Splitting not happening correctly to activity types -KSII

Hi ,
As part of month end closing process we have run the assesment (KSU5) and there after the cost has been allocated to the cost centers .
One cost center 1015090 gets all the cost from assesment ie all cost on that cost center is secondary .
When i am trying to run KSII i am getting the following error message
"Cost center CTR 1000/1015090, cost element 680100: Splitting is not possible
Message no. KD302
Pls advise.

Hello,
I believe these notes can help:
418445 Error message KD302 seems unjustified
772794 -> explains the splitting steps
Also helpful:
Splitting is not possible.: Message no. KD302
Error message KD302
Regards,
Lucas

Similar Messages

Forecast splitting not working correctly

Hello
I have a problem with the forecast splitting not working correctly. We are using 2M->W     2 MONTH IN WEEKS     0 GLEI and most of the time this appears to work fine but there are occasions where the forecast is split for May, did not split Jun but split July.
E.g.
06.05.2008     IndReq     VSF               9,424-
12.05.2008     IndReq     VSF               20,845-
19.05.2008     IndReq     VSF               30,925-
27.05.2008     IndReq     VSF               24,740-
02.06.2008     IndReq     VSF               134,257-
01.07.2008     IndReq     VSF               25,771-
07.07.2008     IndReq     VSF               32,213-
14.07.2008     IndReq     VSF               32,214-
21.07.2008     IndReq     VSF               32,213-
28.07.2008     IndReq     VSF               25,770-
Do any of you Guru's have any idea why this would happen?
Many thanks
Sue

I checked it in MD67
it is working fine.
In MD61 - my demand is 800 each for June and July. it hjas splited as below
system is dividing the total qty on daily basis and then multiplying by no days in that week covered by requirement
W 22.2008             26.667
W 23.2008            186.667
W 24.2008            186.666
W 25.2008            186.667
W 26.2008            186.667
W 27.2008             26.666
W 27.2008            154.839
W 28.2008            180.645
W 29.2008            180.646
W 30.2008            180.645
W 31.2008            103.225

Document splitting not happening in New G/L

Hi
I have done all the below settings for document splitting.But still document splitting is not happening for vendor.For example,I am posting the following entry.
Using FB60 Tcode
Cr Vendor 100
Dr G/L       60   (cost center 1)&(Profit center 1)
Dr G/L       40   (cost center 2)&(profit center 2)
when simulating I am expecting vendor entry also to be split and shown as
Cr Vendor 60 (profit center 1)
cr vendor 40 (profit center 2)
Dr   G/L    60
Dr   G/L   40.
But it is not spliiting Vendor.It is showing vendor as 100 but splitting the 60&40 to the ZERO balance clearing account( as configured in ZERO balance clearing account step.)
why is vendor split not happening/Is there any thing I am missing?
Config steps done are as below.
The Steps to follow are:
1. Classify G/L Accounts for Document Splitting
2. Classify Document Types for Document Splitting
3. Define Zero-Balance Clearing Account 4. Define Document Splitting Characteristics for General Ledger Accounting
5.. Activate Document Splitting
thanks

Hi thanks all.
Sorry,I am new to new G/L concept and document splitting.Can you please check my following settings and confirm if they are fine.(I am doing in plain IDES system).
1.Financial accounting(new)>G/L accounting (new)>Business transaction>Document splitting>classify G/L Accounts for document splitting>>
I have classified G/L Expenses accounts which I am using under tcode FB60(for simulation of document splitting) with category as 20000 u2013expense.Also I have given Vendor reconciliation account under category 01000-balance sheet account?
Please clarify how the G/L accounts classified here?
2. Financial accounting(new)>G/L accounting (new)>Business transaction>Document splitting> Classify FI document types for splitting.
Many standard documents are defined.But I thought since I am using FB60 tcode it used doc type KR so mentioned mentioned transaction as 0300 and variant as 0001 -Vendor invoice
3. Financial accounting(new)>G/L accounting (new)>Business transaction>Document splitting>>Define ZERO balance clearing account
Here standard system has account key 000(standard account for ZERO balance) with PK40/50 and G/L account for my chart of accounts is mentioned.
4. Financial accounting(new)>G/L accounting (new)>Business transaction>Document splitting >>Define splitting characters for G/Lu2019s
Here I have mentioned Profit center field (ZERO balance ticked)&mandatory field ticked.no other fields defined.
5. Financial accounting(new)>G/L accounting (new)>Business transaction>Document splitting >>Edit constants for non assigned processes
Here I have added my controlling area and left profit center field as blank.
Please check above settings and suggest me if I am missing any thing?All I am trying to do is post a simple test entry using FB60 and show the document splitting based on just profit center.
regards

Document splitting during fb60 not happening even its activated

we are making a simple entry
expense dr    6000     proft center 1
expense dr   4000      profit center 2
vendor   cr   10000
after we post our document what we should get is
expense   dr     6000     profit center 1
expense   dr     4000     profit center 2
            vendor     cr     6000    profit center 1
            vendor     cr     4000    profit cente   2
but its not happening
when we simulated this doc splitted document we get
expense   dr     6000     profit center 1
expense   dr     4000     profit center 2
            vendor     cr     6000    profit center 1
            vendor     cr     4000    profit cente   1
our configuration for doc splitt is
        parameters                           value
1    ref   transaction                      bkpf
2.   splitting method                     0000000012
3    B. transac                             0300
4.   B.trans variable                    0001
5.   derv via doc type                   KR
6   comp code                            2600
7   zero bal method                     p
where is the problem or the error due to which it is not picking up the correct profit center or correct segment while splitting up the document.

where to check for authorisation?
secondly where we have activated in doc splitting we have ticked everything
doc splitting
inheritance and std acc asignment and for constant we have filled zabc which contains business area and segment and no profit center and segment contains 9999 as default profitcenter.

Primary cost component split not happening

Hello Experts,
I am trying to create a Primary cost component split for Products with following settings
1. Creation of Primary cost component structure "1N" and marking it as Primary cost component
2. Assigning the Primary cost elements to the Cost component structure
3. Assigning the Primary cost component structure for the Company code and Plant
4. Assigning the Primary cost component structure to "Version" under "Price calculation" tab.
5. Activity type with Activity type category "1- Manual entry, Manual allocation" and Price Indicator "1 - Plan price, automatically based on activity"
6. Activity output planning for Cost center
7. Primary cost planning for the Cost centers
8. Activity price calculation. (Update run) - Prices are changed in KP26 also
9. After all the above steps I checked report S_ALR_87013644, Plan price is existing in the report as mentioned in SAP note: 1658589
After all the above steps, I tried running Cost estimate for a product. I am getting the error message
Cost element 90001 is not assigned to a cost component
Message no. CK239
Also, I am getting a message
No structure could be determined for internal activity TEB (M0001)
Message no. CK694
Therefore the Cost component is showing only the Material component.
Where "90001" is a secondary cost element. I am not sure why system is still searching for Secondary cost element where we have assigned Primary cost component structure. I also ensured that Primary cost elements used in planning are all assigned to a Component in Cost component structure.
I checked for SAP note "1736332", which is not applicable for my system version. Current version of SAP_APPL is Release 606 and Support package SAPKH60607.
Please help. Am I missing any settings.
Thank you in advance.
Muneer Ahamed N

Hi Muneer,
Please check whether you have maintained cost center splitting structure properly and assigned to the respective cost center for which you have maintained output planning and input planning.
This splitting structure is much required because there only we maintain the relationship between primary cost elements and activities.
Coming to your first message, yes system expects maintenance of secondary cost elements also in the cost component structure which is not primary CCS.
Inorder to show primary cost component structure view:
First, system calculates the direct activity cost in terms of secondary cost elements...
Next, it verifies the cost center splitting structure you made,
Then, system is going to convert the direct activity cost in terms of primary cost elements based on the splitting structure and Finally displays the primary cost component view
I suppose second message speaking about cost center splitting structure only, please go through it carefully
Other than these whatever the process you specified is right only..
Regards...
Jose

Document Splitting not happening

Dear Friends,
I have done the configuration required for Document Spitting.
When i post a document with expenses and tax from two cost centres which has two different profit centres then according to principle of document spliting the tax amount for which i dont give any cost object should get split proportionately into two profit centres. but....
this split is not happenning in GL view but when i see the tables related to document splitting the values are split proportionately and stored in the respective tables. but not reflecting in GL view.
Can any one tell me what could be the reason for this...
I appreciate your timely response...
Thanks and regards
SAP user

Dear All,
Thank you very much for your timely response...
I have maintained document number range in FAGL_DOCNR. The document type is IF for non-leading ledger.
My doubt is
1. should i maintain IF in leading ledger also and maintain number range in FBN1.
2. Should i classify IF document for Document splitting.
Thanks in advance.
Sap user

Dealer's ECP payment not happening correctly in Biller Direct

Here the problem is Sometimes Dealer's ECP payment made in Biller Direct is more than Dealer authorized. Also more than the 'Confirmation of payment' from BD
OR
sometimes its not happening at all.
Do you have any idea on this.
I got a mail from client which says
"There is an example in the production environment which the customer selects to refund a credit memo, and it's now stuck in the "In Process" status."
how can i check this example???

thanks its done

Basic Pay Split not happening for Mid Month Joining

Hi Gurus,
I am facing a problem running a payroll where the employee who is hired at the middle of the month the net pay should be half. But in my case the employee is getting a full month pay.
I have Hired an employee on 20th of February.
Planned working Time Status "0" No time Evaluation
My Payroll Area is Monthly
The Payroll Period is 25th to 24th of next month
Pay date is 27th
I am running payroll on 24th Feb the RT displays the net payable amount for the full month instead of 5 days Payment which is from 20 Feb to 24 feb.
I have set the start dates in the following infotypes 0000, 0001, 0002, 0007, 0008 as Start Date: 20th February current year.
I have assigned all my wage types the following Processing class:
PRCL 1 Specification 3 WType included in valuation basis /001 and /002
PRCL 10 Specification 1 Reduction with factor /801
And PRCL 30 and 41 also are assigned appropriate specifications.
Please guide how can I do it.
Best Regards,
KPJ

Thanks Surisetti I resolved myself..if you could throw some light as the amount is not being calculated exactly..
The month has working hrs 192.
the amount in /001= 66 and /002=52
The base salary is 10000 SAR
and the TSSOLL= 39.5 for days from 20 Feb to 24 Feb
So, Amount will be calculated /001 mutilply TSSOLL i.e (66 X 39.5)or
/002 Mutiply 39.5 i.e (52 X 39.5)
How would that be calculated...
In general when base is 10000 SAR and monthly working hrs are 192
10000 Divide by 192 is equal to 52 which is exactly equal to /002
and now worked hrs in period 20 feb to 24 feb are 39.5
So, basic should be (52 X 39.5)= 2,057 SAR
The amount calculated in system is different ...could u please throw some light why its not calculating exact amount to be paid..
Thanks & Regards,
KPJ

Batch split not happening during delivery

Hi Experts,
I have enough of stock for a material with different batches (with different expiry dates). When I create an order for qty 100, system confirms it on a certain date taking 1st batch nearest to expiry date, as per the search startegy set in the cponfiguration.Please note here that the batch that system picks has got only 50 qty in stock, but it shows whole 100 qty against it. Probably because Batch split is not possible during sales order creation, hence system showing whole qty against one batch.
Now, when I try to create delivery, it shows only 50 qty of the same batch in delivery document. I select the line item and go to the "Batch split" tab to effect batch split, but system does not allow. It says "Batch already specified for material".Here is the detail for your analysis-
Batch in item 000010 already specified for material 2000978
Message no. VL221
Diagnosis
The batch was either predefined in the sales order that the delivery is based on or it was assigned to the delivery item manually. Therefore, you can no longer carry out a batch split for the delivery quantity of the items.
Procedure
In order to make the batch split possible, you can cancel the assignment of the delivery item to the batch, if the delivery's processing status allows.
Kindly advise.
Thanks in advance,
Randhir

Thanks Mr. P Gomatheeswaran,
Now batch is not being determined during sales order creation, that's fine.While creating delivery,when I select line item and go to Batch split tab I can see batches being split in two, which is OK. But when I try to put Picking quantity as delivery qty, system says "Picked quantity is larger than the qty to be delivered".(Message no. VL019).
Also Storage location field is grayed out.
Regards,
Randhir

Document Splitting not happening (only for one profit center 1000)

Hi,
The Bank GL account 13000010 is assigned a default Profit center 1110.
After Posting an entry,
ENTRY VIEW SHOWS
Bank AC       CR.........                                             10000                                     (since default PC is 1110 )
          Vendor A/c             DR                                                                      10000              Profit center 1000
whereas the same in GENERAL LEDGER VIEW shows
Bank AC       CR.........                                             10000                                      Profit center 1110
          Vendor A/c             DR                                                                      10000              Profit center 1110       * * * *
It does not take already defined zero balance clearing account into consideration, and gives the above GL view output
This is not the case with any other Profit centers i give in Vendor line item (The progfit center in case of vendor line item is derived from Cost Center Master Data)
Also, If i post the same entry, giving Debit effect first,
ENTRY VIEW
Vendor A/c             DR                                                        10000              Profit center 1000
               Bank AC       CR.........                                                      10000                                     (since default PC is 1110 )
GENERAL LEDGER VIEW IS AS FOLLOWS:
Vendor A/c             DR                                                        10000                         Profit center 1000
               Bank AC       CR.........                                           10000                         Profit Center 1110
Zero Balance Clearing a/c DR                                             10000                         Profit center 1000
              Zero Balance Clearing a/c CR                               10000                         Profit Center 1110
Here, It is taking Zero Balance Clearing account into consideration.
Please assist on the same...........

Dear
Since default profit center 1110 is defined in fagl3keh system has taken correctly profit center as default profit center as 1110. I could not understand how you can put profit center in vendor debit. Since bank credit default profit center is 1110 naturally vendor debit is taken from the default profit center 1110 and vendor debit is also posted to profit center 1110 and not 1000. Please check once again. I think there is no difference if vendor is either posted first or second. If you need to have debit as profit center as 1000 then you may have to choose bank account pertaining to profit center 1000.
Regards

Error Activity type 502000 not set up for cost center 1000 cc111

hi all
While creating a work center (CR01) I need to enter a cost center and activity type for machine hours. However, while entering the activity type the following message appears:
Message no. CR 061
You are attempting to assign activity type XXXX to the work center. However, this activity type has not yet been set up in controlling area 1000 for cost center xxxxx.
while creating the activity type in KL01 i have already given * in cc category so it should go for all cc
What could cause this problem?
Thank you in advance,
Kind regards

Hi,
Check whether the activity type is maintained at the correct controlling area via KL03. If not, then create the activity type (KL01) in the corresponding controlling area.
Regards,
Darrel

Configuration needed for setting revaluation of activity type rates

Hi,
I'm not sure about the obligatory settings I should make in order to configure revaluation of activity type rates.
I know that I have to set sth in Plan version and that I have to fill the Activity Type master data in a different way than if I used them without revaluation.
Can you tell me about the settings I should make?
Thanks and regards,
Karol

Hi Karol
Yes u r right u need to first set in plan version and after that its the client's discipline on transaction entry that drives this requirement.
1) If the transaction data is not posted correctly then activity hours will be vague and distorts the price.
2) You can do manual activity posting but that does solve the purpose.
3) Also u can correct activity hours posted for all orders in the system during month end, this also is a huge activity depending on the number of orders
4) Now if u wish to do price calculation thru system u need to decide on two aspects
One - plan ur costs for both activity dependent and activity independent
If your cost center has more than one activity being performed u need to do either cost splitting or enter equivalence numbers while doing activity planning
5) If u wish to hve prices calcualted by system, then during month end u need to run actual cost splitting and then do actual price calculation
6) Then u need to revaluate all your orders with actual activity prices
Hope the above clarifies - do assign points as a way to say thanks

Activity type int processing activity

Dear All
I have creat activity type & assign this activity type to work center in "ActTypeProc." IN KP26 , i maintain activity price & all other things but when i maintain this activity type & work center in WBS for respective internal activity system not shown me plan cost as well as when i confirm the activity system not shown me actual cost also. Pl gave some input on this
Regards

Hi nivruti,
check ur work center whether u have put formula sap008 in other formula in capacity tab page. in schedulling tab page formula sap004 . check whether in costing tab page ur entries are correct regarding activity type and cost center.
In activity type put * in cctr catagory , activity type catagory 1, give secondary cost element (this can b a reason of ur problem) in allocation cost element.
Apart from this also check costing variant whether actual and planned has been maintained properly or not.
Regards
Abhishek Sinha
Idhasoft, India

Activity type and CAT2

Hi friends,
my client have employee who had activity type for 2009 (ACS001) and we planned this activity type with cost center(2114200001) in kp26.
Belong 2010 year this person should not post in this activity type(ACS001), but other person with different cost centers can post in this activity type. So we not planning there cost center in kp26.
But the problem is when person create mistake and post in cat2 for this activity type(ACS001) some hours for 2010.
The system create only warn messages 'No activity prices exist for 2114200001/ACS001'.
When employee push enter the system accept record.
So i think that we have several decision:
1.With user rights to restrict activity type(ACS001).
2. Create new analysis period for ACS001. Now this period is from 01.2005 to 12.2999year.
and split in to periods 1 period 01.2005 - 12.2009 and 2 period from 01.2010 to 12.2999.
3.Create validation in HR
4.Change messages type BK - 057 from warn to error. Here i think that is impossible.
So how what type of decisions is better, and flexible?

HI,
2 possibilities:
1: OBA5 change message control, you can set this message to "ERROR" on SAP-user level.
2: If the combination of cost center 2114200001 and act. typa ACS001should not be used anymore in FY 2010 create a new validity interval for both masterdata and use the field "cost center category" in cost center master data / activity type master data to "unlink" cost center / act. type.
best regards, Christian

When Syndication does not happen

Hello
Although I checked everything I could regarding the Port's configuration and Syndicator (Mapping, eligible records), the syndication does not happen.
The processing type is Automatic and processing interval hourly. The console does not get updated with the next syndication time.
Any ideas about what else should I be verifying ???
thank you in advance
Luciana.

Hello Ravi,
I re-created the ports for both repositories and it seems ok now. The processing date and time are being updated by the system now.
Question : Do we need to re-start the server when we do changes to the ports ?
I used to do this in the past because my changes never seemed to be saved by the system.
thank you

Splitting not happening correctly to activity types -KSII

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for