SRM - condition types of central contract not copied to ERP (CentContract)

Hi,
When I add several condition types to a contract in SRM (updating). After releasing the condition types are not updated in the contract in ERP.
How can I resolve this. Is there an OSS note?
Regards,
Alexander

condition types are copied from SRM to ECC

Similar Messages

  • Condition types from Central Contract not copied into Purchase Order

    Hi,
    When creating a central contract from SRM to ECC, all the condition types are copied well.
    But when creating a shopping cart from SRM or a PO in ECC referencing the created central contract, the condtion types are not displayed in the conditions tab. (Only Condtion type PB00 is displayed.).
    What can I do to assure, that all the condition types from the contract are displayed in the PO.
    Do I have to do some customizing, or is there a SAP Notes to resolve this.
    Regards,
    Alexander

    Dear Poster,
    As no response has been provided to the thread in some time I must assume the issue is resolved, if the question is still valid please create a new thread rephrasing the query and providing as much data as possible to promote response from the community.
    Best Regards,
    SDN SRM Moderation Team

  • Service line condition type KR01 from PR not copied to contract

    Dear gurus,
    I created a service PR. I put in the Gross Price and Header Discount (KR01) at the service line in the PR. When I create a contract with reference to that PR, the Gross Price is copied over but not the Header Discount (KR01). Why is this not happening ?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    please read the following notes:
    FAQ note 499722 and question 13 and
    note   358028.
    Only the price, no surcharges / discounts should be copied into the contract.
    Regards,
    Edit

  • Condition type & tax code & does not exist

    Hi,
    I have a problem to find out the reason why i can not process documents which came via IDocs from Sales SAP system. The error is "Condition type & tax code & does not exist". Following places i have already checked :
    1. FTXP - tax code for which error exists the same in both systems
    2. Table A053 - Condition types for specific tax codes and country are created in both systems.
    The tax determination is under billing and in Sales system it is ok, document is posted and when comes to our FInance system via Idoc it is in error even we have the same entries in the table A053.
    Maybe someone knows what can be also checked ?
    Thanks
    Tomek

    Hi Tomasz,
    Please go to T.code WE02 and check the reason for the error.
    The failed IDocs will be in status "51" and will also give you the reason for errors.
    Regards,
    Shiv

  • IDoc error - Condition type & tax code & does not exist

    Hi,
    I have the problem with CANADA tax codes. I have a few documents sent from external SAP to different SAP. In the source system documents were posted. In the target system i have error "Condition type & tax code & does not exist". I have compared the tables A003 and A053 in both systems and the settings are the same for specific Condition type and tax code... So where to find the reason Idocs are in error ? The only thing which is different is validity from (in the source system is earlier than in the target but the docs are created after both validation start)...
    I would appreciate advice.
    Tomek

    Hi Tomasz,
    Please go to T.code WE02 and check the reason for the error.
    The failed IDocs will be in status "51" and will also give you the reason for errors.
    Regards,
    Shiv

  • Condition types for Import Vendor not getting in Contract

    Hi,
    In Contract Document if Import Vendor selected, for the Line items we are not getting the Import Pricing Condition types. Instead, we are getting the Local pricing condition types even if Import vendor schema maintained in Vendor Master.
    We have found that Gross Price PB00 and PBXX are maintained for both Local and Import Pricing Procedures. In PB00 condition type configuration, Local Pricing Procedure is assigned in the field Pricing Procedure (V_T685A-KALSM).
    But while creating the Purchase Order we are not facing this problem & we are getting respective Pricing Condition types based on the Vendor schema assigned in Vendor Master. And already till now more than 4 Lakhs of Purchase Order created.
    Please let me know the solution to get Import Pricing Condition types in Contract for the line items.
    Thanks & regards,
    Datta

    In Contract only basic price will be shown, other conditions and pricing procedure do not appear, becayse eventually the contract has to be released, which is nothing but creating a PO.
    SAP Standard practice, Outline agreements (Contract and Scheduling areement) will not have pricing procedures, they will have only basic price and discounts conditons.
    Hope this anwers your question.
    Thanks & regards
    Hameed Parvez.

  • VPRS Condition Type in SERVICE CONTRACT

    Hi Guru's
    while entering the service contract for billing,,, Condition Type VPRS is not Coming.we are trying for this since 2 days.can u plz clarify me,it would be a great help.
    Regards
    Sap Guru

    hai,
    As per my knowledge VPRS condition type will bring price from Material Master.It is an internal condition type. Did you mean VPRS condition type to bring the cost to service contract? I am not clear on it. If you explain little brief, i will check up.
    govind.

  • MWST condition type missing in contract creation,VA41

    Hi, got a problem here during contract creation. I can't get the MWST show up in the contract condition tab. Analysis result :
    010 Access not made (requirement not fulfilled)
    Error Message : Pricing error: Mandatory condition MWST is missing
    Things I have done :
    a) checked pricing procedure V/08
    b) created condition records VK11
    c) checked customer tax classification : Liable for taxes
    d) checked material tax data : Full tax
    e) ???
    what else did I miss out?
    Thanks
    Andy

    Option 1: If you do not want MWST condition as mandatory, then remove the check from check box in the pricing procedure (T.Code: V/08). MWST is tax condition & Tax condition are normally not mandatory, as it may vary according to Business Requirement.
    Option 2: <b>"010 Access not made (requirement not fulfilled)"</b>: Check the access sequence maintained for Condition Type MWST (T.Code": V/06). Next, Check the Access Sequence & the access 010 assigned to it. (T.Code:V/07). Check whether Accesses & fields are assigned correctly.
    Option 3: Instead of maintaining condition record for access 010, maintain for different combination & check the result. Even in my case, once the access with reference to tax classification did not give desired result, but was achieved bu maintaining another combination.
    Regards,
    Rajesh Banka
    Reward points if helpful.

  • SRM 4.0: Source of Supplier not copying in line item on Shopping Cart

    We are using SRM 4.0 in an extended classic setup and currently experiencing a problem with the source of supplier not being copied on line items. The user stated that  when copying a line items in a shopping cart the source of supplier is not copying to the new line.  It happens sometimes but not everytime the client uses the line copy option.
    It was initially thought that based on the amount of the line item (>=$25,000) that would cause the source of supplier (vendor) not to copy to the new line item but it has been verified by client that is not the case.  If anyone has seen this issue and know of what the root cause could be please let me know.
    Thanks

    Yann,
    Actually this is occurring when the user is creating a shopping cart from scratch.  He added a line item either from catalog or free text, sources the item and then uses the copy function to copy the line item.  When the client does this the item is copied but the vendor disappears from the 2nd line item and client has to add it again. 
    So that OSS notes doesn't apply unless I'm missing something.

  • CIN condition type J1CV and JCDB not appearing in PO history

    The 2 above mentioned condition types are appearing in PO conditions tab.
    however, after GR was posted, the amount from J1CV and JCDB condition types was not showing up in the PO history tab.
    and these 2 condition types did not have their statistic box ticked so by right it should be appearing.
    however there's no problem with other condition types like JCV1, JECV, JEDB...etc
    anyone can advice?

    Hi,
    Condition types J1CV and JCDB are stand for what pricing conditions?
    There may be any causes for above.
    Option-1----- >JCDB (IN Basic customs) is used for Basic Custom duty and this may be added to inventory account of material, so no separate entry in GR document.
    Option-2----- >May be J1CV and JCDB (IN Basic customs) condition types have no value and during PO creation, this condition types may be deleted.
    Option-3----- > Check J1CV and JCDB (IN Basic customs) condition types are there in MM Calculation Schema.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Condition type for charges in not working

    Dear All.
    We have created a facility using MM and for this facility, we need to pay the yearly facility agency fee based on the total credit line. To achieve this, we have a condition type (1208) under 'charges' tab in the facility transaction. And from the 'cash flow' tab, we can see that we need to pay the facility for 5 years. After 2 years of paying the facility agency fee, we were told by our user that we do not need to pay the remaining 3 years the facility agency fee. They want to remove this facility agency fee from appearing in their cash flow & treasury transaction.
    How do I achieve this?
    FYI
    I tried to create another condition (same with the earlier condition - (1208)) which effective from 3rd year with lower amount but instead of overriding the the first condition, it is adding another facility agency fee in the 'cash flow' tab.
    I tried to create another condition (same with the earlier condition - (1208)) which effective from 3rd year with zero condition but the earlier condition still remain.
    I also tried to change/delete the earlier condtion but not allowed to change/delete - greyed out.
    Looks like the effective date in the condition is not working. Can anyone share any notes (I've gone thru some in OSS - but could find related note for the time being) or how to change the condition?
    Appreciate your advise. Thanks.
    Regards
    Fauzi

    Hi Fauzi
    I can think of two possible reasons why you are not able to edit the existing charge:
    1. In Field selection "SETTLEMENT-CHANGE", function "003 Activity change", the "Tabstrip: Charges" (field group 70) is set
    to "Display" (or others).
    I'll put the path to field selection in SPRO for your quick reference:
    Financial Supply Chain Management
    ->Treasury and Risk Management
      ->Transaction Manager
        ->General Settings
          ->Transaction Management
            ->Define Field Selection
    2. The charge in the facility might be blocked for changes because there are other flows posted or because the money market deals which the facility is attached to have posted flows in the same period.
    Please check those two points. I hope this helps you solve the issue.
    Regards,
    M Trein

  • When creating PO in ECC central contract not displayed automatically

    Hi,
    I'm testing if the central Contracts are displayed automatically when creating a PO (ME21N). The contract has been created in SRM. In ECC the contract is saved in table CC_DB_VIEW.
    Is it possible that the contract is automatically assigned to the PO, when entering the vendor and material. For PIR this works fine.
    Regards,
    Alexander

    Hi,
    Create Contract Release Order Thru ME25.
    Follow the steps from this document:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/75/ee0f4d55c811d189900000e8322d00/content.htm
    Reetesh
    Edited by: Reetesh Tiwary on Nov 17, 2011 3:52 PM

  • Shipping conditions in Contracts not copied over to sales order w/ref

    In standard SAP the shipping conditions are pulled in from the Sold-to party's customer master unless the shipping conditions are hard coded in the sales order type, in which case they overrule the shipping conditions of the sold-to.
    A client enters contracts (CQ) with their customers and creates sales orders with reference to these contracts. The shipping conditions within these contracts are different from those on the Sold-to master record. The client wants the shipping conditions from the contract to flow through to the sales orders created with reference to the contract (instead of the system currently getting them from the sold-to). I do not believe this is standard functionality but I want to be absolutely sure before I respond to the client and tell them that we will have to create a custom routine in copy control to achieve this from the contract.
    Other than tweaking copy control routines is there any way the system can be configured so that the shipping conditions from the Contract (CQ) header get pulled in when a sales order is created with reference to the CQ contract?
    Any help/suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    SJ

    Hi,
    Whatever be the shipping conditions in contracts that can be flow to sales order,
    Please check your input, if you mentioned in sales document then remove from there - VOV8
    Also check in copy controll - VTAA
    CQ  to OR  at header level
    Copy requirement - 001
    Tickmark to complete refrance
    Kapil

  • SRM 7.0 EhP 1 central contracts with service lines

    Hi,
    I have a question concerning the use of SRM 7.0 EhP1 central contracts with service line items. I know that for SRM EhP 1 you would require EhP 5 in ECC. However, since my organisation just went to EhP 4 last weekend I am wondering if there's any option to use services in central contracts without going to EhP 5 in ECC.
    Kind regards,
    Bastiaan

    Hi Laurent,
    Yes.
    When Central contract was designed in SRM 7.0 with ERP EhP4, it was designed with no service hierarchy. But in SRM 7.01 Central contral was enhanced to handle service hierarchy and it works with ERP EhP5. The problem is when we have SRM 7.01 and ERP EhP4. To handle this complication SRM 7.01 was designed to send flat service lines to EhP4 and lower release even though Central contract in SRM has service hierarchy. So while transfering to ERP EhP4 system in standard, all outlines are not consider for transfer and only service lines (Functional items) are transferred to ERP. To do so user needs to maintain the backend destination information of the connected backend system in table BBP_BACKEND_DEST via SM30 transaction with correct system type (for EhP4 system it will be ERP_4.0 and for EhP5 ERP_5.0). SAP Standard program checks this while XML generation for transfer and if system type is ERP_4.0 system it removes all outlines from temp table before generating the XML data. When it is done, ERP has only service lines in its XML and it does the manupulation to create the replication of central contract.
    Master Guide (Including Upgrade Information) - SAP SRM 7.01 states:
    "The use of SAP NetWeaver PI is optional but it is required for outbound XML-based messaging or for connecting non-SAP planning or execution systems."
    So service hierarchy is possible in SRM 7.01 and ECC 6.04 but only with PI. For other CCM functionalities, SRM 7.01 and ECC 6.04 without PI works fine.
    Best regards,
    Christian Zeuch

  • Pricing: New condition type not getting listed in options in product master

    Hi,
    I have created a new pricing procedure and also created a new condition type for it. I am trying to create a condition record in the product master for this  condition type but the condition is not there in the list of conditions. How can I inlcude it in the condition list?
    Even the new condition type I have created by copying 0PR0 is not getting listed in the options, whereas 0PR0 is getting listed.
    Regards,
    Meenakshi
    Edited by: Meenakshi Sawhney on Sep 9, 2010 8:27 AM
    Edited by: Meenakshi Sawhney on Sep 9, 2010 8:29 AM

    Hi Meenakshi,
    you need to enhance the condition maintenance group in the customizing, which is assigned to the product master. Please check: IMG: Customer Relationship Management -> Master Data -> Products -> Special Settings for Sales Operations -> Assign Condition Group to Application CRM and IMG: Customer Relationship Management -> Master Data -> Conditions and Condition Technique -> Condition Technique: Basics -> Create Maintenance Group.
    Best Regards,
    Michael

Maybe you are looking for