Splitting HR server for payroll posting ALE

Hi all
I want to setup 2 Payroll posting ALEs from 2 different HR servers to a single FI server. I would like to know if this is possible?
I know that you can have 2 separate FI systems and filter the ALE according to the company codes and send it form one HR system. But I can’t find any documentation on splitting the HR server and sending the IDocs to a single FI server.
Any documentation or suggestions will be appreciated.  
Thank you.

Dont' forget to activate your exit function by clicking on it (in transaction CMOD) and clic on 'activate'
The project created in cmod is equal to a swith which says "use" or "don't use" the user exit. Tha's why it is not called while an activated project does not exists !

Similar Messages

  • IdocType, Message Type & Process code for Payroll Posting

    Hi Gurus,
    In My Project, the SAP HCM is Maintained as a separate instance and rest such as FI/CO resides in ECC ERP. Now We need to Interface the HCM Instance with ECC ERP, where FI/CO resides to post Payroll Results. Hence I am writing a Technical Specs for ALE interface between SAP HCM and ECC ERP. I came to know that a standard ALE is existing for this purpose and I hereby need its Idoc type, Message Type and Process code for the same.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Vinoth Kumar.R

    Guys
    I could not use above message type/idoc type as they are not released in SAP.
      So i am again back to where i have come from. I am trying to use DESADV01 and Mess Type DESADV.
    Regards
    Srikanth M

  • How to generate Payroll Posting

    Hi All
      I’m facing problem in generating payroll posting IDoc to send to FI System. Payroll was run for all employees in a payroll Area. I released the document, but still the payroll posting IDoc is not generated when we look using WE02.
    Hope I have done all the ALE configuration setting which we did for other message Type (E.g. Cost Center, GL Account..Etc) such as defining Logical Name, RFC Connectivity, port, Partner Profile and Distributed the message type between two systems
    Please help me what are the remaining steps to complete, or which program do I need to execute in background to generate payroll posting IDoc
    We are using <b>“HRPAYP”</b> message type for payroll posting.
    Please guide me..
    ..Babu.K

    Babu,
    Payroll posting is run by folloiwng menu in SAP
    SAP Menu->Human Resources->Payroll->India->Subsequent activities->Per Payroll Period->Posting to accounting
               Or
    Transaction code: PC00_M99_CIPE
    You don’t have to give employee number here, give document date.
    First run in Simulation(select type of document creation as 'S'), the simulation mode run ensures that the posting document created does not have any errors. These errors can be viewd in the log, log should have the node Doc. creation as 'Error Free', then only you're all set to go with live posting. Live posting(select type of document creation as 'P') can be run only after the Payroll is in Exit mode.
    After the live posting is over, you need to release the document , this you can do by clicking on 'Document Overview' push button, then select the document and click on the second button from left to release.After the release you need to post the document, by clicking on the second button from left again. Hope this helps.
    Regards
    Ramakrishna Ramadurgam

  • Override Company and Cost Center for FI Posting from HR Payroll

    Hello all. I have this scenario with a company that was merged into another and retroactive payroll occurs for absences and extra time in the "old" company, but the "old" merged company is closed so no postings can occur.
    I also found this unanswered post:  How to Override Company and Cost Center for FI Posting from HR Payroll
    We suppose that retroactive differences could be accounted in the new company code but I didnu2019t found any way to do it even in the BADI SMOD_PCPO0001 I couldnu2019t find a way to change the company code/cost center....
    Does anyone have dealt with the same problem? What is the solution?

    Amosha, thank you for your response.  Here is PCP0 that shows what I mean by 'header company code' that I don't see how to change (I re-ran pd 26 2008--bi-weekly payroll, btw):
    06/30/2009 Posting Document
    Run                      0000002791
    Company Code    0057
    Document            0000008174
    PostingCurrency  USD
    Reference           HRPAY00009
    Doc. Type            ZB
    Run Type             PP
    Posting Date        12/01/2008
    Documant Type   G/L Account Document   
    Document Date    06/30/2009
    Bus. Transaction HRP1
        There are error messages for this document
    Account Number with Text
    21301000   Accrued Salaries & Wages   CCTR 14515      ...
    20303998   HR P/R Doc Split                                               ...
    Messages for Document 000008174
    Error in document: HRPAY 0000008174
    The CO account assignment object belongs to company code 0001, not 0057
    Company code 0057 is now closed and has been merged into 0001.  Cost center 14515 in the above doc was populated by my clone of RPCIPE00 and call to my BAdI which retrieved current company and cost center from PA0001.  You can see from above that the 'header' data still shows 0057 and indeed, my version of RPCIPE00 only changes P_ITEM-BUKRS, P_ITEM-KOSTL and P_ITEM-SGTXT.  It looks to me that fm HRPP_TRANSLATE_FICO gets the 'header' company code afresh.  I was planning to leave WPBP-BUKRS (and all other Payroll data) alone (ie, not override company code).
    As for your other question, we post retros to /551 and /552. 
    Thanks again.

  • To Generate Payroll posting data to FI in XSD format in a server location

    Hi Experts,
                     I have a requirement where i need to generate the payroll posting data in XSD format. The sender system is using ECC5.0 and receiver system is using ECC6.0 . I thought of using the ALE scenario and i have know idea how to create an XSD file in a ALE IDOC scenario. your help is much appreciated.
    Thanks
    Vishnu.

    Hi Karan,
    I got the error message "Run PP 0000000123 cannot be deleted" when I was trying to delete posted Run number.
    Is it any way to delete those posted Run numbers (payroll posting numbers) in table PCALAC? The data was copied to development server last time.
    Thanks.

  • Posting for payroll-Mid Year Go Live

    Dear Friends,
    We are going live in Payroll on August.I have some clarifications regarding the leagacy data upload, kindly calrify
    1.After uploading Data from April 2008 to July 2008 , if i run payroll thru INLK schema, do i need to do Payroll FI posting for each month from april to July, is it necessary.
    2.when running past payroll , should i need to run payroll separately for April, May , June, July or can i run all the 4 months payroll at once after updating table T558B & T558c.
    3.Any other prerquisites to be considered before or uploading legacy data.
    Experts plz advice.
    Rgd,
    Sekar.

    Hi Shekar,
    After uploding those two tables u have to run the payroll for all the months seperatly by using INLK schema.
    But make sure that u have uploaded the technical wage types also like PF, ESI, PT, IT etc.
    Payroll posting not required.
    SAP HCM

  • Business Area for Vendor Line Items during Payroll Posting

    Dear All
    We are in ECC 6 version of SAP. We are using Business Area for Internal Financial Statement. We are facing a problem with regard to Business area in Payroll posting. Business area does not appear in vendor line items when we make posting of payroll for multiple business area. We have setting technical accounts for HR. We read SAP note 203276 and it seems that it is possible. Can someone tell us what is the reason that business area not coming in vendor line item while payroll posting.

    Hi
    That part we have already done. The problem only come when we run payroll and there are vendors belonging to several business area in that case system keep the business area field blank. In case if we set field status required system give error. That is why we run payroll by each business area we also have maintained technical account for 1001.
    Regards

  • Generate Posting Date for Payroll Periods"

    Hi all,
    What is the relevance of "Generate Posting Date for Payroll Periods" ?
    table T549S
    Rx

    Posting Date is required after payroll run and exited then we have to post payroll results to accounts.After payroll run which date we have to post to accounts. Source is 01 payday...target 04 posting date....for ex If payday is 30th every month.....then posting date is after X days .....like you have to generate postinfg dates.
    Mohan

  • Error-Payroll Posting

    Hi,
    I am not able to do the payroll posting all my, G/L's are well assigned to the Symbolics & SYMB's are assigned to the wage Types Hi,
    CAn anybody plz guide me about these SYM Acc's & their assignments.
    Whether it is correct or Work.Please guide.
    /3E1 Ee ESI contribution 1 - 5008 F EE ESI Contri
    /3E2 Er ESI contribution 1 + 5009 C ER ESI Contri 1
    /3E2 Er ESI contribution 2 - 5008 F EE ESI Contri
    /3F1 Ee PF contribution 1 - 5010 F EE PF Contri
    /3F2 Ee VPF contribution 1 - 5012 F EE VPF Contri
    /3F3 Er PF contribution 1 + 5011 C ER PF Contri
    /3F3 Er PF contribution 2 - 5010 F EE PF Contri
    /3F4 Er Pension contribution 1 + 5014 C ER Pension Contri
    /3F4 Er Pension contribution 2 - 5012 F EE VPF Contri
    /3F7 EDLI contri * 1,00,000 1 + 5022 C EDLI
    /3F8 EDLI adm chrgs * 1,00,000 1 + 5023 C EDLI Admin
    /3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,000 1 + 5017 C ER PF Admin
    But after running payroll i am not able to run the posting as its not clearing the balance & when i check the Posting Error Log.
    Employee Gross Salary Per Month is 8200.Take home-7041,Dedeuction-799.
    00000007 0,00 6.451.734,00 INR
    32 01 2011 0,00 6.451.734,00 INR
    Expense account 0,00 6.453.070,00 INR
    Balance sheet account 0,00 1.336,00- INR
    SymAc 5009 - . ER ESI Contri 1 0,00 390,00 INR
    CCtr 0,00 390,00 INR
    Wage Type A /3E2 Er ESI contribution 0,00 390,00 INR
    SymAc 5011 - . ER PF Contri 0,00 147,00 INR
    CCtr 0,00 147,00 INR
    Wage Type A /3F3 Er PF contribution 0,00 147,00 INR
    SymAc 5014 - . ER Social Contri to be pa 0,00 333,00 INR
    CCtr 0,00 333,00 INR
    Wage Type A /3F4 Er Pension contribution 0,00 333,00 INR
    SymAc 5017 - . ER PF Social contribution 0,00 4.400.000,00 INR
    CCtr 0,00 4.400.000,00 INR
    Wage Type A /3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,000 0,00 4.400.000,00 INR
    SymAc 5018 - . ER Pension Basis 0,00 4.000,00 INR
    CCtr 0,00 4.000,00 INR
    Wage Type A /3FC Pension Basis for Er cont 0,00 4.000,00 INR
    SymAc 5022 - . EDLI Life insurance to be 0,00 2.000.000,00 INR
    CCtr 0,00 2.000.000,00 INR
    SymAc 5023 - . ER ADMIN contribution acc 0,00 40.000,00 INR
    CCtr 0,00 40.000,00 INR
    Wage Type A /3F8 EDLI adm chrgs * 1,00,000 0,00 40.000,00 INR
    Balance sheet account 0,00 1.336,00- INR
    SymAc 5008 - . EE ESI Contri 0,00 534,00- INR
    Wage Type A /3E1 Ee ESI contribution 0,00 144,00- INR
    Wage Type A /3E2 Er ESI contribution 0,00 390,00- INR
    SymAc 5010 - . EE PF Contri 0,00 627,00- INR
    Wage Type A /3F1 Ee PF contribution 0,00 480,00- INR
    Wage Type A /3F3 Er PF contribution 0,00 147,00- INR
    SymAc 5015 - . EE PTax Contri 0,00 175,00- INR
    Wage Type A /3P1 Prof Tax - split period 0,00 175,00- INR

    Raj,
    you have to make small corrections in your symbolic a/c configuration and WT characteristics also.
    Wrong mapping below:
    /3F4 Er Pension contribution 1 + 5014 C ER Pension Contri
    /3F4 Er Pension contribution 2 - 5012 F EE VPF Contri
    /3F7 EDLI contri * 1,00,000 1 + 5022 C EDLI
    /3F8 EDLI adm chrgs * 1,00,000 1 + 5023 C EDLI Admin
    /3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,000 1 + 5017 C ER PF Admin
    Correct mapping below:
    /3F4 Er Pension *contribution 1 -  5014 C ER Pension Contri*
    /3F4 Er Pension *contribution 2 + 5011 C ER PF Contri*
    /3F7 EDLI contri * 1,00,000 1 + 5022 C EDLI
    */3F7 EDLI contri * 1,00,000 1 - ???? F EDLI*
    /3F8 EDLI adm chrgs * 1,00,000 1 + 5023 C EDLI Admin
    */3F8 EDLI adm chrgs * 1,00,000 1 - ???? F EDLI Admin*
    /3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,000 1 + 5017 C ER PF Admin
    */3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,000 1 - ???? F ER PF Admin*
    Normally Pension contribution is a part of Er PF so it shud deduct from Er PF from GL where you have mapped with VPF, so you have a problem here and also pension a/cs both should in expence a/c rather one is B/S and another is expence.
    Check above steps properly as mentioned for the correction and rest all config mapping is correct which you did.
    I hope after doing above change your posting should run.
    lemme know if any more doubts.
    All the best.
    Regards,
    TATA

  • Office Web Apps server for Lync DNS question

    We are going to deploy an Office Web Apps server for our Lync 2013 clients, available internally and externally. We do not have a split-horizon DNS so it is not possible for wac.foo.com to have a different IP for internal vs. external clients. What is the
    best setup for our scenario? It looks like we can only add one address in the Lync topology builder, so would it make sense to send everybody to the external wac.foo.com regardless of whether they are internal vs. external? Or is there a better option?
    Thanks,
    Matt

    It might be easiest to use pin-point DNS.  Create an internal zone called wac.foo.com with a blank A record that points to the internal IP address of the OWAS/WAC server.  This way, wac.foo.com will resolve to the correct
    internal address, but you're not setting up a split zone for the rest of foo.com.
    This trick can come in handy for publishing other items without recreating the entire zone, it's a nice one to keep in your back pocket.
    Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question please click "Mark As Answer".
    SWC Unified Communications

  • Payroll Posting to multiple Company Codes in FI and CO possible?

    Dear experts,
    I need your help on the following challenging issue with respect to payroll posting to accounting.
    Is it possible for a payroll that runs in one company code for all employees, to post to FI and CO for multiple CoCds?
    Example:
    WT 1234 exists in HR CoCd 1000 (assume an amount of u20AC 100 in the payroll results)
    G/L ABC exists in FI CoCd 1000
    G/L DEF exists in FI CoCd 2000
    CCtr xyz exists in CO CoCd 1000 (which is the employee's master cost centre)
    CCtr uvw exists in CO CoCd 2000
    The wage type should be mapped as follows:
    + 100 to G/L ABC and CCtr xyz (this is no problem, is realized with standard mapping)
    - 100 to G/L DEF and CCtr uvw
    The challenge is in the fact that the credit amount should go to another company code than the debit amount.
    How can I realize this?
    Thanks in advance for your feedback!
    Jeroen

    This is from SAP documentation:
    Cross-company code transactions are characterized by the fact that payables are assigned to a company code other than the one in which the corresponding expenses arose. This results in receivables and payables between company codes.
    If you want to post these receivables and payables to company code clearing accounts, you must make the settings in several steps, as outlined in the following.
    Note that in the case of separate HR/AC systems, posting to company code clearing accounts can only be implemented if the AC system is in Release 4.5A or higher.
    For more information on cross-company code transactions and business considerations, refer to the SAP Library under Payroll -> country -> Subsequent Activities -> Posting to Accounting -> Special Business Requirements for Posting -> Cross-Company Code Transactions.
    Settings for Posting to Company Code Clearing Accounts
    1. In the step Define Symbolic Accounts, you must assign an account determination type to each symbolic account in Human Resources. For specific postings to balance sheet accounts, the account assign types FL and FO are used. From a technical viewpoint, these account assignments are defined as follows:
    Wage types that are assigned to a symbolic account with account assignment type FL are posted in accordance with the information from the last period in the WPBP table (Work Center Basic Pay) for the current original result.
    Wage types that are assigned to a symbolic account with account assignment type FO are only used for posting in the evaluation of a current original result.
    2. In the step Define Posting Characteristics of Wage Types, you must assign the symbolic accounts with the account assignment types FL and FO to the corresponding wage types:
    You assign the symbolic accounts with account assignment type FL to wage types that, in the case of retroactive accounting, contain the difference between old and new payment amounts. In countries that use the principle of origin, this usually involves wage types /551 Recalculation difference and /552 Subsequent clearing from previous month.
    You assign symbolic accounts with the account assignment type FO to wage types that contain payments to employees and whose amounts do not change in the case of retroactive accounting. This usually involves wage types /557 Cash payment, /558 Payment of balance, /559 Transfer and other, country-specific wage types.
    3. In the step Create Posting Variants, you must set the Post to company-code clearing account indicator for the variants that you use. Otherwise, payables and receivables between company codes are not posted to company code clearing accounts, and remain as the balance on the document split account for the company codes affected.

  • SAP HR Technical Accounts related to payroll posting.

    Hi experts,
    I have a doubt in Assign Technical Accounts related to payroll posting.
    Menu Path IMG -> Payroll SG -> Reporting for Posting Payroll Results to Accounting -> Activities in the AC System -> Assigning Accounts -> Assign Technical Accounts
    Account key    Account (GL)
    1001               1307090
    *1307090 Clearing Account.
    My doubts are
    u2022     If I am maintaining a GL account as clearing account, is it applicable for the entire wage types across company codes?(As this config is not based on Co code,but based on Chart of accounts)
    u2022     Where these account keys we will be assigned in HR side to wage types / no need to assign?
    Regards
    Thomas

    Hi,
    My issue is not solved yet.
    I have tried that option now documents are splitting and there is no error in document creation, but now its a different  issue  of amt in that GL acc.
    My scenario is we are creating a new company code.So group of employees I need to move from one company to another.
    But their previous month claim needs to be posted in the old cost centre.
    Means when I am running Jan payroll (period 1), December claims which is created in Jan should processed and two documents has to be created. u2013Its is done now.-No issues.
    But now the new GL code (not assigned to any symbolic account) which is assigned for splitting ,in  the technical account is not displaying in the posting document.
    Example:-IT0015 record with origin as 15.Dec.2010, but created in Jan..
    In my document it is taking as       
    GL related to wage type u201C/552 Stat.net post u201C- as debit in period 1 Jan document .
    and
    GL related to wage type   u201C9xxx- staff out patient claimu201D u2013as debit in period 13 Dec document .
    Now question is what is the relevance of the GL given in the technical accounts, as nothing is posted in to that account?
    Edited by: Thomas Padiyara on Dec 3, 2010 11:17 AM
    Edited by: Thomas Padiyara on Dec 4, 2010 3:53 AM

  • Number of Line Items Issue at the time of Payroll posting

    Dear All,
    While creating a posting document (Payroll posting) for FI, the maximum number of line item allowed is 999 where as I have 1464 line items. I am creating only one document based on Company code and it is giving me the following error, which is because of number of line item;
    Acct determination not defined for trans. HRA 1002  in chart of accts AGCA
    Message no. F5113
    Diagnosis
    An automatic posting cannot be created because the account determination for transaction HRA with keys 1002  is not defined in chart of accounts AGCA.
    System Response
    The document cannot be posted.
    Procedure
    Depending on the type of processing, you can hold the document and post it later. If this is not possible and the error cannot be eliminated straightaway in customizing, you must leave processing and enter the document later.
    Procedure for the system administrator
    Correct the account determination for the specified transaction. Proceed
    Please tell me how to create least amount of documents for posting?
    Regards.

    SPRO> payroll >Reporting posting payroll result to Accoutning > Activities in Account system >Assigning Accounts >Assign Technical accounts
    Here eneter 1001 payroll clearing account and next enter 1002 same payroll clearing account. by doing this it will allow document splitting.

  • G/L accounts amount spliting in payroll posting

    Hi to all,
    We are getting a different problem in payroll posting side.
    G/l accounts balance are spliting into debit and credit, why is it happening like this?
    Inputs: i have seen payroll RT table, there is no wage type or amounts split in payroll. it is happening to only basic elements.
    like i am getting 10,000 - basic, conveyance -2000, variable -3000
    the above amount are going to debit(DR) column, again above the half amount to going to credit(Cr) column like 5000,1000,1500.
    but in dev, quality client it is not happening, in production client only it is happening.  We have cross checked the all screens, but we are not able to find the exact error.
    What might be the problem. Awaiting for your valuable replies.
    Regards
    Devi

    Hi,
    Exactly, you are correct.
    But we changed cost center in the month starting date. like we are in May month, but we changed the cost center in the month April 01.
    and also we are getting following error.
    Field WBS Elem. is a required field for G/L account.
    Description of error:
    Field WBS Elem. is a required field for G/L account 1100 401001
    Message no. F5808
    Diagnosis
    The value for field "WBS Elem." in the interface to Financial Accounting is an initial value but you are required to make an entry in the field selection for G/L account "xxxxxx" in company code "xxxx" linked to the field selection for posting key "50".
    System Response
    Error
    Procedure
    It might be an error in the configuration of the G/L account field selection. The initial application, used to call up the interface must otherwise define a value for field "WBS Elem.". If this is the case, contact the consultant responsible for the application used to call up the interface or get in contact with SAP directly.
    Pls suggest me.
    Regards
    Devi

  • CREMDM splitted by PI, ADRMAS gets posted, CREMAS in inbound queue

    Hi all,
    I am on SAP MDM 7.1 SP03, SAP PI and SAP ECC6.
    I have gone thorugh all the threads and Guides related to MDM but couldn't find a valid solution for my problem described below. However, I did find some tricks and tweaking which I dont want to use as they are not recommended by SAP.
    We syndicated NEW Vendor records being created in MDM using CREMDM with standard Syndication Map. We have Vendors number generated in MDM and the number range being used exists in ECC and is marked as external. Moreover, the number range uses all of 10 digits, so there is no question of Conversion Routines with it. We deployed PI for splitting CREMDM to ADRMAS and CREMAS. We have serialized ADRMAS to go before CREMAS. We have assured that fields common between these two, have "no data" character i.e. "/" in CREMAS with correct data in ADRMAS. And ADDR_GROUP is mapped as "BP".
    Now the problem is, ADRMAS gets posted but CREMAS remains in the inbound queue. The queue running but still CREMAS remains there with CODE as "75". This results in non-creation od Vendor master record as CREMAS is not posted.
    Can anybody help with this. I really appreciate the support.

    Hi R,
    The ALE inbound function modules treat each IDoc segment as a current set of data. Missing fields (or fields that have no data) are interpreted as a value deletion. To keep the existing value for a single field, you have to add a no-data sign as field value for NAME_1. This no-data sign is a single slash (/).
    Please execute the inbound function module manually in WE19 to test this. If an exception is seen at NAME_1 ,pass a value or '/' and check for successful posting of Idoc.
    If this works, modify inputs to CREMAS accordingly.
    In addition a good SAP Note 1052964 - MDM: Distribution of Business Partners, Customers, Vendors for your reference.
    Regards,
    Vinay M.S

Maybe you are looking for