Small Footprint Router

Does anyone know if Cisco offers a device that is capable of performing layer2/3 services (supports T1 cards) that is in a smaller footprint then say the 2800 series.
Thanks,

I may suggest to get a 1800 rather than a 1700 as it may get end of lifed in near future.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps5853/index.html
Note this router is not rack mountable.

Similar Messages

  • How do I install Tiger with a smaller footprint??

    I seem to run into a problem with re-installing Tiger on my Mac Mini Core Duo 1.66 with a 60GB drive. It says I only have 39.7GB free so how can I install with a smaller footprint without all of the applications that I don't need??

    Hi Dougled, Welcome to Apple's Users Help Users Forums.
    With over 50% free, space is not the cause of your problem. You can safely delete, do a custom install without, unneeded printers and foreign languages. Don't mess with Fonts unless you are sure of yourself.
    A forum search on "install 10.4." will give you lots of suggestions.
    Good Luck, JP

  • What precise requirements must certificates meet for small business router?

    I have just purchased a RV180W small business VPN router and successfully
    set it up as a router and site-to-site VPN gateway.
    Very pleased with progress thus far I then attempted to export and self-sign a
    certificate request carefully following steps in the administration guide.
    On uploading the certificate produced (by Windows (8) makecert.exe) the
    message "No trusted certificate found. Can't upload self certificate." is displayed.
    I had no success despite numerous repetitions with several alternative settings
    in the CSR.
    Brevity of the instructions suggest it should be straightforward and flexible
    enough to meet a wide range of certificate formats. There is no reference to
    any specification.
    Clearly this is not the case! Hence my question: What requirements must a
    certificate (file) meet if it is to be successfully uploaded to a Cisco Small
    Business Router?
    Can I restate an appeal I make to every hardware and software producer I
    have the misfortune of having to deal with: Please do not publish instructions
    and guides that merely state the blindlingly obvious (e.g. Enter your name
    in the box labeled name) and omit all details that actually are important
    and relevant (e.g. Make sure that the name you enter is the same as that you
    entered as the device owner or any other condition required by the software
    that the user cannot be aware of and prevent something from working if not
    met)!
    David Aspinall
    Exertive Systems

    Common features required would be single or dual WAN, VLAN support (at least 4),
    With a minimum of 4 VLANs, the 860 is out of the question as this model can support only 2 VLANs.   The 880 can support up to 8 VLANs.  Now both the 860 and the 880 has a 4-port, FastEthernet, layer-2 switch. The 890 can support up to 12 VLANs and have an 8-port, FastEthernet, layer-2 switch at the back.
    Now all the models mentioned, 860, 880 and 890, can support PoE.  The 860, 880 and 890, can support 4-ports of PoE.
    I've two vital questions for you.  They are:
    1.  Are you planning to integrate your wireless with your router?
    2.  What is your bandwidth?
    If you plan to integrate a wireless access point with your router, you need to be mighty careful with this.  The reason is because of the potential location of the router in the premises.  Most of the time, the router is located in the far corner of a property and inside a metal box/cabinet.  For starters, the location is far (to very far) from the clients so the wireless signal is propagating to no one.  Next, if it's inside a box or a cabinet the metal shell of the cabinet can disrupt the way wireless propagates.
    This is the reason why I mentioned the PoE option.  If the location is similar to what I've described, then it's better to get a router AND WAPs separate.  This way you can move the WAP to wherever your clients might be.
    Next is your bandwidth.  What router to buy depends on what bandwidth you've got. 

  • Does Cisco make a RELIABLE small business router?

    Just as I asked, does Cisco make a RELIABLE small business router?  Common features required would be single or dual WAN, VLAN support (at least 4), multiple SSIDs, some measure of inter-VLAN routing (such as a shared printer in an office) and firewall.  A GUI interface is really a must for small business routers, but everything that has a GUI seems to either be terrible in terms of reliability and firmware, or be crippled by a lack of features (such as the InterVLAN Routing ON/OFF setting!)
    From what I have seen there are several extremely unreliable options available (such as the RV220W & WRVS4400N), but nothing that is stable.  I am familiar with the Cisco 800 series routers and deployed these, but they take quite awhile to configure properly unless you have a template or a vast understanding of the CLI.  The lack of a true GUI and requirement to run a specific version of Java for the SDM to function makes them a pain for a SMALL business enviroment, but good for someone who has an IT department on staff. 
    Any options here, Cisco?  I would love to use your products on these smaller jobs as opposed to the Sonicwall and Watchguard brands, but I keep getting "pushed" back to them by issues with your products.

    Common features required would be single or dual WAN, VLAN support (at least 4),
    With a minimum of 4 VLANs, the 860 is out of the question as this model can support only 2 VLANs.   The 880 can support up to 8 VLANs.  Now both the 860 and the 880 has a 4-port, FastEthernet, layer-2 switch. The 890 can support up to 12 VLANs and have an 8-port, FastEthernet, layer-2 switch at the back.
    Now all the models mentioned, 860, 880 and 890, can support PoE.  The 860, 880 and 890, can support 4-ports of PoE.
    I've two vital questions for you.  They are:
    1.  Are you planning to integrate your wireless with your router?
    2.  What is your bandwidth?
    If you plan to integrate a wireless access point with your router, you need to be mighty careful with this.  The reason is because of the potential location of the router in the premises.  Most of the time, the router is located in the far corner of a property and inside a metal box/cabinet.  For starters, the location is far (to very far) from the clients so the wireless signal is propagating to no one.  Next, if it's inside a box or a cabinet the metal shell of the cabinet can disrupt the way wireless propagates.
    This is the reason why I mentioned the PoE option.  If the location is similar to what I've described, then it's better to get a router AND WAPs separate.  This way you can move the WAP to wherever your clients might be.
    Next is your bandwidth.  What router to buy depends on what bandwidth you've got. 

  • IPv4 private addressing tradeoff: small footprint vs even VLSM length?

    Is minimising one's use of the private address space to avoid unnecesary potential overlap worth the hassle of having un-even VLSM lengths?
    I am designing my first non-trivial IPv4 addressing scheme in the 10.0.0.0/8 range.  Just two small branch offices, but on the access-layer, I'm putting servers, printers, desktops and phones onto separate VLANs.  (In fact, when doing L3 at the access-layer, you can quickly end up with multiple VLANs).
    Now, few of these VLANs are so big that they'll need a /24 all to themselves.  In fact, a /27 for phones and printers will be fine.  I'll give a /24 to desktops because 255.255.255.0 is the only mask which semi-technical users understand.  Maybe a /25 for servers, which gives a bit of room for further subnetting and putting VMs onto their own VLANs. 
    I'll summarise each site over DMVPN as a /21 subnet.  Neat.
    But at each site the routing tables look messy, with the router sporting addresses like 10.9.13.129/27 and there isn't any real pattern between the L3 address and the VLAN number.
    Why don't I just dole out /24's to each VLAN,  After all, I'm hardly going to minimise conflict with private IP addresses chosen by prospective partners by using /20's instead of /21's for each site (right?), and even if they do, NAT can handle all these situations elegantly (right?).
    What about you, would you minimise your footprint in the address space and deal with 'unevenness' in subnet sizes?  Or would you be easier on your eyes now and simply bite the bullet if you had to NAT one day?
    thanks!
    David.
    Message was edited by: David Bullock - tries to get the crux of the question closer to the top of text.

    I chose Alessio's as the 'correct' answer, since it mentioned route summarisation.  But both answers were correct in the sense that they were quite reasonable.
    In the end, I decided to go wtih my varying-length VLSM approach, to keep the address-sprawl at each site confined to a /21 subnet.  I don't find the varying-length VLSM to be much of an nuisance in practice.  I miss out on being able to make the 3rd octet 'line up' with the VLAN, but I feel that's a pretty delicate affair anyhow.  Some person just has to give VLAN100 as a 'best practice' for the Voice VLAN, for example, and you either start working with a /17 at each site (minimally), or abandon your numbering scheme.  You'd really have to go with a /16 for each site to ensure you can number 254 VLANs in this fashion.  And that means for each site that you chose, there's a 1-in-256 chance you'll pick the same second octet as someone else.  With my scheme, there is a 1 in 8192 chance that I'll pick the same address range, so I've decreased the likelyhood of a conflict by a factor of 32.
    At the end of the day though, so long as route summarisation works, all other considerations seem to be a matter of taste.

  • When do WL streams release byte[]. Smaller footprint under JBOSS.

    We have a customer that started having memory issues. When we jprobed, we saw that half the memory usage they were seeing on the client was occupied by the byte[] corresponding to the objects streamed back from the ssb running on the application server. In fact, several calls to different ssbs that return very large amounts of data were responsible for large amounts of data hanging around on the client. I understand that weblogic has to hold onto these data structures to resolve multiple streams of the same object on the server side to the same object on the client. My question is, what controls garbage collection of this data? Under what circumstances will it be released?
    When we ran the same tests under JBOSS the memory footprint was much smaller. If we could understand the BEA mechanism and force the stream to be reset (or do something that indirectly forces the stream to be reset) we would be happy.
    Thoughts?
    Thanks in advance.
    Eric

    Excellent Blog. Thank You
    Small clarification on Step **6) Oracle Home Directory, ...a) Resize the Root Partition**
    Ubuntu 11.10 has Gparted available as a Ubuntu software download, DONT use that while trying the above step, instead download the ISO file from http://sourceforge.net/projects/gparted/files/gparted-live-stable/ gparted-live-0.12.0-5.iso (124.6 MB)
    Burn that ISO file on a Blank DVD, reboot the Ubuntu , during startup select Boot from DVD Option if not already selected. this will take to Boot Menu Options of Gparted Live then select the first menu option, and this allows to do further action such as Re-sizing .
    and once you have chosen and executed step a) . do NOT run step b) also that is "Setup External Storage"
    I hope this minor clarification can avoid some confusion
    Regards
    Madhusudhan Rao
    Edited by: MadhusudhanRao on Mar 24, 2012 11:30 PM

  • Small Office Router RV08/016 or 891 -which appropriate?

    I am not certain this is correct forum, but I doubt sales techs will be able to provide requested info. I am a knowledgable newbie, but not formally trained. After 6 or 7 years, the old Linksys died and am looking to upgrade hardware and inet access. It is a small, professional office, at most 3-5 people (on a seasonal basis). First criteria is, at a minimum, dual WAN access for reliability. We are a ship without a rudder without internet access. Questions:
    1. According to Router Performance table, dated 11/3/2009, the 890 series supports 51.2 Mbps with no services. Is that figure 1. per port in each direction, 2. per port with both directions combined, or 3. is it some combo of both WAN ports.
    1.A. According to testing at SmallNetBuilder, the RV 08 & 016 have a simultaneous throughput of about 150 Mbps. Considering the 890 is about twice as expensive as the RV08/016, can someone help me understand why?
    1.B. I may add FIOS at 25/25 Mbps as a second WAN, so either RVs or 891 should handle the line speed. Am I correct that the 891 is the option which has 2 GbE WAN ports? FIOS tech has said they can run an ethernet line in from the outside box, while the DSL is also ethernet.
    2. I think the 891 has more options to configure the interaction between the 2 WANs, but that very configurability makes me nervous and doubt my technical skills. I really do not mind the CLI, but have no experience with Cisco's OS. Can anyone recommend a good book or is the documentation on the CISCO website usually adequate?
    2.A. I understand the RVs will use either WAN or the survivor if one fails, but that the RVs will not bond the speeds of each WAN so that the throughput to the WAN is the speed of the WAN being used by the RVs. Will the 891 bond the 2 WANS so that total throughput is the combined speed of both WANs?
    2.B. If the answer is yes, will I still have to direct that https access proceed only through one WAN so that recipients on the WEB, such as banks and government agencies, are not confused by the bonding process?
    3. Does the 891 provide more ways to make use of a dual WAN situation? If I do not go with the 891, I will probably buy the RV016 for the multiple WANS, as 3G seems interesting as a backup service.
    3.A. As this location is a home office, does the 891 afford the  option of creating time-based rule sets for the bonding of the WANS so  that during daytime a configuration suitable for the office is used and at night a configuration suitable for speed and family enjoyment is used?
    4. Is it possible to use the USB port as an additional WAN port by attaching a USB 3G modem? I think the answer is no, but maybe I am wrong.
    5. The 891 info page says something about the 891 having a dial-up backup ability. Is that an additional WAN port (RJ45?) in addition to the 2 WAN ports?
    6. I have 2 VOIP lines running over a dedicated DSL line at 3M/768k. Does either the RV or the 890 provide better support for VOIP? I plan on buying a CISCO Series 300 managed switch to plug into the router. Does either router work better with the switch?
    7. Except for the possible multi WAN bonding by the 891 and the VOIP issue, the RVs seem to provide most of what I need for less cost than the 891, but since I have no experience with routers at this level, is someone with experience willing to point out some of the benefits I will get from the 891 which I will not have with the RVs?
    Thank you to anyone who wades through this post (even if you do not respond, though responses are exceedingly appreciated).

    1. According to Router Performance table, dated 11/3/2009, the 890 series supports 51.2 Mbps with no services. Is that figure 1. per port in each direction, 2. per port with both directions combined, or 3. is it some combo of both WAN ports.
    The value of 51.2 Mbps, with CEF enabled, expressed in HALF duplex and no encryption.  Half the value and you'll get the WAN speed expressed in Full duplex OR with encryption.  Half this value further and you'll get the WAN speed expressed in Full Duplex AND with encryption.
    Few things about the 890:
    1.  PoE support with the purchase of a daughterboard and a separate power supply.  Only 4 (out of 8) LAN ports will have PoE support. 
    2.  Supports up to 14 VLANs (including VLAN 1).
    3.  8 Layer 2 FastEthernet ports, 1 GigabitEthernet port and 1 WAN port.
    4.  Supports Zone Based Firewall (ZBW).
    2. I think the 891 has more options to configure the interaction between the 2 WANs, but that very configurability makes me nervous and doubt my technical skills. I really do not mind the CLI, but have no experience with Cisco's OS. Can anyone recommend a good book or is the documentation on the CISCO website usually adequate?
    As long as you are comfortable with configuring the 890 with CLI you can take steps in getting there.  Like what your are doing now, posting your questions in this forum, alot of people can help you with your issues if you provide us with a description of what you are trying to do.
    3. Does the 891 provide more ways to make use of a dual WAN situation? If I do not go with the 891, I will probably buy the RV016 for the multiple WANS, as 3G seems interesting as a backup service.
    I don't think the 890 supports dual WAN connection.  The 890 does not have a 3G upgrade option.
    3.A. As this location is a home office, does the 891 afford the  option of creating time-based rule sets for the bonding of the WANS so  that during daytime a configuration suitable for the office is used and at night a configuration suitable for speed and family enjoyment is used?
    Heck yeah.  You can create a time-based Access Control List (ACL) and attach this to your WAN link.  As long as the time and date are correct, of course.
    4. Is it possible to use the USB port as an additional WAN port by attaching a USB 3G modem? I think the answer is no, but maybe I am wrong.
    The USB port of the 890 is predominantly used for data transfer of files to-and-from the USB stick.  It's not designed as a "LAN/WAN" link.  It's also useful in case the firmware of your router gets corrupted because you can boot the router's IOS from a specially formatted USB stick.

  • Small footprints?

    Cisco sems to be good at 'small carbon footprint', which is all well and good, but...
    I have to nail the switches onto the wall because they no longer fit in the d@mn racks!
    Not every building has a full-depth rack, unfortunately. In older buildings I have to make do with what was put in for phone patching.
    And often, if we don't watch the contractors very carefully, they still sneak in shallow racks today.
    And you can't get a full-depth 8U rack.
    (For smaller locations)
    Having a bunch of 2960 8ports is a mess both in the rack and management wise.
    Is it really that difficult to build shallow-depth switches?
    I'd love 24port or 48port switches that's no deeper than the stone-age 2950 (9.5" ), even if they were 2U instead of 1U...
    Sorry... Just wenting...
    (About to start replacing 3750-24port switches with 2960XR-48ports... and in dire need of a shoehorn... )

    It seemed to me that switches starting being 45-50cm deep when PoE and stackable switches came out.
    You have to think of the features such as stacking, PoE, power stacking, redundant PSU's etc.
    If you want all these features, then you are going to get deeper switches to accommodate bigger PSU's and fans etc for cooling.
    The can't get wider so they will need to get deeper :)

  • Why doesn't Cisco add full IPv6 support to the firmware of the wrvs4400n small business router?

    I own a Cisco wrvs4400n. I love this router but have been unhappy that it is not ipv6 ready. I have been disappointed that Cisco has not developed/introduced a new follow-on router, an advanced version of this router adding AC wireless support and speeds, more wireless signal strength, true dual band as well as the full ipv6 for the web additional to the intranet (as they have finally added in the latest firmware update) - to name a few. What they are offering presently is embarrassingly weak. They seem to be ceding the small business arena but no one else seems to be bringing out a good product for this market either. If they would at least provide support for IPv6 on the web, I could wait until they finally wake up and develop a good follow-on wired/wireless gigabit router.
    Linksys, which they sold off for whatever reason, has been developing some impressive routers by hardware measures, but their firmware does not offer access to it to control and configure it that I would expect in a SBR, like they began in the wrvs4400n. Either I need Cisco to add that ipv6 so I can at least utilise the incipient roll-out of IPv6 from my ISP for time being or finally bring out an exciting new follow-on router with all the controls of that new architecture extending what they offered in the 4400!
    If anyone has information/knowledge about either of these two options, developing another firmware update with full ipv6 or developing and introducing a follow-on router, please inform me about it. I am a 1 to 6 person operation and want to move into the present, at minimum, or, preferably, future. Thank you any one who can enlighten me about this.

    Voskuil67 wrote:
    I have twice requested (paid) tech support for getting BB Desktop Software for Mac to work
    Sorry, I don't think I understand. You have initiated a "paid" per-incident support ticket with RIM, and paid for these services, and you are not getting a call back?
    When you paid for this, you should have been issued a case number or support incident file number. If you have that, you should contact RIM immediately for resolution. If you need a phone number, try 1-877-255-2377
    If the above is not your situation, could you please explain further?
    1. If any post helps you please click the below the post(s) that helped you.
    2. Please resolve your thread by marking the post "Solution?" which solved it for you!
    3. Install free BlackBerry Protect today for backups of contacts and data.
    4. Guide to Unlocking your BlackBerry & Unlock Codes
    Join our BBM Channels (Beta)
    BlackBerry Support Forums Channel
    PIN: C0001B7B4   Display/Scan Bar Code
    Knowledge Base Updates
    PIN: C0005A9AA   Display/Scan Bar Code

  • Small footprint WebAs 7.

    My goal is to test a J2EE 1.3 compliant application against WebAs 7 (not the JEE 5 version). I have downloaded the SAP Netweaver 2004s SR2 (SP9) Developer Workplace. Although this is the "smallest" Java stack available, the footprint is still significant. Following note 739788 and 781882 I have tried to disable all features other than J2EE 1.3.
    Nevertheless, the server still needs 20 mins to start (1GB RAM, 2GHz CPU) and seems to require significant memory. I remember that in the past there was a tiny WebAs 6.40 Java only, without portal. This one had a decent resource consumption. Also the new JEE 5 server comes with a decent footprint, but I need to test vs. J2EE 1.3.
    Is there a "smaller" WebAS 7 (J2EE 1.3, no portal) somewhere? Or any other options to boost startup performance.
    Regards KB

    Hi Klaus,
    There should be an option to skip portal installation in the SAPInst (Usage Types). (Although it may be required for Developer Workplace architecture)
    Regards,
    Mike
    null

  • Small business router suggestion

    Hi,
    We are looking into the possibility of putting in some public wireless access in the public areas of our organisation.
    Its a fairly small building in terms of public access and it needs to span 3 rooms in total.
    We have a spare BT line into the building - ADSL 2+ - and so will utilize that instead of putting them on our network. We would like to run some router based content filtering on the router - but would use open dns if this isn't possible.
    I could do to find a good wireless router that will cover the 3 areas . Its not a large budget project as there isn't going to be very highly utilized.
    We are looking Cisco kit - and have drawn up a few options.
    Initially we were going to go with the 1140's - but these are access points and as per my understanding aren't going to work with the phone line - as it needs to be a wireless router.
    The next area was the Linksys E series (E4200) - they do look really good, and they have the content filtering which we like. Does anyone know what the power and range of the E series is?
    The only issue we might have is its a fairly old building and so some of the walls are pretty thick - one of which is wooden lined.
    It has the 3x3 mimo antennas and so guess it would provide some pretty good range/power but It would be nice if someone might be able to back that up.
    If the hardware is cheap enough then we may be able to setup the routers in repeater mode - however I'm not sure if the home devices can work that way? - I think max would be £300 - but that will be decided when I have some better numbers.
    If anyone has any pointers on this it would be appreciated.
    Thanks

    Hi, My name is Eric Moyers. I am a Network Support Engineer in the Cisco Small Business Support Center. Thank you for using the Cisco Community Post Forums.
    The E4200 is actually one of our consumer products and we do not have alot of info on it here at the small business support center. I would direct you here for more detailed info: http://homesupport.cisco.com/en-us/support/routers/E4200
    Thanks
    Eric Moyers
    Cisco Network Support Engineer
    CCNA, CCNA-Wireless
    1-866-606-1866

  • Can't "hairpin" with RV180 Small Biz Router - how to achieve?

    We have 2 servers in our LAN set up via One-to-One NAT to accept WAN calls to 2 static IP addresses.  This works fine.
    What we cannot do is: access various calendar and web forms on these 2 servers from within our LAN (thought they work fine outside the LAN).  Attempts to call these pages/services from within the LAN directs users to the router's admin login page.
    My understanding is that this model does not support "hairpinning" (essentially leaving the LAN and coming back in via the WAN).
    What is the best way to achieve seamless access regardless of whether the user is within the LAN or outside of it?

    Hi Nathan,
    firmware 1.0.2.6 fixed the issue reported by L2.
    (reported from case 624799947)
    latest is 1.0.3.10
    http://software.cisco.com/download/release.html?mdfid=284005904&softwareid=282465789&release=1.0.1.9
    Hope this helps,
    Dan

  • Installation How-to for minimal/small footprint Adobe Reader & Firefox Plugin

    I need to install Adobe Reader & Firefox Plugin in a small Linux based environment.
    As a proof-of-concept, I downloaded and installed the AdbeRdr9.4.7-1_i486linux_enu.bin
    to an NFS share mounted to the Linux thinclient. That worked -- eg, the plugin was available
    to the browser so the OS will support that build. However, the client does not have much
    writable 'disk' space available and using any type of share (NFS/Samba) is not an option in
    the production environment.
    I need to use the plugin from within Firefox (6.0+) and have to be able to print via CUPS.
    DIsk space available is less than 50Mb, preferrably a lot less!
    Is there a guide available for a mimimal installation?
    Any sugguestions as to what files/directories I have to copy to the local filesystem for
    * an absolute minimum ?
    * a bit more if there's room?
    Suggestions / pointers appreciated..
    Tom

    First - what version of Adobe Reader do you have?
    And now it gets a little bit complicated.  Adobe Reader can be a plugin to Internet Explorer, and it crashes when you try to open an online PDF document.  That is not unknown; it happens sometimes.
    But when you open the standalone Adobe Reader, it also crashes with a plugin error.  This time it must be a plugin to Adobe Reader, not Internet Explorer.
    Furthermore you write "the same plugin error window pops up" - so I can only assume that it is a Reader plugin that crashes, not the IE plugin.
    What I would try in your situation:
    open Control Panel | Add/Remove Programs, and uninstall Adobe Reader;
    open Windows Explorer and navigate to C:\Program Files\Adobe\Reader 9.0\Reader and delete all plugin... folders;
    reinstall Adobe Reader from http://ardownload.adobe.com/pub/adobe/reader/win/9.x/9.3.3/enu/AdbeRdr933_en_US.exe
    The path in the second line above could also be ...\Reader 8.0\... depending on your Reader version.

  • Any Chance on a Smaller Footprint Mac Pro?

    I prefer the Mac Pro to the iMac for upgradability and separation from the Monitor. But the Mac Pro is enormous. I like more of a mid-size case. In my normal setups, I run 3 harddisks and 2 optical drives all of which fit nicely in a midsize case. I don't need all of the server level expansion capabilities and would be willing to sacrifice them for a more compact unit.

    Sorry, but no one outside of Apple knows anything about future product releases. Anything anyone here would post would be pure speculation which isn't allowed here (the Discussions are for technical support on existing products). There are a number of rumor sites which you can read, but as to whether any rumors they report have any validity, your guess will be as good as ours.
    But have you looked inside a Mac Pro? There's really not much room to compact the system without losing the expandability (slots, drive bays, and that second optical drive bay). The MP is only an inch larger than my Dell minitower (not counting the MP's handles), so while it looks huge, it's really not significantly larger than any other full minitower.

  • What is the best photo printer with a small footprint and moderate price

    That "works" with Snow Leopard. I have a Canon i70 for years that only works erratically since upgrading. Wireless would be great or USB for my computer with wireless communication to my daughter laptop mac (she has Leopard and I have Snow Leopard) I am soooo tired of printer problems with my iMac (or my printer per se related to my iMac) Please working certitude is a Must! Thanks very much. d

    What i'm looking for is exactly that: subjectivity, i.e, the specific experiences of Mac users and "their" printer:Snow Leopard marriages. Thus the discussion boards first followed by review research via my myriad Mac bookmarked sites. I'm scared of purchasing based on a magazine, Apple store employee, etc only to find out there are really SL glitches. d

Maybe you are looking for