Source table not taken as S_order_item_xa when i generate map...urgent

When i check generated result in owb it not showing source table name as s_order_item_xa.its taking as group name instead.i have specified group name as XA for CHAR_val column.
It should show "s_order_item_xa"."CHAR_VAL instead of "XA"."CHAR_VAL"/*
can anyone tell me where i went wrong immedietely.
Generated code in owb
"S_ORDER_ITEM"."STATUS_CD"/* EXPRESSION.OUTGRP1.ROOTSTATUS */ "ROOTSTATUS",
"S_ORDER"."X_BT_SUB_STATUS_CD"/* EXPRESSION.OUTGRP1.O_SUBSTATUS */ "O_SUBSTATUS",
"S_ORDER_ITEM"."X_BT_SUB_STATUS_CD"/* EXPRESSION.OUTGRP1.ROOTSUBSTATUS */ "ROOTSUBSTATUS",
EXPRESSION.OUTGRP1.OUT_ROOTSTATUSOVERALL */ "OUT_ROOTSTATUSOVERALL",
"XA"."CHAR_VAL"/* EXPRESSION.OUTGRP1.OUT_CHAR_VAL */ "OUT_CHAR_VAL",
"S_ORDER_ITEM"."ACTION_CD"/* EXPRESSION.OUTGRP1.ROOTACTION */ "ROOTACTION",
"S_ORDER"."X_BT_DLR_CHANNEL"/* EXPRESSION.OUTGRP1.O_DLR_CHANNEL */ "O_DLR_CHANNEL",
regards
SIRI
Edited by: user11923932 on Sep 21, 2009 1:41 AM
Edited by: user11923932 on Sep 21, 2009 1:47 AM
Edited by: user11923932 on Sep 21, 2009 1:48 AM

Siri,
You didnt in essence do anything wrong, but when you bring an attribute into an expression from a table and give the group it is in a name the group name becomes an alias for the table. If you still want it to read "s_order_item_xa"."CHAR_VAL just name the group " "S_ORDER_ITEM_XA" instead of "XA".
Regards,
Shaun

Similar Messages

  • CK11N  Follow-up material not taken into account when costing

    We are running the standard cost with quantity structure and we have detected that all the follow-up information is not taken into account to determine the bill of materials that will be used to calculate the standard cost.
    SAP helpdesk has answered me the following:
    "The situation in product cost planning is we do not check availability of any material stocks, and therefore we cannot provide the same functionality as MRP. You will have to create a new BOM that includes
    the follow-up material or apply the modification to take into account the follow-up part."
    Please, if anyone knows any user-exit we could use to develop something to fix it, we would appreciate it very much. It is a normal process and we can not say it does not work.
    Regards, and waiting for any solution.
    Yolanda.

    Dear,
    Are you getting these reservation in MD04?
    Check the Planning file entry for these material in MD21 if not then create it through MD20 and take MRP run with planning mode -3 Deleted and recreated. And Processing key NETCH.
    Also check the The firmed receipt is within the rescheduling horizon. The rescheduling horizon is set in Customizing for the MRP group (Transaction OPPR, Table T438M). A default value can be predefined in the Customizing of plant data (Transaction OPPQ, Table T399D). define the longer duration for it.
    The firmed receipt (the MRP element) participates in the rescheduling check. You can set which MRP elements participate in the rescheduling check in the Customizing of the plant data (Transaction OPPQ).
    Else you can carry out modification A using the MD_CHANGE_MRP_DATA BAdI and the CONSIDER_RESB method without making a modification.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Buffer table not up to date when searching shopping carts

    Hi Friends,
       This is probably a common error but could not find specific note or forum threads to my specific issue.
    We are on SRM 5.0 Extended Classic with SP level 15. There has been no org changes or user changes.
    when existing user tries to pull shopping carts using OLD PO and Template with a time frame, there are no issues and List is displayed to the user. But when the user deselects everything and just selects 'Including completed shopping cart' checkbox and does a search, dump happens with Buffer table not up to date.
    I am not sure if combination of timeout error and/or trying to retrieve all his shopping carts ever created buffer issues. Please advise. Atleast user is not new or changed in the org structure. User can shop normally, but not pull all SCs that he created since his first shopping cart.
    Please advise
    Thanks
    Rao

    Dear Rao
    Go to Tr:ST22, get the dump log details, from there you will find where the error occur, as well as the callstack, Eg, which
    FM, form ,has been called before the error occur. Set BP  there , so you can proceed debug.
    This dump could happen  if there are some data is missing for this SC, in this case, FUNCTION 'BBP_LINK_GET_OW'
    might interesting.
    Regards
    Lauren

  • Dump "Buffer table not up to date" when we change contracts

    Hi experts
    I use SRM 3.0
    Since we have added modifications in contracts, it is impossible to change contracts there's always a dump like "Buffer table not up to date : In FORM ITMADM_UPDATE (function group SAPLBBP_PDIAD) an inconsistent status was discovered. "
    I saw a message in sdn with the same problem and so i tried to desactivate the BADI Check and the problem is not coming any more.
    But I need to reactivate the Badi and I really do not understand why it dumps and the link with the badi Check and everyhting is correct in the Badi.
    My last changes were  : add a custumer field on header and check in the badi check tke rights values for this CUF.
    Thank you for your help.
    Peggy.

    Dear Rao
    Go to Tr:ST22, get the dump log details, from there you will find where the error occur, as well as the callstack, Eg, which
    FM, form ,has been called before the error occur. Set BP  there , so you can proceed debug.
    This dump could happen  if there are some data is missing for this SC, in this case, FUNCTION 'BBP_LINK_GET_OW'
    might interesting.
    Regards
    Lauren

  • Debug Mode - Source tables not showing up in Test Data tab

    I'm new at OWB, so pardon me if this isn't a great question...
    I built a mapping based on four views that are stored in Oracle. When I tried to run the mapping it gave me some errors, so I initiated debug mode. After the debug mode is initialized, only the target table shows up on the Test Data tab, the four source views are not there. How can I get the sources to show up in the Test Data tab so that I can define what test data to use?
    Thank you!
    Doug Faust
    Long Island University

    Thankyou Vetsrini.
    I will try out custom log table approach.
    I see that there is a way to test pl/sql scripts via the DBMS output
    and for that we need some invoking program like SQL PLUS to get the
    log out into a file.
    However, we wanted to see if there is a way to set Pl/SQL log files
    and get PL/SQL logs when the calling program is BI Publisher.
    regards
    Girija

  • Source Table not Partitioned, But destination is, Will Streams Work?

    I want to use Oracle streams to setup replication in a single source environment.
    Here is what I need to do:
    I have a sorce data base where tables are not partitioned and oits an OLTP system.
    I have another DB which has same schema as OLTP, but some of the tables are partitioned. Also it has some additional tables.
    Now my question is can I setup Streams to move incremental changes from Source DB to Destination DB.
    For Partitioned tables do I need to do something special so that it works?
    Another question is I want to propagate changes only once a day, is it possible using streams?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Yes.. Streams work and the data gets propagated when there is no partition on one side and partion on the other side. It will even work when the paritition ranges are not same.
    Propagating changes only once a day -- sure, possible theoritically but not sure how we can achive this.. I think starting and stopping the capture/apply process whenever needed will give you the required result. There is no control on propagation .. only control on Capture and Apply processed.
    HTH
    Regards,
    Badri.

  • How smart is my mac? can use the AC adapter as a main power source and not charge the battery when its fully charged?

    does my mac use the AC adapter as the power source when its plugged in and the battery is full? is it smart to enough to split?

    The charging circuit charges until the battery reaches 100%, then shuts down the charging and goes to powering mode.  When the battery charge trickles down to 93-95% the charging circuit starts again and tops up the battery.  Will continue to operate like that if you leave it plugged in.  Keeping it plugged in does not harm the battery or risk overcharging.

  • Regarding ZPWEIGHT is not appering in TS when it is mapped with source fld

    HAI
    I have data in oracle tables.
    I have one InfoObject(or field) ZPWEIGHT(kf of type number) which contains weight.
    I have another InfoObject(or field) ZPUNIT(characteristic of type char)which contains Unites of ZPWEIGHT.
    While im trying to load master data attribute , i mapped these two infoobjects in transfer rules.
                                         Then im getting ZPUNIT in transfer structure.But im not getting ZPWEIGHT in Transfer Structure .
    why im not getting ZPWEIGHT in transfer structure.
    pls tell me
    i ll assing the points
    bye
    rizwan

    Hi Rizwan,
    I am assuming that ypu are loading master data attribute, it is for an Characteristic InfoObject and the mentioned 2 fields are its attributes. In that case make sure that these objects have been added as attributes to the main InfoObject.
    Please note that you will not be able to load data into a KF InfoObject in the same manner like Charactertic InfoObjects.
    Thanks,
    Srini

  • Sales order stock not taken into consideration when GR is posted.

    Hello All,
    I had a scenario in which, I have created a MTO sales order. I have created a PO from the PR. I did the GR for the PO quantity.
    The plant and storage location are warehouse managed.(The storage location is HU managed)
    I created an inbound delivery and then TO finally posted the GR for the same quantity as in the sales order and PO. After this I posted the sales order stock into scrapping through t.code VLMOVE.
    Now I want the stock back. So I did a 552 with transaction code MB1A to the same plant and storage location against the sales order and the line item. This created an inbound delivery as the storage locaion is HU managed.
    I created a TO from inbound delivery. Now the HU and the TO both have the sales order reference and spcial stock type "E".
    But when I did PGR(Goods receipt) the system posts the stock in unrestircted use stock in IM side. Now there is a discrepancy in the stock in IM & WM.
    In WM side the stock is in sales order stock but in IM side the stock is in unrestricted use.
    I am wondering why during goods receipt the system is changing stock category from "E" to unrestricted.
    Can any one help?
    Regards,
    Sushanta

    you should have used movement type 552 E rather then using 552
    and even if you have used 552 then you transfer the stock to sales order stock from own stock
    follow the steps
    1. use tcode MB1B
    2. movement type 412 E

  • WebLogic 11g: Weblogic-Application-Version not taken into account

    Hello,
    I'm trying to set up Production Redeployment on my EAR, under WebLogic 10.3.6.
    However, I can't figure out how to make Weblogic-Application-Version work in MANIFEST.MF
    Here is my EAR structure:
    MyApplication
    --- APP-INF
    --- --- lib
    --- --- classes
    --- META-INF
    --- --- application.xml
    --- --- weblogic-application.xml
    --- --- MANIFEST.MF <- file I update
    --- WebApp1
    --- --- META-INF
    --- --- --- MANIFEST.MF
    --- --- WEB-INF
    --- --- --- classes
    --- --- --- lib
    --- --- --- web.xml
    --- --- --- weblogic.xml
    --- WebApp2
    --- --- same as WebApp1
    MANIFEST.MF content is the following:
    Manifest-Version: 1.0
    Weblogic-Application-Version: VERSION_1
    The problem is that it's not taken into account when I deploy the application in the WebLogic console.
    When I use staged mode, the line Weblogic-Application-Version: VERSION_1 is removed from the staged MANIFEST.MF file.
    The only way to manage to version my application is to add the flag -appversion to weblogic.Deployer, but I don't want to use that on a Production environment (and it's not recommended in the documentation!).
    Any idea why Weblogic-Application-Version not taken into account? I tried to add debug mode to node weblogic/debug but with no success.
    Thanks by advance,
    Julien

    I tested it at my end and was able to redeploy it successfully with the application versions.
    Are you saying that by deploying through weblogic console,the archive version is not honoring/getting picked up .is that correct?
    if yes, what does your weblogic console shows for archive version,when you first try to deploy your application with the VERSION_1.
    I mean,when you are on the "Optional Settings" Page.Do you see the Archive Version as VERSION_1?
    Deployments >> Click on the Install >> select your application ( MyAPP)>> Install this deployment as an application >> Select deployment targets >> Optional Settngs
    Example from the Optional settings Page for My application
    What do you want to name this deployment?
    Name: MyAPP     
    Archive Version:     
    VERSION_1
    This can confirm that the application being deployed is versioned one and if it doesn't shows up,then you need to check why its not getting picked up.?
    Moreover,You can enable the "deploy" debug flag to see whats going wrong in your case during the deployment process
    Server > Debug > Weblogic > Deploy
    Do refer the below viewlet on the Production Redeployment
    http://download.oracle.com/otn_hosted_doc/wls/redeployment/wls-side-by-side-non-annotation_viewlet_swf.html

  • PO_CREATE  error Buffer table not up to date

    Hi experts ,
    I am create PO using a BAPI, BAPI_POEC_CREATE.And I can see the return messages from this FM its saying that u201C PO has been creating with some numberu201D But I am not able to find the PO in my system  . And I tried to save and commit the data base . But still I am getting error Buffer table not up to date   when I calls the FM BBP_PD_PO_SAVE.
    Sample coding part of my program
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_POEC_CREATE'
       EXPORTING
         I_PO_HEADER            = P_PO_HEADER
      IMPORTING
        E_PO_HEADER            = PO_RETURN_HEADER
    TABLES
        I_PO_ITEMS                 = P_PO_ITEMS
        I_PO_ACCASS             = P_PO_ACCASS
        I_PO_PARTNER             = P_PO_PARTNER
        I_PO_ORGDATA           = P_PO_ORGDATA
        RETURN                        = P_PO_BASKET_ERRORS.
    PO_GUID = PO_RETURN_HEADER-BUSINESSPROCESS.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BBP_PD_PO_SAVE'
        EXPORTING
          IV_HEADER_GUID = PO_GUID.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BBP_PROCDOC_RESET_BUFFER'.
        COMMIT WORK AND WAIT.
    Can anybody give me some pointers to resolve this issue .
    Thank you ,

    Hi Sumat
    Thanks for reply .
    But , I am facing the error on the saving the PO itself . Its dumping wit the error Buffer table not up to date
    CALL FUNCTION 'BBP_PD_PO_SAVE'
    EXPORTING
    IV_HEADER_GUID = PO_GUID.
    Thank you ,
    Edited by: Dhareppa Havalagi on Jul 10, 2009 4:00 AM

  • Creation of BIDs - BUFFER TABLE NOT UP TO DATE

    Hi Experts,
    One of my user got this error, buffer table not up to date when shes trying to create a bid invitation. She able to perform view and delete.
    Maybe i know what could possibly cause this error?
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    This error occurs when you don't have for example number ranges attached to bid invitation or user, who create the bid is not assigned to the organisational structure.
    You can track this error very easy in debugger.
    Regards,
    Marcin

  • Dump ( Buffer table not upto date )

    All,
    We are getting dump with message 'Buffer table not udpate to date'  when trying to shop  ( transaction 'BBPSC01' ).
    Any inputs ?
    Thanks
    Maron

    Hi,
    Please check the Orgnization structure of the user  , who is creating shopping cart.
    Some times , if orgnation strcture is not correct. We will get this message.
    Hope this will helps.
    Thanks
    Venkatesh P

  • Call list: calling hours not taken into consideration

    Hi Gurus,
    I have a question. We are using CRM 7.0 EHP1, and especially marketing functionality.
    We are generating call lists from a marketing campaign. What we see is that the customer calling hours are not taken into consideration when creating the call list.
    However, if we create the call list the "old-fashioned" way (using CRMD_CALL_LIST), we have the option "scheduling... based on calling hours".
    How can I achieve that calling hours are also considered when creating the call list from the campaign?
    Is there a customizing setting, or do I need to activate a BAdi?
    thanks.
    regards,
    Wim Olieman

    Also, keep in mind that MRP calculates availability of inspection stock in two ways.
    Before an inspection lot is created, (i.e. a purchase order or production order is out there and planned already, MRP uses the expected GR date plus the Avg. GR days on the main QM view for the material to determine the availability date.
    Once the inspection lot is created however, MRP uses the end date of the inspection lot which is the lot creation date plus the avg insp. duration in the inspection type setup in the material master.  This can result in some minor differences if you aren't careful in setting your various fields in the material master.
    If a material is going to reside in QI for an extended time, the lab should use QA02 to modify the end date of the inspection lot.
    FF

  • Creating time source table for time dimension?

    hi exports
    can any one helps to create time source table or view_ for time dimension for awm_ mapping ?
    thanks
    Edited by: 1008794 on May 30, 2013 12:21 AM

    No. Thank you very much for reply.I have solved my problem
    Edited by: 1008794 on Jun 3, 2013 6:30 AM

Maybe you are looking for