[SOLVED]package integrity check fails

I recently ran a pacman -Syu so it downloaded all the files I wanted but when it went to install the packages, the integrity check failed at opera, the error I got was: http://pastebin.com/m447d9848
my questions are, what is the problem? how can I fix it? Is the package corrupted, if so how can I delete it? will deleting the package fix it? thank you for your help
Last edited by MONODA (2008-06-24 06:10:34)

Well, it isn't the package integrety that is failing. You just have file conflicts on your system.
Now to fixing them. Most of these are to do with opera9.50. Did you previously install opera 9.50 on your system without using pacman? You should be safe doing a "pacman -Sf opera" to get rid of this. I would do a "pacman -Qo <file>" on a few of those files to check nothing owns them first, just to be really safe. You can do the same thing with shared-mime-info.
The /usr/local/share/man issue is a bit more compllicated. Check what files you have in that directory. I would move them all to a temporary directory, install the filesystem package, then move them back. The filesystem package now symlinks /usr/local/man and /usr/local/share/man

Similar Messages

Database Integrity check failed, how to find an un-corrupted backup for recovery

I got database integrity check task that runs weekly. The job ran March 23rd but failed on March 30th. We have identified that there is a corruption in database and now the task is to restore it from backup (with data loss). We have database backup running
every-night and I need to know how can I find which is the latest backup that's not corrupted.
The MSDN documentation says "RESTORE VERIFYONLY" command does not verify whether the structure of the data contained within the backup set is correct. Does it mean the restore command will not able to detect corruption in the database and I just
need to restore each of the backs starting from the latest to see if integrity check fails after restore ? OR RESTORE VERIFYONLY will confirm if the database is un-corrupted ?

The MSDN documentation says "RESTORE VERIFYONLY" command does not verify whether the structure of the data contained within the backup set is correct. Does it mean the restore command will not able to detect corruption in the database and I just need to
restore each of the backs starting from the latest to see if integrity check fails after restore ? OR RESTORE VERIFYONLY will confirm if the database is un-corrupted ?
As the documentation suggests, RESTORE VERIFYONLY checks the structure of the backup but not the database itself. You'll need to restore the backup to check the database consistency.
Dan Guzman, SQL Server MVP, http://www.dbdelta.com

Integrity check fails on column key

Dear DBA's,
I am getting error while creating encrypted tablespace "ORA-S8342: Integrity check fails on column key"
actually i am trying to work on Wallet,
I created wallet key without auto login option initially and i created the tablespaces, user and tables associated to the tablespace.
after that i dropped the tablespace, user and tables as well as wallet key using Metalink ID 757936.1.
after that i created wallet key using orapki option after I tried to create the tablespace it is giving above error.
kindly help me how to resolve this issue.
I have one doubt that we can create encrypted tablespace only ones for a database instance?
to create one more encrypted tablespace what will be the procedure to remove the previous encrypted tablespace?
Best Regards,
SG

after that i created wallet key using orapki option after I tried to create the tablespace it is giving above error.Please log a SR for this issue.
I have one doubt that we can create encrypted tablespace only ones for a database instance?You can create more than one.
to create one more encrypted tablespace what will be the procedure to remove the previous encrypted tablespace?Drop the encrypted tablespace like dropping any other tablespace -- Use "DROP TABLESPACE <tablespace name> INCLUDING CONTENTS AND DATAFILES;" command.
See this link in addition to Oracle documentation -- http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/11g/TablespaceEncryption_11gR1.php
Thanks,
Hussein

Which exception to be thrown when integrity check fails

hey guys just a scenario for ya.
During the developmen of an API for Global Platform,if an integrity check failure occurs reading a value should an exception be thrown, if not then wat procedure should be followed.
put some light on this

dude,the scenario is as mentioned...
an applet calls an api which inturn returns a value.This value is a critical value of th card.So in the memory this value will be stored along with its compliment.
In the api,first of all it has to be checked whether the value and it compliment when 'AND ed' gives zero,this is to ensure that memory is corrupted.So if this check fails in the API what shoukd be done.
Should and exception be thrown or an error status word be return to the terminl

How to solve package error checks

Hi ,
did any body know about the package checks. i am getting some package error checks in extended program check.
Object PROG /SPA/CREATE_TPM_SERVICE has insufficient authorization to use objects
DTEL GUID_32 from package SABP
/SPA/CREATE_TPM_SERVICE in package /SPA/SALES_PLANNING
GUID_32 in package SABP
Package /SPA/SALES_PLANNING does not have sufficient use access
(The message cannot be hidden using pseudo-comment "#EC .., bzw. durch SET
EXTENDED CHECK OFF/ON)
Best regards
Koti

Hi,
did you solve that package error in the meantime? If not, please let me know the development system and I will have a look.
Regards,
Stefan

11g installer on CentOS 4 - package version checks failing

I'm trying to install 11g on CentOS 4.4 (in a Parallels VM, on an iMac) and the installer is claiming that some of the OS packages are missing or at the wrong version. However when I check them on the command line with "yum info" they seem fine.
For example, from the installer log:
Checking for libaio-0.3.105; Not found. Failed <<<<
Checking for libaio-devel-0.3.105; Not found. Failed <<<<
Checking for libstdc++-3.4.5; found libstdc++-3.4.6-8-i386. Passed
Checking for elfutils-libelf-devel-0.97; Not found. Failed <<<<
Checking for sysstat-5.0.5; Not found. Failed <<<< Checking for libgcc-3.4.5; found libgcc-3.4.6-8-i386. Passed
Checking for libstdc++-devel-3.4.5; found libstdc++-devel-3.4.6-8-i386. Passed
Checking for unixODBC-2.2.11; Not found. Failed <<<<
Checking for unixODBC-devel-2.2.11; Not found. Failed <<<<
Check complete. The overall result of this check is: Failed <<<<
However, yum info libaio gives:
Setting up repositories
Reading repository metadata in from local files
Available Packages
Name   : libaio
Arch   : i386
Version: 0.3.105
Release: 2
Size   : 18 k
Repo   : base
Summary: Linux-native asynchronous I/O access libraryWhat is the installer checking that is giving different results, and how can I convince it I actually have the required version? Note that it is not failing all packages, for example it is happy with libstdc++ and "yum info libstdc++" gives version 3.4.6 release 8, exactly as the Oracle installer reported.

William,
I believe yum info <package name> will tell you about matching packages available in repositories yum is configured to talk to, not whether it's installed?
The following will tell you what version of libaio is installed (if any):
# rpm -q libaioSergio

Installed Package Integrity Checker

I finally got around to learning python...great language btw, and I decided to try a small project that took me a half a day, but probably would have taken some guru 5 minutes flat, as a test program. What this does is parse /var/lib/pacman/local/*/files and check to make sure that everything it finds listed still exists on your system, it outputs anything that it didnt manage to read, and the package that owns it.
Please try it out and send comments/tips/criticisms/etc..
http://neotuli.dyndns.org/arch/pkginteg.py
Thanks

Looks alright to me... you probably didn't have to use os.walk though. An os.listdir would have been just as good (you already know that there will be a files file in each directory).
Alternately, you could look at the pacman module that's included with namcap. It can load package information from places like /var/lib/pacman/local.

Designer gets closed when integrity check is run - OLAP Universe (MSSAS)

Hi All,
I have an OLAP universe (Designer XI 3.1). The source cube has been built and deployed using MS SQL Server Analysis Studio 2005. When i try to run an integrity check to parse objects the designer closes down automatically. This issue is only with OLAP universes, other universes work just fine. In fact I remember the same universe was working perfectly well a few months back. Recently I had to re-install BOXI 3.1 due to some issues with the registry files but after the re-installation this is the first time I am working on an OLAP universe.
I checked MDA.log file and found the following error logged there multiple times (each time i ran the integrity check):
Failed to locate the LogFormat settings in the registry. In this case, the LogFormat will use the default format.
I searched the net for a possible solution but couldn't find anything useful. Has anybody of you faced a similar problem? Is this a registry issue?
Please help!!
Thanks in advance!!

Hi Sonia,
How did you solve the problem? We are also facing problems with Hierarchies in the BW Universe. Please share the knowledge, so we (someone else) can also be beneficial.
Regards,
Bhavesh

ITunes database integrity check?

In iTunes I have a few ! that have appeared in the first column indicating iTunes can't find the file. So far I have found three folders (albums) that are missing from my music library disc and I don't understand how or when they dissappeared. I haven't found any individual missing files yet, just missing whole folders. It appears iTunes doesn't update the ! indicator until it has some reason to actually go open the file. Is there a way to automate this? So far I've been looking at each song with Command-I to check the Where info under Summary, or selecting the first song of an album and using Command-R to view the songs in finder. This is going to take a long time with nearly 8000 songs in my library. I'm trying to get an handle on the extent of the problem. I am careful to only use iTunes to manage the library (I don't move files around with finder). My library is on an external Firewire drive. Ideally, I would like there to be an "iTunes database integrity check" command.

The MSDN documentation says "RESTORE VERIFYONLY" command does not verify whether the structure of the data contained within the backup set is correct. Does it mean the restore command will not able to detect corruption in the database and I just need to
restore each of the backs starting from the latest to see if integrity check fails after restore ? OR RESTORE VERIFYONLY will confirm if the database is un-corrupted ?
As the documentation suggests, RESTORE VERIFYONLY checks the structure of the backup but not the database itself. You'll need to restore the backup to check the database consistency.
Dan Guzman, SQL Server MVP, http://www.dbdelta.com

Oes11sp2 yast online updates - validation check failed

Did all online updates September 29th for my sles11sp3 oes11sp2 servers and restarted servers. Went to check today and I'm getting a validation check failed error.
Validation check failed
File repomd.xml from repository sles11-sp3-updates.... is signed but the integrity check failed.

I'm getting the same thing on multiple servers, will try again later!

Oracle 11g RAC on Red Hat EL 4 x86_64 check failed for glibc-2.3.4-2.19

Hi , I had a Red Hat EL 4 linux with FULL installion, so all the packages are installed auto.
when I check the glibc with RPM, I got :
rpm -q --queryformat "%{NAME}-%{VERSION}.%{RELEASE}.%{ARCH}\n" glibc
glibc-2.3.4.2.41.i686
glibc-2.3.4.2.41.x86_64
It looks the 32 bit and 64 bit glibc are all installed.
but when I run cluvfy to check RAC installion , I got :
Check: Package existence for "glibc-2.3.4-2.19"
Node Name Status Comment
wcmrac2 missing failed
wcmrac1 missing failed
Result: Package existence check failed for "glibc-2.3.4-2.19". －－－－－32 bit check failed ？？
Check: Package existence for "glibc-2.3.4-2.19"
Node Name Status Comment
wcmrac2 glibc-2.3.4-2.41 passed
wcmrac1 glibc-2.3.4-2.41 passed
Result: Package existence check passed for "glibc-2.3.4-2.19".－－－－64 bit check passed ？？
why does this ?

Did you check the compatibility of Oracle Database 11g with RedHat 4 in the compatibility matrix or the installation docs?

Checking package integrity... corrupted [ SOLVED ]

I got this error,
checking package integrity...
error: archive flac-1.1.4-1.pkg.tar.gz is corrupted
archive flac-1.1.4-1.pkg.tar.gz is corrupted
prompt#
What can I do ?
I got this while running pacman -Syu Can I do pacman -Syu "minus flac" ?
Last edited by go4it (2007-03-28 20:09:00)

lucke wrote:rm /var/cache/pacman/pkg/flac-1.1.4-1.pkg.tar.gz and run pacman again.
Good to remember should I have this problem again
Many thanks !

Pacman "hangs" at checking package integrity(Solved corrupt download)

Pacman -Syu downloaded the following packages but hangs at "checking package integrity"
[root@n6re ~]# pacman -Syu
:: Synchronizing package databases...
core is up to date
extra is up to date
community is up to date
:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
Targets (20): apr-1.3.9-1 db-4.8.24-1 apr-util-1.3.9-3 python-2.6.3-1
dbus-python-0.83.0-2.1 gavl-1.1.1-2 perl-5.10.1-3
groff-1.20.1-3 heimdal-1.2.1-7 libical-0.44-1 libmtp-0.3.7-1.1
libsasl-2.1.23-2 pam-1.0.4-2 qt-4.5.3-2 rdesktop-1.6.0-3
redland-1.0.9-4 soprano-2.3.1-1 subversion-1.6.5-5
system-config-printer-common-1.1.13-1 vorbis-tools-1.2.0-4
Total Download Size: 0.00 MB
Total Installed Size: 286.37 MB
Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y
checking package integrity...
This printout resulted after canceling the download and restarting pacman -Syu. Thus the same failure occurs after the original download failure of the same type.
What causes this failure mode?
Last edited by lilsirecho (2009-10-04 22:19:44)

whoops wrote:
Mine took a whole 10 minutes to spit out...:
checking package integrity...
:: File go-openoffice-3.1.1.3-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz is corrupted. Do you want to delete it? [Y/n]
... today.
I guess, this shouldn't happen... but then again, I guess, I really really shouldn't have the machine hibernate while pacman is downloading .
No it should not happen, this is the same bug.
I guess either when you suspended or resumed, your network was down at some point, so libfetch returned -1 and triggered the infamous pacman bug.
See http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php? … 92#p633292

[Solved (initscripts-splash plroblem)] Filesystem check failed

Hello, my arch i686 sudently doesn't boot.
At system start, after loading kernel, the boot process stops and says "FILESYSTEM CHECK FAILED" give root password for maintenance or control+D for restart.
My root partition (dev/sda2) is reiserfs formated, and arch updated this week.
After reading a while I booted with Arch install CD and tried the follwing:
fsck.reiserfs --check /dev/sda2
fsck.reiserfs --fix-fixable /dev/sda2
fsck.reiserfs --rebuild-sb /dev/sda2
fsck.reiserfs --clean-attributes /dev/sda2
But no errors were found or fixed, so I can't boot arch yet.
Are there any other way to fix the filesystem?
can filesystem check be skipped?
please help
Last edited by juan_sck (2008-10-13 11:09:17)

Mektub wrote:
Could it be that it is anoter partition that is giving trouble ? Ot do you only have /dev/sda2 ?
Or start in sinle-user. At the grub boot menu, select the option that lets you edit the kernel parameters.
Add either a '1' or 'single' to the end of the kernel parameters, then continue booting up.
Mektub
of course I know where I installled Arch.
pointone wrote:There should be a more descriptive error message above where it says "filesystem check failed" describing WHY the fsck failed.
No, just system check failed. Even more, my filesystem was perfectly, it was a problem with initscripts-splash
iDeJ wrote:
i had a similar problem after the last pacman -Syu, basicly the bootsplash-initscripts are not compatible with latest udev
maybe it helps
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=56604
I don't think installing a year old initscripts package would solve it, but you were very helpful.
Finally I could solve it with the recovery console:
After the error message I typed root password to log in, then remounted root partition for r/w:
mount -n -o remount,rw /
Finally I had to remove the package initscripts-splash and install initscripts form core.
ifconfig eth0 up
dhcpcd eth0
pacman -Syu
pacman -Rs initscripts-splash
pacman -S initscripts
exit
**You should make a backup of rc.conf before installing initscripts, because installing initscrips will overwrite it (and a few other files i hadn't modified), and pacman was supoussed to back it up, but it didn't
thanks for your help.

Meaning of this error (ISE 1.2 on SNS-3415): HARDWARE RNG INTEGRITY CHECK HAS FAILED!

Hi. We recently purchased an ISE 1.2 appliance (SNS-3415 hardware). It installed fine, but I am unable to access the GUI. When I login to the box and run the following command on the CLI
ISE-12-NS-SD-2/admin# show application status ise
I see the following output:
ISE Database listener is running, PID: 7737
ISE Database is running, number of processes: 38
ISE Application Server process is not running.
ISE Profiler DB is running, PID: 9090
ISE M&T Session Database is running, PID: 8959
ISE M&T Log Collector is running, PID: 9294
ISE M&T Log Processor is running, PID: 9376
% ERROR: ISE SERVICES HAVE BEEN DISABLED BECAUSE
% HARDWARE RNG INTEGRITY CHECK HAS FAILED!
Can anyone help me? What can I do to ensure that the hardware RNG integrity check succeeds. Is it a license issue? Is it faulty hardware? Please advise. I would be very greatful.
Thanks in advance.

I worked with a TAC engineer on this and he said one other customer had this issue and the only recourse was reimaging the appliance with the ISE 1.2 ISO image.
I did reboot, restarted services, reset to factory default and none of that worked. It is possible that the issue happened because during setup of the appliance I didn't have network connectivity and went ahead with the setup and configuration of the ISE application anyway. I later had network connectivity but by that time ISE manifested this fault.
Reimaging and ensuring network connectivity during setup the next time around fixed the problem.

[SOLVED]package integrity check fails

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for