[solved] Pacman believes nothing is installed

Hello,
It's been a week or so I am not getting any update on my laptop when trying to run "pacman -Syu"
So I started to check if the mirrors I used were up to date, I changed the according to some listed as up to date in https://www.archlinux.org/mirrors/status/ .
Nothing changed, "pacman -Syyu" still told me there was no update.
Then... I discovered that nothing is installed, according to pacman. Pacman itself is not considered as install. And if I try to install it (with itself), it's listing me all the dependencies I am missing, ie, everything.
But for sure, I have some packages installed. So I didn't try to reinstall anything yet.
I am wondering if there is any way to help pacman to see the light and "rediscover" the installed packages without reinstalling them ?
Thank you !
Last edited by ekryyn (2015-03-18 17:10:50)

$ uname -a
Linux Tomato 3.18.6-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Feb 7 08:44:05 CET 2015 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ pacman -Qq | wc -l
0
$ du -sh /var/lib/pacman/local
72K /var/lib/pacman/local
The wiki indeed seems to cover my case, I couldn't make any google query to point me to this :
"pacman does not recognize installed packages", wiki is the first result, but I couldn't follow the track to the solution. Now that I know it needs a database recovery, my next search will be more efficient, better than "pacman is drunk"
I am following the wiki steps right now, thank you very much !
I'll mark it as resolved when finished (hopefully it will be resolved)
Last edited by ekryyn (2015-03-18 16:55:42)

Similar Messages

  • [Solved] pacman-color failed to install missing dependencies

    Just upgraded my AUR packages and I get this error:
    :: Starting AUR upgrade...
    :: perl-class-load-xs 0.04-2 -> 0.06-1
    AUR Targets (1): perl-class-load-xs
    Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y
    :: Edit perl-class-load-xs PKGBUILD? [Y/n] n
    :: Building perl-class-load-xs package...
    ==> Making package: perl-class-load-xs 0.06-1 (Sat Nov 3 09:14:38 PDT 2012)
    ==> Checking runtime dependencies...
    ==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
    ==> Installing missing dependencies...
    error: target not found: perl-test-without-module
    ==> ERROR: 'pacman-color' failed to install missing dependencies.
    :: perl-class-load-xs cleaned
    Any help appreciated.
    Last edited by lagagnon (2012-11-04 03:07:33)

    perl-test-without-module is in the AUR.
    edit: build the package yourself in makepkg or use an aur helper.
    Last edited by SS4 (2012-11-03 16:41:55)

  • [SOLVED] pacman keeps trying to install 32bit packages on my 64bit OS

    Hi,
    I have just installed Arch linux first time (ISO as of 01 Nov). My OS should be 64bit (my hw is 64bit) but pacman fails on any package I try to install.
    Example
    $ pacman -S grub
    error: failed to prepare transaction (package architecture is not valid)
    :: package grub-1:2.02.beta2-5-i686 does not have a valid architecture
    So it tries to install 32bit package (and fails), but why?
    My system:
    $ uname -a
    Linux archiso 3.17.1-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Oct 15 15:04:35 CEST 2014 x86_64 GNU/Linux
    I checked /etc/pacman.conf:
    Architecture = auto
    and /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist (the first three entries are shown; all of the mirrors have the same format):
    ## Score: 0.3, Germany
    Server = http://mirror.gnomus.de/$repo/os/$arch
    ## Score: 0.3, France
    Server = http://archlinux.polymorf.fr/$repo/os/$arch
    ## Score: 0.5, Netherlands
    Server = http://ftp.nluug.nl/os/Linux/distr/archlinux/$repo/os/$arch
    And it is not only grub, it is any package (e.g. gamin, lxde)
    Last edited by arthurdent84 (2014-12-03 14:59:34)

    Spider.007 wrote:What does pacman --debug tell you about 'arch:' (which is de detected architecture)?
    debug: config: arch: x86_64
    and of course the mirrors added look like this:
    debug: adding new server URL to database 'core': http://mirror.gnomus.de/core/os/x86_64

  • [solved] pacman -Syu wants to install older version of a package

    Hi,
    This is rather a nuissance than an actual problem, but maybe someone knows what i did wrong:
    I manually compiled evas-svn doing a makepackage with the pkgbuild from aur. Since its an svn package the versioning is taken from the svn revision. Evas is not the only svn package i manually compiled, actually i did so with all the e17 packages.
    Now every time i do a pacman -Su it wants to replace my package with the older one from [community].
    Here's a screenshot of pacman -Qs output before and after such an update. The versioning of the manually compiled package seems alright to me, it should not be selected for updating. And as mentioned, other packages - versioned following the same scheme - are not suggested for updating.
    Now how can i get rid of that? I dont want to exclude it from updating (i would just forget to remove that as soon as theres really newer packages...and e17 tends not to work anymore in such a case). Also I would like to know what i did wrong
    Thanks in advance,
    MC.
    Last edited by Mrs.Columbo (2010-03-29 16:17:25)

    the PKGBUILD wrote:options=(... 'force')
    that's why.  you'll have to add it to IgnorePkg or contact the maintainer about getting the 'force' removed.

  • [SOLVED] Pacman 3.5.1 and install script problem.

    Hi, i'm currently maintaining dkms-nvidia package in AUR. After upgrading to pacman 3.5.1 install script doesn't work anymore. I have searched forum and some googled but i haven't got a clue. It was working with pacman 3.4.3 (i have skipped 3.5.0 release). Does something changed with 3.5.x release about install script handling? Here is the install script:
    http://pastebin.com/Lpehuabk
    Last edited by tarakbumba (2011-04-06 07:18:16)

    I have found the problem, i think. When i extracted my compiled dkms-nvidia package i get :
    02:35 atilla@tarakbumba:~/DEPOM/Archlinux/Paketler/dkms-nvidia-270.30-3-x86_64.pkg$ ls -lah
    toplam 24K
    drwxr-xr-x 4 atilla users 4,0K Mar 30 02:35 .
    drwxr-xr-x 3 atilla users 4,0K Mar 30 02:35 ..
    drwxr-xr-x 3 atilla users 4,0K Mar 30 02:34 etc
    -rw-r--r-- 1 atilla users 1,2K Mar 30 02:34 .iNSTALL
    -rw-r--r-- 1 atilla users 1,7K Mar 30 02:34 .PKGINFO
    drwxr-xr-x 3 atilla users 4,0K Mar 30 02:34 usr
    See the ".iNSTALL"? But when it comes to pacman package file is ".INSTALL". Also namcap throws a warning:
    02:41 atilla@tarakbumba:~/DEPOM/Archlinux/Paketler$ namcap dkms-nvidia-270.30-3-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
    dkms-nvidia W: Dependency included and not needed ('dkms')
    dkms-nvidia E: Missing custom license directory (usr/share/licenses/dkms-nvidia)
    dkms-nvidia W: File (.iNSTALL) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/xapi-sdk.h) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/nv.h) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/cpuopsys.h) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/nvtypes.h) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/nv-i2c.c) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/README.template) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/os-registry.c) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/nv-memdbg.h) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/nv_gvi.c) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/os-agp.h) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/os-agp.c) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/nvacpi.c) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/rmretval.h) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/conftest.sh) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/nv-cray.c) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/gcc-version-check.c) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/nv-reg.h) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/os-interface.c) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/dkms.conf) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/nv.c) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/g_nvreadme.h) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/nv-linux.h) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/nv-vm.c) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/rmil.h) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/nv-misc.h) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/makefile) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/Makefile.kbuild) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/os-interface.h) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/nv-vm.h) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/Makefile.nvidia) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia W: File (usr/src/nvidia-270.30/nv-kernel.o) exists in a non-standard directory.
    dkms-nvidia E: ELF file ('usr/src/nvidia-270.30/nv-kernel.o') outside of a valid path.
    See "dkms-nvidia W: File (.iNSTALL) exists in a non-standard directory." ?
    My older packges also have ".iNSTALL" but pacman-3.4.3 was taking care of it. Now it ignores install scriplets like these. It is either a makepkg bug or pacman bug. Any help or should i open a bug report?
    Last edited by tarakbumba (2011-03-29 23:45:26)

  • [SOLVED]pacman: libusb-compat: /usr/bin/libusb-config exists ...

    Hi,
    I just installed the arch base system and did a 'pacman -S kernel26' and got some errors
    error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
    libusb-compat: /usr/bin/libusb-config exists in filesystem
    libusb-compat: /usr/include/usb.h exists in filesystem
    libusb-compat: /usr/lib/libusb-0.1.so.4 exists in filesystem
    libusb-compat: /usr/lib/libusb-0.1.so.4.4.4 exists in filesystem
    libusb-compat: /usr/lib/libusb.a exists in filesystem
    libusb-compat: /usr/lib/libusb.so exists in filesystem
    libusb-compat: /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libusb.pc exists in filesystem
    Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
    this page I found on google contains error messages very similar to mine: http://pastebin.com/twGU7Yy3
    any ideas?
    Last edited by tgoossens (2011-08-11 17:12:32)

    [SOLVED] I believe this is a related topic: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=23774
    Last edited by tgoossens (2011-08-11 17:11:52)

  • [SOLVED] Pacman "config file could not be read" error during Arch ins

    I've been attempting to get Arch setup for a while now, and after having some trouble with partitions, my wireless connecting, and setting up repos and mirrors, which the Wiki helped me solve, I've hit a bigger bump.  While updating the system using pacman as the Beginners Guide says to do, I get errors when I try to continue the update process as follows :
    btw: I'm typing this on a laptop next to my computer
    [root@McArch~]# pacman -Syu
    error: config file /etc/pacman.d/core could not be read
    error: config file /etc/pacman.d/extra could not be read
    error: config file /etc/pacman.d/community could not be read
    :: Synchronizing package databases . . .
    error: failed to updated core (unexpected error)
    error: failed to updated extra (unexpected error)
    error: failed to updated community (unexpected error)
    error: failed to synchronize any databases
    Any tips as to whats going on?  I've tried to created said files, and even insert mirrors into the file, like in the /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist file but this doesn't seem to help
    Last edited by Windfinder (2008-09-29 20:43:29)

    Glad you got it working.
    I'm not sure what happened in your install but I just finished using an old 2007.08 iso and pacman first starts out with /etc/pacman.d/core, etc/pacman.d/extra, /etc/pacman.d/community ... etc., but I never had your problem when I did the #pacman -Syu after initial install reboot.  The pacman update removes the above mentioned repos and replaces them with a single /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist.  You must have messed up an initial config file somehow as I couldn't get the same errors you got.  It looks like you had your /etc/pacman.conf file messed up somehow and when you pointed it to the mirrorlist it could finally work properly.  I'll just include my /etc/pacman.conf file and /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist so you can compare.  NB*  these are from my x86_64 so for 32 bit machines i686 would replace x86_64 in the files.
    # /etc/pacman.conf
    # See the pacman.conf(5) manpage for option and repository directives
    # GENERAL OPTIONS
    [options]
    # The following paths are commented out with their default values listed.
    # If you wish to use different paths, uncomment and update the paths.
    #RootDir = /
    #DBPath = /var/lib/pacman/
    #CacheDir = /var/cache/pacman/pkg/
    #LogFile = /var/log/pacman.log
    HoldPkg = pacman glibc
    # If upgrades are available for these packages they will be asked for first
    SyncFirst = pacman
    #XferCommand = /usr/bin/wget --passive-ftp -c -O %o %u
    #XferCommand = /usr/bin/curl %u > %o
    # Pacman won't upgrade packages listed in IgnorePkg and members of IgnoreGroup
    #IgnorePkg =
    #IgnoreGroup =
    #NoUpgrade =
    #NoExtract =
    # Misc options (all disabled by default)
    #NoPassiveFtp
    #UseSyslog
    #ShowSize
    #UseDelta
    #TotalDownload
    # REPOSITORIES
    # - can be defined here or included from another file
    # - pacman will search repositories in the order defined here
    # - local/custom mirrors can be added here or in separate files
    # - repositories listed first will take precedence when packages
    # have identical names, regardless of version number
    # - URLs will have $repo replaced by the name of the current repo
    # Repository entries are of the format:
    # [repo-name]
    # Server = ServerName
    # Include = IncludePath
    # The header [repo-name] is crucial - it must be present and
    # uncommented to enable the repo.
    # Testing is disabled by default. To enable, uncomment the following
    # two lines. You can add preferred servers immediately after the header,
    # and they will be used before the default mirrors.
    #[testing]
    #Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
    [core]
    # Add your preferred servers here, they will be used first
    Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
    [extra]
    # Add your preferred servers here, they will be used first
    Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
    [community]
    # Add your preferred servers here, they will be used first
    Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
    # An example of a custom package repository. See the pacman manpage for
    # tips on creating your own repositories.
    #[custom]
    #Server = file:///home/custompkgs
    /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
    # Arch Linux repository mirrorlist
    # North America
    # - United States
    Server = http://mirror.neotuli.net/arch/$repo/os/x86_64
    Server = http://holmes.umflint.edu/archlinux/$repo/os/x86_64
    Server = http://archlinux.unixheads.org/$repo/os/x86_64
    Server = ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/$repo/os/x86_64
    Server = ftp://locke.suu.edu/linux/dist/archlinux/$repo/os/x86_64
    Server = ftp://ftp.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/linux/distributions/archlinux/$repo/os/x86_64
    Server = ftp://mirror.cs.vt.edu/pub/ArchLinux/$repo/os/x86_64
    Server = http://mirrors.easynews.com/linux/archlinux/$repo/os/x86_64
    Server = ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/archlinux/$repo/os/x86_64
    Server = http://mirror.rit.edu/archlinux/$repo/os/x86_64
    Server = http://mirror.umoss.org/archlinux/$repo/os/x86_64
    # - Canada
    Server = ftp://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/archlinux/$repo/os/@carch
    Well it was an interesting way to kill 30+ minutes.

  • [SOLVED] pacman -Syu - Installation just died

    I just ran my weekly pacman -Syu on my install.  I can't remember what updates were available but one was Linux firmware.  I did the command from SSH when putty lost connection.  I logged into my ESXi VM console to find it with lots of information that I really have no idea on.  Neither the normal boot or the Fallback work.  I really should have snap shotted the VM prior to the upgrade
    Any work around?
    http://www.xv5.co.uk/arch.jpg
    Moderator edit: The included image is too big. Reduced to its url. -- bernarcher
    Last edited by Swarfega (2012-05-08 11:40:36)

    Gcool wrote:That wouldn't have helped in this case indeed. If your box experiences a kernel panic, then your screened ssh session won't be available anymore.
    first of all, you wouldn't start the ssh session in screen ofc, that makes no sense whatsoever. You start screen in your ssh session on the server, and by doing this, the following:
    Swarfega wrote:I did the command from SSH when putty lost connection.
    won't be a problem anymore, since nothing depends on the ssh connection anymore.
    You just reconnect, screen -r and go on.
    Second: as you see in the second quote, he didn't say anything about a kernel panic, just a lost ssh connection and the problems it caused. If you use screen on the server, literally nothing happens if you lose your ssh connection, you can even scroll back in screen to see what happened while you disconnected.
    Last edited by frette (2012-05-09 12:47:53)

  • [SOLVED] Pacman wont upgrade any packages

    EDIT: I was able to solve my problem by pacman -R yaourt package-query pacman-color, I was then able to update pacman. Since I like yaourt and wanted to keep it I follow the instructions on their page (http://archlinux.fr/yaourt-en#get_it). I added their repo to my /etc/pacman.conf and then installed yaourt from pacman and now everything works again like it should.
    When I try to upgrade packages I get the following errors:
    [jason@barnaby ~]$ sudo pacman -Su
    :: The following packages should be upgraded first :
    pacman
    :: Do you want to cancel the current operation
    :: and upgrade these packages now? [Y/n] Y
    resolving dependencies...
    looking for inter-conflicts...
    error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
    :: package-query: requires pacman<3.6
    :: pacman-color: requires pacman<3.6
    [jason@barnaby ~]$ sudo pacman -Su
    :: The following packages should be upgraded first :
    pacman
    :: Do you want to cancel the current operation
    :: and upgrade these packages now? [Y/n] n
    :: Starting full system upgrade...
    resolving dependencies...
    looking for inter-conflicts...
    error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
    :: package-query: requires pacman<3.6
    :: pacman-color: requires pacman<3.6
    [jason@barnaby ~]$
    Last edited by slughappy1 (2012-01-17 18:07:42)

    I tried to uninstall packagekit and failed, then I tried to install packagekit-git and that failed too.
    [jason@barnaby ~]$ sudo pacman -R packagekit
    Password:
    error: 'packagekit': target not found
    [jason@barnaby ~]$ yaourt -S packagekit-git
    ==> Downloading packagekit-git PKGBUILD from AUR...
    x ChangeLog
    x PKGBUILD
    Comment by: onestep_ua on Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:56:56 +0000
    Updated this to follow the change of GIT server.
    Comment by: nxarmada on Tue, 01 Feb 2011 06:01:55 +0000
    == Installing missing dependencies...
    error: 'gir-repository=0.6.6': could not find or read package
    == ERROR: 'pacman' failed to install missing dependencies.
    I assume this should be git-repository=0.6.6 Also I can find this package on Pacman or AUR
    Comment by: onestep_ua on Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:27:06 +0000
    This is obsolete dependency connected with gobject-introspection support. I think it can be removed without any problems. :)
    Comment by: nxarmada on Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:40:37 +0000
    So I am trying to compile but I get this....any ideas?
    SyntaxError: invalid syntax
    make[4]: *** [enums.py] Error 1
    make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/ryan/Downloads/AUR/packagekit/src/packagekit-build/lib/python/packagekit'
    make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
    make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/ryan/Downloads/AUR/packagekit/src/packagekit-build/lib/python'
    make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
    make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/ryan/Downloads/AUR/packagekit/src/packagekit-build/lib'
    make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
    make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ryan/Downloads/AUR/packagekit/src/packagekit-build'
    make: *** [all] Error 2
    Aborting...
    Comment by: bash on Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:57:10 +0000
    these lines are needed before ./autogen.sh
    sed -i -e s|#![ ]*/usr/bin/python$|#!/usr/bin/python2| \
    -e s|#![ ]*/usr/bin/env python$|#!/usr/bin/env python2| \
    $(find . -name '*.py')
    Comment by: bash on Tue, 29 Mar 2011 01:14:30 +0000
    also ./autogen.sh must be replaced with:
    PYTHON=/usr/bin/python2 ./autogen.sh
    First Submitted: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:33:58 +0000
    packagekit-git 20100917-1
    ( Unsupported package: Potentially dangerous ! )
    ==> Edit PKGBUILD ? [Y/n] ("A" to abort)
    ==> ------------------------------------
    ==> n
    ==> packagekit-git dependencies:
    - dbus-glib>=0.86 (already installed)
    - polkit>=0.96 (already installed)
    - networkmanager>=0.8.1 (already installed)
    - pacman>=3.4.1 (already installed)
    - python>=2.6.5 (already installed)
    - sqlite3 (already installed)
    - git (already installed)
    - gnome-common (already installed)
    - intltool (already installed)
    - pm-utils (already installed)
    - libtar (package found)
    - gir-repository>=0.6.6 (building from AUR)
    - pacman-glib>=3.4.0 (building from AUR)
    ==> Continue building packagekit-git ? [Y/n]
    ==> ----------------------------------------
    ==>
    ==> Building and installing package
    ==> Install or build missing dependencies for packagekit-git:
    :: The following packages should be upgraded first :
    pacman
    :: Do you want to cancel the current operation
    :: and upgrade these packages now? [Y/n] Y
    resolving dependencies...
    looking for inter-conflicts...
    error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
    :: package-query: requires pacman<3.6
    :: pacman-color: requires pacman<3.6
    ==> Restart building packagekit-git ? [y/N]
    ==> ---------------------------------------

  • "Nothing to Install" Updater Error Message

    I deleted the iPod Updater 2005-11-17 because I was having problems getting my iPod to mount. (That problem is still unresolved).
    I just purchased an iPod Mini and downloaded the iPod Updater 2005-11-17. When I try to install the software I get the message nothing to install.
    Help.... thanks

    Hello, you should probably 'Restore' your iPod with the Updater. You'll lose all your data on the iPod. so if you have any text files, contacts etc. stored on it, you should back it up. the music can be restored later with iTunes. but yeah, restore it then, update it. try that, let us know how you do.

  • Nothing will install or update

    Nothing will install, not even a Flash Player update. Does anyone have any idea what it could be?

    Exactly what happens when you try to install?  Are you getting any error messages?  If so, what do they say?
    How large is you HD and how much space do you have left?
    Please detail ALL you have done so far in the way of troubleshooting?   Need this info to avoid the been there done that scenarios.

  • My Preview will not open JPG files, only PDF.  I have downloaded nothing or installed nothing as I am a Luddite.  Any idea why all of a sudden, Preview would just stop opening JPG files?

    My Preview, suddenly, will not open JPG files.  It will open a file if it is saved as a PDF, but not JPG.  I have downloaded nothing nor installed apps as I am a Luddite.  Does anyone know the deal?  Thank you.

    So ummm.....which app is opening up your PDF files?
    If you want Preview to open your PDF files, do the following:  Highlight your file>File>Get Info> 
    In the Get Info window, scroll down to "Open with:"
    Select the Preview app to open the file.
    Click the "Change All..." button if you want to "Use this application to open all documents like this.”

  • I am using os x 10.4.11 on a 2.4 ghz intel core 2 duo.  I don't believe I can install lion on this system but was wondering what is the highest version I can use?

    I am using os x 10.4.11 on a 2.4 ghz intel core 2 duo.  I don't believe I can install lion on this system but was wondering what is the highest version I can use?

    Here are the requirements for Lion:
    http://osxdaily.com/2011/06/07/mac-os-x-10-7-lion-system-requirements/
    In order to install Lion you have to have Snow Leopard and then update to 10.6.8:
    http://store.apple.com/us/product/MC573/mac-os-x-106-snow-leopard
    Personally I suggest that you stop at Snow Leopard.  It still is the most efficient OS that Apple has devised and it still works great.  Go to the Lions only if there are feature that you really need.  There may be a price to pay in slower performance though.
    Ciao.

  • "Cannot continue, nothing to install"

    So I am trying to download ventrilo. When I first downloaded it I found out the version I had downloaded would not work on my version of mac. So, I trashed it and proceeded to download the 3.0.0 version. When I got through to the installation part it said it couldnt continue because there was nothing to install. Please help me fix this!

    That error as a rule is because it thinks it's already Installed, does it have an Uninstall option to try before reinstalling it?

  • 3rd time trying to download additional content for mainstage....takes 15-20 hours each time...then asks for my password/id for permission...starts installing and about 1/4 of the way..it dissapears and nothing is installed....confused and frustrated..:-(

    3rd time trying to download additional content for mainstage....takes 15-20 hours each time...then asks for my password/id for permission...starts installing and about 1/4 of the way..it dissapears and nothing is installed....confused and frustrated..:-(

    aerol wrote:
    Are you trying to install all the content options at the same time?  If so, have you tried to install them one at a time?
    Yep.... this worked fine for me
    CCT

Maybe you are looking for