Special device does not exist, FSTAB Issue

I set up this arch64 install last night, and till now I've managed all right except for one niggling issue. For some odd reason, when I installed everything I forgot to add my "sandbox" partition in Fstab. I thought I could just generate a UUID then add a line to Fstab later, and I did just that. However, as its not part of my LVM, I'm wondering if thats why I cannot mount my sandbox partition from Fstab. Ideas appreciated.
My fdisk -l output:
[root@acer ~]# fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14593 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x379c7acb
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 1 13 104391 83 Linux
/dev/sda2 14 6428 51528487+ 5 Extended
/dev/sda3 6429 14593 65585362+ 8e Linux LVM
/dev/sda5 14 6428 51528456 83 Linux
Disk /dev/mmcblk0: 7969 MB, 7969177600 bytes
221 heads, 20 sectors/track, 3521 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 4420 * 512 = 2263040 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/mmcblk0p1 2 3522 7778304 b W95 FAT32
Fstab as it stands now -
/etc/fstab: static file system information
(cut out irrelevant lines about tmpfs & commented out optical devices)
/dev/mapper/vg0-lv_home /home ext3 defaults,noatime 0 1
/dev/mapper/vg0-lv_root / ext3 defaults,noatime 0 1
/dev/mapper/vg0-lv_swap swap swap defaults,noatime 0 0
/dev/mapper/vg0-lv_var /var ext3 defaults,noatime 0 1
UUID=a7d625c6-0fb9-41f5-bdba-6d306c90739a /boot ext2 defaults 0 1
UUID=a802d8f4-f70e-4ed5-ab72-65bb0ebdca9b /media/sandbox ext3 defaults,users,noatime 1 2
## Memory card at /dev/mmcblk0p1 /media/memorycard
UUID=238db34b-8bf3-4510-b8ee-1aa46e04f17d /media/memorycard vfat defaults,users,noauto,noatime 0 0
The error I get when I issue a "mount -a" as root or just let the computer boot up with the "sandbox" in fstab -
mount: special device UUID=a802d8f4-f70e-4ed5-ab72-65bb0ebdca9b does not exist

Having the same problem with flash memory set as /dev/sdb1. It refuses to mount claiming the device doesn't exist.
# /etc/fstab: static file system information
# <file system> <dir> <type> <options> <dump> <pass>
none /dev/pts devpts defaults 0 0
none /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
/dev/sda2 / reiserfs defaults,noatime 0 1
/dev/sda1 /boot ext2 defaults,noatime 0 1
/dev/sda3 swap swap defaults 0 0
/dev/sdb1 /media/flash auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0
/dev/cdrom /media/cdrom auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0
/dev/dvd /media/dvd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0
P.S.
Yuuhuuuuu post #600

Similar Messages

"The selected communication device does not exist"

Whenever I log on (or come out of sleeping), I get a prompt box from Internet Connnect that says "The selected communication device does not exist. Please verify your setting and try again". I think this started to happen when I stopped using a USB modem to access the internet. Recently I was again using a (different) USB modem, and when I stopped (I now have a wireless router), I now get TWO of the above alerts!
To be clear - I have no problem accessing and using the internet with the wirelss router I am using.
Is there a way of deleting historical communication devices I no longer use from Internet Connect that might stop this from happening?
Thanks in advance.
G4 iBook Mac OS X (10.4.8)

Hello Dunstan,
I wonder if this might have something to do with Location and Network settings.
I'd go to System Preferences/Network and, choosing the location that you are using, select the "modem" tab. On the presumption that, because you are now using wireless router and that your computer is no longer using its built-in modem, I'd delete all settings under "modem".
Then I'd open Internet Connect and see what crops up when you click on the Modem tab. It should be blank. If it is not, I'd close Intertet Connect, then go to My User Folder/Library/Preferences, and there move the following file to the Desktop: com.apple.internetconnect.plist. Open Internet Connect again.
There are other things that can be done, especially in the Locations settings. However, I'd try the above first.
Best of luck,
Martin
If you found that this contribution helped to answer your question, please consider the "Helpful" and "Solved" buttons in this message. Why reward points?
Powerbook 15-inch G4 1GHz Mac OS X (10.4.8) Several veterans that go on and on. 40gig, 3rd generation iPod

I have a device that shows up in my airplay device list on my iMac, and my phone. This device does not exist. How do I get it out of the list? I would like to drop it before I add new airplay devices to my network.

I have a device that shows up in my airplay device list in iTunes, and on my iPhone that does not exist. How do I delete it? I have OS X 10.10.1 on my iMac, and iOS 8.1.2 on my iPhone 5. I would like to get it out before I add new airplay devices to my network.

I called Apple tech support. The device turns out to be a WiFi extender. I never would have guessed that the extender would show up on the list since I wouldn't think of it as an airplay device, and in the list, it shows a little speaker icon. In the process of talking with Apple, I gained a greater understanding of how airplay works.
It turns out that there is no stored list of devices in a file on the mac, or anywhere else. I have seen a lot of traffic on the web from people trying to modify this list, but there isn't one. iTunes, and other devices simply poll the network for airplay devices from time to time.
Have a very happy holiday!
I would like to get rid of "just give me the aster, and stop wasting my time", and replace it with my name. The Apple tech support guy never saw that before. Just my luck.

CUA: SCUG - Transfer Users errors with Output Device does not exist

Greetings,
I'm currently setting up CUA on our ECC 6.0 boxes and ran into an issue when I run SCUG and try to transfer the users. We're in the process of upgrading to ECC. The target systems are upgraded copies of our current 4.7 target systems.
Currently we have CUA connecting to our DEV,TEST, PreProd, and Prod Systems.
The output devices only reside on the target systems. There are no output devices on our production CUA box.
I'm trying to setup the ECC CUA box and modeling all the settings to our current environment. Once I set the CUA setting, including the RFC's and ALE connections I ran scug and ran into the issue.
I only get the error where the Default Output Device is populated. Users with no Default Output transferred without any issues. I looked up notes in OSS and can't seem to find any on this subject.
Side note: If I remove the output device it transfers without error. Obviously this is not a solutions, I was merely testing out the scenario.
Any help would be greatly appreciated

Hi Alex,
there is just a little comment in SAP note #399917 (point 4).
As from my knowledge, the SCUM settings are not considered during SCUG. So setting
'output device' to local will not be a solution.
The standard way is to transport the ouput device information to your CUA-master system before taking over the users. (create transport in SPAD).
I have also another workaround for you gurus, but this will need to modify the standard coding for the time of taking over your users. Using this modification, only a warning message will appear and unknown printers will not be taken into CUA-master system.
Pls test this proposal carefully (coding is rather old....), this is just a suggestion !
Include LSUUCF01
FORM DEFAULTS_CHECK
Spool: Ausgabegerät
IF NOT DEFAULTSX-SPLD IS INITIAL AND
     NOT USER_DEFAULTS-SPLD IS INITIAL.
    SELECT SINGLE * FROM TSP03 WHERE PADEST = USER_DEFAULTS-SPLD.
    IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
      PAR1 = USER_DEFAULTS-SPLD.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BALW_BAPIRETURN_GET2'
           EXPORTING
                TYPE       = 'W' "'E' "Warning instead of error
CL         = '01'
                NUMBER     = 29
                PAR1       = PAR1
          IMPORTING
               RETURN = ERRORTABLE
           EXCEPTIONS
                OTHERS     = 1.
APPEND ERRORTABLE.
    ENDIF.
ENDIF.
I strongly recommend to undo this modification after you have finished SCUG.
Good luck, b.rgds, Bernhard

SOLVED: Mounting IDE ZIP Drives, "Special Device hdb4 Does Not Exist"

I thought I would post a follow-up, since I have finally resolved this long standing issue, which has plagued me since my first days with Linux many years ago.
As outlined in my original post below, every time I would attempt to access a Zip disk for the first time since boot, Linux (pretty much all distros I have ever tried, with the exception of SuSE 9.3) would fail to mount the disk and report back that "Special device hdb4 does not exist". Of course the "hdb4" part varies from distro to distro and machine to machine, depending on how your Zip disk is connected and how the distro names its disks, but the basic error has been constant. I have always worked around it by redoing the mount command specifying just the device, not the partition, and while that would always fail, it would force the creation of the device /dev/hdb4, and I could carry on. Annoying but effective.
FINALLY, a long term answer. I got my inspiration from a really snarky post I read in another online forum where someone had posted this very same question (this is a very common problem with no common answer it seems!). The respondant, who completely failed to provide a helpful answer, basically said "listen, the OS is telling you what is wrong - the device hdb4 doesn't exist - so fix it, and all will be just fine". Of course, the respondant didn't even bother to offer a suggestion about HOW to fix it.
However, therein lies the inspiration for the solution. Indeed they are right, /dev/hdb4 *doesn't* exist, so how to fix that? They had a point. I started researching the mysteries of mknod, a program that can create /dev files, and the even deeper mysteries of Linux device numbers, both major and minor.
In the end, I found a wonderfully informative document that described the current standard for the device numbering scheme used by mknod, and Linux in general. The key things of interest are this:
1/ The major number for IDE based drives is 3.
2/ IDE allows for 64 partitions per device, so the minor numbers are 0-63 for device "a", 64-127 for device "b" and so on. You derive the minor number of interest for your particular device by taking the starting value of the minor number range of interest for your device and adding the partition number to it. So, for example, hdb4 would have a minor number of 64 (the start of the minor number range for device "b") plus 4 (the partition number in "hdb4"), yielding a result of 68.
3/ The major number for SCSI based drives, or those that your OS treats as SCSI, is 8.
4/ SCSI allows for 16 partitions per device, so the minor numbers are 0-15 for device "a", 16-31 for device "b" and so on. You derive the minor number of interest for your particular device by taking the starting value of the minor number range of interest for your device and adding the partition number to it. So, for example, sdb4 would have a minor number of 16 (the start of the minor number range for device "b") plus 4 (the partition number in "hdb4"), yielding a result of 20.
In my case, Arch seems to be treating all of my disk based devices as SCSI, perhaps because I do have a real SCSI interfaced Jaz drive in my machine. So, the Zip disk of interest in my machine is sdc4 (my real SCSI jaz is sda, my Arch root is sdb, and the IDE Zip is sdc). Applying the above, for /dev/sdc4:
- The major number is 8.
- The minor number is 32 (start of range for device "c") plus 4 (the partition number) = 36.
Armed with this knowledge, I su'd to root and entered:
# mknod /dev/sdc4 b 8 36
and like magic, there is was, /dev/sdc4. I popped a disk into the drive and my first attempt to access it was greeted with success, not the usual "device does not exist" error! By the way, the "b" in the above command is just part of the mknod syntax, and indicates that I am creating a block device (vs. a character device, or some other type of device - disk drives all seem to be "block" devices for apparent reasons).
SO, determine your major number by device type (it will usually be 3 or 8), compute your minor number by device letter and partition number, and add a mknod command to your system startup (so you don't have to do it manually every time) and you are done! No more annoying "device does not exist" errors.
Now for the kicker. It turns out that this information has been available under my nose all along. I just didn't recognize the code. If you do the following:
# ls -ald /dev/sd*
Linux obligingly provides you with the major number and the start of the minor number range for your device. Since Linux has always detected the Zip *device* (just not the partition) this is really all you need to know. When I issue the above command, I get an output like:
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 32 date time /dev/sdc
Guess what, there they are! "8" is the major number of interest, "32" is the start of the minor number range of interest. If I had just recognized that, and known that all I had to do was add the partition number to the minor number to get the magic number to feed into mknod, things would have been easier.
Sorry for the long post, but like so many things in Linux, the OS doesn't make this easy on the uninitiated. I sincerely hope that this post may help lots of other people to resolve this vexing and longstanding problem.

Solved!
See the lengthy response in this post:
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=36468
I posted the solution separately, with the most informative title I could come up with, so that others Googling this topic on the web may hopefully easily find it.

Getting Process instance with key '0' does not exist.

I am doing a request based provisioning task.When I request for a resource the approvers are able to approve the request but the user is not created.
I am getting the below exception at the backend:-
[XELLERATE.APIS],Class/Method: tcProvisioningOperationsBean/getProcessDetailData encounter some problems: Process instance with key '0' does not exist.
[11/2/12 0:30:13:640 EDT] 00000097 SystemOut O ERROR,02 Nov 2012 00:30:13,639,[XELLERATE.WEBAPP],Class/Method: RequestApprovalDetailAction/requestDetail encounter some problems: Process instance with key '0' does not exist.
Thor.API.Exceptions.tcAPIException: Process instance with key '0' does not exist.
     at com.thortech.xl.ejb.beansimpl.tcProvisioningOperationsBean.getProcessDetailData(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.ejb.beansimpl.tcProvisioningOperationsBean.getProcessDetail(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.ejb.beans.tcProvisioningOperationsSession.getProcessDetail(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.ejb.interfaces.EJSRemoteStatelesstcProvisioningOperations_6b2f800a.getProcessDetail(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.ejb.interfaces._tcProvisioningOperations_Stub.getProcessDetail(Unknown Source)
     at Thor.API.Operations.tcProvisioningOperationsClient.getProcessDetail(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor309.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
     at Thor.API.Base.SecurityInvocationHandler$1.run(Unknown Source)
     at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
     at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:337)
     at com.ibm.websphere.security.auth.WSSubject.doAs(WSSubject.java:118)
     at Thor.API.Security.LoginHandler.websphereLoginSession.runAs(Unknown Source)
     at Thor.API.Base.SecurityInvocationHandler.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at $Proxy6.getProcessDetail(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.webclient.actions.RequestApprovalDetailAction.setStandardApprovalDetail(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.webclient.actions.RequestApprovalDetailAction.requestDetail(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor665.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
     at org.apache.struts.actions.DispatchAction.dispatchMethod(DispatchAction.java:280)
     at com.thortech.xl.webclient.actions.tcLookupDispatchAction.execute(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.webclient.actions.tcActionBase.execute(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.webclient.actions.tcAction.execute(Unknown Source)
     at org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.processActionPerform(RequestProcessor.java:484)
     at org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.process(RequestProcessor.java:274)
     at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.process(ActionServlet.java:1482)
     at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.doPost(ActionServlet.java:525)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:763)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:856)
     at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.servlet.ServletWrapper.service(ServletWrapper.java:1096)
     at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.servlet.ServletWrapper.service(ServletWrapper.java:1037)
     at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.filter.WebAppFilterChain.doFilter(WebAppFilterChain.java:145)
     at com.thortech.xl.webclient.security.CSRFFilter.doFilter(Unknown Source)
     at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.filter.FilterInstanceWrapper.doFilter(FilterInstanceWrapper.java:190)
     at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.filter.WebAppFilterChain.doFilter(WebAppFilterChain.java:130)
     at com.thortech.xl.webclient.security.SecurityFilter.doFilter(Unknown Source)
     at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.filter.FilterInstanceWrapper.doFilter(FilterInstanceWrapper.java:190)
     at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.filter.WebAppFilterChain.doFilter(WebAppFilterChain.java:130)
     at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.filter.WebAppFilterChain._doFilter(WebAppFilterChain.java:87)
     at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.filter.WebAppFilterManager.doFilter(WebAppFilterManager.java:832)
     at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.filter.WebAppFilterManager.doFilter(WebAppFilterManager.java:679)
     at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.servlet.ServletWrapper.handleRequest(ServletWrapper.java:566)
     at com.ibm.ws.wswebcontainer.servlet.ServletWrapper.handleRequest(ServletWrapper.java:478)
     at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.servlet.CacheServletWrapper.handleRequest(CacheServletWrapper.java:90)
     at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.WebContainer.handleRequest(WebContainer.java:748)
     at com.ibm.ws.wswebcontainer.WebContainer.handleRequest(WebContainer.java:1466)
     at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.channel.WCChannelLink.ready(WCChannelLink.java:119)
     at com.ibm.ws.http.channel.inbound.impl.HttpInboundLink.handleDiscrimination(HttpInboundLink.java:458)
     at com.ibm.ws.http.channel.inbound.impl.HttpInboundLink.handleNewInformation(HttpInboundLink.java:387)
     at com.ibm.ws.http.channel.inbound.impl.HttpICLReadCallback.complete(HttpICLReadCallback.java:102)
     at com.ibm.ws.ssl.channel.impl.SSLReadServiceContext$SSLReadCompletedCallback.complete(SSLReadServiceContext.java:1818)
     at com.ibm.ws.tcp.channel.impl.AioReadCompletionListener.futureCompleted(AioReadCompletionListener.java:165)
     at com.ibm.io.async.AbstractAsyncFuture.invokeCallback(AbstractAsyncFuture.java:217)
     at com.ibm.io.async.AsyncChannelFuture.fireCompletionActions(AsyncChannelFuture.java:161)
     at com.ibm.io.async.AsyncFuture.completed(AsyncFuture.java:136)
     at com.ibm.io.async.ResultHandler.complete(ResultHandler.java:195)
     at com.ibm.io.async.ResultHandler.runEventProcessingLoop(ResultHandler.java:743)
     at com.ibm.io.async.ResultHandler$2.run(ResultHandler.java:873)

Process instance with key '0' does not exist
Such issue typically appears when the Provisioning is initiated without "Auto Save" i.e. before ORC_KEY entry goes in the OIU table...
Second possibility can be that the mandatory attributes in the process form are not populated..
Third possibility can be that the Status is Waiting... And Resource is dependent on another Resource...
Are you able to Direct Provision the account? I mean without raising Request Based provisioning?
Please give us following details:
(1) Resource Profile:-status of Auto Save
(2) Approval Process:- status of Auto Save and Auto Pre-Pop
(3) Prov Process:-status of Auto Save and Auto Pre-Pop.
(4) Is the object form properly populated?
(5) Is the Process form properly populated?
(6) Any Exception occurred during Approval process?
(6) In the OIM Database, fire the following query:-
SELECT OIU.ORC_KEY
FROM OIU, USR, OBI
WHERE OIU.USR_KEY=USR.USR_KEY
AND UPPER(USR.USR_LOGIN)=UPPER('ABCDEFGH_USER')
AND OBI.OBI_KEY=OIU.OBI_KEY
AND OBI.OBI_KEY IN (SELECT OBI.OBI_KEY FROM OBI,OBJ WHERE OBI.OBJ_KEY=OBJ.OBJ_KEY AND
UPPER(OBJ.OBJ_NAME)=UPPER('AD USER'))
This will show whether any proper ORC_KEY was generated for this resource instance..

Root device mounted successfully, but /sbin/init does not exist ???

I'm having the issue where when I boot after doing a fresh install, it gives me:
ERROR: Root device mounted successfully, but /sbin/init does not exist
Bailing out, you are on your own. Good luck
sh: can't access tty; job control turned off
[rootfs /]#
My fstab:
# /etc/fstab
# <file system> <dir> <type> <options> <dump> <pass>
# /dev/sda1 LABEL=homerroot
UUID=877deab9-624d-4e1d-90a1-ccc1d6ebc0c6 / ext4 rw,relatime,data=ordered 0 1
# /dev/sda2 LABEL=homerboot
UUID=77835da5-8a38-44c1-bf27-bb657df4484b /boot ext4 rw,relatime,data=ordered 0 2
# /dev/sda3 LABEL=homeretc
UUID=8a1b5bd8-b147-41e0-87df-70a4a9e12df2 /etc ext4 rw,relatime,data=ordered 0 2
# /dev/sda4 LABEL=homervar
UUID=8eb2e7b1-cdf1-46ce-9dc1-439d002bfae4 /var ext4 rw,relatime,data=ordered 0 2
# /dev/sda5 LABEL=homerusr
UUID=bce162b4-d27f-450c-a0e6-4d3ebc6242dc /usr ext4 rw,relatime,data=ordered 0 2
# /dev/sda6 LABEL=home
UUID=62de76ab-b6d4-4e3d-a423-c287b81813a9 /home ext4 rw,relatime,data=ordered 0 2
# /dev/sda7 LABEL=public
UUID=d98a9c8e-2301-4e66-8c7f-26167633a4b0 /public ext4 rw,relatime,data=ordered 0 2
This looks fine to me, but when /dev/sda1 is mounted at /new_root, none of the other devices are mounted....
I don't know if this is what's causing the problem since /etc, and /usr are on separate partitions from root, but
this would be the first time I get a problem dividing things this way (on ubuntu, mint, fedora, et cetera).
So I tried:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php … 3#p1283343
I get "* is owned by filesystem 2013.05-2" for all three dirs from step three.
None of the other steps have any effect....
I also tried:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=172943
My /dev/sda1 mounts to new_root, so I don't think I'm having his problem.
And:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=166423
I reinstalled systemd-sysvcompat, and I'm sure that's not my problem.
Interestingly enough, /usr/lib/systemd/systemd is an elf file on my target hard disk.
Is this an outdated issue or something? Or should /usr/lib/systemd/systemd be a text file?
Thanks in advance for your help guys!

WorMzy wrote:Oh, and /usr/lib/systemd/systemd is supposed to be an ELF binary. Not sure why you think it should be a text file.
I saw another thread saying that adding an entry there would help. I think it was "init=<something>".
WonderWoofy wrote:A separate /etc is not supported whatsoever. There needs to be initial access to a few things there. I'm sure it could be made to work with some initramfs hackery. But it is neither supported or wise to do so IMO.
I'll not do the separate partitions then. Thanks. I'll check back if it works/doesn't-works.

Hello buy a movie on apple tv, and now can not find the device tells me I should go to settings / downloads / check downloads, but that does not exist in the menu of the apple tv, please help

Hello buy a movie on apple tv, and now can not find the device tells me I should go to settings / downloads / check downloads, but that does not exist in the menu of the apple tv, please help

Welcome to the Apple community.
A number of people have reported similar issues recently, many appear to have found a discrepancy of some kind in their account settings and making changes to these settings or simply resetting them has resolved the matter.
Check your account details are correct, check that you are using the correct details for Location, Region and Time Zone. You may want to change these settings and then change them back to see if that helps.
You might also try logging out of and then back into your iTunes account (Settings > iTunes Store > Apple ID’s > Sign Out) and restarting your router. (Some have reported that after doing this, they need to check for rentals even though it may report that there aren’t any, after which rentals once again appear in the ‘movies’ feature)
Rentals should appear under their own heading in the ‘Movies’ feature, you might also check at Settings > iTunes Store > Check For Rentals.

Copy response to FTP Device failing - ERROR: E_NOENT - File Does Not Exist

I have a asset subscription that encodes and delivers to a FTP server when a checkbox is ticked in an asset's metadata.
Whilst the clip is transcoded and delivered, the copy response reports a failure with the message: 'ERROR: E_NOENT - File Does Not Exist: <filename>.<eextension>' referring to the transcoded file
The subscription has 3 responses, A WMV, a FLV and a JPG compression, all of which work if I export the asset manually.
It doesn't matter which response I put first in the Subscription as they all report the error and stop the other 2 responses.
I have had a search through the previous discussions, but couldn't find any answers.
I am running a fresh install of OSX Server 10.5.5 with just Final Cut Server installed, and everything is up to date (Pro Apps and FCSvr, Java etc).
The only other apps installed are:
Fibrejet 2.7.3
Flip4Mac WMV Studio Pro HD 2.2.1.11
Adobe CS3 Flash Video Encoder

I am having a similar issue. All I am trying at the moment is a nuts and bolts copy to an FTP device. I have checked and rechecked remote directories, permissions, and login info. My copy response will transcode to a web-friendly quicktime, then fails trying to copy, saying the file doesn't exist.
I think I am missing a fundamental part of the process but reading through the manuals hasn't turned up solutions.

The "add a device" screen on the desktop does not exist.

The "add a device" screen shown in all the tutorials does not exist on the desktop version of firefox. It is impossible to enter the sync code. There is only a big button "create account" there but i already have an account. The button "conect" generates a code, but there is no way to enter it on the phone. The whole thing is broken and complicated and impossible to understand. Sorry.

Right. The problem is that you need to properly set up Sync.
Click the button there, 'Set up Firefox Sync'. If you don't have an account select 'Create a new Account', otherwise at the bottom, 'I already have a Sync account' -> 'I don't have a device with me' -> complete all details -> continue -- and then you will see the 'Add a device' option in the Sync preferences pane.
The setup is complicated, convoluted and not ideal, and it is being worked on, but that should resolve your issue.

Error while PGI... Special stock 2010 Q for this mat. does not exist

Hi friends,
While PGI system is showing error that particular material, and wbs element special stock Q in sloc 2010 stock does not exist.....
But stock is present.....
I hve checked all relevant things reg..... stock and reservation...
We are facing this issue for PGI for free of charge.........
Plz. help......
Thanks
Navin

Hi,
Please check in MB52 whether the stock of your material belongs to special stock 'Q' + relevant WBS_ID. If your stock level is high enough but the goods are not under the WBS' special stock you cannot post goods isue I guess...
Csaba
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jun 9, 2008 5:13 PM

While creating SAP ISU Device category i got one error message like The material 5 does not exist or is not activated Message no. M3305

while creating SAP ISU Device category EG01 .i got one error message like The material 5 does not exist or is not activated Message no. M3305

I don't know EG01 transaction, but if SAP says "material 5 does not exist " then SAP is usually right.
Can you give an evidence that material 5 exists? e.g. screenshot from SE16 at table MARA, MARC and MAST

Object does not exist : MESSAGE OL 826 - Production issue

R/3 release 4.6C
Transaction: FB03
Custom WF: Triggering events: FIPP-CREATE and FIPP-COMPLETED
When we try to post a document (journal) the workflow gets triggered and reaches the approver. The approver approves it and then it gets posted.
Here in this case, after the approval the workflow running into error with u201Cmessage OL 826 Object does not existu201D
When I click on the message I get this information
Object does not exist   :   Message no. OL 826
Diagnosis :   You tried to create an instance of the object type EMPLOYEET with the
                    key 1234520080603. No instance of this kind exists.
                PERNR u2013 12345
     Date      - 03.06.2008
I checked this using the FM P_EMPLOYEE_CHECKEXISTENCE and it is working fine there. This FM is used in EMPLOYEET object for existence check.
Initially I thought the problem was with document and the buffer but after checking u201Cdiagnosisu201D message, it confirms me that this is related to Employee.
This is happening only to one employee and all other have NO issues.
I have checked with HR team and they reckon everything is fine from their side.
Since this is in Prod I am unable to debug and test.
I was looking into the previous forums to find the solution but couldnu2019t find RIGHT one. Could you please suggest any solution for this ?
Your help greatly appreciated.
Sreethan
Edited by: SAP User on Jun 12, 2008 12:13 PM

Dear Mike/Martin,
        Could you please explain a bit about the authorization problem?
        PERNR    A, B, C, and D do the posting the docs through FB01 and PERNR X usually do the approvals. the problem is happening onlyl with PERNR A ... if the approver has the auth problem then it could be same issue with other... please correct me if I am wrong.
    As Martin suggested I have contacted HR team but they say .... they dont see anything different or changes for this EMP. The personal record is coming from the EVENT FIPP-CREATE or COMPLETED so there is no manual interaction.
Just guessing: if this is the problem for all the employees then what could be the reason ? guessing that in random it is happening to this emp. He has posted 6 docs....all of them have the same issue. I checked last 3 months records and I did see Couple of workflows in last 3 months with the same error.... so just thinking if this is the problem with all emp happens onlly ramdomly.
Thoughts ??
Thanks & Regards,
Sreethan

Graphical mapping issue with useOneAsMany if segment does not exist

Hi all
I have an issue with graphical mapping in an IDoc to file scenario. I need to have header level fields mapped to line item fields. Whether or not and how many source header segments of the same type exist depends on a qualifier (QUALF). This is generally working if I use the following graphical mapping:
if QUALF = 001 then <source> -> removeContext -> useOneAsMany -> splitByValue -> <target>
... with setting QUALF, <source>, and the second input for the useOneAsMany to the highest possible context node.
Nevertheless, if the segment with the qualifier 001 does not exist in the source then the mapping throws the error "Too few values in first queue in fuction useOneAsMany". Whatever I've tried, the mapping wants to execute the useOneAsMany statement anyway and I haven't found a way to omit this. Whether the target would be created with an empty value or not created at all would be secondary. Would eventually somebody have a solution to this problem?
Thanks in advance,
Daniel

Daniel,
try using mapWithDefault function before useAsmany
if QUALF = 001 then <source> -> removeContext -> <b>MapwithDefault</b>->useOneAsMany -> splitByValue -> <target>
I think it takes care even if the value occur in the contaxt or.
Babu

Line item does not exists for Good issue

Dear All,
User have created a outbound delivery and perform Post good issue.No billing document has been created yet. Somehow lineitem does not exists in the delivery document however Material Document for Good issue exists with reference to Delivery Document. I tried to reverse the delivery document with reference . No error was occured but still no reversal was updated on Delivery document. I know it is not possible to delete line item without reversal of PGI but system is showing me the status as described
Prompt response in this regard is highly appreciable
Thank you,
Nomi

Solution has been identified, If goods has been issued then Returns Process wrt Sales Order solved the problem for my rare process. Goods have been transfered to unristricted stock.
Thank you all for your support
Best Regards,
NoMi

Special device does not exist, FSTAB Issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for