Snapshot report showing wrong instance on grid control!!!
Hi
On one of the cluster environments, Even though I run snapshot report on instance 2, report shows instance 1. This i happening on one set of cluster environment. Other cluster instances are working fine.
Let me know if you have seen such behavior and fix...
Thanks,
It does not matter how many instances you have running in a RAC cluster ... you have one and only one database.
Define your use of the term "snapshot." We have no idea to what you are referring.
Similar Messages
-
"Invoice History Report "show wrong balance for supplier invoice with USD
Invoice History Report show wrong balance for supplier invoice with USD Currency
After I run this report i see in the last of this report there is difference between the supplier total
USD (Currency ) and the open Balance USD , it is decreased the open balance
for supplier with 2300 USD with out any reasons
bellow is some data copy of the report
======================================================
Supplier Site Total: SAR 34,700.00
Supplier Site Total: USD 39,000.00
Supplier Total: SAR 34,700.00
Supplier Total: USD 39,000.00
Open Balance: SAR 34,700.00
Open Balance: USD 36,700.00
*** End of Report ***
==============================================
please advise me from where can this differenc ( 39000 - 36,700=2300 )COMMING
or it is bug in this report , becuase i compare this report with other report in account payable like
-supplier open balance letter
-invoice register report
-invoice aging report
all this report give me the amount for supplier USD =39000
BUT AGIN FROM WHERE THE SYSTEM DECREASED THE AMOUNT TO 36,700
thanksCan you try running Create Accounting For payments just before you run the Invoice History Report and re-check .
Thanks -
ASM instance in the cluster shows status pending in grid control
All,
I have the ASM instance in separate home and the cluster database in another home .
I am able to see the cluster database up and running in the grid control but somehow cant see the ASM instance .
I will appreciate any pointers .
thanks in advance
PkTry these two things:
1) Deployments=>Refresh Host Configuration=>Select the hostname and then hit on "Refresh Hosts".
If that doesn't work
2) Targets=>Databases=>Select the ASM Instance=>Configure
HTH
Thanks
-Chandra Pabba -
Repository Database shows at wrong version in Grid Control
Hi all,
I have successfully installed Grid Control and have upgraded the repository database to version 10.2.0.3. When I log into sqlplus to check the version number fit shows 10.2.0.3, but when I look at the database in Grid Control it is displaying as 10.2.0.1.
Does anyone have any idea why that would happen? Where does GC get its information from?
Thanks,
PaulaIt is also worth mentioning that when I used DBUA to upgrade the repository database from 10.2.0.1 to 10.2.0.3 the EM config part failed. Having googled this it seems that this is fine for a Grid Control repository database, as it does not have an EM db console element to it anyway and therefore it cannot be upgraded, but I thoguht I best mention that in case it has a bearing on this issue.
thanks,
Paula -
Monitoring a 9.2.0.3 database instance in Grid Control 11gR1
Hi,
we configured EM Grid Control 11gR1 for monitoring some database instances. The monitoring works fine for the versions 9.2.0.1, 10.2.0.4 and 11gR2 , but we cannot configure it for version 9.2.0.3 and version 9.2.0.6.
The main page of 9.2.0.3 and 9.2.0.6 instances reports "Metric Collection Error" and every configuration (with Statspack or without, enable metrics or disable them) gives the same message.
I know that EM 11R1 is certified only for 9.2.0.8 but it seems strange that it works for version 9.2.0.1 (even if most features are disabled) and it don't works for the others 9.2 versions.
Someone has the same issue? Any suggestion ?
Thank you for your help.
AlexHello,
can you verify if the DBSNMP account is accessible (e.g. account is not locked).
Please have a look at Note:340158.1 for some debugging information around this error.
Regards,
Frank -
Linstener showing wrong status in grid console
Listener is showing as unavailable in grid console while it is really up and accepting connections. Any ideas?
Thanks
S~Also check the HOST you have used in the Listener configuration to ensure it matches the host GC is looking at in targets.xml. For instance, if it is looking for servername.domain.com, esnure that the Listener has the same as host instead of the IP Address or another mapping/representation
-
Monitoring of Standby Instance via Grid Control
Hi DBAs,
I have setup the Data Guard single instance to single instance in Oracle 10.2.0.4. Is it possible that if I install the agent on standby database server, can I monitor these server using Grid Control. Also is there any other tool for monitoring of standby databases (database is applying the archives, latency or any other issue) ?
Thanks
-Samar-Hi; Yes u can. Check the following:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b25159/monitor.htm#i1007244
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14230/gui.htm#DGBKR400
You can also use some scripting to monitor your dataguard status.
http://emrebaransel.blogspot.com/2009/07/shell-script-to-check-dataguard-status.html
http://emrebaransel.blogspot.com/2008/08/how-to-query-dataguard-status.html
There are also some 3th party tools for dataguard monitoring & managing purpose. -
Hi Gurus,
When we are generating report in the answers in one column it is showing wrong data from where i have to start for this issue.
Thanks,
RafiPull that column alone,run report, compare the results with your manual query, and also compare the physical query.
if all are good then try to add other column from any other dim and then do the same as above
repeat till you know the cause.
Pls mark if helps -
F.19 report showing wrong values (GR/IR)
Hello,
At my company, they run the MR11 to check for GR/IR variances and then clear these variances using the F.13 transaction. However, when the F.19 transaction is run to analyze the GR/IR clearing account, there are some old PO's belonging to year 2005/2006 that still show up in the report. When these PO's are checked, there is no GR/IR variance.
Could someone please explain the reason for this and if there is any way to remove these entries from the F.19 report?
Thanks in advance,
Rugmani.Hi,
This is the wrong forum for this
Rgds,
Richard -
Why OWB Execution status report showing wrong status ?
Hi,
I created a process flow. It executed successfuly.
In that process flow I used 4 mappings. and the data is updated in 4 tables. In all the tables data updated successfully.
But the execution status is showing that , in one table the records inserted are 0.
I verified in the Runtime Assistant. There it shows correctly.
Why it is showing like that?
Any suggestions are welcome.
Thanks and regards
Gowtham Sen.I've seen this often here. Check the log files on the OWB server and you may see that control center service was force restarted. I have an SR opened with Oracle on this.
The symptoms I've seen are:
1. The mapping reports success
2. Some or all of the levels of the mapping show "*" for the statistics
3. The mapping completion time shows the mapping start time. -
Report Painter report showing wrong values
Hi,
We have a report painter report Y_DN3_47000280 which is Inventory by Plant. We have a plant which is sold out and is not working anymore under the company. But the report is still showing postings and values in tune of 183000...Can you please advise what is wrong and what setting is missing?
Thanks,
Prithwi.Hi Dianne,
Thanks for the details. We checked MBEW table. There's a mismatch of the values between MBEW and Y_DN3_47000280 report. MBEW contains $109.6 and the Y_DN3_47000280 report contains $180333.00 for the plant.
Can you pls tell from where these values are populating. The plant has been closed 3 months back.
Thanks,
Prithwi. -
DSO Analysis Report : Show wrong period
I have created the new Variant for DSO Selection Programme RFDRRE05 to get the DSO for Credit Representative Group for closed period (i.e. now Period one is going, it should consider period value as 12). For this we created and assigned a Variable to be updated from TVARV table.
Surprisingly, when I look a the Variable assigned to the Variant for DSO Selection Programme RFDRRE05, I can see the period value as 12 but when I see the selection Log in DSO Report (T Code F.30) it shows period value as 10.
The report is picking up the variant from INDX table as mentioned below,
IMPORT GENR_LDBPG
GENR_RRSEL
GENR_RREXX
SOPT_RRSEL
SOPT_RRSEL_DYN
SOPT_RREXX
FROM DATABASE RFRR(RR) ID RRCATKY.
IF SY-SUBRC NE 0.
MESSAGE A517.
ENDIF.
Please let me know which program is updating this INDX table.
I would highly appriciate your quick response.
Best regards,
Sanjeev JainDear Ajay,
I've checked the configuration by following details;
1. Period control setting in AFAMP : 002
- Period control: Acquisition : 01 (Pro rata at period start date)
- Period control: Acquisition in the following year : 01 (Pro rata at period start date)
- Period control: Retirement : 02 (Pro rata upto mid-period at period start date)
- Period control : Transfer : 02 (Pro rata upto mid-period at period start date)
2. Period control setting in OAVH
- FV: K4, Period Control : 01 -> Month : 0, Day 0
- FV: K4, Period Control : 02 -> Month : 1, Day 15
3. Changeover method : 05 (Changeover after end of the useful life)
The problem occurred for some asset that acquisition on last year.
Could you please help me to investigate and solve this problem?
Thank you for your suggestion.
VirgoGirl
Edited by: virgogirl on Mar 7, 2011 4:39 AM -
Discoverer report showing wrong output
Hi all
We have made a discoverer report called Generic Employee list which is having 37202 records. But in the front end it is showing only 7001 records.
I have checked that query in toad there i am getting 37202 records and i checked in discoverer desktop there it shows 37202 but when iam exporting it to Excel or CSV file it has only 10054 records.
Its urgent. Kindly advise on the same.
Thanks & Regards
NakshathraHi Nakshathra,
Go to Tools --> Options --> Query Governer, uncheck the Limit Retrived data Query, some times it will set to default 10000 records else manually you can set the limitation.
I hope this helps you.
Cheers,
Naga Suresh. C -
HFM 11.1.1.3 ICP Report showing wrong value for Entity Currency Total
Here is the situation.
There are transactions on a ICP account (Entity Currency) 3.305.080
A journal is posted to the same account with the same POV. 307.205
When I run my ICP report on Entity currency i get the correct figure. 3.305.080
When I rum my ICP report on Entity Currency Total I get a wrong figure 307.205 (Equalt Entity Currency Adjustment) where it should have been 3.612.285
Any clues anybody?There is no limit. In reality there has not been a limit to the volume of data in a single subcube since paging was added in the 4.0 release. Certainly since 64 bit HFM was introduced there really is no limit to the amount of data in a subcube, or the database for that matter.
Now that I've said that, 850,000 records in a single subcube is a lot of data. Prior to 4.0, the development team added an warning message when a subcube exceeded 100,000 records, but this was purely informational. You should still heed the notice. Most applications have a largest-cube size somewhere between 35,000 and 100,000 records (the top entity usually). While I've seen as many as a million records, you may experience performance problems at that point. Make sure you give the database and HFM app servers a lot of memory to handle this.
Since HFM 11.1.2.2 with its configurable dimensions, data can be spread across many more intersections. In your example you have seven custom dimensions, so I can understand how you might have a normal amount of data in each base entity (a few hundred to maybe a couple thousand), but balloon to hundreds of thousands when you get to the top entity. HFM can process a lot of data very quickly, but be careful if you have rules that cycle through all those intersections, such as allocations or maybe cash flow by product.
But there is no hard limit in HFM. -
Oemd_oms_csa_collector showing as down (10GR2 Grid Control)
The oemd_oms_csa_collector target is showing as down.
Yes I know its bug fixed in the next patch. Has anyone attempted to remove the target, edit the targets.xml to stop it showing up?
BarrySee if my response to this posting will help
Database Control always gets "The database status is currently unavailable"
Maybe you are looking for
-
I would like to change my main computer to my laptop from my desktop
I bought a new laptop and I would like to make that computer my main computer for my itunes, but I cannot seem to get it off of my desktop.
-
Open secured adobe pdf documents
How do i open secured adobe pdf documents on a surface touch rt with windows 8?
-
About to purchase new Mac Pro - Need Advice
I am about to purchase a new mac pro and have some questions I am planning to use final cut pro as well as Edius on Boot Camp. I intend to edit footage in HDV from a sony Z1 and also from the new sony - pmw -ex3 which i will be planning to edit in HD
-
CUP 5.3 - Approver Not Found for STD Determinator
All, I am using the standard approver determinator for super user access - Super Access Owner. I have got an SPM Owner defined in the source system table for owners but CUP is returning an error message saying that the Approver is not found. The othe
-
Premiere 7 will not view files that Premiere 4 WOULD view.
I have a canon sd870 IS point and shoot camera and I've been shooting a lot of videos with it that I compile together in PRE4. I just downloaded the trial for PRE7 and it gives me this message when trying to use the same video files: "This type of fi