Specific camera profile in camera raw

I’ve just started using Lightroom 5 & Photoshop CC in Creative Cloud and understood that there would be a specific profile for my Panasonic GH3 in Camera Raw, that is I expected the programme to suggest default adjustments specifically tuned to the characteristics of my camera. I can’t find this anywhere in the programmes, indeed the only reference to my camera/lens combination is in the metadata and camera Raw seems to work on an Adobe default.
Am I missing something?
Jeff Hodgson

What profile options you have depends on how many profile Adobe ships for camera and how many profiles you save for you camera. The name may seem the same for other models but the are for a particular Camera model. The The Pull-Down profile menu jsy does not display the camera model.  If you look in the folder Adobe stores the Camera Profiles you will get an Idea of how many profiles are on your system. I'm on Windows the root folder for Camera profiles is "C:\ProgramData\Adobe\CameraRaw\CameraProfiles" It has two sub folders "Adobe Standard" and "Camera" in "Adobe Standard" adobe stores all its standard profile for all the cameras it has profile for.  The  "Camera"  has sub folders for each model camera and those folders may have several profiles for the camera model.

Similar Messages

  • I would like to add a new Canon camera profile to the RAW interface

    Hi,  I would like to add a new Canon camera profile to the RAW interface.
    I have recently installed the new camera profile 'Studio Portrait' which i download from here:
    http://www.canon.co.jp/imaging/picturestyle/file/studio-portrait.html
    When I open up a RAW files in Camera RAW, go to 'Camera Calibration', click on the drop down list called
    'Camera Profile'  I only see  'Adobe Standard, Faithful etc etc'.
    My questions are, can i add the same camera profile i put in my camera, into a folder with in photoshop?
    Or is photoshop reading the raw file and only seeing the default camera profiles?
    If I could see the new camera profile listed it would help with work flow.
    Best
    JL-B
    Please help, ive not had a good time waiting on the phone and trying to explain this to a live chat, hours have been wasted. Once i know the answer I can get back to the commission.

    Are you following this
    Apply a camera profile
    To apply a camera profile, select it from the Camera Profile pop-up menu in the Camera Calibration tab of the Camera Raw dialog box. The Adobe Standard profile for a camera is named Adobe Standard. Camera Matching profiles include the prefix Camera in the profile name. The Camera Profile pop-up menu displays only profiles for your camera.
    If the only profile in the Camera Profilemenu is Embedded, it means that you have selected a TIFF or JPEG image. Adobe Standard and Camera Matching profiles work only with raw images.
    Note:  If you have selected a raw file and Adobe Standardand Camera Matching profiles do not appear in the Camera Profilepop-up menu, download the latest Camera Raw update. 

  • How can i create a camera profile with camera raw?

    Hi
    how can i create a camera profile with camera raw without x-rite or other third software?
    i have a Colour Checker ,with different shade of gray and different colors
    i remember about a script or something like that
    i google a lot , but without luck
    can i create my camera raw profile using a color checker with photoshop acr ?
    i'm not sure but this should be the script http://simon.tindemans.eu/tools/acrcalibrator , right?
    but i don't know how use it
    is there a tutorial ? maybe a video to create a profile with camera raw
    thanks
    greetings

    Hello, I think that you search for https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/entitlement/index.cfm?e=labs%5Fdngprofileeditor
    Here is a PDF from adobe about it: http://wwwimages.adobe.com/www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/products/photoshop/pdfs/cs6/ DNGProfile_EditorDocumentation.pdf
    And an article: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/accessories/dng-profiles.shtml

  • How do I install a camera profile into CS2 raw converter

    I recently purchased a ColorChecker Passport and along with the software, created a camera profile for my Olympus E-300. The CCP software crated a camera profile that was duly placed into the c:\users\<username>\AppData\Roaming\adobe\cameraraw\cameraprofile\olumpus e-300 Directory. When I open an olympus ORF raw file from cs2 or bridge, and select the calibrate tab the only thing that is available in the camera calibrate box is ACR 2.4. Clicking the drop down arrow doesn't show anything else.
    I have turned off colormanagement in photoshop.
    Can anybody tell me how I can get photo shop to recognize the new camera profile?
    I have tried restarting photoshop and Bridge after the DCp file was added to teh directory.
    ACR verssion 3.7(?)
    OS is windows home 64
    8 gigs of ram
    Photoshop cs2 version 9.0.1
    adobe bridge cs2 version 1.0.4.6
    I have also performed the same tasks on photoshop cs3 on my work computer with the same results.

    The earliest version of Camera Raw to use DNG Profiles was version 4.6 in Photoshop CS3...so, you won't be able to use that DNG profile in ACR 3.7.

  • Camera Profiles in Camera RAW

    I just came back from a shoot at the Bosque del Apache NWR and discovered that my D3X NEF files do not have a camera profile pn the Camera Calibration Tab in Camera RAW. The only thing in the profile pulldown is MATRIX and there should at least 6-7 different profiles. My D300 files have all of the profiles in Camera RAW. I even went back to NEF files that had Camera RAW profiles and they are missing as well. I am currently running Camera RAW v6.6.
    What gives? How do I get the profiles back?
    Thanks in advance.
    John Munro

    Here's the link to the Adobe Camera Raw forum:
    Adobe Camera Raw
    Wo Tai Lao Le
    我太老了

  • Can't Find Camera Profile in Camera RAW Plug-In

    I own a GoPro Hero 3 Black camera.  I saw the Russell Brown demonstration of Camera RAW to correct lens distortion (http://tv.adobe.com/watch/take-flight-into-the-adobe-creative-cloud/creating-aerial-panora mas-from-gopro-hero-3-images/).  In this instruction, he takes images into Camera RAW and selects a tab called Profile, and it automatically detected the camera from metadata and made corrections.
    I was sold, subscribed to Adobe Cloud, downloaded Photoshop and started following his tutorial.  When I got to the lens correction part, my Camera RAW has no Profiles tab.   Brown does say that you need the latest version, but I have assumed that since I just subscribed and downloaded, that I have that.
    Please advise.

    My explanation was why there is no Camera Profile area in the ACR filter; however, that may not be the entire story for why you can’t find the Go Pro profiles:
    First, the Lens Correction filter has long had access to the camera profiles.  There are a few that work with JPG images, so you should be able to get them that way without having to use the CR Filter in PS-CC.
    And, the Hero 3 profiles are new, and only in the Release Candidate versions of PS/ACR 8.2 RC and LR 5.2 RC available from Adobe Labs: 
    http://www.adobe.com/
    ACR 8.2 and LR 5.2 should be final release in a week or two, I’d guess, but until then you’d want to download the RCs.  Installing the DNG Converter 8.2 RC as linked, above, will probably give you the camera profiles for and older ACR 8.1, but not for LR 5.0, so if you want things to work completely, install ACR 8.2 RC and LR 5.2 RC, and then report back what isn’t working.

  • ACR Camera Profiles and Camera Manufacturing Tolerances

    For every camera model there is one set of model specific ACR camera profiles. Although those profiles are model specific, they are not camera specific. I'd suspect that not all cameras of the same model will produce exactly the same colors due to manufacturing variations. I'm wondering if differences in color rendition between cameras of the same model are visible or neglectable? Any experiences?
    A similar question: Taking the "same" photo with a Canon 550D and a Nikon D90 camera and processing the RAWs in LR with Adobe Standard profile can result in quite different colors (even when setting WB manually). Shouldn’t the processed photos look almost the same?
    Thanks in advance for any help!

    My Nikon D80 and D90 don't look the same and I have run comparisons between the Canon 7D and the Nikon D90. Taken together, they all different from each other.
    The biggest difference between the D80 and the D90 seems to lie with the much larger dynamic range of the D90. Compared to the D80 at first glance, the D90 seems washed out at the lower values. This is easily overcome in ACR, but even with that, the subjectivity of the reproduction sometimes gives a nod to one over the other.
    The closest film comparison is Fuji Astia vs Provia. The D90 at default Nikon Camera Standard resembles Astia, while the D80 is a cross between Provia and Velvia. All this is controlable. One slider I use to enrich the D90 presentation is the black slider
    The Canon has other undefined differences which I have simply noted by viewing. I haven't engaged in any tweaking of that camera's images.
    So I'll use both the D80 and the D90 according to what I am wanting to happen. Of course, there are times where the differences simply inform the operator of what may be doable, and then one is tweaked to look much like the other.
    I checked out sprengel's links to the calibrator software. They have stopped at CS3, it seems. How does it perform with CS5? I may want to at least run a calibration of both cameras and look again.
    And, of course, Adobe Standard and Nikon Standard do not agree. At all. So, when is a standard not a standard?
    When there is more than one.
    Looking back at your post, I should specify that the profile I used when making the comparisons have been  the Camera standards, not Adobe Standard.
    Message was edited by: Hudechrome

  • Camera Profiles in Camera Calibration do not reproduce JPG look

    I shoot on my Nikon D700 in "RAW + FINE" mode, which means that for each picture the camera records two images: a RAW file, as well as a high-resolution JPG file.
    As is well known, RAW files often look washed out, since they don't have any of the extra saturation and sharpening settings applied that the camera automatically applies to JPGs.
    Camera Calibration / Camera Profiles is supposed to solve this problem by applying some of those standard JPG enhancements to RAW files. However, no matter which Camera Profile I choose (there are about 10 different ones shown in the Lightroom dropdown), none of them look like the JPG. The "Camera Neutral" profile comes the closest. But even this profile makes the RAW image look less saturated than the corresponding JPG.
    How can I reproduce the JPG look EXACTLY? The Camera Profiles give me an approximation at best, but it still does not come close to the JPG look.

    As is well known, RAW files often look washed out, since they don't have any of the extra saturation and sharpening settings applied that the camera automatically applies to JPGs.
    Camera Calibration / Camera Profiles is supposed to solve this problem by applying some of those standard JPG enhancements to RAW files.
    I don't think this is a true statement.
    Camera Raw does not and cannot not know what settings you had in your camera that affect the JPG ... things like high contrast, high saturation, etc.
    How can I reproduce the JPG look EXACTLY? The Camera Profiles give me an approximation at best, but it still does not come close to the JPG look.
    The point of shooting RAW is not to reproduce that JPG look. The point of shooting RAW is to give you more control over the final appearance than you can get from shooting JPG (in other words, you might get processed photos that look nicer than the JPG). If you want to spend your time trying to reproduce that JPG look in your RAW photos, you will spend a lot of time and get very frustrated and not have that much success.
    If you want that JPG look, use your JPGs. It's a lot simpler and faster.

  • "Camera Profile" in Camera Calibration ACR tab - Q

    I upgraded from PSE5 whcih used ACR 4.7 - and now using PSE8 w ACR 6.1
    In the Camera Calibration tab in the Camera Profile drop down - I see "ACR 4.7" still listed.
    Can someone tell me how to make use of this tab and how I can delete the ACR 4.7 and use 6.1 - if there is a benefit to doing so?
    Thank-you!

    I think the issue could be that I have both PSE 5 & 8 installed at the moment.  I'm using the 30 Day Trial - and I'll uninstall PSE 5 once I get my actual disc & serial # in the mail. I did not want to uninstall v5 until I had the v8 serial # and was convinced that v8 worked well.  During the v8 installation - it recognised v5 but said I can keep it.  My concern is uninstalling both and reinstalling v8 and having catalog & stack issues.
    I installed the camera profiles as Adobe directs "before" pasting the new ACR 6.1 file in the folder.
    Nevertheless, I installed the cameraprofiles.exe again today - previous to posting this thread.
    I guess a main question is - what would I be missing out on by not having ACR 6.1 in the profile? (vs 4.6)

  • My camera profiles under camera calibration  (standard, landscape,etc) are missing  since I've updated to 5.6. I have a canon 6d and my computer is a mac. How can I get these profile back?

    My camera profiles (standard, landscape,etc) are missing (under camera calibration) since I've updated to 5.6. I have a canon 6d and my computer is a mac. How can I get this profile back?

    Please upload one of the files to www.dropbox.com and post a public share link in a reply, here.
    Show us a screenshot of the filename in LR that includes the extension of the file.
    Right-click on one of these files and do Show in Explorer, then show us a screenshot of the files in the folder that includes the extensions--maybe a Details view.

  • Cannot install camera profiles in Raw 5.2

    After re-downloading Adobe Raw 5.2 and running the CameraProfiles.exe program and restarting my system I still cannot find any camera profiles under Camera Calibration other than the standard ones in either Lightroom or Camera Raw. I click the dropdown menu in Raw and click Load Settings, but cannot find any camera specific settings. I am running Photoshop CS4 and want to set it up for my new Canon 5D Mark II. Any suggestions?

    [email protected] wrote:
    > After re-downloading Adobe Raw 5.2 and running the CameraProfiles.exe program and restarting my system I still cannot find any camera profiles under Camera Calibration other than the standard ones in either Lightroom or Camera Raw. I click the dropdown menu in Raw and click Load Settings, but cannot find any camera specific settings. I am running Photoshop CS4 and want to set it up for my new Canon 5D Mark II. Any suggestions?
    You are aware that the camera profiles do not have a name the reflect
    what camera they are for? The software populates the list with names
    like "camera faithful" and "camera landscape". These are selected to fit
    what ever camera took the picture and they use the same name for all
    camera models. So if names like above are on the list, then they are the
    correct ones for the camera you used. It is confusing that they are not
    labeled with the camera model.
    John Passaneau

  • Can't see a nikon d800 camera profile in adobe camera raw 8.2

    Hello,
    I can't see a nikon d800 camera profile in adobe camera raw 8.2
    When I open a NEF file from D800, I can see in upper left corner "Camera Raw 8.2 - Nikon D800", but when I open  "camera calibration" and click "camera profile", I can only see "Adobe standard, camera landscape, camera neutral, camera vivid" etc., but there is no "Nikon d800 profie
    I copied .dpx files with that profile to:   C:\Users\User\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\CameraRaw\CameraProfiles     ,but nothing happened.
    Strange thing is that when I open a NEF file from old Nikon D80, in "camera profile" appears: "camera D2X mode1", "camera D2X mode2", "camera D2X mode3". Any ideas?

    The profiles that you see listed are the profiles for the camera that took the photo.  You will not see the camera model listed.  Those are the profiles Adobe created for the camera that took the image.  You cannot change profiles to those of a different camera.
    Apparently older Nikon cameras had the profiles you see listed for your D80.  I have those same profiles of as part of my D90 choices.  But, again apparently, those profiles are not part of newer cameras.  I wouldn't know, because I'm still using a D90.

  • Histogram inconsistencies with Camera profiles - Camera Raw

    Hi,
    I've been going nuts with this issue for a year now since Adobe released the camera profiles for Camera Raw. Something tells me this shouldn't be happening.
    Well exposed pictures taken with the D300 show an inconsistent histogram in camera raw when using the Adobe camera profiles for the D300.
    This is a shame because I prefer the colour rendering of the camera profiles to that of the adobe standard profile.
    This is the problem:
    With the D300 I get a correct histogram in Camera Raw only if I choose the ACR 4.4 or the Adobe Standard profile. By correct I mean with black and white points filled to the edge of the histogram.
    If I choose the camera neutral, standard, portrait or vivid suddenly there's an empty area in the histogram's blacks. Effectively the black point has been shifted quite a bit and I need to push up the slider for blacks up to 30 or so to get the black point back to the right place. While with Adobe standard the blacks are correct at 0 or so. Check out the pics here below.
    Is this normal behaviour, or is there something wrong in my settings?

    Nice pic of brain Bill. Still, I would   take it without any harsh light and rather use longer exposure with  tripod. You can see some sort of light source in left bottom part of  brain. I assume it was a flash gun or above by lamp. Then you may get  much better result ;-)
    Thanks. The shot was taken using the Nikon R1C1 closeup flash unit using the diffusers to help eliminate glare. With such specular sources, one must adjust the light sources carefully to avoid glare, but the only sure way to eliminate the glare is to use crossed polarizing filters. Still, the subject is short scale and one must set the white and black points.
    Now, to discuss your posted shots. If anything, your posts confirm my initial assertion, since you are correcting post processing and not by changing exposure in the camera. The corrected images are from the same raw expsosures with postprocessing. By the way, if you post your screen shots as PNG, you will eliminate the artifacts around the text.
    I put some links of  images to explain my point since we still talk about something else.  (cannot insert pics via adobe).
    http://hajes.org/img/acr/cairngorn.jpg
    Brilliant example of screwed up "I have  been there" photography. Exposed not very well and at worst light  possible. Must go there once again and fix my incompetence.
    http://hajes.org/img/acr/cairngorn2.jpg
    Cairngorn is short scale because of atmospheric haze. There is no way to correct that with in camera exposure, but you could have exposed more to the right. Nonetheless, you have captured the whole dynamic range of the scene and exposing to the right would only improve the signal:noise. You had to use the exposure and black slider to set the white and black points, which only confirms what I said in my previious posts.
    somehow "fixed" previous image. just for  fun and learn PS CS4.
    http://hajes.org/img/acr/hrad.jpg
    overexposed image at first glance by  untrained eye.
    Hrad is a high dynamic range scene with blown highlights. Your use of the exposure control to bring down the highlights darkens the rest of the image to an undesirable degree. It would have been better to use recovery to tame the highlights. A better approach might be to deveolp for the highlights and shadows separtely and merge the results as shown below. Again the correction is in postprocessing. There would be no way to do that with a camera exposure. The use of +1EV in ACR in HRAD3 only worsens the highlight clipping.
    http://imagingpro.wordpress.com/2008/12/03/expanding-the-dynamic-range-of-a-single-raw-fil e/
    http://hajes.org/img/acr/hrad2.jpg
    same image with 1EV extra without of any  detail loss. miracle of digital sensors.
    http://hajes.org/img/acr/hrad3.jpg
    final image. it is just for web, so no  bother about burned sky...
    http://hajes.org/img/acr/tunka.jpg
    again, overexposed image at first glance  by  untrained eye. we don't care about clipped shell in the left middle  of image. it is not main interest of pic...
    http://hajes.org/img/acr/tunka2.jpg
    ..and we again get 0.50EV extra which  corrects clipping.
    I don't see any evidence of overexposure. The highlights are well short of clipping and the shot is grossly underexposed--not exposed sufficiently to the right. Nonetheless, the full dynamic range of the short scale scene has been captured and the shadows are well above clipping.
    In case some will wonder  about weird setting of ACR. It is just for web and I still don't know  all tricks of PS. Furthermore, I prefer to spend time in nature rather  than in front of computer.
    The settings of ACR are indeed wierd. Thomas Knoll recommends setting the highlights with the expsoure slider and the midtones with brightness. An alternative way of doing this, introduced with Lightroom, would be to set the midtones with exposure and control the highlights with recovery. A black point setting would likely be required as well. Again, no way to do that with an in camera expsoure, validating my previous assertion.

  • Camera Profiles in LR 5.4 missing

    When trying to use VSCO film presets today, I've decided to check Camera Profile inside Camera Calibration in Lightroom. To my surprise profile would never change whenever I applied a new preset. It consistently showed Adobe Standard profile. In the drop-down menu the only profiles that show are the default: Adobe Standard, Camera Faithful, Camera Landscape, Camera Neutral, Camera Portrait, Camera Standard.
    I made sure I'm working on RAW files.
    I remember that a moth ago I was still able to see the entire huge list of VSCO camera profiles in that drop-down menu.
    The Presets menu continues to show presets correctly as before.
    I've checked and all those Camera Profiles (.dcp files) are as before located in /Username/Library/Application Support/Adobe/CameraRaw/CameraProfiles
    Also a few of my XRite Passport calibration profiles located in that folder do not show in LR.
    I even tried moving them to the main /Library/Application Support/Adobe/CameraRaw/CameraProfiles, but it didn't fix the problem.
    In a couple of forums I've read that downloading and installing the newest Adobe DNG Converter 8.4 can reset some of the index files, but it didn't work for me.
    I'd be grateful for any suggestions!
    I'm using:
    OSX 10.9.3
    LR 5.4 CreativeCloud
    Canon 5D Mark III

    These profiles are in my main Library directory (non-user specific) inside Mac/Library/Application Support/Adobe/CameraRaw/CameraProfiles/Camera in individual camera specific folders. They appear to belong to the default selection of camera profile inside LR - I did not install those. They do not appear inside LR application though. LR metadata in the library module recognizes my camera as it should, but is not loading 5DmkIII specific profiles.
    Here are troubleshooting steps I've performed on those profiles from the default folder (not the VSCO profiles!):
    1 - Moved Canon 5DmkIII profiles from Mac/Library/Application Support/Adobe/CameraRaw/CameraProfiles/Camera/Canon EOS 5D Mark III  folder to Mac/Library/Application Support/Adobe/CameraRaw/CameraProfiles - didn't help
    2 - Moved Canon 5DmkIII profiles from Mac/Library/Application Support/Adobe/CameraRaw/CameraProfiles/Camera/Canon EOS 5D Mark III to rafaelswit/Library/Application Support/Adobe/CameraRaw/CameraProfiles - didn't help either
    This is how it looks in the default path. SamsungSSD is my main drive where OSX and all applications are installed.

  • Setting Camera Profile question

    Canon 40D in Lightroom 2.3
    While reading the FAQ I noted the statement for the Canon settings:
    In general, there are 5 CM profiles per Canon DSLR, one for each of the default Canon Picture Styles. These five Picture Styles are called Standard, Portrait, Landscape, Neutral, and Faithful. The CM profiles will match the Canon Picture Styles with all Canon sliders (i.e., Contrast, Color Balance, and Saturation) set to their default values of 0.
    What if the Standard style does NOT have the default setting to value of 0?
    If the styles should be at value 0 for Lightroom to apply the profile then the words should say exactly that.
    My other query is if including several ISO settings when preparing the specific camera profile.
    If the image that is open while preparing the profile and settings to be saved as a camera profile has an ISO 200 then when are other ISO ratings included in the camera profile?
    Is the camera profile updated by opening another image with an ISO 400 entering any specific adjustment settings then do the update the camera profile? This routine to be repeated for any other IS0 rating.
    The detail of adding these ISO ratings to the camera profile are not specificied at the site I visited
    http://www.computer-darkroom.com/lr_camera/camera-defaults.htm
    nor do I see it in the FAQ
    Appreciate any clarification.
    Rose

    >What if the Standard style does NOT have the default setting to value of 0?
    I guess you are referring to the sliders in Lightroom. The text in that FAQ refers to the settings in your camera that override the picture styles. The sliders in Lightroom need to be at their default settings. Those are NOT zero for a lot of the sliders. The default is 5 for blacks, 25 for contrast, 50 for brightness and the tone curve at medium contrast. Everyting else should be at zero. Using these default settings and a camera-matching profile will yield you a rendering that mimics the in-camera jpeg with the same picture style, provided you do not modify the settings in your camera.
    >If the image that is open while preparing the profile and settings to be saved as a camera profile has an ISO 200 then when are other ISO ratings included in the camera profile?
    The profiles are ISO independent. The color rendering is independent of the ISO of your camera so there is no need for separate camera profiles at different ISOs. To generate a camera profile, you only need to shoot a single image (actually usually two, one in daylight and one in tungsten light) preferably at the lowest ISO so that noise does not screw up the calibration. There are other things automatically taken care of in Lightroom depending on ISO such as baseline noise reduction.
    >The detail of adding these ISO ratings to the camera profile are not specificied at the site I visited http://www.computer-darkroom.com/lr_camera/camera-defaults.htm
    nor do I see it in the FAQ
    This page talks about camera defaults. This is something completely different from the camera profile. Camera defaults are simply default Develop settings dependent on which camera your RAW file came off off. These default settings can include the application of a camera matching profile and the defaults can be ISO dependent.

Maybe you are looking for