SQL Server Compact 3.5 Merge Replication With SQL Server 2012 - Causing IIS App Pool to Crash

Hi, I may be the only person in the world doing this but I wanted to give this information to anyone else who may follow this path in the future, and hopefully avoid a headache, or at least a paid support call to Microsoft.
My original scenario was we had a SQL Server 2008 Server using Merge Replication through and IIS (web server) to several Windows Mobile 6 devices. This has worked fairly well for a few years.
Recently we upgraded our SQL server to version 2012 SP 1. After moving the database over to the new server, and re-setting the merge replication stuff, we couldn't get merge replication to work on the Windows Mobile 6 handheld devices. The replication
would appear to start, and then we would get a message saying that the device could not get to the web site. The message on the handheld device was this:
"The IIS service is not available."
After doing some more research, we found that the start of the replication process was causing the Thread Pool that was running the SQLCESA35.dll to crash.
The SQLCESALOG.txt file had this information:
Date Time == SQLCESA Version ==> 3.5.8088.0
Date Time Hr=80004005 ERR:Couldn't find existing RSCB 1
After 2 days of trying to figure out the issue on our own, we gave in and called for paid Microsoft support. They eventually found a known issue where a cumulative update was able to fix the problem.
We installed the update on the IIS server and everything ran smoothly again.
FIX: Merge replication fails when you use SQL Server Compact to perform a merge replication that synchronizes changes with a publisher in SQL Server 2012
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2845550
Seth O'Neal

Hi sonealtx,
Glad to hear that the issue is resolved. Thanks for your sharing, other community members could benefit from your solution.
Thanks,
Lydia Zhang
Lydia Zhang
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

Recommended way to start a merge replication with big database

Hi all
I need to install a merge replication on 2 diferent stores with Sql 2012 server, that are connected via 2 mb vpn and the database is about 4gb. due to the fact we have 2mb for the initial sync and the database is big, What is the recommended way to do that
without using the snapshop agent step? Can I take a backup of the db and restore it in the second server and setup the merge replication ? If so, where I tell the wizards that the databases are already there and do not use the snapshop agent and just start
to replicate ?
Thanks in advance.
James

Create the publication and snapshot. Zip up the snapshot and send it via FedEx to the subscriber. Apply the snapshot on the subscriber by pointing to the unzipped snapshot using the altSnapshotFolder parameter of the merge agent.
looking for a book on SQL Server 2008 Administration?
http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-Server-2008-Management-Administration/dp/067233044X looking for a book on SQL Server 2008 Full-Text Search?
http://www.amazon.com/Pro-Full-Text-Search-Server-2008/dp/1430215941

Segmentation fault when enabling replication with SQL API

Hi,
I've compiled BDB 5.3.21 on Ubuntu 11.04 (x86) with the following configure options:
../dist/configure enable-sql enable-sql_compat enable-debug enable-tcl --with-tcl=/usr/lib
I was able to follow the Replication Usage Examples given in "Getting Started with the SQL APIs" to set up a set of replicated master/client databases.
However, after I exited out of the dbsql session that started replication on the master database and re-opened the master database with dbsql, executing "pragma replication_initial_master=ON;" followed by "pragma replication=ON;" led to a segmentation fault. gdb showed that the segmentation fault occurred at:
dbsql> pragma replication=ON;
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0032d42b in __env_ref_get (dbenv=0x8056ad8, countp=0xbfffd498)
at ../src/env/env_region.c:772
772          renv = infop->primary;
(gdb) list
767          REGENV *renv;
768          REGINFO *infop;
769
770          env = dbenv->env;
771          infop = env->reginfo;
772          renv = infop->primary;
773          *countp = renv->refcnt;
774          return (0);
775     }
776
(gdb)
Does anybody know of a solution to this or could this be a bug? Thanks in advance.
P.S. here's a stack trace:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0032d42b in __env_ref_get (dbenv=0x8056ad8, countp=0xbfffd498)
at ../src/env/env_region.c:772
#1 0x001786fc in hasDatabaseConnections (p=0x8056708)
at ../lang/sql/generated/sqlite3.c:44420
#2 0x00178a11 in bdbsqlPragmaStartReplication (pParse=0x80648e0,
pDb=0x80561cc) at ../lang/sql/generated/sqlite3.c:44533
#3 0x001797f5 in bdbsqlPragma (pParse=0x80648e0,
zLeft=0x8062e20 "replication", zRight=0x8062dc0 "ON", iDb=0)
at ../lang/sql/generated/sqlite3.c:44812
#4 0x001c215d in sqlite3Pragma (pParse=0x80648e0, pId1=0x8064b60,
pId2=0x8064b70, pValue=0x8064b90, minusFlag=0)
at ../lang/sql/generated/sqlite3.c:78941
#5 0x001e5c83 in yy_reduce (yypParser=0x8064b20, yyruleno=256)
at ../lang/sql/generated/sqlite3.c:96668
#6 0x001e6761 in sqlite3Parser (yyp=0x8064b20, yymajor=1, yyminor=...,
pParse=0x80648e0) at ../lang/sql/generated/sqlite3.c:97051
#7 0x001e7537 in sqlite3RunParser (pParse=0x80648e0,
zSql=0x80648b8 "pragma replication=ON;", pzErrMsg=0xbfffdba0)
at ../lang/sql/generated/sqlite3.c:97877
#8 0x001c730e in sqlite3Prepare (db=0x8056010,
zSql=0x80648b8 "pragma replication=ON;", nBytes=-1, saveSqlFlag=1,
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
pReprepare=0x0, ppStmt=0xbfffdc8c, pzTail=0xbfffdc88)
at ../lang/sql/generated/sqlite3.c:80736
#9 0x001c7739 in sqlite3LockAndPrepare (db=0x8056010,
zSql=0x80648b8 "pragma replication=ON;", nBytes=-1, saveSqlFlag=1,
pOld=0x0, ppStmt=0xbfffdc8c, pzTail=0xbfffdc88)
at ../lang/sql/generated/sqlite3.c:80828
#10 0x001c7a5e in sqlite3_prepare_v2 (db=0x8056010,
zSql=0x80648b8 "pragma replication=ON;", nBytes=-1, ppStmt=0xbfffdc8c,
pzTail=0xbfffdc88) at ../lang/sql/generated/sqlite3.c:80903
#11 0x0804baf6 in shell_exec (db=0x8056010,
zSql=0x80648b8 "pragma replication=ON;",
xCallback=0x804a3c4 <shell_callback>, pArg=0xbfffde14, pzErrMsg=0xbfffdcfc)
at ../lang/sql/sqlite/src/shell.c:1092
#12 0x0805030e in process_input (p=0xbfffde14, in=0x0)
at ../lang/sql/sqlite/src/shell.c:2515
#13 0x08051453 in main (argc=2, argv=0xbffff3f4)
at ../lang/sql/sqlite/src/shell.c:2946
-Irving
Edited by: snowcrash on Jan 15, 2013 2:16 PM

Thank you for reporting this. I have been able to reproduce this crash in-house.
You need to specify the replication_initial_master and replication pragmas as part of initially creating your SQL database. The replication_initial_master pragma is not used or needed after the initial database creation at the initial master site. The replication=on pragma is a persistent setting that we remember internally the first time you specify it. This means that after specifying replication=on for the first time on a site, we will automatically restart replication for you in future dbsql sessions when we open the underlying Berkeley DB environment.
This gives you a very simple workaround: don't respecify replication=on when you reenter dbsql.
Of course, we shouldn't be crashing on an unnecessary pragma. I have added this to our list of fixes to consider for the future.
Thanks,
Paula Bingham
Oracle

Sql 2008 r2 cluster side by side with sql 2012 cluster on Windows 2008 R2

We have a SQL 2008R2 active/passive SQL cluster running on Windows 2008 R2 cluster.
I would like to add a SQL 2012 clustered instance to the same Winows 2008 R2 cluster.
Are there any issues involved having a SQL 2008 R2 clustered instance running side by side with a SQL 2012 instance in same Windows 2008 R2 cluster?
Are there any pitfalls/"gotchas" to watch for with SQL 2012 cluster install?
Thank you so much!

Hello,
Two instances, one SQL Server 2008 and the other SQL Server 2012, side-by-side, is fully supported.
I would like to recommend you to assign a different port (not port 1433) to the non-default instance
to avoid an IP address conflict between both instances.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Alberto Morillo
SQLCoffee.com

SQL file does not open in Mac with SQL Developer

Hi,
I have my .sql extension files in mac associated with SQL Developer, but when I open the file SQL Developer does not start; nothing happens.
I checked all the associations and it seems correct.
Any suggestion?
Thanks,
A.Tarquino
Edited by: aftarquino on Oct 5, 2010 3:48 PM
Anyone???

Hi Mike,
I can provide solution if you can tell me the registry value(HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\sqlwb.sql.9.0\Shell\Open\Command). I believe there is an extra %1 which is causing this.
Balmukund Lakhani | Please mark solved if I've answered your question, vote for it as helpful to help other user's find a solution quicker
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
My Blog: http://blogs.msdn.com/blakhani
Team Blog: http://blogs.msdn.com/sqlserverfaq
Let me see if I can get my IT guys to temporarily grant me registry access. As I said above, it's locked down, but maybe if I ask
reeeeally nicely :-) I will keep you posted. Thanks!
EDIT: The IT gods have smiled on me. The value for the key above is "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\100\Tools\Binn\VSShell\Common7\IDE\ssms.exe" /dde
Not sure if that helps, but there you go. Thanks!
Mike Loux
Certified Practicing Geek
mike dot loux at gmail dot com
Replying to myself in case in-place edits don't trigger a "somebody updated this thread" email. :-)
Mike Loux
Certified Practicing Geek
mike dot loux at gmail dot com
Hey Mike,
Actually edit didnot trigger the email :)
Change that to
"C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\100\Tools\Binn\VSShell\Common7\IDE\ssms.exe" %1 /dde
(add %1 and that should fix this forever)
Balmukund Lakhani | Please mark solved if I've answered your question, vote for it as helpful to help other user's find a solution quicker
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
My Blog: http://blogs.msdn.com/blakhani
Team Blog: http://blogs.msdn.com/sqlserverfaq

Just resolved Back to my Mac issue called Apple Suppport in the UK and they were really helpful if the error DNS server not responding the problem is with Apple server not your server ( I had tried to reboot by router, restart my laptop etc.

I was having problem with my Back to my Mac as message was saying DNS Server not responding . I tried to turn my WIFI off, then my router to no avail. Decided to call Apple Support line in the UK . I got a call back immediatly and great support. The advisor took over my screen and we check that my laptop was synchronising with I phots and it was. The adviser also told that when the message DNS server is not responding next to Back to my Mac is has to do with Apple Server not mine , router etc... Hope this save others some time! Rather than spending time truining on and off changing IP address etc...

Thanks for your thorough post. I too need to use BTMM on almost a daily basis for my job, and it has fallen short countlness times. I too have taken great pains to check all of the typical trouble shooting steps within iCloud and in the Apple keychain on each Mac etc, but after the latest rounds of system updates from Apple a few weeks ago to Mountain Lion, BTMM on one of my Macs is completely broken and unusable. I would concur that if you need remote access for "real" mission critical use, just bite the bullet and pay for a service like LogMeIn. You won't regret it and you will get real software support.

How to Create a SQL Agent Job For A SSIS Package with Sql Server Authentication

Hi ALl,
I have a SSIS package which basically has a data flow task in which i pull the data from one server and copy it into another server and my source server is the one where i dont have windows authentication and i have to only use a sql server authentication
. This package runs fine if i click the server connection properties type the password and save it.
Now, my task is to set up a sql agent job which basically uses a proxy account and takes this package from the file system and runs it.But when i try to run this package, its failing with an error saying
"Login Failed For rpt5user" where rpt5user is the username for my sql server authentication of the source connection.
Can someone please help me with any suggestions on how to do this?
I have heard that we can achieve it by using xml config file which i have never used and i am trying to google around but for no luck.
So, If someone can please throw any suggestions or ideas on this it would be great.
Thanks

You need to add password as a config item and set it from the file source or sql table
see this as an example
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/runeetv/archive/2009/12/22/ssis-package-using-sql-authentication-and-dontsavesensitive-as-protectionlevel.aspx
Please Mark This As Answer if it solved your issue
Please Mark This As Helpful if it helps to solve your issue
Visakh
My MSDN Page
My Personal Blog
My Facebook Page

Backup Restore With SQL Server 2008 R2 although it succeeded with SQL Server 2008

Dears;
I have a Full backup of some DB of around 417 GB within SQL Server 2008 R2 , and when I tried to restore it , i get stuck several times with the error below :
Restore failed for Server (Microsoft.SqlServer.SmoExtended)
A system assertion check has failed. Check the SQL Server error log for details. Typically, an assertion failure is caused by a software bug or data corruption. To check for database corruption, consider
running DBCC CHECKDB. If you agreed to send dumps to Microsoft during setup, a mini dump will be sent to Microsoft. An update might be available from Microsoft in the latest Service Pack or in a QFE from Technical
Although I have restored
successfully other several Full+ Deferential backups for the same DB while it was in SQL Server 2008 not 2008 R2.
And so I have rounded all different possible assumptions for such common know error by Microsoft for SQL Server 2000, 2005, 2008 but
no way as next:
1-
I have attempted to restore it within 2 environments clustered and non-clustered of SQL Server 2008 R2.
2-
I have attempted to restore verify it and it was so fine .
3-
I have attempted to restore it using Continue_after_error ,no_checksum but no way.
4-
I have attempted to move Backup file to another Storage but no way.
5-
I have scheduled jobs to DBCC
Checkdb the live DB and it wasn’t any errors since long time right now
6-
I have also DBCC check all master +msdb+model+Tempdb ,and they are so fine
7-
I have also checked all I/O subsystem of SAN and Network controllers , but they are fine evidenced much more by my trial on 2 different environments.
8-
I have also checked Memory and it is so fine all the time since I have 128 GB memory and I control it also so well.
For DB Design +Structure :
It has 20 Files containing tables partitioned horizontal +Vertically
(Schema Partitioning +File Stream partitioning ) through these 20 files.
I have Data compression of the required tables only.
I have one table of more than 300 GB alone which is partitioned as mentioned above.
I have implemented Read Committed Snapshot isolation level using row versioning integrated so well with File stream technology since it is a new feature of SQL 2008 R2.
DB is in simple recovery model for garbage collection of all file stream data as a result of much Delete /update in images themselves.
So any one has any idea about such case..How to solve it…?

Hi Ashwin,
When i searched with no answers these are listed out. So i thought this is still existing. Now on wards let me check the data and time of latest reply. Thanks for guidance.
It was happening by oversight. Thanks for guidance.
Regards, Pradyothana DP. Please Mark This As Answer if it solved your issue. Please Mark This As Helpful if it helps to solve your issue. ========================================================== http://www.dbainhouse.blogspot.in/

SQL Server 2008 R2 Standard - Compatibility issues with Windows Server 2012 R2

Hello,
We used as a test a box on which we installed Windows Server 2012 R2 and SQL Server 2008 R2 Standard Edition. No Service pack was installed. It worked perfect.
Now we try to do it on another box and all of the sudden there is compatibility issue when we try to instal SQL Server. We can still install SQL Server by clicking "Continue without getting help".
Where can this come from? If it is hardware related what are the thing I should look at?
Thanks all

Hello,
Adding to Shanky suggestion, you can perform a slipstream installation of SQL Server 2008 R2 + SP3 to make SQL Server
2008 R2 compatible with the newer operating system, as explained on the following post.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/petersad/archive/2011/07/13/how-to-slipstream-sql-server-2008-r2-and-a-sql-server-2008-r2-service-pack-1-sp1.aspx
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/955392/
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Alberto Morillo
SQLCoffee.com

The Active Directory cannot replicate with this server because the time since the last replication with this server has exceeded the tombstone lifetime.

the solution what i got from this from is to Depromote and promote it again to DC, my question when i depromote, will the OU , object will remain as it is or it will be lost. And what precautions do i need to take?
Adding to the above points, my Domain has only 2 DC, should both the DC be demoted and promoted

Under NO curcumstances you demote both of your DCs. You must always have one or 2DCs running, otherwise you will loose your entire AD. Only 1 DC should be demoted. you should wait couple of hours prior to promoting it back to DC role again.
Ideally your primary DC will continue maintaining the OUs, GPOs, and user accounts.
I would suggest brining in a new, 3rd DC intro play, leave it for a day or 2 to replicate everything properly, confirm that its propagating properly with the primary DC, and only then demote and remove the offending DC.
There are actually ways for recovering from tombstone lifetime much painlessly than DC demotion/promotion. Depending on what is your AD running on, Windows 2003 or 2012 R2 servers:
here a few links that might help you understand how it works:
Primary link :http://blogs.technet.com/b/askpfeplat/archive/2012/11/23/fixing-when-your-domain-traveled-back-in-time-the-great-system-time-rollback-to-the-year-2000.aspx
http://community.spiceworks.com/topic/343609-ad-replication-can-t-because-exceeded-tombstone-life
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2020053?wa=wsignin1.0
http://shebangme.blogspot.com/2011/01/active-directory-time-since-last.html

Merge Replication: subscriber database error

Hello
We have a principal application database running on SQL Server 2005, which has 300 GB information.
This database is synchronized with multiple subscribers using merge replication agent, allowing changes at both the publisher and subscribers.
Client applications connect to the subscribers and not the publisher, so the information is loaded in the subscribers.
Last week, one of the subscribers had storage level error (broken discs) that caused corruption in the file system of the server.
Then, the merge replication with this server began to fail due to bad sectors of the file system. But the database remained online, and the application continued to function normally, so new information was loaded in database.
Because disk errors, it was not possible backed up the affected database or copy databases files to save the information. Subscribers regular backups were NOT performed.
After resolving disk errors and repaired the file system, database was restored,
but had consistency errors which were repaired by the DBCC CHECKDB command with
repair_allow_data_loss option.
Comparing the number of records before and after repair, we estimates that some records were lost in the database.
Replication has not been restored yet.
Now we have the following questions:
- What happens with lost data in the subscriber database if the merge synchronization is reactivated? We estimate that the lost data will be replicated to the Publisher, and want to avoid that.
- Is there any way to sync (download) data from the Publisher to the Subscriber to load the missing records again? Avoiding of course the upload from the subscriber to the publisher.
- If the above point is possible, may you then make the upload to the publisher to sync the information loaded into the database subscriber?
- If these actions are not possible, have we another ways to sync the information, to avoid losing data in the subscriber?
Thanks in advance
Javier
Javier Mariani

Hi,
You can configure the Synchronization direction in Article Property. Right-click the Publication, click Properties. In the Articles page, set the properties of the articles. See the image:
Here is a thread for your reference:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/dc21b614-b736-409b-883e-3af6c75ab546/merge-replication-synchronization-direction-as-downloadonly-to-subscriber-allow-subscriber?forum=sqlreplication
Thanks.
Tracy Cai
TechNet Community Support

SQL Server upgrade with merge replication

We are planning to upgrade SQL Server 2005 to SQL Server 2012 and both the databases will be hosted on two different servers. SQL Server 2005 has around 25 merge publication and have around 400 laptops that subscribe to these publications. The new SQL server
2012 will also have same replication setup as the old server. The data base size on the existing server is 66 GB and takes about 1.5 hrs for initial sync up.
Due to various business constraints we can't move over to new server in a single switch. Instead we need to keep both the servers running for a month or two. During this process, we need to replicate (uni-directional) data from SQL server 2005 to SQL server
2012 on a daily basis. To achieve this we have tried the following approaches so far:
DB backup and restore from SQL 2005 to SQL 2012 server - In this approach, the publications are dropped by SQL 2012 after we restore.
SQL native replication - Could not setup Transactional, Merge and Snapshot replication due SQL server constraints. Cannot setup merge replication between SQL 2005(publisher) and SQL 2012(subscriber)
Microsoft Sync framework – Sync fwk expects identify column or primary key for the sync to work but database has 76 tables without any primary key
SSIS – DB consists of 170 tables and will require significant effort to write and maintain the package to sync update and delete operations on the DB. Insert operations on the other hand are easy to support.
We are looking for different options to setup server to server replication with given constraints.

You will need to use some form of change tracking to gather the changes up and replay them on the SQL 2012 server.
You can hack into the msmerge_Contents and msmerge_tombstone to do this. It will be fairly laborious to set up, but it is doable. You can do this as a batch operation so you can run it nightly to do your syncs.
A lower tech way of doing it would be to run tablediff between the two servers and then replay the script nightly.
looking for a book on SQL Server 2008 Administration?
http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-Server-2008-Management-Administration/dp/067233044X looking for a book on SQL Server 2008 Full-Text Search?
http://www.amazon.com/Pro-Full-Text-Search-Server-2008/dp/1430215941

Merge Replication from 2012 SQL Server publisher/distributor to 2014 SQL Express subscriber

Hi, I'm having a question about which version to use when running SQL Merge Replication.
In my test enviroment I have a SQL 2012 server running as Publisher and Distributor for my Merge Replication. I have now set up a test client running Win7 with SQL 2014 Express as a subscriber. The subscription initializes and runs perfectly.
But according to the SQL documentation this should not be possible as it states that the subscriber should have a version number equal or lower than the publisher. My subscription client was set ut using SQL-scripting, if I try using the wizard it will just
cause an error message telling that this is not possible since the client has a newer version number. I still not encountered any problems after I set it up using the script with the sp_addmergepullsubscription and sp_addmergepullsubscription_agent procedures.
The roll-out of my solution will start in a few weeks and I now have to decide whether to use 2014 Express or 2012 Express on the clients. Using 2014 Express will save me for a lot of upgades in a year or two. The 2012 SQL Server running as publisher/distributor
will be upgraded to/replaced with a 2014 Server in some few months.
I'm looking for good advices and recommendations for what to choose on the clients, 2012 Express or 2014 Express. Are the any known problems with using 2014 Express as a subscriber to a publisher/distributor running 2012 SQL Server?
All responses are welcome!
Regards, Anders

Hi,
As you understand that a Subscriber to a merge publication can be any version less than or equal to the Publisher version. When you set up a subscription from a publisher to a subscriber using SQL Server Management Studio, you will get error
“The selected Subscriber does not satisfy the minimum version compatibility level of the selected publication.” And you can use T-SQL script to get around this error message.
I would install SQL Server 2012 Express on the clients. Here is the reasons:
1. If you upgrade the publisher to SQL Server 2014, it is still working with SQL Server 2012 on the subscriber.
2. I cannot tell whether there are other potential problems if I choose the later one besides the error message.
Reference:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143699(v=sql.120).aspx
Thanks.
Tracy Cai
TechNet Community Support

Sharepoint Foundation 2010 compatibility with SQL Server 2014

Due to a requirement to use Sharepoint without Active Directory access. I am trying to find explicit confirmation whether Sharepoint Foundation 2010 is compatible with SQL Server 2014. I have seen that Sharepoint Server 2010 and 2013 are compatible
with SQL Server 2014 as of CU 1 (released in April). But there is no mention of Sharepoint Foundation.
This chart is great except it doesn't mention whether the Foundation versions are supported.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg492257.aspx
Thanks.

Note that that is for the Reporting Services component, but not necessarily for the SQL Database Engine component (which comes from the SharePoint Product Group, rather than the SQL Product Group). I haven't seen any confirmation that SharePoint 2010 is
supported at all with SQL 2014 as a Database Engine.
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
&nbsp&nbsp
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

Add does not run with sql server 2008

Hi all,
My add on in the development environment does not run with SQL SERVER 2008. It ran well with SQL Server 2005 and sap b1 2207 B.
On executing the project file system throws an error "YOU ARE NOT CONNECTED TO THE COMPANY"
we are trying this scenario on a test machine where SAP B1 2007B with temporary license for one month and SQL server 2008
is installed.
Help needed.
Thanking you
Pradnya

Hi Use this
Dim i as integer
i=oCompany.Connect()
if i<> 0 Then
msgbox(ocompany.GetLastErrorDescription ())
end if
the you will get the error description also use try catch wherever necessary
Alternatively you can use
Dim SboGuiApi As SAPbouiCOM.SboGuiApi
Dim sConnectionString As String
Set SboGuiApi = New SAPbouiCOM.SboGuiApi
sConnectionString = Command
SboGuiApi.Connect sConnectionString
Set SBO_Application = SboGuiApi.GetApplication()
Set ocompany = New SAPbobsCOM.Company 'initialate DI company object
ocompany = SBO_Application.Company.GetDICompany
HTH,
Atul

SQL Server Compact 3.5 Merge Replication With SQL Server 2012 - Causing IIS App Pool to Crash

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for