-- SSD as scratch

It's almost 2012...has anything changed with the do's and dont's of using a SSD drive as your scratch?
Last I checked, the best configuration was a SSD for your OS/system and a RAID of some identical HDDs for your video/audio/photos, etc. And it wasn't good to use the SSD as scratch because the read/write suffered over time and the drive depreciated and you needed to reformat it to bring it back to life.
Still true?
Thank you.

As far as, I know there shouldn't be any problems with this. The drives have improved quite a bit. Apple has been shipping them as main system drives in the MacBook Airs for quite some time. Your system disk does a lot of read writing for virtual memory, and so far, I haven't heard of any issues.

Similar Messages

SSD as Scratch Disc, SLC or MLC SSD?

hello
i am using a external 512 GB SSD (crucial m4 MLC-SSD) as photoshop cs6 and cc scratch disc and it runs well, i guess.
i get round 390/300 MB/sec read/write speeds over usb 3.0 in my imac 27" late 2013.
as i want to buy a second 500 GB SSD, would photoshop team or people who know detailed technical aspects about
MLC and SLC SSDs go for a SLC or MLC SSD?
i heard that SLC SSD´s (enterprise grade) are more suitable for very frequent read/writes regarding the wear level.
purpose: daily work with photoshop cs6 and cc, 8h per day, huge files: 16bit 300dpi 10.000 x 10.000 pixels with 30-50 layers.
i have 32GB RAM but i heard that photoshop cs6 and cc still use the scratch disc permanently even if there is enough ram.
i am constantly watching the read writes on my ssd discs with istatmenus
thanks

i think if i use a thunderbolt ssd scratch disc for photoshop, it has a superior sustained read and write throughput, is that right?
would you use the thunderbolt ssd in my case, or can i go with the usb3 ssd?
in the moment i have a 256GB thunderbolt ssd and a 500GB usb3 SSD (externals) to choose from.
i think my workflow would benefit from choosing the thunderbolt as scratch disc, but how can i find out
if the difference from using the usb3 ssd is just 5 or 10%?

Additional SSD as Scratch Disk?

I have the NEW MacPro which is fast & virtually flawless. I am a photoshop power user (VERY large files), and am thinking that an additional (external) SSD drive dedicated to use as a Photoshop Scratch drive, should be extremely fast, and save wear & tear on the internal drive. SSD's are more than twice as fast as a top Thunderbolt drive. And as a Scratch Disk the low capacity to cost won't be a factor.
Opinions from other PShop power users? Anyone already doing this?
Thanks!

Yes, read up on the tips here:
http://www.macperformanceguide.com
OWC Thunderbay
http://macperformanceguide.com/Thunderbolt-cable-Optical30m.html
http://macperformanceguide.com/Reviews-OWC-Thunderbay4-SSD-RAID0.html
You are not going to 'wear and tear' as SSDs have been tested to hold up with 300TB and still going.
http://techreport.com/review/25889/the-ssd-endurance-experiment-500tb-update

What size for OS/apps SSD and scratch disk SSD ?

Hi !
I need a SSD for my OS with the full CS6 Cloud and few others apps (but no games, pictures, songs or other personnal stuff),
that's mean between 70 and 80Gb. So I think I'll need only a 128Gb for that.
I also need a scratch disk, so despite I prefer a fast and large disk like the Barracuda 3Tb, I read it will be better to take a SSD.
My workstation is a 6x core, with 64Gb RAM, and 6x HDD for projects, render and footage (4K R3D and 1080p PRORES).
My questions are :
1) OS/apps SSD :
Even if I only need 80Gb (or a few more like 90Gb max) of storage, do I need to take more than 128Gb ?
Is it possible that the OS fill my disk with lots of temporary files ?
And the same for Photoshop, Premiere, After Effects or others apps ?
I know those apps will use the scratch disk, but maybe others temporary files will be write on this OS/apps drive ?
2) scratch disk SSD :
Like I said, I prefer larger drives, but as I understood, SSD will be better for preview and temp files,
and actually I'm working with 4K R3D footages and 1080p PRORES.
So do you think 128Gb will be enough for a scratch disk, to use with CS6, Blackmagic Resolve, and others 3D apps, like Maya ?
Of course I can empty them regularly.............. but is it enough ? Or 256Gb, or higher will be better ?
Or just a fast WD Velociraptor 1Tb or even a cheaper Barracuda 3Tb hard drive will be good enough ?
Thanks guys.

Thanks for your fast reply.
But, I'm confused.... if the OS and the apps can fill my disk with lots of temp files, how a 128Gb can be enough ??
Maybe you mean that those apps will fill the SSD with "hidden" files, but not reach the limit of 128Gb ?
About Windows, I didn't knew I could make a scratch disk only for this temp files.
Do I have to put the Windows temp files in the scratch disk also ?
And you don't think a Velociraptor with 1Tb will be a good solution between the speed of a SSD and the size of a HDD ?
My drives (alone or in RAID 0) are directly connected from the motherboard P9X79 PRO, trought the X79 chipset, and the Marvell chipset.
But I read that the Marvell chipset has only 500Mb/s in total bandwitch divided between the 2 drives..... I'm not really sure....
but even if it's true, I don't think the OS/apps will take a lot of bandwitch (except when I'll start an apps),
and it will surelly let the full bandwitch for the scratch disk. Don't you think ?
4 drives are connected to the X79 chipset :
- 1x SATA 6Gb/s - Barracuda 3Tb (projects)
- 1x SATA 6Gb/s - Barracuda 3Tb (renders)
- 2x SATA 3Gb/s / RAID 0 - Barracuda 3Tb (footages)
- 2x SATA 3Gb/s / RAID 0 - Barracuda 3Tb (footages)
2 drives will be connected to the Marvell chipset :
- 1x SATA 6Gb/s - SSD (OS/apps)
- 1x SATA 6Gb/s - SSD or HDD (scratch disk for CS6 and other "video" apps)

Ssd for scratch

I hope everyone had a great Thanksgiving, there was an earlier discussion that I can't find about SSD drives for scratch can significantly reduce the life of the drive. Is that still true, is this a marginal effect or a real concern?
thanks!

thanks for the reply, I'm just bouncing around some ideas for a MacBook Pro.
I definitely wouldn't need this for serious editing, just for a quick offsite fix. The heat issue is potentially a problem since the space isn't designed for the additional drive although the optical drive would probably create some heat. I was considering replacing the optical drive with a data doubler from OWC with an SSD or 2nd drive for scratch.
any additional thoughts would be great. I think my bigger problem is going to be working around Thunderbolt and the lack of IO solutions, I'd much rather have an express card slot, USB3.0 and/or eSata.
regards,

Photoshop CS6 scratch disk on hard drive or SSD?

I've purchased a Windows 7 PC with 16 MB RAM, 2 terabytes and a 250 GB SSD. I'm going to load Photoshop on the SSD and the OS on the hard drive. Where should the scratch disk go?

It's a bit tough to answer, as you have not described how you'll be using your system overall. Are you going to be doing almost exclusively Photoshop work with it or are you looking for good all-around performance?
What brand and model SSD is it that you have, specifically? Generally speaking, if it's a modern model SSD with wear-leveling features in its internal controller, and with the other givens you mentioned, you will probably want to use the SSD for scratch, as SSD throughput is very high (hundreds of megabytes per second). With SSD throughput levels, when Photoshop starts using its scratch space heavily the performance hit is much less severe than with an HDD. There is also not nearly as much concern with an SSD about dedicating the drive to the task, as even if there are other activities on the drive the near-zero latency means that SSD supports multitasking much better.
However, if you feel you'll never exceed 250GB for OS and applications (i.e., you're going to keep a relatively simple system), using the SSD for operating system and apps alike might be a better approach. In that case there won't be enough space also for Photoshop scratch.
Just keep in mind, when planning your "this goes here, that goes there" distribution that Windows and its apps are really most comfortable with EVERYTHING running on drive C:. That's not to say it's a necessity, just that things tend to work more smoothly in that setup. Given that, you might actually consider getting a second SSD and making a RAID 0 array for drive C: with plenty of space available. That's the approach I took (in my case with four SSDs).
-Noel

Clear RAM/temp files on system SSD disk

Hi!
6 months ago I installed OS X 10.8.5 on a faster SSD disk on my Mac Pro from 2008. PhotoShop and other heavy applications became much faster with the new flash drive, initially. Now, it's even slower than before, for some reason. Can I clear RAM cash, temp files or something?
On this 120 GB disk I've only installed the operative system along with applications. It seems to me that I have temporary files taking up space or something because the memory scan shows 76.83% of memory being used for "other" stuff than photos and apps. (se attached images)
I keep all files that I work on, on a different disk. In other words, the SSD disk should not be running out of memory like this - right?
Happy for any help with this!
Cheers!
Angela

CS6 uses the boot disk for scratch and can put 100's of GB on there if there is room, and can cause trouble and overload the SSD.
So yes you need to find another location for scratch.
PCIe lets you leave your drive bays as they are and allow you to add two SSDs that will run faster and not impact performance.
I would aim for keeping the boot drive to 60GB free.
I would also want to see the 500GB drive upgraded to 1TB or larger (use the 500GB for backup clone of the system for one thing).
Your 2TB is where I like to see: 50% free area.
You need to make a backup system image of the SSD with CCC and then restore from and booted from the clone and restore back to the SSD at some point soon. Use this SSD for scratch or another seeing you have a free hard drive bay #4 still open until you can get a PCIe Sonnet card (US$150-300).
Install TRIM Enabler 3.0 now and use Onyx after that.
There are more options today but the basic ideas, from MPG:
http://macperformanceguide.com/OptimizingPhotoshop-Intro.html
http://macperformanceguide.com/OptimizingPhotoshopCS5-Benchmarks.html
MPG LLoyd's site, is a graphic photographer and edit.
Eventuially a newer even a 2009 Mac Pro and better GPU and more cheaper RAM would make sense if you want to as would 10.8.5.
Or save up for Mac Pro 6,1 or to buy a used Mac Pro 2012 even. Some things you can take with you and re-use.
Look at your 8800GT.
It has one power cable. There are two thumb screws holding a bracket bar in place. So you can remove or upgrade or clean.
Small, 512MB VRAM, can run hot, can get dust clogged inside and need to be cleaned out. And could fail from heat and weak solder joints (take apart, bake in oven for 15 minutes at 350*F actually works, is documented how to do on Youtube). 10.6.8 does not provide as many options in graphic cards.
It seems like upgrade to 10.8.5 $19 might be worthwhile some point (another reason to 'clone' your system or start fresh with a new SSD for system, so you can if needed continue to boot and run 10.6.8).

128GB Vertex 4 vs 500GB WD black as scratch disk

Which would be better as a scratch disk? The extra speed of an SSD or the extra capasity of the HDD?
I've tried to search around alot before posting this question, but i cant find good new information that directly answers this simple question.
My setup will be 128 agility 3 for OS and cache, 500GB Samsung spinpoint f3for media files and either ssd or hdd for scratch disk. I5-2500k@4,5Ghz and 16gb 1600mhz ram.

What is a scratch disk? It is used to write intermediate files, like the media cache files, the media cache database, the preview files and possibly the Windows pagefile.
SSD's have a nasty habit in that their write performance deteriorates over time untill they reach their 'stable state'. Trimming does not help here. Secondly, SSD's have a limited number of write cycles in contrast to conventional disks. Once that number of write cycles has been reached, the SSD is dead. Writing a lot of small files to an SSD shortens the life-span and makes it reach its 'stable state'performance very quickly. Not all SSD's are equal and I do not know how the Vertex4 does, but generally the performance degradation is sizable. The Agility3 is not very good in that aspect. This means that the performance gain from using an SSD for scratch disks is marginal at best. Instead of a single SSD, you may be better off with two conventional disks in raid0 for scratch. It will be equally fast, possibly even faster and last a lot longer than a SSD and may also be cheaper.
Do not be lured by the marketing hype of some SSD manufacturers about the fabulous writing speeds, sometimes claiming speeds of 400-500 MB/s. In practice and after reaching its 'stable state' is is more often in the order of 300 MB/s or even less. The Agility3 may even top off at around 200 MB/s. Your i5 CPU will have more limitations on your performance than the possible use of a SSD for scratch.

SSD RAID0 as a boot drive on a Mac Pro

I'm buying a Mac Pro early 2008
I'm using Final Cut Pro and After Effects.
Option 1: (5) drives
1. OSX boot drive 80GB SSD (under the DVD drive)
2. 32GB SSD RAID0 (scratch/render drive) bay 1
3. 32GB SSD RAID0 (scratch/render drive) bay 2
4. 1TB RAID1 (backup) bay 3
5. 1TB RAID1 (backup) bay 4
or
Option 2: (4) drives
1. OSX boot drive 64GB SSD RAID0 (OS/scratch/render drive) bay 1
3. OSX boot drive 64GB SSD RAID0 (OS/scratch/render drive) bay 2
4. 1TB RAID1 (backup) bay 3
5. 1TB RAID1 (backup) bay 4
I've always had my OS on a separate drive than my scratch/storage disks. but I'm wondering if it's okay to RAID0 the OS and scratch/render drives together.

Move the mirror RAID to external backup.
Keep the OS and scratch volumes separate; as I said, keep to what you use to do, keep the OS separate. Yes, you should RAID both, but not together. No to option #2.
If you work with 1-2GB files, 16GB RAM is essential (maybe more). I assume you bought 2008 to save a little over 2008 in part to have 8 DIMM slots.
http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/specialdeals/mac/mac_pro

Why do people set their scratch disk to a RAM drive?

From what I've read, the scratch disk in Photoshop is there so that if you become low on RAM, it will move data from the RAM to the allocated scratch disk...so why bother making that scratch disk the RAM when it'll just be going from the RAM...to the RAM? Am I missing something here?

Siderz95 wrote:
From what I've read, the scratch disk in Photoshop is there so that if you become low on RAM, it will move data from the RAM to the allocated scratch disk...so why bother making that scratch disk the RAM when it'll just be going from the RAM...to the RAM? Am I missing something here?
They're the ones missing something. It doesn't help to swap RAM to RAM. Now, it's possible people are talking about pointing their TEMP area to a RAM drive. There could be merit in that, but...
You want a real leg up? Get a good SSD for scratch, or take it even further and run your entire system off an array of SSDs.
-Noel

Build new PC - SSD configuration - RAID0 useful?

Hello,
I plan to build up a new new PC, mainly use is Illustrator CS5 (probably upgrade later to CS6), but also a little usage of PS 64-bit and a 3D-application.
The genreal set up is clear:
Xeon E3-1230V3 Quadcore CPU (on a H77 MB wich supports RAID)
Quadro K-600 display card
32 GB Ram
2TB HDD
The big questionmark is the configuration of the SSDs:
From my budget I can deal with total of ~500GB SSD storage (Samsung 840 evo price level).
The question: Is a RAID 0 array useful? (with daily Backup).
I'm thinking of following Set ups :
A.) 4 x 120GB SSD Raid 0 array - OS, Scratch, Project-Data on different partitions
B.) 1 x 500 GB SSD - OS, Scratch, Project-Data on different partitions
C.) 1 x 250GB (OS & Project data on 2 partitions) + 2 x 120GB Raid 0 array for Scratch.
What option would provide the best performance ?
Further: Makes it sense to use a partition of the HDD for VM drive or better use OS partiotion?

I strongly recommend that you do some research about how SSDs function--IF you set your machine up as described--you will be needlessly burning up your SSDs.
multiple SSDs can be a waste of $$
for best performance--put your OS and Primary apps on a single SSD--do not use an SSD for a scratch disk (you'll wear it out) because SSDs have a limited number of 'write' cycles--the more you write to it, the faster it will become a 'read only' brick--use standard HDDs for storage and scratch disks (maybe 10,000 RPM if you want the best performance)--furthermore--partitioning an SSD is (generally) not recommended) partitioning a conventional HDD can cause problems--if the drive fails, for any reason, you could lose your partition(s)/data.
...and you probably shouldn't run SSDs in a raid array

Comments re: PCIe accelsior SSD upgrade vs. new MP

Thought to upgrade my MP ('09) w/ OWC's PCIe Accelsior vs. ordering a new MP. Don't know if this the card is working w/o problems? Considerable savings and advantages over getting the new MP i think. But, am I missng anything in considering the new MP? Comments? As for the dual graphics cards in the new MP I don't think I will need for a while considering the software.

So get a larger SSD. I would get Sonnet Tempo Pro $275 and use it for scratch.
$399 isn't bad if that is what you want. Just don't put any data on it, you don't need to.
Booting off PCIe does not pay that much if any in dividends.
Yes, nMP is 1.2Gb/sec but having system and scratch and data on separate buses frees up the traffic jams and IO.
MacPerformanceGuide - using two PCIe SSDs for scratch. Note, I don't have bookmark but MacRumors, there seemed to be a traffic jam when configuring where to put PCIe cards to get the most and that slots #3 & 4 did not provide full 900MB/sec X 2 that you would have anticipated.
6-core 3.33 / 32GB / use the PCIe 2 x 500GB SSD - you may need a larger SSD for the system (telling us what size). Photoshop even with a separate scratch still the plug-ins will use 100-160GB on the boot drive, or try to.
I would wait until Samsung offers their retail PCIe-SSD products and 3rd party upgrades for the nMP are out rather than invest $3500-4500 in new system and external storage.
SSDs and even PCIe can be reused in a new system external storage.
Unboxing and testing of old vs new
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1692536

What's the best setup / use for Thunderbolt + SSD iMac ?

Hi!
I'm testing one of the new 27" iMacs (i7, 16gb ram, SSD, 2tb internal HD, external Promise Thunderbolt disk)
I have until Monday to decide to keep it or return it and I'm doing this test to see if it would make a good second computer for our editing (primary is 8 core MacPro).
I can either afford this 27" iMac with a Promise Thunderbolt disk OR anoher MacPro with 4 internal disks.
Can someone please share with me how I would get max performance out of the iMac-setup?
Here's what I THINK prior to adding the Thunderbolt disk:
Internal SSD => Lion + apps
Internal HD => imported videofiles, scratchdisk, cache etc. and export disk
But then......... how should the situation change when adding the Thunderbolt drive ?
Is the Thunderbolt so fast, that all video data should be placed there or would I benefit from placing SOME part on the internal HD, and OTHER parts on the external Thunderbolt ?
Or even more complex ........ should I use all three disks (also the SSD) for different parts of the video / process and if so, what's your thoughts?
Or......... would you go for yet another 8 core Macpro without SSD and Thunderbolt??
Thank you for the inputs on this

klp29 wrote:
Or even more complex ........ should I use all three disks (also the SSD) for different parts of the video / process and if so, what's your thoughts?
Or......... would you go for yet another 8 core Macpro without SSD and Thunderbolt??
Are you only using one Thunderbolt disk? If so, IMHO, you're wasting the beauty of TBolt. To make much better use of it will cost a pretty penny, but you end up with a 4, 6, or 8-disk external RAID enclosure. In that, you stuff a bunch of drives and create however many RAID volumes you want. Preferably a couple of separate RAID0 volumes for the speed (raw data on one of them, scratch space on another, backing the raw data up elsewhere).
However, one TBolt disk is really a waste.
Were I buying a Mac right now, I'd get the following:
6-core 3.3GHz Mac Pro
aftermarket SSD (to hell with Apple's pricing)
aftermarket RAM (see above paranthetic)
2 10k WD SATA drives for an internal software-only RAID0 array for scratch
aftermarket ESATA PCIe card
ESATA enclosures with drives
That last bullet is "up to you" bit. You can do 2 external enclosures with RAID0, RAID1, whatever works for storage and speed. And it can be built piece-meal as you need to expand.
Why did I pick the 6-core vs. one of the 2 x 4-core machines? Horsepower, pure and simple. Those 3.3GHz 6-core chips are quick little bastards (compared to the rest of the Mac Pro line) and you really want raw number crunching power vs. a bzillion cores. Put the apps and OS on the SSD. Scratch space on the internal 10K drives. Then figure out how to split the storage up with your external enclosures.
When you're ready, grab a Quadro 4K card and enhance your video editing speed substantially.
jas

PhotoShop CC 2014 - Blowing Directories on Hard Drives - Should Ship with a free Version of Disk Warrior ;-)

Since installing PS CC 2014 I have had serious problems.
Problems one could expect from a 'new' software.
However, having my drives' directories damaged due to Scratch Disks is something I have never seen before.
I had PS use an SSD as Scratch Disk. As this became full, I assigned another scratch disk (This time a RAID0).
As it ran full (200GB of PS Scratch) All the other files on that drive vanished. And photoshop was no longer able to even save the current document
(event though the destination had enough space avail.) See screenshot:(Watch the finder status in the back, the doc to be saved was 200MB and my disk had 3.38 GB avail.
But PS would not let me save due to scratch disks full)
Anyway, back to the serious problem. The RAID0 scratch disk, after I quit PS, was not longer mountable.
Trying to repair it with DU reported:
And trying with terminal This:
** /dev/rdisk13
Executing fsck_hfs (version hfs-226.1.1).
** Checking Journaled HFS Plus volume.
** Checking extents overflow file.
** Checking catalog file.
** Rebuilding catalog B-tree.
CreateNewBTree returned -34
Disk full error
So I went ahead and did some research and found Disk Warrior.
It was able to rebuild my catalog and I am up an running again.
But having to spend $99 on a PS bug is not so nice. I have been able to recreate this problem 3 times the past hours.
The problem occurs only when PS is using the RAID as Scratch disk. If I try to fill the drive by writing to it via terminal or Finder,
i just get a Disk is Full. PS on the other hand will blow the catalog and make the disk unmountable...
Any Ideas ?

Thanks for your reply, Chris Cox. I've checked the Windows System Event Log and here are the details:
Details (Tab) of same error (Photoshop)
I noticed since Jan 5, 2015, Photoshop has crashed a lot. I run Adobe Illustrator with it but it doesn't give the same errors. Other applications run fine too, so I'm not sure if it as you mentioned that it is the "system" that is crashing so often.
(You seem to have suggested a video card upgrade. I will work on that next. Thanks)
I hope you or anyone who can, help me with this problem with Photoshop and the issue with my account in Creative Cloud.
Looking forward to your help. Thank you.

Lightroom 5 -what is best Mac platform?

I want to setup a new Mac system for Lightroom 5 use. I seem to get conflicting information on what is useful. e.g.:
Is LR 5 using Open GL/Open CL?
is LR 5 using CUDA
is it better to get fewer but faster cores or more cores but slower clock speed. E.g. is a 6-core Mac Pro more suitable than a 4 core one?
how much RAM is worth having. If I am only running LR do I still need more than 16GB ram??
is SSD better than RAID 0 /Thunderbolt 2 drive set, if they provide similarly spec'ed transfer speeds?
I know that Final Cut Pro X utalizes the Mac Pro's dual GPU cards, but what about LR 5? So would I be better setting up a maxed out iMac with a TB1 disk array, or even a MacBook Pro 2014 with TB2?
I don't want to put a dollar restriction on this setup, however I certainly don't have an open check book.
My current intent was a MacPro 6-core, 16GB ram and D500 video, however I am wondering if a MacBookPro would be better value (both with 1TB SSD) and would give me portability, a 2nd screen, and built in UPS. The savings could then fund a TB2 LaCie BigDisk or similar.

Thanks for the input. I guess I should have mentioned my current setup.
MBP 2012 i7 Quad 2.7GHz, 16GB ram and 512GB SATA 3 SSD
MBA 2013 i7 Dual core, 8GB ram, 512GB SSD - for field use
Mac Mini Server 2012, i7 16GB ram 2x 1TB drives - as backup/test machine
1000VA UPS
27" Cinema display LED TB1 connected
Samsung XL20 LED second monitor
LaCie TB1 connected 4TB (2x 2TB in RAID 0) external drive, used for video editing
2x 12TB ReadyNAS boxes for main storage and backup
Thinking of replacing the MBP with nMP 6-core (on order for Feb/March delivery). Now considering alterntives:
Get latest MBP with TB2 x2 ports, Retina, 1TB SSD PCIe
Or just put 2nd 512GB SSD into existing MBP and use them in RAID 0
Or iMac with 32GB ram but has only TB1
Benefits of each approach:
nMP - expandable, fastest for occasional video editing (FCPX),bleeding edge
nMBP - portable, internal screen+"UPS"
MBP 2012 upgraded - lowest cost option, can always get nMP later
Intended action plan:
Leave nMP order active and then use the 14 day eval period to decide whether to keep or return
Buy a nMBP when nMP arrives to compare and then return one or both (if keeping MBP2012)
Pretty much droped iMac option as I don't have free deskspace for a 2nd 27" display, plus it's only TB1
The big questions were with respect to LR5 optimization of h/w platform. The many seconds lag when adjusting sliders or moving between images, is annoying when editing 1,000+ images per shoot, even when I build 1:1 previews and use SSD for scratch. So wanted some feedback regarding what real life benefits the nMP will bring to LR operations.
Thanks for reading...

-- SSD as scratch

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for