SOST - Emails triggering - Delay in SOST

Hi Experts,
I've developed a custom function module which will send email notifications. I had problem of emails getting struck in SOST until the refresh happens in SOST. To avoid this situation, I've used RSCONN01 program to start and send process. But, by doing so all the pending emails are getting triggered from SOST.
Client's requirement is to trigger the emails which are generated by function module immediately, keeping all the other emails in SOST queue. Is this possible? if yes, please let me know.
Thanks in Advance,
Siva Sankar.

Oups sorry, i tought its MF 'SO_NEW_DOCUMENT_SEND_API1'. TRy to use this MF.
CALL FUNCTION 'SO_NEW_DOCUMENT_SEND_API1'
    EXPORTING
    document_data                     =
     document_type                    =
     put_in_outbox                    = 'X'
   commit_work                      = 'X'
   IMPORTING
     sent_to_all                      = sent_to_all
                   NEW_OBJECT_ID                    =
    TABLES
     object_header                    = objhead
     object_content                   = objtxt
                   CONTENTS_HEX                     =
                   OBJECT_PARA                      =
                   OBJECT_PARB                      =
      receivers                        = reclist
   EXCEPTIONS
     too_many_receivers               = 1
     document_not_sent                = 2
     document_type_not_exist          = 3
     operation_no_authorization       = 4
     parameter_error                  = 5
     x_error                          = 6
     enqueue_error                    = 7
     OTHERS                           = 8.

Similar Messages

SOST email notification not coming SBWP

Hi,
We are not getting email notifications for failed SOST messages in SBWP transaction. This is happening for emails sent through payment run Tcode F110.
When we directly send emails using SBWP tcode to incorrect email we do get notification. But for Payment run F110 emails we are not getting this notification.
SAP_BASIS is on 702 SP 10.
SAP Kernel: 720_REL
Regards,
Raj

Hi Raj,
But for Payment run F110 emails we are not getting this notification.
Can you check with ABAP workflow developer whether such scenario is possbile.
Standard SAP cannot provide this.
Regards,
Deepak Kori

SOST EMail forwarding

Hello Experts,
Is it possible to forward SOST EMails to EMail IDs different from to which its sent actually?
Some options I have explored are tcodes SO36,SO13, FM SO_AUTOMATIC_FORWARD_USER
However it do not seems to be working.
Am i missing something in above mentioned posibilities?

Hello John!
this is possible for mails for which you are the sender. But what if the sender is a different user then yourself. If you then try to repeat the sending you get a dialog box with the question of your okay with resending and thats all..no possibility to change the reciepent.
Any idea's how to solve this? Is this an autorisation issue?

Service desk-Email Triggering Action is not getting scheduled

Hi,
I have scheduled an action wherein a mail will be triggered to reporter whenever the status changes.
But this is not happening inspite of all the proper settings maintained in Conditions for Actions.
This thing is working properly in my Development system but not working in Production system
I have tried all the possibilities but still not able to reach any solution.
Could you please suggest me something.?
Thanks
Ritu

Hi,
I checked SCOT settings too.
The action is not getting scheduled only so email triggering will not take place.
I cant see the action in Transaction Data of support message.
Please suggest your solution
Thanks
Ritu

Anyone having issue with email notification delay in ES4?

After upgrade from ES2 to ES4, we're experiencing an email notification delay when a task is assigned to an individual or group queue. It's not consistent, but happen enough that we can some what replicate it. It's almost like an email notification from task assignment wouldn't send through until we kick off another process or claim another task. This happens with server default email notification as well as custom email notification. Please advise how I can go about trouble shooting this.

This is what in the log at the time I ran the test process & email notification delay occured. Again, the email notification delay wasn't the issue when we were in ES2, until we upgraded to ES4 recently. The delay happens spontaneously, no specific pattern. Sometimes it'll arrive instantly and sometimes it will delay. However, when the notification delay occur, if I kick off another new process, the notification will come through.
[1/21/15 10:27:47:442 CST] 00000031 ServletWrappe I com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.servlet.ServletWrapper init SRVE0242I: [LiveCycleES4] [/adminui] [/secured/about.jsp]: Initialization successful.
[1/21/15 10:28:03:107 CST] 00000040 CSRFFilter    I   Fetched allowed referer list for servlet:/CoreSystemConfigComponent
[1/21/15 10:28:03:200 CST] 00000040 Reference     I org.apache.xml.security.signature.Reference verify Verification successful for URI "#bed5ed34fb984a88466db43f9ab1cef8"
[1/21/15 10:28:03:684 CST] 00000040 ServletWrappe I com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.servlet.ServletWrapper init SRVE0242I: [LiveCycleES4] [/CoreSystemConfigComponent] [/secured/welcome.jsp]: Initialization successful.
[1/21/15 10:28:03:746 CST] 00000040 ServletWrappe I com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.servlet.ServletWrapper init SRVE0242I: [LiveCycleES4] [/CoreSystemConfigComponent] [FilterProxyServlet]: Initialization successful.
[1/21/15 10:28:06:680 CST] 00000040 ServletWrappe I com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.servlet.ServletWrapper init SRVE0242I: [LiveCycleES4] [/CoreSystemConfigComponent] [/secured/config.jsp]: Initialization successful.
[1/21/15 10:28:30:972 CST] 00000031 Reference     I org.apache.xml.security.signature.Reference verify Verification successful for URI "#a8bc74a810dee608d866cdf3d19861ab"
[1/21/15 10:28:30:988 CST] 00000031 Reference     I org.apache.xml.security.signature.Reference verify Verification successful for URI "#e83cca4f938a1d9f21e821a8c3663008"
[1/21/15 10:29:46:283 CST] 00000043 Authenticatio W   Authentication failed for user [abc] (Scheme - Username/Password) Reason: Username or password is incorrect . Refer to debug level logs for category com.adobe.idp.um.businesslogic.authentication for further details
[1/21/15 10:29:49:278 CST] 00000031 Reference     I org.apache.xml.security.signature.Reference verify Verification successful for URI "#f145055ebb4cb72241a696e2e37912b6"
[1/21/15 10:36:17:867 CST] 0000002d J2EEConnectio W   Service: XMLFormService resource: ProcessResource@5c105c1(name=XMLForm.exe,pid=5908) could not schedule an interrupt for transaction: com.ibm.ws.tx.jta.TransactionImpl@3c103c10#tid=2172366 because excessive time was spent waiting in queue. Supplied timeout: 0s, Wait adjustment: 0s, Effective timeout: 0s.
[1/21/15 10:37:33:515 CST] 00000055 J2EEConnectio W   Service: XMLFormService resource: ProcessResource@5c105c1(name=XMLForm.exe,pid=5908) could not schedule an interrupt for transaction: com.ibm.ws.tx.jta.TransactionImpl@7c5a7c5a#tid=2172587 because excessive time was spent waiting in queue. Supplied timeout: 0s, Wait adjustment: 0s, Effective timeout: 0s.
[1/21/15 10:37:35:980 CST] 000000bf Reference     I org.apache.xml.security.signature.Reference verify Verification successful for URI "#b1ff24709e2764c4fdf7c8f5459a3f3c"
[1/21/15 10:37:38:570 CST] 000000c0 J2EEConnectio W   Service: XMLFormService resource: ProcessResource@5c105c1(name=XMLForm.exe,pid=5908) could not schedule an interrupt for transaction: com.ibm.ws.tx.jta.TransactionImpl@1fbd1fbd#tid=2173407 because excessive time was spent waiting in queue. Supplied timeout: 0s, Wait adjustment: 0s, Effective timeout: 0s.
[1/21/15 10:37:42:673 CST] 000000c0 J2EEConnectio W   Service: XMLFormService resource: ProcessResource@5c105c1(name=XMLForm.exe,pid=5908) could not schedule an interrupt for transaction: com.ibm.ws.tx.jta.TransactionImpl@3da43da4#tid=2174482 because excessive time was spent waiting in queue. Supplied timeout: 0s, Wait adjustment: 0s, Effective timeout: 0s.
[1/21/15 10:38:09:428 CST] 0000002d J2EEConnectio W   Service: XMLFormService resource: ProcessResource@5c105c1(name=XMLForm.exe,pid=5908) could not schedule an interrupt for transaction: com.ibm.ws.tx.jta.TransactionImpl@26002600#tid=2176826 because excessive time was spent waiting in queue. Supplied timeout: 0s, Wait adjustment: 0s, Effective timeout: 0s.
[1/21/15 10:38:38:258 CST] 00000055 J2EEConnectio W   Service: XMLFormService resource: ProcessResource@5c105c1(name=XMLForm.exe,pid=5908) could not schedule an interrupt for transaction: com.ibm.ws.tx.jta.TransactionImpl@50165016#tid=2177247 because excessive time was spent waiting in queue. Supplied timeout: 0s, Wait adjustment: 0s, Effective timeout: 0s.
[1/21/15 10:39:09:272 CST] 00000054 J2EEConnectio W   Service: XMLFormService resource: ProcessResource@5c105c1(name=XMLForm.exe,pid=5908) could not schedule an interrupt for transaction: com.ibm.ws.tx.jta.TransactionImpl@26222622#tid=2179048 because excessive time was spent waiting in queue. Supplied timeout: 0s, Wait adjustment: 0s, Effective timeout: 0s.
[1/21/15 10:39:21:597 CST] 00000030 J2EEConnectio W   Service: XMLFormService resource: ProcessResource@5c105c1(name=XMLForm.exe,pid=5908) could not schedule an interrupt for transaction: com.ibm.ws.tx.jta.TransactionImpl@2b402b40#tid=2179505 because excessive time was spent waiting in queue. Supplied timeout: 0s, Wait adjustment: 0s, Effective timeout: 0s.
[1/21/15 10:40:07:291 CST] 00000055 Reference     I org.apache.xml.security.signature.Reference verify Verification successful for URI "#ea6a84b4552fffe36b7a86269d7b67d0"
[1/21/15 10:41:52:938 CST] 00000033 J2EEConnectio W   Service: XMLFormService resource: ProcessResource@5c105c1(name=XMLForm.exe,pid=5908) could not schedule an interrupt for transaction: com.ibm.ws.tx.jta.TransactionImpl@3a503a50#tid=2184317 because excessive time was spent waiting in queue. Supplied timeout: 0s, Wait adjustment: 0s, Effective timeout: 0s.
[1/21/15 10:42:21:160 CST] 0000002d J2EEConnectio W   Service: XMLFormService resource: ProcessResource@5c105c1(name=XMLForm.exe,pid=5908) could not schedule an interrupt for transaction: com.ibm.ws.tx.jta.TransactionImpl@56fd56fd#tid=2184783 because excessive time was spent waiting in queue. Supplied timeout: 0s, Wait adjustment: 0s, Effective timeout: 0s.
[1/21/15 10:42:24:218 CST] 000000c3 J2EEConnectio W   Service: XMLFormService resource: ProcessResource@5c105c1(name=XMLForm.exe,pid=5908) could not schedule an interrupt for transaction: com.ibm.ws.tx.jta.TransactionImpl@276a276a#tid=2186778 because excessive time was spent waiting in queue. Supplied timeout: 0s, Wait adjustment: 0s, Effective timeout: 0s.
[1/21/15 10:42:28:071 CST] 000000c2 ProcessRecord W   deleting oldest recording(s) due to space limitation.
[1/21/15 10:42:29:943 CST] 000000c2 J2EEConnectio W   Service: XMLFormService resource: ProcessResource@5c105c1(name=XMLForm.exe,pid=5908) could not schedule an interrupt for transaction: com.ibm.ws.tx.jta.TransactionImpl@3c5e3c5e#tid=2188110 because excessive time was spent waiting in queue. Supplied timeout: 0s, Wait adjustment: 0s, Effective timeout: 0s.
[1/21/15 10:51:15:603 CST] 0000002f Reference     I org.apache.xml.security.signature.Reference verify Verification successful for URI "#c536f8c15947c0e0d16970ced8d90811"

Email Triggers/Automatic Emails

For some reason my automatic emails no longer send after my webinars. I have set the time to go 24 after the scheduled time. I can't seem to find the protocol for making sure these are sent, any ideas? Thank you.

Hi fairchilr,
You can check the status of email triggers in log file (debug.log). Also, email triggers (suppose event host enable the Thank You email trigger and default schedule time is after 24 hr) is sent to event host so when event host received that email that means that email is sent to other participant as well.
Thanks,
Vikash Acharya

One email address delayed

I have one customer whose email is delayed 18 to 24 hours coming into our apple mail server. He is the only one having this problem. Are there any ideas on how to solve this?

Header from delayed email
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: test
Date: July 31, 2009 4:28:41 PM CDT
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from murder ([unix socket]) by mail.user.com (Cyrus v2.2.12-OS X 10.4.8) with LMTPA; Sat, 01 Aug 2009 06:39:35 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.user.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E261123C2631 for <[email protected]>; Sat, 1 Aug 2009 06:39:34 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail.user.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.user.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00397-02 for <[email protected]>; Sat, 1 Aug 2009 06:39:30 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from smtp231.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp231.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.231]) by mail.user.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17BC23C2623 for <[email protected]>; Sat, 1 Aug 2009 06:39:30 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from relay13.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay13.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 004AD1CF3C0; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:28:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by relay13.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: s-AT-sinc.com) with ESMTPA id 9BD441CF3F4; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:28:41 -0400 (EDT)
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.12.0.080729
Message-Id: <C698DA49.3B95C%[email protected]>
Thread-Topic: test
Thread-Index: AcoSJd+4/gCxCbtAD0O6xIPHqYhy5w==
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B333190612228378729"
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at user.com
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.706 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=AWL, HTML4050, HTML_MESSAGE
X-Spam-Level:
smpt log
Aug 1 06:39:30 mail postfix/qmgr[203]: C17BC23C2623: from=<[email protected]>, size=17613, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Aug 1 06:39:34 mail postfix/smtpd[471]: connect from localhost[127.0.0.1]
Aug 1 06:39:34 mail postfix/smtpd[471]: E261123C2631: client=localhost[127.0.0.1]
Aug 1 06:39:34 mail postfix/cleanup[459]: E261123C2631: message-id=<C698DA49.3B95C%[email protected]>
Aug 1 06:39:34 mail postfix/qmgr[203]: E261123C2631: from=<[email protected]>, size=18228, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Aug 1 06:39:34 mail postfix/smtpd[471]: disconnect from localhost[127.0.0.1]
A number of emails were received in the interim. It seems to get to the relay server and then sit there.

Charter recently purchased optimum and now my apple email is delayed for long periods

Charter recently purchased optimum and now my email is delayed for long periods?

Hello tinafromtega cay,
The article linked below details some useful information and steps that can help resolve issues with Mail on your iPad.
iOS: Troubleshooting Mail
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3899
Cheers,
Allen

Manual mail triggering issues in SOST

Hi ,
In standard notification type (M1) ACTION BOX " Send confirmation of Receipt", i executed the Email with user's mail id. Mail was generated.But its waiting for long time in SOST(send request) and i need to manually trigger it in SOST to send it users. Usually, mail would be sent to user without the manual triggering in SOST. But its not happening in my case. I think, some settings to be done for it.
Can you please let me know how to sort out this issue.
Thanks in Advance.

Hi,
First, your question is out of topic in this forum.
Secondly, the answer is that you need a periodic job using report RSCONN01 to send your mails automatically.
Regards,
Olivier

Email getting truncated in SOST

Dear SRMer's,
System Information : SRM4.0
As part of the business requirement, our email address in SRM need to be a max length of 100 characters. When testing by creating a shopping cart and adding an approver with a 100 character length email, in SOST, the email address is getting truncated to 40 characters and the following error message is displayed:
"Cannot process message, no route from Sender XYZ to Receipient ABC"
Here is the long text of the error message:
Cannot process message, no route from Sender XYZ to receipient ABC
Message no. XS826
Diagnosis
To continue processing, the system requires a valid route from sender XYZ to recipient ABC (type INT).
System response
The action was terminated.
Error occurred in R/3 in SAPconnect
Procedure
If this error was generated within R/3 by SAPconnect, you have the following options:
Create a route (i.e. assign a suitable address area, which covers the above address, to a node).
1. Check whether the route exists, but the node to which it is assigned is not in operation. If this is the case, change the route or put the node into operation.
2. Change the recipient address if it has been entered incorrectly.
If the error was detected outside of R/3, please read the operator's manual for your communication software or contact the manufacturer.
Please let me know if any one encountered this problem before and has a solution for it, or do we need to open an OSS Note.
Points will be rewarded for answers.
Thanks in advance,
Bob

Hi
Seems to be a bug.
Note 888730 - Approval link in e-mail for offline approval is truncated
Note 615876 - 3.0-4.0: Extension of the field for the e-mail address
Note 595553 - Mail has the status 'Error', but was sent
Note 86106 - SAPconnect: Faxing from application, error XS826
Note 1031866 - RFx & Auction URL in bidder's email notification truncated
Note 851090 - General Note: Enabling E-mail for use in Job Bid Management
Note 176492 - Automatic email when an alert occurs (RZ20)
Incase this does not help, please raise a customer OSS message with SAP as well.
Regards
- Atul

CCMS - Alert for Email-Errors in the SOST

Hello everybody,
is there a way to set an Alert in the CCMS for checking Email sent with errors from the transaction SOST?
We´ve also connected an externe Fax Programm: this service is build over a RFC and functions successfully. We´d like to check all faxes with errors in the CCMS Monitoring, too.
In our SCOT the Node for the SAPConnect was already activated:
- Utilities - Alert Monitoring - Start Data Collection Method:
Data collection method for SAPconnect ran with no errors.
Now i can see it:
- Utilities - Alert Monitoring - Display - SAPConnect.
Into my custom Monitor i´ve put a MTE SAPconnect node, with name:
- ACTIVE
RFC system error: Function SMON_COMP_STATE_RETRIEVE is not available
What does this error mean? How can i easy configure the monitoring of the SOST?
Do i have to create a custom or is there any method which i can use as analyse method for the checks of the sapconnect?
PS: the same error appears also if as test i send one fax to a false address: this isn´t the error that i expected to receive.
Please on reply.
Thanks as alwalys.
Alberto

Hi Gagan,
thanks for the reply, i had already seen this link in internet but i´d like to know if there´s a way which use only the standard methods in the CCMS, without changes in any programs.
Not implemented Steps: B, E (autoreaction method not needed for this alert at the moment), F.
I have also created a analyse method with name SOST and assigned to the node.
But after starting the Data collection method for SAPconnect i see in CCMS the alert error:
RFC system error: Function SMON_COMP_STATE_RETRIEVE is not available
I didn´t send any fax or email yet, i´m still by the the configuration...
Where does this error come from?
Thanks.
Alberto

Sender in email resent from scot (sost)

Hi All,
in SOST I can resend a message, but if I am a different user from the original sender, the email get me as sender.
For me it's a problem because if external SMTP is down I have ti resend send request in error from the SAME sender.
Have You any idea?
Thanks in advance.
Daniele

I'm having this problem too. It started with the last iPhone update. I have Yahoo email, and I'm getting "no sender" messages dated 12/31/1969. Can't open or delete them, and they don't show up in my regular Yahoo email account. After this happened the first time, I restored my phone to original settings and they went away. But I got some more a couple weeks later. Restoring is not an option given that I have to reload everything each time. Just got off the phone with ATT support and they said I should try deleting all my Yahoo email files except for inbox, trash, and sent. Given that I have important stuff in my email files, I don't think this is a good option. Apple should solve the problem instead of asking the customer to do it.

PO approval Email not visible in SOST even after all settings intact

Hello All,
The 'PO requiring approval ' email is not visible in SAP since 10.11.2010.
The user decision task which sends a notification to approver regarding the approval has been going successfully for two yrs and now suddenly since 10 Nov 2010, it stopped. The workflow log does not show any error. Also the settings in SWN_CONFIG have not changed since 2008. The approvers have their correct email Ids set in SU01. Even the jobs 'SWNSELSEN' and 'SAPCONNECT' are scheduled and running successfully and sending emails for all other sap notifications.
Suddenly they have stopped sending notifications for this particular issue.
Please help me, where to look for. Are there any services involved other than these settings.
Awaiting eagerly for the solution.
Neha

Hi Neha,
How you are sending mails for dialog workitem?
Are you using the email send step inside the workflow or you using the batchjob to send the mails (send task description as mail via batchjob).
Id using the batchjob check the that task is present in the selection criteria.
(report to send mail is RSWUWFML)
-Swapnil.
Edited by: Swapnil Pawar on Nov 18, 2010 9:03 AM

Follow-up email triggered on email campaign click

I am wondering if it is possible for a follow-up email campaign to be triggered once someone has clicked a link in the previous email.
For example, I want to send out an email to subscribers of an email campaign, with a link to an informative webinar. I then would like only those that have opened the email, and preferably clicked the link, to be sent a follow-up email (a day or 2 later) with extra contextual information that assumes they have watched the video.
My needs are not limited to this example, but hopefully you get the idea.
How might I go about doing this?

Hi Dayle,
You can't trigger campaigns based on a user's interaction with the e-mail content itself, if it points externally, but you could try to redirect the user to a BC page where you could auto subscribe him to a "follow-up mailing list" before redirecting to the video itself, as per your scenario (or having the video embedded there). In regards to enabling the webform to properly autosubmit the apropriate information, you could build the link by this pattern: http://yourBCwebsite.com/landingpage?email={module_emailaddress}&fullname={module_fullname}. This way the url will be different per each user clicking it, but it will point to the same page. On that page you can prepopulate the subscribe form fields with {module_url,email} and {module_url,fullname}
Kind Regards,
Alex

Sending of email triggered in a background job ends with error.

Hello all,
I have created a API which triggers mail to a distribution list using class CL_BCS. When i execute this API in foreground it works fine and the mails are triggered.
However i am calling this API in a report which will scheduled as a background job in my application and this job executes for some 5 to 6 hours and after that i trigger the mail. However at this point the job gets cancelled due to an abort message raised in
one of the CL_BCS methods.
The method is cl_cam_address_bcs=>create_internet_address which is called in my API and internally this calls many other methods. The abort meessage is thrown from the method instantiate_imp_class of class CL_EXIT_MASTER.
The ST22 log reads like this:
Runtime Errors: LOAD_SWITCHSTATES_MISMATCH
Short text: Current switch statuses are incompatible with program switch statuses.
What happened?
    The current switch statuses that are read for the execution of the
    program "CL_IM_CVI_ADDRESS_UPD_IMPL====CP" are incompatible with the switch
     statuses with which the
    program "CL_IM_CVI_ADDRESS_UPD_IMPL====CP" was generated at the time
     20090902114544.
Any advice would be greatly helpful.
Warm Regards,
Naveen M

Hi!
How you determine sender (method set_sender) ? if you use current user, when it runs on background use a backgorund user and it maybe can not determine an email.
Try force a sender (harcode your user for test when sy-batch eq 'X')
If it works, you need to determine the user to be used on jobs to solve this problem.
I hope it helps
Regards!!!!

SOST - Emails triggering - Delay in SOST

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for