Some material not considered in MCTE

Hi,
i done a report on Daily/monthy Sales and the results are not matching with standard SD sales reports (MCTE,MCTG etc). On analysis i found few materials which are actually billed is not considered by the Standard reports. Those materials belongs to trading materials. What could be the reason.
Suggestions are highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Aswin.

Hi
go to mm03 -> sales org 2 screen -> check if Matl statistics grp is maintained.
thanks

Similar Messages

Few materials are not considered in MCTE,MCTG

Hi,
i done a report on Daily/monthy Sales and the results are not matching with standard SD sales reports (MCTE,MCTG etc). On analysis i found few materials which are actually billed is not considered by the Standard reports. Those materials belongs to trading materials. What could be the reason.
Suggestions are highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Aswin.

Hi
go to mm03 -> sales org 2 screen -> check if Matl statistics grp is maintained.
thanks

MRP is not considering material availability dates for sorting customer ord

Hello Experts,
MRP is not considering material availability dates for sorting customer order/ sales order in sequence (thatu2019s is oldest from newest in order) in MD04.
Please suggest.
Thanks,
Om

Om,
No. Aside from my obvious desire to preserve my privacy, it would be a disservice to the other forum members. No-one else but you and I would understand your problem, and no-one else but you would be able to benefit from any solutions.
There are dozens of free public portals suitable for posting pictures on the internet. I suggest that you use one.
Best Regards,
DB49

J1INCHLN Create challan not considering some documents

Hi,
J1inchln not considering some documents.
When i checked in fagll03 those documents are not cleared , it still reamin as open items.
In j1inmis report those docments which are not consdered by j1inchln are displaying.
Because of this some price difference is coming. What is the soluton for this.
Please provide the necessary information.
regards,
Haripriya

without updating business place/section and recipient type you can't update internal challan through J1INCHLN, until those documents showing open items.
update the business place/section code through J1INPP
then you can execute J1INCHLN
let me know the status
write validation for business place/section code as required field at the time of document entry for avoiding future mistakes
assign points
Edited by: Sai Krishna Vallurupalli on Jun 26, 2008 11:43 AM

Open Purchase Orders not considered as requirement for MRP Run

Hi ,
We are facing a issue of Open Purchase orders not appeared in Stock requirements list and also it is not considered as requirement for MRP Run against reservation.
As aresult for a reservation demand of 10 units we are ending with Open POs 10 units and a additional planned order 10 units.
Material Type : ERSA
MRP Type : PD (or VB)
Lot size : EX ( HB if MRP Type is VB)
Could you please throw some light to correct our settings to MRP to consider Open POs?
Saravanan

Can you check to see if there is a re-order point set up for this materia? That could be causing the problem too.

System is not considering Planned Delivery time

Dear Gurus,
As iam planning for the month of January and running the MRP,schedulelines are getting generated but system is not condering Planned Delivery time maintained in the material master ie. 7days.Following is the example:
I have a FERT-X with a component A-1PC in its BOM and its planned delvery time from vendor is 7 Days.If iam running the MRP on 13/12/2010 for FERT-X 100 PCS for January1,2011 then the schedule lines are getting generated for for component A is on 01/01/2011.But PDT is maintianed in material master is 7 days and same has been maintianed in vendor inforecord.But system is not considering it.
Kindly help to resolve the issue.
With Regards.

I have one ROH which has two different vendors.
Two scheduling Agreemnt with target qty 100000 kg each.
Two different Vendor info record with Min. order qty maintained.V1-1000Kg,V2-6000Kg.
One source list with two vendors and with respective scheduling agreement.
Quota arrangement is there in which SOB is maintiained 50:50.
I hv the requirement of 3084 kg of ROH.
I run the MRP and two diiferent schedule lines are getting generated with 50:50 qty as mentioned in Quota arrangement.
Not considering the minimum order qty maintiained in vendor info record.
The above process is correct
Only One doubt In Quota Arrangement?
IS two schedule line is created after MRP run?
Generally System will select a vendor Whose Quota value is less
quota rating = quota base quantity + quota-allocated quantity/ quota
Edited by: Sundaresan . E. V on Dec 14, 2010 3:26 PM

Target sost calculation not considered Current cost estimate in KKBC_ORD

Hi All,
We have an case wherein it observed that target cost calculation on SFG is wrong
in KKBC_ORD where system does not considered the current cost estimate.
We have all the necessayry customisation in place for Target cost version 0 for current cost estimate.
Below is detailsed case.
1 Process Order created in Dec 2011
2 Price Released to Mat master on 01.01.2012
3 Goods movement,Operation confirmad Material Issues, FG qty delivered @ std cost 0n 04.01.2012
4 Order Technically completed (TECO)
5 KKS1/KKS2 will be done at month end.
We know that In Process order, after deliver of FG the target cost on FG is not getting calculated,target cost will be updated only after calculating variance. it does
not calculate after delivery of finished goods, On Execution of KKS1/KKS2 variance will be calculated the target cost on FG and will be updated.
In process order (COR3 --> Cost analysis) Target cost ,Actual cost and Planned cost are calculated based on the following:
Total Plan Cost = Std Cost the material required to Produce X Planned Qty of the required material
Target Cost = Std Cost the material planned to Produce X Std Qty of material required to produce, for Produced Actual Qty
Actual Cost = Std Cost the material planned to Produce X Actual Qty of material consumed, for Produced Actual Qty
The variance is calculated on SFG and assemblies based on the difference between actual and target cost in KKBC_ORD. During creation of process order, the plan cost
will be updated with the valid standard cost upon the creation.
The target cost on SFG and Assemblies is only generated when there is good receipt from production order into inventory.
The target cost is generated using the valid / recent costing run for the correspondence SFG in KKBc_ORD.
All other target costs showed in COR3 (Menu Go to > Costs > Analysis) or KKBC_ORD before doing KKS1/2 is only statistical- However in our case Traget cost calculated
on SFG in KKBC_ORD not relevant with current cost estimate.
However Actual cost and Planned cost Calculated correctly.
Actual Cost= Current Standard costof the materilal(5.624,88)X Actual Qty (13.693)=77.021,48
Planned cost= Std Cost the material required to Produce (6.572,12) X Planned Qty (12.415)= 81.592,87
However Target cost is not considering the current cost estimate;It should be - Current Standard cost of the materilal(5.624,88)X Target Qty(13.958,124)=78512.07.
But Errorneously Target cost is showing 67.383,59 which causing unfavorable variance to standard.
It should be 78512.07-77.021,48= 1490.59 favourable var to standard in KKBC_ORD.
Any help,suggestion and input would be highly appreciated.
Thanks with Regards
Subrata

hi
target cost is your standard cost* actual confirmed quantity, not the standard quantity required
the variance calculated will be always the actual debit to the production order- actual credit of the production order
your actual credit for the process order is std cost* actual quantity delivered to the inventory= Current Standard costof the materilal(5.624,88)X Actual Qty (13.693)=77.021,48
actual debit to the process order is total actual cost which you can see in COR3 report .
By the way for which period you have calculated variance, target cost will be calculated based on that months standard cost
krishna

PO created using fm BAPI_PRODORD_CREATE...Fails to create for some material

Hi,
I am creating PO using BAPI_PRODORD_CREATE......
I am passing order data and afs data....
For some material PO is not created....
Before passing data to function mo. BAPI_PRODORD_CREATE all the data is correct....
But after executing bapi PO is not created for some materials.....
I debugged the bapi...not found any error......
Can anybody help me with this issue........
Regards,
Jenifer

Hi,
Use BAPI_PRODORD_CHANG for this.
Regards
Susheel

Open Items not considered for Payment Lot

Hello Experts.
I have created some open items using FPE1. They are displayed as due in FPL9. But the same open items are not selected in FP06 for clearing. They are also not considered for clearing in a payment lot (FP05).
Can some one tell me what could be the reason for this
Best Regards
Venkat

If you have a clearing restriction, to be able to remove it when you change the document in FPE2 for example you need to activate that clearing restriction in:
Financial Accounting > Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable > Basic Functions > Open Item Management > Define Modifiable Clearing Restrictions
If you don't do that you cannot manually change it.
Adriano.
PS: Again are people in these forums that put answers to be in the statistics... GOD..

Vendor information for some material's is missing in the report ?

Hi,
One of my user has raised a request that the vendor information for some material is not displayed in report where as its available in ECC, now i have checked in BI that information for 20 material numbers is missing even in BI that is the reason not showing in the report. Now what do I do ? Can you please suggest.

Kindly update the master data table for material and vendor.....

Material not subj. to inventory mgmt. in plant F315 (Pl. check your input)

Sir,
i am facing an issue while making sto's
the error is as follows "Material not subj. to inventory mgmt. in plant F315 (Pl. check your input)"
do i need to customise some settings
ply help
regards
amey

Hi
Go to OMS2 click material type for this material you have taken..
Then click quantity/value updating, then for your valuation area ( i.e plant), click the quantity updating and value updating indicator.
Regards,
Raman

STOCK OF FINISHED PRODUCT BY PIR NOT CONSIDERING WHILE TAKING MRP RUN

DEAR SAPGURUS,
I have finished product stock of 50 nos through planned independent requairement. now i am creating sales order for finished product but mrp run generate the planned order for finished product. I dont have planned order for finished product because material already have stock. what can i do please give solution.
thanks.
Regards
Atul

Hi Atul,
Please describe your problem better, it's not easy to understand...
Strategy 10 is net reqirement planning:
- SAP considers only PIRs as requirements, SOs are not considered
- SAP considers stock levels
- requirements should be LSF (check in MD04)
If you input sales order SAP won't create PldOrd for it. If you have stock and you want to create more to fulfil you SO, you have to input PIR accordingly and run MRP.
Please clarify your problem...in a way that we may understand it.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/60/9ea1536fbd11d191820000e8a5f6e6/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/e0/71bb199c9f11d191920000e8a5f6e6/frameset.htm
Thanks,
Csaba

Do not consider the stock onhand during SNP.

Hi APO specialists.
I'd like to run SNP plan that do not consider the stock onhand.
Material A is purchase item. and the forecast of material A has 400 qty.
and stock onhand is 200 qty.
But I want to make the purchase request as 400 qty.
How to ?
Anyone who has the solution can reply this question.
Thank you all.

Hi,
Try following in separate planning book by copying standard planning book.
In a macro for stock balance change the step for calculation of stock on hand projected. In this step remove the function of INITIAL_STOCK.
Regards,
Vaibhav
Edited by: Vaibhav Birwadkar on May 26, 2008 7:20 AM

On Order Stock not considering while Replenishment planning in IS-Retail

Hi SAP Gurus,
I am running Replenishment planning in IS -Retail system, but it's not considering On order Stock (e.g Purchase order - schedule receipts). could you please tell me the config where system can consider on order stock.
Thanks in Advance.
Sagar.

Hi Mayank,
I had already done the steps that you have mentioned. i.e. Changing the error processed records to
"Not Processed" and running the initial load again, but it does not help as the exception still continue to be the same i.e. No Product or Location can be found in the database" whereas these details are already present in the system i.e.if you check /FRE/MASS_LOC or for product.
After checking the help (F1) for TEMPRPFROM, it clearly specifies that if a date is mentioned in the field, it will activate the blocking on the date and if no value is present in the field, then the temporary blocking will not be enabled.
Also, a surprising fact is that whenevr I transfer the product or location details on a particular date, the TEMPRPFROM reflects that particular date even in the interface tables. So wondering whether some customizing field is present in IS-Retail side which is causing this issue
Best regards
Prashant Kedare

BSW% is not considered for correcting the transactional quantity

I solicit a little help from the Group. We have a Crude Vendor which is also in SAP platform . They have implemeted TSW and now Crude delivery tickets are generated from System.
On scrutinty of ticket It is observed taht BS&W percentage is not considered while calulating quantities in Transaction UOM.
Transaction code : O3QCITEST.
Conv. Group = ZCDR.=53&54A 15 °C CRUDE OIL
UoM Group = CRD.=L/L15/KG/BB6
Transaction Quantity = 100 L.
Material temp = 30 deg-C
Test temp = 15 Deg-C
Test relative density = 870 KGV.
With the above data if you put BSW% = 0, then additional quantities calculated are 0.622 BB6, 85.938 KG, 98.779 L15 , 100 L.
if you put BSW% = 0.5, then additional quantities are 0.618 BB6, 85.508
KG, 98.285 L15 , 100 L.
From above it is clear that the additional quantities in all units except in "L" change whenever the BSW% changes. This shows that BSW% is not considered in calculating the "L" quantity.
In actual practice BSW correction should happen for Transactional Quantity also.
If you have any solution for the above scenarion . please suggest.for necessary correction.
regards
Dipak
[email protected]

Dear Vishnu
You r right . Standard SAP behaves that way only. We modified badi OIB_QCI_ROUND_QTY
method: IF_EX_OIB_QCI_ROUND_QTY~ROUND_QTY
coding atatched.
Anyway thanks for reply.
METHOD IF_EX_OIB_QCI_ROUND_QTY~ROUND_QTY .
Local Data
TYPES: T_CTPARAM TYPE OIB_A10,
         T_ADQNT TYPE OIB_A05.
DATA: S_CTPARAM TYPE OIB_A10,
         S_ADQNT TYPE OIB_A05,
         S_ADQNTN TYPE OIB_A05.
DATA : L_BSW(72) TYPE C.
DATA: W_PAR_FLTP TYPE OIB_A10-PAR_FLTP,
        WF_BSW     TYPE OIB_A10-PAR_FLTP .
DATA: IT_PARAM TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF T_CTPARAM,
        IT_ADQNT TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF T_ADQNT,
        IT_ADQNTN TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF T_ADQNT.
DATA: W_TABIX TYPE SY-TABIX.
DATA: W_DIMENSION TYPE T006-DIMID,
         W_TEXT      TYPE T006T-TXDIM,
         W_MEINS     TYPE T006-MSEHI ,
         L_MENGE     TYPE MLEA-MEINH ,
         WA_PARAM    TYPE OIB_A10 .
*-----DATA DECLARATION FOR L15 START -
DATA : WF_ADQNT_L     TYPE OIB_A05-ADQNT,
         WF_ADQNT_L15   TYPE OIB_A05-ADQNT,
         WF_ADQNT_TMP   TYPE OIB_A05-ADQNT,
         WF_ADQNT_ROUND TYPE OIB_A05-ADQNT,
         WF_ADQNT_KG    TYPE OIB_A05-ADQNT.
*-----DATA DECLARATION FOR L15 END -
IT_ADQNT = TC_QT2TAB.
READ TABLE ITC_PARAM INTO S_CTPARAM WITH KEY FIELDNAME = 'UMRSL'.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0 AND S_CTPARAM-PAR_CHAR = 'ZCRD' .   " .   "AMP
    READ TABLE ITC_PARAM INTO S_CTPARAM WITH KEY FIELDNAME = 'MEINH'.
    W_MEINS = S_CTPARAM-PAR_CHAR.
    IF W_MEINS NE SPACE.
      CALL FUNCTION 'DIMENSION_GET_FOR_UNIT'
        EXPORTING
          LANGUAGE       = SY-LANGU
          UNIT           = W_MEINS
        IMPORTING
          DIMENSION      = W_DIMENSION
          TEXT           = W_TEXT
        EXCEPTIONS
          UNIT_NOT_FOUND = 1
          OTHERS         = 2.
    ENDIF.
    IF W_DIMENSION = 'VOLUME'.
      READ TABLE ITC_PARAM INTO S_CTPARAM
        WITH KEY FIELDNAME = 'BSWCN'.
      WF_BSW = S_CTPARAM-PAR_FLTP .
      READ TABLE IT_ADQNT INTO S_ADQNT WITH KEY MSEHI = 'MT' MANEN = ' '.
      IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
        W_TABIX = SY-TABIX.
        S_ADQNT-ADQNT =
                S_ADQNT-ADQNT * ( 1 - ( S_CTPARAM-PAR_FLTP / 100 ) ).
        MODIFY IT_ADQNT   FROM S_ADQNT INDEX W_TABIX TRANSPORTING ADQNT.
        TC_QT2TAB = IT_ADQNT.
      ENDIF.
      READ TABLE IT_ADQNT INTO S_ADQNT WITH KEY MSEHI = 'KG' MANEN = ' '.
      IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
        W_TABIX = SY-TABIX.
        S_ADQNT-ADQNT =
                S_ADQNT-ADQNT * ( 1 - ( S_CTPARAM-PAR_FLTP / 100 ) ).
        MODIFY IT_ADQNT   FROM S_ADQNT INDEX W_TABIX TRANSPORTING ADQNT.
        TC_QT2TAB = IT_ADQNT.
      ENDIF.
*-----Start BSW% in Litre Qty----
      READ TABLE IT_ADQNT INTO S_ADQNT WITH KEY MSEHI = 'L' MANEN = ' '.
      IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
        W_TABIX = SY-TABIX.
        S_ADQNT-ADQNT =
               S_ADQNT-ADQNT * ( 1 - ( S_CTPARAM-PAR_FLTP / 100 ) ).
        WF_ADQNT_L = S_ADQNT-ADQNT .
        MODIFY IT_ADQNT   FROM S_ADQNT INDEX W_TABIX TRANSPORTING ADQNT.
        TC_QT2TAB = IT_ADQNT.
      ENDIF.
*-----End BSW% in Litre Qty--
*---L15 start----
      READ TABLE IT_ADQNT INTO S_ADQNT WITH KEY MSEHI = 'L15' MANEN = ' '.
      IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
        W_TABIX = SY-TABIX.
        WF_ADQNT_L15 = S_ADQNT-ADQNT .
        WF_ADQNT_TMP = ( WF_ADQNT_L15 / WF_ADQNT_L ).
        CALL FUNCTION 'ROUND'
          EXPORTING
            DECIMALS      = 4
            INPUT         = WF_ADQNT_TMP
            SIGN          = 'X'
          IMPORTING
            OUTPUT        = WF_ADQNT_ROUND
          EXCEPTIONS
            INPUT_INVALID = 1
            OVERFLOW      = 2
            TYPE_INVALID = 3
            OTHERS        = 4.
        WF_ADQNT_L15   = WF_ADQNT_ROUND * WF_ADQNT_L .
        S_ADQNT-ADQNT = WF_ADQNT_L15 .
       MODIFY IT_ADQNT   FROM S_ADQNT INDEX W_TABIX TRANSPORTING ADQNT. " ---Blocked by Prasanta on 08-june-07
        MODIFY IT_ADQNT   FROM S_ADQNT INDEX W_TABIX TRANSPORTING ADQNT.
        TC_QT2TAB = IT_ADQNT.
      ENDIF.
*---L15 end----
*---KG start---
      READ TABLE IT_ADQNT INTO S_ADQNT WITH KEY MSEHI = 'KG' MANEN = ' '.
      IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
        W_TABIX = SY-TABIX.
        READ TABLE ITC_PARAM INTO S_CTPARAM
        WITH KEY FIELDNAME = 'BDICH'.
        WF_ADQNT_KG = ( WF_ADQNT_L15 / ( 1 - ( WF_BSW / 100 ) ) * ( ( S_CTPARAM-PAR_FLTP / 1000 ) - 11 / 10000 ) ) - ( WF_ADQNT_L15 / ( 1 - ( WF_BSW / 100 ) ) * ( WF_BSW / 100 ) * 9979 / 10000 ) .
        S_ADQNT-ADQNT = WF_ADQNT_KG .
        MODIFY IT_ADQNT   FROM S_ADQNT INDEX W_TABIX TRANSPORTING ADQNT.
        TC_QT2TAB = IT_ADQNT.
      ENDIF.
*---KG end---
    ENDIF.
ENDIF.
ENDMETHOD.

Some material not considered in MCTE

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for