SM58 "Transaction Recorded"

Hi I am seeing transaction recorded status for trfc's in SM58. I am not able to process them. Please help on how to process them. I see that RFC connection is active.
Thanks.

Hi Pcrao,
Thanks for your reply,
Kindly clarify the following
1. What ABAP program i should use in the Background job. If it is RSARFCSE how will i create the variant for this program.
Also there were some entries in SM58 3 days old entries which are in Transaction recorded. should i delete those entries
Can the old entires cause any issue
regards
Naveen

Similar Messages

  • SM58 Transaction Recorded Very Slow

    Dear Experts,
    I have many tRFC in PI system in SM58 with status transaction recorded. This seems to be because there were an unusual data (file to idoc) from 1 interface that suddenly sends more data than usual. This happens at midnight, since then we have a queue at in SM58 with many  transaction recorded (until tonight).
    Strange things is actually that when I try to execute the LUW (F6), the transaction could be processed successfully, even though sometimes after pressing F6, the processing time could take some time (marked by the loading cursor). When the processing time is long, I just stop the transaction, re-open SM58, then the transaction that was executed before will be in the "executing" status and then I execute LUW for the transaction again and it never takes a long time to execute it.
    Trying to execute LUWs and ticking the recorded status would end up no transactions executed.
    Checking in SMQS for the destination, it is rarely that the actual connection reach the maximum connection. Seeing QRFC resource in SMQS, the Resource Status shows OK.
    Going to SM51 then Server Name > Information > Queue Information, there are no waiting requests.
    Actually the transactions are do processed, it just they are processed very slow and this impact to the business.
    What can I do when this happens? How to really re-process those recorded transactions?
    Could this be because the receiver resources? How to check for this?

    Dear Experts,
    According to this link,
    http://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?original_fqdn=wiki.sdn.sap.com&pageId=145719978
    "Transaction recorded" usually happens when A. processing idocs or B. BW loads.
    A.If it occurs when processing idocs you will see function module "IDOC_INBOUND_ASYNCH" mentioned in SM58.
    Check also that the idocs are being processed in the background and not in the foreground.
    Ensure that background processing is used for ALE communications.
    Report RSEOUT00 (outbound)can be configured to run very specifically for the high volume message types on their system. Schedule regular runs of report RESOUT00 it can be run for
    IDoc Type and\or Partner etc..
    To set to background processing for Outbound idocs do the following:
    -> go to transaction WE20 -> Select Partner Select Outbound Message Type and change the processing method from
    "Transfer IDoc Immedi." to "Collect IDocs".
    Reading that explanations, should the setting of IDoc processing to background (Collect IDocs) is done in PI or the receiver?
    If the IDocs is processed collectively, will it make the sending IDoc process faster from PI to the receiver system? What is the explanation that if the IDoc is processed collectively, it would make the IDoc sending to be faster?
    Why should we use RSOUT00 report when we already have SM58, and we can execute LUWs in SM58?
    Thank you,
    Suwandi C.

  • SM58 "Transaction recorded" status

    If the idoc has reached the destination correctly ,then it should not get displayed in SM58 ,is that correct?
    if yes then,
    what should be done when "Transaction recorded" status is displayed in SM58?

    If the idoc has reached the destination correctly ,then it should not get displayed in SM58 ,is that correct?
    if yes then,
    what should be done when "Transaction recorded" status is displayed in SM58?

  • IDOC's in TRFC ("Transaction recorded") Problem

    Dear Gurus,
    BW System = SAP NetWeaver 7.40 , Sap_Basis = 7.40 - 007 , Database = Hana , 1.00.80.00.391861 , Kernel = 741 , Sup.Pck.Lvl = 31
    ERP System = ERP 6 EHP 4 , Sap_Basis = 701 - 0011 , Database = Oracle , 11.2.0.4.0 , Kernel = 721 , Sup.Pck.Lvl = 401
    The IDOCs we send are sitting in TRFC queues, they are not sent to the target system. I checked all the ALE settings, they are fine. The processing mode is "Immediate".
    When I go to SM58 I will find the entry for the transaction with status "Transaction Recorded". If I select the entry and press F6 (Execute LUW) the IDOC is sent to the target system and the queue becomes empty.
    Also " 530997 - tRFC calls are not processed in transaction SM58" job is scheduled for 2 min period but same result !
    What is the problem ? It should be goes automatically.
    Best Regards

    Dear Kumar,
    We have enough DIALOG WP defined, now we will check 1280898 note and see what happens.
    Best Regards

  • How to find the number of transactions recorded in R/3

    Hi guys,
    I wanted to know the number of all the transactions recorded in R/3 in a time period.
    Points for helping.
    Thanks

    Hi Prasun,
    You can use tcode: STAT
    Regards,
    Ankit

  • Create Document from Data Load and Link to Transaction Record for Long Text

    Hi,
    I have a DBConnect Oracle datasource which contains a large text field.  I would like to build a process that will, as part of the load, create a text file from the content of this large field, upload the file into BW and create the document association with the transaction record.
    Is anyone aware of a HOW-TO to create the BW document entries and upload the files using ABAP?  I thought that I had seen a HOW-TO or instructions approx a year ago, but cannot locate them now.
    Thanks in advance,
    Mel W.

    Hi,
    I hope this is the how to document you were looking for:
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/8046aa90-0201-0010-5e99-962948c83331
    -Vikram

  • Ask for helps and comments for a practicing ADF sample: Entering bank transaction records

    Dear experts:
    I'm redeveloping a practicing ADF sample application based on an exist application system of  my company.
    Here is the goal for this redeveloping:
    What degree of productivity can adf achieve compare to eclipse?
    And hereby is a small example I began from last Monday. some progress has been achieved, but pretty lot of difficulties remained,
    so I post all neccessary informations to this forum, and ask for your kind helps and comments.
    Thank you all in advance!
    Introduction                                                      
    The X company has some bank accounts in different banks, also it’s customers may have more than one bank account in different banks. Transactions between the X company’s bank accounts and it’s new or regular customers’ bank accounts happened heavily in daily. Bank transfer records in paper form will be collected and need to be entered into an in-house Financial System(NX1)  of the X company every day.
    This module will implement the function of Entering Bank transactions records for NX1.
    In future, this Data Entering work for NX1 will be handled by some data exchange interface automatically.
    And the following implementation will be based on ORACLE XE 11g,  Jdev/ADF 12c.
    This link can download  the document for the example, I will upload Database scripts and JDEV application files tonight.
    http://223.4.132.24:8180/BlobUtilServlet?tableName=FILE_TABLE&columnName=BODY&stuffID=020010110000001481&strNO=1&type=downfile&fileName=NXDemo1.doc&directOpen=true
    (The above link is a website of our own. if you meet any difficulty when access it, please let me know: [email protected]).

    Hi, Timo and Frank,
    Thank you all for your kind replies and sound suggestions!
    Now let me talk freely on this thread-and I will limit my topic scope within this Jdev/ADF Space’s theme but maybe in a more broad perspectives. And I will separate topics into different posts to avoid over length of each post. Hope you will have enough patience to read through this some long story!
    Notice: Links in this article will refer to somewhere of OTN itself or a website of our own. There is no security concern on the server. For example:
    http://223.4.132.24:8180/webfavorite.do?method=index&topTag=shou_A&txtTitle=ADF
    (This link is collection of internet links and some abstract for each article on ADF. Not much contents on ADF in Chinese can be found.)
    What you are up to?
    First of all, I need to make some introduction of myself to answer “what you are up to”.
    I come from China, living and working at Shenzhen city which is close to Hong Kong. And now I am running a small software company with 20 employees, our main business is to develop database centered applications which include in-house workflow/information management systems and websites/portals for organizations.
    I have a pretty strong conviction that software technology should emancipate people from routine trivial mental works, just like engines in the industry revolution free people from heavily physical works. So I have a strong inclination for everything to be “automated”.
    For running a company, this “automation” will not only bring the “aesthetics of everything running by itself”, but also will mean more productivity, quality and profits.—After all, no-living stuff is always cheaper than living creatures, let alone to say human beings.
    However, when we software industry tried to automate business fields for our clients, the process of making software itself was still a manpower intensive, less-automation business. and this result a expensive products.
    More than 15 years ago, when I began to work in an IT department of a big organization, I got to know the Oracle Designer/Developer 2000, and have being a diligent FORM/REPORT programmer for more than 4 years. I like the concept and practice of declarative design and automated generation.
    And then more years past, and I left that organization and began to run a software company myself. And during these days, the mainstream technology of software development had been web oriented, Java/J2EE which I had no idea totally. But we have other guys who had expertise on it. So I just leave these works and decisions to them. And it seemed works at the beginning.
    But after several years of business operation of application development for clients, I found this was a difficult-money-earn business. Even if our guys had worked hard, project schedules’ delay, over budget, clients’ complain was easily happened. Sometime we had more projects/contracts than what we can undertake, but we dare not to hire more people. I was confused:
    -Was it a common situation in this field all over the world?
    -What’s the key factor should responsible for?
    -Where to start to improve the situation?
    I know there are many factors should responsible, it’s a complex situation. Find more talented people and give better incentives for them to work hard is one choice—but it’s also a difficult task especially for a small company like ours. So to start from easy and confine solution’s scope is:
    -We have these guys now, what we can do best?
    (To be continued)

  • SM58 (transactional RFC)

    Hi,
    In our source system in SM58 (transactional RFC) i am getting the Status Text:                                                 
    User is locked. Please notify the person responsib
    Please advise how to proceed
    Thanks
    Please search the forum before posting a thread
    Edited by: Pravender on Aug 12, 2011 4:09 PM

    Hi
    Thanks for the update.
    I can execute the TCode SM58 and there i can see all the RFC queus are failed becaus of User Locked

  • Incorrect SIDs on transactional records

    Hello,
    We recently did a system copy of our BW production system to our BW QA system. 
    I then did a delta init and delta load into one of the cubes, without reloading master data first.  After this, I noticed that all of our transactional data is appearing under the wrong Material (0MATERIAL). 
    When I look at the SID on the transactional record, it is different than the data copied over from production.  All the SIDs in the /BI0/XMATERIAL table are the same as those in production.  But the data is appearing under the wrong Material becuase the SID is different on the transactional records.
    Does anyone know why/how this happened, and what we can do to repair it?
    Thanks
    Charla

    Hi Charla,
    First of all the SID's from the two systems in infocube will be different as you have loaded a new data in the transactional cube and also it depends upon the master data objects if present in the cube it will consider there master data also when loading the cube.
    Just activate the master data and it should adjust the SID's.Then run the RSRV for the cube and it will repair the SID's of the cube also.
    Also if you loaded a fresh data in the master data then it will work fine but if you have copied it from production then delete it and reload it again.
    Hope it helps
    Thanks

  • SM58 Transaction   Error

    Hi Everybody,
    All day we are having the problem in the SM58 transaction in PRD environment.
    The message thar appear is :
    Caller       Function Module               Target System Date       Time     Status Text                                          Transaction ID           Host     Tctn Program                                                                               
    CUA_ECP_400  SUSR_USER_RESPONSE            SMDCLI200     14.06.2010 14:47:12 wrong Name or password               0A090A1904F04C166B1F0BD6 ecc01         SAPMSSY1
    Caller       Function Module               Target System Date       Time     Status Text                                          Transaction ID           Host     Tctn Program                                                                               
    CUA_ECP_400  SUSR_USER_RESPONSE            SMDCLI200     14.06.2010 14:47:38 User is locked   0A090A1904F04C166B390BE1 ecc01         SAPMSSY1
    We have a CUA configured in the Solution Manager, i already checked that the user
    CUA_ECP_400 is not locked   in PRD and Solution Manager.
    How can we solve this issue?
    What log can i check?
    Best Regards,
    Fábio Karnik Tchobnian

    Dear
    Double click on the connection SMDCLI200 in SM58 and check the connection test & authorization test.
    The caller entry in SM58 does not equal the user that is used in the actual connection. So most likely you are looking at the wrong user as you mention the user is not locked, the log clearly states the user/pass is incorrect and that after X attempts the user gets locked.
    When the authorization test fails, you will have to check the correctness of the password in the RFC definition and if the user is locked on the target system.
    Kind regards
    Tom

  • Issue with the MIGO transaction recording

    Hello All,
    I am working on the MIGO transaction(Goods receipt purchase order) and i am doing the recording for this transaction but it is not recorded properly, the same screen information is recording twice even though i was given only one entry for that  item.
    what i am doing is i am just entering the document number and then the document date . After entering this header information i am
    entering the quantity in  unit of entry field and then clicking on the distibute qty icon.Later after distributing the quantity i am saving the data.
    This is what i am recording but the same code is repeting twice in the recording. Can anyone suggest what will be the reason.
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    MIGO is use Enjoy transaction so there will be always problem with BDC.
    I will suggest you to use BAPI for same.
    Thanks.
    Dhiraj,

  • I want to delete the transactional record from database table

    Hai,
    I want to delete the transactional data from database table with out using the dialog programming is it there any trancation for this.
    for master data we have the transaction code for delete the records. The t.code is 'OBR2'.
    Plz help in that cse.
    Thanks and regards,
    P.Naganjana Reddy

    Hai,
    Plz help me urgent.
    I am asking i want to delete transactional data from database table without using the dialog programming.
    Thanks and Regards,
    P.Naganjana

  • Issue in PA40 transaction recording

    Hi,
    I recording PA40 transaction. for the infotype  0001 when i recording manually it is showing percentage field there i entered 100. when BDC is over i converted this recording into a report. when i run this report it is giving field percentage  is not exist in the screen MP000100. Why it is not whoing ?
    any body can help me in this?
    Thanks,
    Maheedhar

    Different molga, different ugr, different language, enhancement with sy-batch... there are a lot of reasons

  • J1ID Transaction - Recording - ECC 6.0 Version

    Hi All,
    Can anyone let me know how to record J1ID transaction using SHDB? Im using version ECC 6.0 and it does not allow recording for this transaction J1ID in ECC 6.0
    Thanks,
    Anita

    Hi Anita ,
    better to Go for Diff.Options like BAPI.
    Regards
    Prbahu

  • SM58 Transaction

    Hi BW Gurus,
       I want to explore transaction SM58. SM13 and SMQ1. In one interview they asked abt this transaction. i don't have any SAP R/3 System. Wht we information we can get from this. how can i use these transaction while monitoring DataLoads.
    If any body can provide the information about this. I would be very very Happy.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards,
    Satish.

    Hi Satish,
    The most common reason why I have used this transaction in the past is that when you cancel your load in BW and do not cancel the corresponding R/3 job it will continue to keep pushing/stacking those tRFCs. Few times I cancelled the job in R/3, but later on noticed that the tRFCs were there and the R/3 system was trying to push it to BW. So, when you cancel the R/3 job, make sure there are no pending tRFCs waiting to be transmitted. If there are, you have to cancel those as well.
    Yes, they are available for master and transactional data. In the SM58 tran, under EDIT, you can delete the tRFC, reset status, execute/push it manually or debug the process. One other helpful feature of this transaction is that you can find out the true size of your data being transmitted. Oh, you can also go to SMQ1 from this transaction.
    Abdul

Maybe you are looking for