Sorting Issues in Crystal

Post Author: Nazran
CA Forum: General
Forgive me as I am a Crystal Novice:
VB app writes data to a temp database that Crystal 8.5 reports on.
Database table has two fields (Table.Number and Table.Surpress)
Table.Number is a long int counting number of records in table.Table.Surpress is yes/no field.
Report needs to count and display record numbers.
So if sample data is
Record Number Surpress1          1          No2          2          Yes3          3          No4          4          Yes5          5          No6          6          Yes
The report would hide the surpressed fields. However I need report to count and display the 3 non surpressed fields (1,3,5) as
Report123
To do the count I inherited this formula.
if {table.Suppress} = False then NumberVar LN := LN + 1else LN := LN + 0;
This all works beautifully in the report preview inside Crystal. However when the report is launched from within the VB app the sorting is not correct. It might be something like:
Report231
The report has no grouping. It is page headers and detail items. The report is sorting on the formula.
Any ideas why sorting is different when launched from within the vb app?

Post Author: yangster
CA Forum: General
Something you could try is to group on record number and then suppress the detail and group footer section.This would force the report to order by record number.Also in your formula you don't need the else part of your statement. The variable won't be increased by one if the value evaluates to true anyways.

Similar Messages

  • Text justification issue in crystal report

    Hi,
    I have MVC application with crystal report in it. I am exporting crystal report to PDF, everything except text justification (as we do in MS-Word) is not working. Even in crystal report viewer itself it's not working.
    I have been trying since few days to solve text justification problem in CR. Well I have goggled a lot for this and found different available option to get the thing done. But that didn't solved my problem, I have read many replies on the crystal report discussion regarding the same but no result. I have tried four different versions of crystal report (13.0.5,13.0.6,13.0.9,13.0.13) as I found on the web that justify could work in these versions, but I was shocked when I didn't get anything useful.
    For me it's like justify doesn't work in crystal report by any means. Can any one here tell me who has solved the text justification problem in crystal report. I have attached sample screen shot of word document where in I have specified my requirement of text justification.
    Any positive reply would be highly appreciated.
    -Sunny

    Duplicate thread - Locked. Please continue discussion here:
    Re: Text justification issue in crystal report
    -Abhilash

  • Out of Memory issue in crystal report 2008 SP1

    Hi ALL,
    I am facing serious issue in crystal report 2008 SP1.
    When i am click the page setup in crystal report 2008 ,it is prompting like "Out of Memory".
    Because  of this i am not able to see the default printer in the page setup.
    Please give the suggestions to resolve this issue.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Vinay

    Hi Ed,
    What printer are you using as your default printer?
    What happens if you change your default printer to Microsofts generic print driver? Only as a test to remove the printer being the cause.
    Also, Go into Page Setup and check on Dissociate Printer..... and see if that fixes the issue.
    Also, include all your OS version and patch level, Status of DEP, anti-virus turned off ( disconnect from your network while doing this test ) and Windows Firewall or any third party firewall and close all other software running.
    Thanks again
    Don

  • Sorting issue after upgrade from 9i to 10g

    Dear all,
    It is found that the sorting behavior is different after upgrade from 9i to 10g.
    In 9i, even if the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause, the sorting order is consistent for a particular SQL statement and most likely the sequence follows the searched key fields' order.
    After upgrade to 10g, the query output could vary as long as the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause.
    Is it due to the Reverse Docid Sorting issue? How can I troubleshoot this issue?
    Thanks for your help,
    M.T.

    903714 wrote:
    Dear all,
    It is found that the sorting behavior is different after upgrade from 9i to 10g.
    In 9i, even if the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause, the sorting order is consistent for a particular SQL statement and most likely the sequence follows the searched key fields' order.
    After upgrade to 10g, the query output could vary as long as the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause.
    Is it due to the Reverse Docid Sorting issue? How can I troubleshoot this issue?
    Thanks for your help,
    M.T. This is expected behavior in 10g. Oracle will not order the dataset for you unless and until you explicitly specify it.
    So without using order by clause in 10g, oracle doesn't guarantee that rows will be ordered.
    To go back to old behavior like 9i, you can set a workaround by
    alter session set "_newsort_enabled"=false;
    Also see MOS - Order Of Data Retrieval Differs after upgrading 9i To 10g [ID 456707.1]

  • Performance issue with Crystal when upgrading Oracle to 11g

    Dear,
    I am facing performance issue in crystal report and oracle 11g as below:
    In ther report server, I have created a ODBC for connect to another Oracle 11g server. also in report server I have created and published a folder to content all of my crystal report. These report can connect to oracle 11g server via ODBC.
    and I have a tomcat server to run my application in my application I refer to report folder in report server.
    This way can work with SQL server and oracle 9 or 10g but it facing performance issue in oracle 11g.
    please let me know the root cause.
    Notes: report server, tomcate server are win 32bit, but oracle is in win 64bit, and i have upgraded DataDirect connect ODBC version 6.1 but the issue can not resolve.
    Please help me to solve it.
    Thanks so much,
    Anh

    Hi Anh,
    Use a third party ODBC test tool now. SQL Plus will be using the Native Oracle client so you can't compare performance.
    Download our old tool called SQLCON: https://smpdl.sap-ag.de/~sapidp/012002523100006252882008E/sqlcon32.zip
    Connect and then click on the SQL tab and paste in the SQL from the report and time that test.
    I believe the issue is because the Oracle client is 64 bit, you should install the 32 bit Oracle Client. If using the 64 bit client then the client must thunk ( convert 64 bit data to 32 bit data format ) which is going to take more time.
    If you can use OLE DB or using the Oracle Server driver ( native driver ) should be faster. ODBC puts another layer on top of the Oracle client so it too takes time to communicate between the layers.
    Thank you
    Don

  • Query as a web service Sorting issue

    Hi All,
    We have designed an existing BI query as a web service but it seems to be ignoring the Sort order of different characteristics used (as defined in Bex Query Designer).
    Using the Context menu in QAAS and defining/managing the Sort is not working.
    Has anyone experienced such an issue and how to handle this?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Bansi

    Hi All,
    You can try this solution. It has something to do with the universe parameter, END_SQL.
    I implemented this as a work around and it solved our problem about the sorting issue with QAAWS.
    Here are the steps:
    1: Open the universe
    2. Ope File,  then Universe Parameter
    3. Click the parameter tab
    4. Scroll down until you see the 'END_SQL' entry. This entry is blank by default.
    5. Select END_SQL
    6. On the VALUE box, type: ORDER BY 1
    7. This will enable the REPLACE button. Click REPLACE
    8. Save the universe
    9 Test a query using 2 columns and view the SQL.
    You should see now the ORDER BY 1 inferred in the SQL statement.
    Voila!!!!
    Of course you can always add ORDER By 1,2,3 later if there's a need.
    Enjoy.....
    Ferdinand

  • Finder sort issue

    I seem to be having a sorting issue.
    This order seems odd to me, but like to get your opinions about it.
    (This folder is sorted alphabetically by file name.)
    2008 01.doc
    2008 02.doc
    Activiteit_oktober.doc
    af 200802 - groen reserve.rtf
    af 200802 - groen.rtf
    af 20071130 - groen-geel.doc
    af 20080126 - groen.rtf
    af 20080216 avond - leiding WE.pages
    af 20080704 avond - groen & oranje.pages
    af 20080709 avond - bezinning.rtf
    idee spel.rtf
    In my logic the file 'af 20071130 - groen-geel.doc' should be before the two files beginning with 'af 200802' and not after. Or is this just me?

    In my logic the file 'af 20071130 - groen-geel.doc' should be before the two files beginning with 'af 200802' and not after. Or is this just me?
    OS X Finder sorts strings of digits according to their value, not digit by digit. 200802 is less than 20071130. Here is a note on the issue:
    http://homepage.mac.com/thgewecke/sorting.html

  • Front Row sorting issues

    Hello,
    I know this issue has been posted several times and without any real solutions. But I'm going to ask again anyway in case the magical hacking gnomes have found a work-around.
    I have many sorting issues. There seems to be a lot of kvetching on here already about how Front Row sorts TV shows. But not only do my shows come up backwards within seasons, in some cases seasons themselves are out of order. For example, I have all 3 seasons of 30 Rock (purchased through iTMS) and they go season 1, season 3, season 2. Several other shows with multiple seasons are the same.
    But I also have a music sorting issue. The first part of this issue has to do with compilations. I've got several compilations in my library, and in iTunes I've sorted them by Various Artists rather than individual artists. In Front Row, if I scroll down to "V," there is no "Various Artists" like you might expect but instead a list of all the artists in all the compilations completely out of order. (Actually, they're ordered by their track number on the different albums. Yeah. That makes sense.) I could deal with these artists showing up in their normal places alphabetically, but not all lumped together under V.
    The other issue has to do with albums with one artist who has some tracks that feature other artists. Kanye West's "Graduation" is a good example. About half the tracks on the album are him "featuring Jamie Foxx," for example. So I put "Kanye West" in the sort field of this album so it displays properly in iTunes. Not only does this seem to have no effect on how things are sorted in Front Row, but there's actually multiple "Kanye West"s now, each one identical, as well as multiple "Kanye West feat. Jamie Foxx," lines and all the other multiple artist track. Uh...what?
    So I know that Front Row for some ridiculous reason is (a) not customizable and (b) operates under completely different sorting rules than iTunes (which makes no sense), but if anyone has any advice or tips or comments or whatever, that would be greatly appreciated.
    I've considered switching to a different media management program, but what I like about Front Row is its simplicity. I don't really feel like learning a whole new system (let alone getting my wife to buy into that idea). I've got better ways to spend my time. So, it's a trade off, I guess.
    Anyway, Apple Gods? Are you out there? Are you listening?

    I can't believe we're still banging on about the sorting problems. Apple have seen fit to provide a number of features to allow the user to get iTunes working the way they like, e.g. grouping compilation artists and the use of sort fields. I think you can now even keep compilation artists grouped on the iPod. But why oh why do they then totally ignore this for the AppleTV and Front Row (which look like the same codebase to me)?
    I have hundreds of genuine Artists that I want to see listed in the Artists' list, but not the thousands of others that appear on compilations. They don't even sort the artists by the Artist Sort field that they themselves provide in iTunes. This makes a nonsense of trying to use either the ATV or Front Row.
    Playlists are no help as they simply lump all contained tracks in one great list. Useless.
    The annoying thing is, they can get it right. iTunes just gets better and better in this regard, each release sorting out more of the omissions of earlier versions. But ATV and Front Row - nope, nothing. Still just as stupid as always. Just what will it take to convince Apple to 'sort' (ha) this out? How can they justify such entirely different ways of working on their different products?

  • Issue with Crystal 11 and Activex Viewer

    Hi All,
      We have been using Crystal Enterprise 10 for long without any issues, Recently we had to move to Crystal 11 as our clients are not able to buy Crystal 10 any more.
    The crystal Report is run from our product using the activex viewer .The Report is invoked by passing
    the url in the following manner
    '/CSM/reports/Crystal//Case%20Solution%20Time.rpt?init=actx&USER0=sa&PASSWORD0='
    This worked perfectly with Crystal 10.
    But when trying to run the report with Crystal 11 it opens a file download box and then opens up the report in design time in Crystal Reports itself and not in the browser.
    I am not sure if this is a know problem or if things have changed (parameters etc.). I need to get this problem sorted asap. Any info on it is highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Prachi

    Hi,
    In new versions of BOE you should be using a URL command called OpenDocument or alternatively Viewrpt.aspx/.jsp.
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/800f7400-bf3e-2b10-fa81-c6c74f457ab4

  • Performance Issues with crystal reports 11 - Critical

    Post Author: DJ Gaba
    CA Forum: Exporting
    I have migrated from crystal reports version 8 to version 11.
    I am experiencing some performance issues with reports when displayed in version 11
    Reports that was taking 2 seconds in version 8 is now taking 4-5 seconds in versino 11
    I am using vb6 to export my report file into pdf
    Thanks 

    Post Author: synapsevampire
    CA Forum: Exporting
    Pleae don't multiple forums on the site with the same question.
    I responded to your other post.
    -k

  • Add in to SAP B1 issue in crystal report

    Hi Experts,
    Am using sap business one 9.0 PL 11 in my Local system. and using Crystal Reports 2011. I created some Layouts and imported to SAP. Now, I opened again the same from SAP to Edit. When am using Add-ins -- save / save as, that's showing an error. (Attaching the screen shot below). I checked for a solution in forum and all. There are some old discussions and followed some methods like re-installation and all but not helped anything to solve my issue.
    So please help me to get out of this issue.
    Fahis T

    Hi,
    karthi keyan I downloaded 2013 and installed..but still facing the same issue.
    Nagarajan, am not asking about the issue with ADD On..My issue is about ADD IN function in Crystal report which is not working. Every time i need to save as RPT file in system, then i need to import the same to SAP. I can't save directly to SAP.
    Its very urgent. please provide me a proper solution.
    Thanks
    Fahis T

  • How to overcome the Memory leakage issue in crystal report 2008 SP2 setup.

    I have developed the small windows based application tool with help of  Visual studio 2008 for identify the memory consumption of crystal report object. It helps to load the crystal report objects in the memory and then released the object from the memory. The tool simply does the u201CLoading and Unloadingu201D the objects in the memory.
    The tool will be started once u201CTest_MemoryConsumption.Exeu201D executed. The u201CTest_MemoryConsumption.Exeu201D consumes u201C9768 KBu201D memory before load the crystal report object in memory. It means, 9768 KB is normal memory consumption for run the tool.
    Crystal report object initiated by the tool and object help to load the report in memory once the tool initiated the crystal report object. Now u201CTest_MemoryConsumption.Exeu201D consumes u201C34980 KBu201D memory during the crystal report object creation and report load process. The actual memory consumption of crystal report object is 34980u20139768=u201C25212u201DKBu201D. 
    The memory consumption u201C34980 KBu201D will be continued till the end of the process. The memory consumption will be reduced to u201C34652 KBu201D from u201C34980 KBu201D once report load process completed. It means, u201C328 KBu201D memory only released from the memory consumption. Tool enables the Release command for the crystal report object. But crystal report object does not respond to the command and will not release his memory consumption.
    The memory consumption u201C34652 KBu201D will be stayed in the memory once job ends.  If i again initiate the crystal report object then it crystal report object start to consume the memory from 34652 KB.
    Database objects and crystal report objects are properly used in the tool. The object release commands properly  communicated to crystal report setup. But the u201CCrystal report service pack 2u201D setup unable to respond the commands which has enabled from .Net Tool.  Crystal report objects are properly initiated and disposed in the tool. But the crystal report unable to release from the server.
    The memory consumption will be reduced once the server restarted or kill the application.
    Crystal report 2008 and crystal report 2008 SP2 setup available in the server.
    Microsoft .Net Framework 2.0 SP2, Microsoft .Net Framework 3.0 SP2 and Microsoft .Net Framework 3.5 SP1 are available in the server,
    Could you please suggesst how to avoid the memory consumption keep increasing and  how to release the memory consumption  once the crystal object disposed???

    Hi Don..
    My case is different one. I hope, the problem with Run time Installation setup file (Crystal report 2008 Serivce Pack2 installer) which we installed in the server.
    Let me explain with Live scenario which our client faced in crystal report 2008 Service pack2 Installer.
    Our client is using a application to help to print their reports. The application is developed with Windows service.
    Windows service keep on running in the server. Windows service executes the client 's crystal reports( Labels Report, Stock  report) which designed for clients need and the reports will be printed from printer. 
    10 Same type report (Label Report) will be printed in 1 minute. Reports are not printing during non business hours. But the windows service keep on running.  Memory cosumption of application will be 160 MB in business hours.
    For Example, On Monday the application memory consumption starts with 160 MB. The Memory consumption will be reached 165 MB  in peak business hours. Then the memory will be ended in163 MB in the End of Monday. It means, The memory consumption will be in 163 MB during the non business hours. Reports will not be printed in non business hours.
    On Tuesday, the application memory consumption starts with 163 MB and it will be reached 168 MB during the peak hours. The Memory consumption will be ended in 165 MB in the end of Tuesday.  The same process contiues till friday. End of friday, the memory consumption of the application will be ended with 170 MB.
    Application Memory Consumption slowly increasing in the server. In 5 days, Memory consumption reached Threshold value (170 MB) of the server. Application gets hanged up once the memory consumption reached 170 MB. We got the error messages as "Attempted to read write protected memory " / "Not Enough memory for process".  If we restart server / If we restart the service then memory consumption of application get reduced to 160 MB.
    From the above scenario, We came know that the either the problem with Application object or the problem crystal report object. In the application, We have checked dispose methods of application objects completly. I am sure that  application objects are properly disposed in the application. I hope the problem not with application objects. The problem with Crystal report objects.
    Application properly communicates the dispose methods to crystal report objects. Crystal report objects are not released from
    the memory.
    Crystal report 2008 Serive Pack 2 setup installed in the server. 
    As you said, If Crystal report runtime is not released from memory then memory consumption keep increase???  In service oriented architecture application, how to unload the crystal report runtime??
    Do you any fix for this kind of issue??
    Willl Crystal report 2008 service pack 3 help on this issue??

  • Cover flow and album sort issues

    I just got a 80GB iPod classic for Christmas and I have noticed some annoying differences between iTunes cover flow and iPod cover flow:
    1. In iTunes cover flow, when you have songs with "Unknown Album", they clutter up the cover flow for each artist. In iPod cover flow, they are sent to the back of the cover flow in a nice little "Various Artists" cover. I like how this works on the iPod better.
    2. iTunes cover flow sorts by album artist, so you don't see a separate album for each non-album artist song.
    For example: If I set my album artist for the Saturday Night Fever soundtrack to "Saturday Night Fever" (don't ask why, this is how i like it sorted) then I will only see one "Saturday Night Fever" rather than one for Bee Gees, one for Kool & the Gang, etc.
    iPod cover flow sorts by artist, so you see a separate album for each non-album artist song. I like the way this works in iTunes better.
    3. When sorting by "Album by Year" in iTunes, syncing the iPod doesn't seem to follow the same sorting. Albums are still sorted on the iPod alphabetically. I want them to sort by year on my iPod.
    So I would appreciate it if someone could help me with all 3 of these issues. As you can see, sometimes iTunes is better for me, sometimes iPod is better for me.

    3. Playlists should be sorted in the same way as they are in iTunes. The Cover Flow order is fixed.
    This is not the case, at least not with iTunes 7.5.0.20 and my 80GB Classic running 1.0.3 on it (current version as of this writing). In iTunes, under LIBRARY, I select Music, and I have my music sorted via *Album by Year*. This works perfectly in iTunes. I'll use my Soundgarden library as an example, as it shows the problem nicely.
    *_iTunes order_:*
    Ultramega OK
    Louder Than Love
    Screaming Life/Fopp
    Badmotorfinger
    Superunknown
    Songs From The Superunknown
    Down on the Upside
    A-Sides
    That's ordered by date and is perfect. +Ultramega OK+ was released way back in 1988, while A-Sides was released nearly 10 years later in 1997. In Cover Flow View it works great. However, in the iPod it's sorted alphabetically, which is completely wrong:
    *_iPod Classic_:*
    A-Sides
    Badmotorfinger
    Down on the Upside
    Louder Than Love
    Screaming Life/Fopp
    Songs From The Superunknown
    Superunknown
    Ultramega OK
    This is totally wrong. And I haven't yet found a way to force it.
    Apple, please, this shouldn't be that difficult.

  • Payment Advice Sort Issue

    Hi All,
      We are having an issue with the way the payment advices are sorted for our canadian company when running DME. We set a sort variant based on Payee name on REGUH which is ZNME1, but that field has <b>Firstname Lastname</b> so all the sort is done based on first name. We want to do it based on last name but there no field on REGUH which will help us.
    Kindly advice.
    Regards,
    S

    Hi Javed
    Please let me know if you have implemented any solution to this. We are facing the same issue.
    Regards
    Rajesh

  • Index (HHK) sorting issue in Japanese (RoboHelp X3)

    I'm a Japanese localizing engineer who now tries to generate
    a WebHelp with a nicely sorted index in Japanese.
    As I assume that this has been a known issue for double-byte
    languages for a long time, a Japanese index cannot be sorted
    perfectly in a compiled chm or WebHelp. In Japanese, there are
    several types of Japanese characters (Kanji, Katakana, Hiragana).
    Regardless of what type of character a string is typed in, Japanese
    strings should be sorted according to <i>yomi-gana</i>,
    the way each Japanese string pronounces but currently an index gets
    sorted according to the following order (in ASCII code):
    *number
    *alphabet
    *hiragana
    *katanaka
    *kanji... and so on.
    So here I'm trying to do the followings:
    1. In a HHK file, I put <so>...</so> in front of
    every entry where I spell out the pronounciation in each <so>
    segment.
    2. Open the HHK with HTML Workshop, sort the file, and save
    it (I'll get the file sorted according to what I have put in
    <so>..</so>.
    3. Open it with a Text Editor and remove all the
    <so>..</so> entrires.
    4. Put the HHK file in a build folder and generate a
    chm/WebHelp in RoboHelp X3.
    In the 4th step, I don't want RoboHelp to re-sort the HHK but
    it does it automatically. If I can disable the index sorting
    functionality in RoboHelp X3 (the latest version in Japanese) but
    looks like there is no way to do it. If anyone is sure that it's
    not possible to disable the auto-sorting functionality in RoboHelp,
    please let me know so that I can give up witout a sweat.
    By the way, I have tried the alternative for WebHelp that
    skips the 3rd step and removes all the <so>...</so> in
    the files that RoboHelp creates. The result is that everything got
    messed up and some of the contents in the Index couldn't be viewed
    in a browser.
    Thanks.
    Rota.

    Hi Paul
    Have you tried just right-clicking in the index and choosing sort?
    Click the image below to view larger.
    Note that this may require you to temporarily configure Microsoft HTML Help as the primary layout and editing the Project Settings in order to allow the sort function to appear.
    Remember, you press Ctrl+Shift+? to open Project Settings. You then would turn off (or ensure it's turned off) the Binary Index feature.
    Once you have done this, you would then revert any settings that you changed to allow things to work.
    Cheers... Rick
    Helpful and Handy Links
    RoboHelp Wish Form/Bug Reporting Form
    Begin learning RoboHelp HTML 7 or 8 within the day - $24.95!
    Adobe Certified RoboHelp HTML Training
    SorcerStone Blog
    RoboHelp eBooks

Maybe you are looking for