALL (cr=9384 pr=0 pw=0 time=439235 us)
231 FILTER (cr=68 pr=0 pw=0 time=920 us)
231 TABLE ACCESS FULL SCHEDULER$_JOB (cr=66 pr=0 pw=0 time=690 us cost=19 size=13157 card=223)
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SCHEDULER$_CLASS (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=1 size=40 card=1)
1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SCHEDULER$_CLASS_PK (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 5056)
0 FILTER (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
0 TABLE ACCESS FULL SCHEDULER$_LIGHTWEIGHT_JOB (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=2 size=95 card=1)
0 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SCHEDULER$_CLASS (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=1 size=40 card=1)
0 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SCHEDULER$_CLASS_PK (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 5056)
194559 TABLE ACCESS FULL JOB$ (cr=9313 pr=0 pw=0 time=167294 us cost=2542 size=2529254 card=194558)
{code}
and the totals at the end of the TKPROF on the 11g SID:
{code}
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL NON-RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 2 0.00 0.00 0 0 4 0
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 3 0.00 0.00 0 0 4 0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Misses in library cache during execute: 1
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 70 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 85 0.01 0.01 0 62 208 37
Fetch 49 0.48 0.49 0 9490 0 35
total 204 0.51 0.51 0 9552 208 72
Misses in library cache during parse: 5
Misses in library cache during execute: 3
35 user SQL statements in session.
53 internal SQL statements in session.
88 SQL statements in session.
Trace file: 11gSID_ora_17721.trc
Trace file compatibility: 11.1.0.7
Sort options: default
1 session in tracefile.
35 user SQL statements in trace file.
53 internal SQL statements in trace file.
88 SQL statements in trace file.
51 unique SQL statements in trace file.
1590 lines in trace file.
18 elapsed seconds in trace file.
{code}
The version of the database is 10.2.0.3.0.
These are the parameters relevant to the optimizer for the test run on the 10g SID:
{code}
SQL> show parameter optimizer
NAME TYPE VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 2
optimizer_features_enable string 10.2.0.3
optimizer_index_caching integer 0
optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100
optimizer_mode string ALL_ROWS
optimizer_secure_view_merging boolean TRUE
SQL> show parameter db_file_multi
NAME TYPE VALUE
db_file_multiblock_read_count integer 8
SQL> show parameter db_block_size
NAME TYPE VALUE
db_block_size integer 8192
SQL> show parameter cursor_sharing
NAME TYPE VALUE
cursor_sharing string EXACT
SQL> column sname format a20
SQL> column pname format a20
SQL> column pval2 format a20
SQL> select sname, pname, pval1, pval2 from sys.aux_stats$;
SNAME PNAME PVAL1 PVAL2
SYSSTATS_INFO STATUS COMPLETED
SYSSTATS_INFO DSTART 09-24-2007 11:09
SYSSTATS_INFO DSTOP 09-24-2007 11:09
SYSSTATS_INFO FLAGS 1
SYSSTATS_MAIN CPUSPEEDNW 2110.16949
SYSSTATS_MAIN IOSEEKTIM 10
SYSSTATS_MAIN IOTFRSPEED 4096
SYSSTATS_MAIN SREADTIM
SYSSTATS_MAIN MREADTIM
SYSSTATS_MAIN CPUSPEED
SYSSTATS_MAIN MBRC
SYSSTATS_MAIN MAXTHR
SYSSTATS_MAIN SLAVETHR
13 rows selected.
{code}
Now for the TKPROF of a mirrored test environment running on a 10G SID:
{code}
create table ALLIANCE (
ALLIANCEID NUMBER(10) not null,
NAME VARCHAR2(40) not null,
CREATION_DATE DATE,
constraint PK_ALLIANCE primary key (ALLIANCEID)
using index
tablespace LIVE_INDEX
tablespace LIVE_DATA
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.01 0 2 16 0
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 2 0.01 0.01 0 2 16 0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 113
{code}
... large section omitted ...
Totals for the TKPROF on the 10g SID:
{code}
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL NON-RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.02 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 2 16 0
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 2 0.00 0.02 0 2 16 0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 65 0.01 0.01 0 1 32 0
Execute 84 0.04 0.09 20 90 272 35
Fetch 88 0.00 0.10 30 281 0 64
total 237 0.07 0.21 50 372 304 99
Misses in library cache during parse: 38
Misses in library cache during execute: 32
10 user SQL statements in session.
76 internal SQL statements in session.
86 SQL statements in session.
Trace file: 10gSID_ora_32003.trc
Trace file compatibility: 10.01.00
Sort options: default
1 session in tracefile.
10 user SQL statements in trace file.
76 internal SQL statements in trace file.
86 SQL statements in trace file.
43 unique SQL statements in trace file.
949 lines in trace file.
0 elapsed seconds in trace file.
{code}
Edited by: user8598842 on Mar 11, 2010 5:08 PMSo while this certainly isn't the most elegant of solutions, and most assuredly isn't in the realm of supported by Oracle...
I've used the DBMS_IJOB.DROP_USER_JOBS('username'); package to remove the 194558 orphaned job entries from the job$ table. Don't ask, I've no clue how they all got there; but I've prepared some evil looks to unleash upon certain developers tomorrow morning.
Not being able to reorganize the JOB$ table to free the now wasted ~67MB of space I've opted to create a new index on the JOB$ table to sidestep the full table scan.
CREATE INDEX SYS.JOB_F1_THIS_NEXT ON SYS.JOB$ (FIELD1, THIS_DATE, NEXT_DATE) TABLESPACE SYSTEM;The next option would be to try to find a way to grant the select privilege to the role without using the aforementioned "after CREATE on schema" trigger and dbms_job call. This method was adopted to cover situations in which a developer manually added a table directly to the database rather than using the provided scripts to recreate their test environment.
I assume that the following quote from the 11gR2 documentation is mistaken, and there is no such beast as "create or replace table" in 11g:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e10592/statements_9003.htm#i2061306
"Dropping a table invalidates dependent objects and removes object privileges on the table. If you want to re-create the table, then you must regrant object privileges on the table, re-create the indexes, integrity constraints, and triggers for the table, and respecify its storage parameters. Truncating and replacing have none of these effects. Therefore, removing rows with the TRUNCATE statement or replacing the table with a *CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE* statement can be more efficient than dropping and re-creating a table." -
I seem to be having a problem with connection times progressively getting
slower as machines are added to the cluster.
For instance, at one machine my login time is ~.5 secs, at two machines
login time has increased to ~1.5 secs, and at three machines in the cluster
login time has increased to ~4.5 secs.
I am running Weblogic 4.5 service pack 7 on Solaris 8. I am currently using
jdk 1.2.006 reference implementation. This behavior seems to occur with
native io on and off.
Thanks
R.D.
How are you doing your lookup?
- prasad
"R.D. Cole" wrote:
> I seem to be having a problem with connection times progressively getting
> slower as machines are added to the cluster.
>
> For instance, at one machine my login time is ~.5 secs, at two machines
> login time has increased to ~1.5 secs, and at three machines in the cluster
> login time has increased to ~4.5 secs.
>
> I am running Weblogic 4.5 service pack 7 on Solaris 8. I am currently using
> jdk 1.2.006 reference implementation. This behavior seems to occur with
> native io on and off.
>
> Thanks
> R.D.
-
IMPORTANT: FM11 & slow PDF creation - Adobe wants examples
Note from Kapil Verma, FM's senior product manager:
Hello Framers,
Hope you are well. I noticed that some users have reported their observations with slow performance when publishing to PDF with FrameMaker 11 as compared to the previous version of FrameMaker. I wanted to let you know that we have not found such issues when doing internal testing and our customers also did not report this during the beta program.
However, we wanted to work with you to iron out any potential issues there may be. So, if you are seeing a performance slowdown on your side, we would like to test some more with your files and investigate the issue you may be facing. It will be great if you can send your sample files (along with any details on steps, your environment etc. which will help reproduce the issue) to [email protected] and cc me ([email protected]). Thanks for your cooperation and we look forward to working with you to resolve any issues there may be.
Thanks,
Kapil Verma
Sr. Product Manager - FrameMaker | FrameMaker Publishing ServerBased on the number of recent complaints about PDF rendering performance, it rather looks like there might be a problem with the newer FM releases. I can't personally say, because we're still on FM7/Unix, and don't use our FM9/Win764 versions for production.
Printing to .ps and Distilling separately should help at least get your FM GUI prompt back sooner, and unless Adobe has broken it, the full Acrobat Pro product can be set to have Distiller "watch" directories for new .ps files, and generate PDFs without any user attention.
It would be interesting to know if the rendering process is multi-threaded to any significant degree. if so, having more cores in your CPU would help.
I'm also wondering if FM11 gets any benefit from installation on Win64.
And at the risk of stimulating conspiracy theories, would using Framemaker Server print any faster? I at least presume that it would free up the workstations during print.
Per-core CPU clocks hit the wall 10 years ago. Per core perf has been creeping up since then, with most of the per-chip gain in the form of more cores. Application coders, however, seem to be assuming that per-core performance is still ramping up at 2x@2yr as a side effect of Moore's Conjecture. -
Slow socket creation at runtime
Im writing a program to send a form via http secure socket to a web sever. My code works, but the problem is, once it executes, it take about 40 seconds for the 1st line of code to complete. Is there anything I can do to speed this up?
Im running j2sdk1.4.0-beta3 (windows98 on PIII 450, 300megs ram, 56k)
public static boolean login() {
try
SSLSocketFactory sslsocketfactory = (SSLSocketFactory)SSLSocketFactory.getDefault();
System.out.println("1");
SSLSocket sslsocket = (SSLSocket)sslsocketfactory.createSocket("blah.blah.com", 443);
System.out.println("sockets created");Problem solved.. if anyone cares, this was my final code
java.security.SecureRandom x = new java.security.SecureRandom();
x.setSeed(1);
SSLContext sc = SSLContext.getInstance("SSL");
sc.init(null,null, x);
SSLSocketFactory sf1 = sc.getSocketFactory();
SSLSocket sslsocket = (SSLSocket)sf1.createSocket("blah.blah.com", 443);
i had a unique situation, i was forced to connect to a secure socket to exchange non secretive info, so security was the least of my worries and speed was most important. Using this, it creates a socket as fast as regular non SSL socket, but it basically lets u connect to a SSL socket with no/very little security. It cut a good 40 sec off the socket creation time.
thanks for yalls help -
Slow computer = creation of slow VM?
I have two virtual machines. Both are
Windows Server 2012 R2 64 bit.
Have the same device settings ( 2GB RAM 1 processor 1 core)
Created using the same iso
I use the first vm for work in college/class and the 2nd one for practice that I made at home. Both machines run at different speeds with the first one being next to flawless(even when run from my home laptop) while the 2nd one being horribly slow. I created my class VM using the college computer which I'd say is definitely more powerful than my laptop at home, and my practice vm was created with my home laptop (i7 dual core 4gb ram). Are VMs significantly different from each other in terms of speed depending on the computer that was used to create them? Should I just clone my class vm which works almost perfectly instead of creating a new VM? I hope to be able to work soon on my server administration work for class.
This is my first post and I'd appreciate any replies.I have two virtual machines. Both are
Windows Server 2012 R2 64 bit.
Have the same device settings ( 2GB RAM 1 processor 1 core)
Created using the same iso
I use the first vm for work in college/class and the 2nd one for practice that I made at home. Both machines run at different speeds with the first one being next to flawless(even when run from my home laptop) while the 2nd one being horribly slow. I created my class VM using the college computer which I'd say is definitely more powerful than my laptop at home, and my practice vm was created with my home laptop (i7 dual core 4gb ram). Are VMs significantly different from each other in terms of speed depending on the computer that was used to create them? Should I just clone my class vm which works almost perfectly instead of creating a new VM? I hope to be able to work soon on my server administration work for class.
This is my first post and I'd appreciate any replies. -
Portal Installed - Slow iView creation etc
Hi,
We have just completed the installation of the production EP 7 (2004s) on a new blade server.
Config
4 Swap Drives of 5GB each
OS - 2003 Server standard edition SP1 on C Drive (12GB)
EP instance installed on a separate netapps drive (40GB)
*4GB RAM
In creating a simple new iView it takes 3-4 minutes.
What could be the reason? Is there a mechanism to improve performance?
In our previous portal implementation (EP 6) the iView creation etc is very fast. (with a hardware configuration inferior to the one specified above)
Any advice would be highly appreciated,
Thanks and Regards,
Antony.Hi,
Nope actually, we are still encountering this problem. But there is a workaround. Say you have created an iview, you can copy such iview and change the relevant parameters later including the ID, name and all other particulars in order to create new iviews rather than creating new iviews altogether through the wizard.
The copying activity takes just a couple of seconds.
Hope this helps..
Antony.
P.S. : Reward points would be appreciated. -
Really, really slow PDF creation
A new development in the last couple days is that Acrobat PDF Printer and Distiller are starting to take a really long time to create PDF files.
Basic system info:
• Win 7 Home Premium
• CS4 Design Premium (w/Acrobat 9 updated to 9.3.2)
• Extensis Suitcase Fusion 2 (with auto font activation enabled)
• 4GB RAM
• 300 GB HD
Here's what I'm experiencing:
Any document printed directly to the Adobe PDF printer is taking roughly 30 minutes to create. It doesn't matter what size the file is I'm printing. For instance, I just typed out the word 'test' in three different fonts (Times New Roman, Verdana and Helvetica LT Std) and tried distilling a PostScript file through Distiller and it took 20 minutes to distill on the Standard preset and then generated the following postscript error (get the same error when printing to Adobe PDF printer):
%%[ Error: typecheck; OffendingCommand: cshow ]%%
Stack:
/T
{--pop-- --pop-- ct_str1 --exch-- 0 --exch-- --put-- ct_str1 --show--
{_ct_na _ct_i --get--} --stopped-- {--pop-- --pop--} {_ct_x _ct_y
--moveto-- 0 --rmoveto--} --ifelse-- /_ct_i _ct_i 1 --add-- --def--
--currentpoint-- /_ct_y --exch-- --def-- /_ct_x --exch-- --def--}
%%[ Flushing: rest of job (to end-of-file) will be ignored ]%%
%%[ Warning: PostScript error. No PDF file produced. ] %%
I do have a lot of fonts on my machine (not actively loaded - use Suitcase Fusion to manage): 8079 OTF, 17333 TTF and 4103 T1.
I can export to PDF just fine from InDesign. Prior to this week, I was experiencing no difficulties. I even went so far to rebuild my entire machine in event I caught some sort of bug that my virus and spyware scanners missed ... no such luck.
Right now I'm thinking it's one of two things: #1 the new Adobe 9.3.2 patch released this week is gunking something up, or #2 the number of fonts I have resident on my machine are causing Distiller to choke. I did add a bunch of new fonts earlier this week, but none are activated.
I do have Distiller set up to look at the folders the native fonts are resident, but have tried without as well with no better a result.
Looking for any ideas you may have.
Thanks in advance.Have a look here, it may help. It addresses possible issues when printing Word 2010 documents with CS4 (no problems) and CS5 (problems).
-
Hi all,
I'm trying to connect to my smtp server with a socket but it takes several minutes to create the socket.
Here is the code to reproduce my problem :
public static void main(String[] args) {
long start,duration;
ProxySelector.setDefault(null);
start = System.currentTimeMillis();
Socket socket = new Socket(Proxy.NO_PROXY);
duration = System.currentTimeMillis() - start;
System.out.println("new Socket en " + duration+ "ms");
// l'adresse IP de la cible
start = System.currentTimeMillis();
InetAddress ipAddr;
try {
ipAddr = InetAddress.getByName(CMain.SMTP_SERVER);
duration = System.currentTimeMillis();
// Socket de la cible
start = System.currentTimeMillis();
InetSocketAddress endPoint = new InetSocketAddress(ipAddr, 25);
duration = System.currentTimeMillis() - start;
System.out.println("endPoint en " + duration+ "ms");
// Socket locale
if (!socket.isBound()) {
start = System.currentTimeMillis();
socket.bind(null);
duration = System.currentTimeMillis() - start;
System.out.println("Bind en "+ duration + "ms");
System.out.println("Est-on connecté? " + socket.isConnected());
// Création de la connexion
start = System.currentTimeMillis();
socket.connect(endPoint);
duration = System.currentTimeMillis() - start;
System.out.println("Connexion à " + CMain.SMTP_SERVER + ": 25 en "+ duration + "ms");
// Properties of the current socket
System.out.println("Socket: " + socket);
socket.close();
} catch (UnknownHostException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (IOException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
The output :
new Socket en 189001ms
endPoint en 0ms
Bind en 0ms
Est-on connecté? false
Connexion à 127.0.0.1 : 25 en 0ms
Socket: Socket[addr=localhost/127.0.0.1,port=25,localport=35106]Java version :
java version "1.6.0_07"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_07-b06)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 10.0-b23, mixed mode)My /etc/hosts file :
127.0.0.1 localhost
XX.XXX.XXX.XXX XXXXX
# The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts
XXXXXX ::1 ip6-localhost ip6-loopback
fe00::0 ip6-localnet
ff00::0 ip6-mcastprefix
ff02::1 ip6-allnodes
ff02::2 ip6-allrouters
ff02::3 ip6-allhostsMy OS is debian 4.0.
When I telnet my smtp server, the connection is immediate.
Thanks you for any helpNo idea of what file I should configure on my server?
I must have made something wrong but I don't know what?
Thanks for any advice -
Slow connection creation to the db
Hi all,
every new connection to an oracle9i server takes about 3000ms?!? when connected, to execute a query, it takes about 10ms-100ms? when executing the connect command (let say from SQLPlus), it takes 3000ms again.
any ideas? any help will be appriciated.
thanks,
GHOZHopefully, this note will help:
fact: MS Windows 2000
fact: Standalone machine (not on a domain)
fact: Oracle Net Services 8.1
fact: Oracle Net Services 9
fact: SQL*Plus
fact: SQLNET.AUTHENTICATION_SERVICES=(NTS)is set in SQLNET.ORA file
symptom: Intial Sql*plus connection to local or remote instance takes up to
15 seconds
symptom: Connections within a running Sql*plus session established
immediately
cause: If SQLNET.AUTHENTICATION_SERVICES=(NTS) is set, the O/S sends out a
NBNS (NetBios Name Services) broadcast for the new connection. Depending on the
needed time of the NBNS query it can take several seconds until the connection
is established.
fix:
Implement one of the following solutions.
1. Change the SQLNET.AUTHENTICATION_SERVICES value to (NONE)
or
2. Add the machine into a domain
or
3. Disable 'NetBios over TCP' on the machine
(Note: You may need additional entries in the hosts file for hostname
resolution.
Check if you are using other services which rely on NetBios. They may not work
after NetBios is disabled)
Best regards
Werner -
I have an external job which runs a shell script which copies a small file from one directory to another.
This script takes 100 ms to run when executed from shell, but takes 2 whole seconds when being executed through the external job.
The job uses a program with two arguments (from_dir, to_dir).
Before I dive into tracing and analyzing the job session, does anyone have experience with this scenario?Hi,
This may be caused by slow process creation time on the OS. If this is the case there may not be much you can do about this if it is just process creation overhead.
Thanks,
Ravi. -
Problem switching between applications
Hi,
Don't know if anyone can shed any light on this...
I am working on a Director project that has to link to and
open Word DOCs. I have a problem whereby when a DOC is opened, the
Mac does not seem to be switching properly into Word. What happens
is: click thumbnail (running handler to open DOC, using Buddy API
xtra); Word starts to open the DOC; DOC window appears in front of
projector Window, but the Mac titlebar seems to 'stick' in the
projector. I can edit the DOC, use keyboard commands to save etc.,
but no menus are visible due to the 'ProjectorName.osx' title bar.
I can switch to Word with Apple-tab, but not by clicking in the
Word window(s).
A few extra notes:
• The projector resizes the screen to 800x600, but even
with this feature disabled the problem persists.
• I have tried creating a projector with the Full
Screen option checked and unchecked, and with the visible title bar
option checked and unchecked - no difference.
• The problem has just arisen; essentially identical
projectors (ie. differences are only in graphics) have run OK.
• We have used a couple of different xtras to open the
files, for reasons unconnected with this issue. However we have
been using BuddyAPI for a while, so I am reasonably sure that the
problem is not related to this.
• Ensuring that unnecessary apps are closed, to ensure
plenty of free memory, makes no difference.
PaulStop press:
It seems the problem is related to the Full Screen option in
projector creation. (While previous full screen projectors based on
the same movie did not show the problem, since the issue came up
non-full screen projectors work OK, and full screen one don't .
Unfortunately I need to use full screen mode as I don't want a
title bar at the top of the screen, and want to use the full
(re-sized to 800x600 screen area. -
Im not sure if i post in right category but ill give it a
try.
How, in simplest way, if at all possible, to include sub-SWF
files in one main swf file ?
I have main file where everything else is driven by
loadMovie. Since my main swf is going to be published as exe, and
there wont be a lot of swf files laying around, it would be great
if all sub-swf files could be inside that exe file.
Is it possible ? If yes, how ?Yes you can, by using some 3rd party projector creation tool,
like:
Zinc,
Swish,
Jugglor,
SWF Studio, and
a
lot more...
Maybe you are looking for
-
I have an iPhone 5 with Sprint. The problem started yesterday when the iOS7 update was available for download. My phone shows that I am connected to our Wi-Fi but Safari pages won't load, apps will not open, and social site's newsfeeds wont update. I
-
Hi, i know this is not new but since i can't find any solution and apple support prefer staying behind the scene, i posted my problem. I have a DVD with all my works files which is burned at the office using PC. Once i was home, i tried to copy the f
-
Use of function and procedures
when we need to use function rather than procedure or viceversa???
-
Setting PS5 Fonts with a VBScript
Just getting started with scripting. Wrote a small VBScript to place a photo's file name as a caption, but cannot set the desired font. The caption's position and wording appear, but it's always in the current PS5 default font, and no error message
-
Asking me to contact customer support when i try to add a debit card. why?
Im a deployed soldier trying to add a card to the billing section in my account. When i try and put the info in it tells me to contact customer support. Is it because Im trying to use my US card on a non-US internet connection?