Startup server Solaris EP SP2 Patch 4

I am trying to startup portal.....
I start state controller successfully
then dispatcher successfully joins state controller
then I attempt to start server and it hangs at
Loading service: com.sap.portal.usermanagement|security
Aug 5, 2004 11:50:36 AM ...portals.config.lock.SharedFileSystemLockService [Sys
tem_Thread_18] Warning": found a significant time-delta with the file server : -
936 milli seconds
Then it times out...I have upped timeout settings but still server will not start.....
I have checked logs under:
/usr/sap/JPS1/j2ee/j2ee_00/cluster/server/services/log/work
and found the following:
2004-08-05 12:15:29 | rfcengine | ERROR | | | Failed to initialize connection
with JCO ! |
2004-08-05 12:15:29 | rfcengine | ERROR | | | java.lang.Exception: SAPBasis of
SAP-Security could not be initialized. Probably the property-file is missing.
        at com.inqmy.services.rfcengine.Bundle.log(Bundle.java:291)
        at com.inqmy.services.rfcengine.Bundle.initialize(Bundle.java:147)
        at com.inqmy.services.rfcengine.Bundle.initBundle(Bundle.java:101)
        at com.inqmy.services.rfcengine.RFCRuntimeInterfaceImpl.init(RFCRuntimeI
nterfaceImpl.java:206)
        at com.inqmy.services.rfcengine.RFCApplicationFrame.start(RFCApplication
Frame.java:108)
        at com.inqmy.core.service.application.ApplicationServiceRunner.startFram
e(ApplicationServiceRunner.java:55)
        at com.inqmy.core.service.container.ServiceRunner.run(ServiceRunner.java
:129)
        at com.inqmy.core.thread.impl0.ActionObject.run(ActionObject.java:46)
        at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
        at com.inqmy.core.thread.impl0.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:148)
|
Thanks
John

There are known problems for usage of the startup framework with JCO and Solaris.
Please double check OSS 748713 "Central note - Usage of startup framework with EP 60 SP2" and OSS 701278 "Location of Files for the Startup Framework for 6.20" if you have installed the latest version.
Hope that helps,
rAimund

Similar Messages

Problem to install Directory Server 5.1 SP2 on Solaris

Hi
I need to install Directory Server 5.1 SP2 on Solaris 8. When I was asked to provide system user and system group, I provide "root" and "system". As a result, the installation fail message was shown and abort the installation.
However, I was install the Directory Server 5.1 SP1 on solaris 8 successfully by using "root" and "system". Does anybody know why?
Thanks and Regards,
William Siu

But i've more than 2 Go of free disk space !!!!
"Tim Muratet" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
Sure...Get more disk space.
"coolys" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:3a252a26$[email protected]..
hi,when i decompress the weblogic510.exe file under NT, in the end of theself extracting i have the message below :"The decompression of %s failed.
there may not be enough free disk space available in the TEMP"Can anybody
help to resolve this problems.thanks for yours reponses.

Weblogic 6.1 server upgrade from SP2 to SP3

Hi All
We have weblogic server 6.1 SP2 installed on the solaris machine. Now we
have to upgrade our weblogic server 6.1 SP3. We also have downloaded the installable.
But that installable seems to over-write the previous weblogic server & installs
the server afresh. Is there any patch kinda thing available which allows me to
upgrade from SP2 to SP3 ? I don't want a fresh new install of SP3 server.
thanks in advance
-Kiran Rane

Upgrade installer from SP2 to SP3 is only available for paid BEA
customers. You need a login at http://support.bea.com
Kumar
kiran rane wrote:
Hi All
We have weblogic server 6.1 SP2 installed on the solaris machine. Now we
have to upgrade our weblogic server 6.1 SP3. We also have downloaded the installable.
But that installable seems to over-write the previous weblogic server & installs
the server afresh. Is there any patch kinda thing available which allows me to
upgrade from SP2 to SP3 ? I don't want a fresh new install of SP3 server.
thanks in advance
-Kiran Rane

Upgrating SQL Server 2008 R2 SP2 to SQL Server 2014 Standard "UpgradeFeatureSpecificRules: KJRTMUpgradeBlockRule"

I've been searching for HOURS how to resolve this issue:
I am trying to upgrade SQL Server 2008 R2 (Express Edition with advanced services) to SQL SERVER 2014 Standard edition, my first issue was to update the 2008 R2 to Service pack 2 on the first FEATURE RULE TEST, at this time on it's keep saying this:
======================================================================================
Rule Check Result
Rule "SQL Server 2008 R2 Service pack 2 or later is requered for upgrade.: failed.
This SQL Server 2008 R2 features that have been selected to be upgraded to SQL Server 2014 are not at the require service pack. To continue with this upgrade, install SQL Server 2008 Service Pack 2 or lager to the selected instance and the shared features.
=====================================================================================
This is the Configuration Report issue:
Microsoft SQL Server 2014 - System Configuration Check Report
UpgradeFeatureSpecificRules: SQL Server 2014 Setup configuration checks for rules group 'UpgradeFeatureSpecificRules'
KJRTMUpgradeBlockRule
Checks if the currently selected SQL Server 2008 R2 features to upgrade are at the supported service pack. Failed The SQL Server 2008 R2 features that have been selected to be upgraded to SQL Server 2014 are not at the
required service pack. To continue with this upgrade, install SQL Server 2008 Service Pack 2 or later to the selected instance and the shared features.
====================================================================================
I try after hours and finally did install the Upgrade Advisor and got not issues, the last choice I was to uninstall the Management Studio because in other upgrade express versions got blocked, but in this new version of SQL Server 2014 I don't see any way
out!!!
Thanks.

Hi again
This is the scenario:
-I have installed the SQL SERVER 2008 R2 With Advanced services (version 10.50.1600.1), and now my guest decide to upgrade to an STARNDARD version which nowadays Microsoft is offering the 2014 version.
-As all IT Support and DBA I try to upgrade to SQL 2014 to check and see with requirements were missing or updates. The first check report only ask to upgrade to SQL SERVER 2008 R2 SP2 (version 10.51.2500.0) which I found in the optional update list and
resolved immediately with the Windows Update service.
-Finally, I realise doing the discovery report (suggested in the last post) is that Windows update only download the service pack 2 for SQL Server 2008 instead of the 2008 R2 (I downloaded manually) then the version was upgrade to 10.52.4000.0
Next time I might download the updates manually and not loosing a lot hours with Windows Update, another point very important is that when SQL Server 2008 R2 is installed, create the Microsoft SQL Server 2008 folder at all programas in the Startup menu:
with the SQL Server Installation Center, but there is not one R2, when you execute this one just show the 2008 installed features.
Now we are on 12.0.2000.8
Thanks anyway and all of you for your interest!!!

Do I need to install Security Hotfix (KB2977319) after Cumulative Update 12 for SQL Server 2008 R2 SP2

HI,
I have installed Cumulative Update 12 for SQL Server 2008 R2 SP2 on my SharePoint instances. This was to resolve a known issue faced with the instance. CU12 helped resolve the issue. My company is rather strict regarding security hotfixes. But I am
not sure if this particular hotfix [Security Hotfix (KB2977319)] is required if the instance has CU12 applied.
Tested this on a Lab server, the installation did run fine, the summary log also stated that the KB is applied. But the Build Number did not change. Hence the doubt.
Overall summary:
Final result:                  Passed
Exit code (Decimal):           0
Exit message:                  Passed
Start time:                    2014-09-06 10:31:21
End time:                      2014-09-06 10:55:49
Requested action:              Patch
Instance SPNTSQLTRN overall summary:
Final result:                  Passed
Exit code (Decimal):           0
Exit message:                  Passed
Start time:                    2014-09-06 10:48:08
End time:                      2014-09-06 10:55:45
Requested action:              Patch
Package properties:
Description:                   SQL Server Database Services 2008 R2
ProductName:                   SQL2008
Type:                          RTM
Version:                       10
SPLevel:                       2
KBArticle:                     KB2977319
KBArticleHyperlink:            http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=2977319
PatchType:                     QFE
AssociatedHotfixBuild:         0
Platform:                      x64
PatchLevel:                    10.52.4321.0
ProductVersion:                10.52.4000.0
GDRReservedRange:              10.50.4001.0:10.50.4199.0;10.50.4200.0:10.50.4250.0
PackageName:                   SQLServer2008-KB2977319-x64.exe
Installation location:         e:\ac2af22d88ee645b5b32b5c178\x64\setup\
Please inform if I need to apply the hotfix on CU12. Thanks in advance.
John S

Yes you must install Security update mentioned in KB 2977319 it is important for SQL Server to be patches with this security update. Without this it could allow an attacker to compromise your system and gain control over it.
Please mark this reply as answer if it solved your issue or vote as helpful if it helped so that other forum members can benefit from it
My Technet Articles

BOXI 4 SP2 Patch 11 - Constant awt.dll crashes in the Event Log

Hi All,
Since implementing BOXI 4 SP2 Patch 11 I have noticed very frequent awt.dll crash error messages triggered by SAP JVM throughout the event log.
Does anyone know what is causing this and how to resolve?
=================================================================
Faulting application name: java.exe, version: 6.0.170.4, time stamp: 0x4c3bb897
Faulting module name: awt.dll, version: 6.0.170.4, time stamp: 0x4c3bfa5f
Exception code: 0xc0000005
Fault offset: 0x00000000000d2210
Faulting process id: 0x1c80
Faulting application start time: 0x01ccefaba2a15b7a
Faulting application path: C:\Program Files (x86)\SAP BusinessObjects\SAP BusinessObjects Enterprise XI 4.0\win64_x64\sapjvm\bin\java.exe
Faulting module path: C:\Program Files (x86)\SAP BusinessObjects\SAP BusinessObjects Enterprise XI 4.0\win64_x64\sapjvm\jre\bin\awt.dll
Report Id: a6ef5e00-5ba2-11e1-a8c2-da6052897efd
====================================================================
Also notice this error immediately afterwards reporting Transaction Deadlocks in our repository and auditing databases on SQL Server :-
=====================================================================
Database access error. Reason [Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 10.0][SQL Server]Transaction (Process ID 63) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction..
=====================================================================
SQL Server version is 2008 Release 2.
Have deployed BOXI 4 using Tomcat 6/Java platform.
O/S in Windows Server 2008 Release 2.
This should be a supported configuration so need ideas on why this is happening?
Cheers,
Gary

Hi All,
SAP Support finally came through for us on this.
The issue is due to the version of the SAP JVM that comes bundled with BOXI 4 SP2 Patches 11 and 12.
If you download the latest version of the SAP JVM from the SAP support portal and install this instead then the problems are resolved.
Thanks,
Gary

Solaris 2.6 Patch cluster

Is there anyone out there knows where I can get the last Solaris 2.6 patch cluster? I know it's de-supported now but sadly some legacy applications are still out there and need to run on old software/hardware.
Many thanks in advance,
Jonathan

if you run a pstack against the core, I might
recognize the failure. Usually, logging is of no
use, as we don't log a crash. . .Thanks. I'll do that. It just generated a new core file.
>
I don't know of any problems with installing 4.15p7,
nor of installing later hotfixes on top of it, and
I've been supporting Messaging Server since 4.0 came
out. . . .
If you've had file permission issues since 4.05,
that's truly news to me, unless it was that pesky
problem with Admin Server, where it would change the
permissions of the logs when it went to roll them
over. I don't remember when we fixed that one, but
we did..We've had file permission issues with the patches since 4.0. When we'd upgrade some of the files would be owned by root and not exec'able by nobody. Some of the patches would fail when the patch process would try to bind to the directory (I don't know why). We've used NMS since the 3.x version. It has also been a long time since we tried to patch to app because our experience was bad. It was stable for a long time (once we disabled shared folders and resolved the nscd issue).

Solaris 10 kernel Patch 127127-11

we need to apply solaris 10 kernel Patch 127127-11 in our prod server as a prerequisite for oracle10g patch set 10.2.0.4 installation
but i found a Doc 242366 (May Cause a system Panic from ip_wput_ioctl()).It is mentioned in doc that Binary relief is available through normal
support channels.Is that Binary complete fix of this problem?If yes, then i need that binary please give me the link where i can download the binary,
If not, then what is the solution of this problem.?
Thanks

These kinds of binary hotfixes/IDR's are only available through sun support to contract customers.
If your concerned, I suggest you raise a support case.
That being said, 127127-11 is kinda old. So I would be surprised if the bug hadnt been fixed by now.
Its been replaced by either 137111 or 137137.
Ive upgraded at least a dozen systems past that level and never seen a problem.
So it can't be too common..

Performace problem in oracle DB after Solaris 10 recommended patching

Dear All,
We are facing some performance problems in our oracle DB qerries and reports recently. We applied Solaris 10 recommended patchset on april 24th. Our monthly report generation acitivity is now running for last 3 days i.e may 11,12,13 and application team is complaining of degraded performance. I can see that the cpu usage on the server is about 100% during the report generation , but everything else is fine. Free memory is 15gb , all mountpoints are under 80% and there is no other hardware issue as well.
Now app team is suspecting that last month patching could be the cause of the problem, because till last month they were performing this activity without having a performance degradtion.
I just need to be sure that solaris 10 recommended patches are not causing this issue. Any of you ever faced such an issue after patch installation ?
The server is V490 with 8 cpu / 32gb RAM. Any hints will be appreciated ?
Thanks in Advance.
Edited by: 1005720 on May 13, 2013 9:58 PM

I did not archive the o/p of prstat but have o/p of top with me
195 processes: 175 sleeping, 13 running, 1 zombie, 6 on cpu
CPU states: 0.0% idle, 78.4% user, 21.6% kernel, 0.0% iowait, 0.0% swap
Memory: 32G phys mem, 16G free mem, 70G total swap, 70G free swap
PID USERNAME LWP PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME CPU COMMAND
18964 oracle 39 41 0 6389M 5488M cpu/1 2:50 15.04% oracle
19638 oracle 26 59 0 6390M 5490M run 0:27 8.58% oracle
19648 oracle 36 31 0 6418M 5516M run 0:21 5.92% oracle
19023 oracle 34 30 0 6398M 5498M run 0:37 5.88% oracle
7229 oracle 38 30 0 6427M 5514M run 234:24 5.69% oracle
6912 oracle 45 31 0 6395M 5483M cpu/16 218:04 5.31% oracle
7216 oracle 28 31 0 6430M 5517M run 232:40 5.04% oracle
19644 oracle 35 40 0 6390M 5490M cpu/17 0:24 4.74% oracle
6897 oracle 112 30 0 6392M 5479M run 236:38 4.52% oracle
3813 oracle 106 31 0 6428M 5528M run 100:11 4.43% oracle
18970 oracle 234 31 0 6398M 5499M cpu/0 1:45 4.15% oracle
19749 oracle 1 32 0 6386M 5486M run 0:00 4.05% oracle
19646 oracle 23 31 0 6405M 5505M run 0:25 3.61% oracle
18972 oracle 11 32 0 6398M 5497M run 2:18 3.61% oracle
7220 oracle 258 32 0 6468M 5555M cpu/3 113:13 3.56% oracle
During the entire issue there was no %iowait.

Adding Index server to existing farm, "Server Farm Product and Patch Status" returned 34 Missing Locally required products and patches

Once I connected my new server to my farm's config db, it returned all of the following missing locally. I stripped out any redundancies and Headings, and I'm left with 43. I'm looking for a efficient strategy. Should I start with the lowest version number
and work my way up? Current DB version is 14.0.7015.1000. IIRC, SP2 is cumulative, so can I ignore the first two (SP1 and Hotfix), install SP2, and then the Language packs and etc on top?
Sorted by version:
Microsoft SharePoint 2010 Service Pack 1 (SP1) (14.0.6029.1000)
Hotfix for Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010 (KB2775353) 64-Bit Edition (14.0.6105.5000)
Service Pack 2 for Microsoft SharePoint 2010 (KB2687453) 64-Bit Edition (14.0.7015.1000)
Service Pack 2 for Microsoft 2010 Server Language Pack (KB2687462) 64-Bit Edition (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft Office Server Proof (English) 2010 (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft Office Server Proof (French) 2010 (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft Office Server Proof (Russian) 2010 (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft Office Server Proof (Spanish) 2010 (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft SharePoint Portal (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft User Profiles (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft SharePoint Portal English Language Pack (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft Shared Components (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft Shared Coms English Language Pack (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft Slide Library (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft InfoPath Forms Services (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft InfoPath Form Services English Language Pack (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft Word Server (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft Word Server English Language Pack (14.0.7015.1000)
PerformancePoint Services for SharePoint (14.0.7015.1000)
PerformancePoint Services in SharePoint 1033 Language Pack (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft Visio Services English Language Pack (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft Visio Services Web Front End Components (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft Excel Services Components (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft Document Lifecycle Components (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft Excel Services English Language Pack (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft Search Server 2010 Core (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft Search Server 2010 English Language Pack (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft Document Lifecycle Components English Language Pack (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft Slide Library English Language Pack (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010 (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft Access Services Server (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft Access Services English Language Pack (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft Web Analytics Web Front End Components (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft Web Analytics English Language Pack (14.0.7015.1000)
Microsoft Excel Mobile Viewer Components (14.0.7015.1000)
Recommendations?
Thanks,
Scott

Thanks guys. I was able to get through all of the patches except for
Language Pack for SharePoint, Project Server and Office Web Apps 2010 - English missing locally
Language Pack for SharePoint, Project Server and Office Web Apps 2010 -
Spanish/Español missing locally
This was my process:
Config Wizard:
Adding Index server to existing farm, "Server Farm Product and Patch Status" returned 34 Missing Locally required products and patches.
SKIP installing the following two, as SP2 is cumulative
Microsoft SharePoint 2010 Service Pack 1 (SP1) (14.0.6029.1000) (officeserver2010sp1-kb2460045-x64-fullfile-en-us.exe)
Hotfix for Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010 (KB2775353) 64-Bit Edition (14.0.6105.5000)
install SP2 oserversp2010-kb2687453-fullfile-x64-en-us.exe
install oslpksp2010-kb2687462-fullfile-x64-en-us.exe
Got "There are no products affected by this package installed on this system."
SO!
Uninstalled Sharepoint 2010 Server
WIll try to install again, without skipping #2, and reorder installation of oslpksp2010-kb2687462-fullfile-x64-en-us.exe
Retry (the long way):
Run SharePointServer.exe, get Missing Locally...
Install oslpksp2010-kb2687462-fullfile-x64-en-us.exe SUCCESSFUL
Install officeserver2010sp1-kb2460045-x64-fullfile-en-us.exe SUCCESSFUL
Reboot
Install oserversp2010-kb2687453-fullfile-x64-en-us.exe SUCCESSFUL
Rerun Config
STILL MISSING
Download oslpksp2010-kb2687462-fullfile-x64-es-es.exe, run, "there are no products affected..."
Uninstall.
Re-retried, only got through the first couple:
Run SharePointServer.exe, get Missing Locally...
Install SP1 officeserver2010sp1-kb2460045-x64-fullfile-en-us.exe, SUCCESSFUL
Install English Lang Pack oslpksp2010-kb2687462-fullfile-x64-en-us.exe, "There are no products affected by this package installed on this system."
Install Spanish Lang Pack oslpksp2010-kb2687462-fullfile-x64-es-es.exe,
Install SP2 oserversp2010-kb2687453-fullfile-x64-en-us.exe, run Config Wizard
I'm now downloading 462150_intl_x64_zip.exe, going to try and install it as step three.
Any suggestions greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Scott

JTDS not connecting with SQL Server 2008 R2 SP2 + SSL with Java 6 U34-35

Environment:
Windows 7 Pro 32-bit
SQL Server 2008 R2 SP2 (Forced Encryption = Yes, No Certificate provided to server)
Java 6 Update 27-35 and Java 7 Update 2-7
jTDS 1.2.2 and 1.2.6
Under the following setup, our Java application is able to connect to the SQL Server database:
- SQL Server 2008 R2 SP2
- Java 6 Update 27-33 or Java 7 Update 2-5
just switching the JVM to the following would cause the application to be unable to connect to the database:
- Java 6 Update 34 or 35, or Java 7 Update 6 or 7
Browsing through the Java 6 Update 34 release notes, it looks like nothing big was changed, so I'm wondering what has changed with Java 6 U34 and Java 7 U6. I was also looking through a packet sniffer, and indeed the behavior of Java 6 Update 33 and lower was different from Java 6 Update 34 (although I couldn't understand the messages being passed, the number of connections and messages were different).
* This is different from the issue with Java 6 Update 29-30 and Java 7 wherein they were patched for the BEAST SSL vulnerability. That was fixed with the SP2 patch for SQL Server 2008 R2, and for SQL Server 2008 you'd need a hotfix aside from SP3. After patching the server with those updates, Java 6 Update 29-33 and Java 7 U1-5 should be able to connect to the database.
* If I do switch off Force Encryption, all Java versions are able to connect to the database.
Edited by: user1357749 on Oct 12, 2012 1:20 AM

Hi,
It's four months later, but my colleague and I have reproduced the same behavior in both our commercial product, and a very simple example class. It's exactly as you describe it, where the latest versions of both Java 6 and 7 (and several previous versions) hang during the first jTDS SQL query to the DB (immediately after the SSL and handshake). It also happens with the Microsoft JDBC driver.
If you disable the BEAST SSL fix (-Djsse.enableCBCProtection=false), then the connections work without any problems. So, while this is different from the original BEAST SSL problem and subsequent fix, it really seems like some additional changes were made to the fix in a later Java release that broke things.
My colleague has filed a bug with Oracle, and is awaiting a response. We also filed a bug at the jTDS project (#690 - http://sourceforge.net/p/jtds/bugs/690/) that has simple reproduction steps. A contributer at the jTDS project agrees that this seems to be a problem with the JRE, and is not specific to jTDS.
I hope that Oracle will address this issue soon. We need to periodically update the JRE due to vulnerabilities, and we need to have SSL for our JDBC connections for security reasons. This bug puts us and others in a difficult position.

Installing SQL Server 2008 R2 SP2 CU 13

Hi,
For one of SQL Server instances the current version is 10.50.4033(SQL Server 2008 R2 SP2 GDR).
Now I am not able to install a cumulative upgrade "2967540 Cumulative update package 13 (CU13)".
"There are no SQL Server instances or shared features that can be updated on this computer"
Is there any patch that I am missing?
Suman

Hello,
You may get this error when you download the 32-bit version of the update (x86) and you are trying to apply it to a 64-bit
instance of SQL Server.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Alberto Morillo
SQLCoffee.com

Slow Performance BI Launch Pad - BI 4 SP2 patch 8

Hi experts, i have this seriuos problem: i have installed BI 4 SP2 patch 8 on windows server 2008 server based on 12 GB Ram but when tree user access at the same time at BI Launch Pad, the server has an lowering performance and to access in BI Launc pad is necessary attend long time.
Could you help me? Are there some configuration parameters to set?
Thank's a lot.
Andrea

This is what I received from SAP:
- It is a bug in the BI 4.0 product and an ADAPT01711291 has
been raised for the same.
- Please go through the attached KBA '1933935 - BI Launchpad search
failing with error "The property with ID SI_CUID does not exist in the
object" for non-Admin users' for more information.
- As per the ADAPT details, it is targeted to be fixed in BI 4.0 SP10
which is scheduled to release in July 2014 week 30
- The schedule is subject is to change without prior notice. You can
regularly check the SAP BusinessObjects maintenance schedule on the
following link on SAP service marketplace
SAP Support portal -> Software Downloads ->SAP Software Download
Center -> Support Packages and Patches -> SAP Support Package stacks
- You are using BI 4.1 SP2 and I did not find information about
inclusion of fix of this issue in release notes of latest Service
packs of BI 4.1 (SP3 or SP4)
- So as per my knowledge you will have to wait for BI 4.0 SP 10 to
release and the releases of BI 4.1 post to that will have the fix of
this issue.

Windows Server 2008 x64 SP2 SAN disks falls off

Hello!
We have a Windows Server 2008 Standart SP2 x64, which is connected via two HBAs QLogic QLA2440 to a Storage Xyratex F5402. On DS5402 are located three LUNs for the corporate file storage. These LUNs are displayed in Windows Server as local disks E F G.
As the MPIO software it is used Xyratex Storview Pathmanager 6.00.5016.14 (Microsoft MPIO Driver 6.0.6002.18005) in Failover\Failback configuration, and three disks are adjusted for work on three different ways.
It is all normally worked since 2008
But problems have begun with the beginning of this year.
In operation time any of the SAN disks falls off. With a F5402 all is normal and its logs there are no errors.
In Windows Event System Log the folowing errors and warnings:
EventID: 515, Source: xyrsp200 (Xyratex F5402E Multi-Path Device Specific Module). The path for logical drive [SN: 60050CC00020188D0000000000000007] has failed over to [0005 4:0:1:2] because of a path error.
EventID: 23, Source: mpio. Errors in all ways. \Device\MPIODisk2 it will be removed.
EvetID: 260, Source: xyrsp200 The active path on logical drive [SN: 60050CC00020188D0000000000000007] has been switched to the preferred path on [0005 5:0:0:2].
EventID: 15, Source: disk. Access to the device \Device\Harddisk5\DR5 while is impossible
and further an disk erors...
Disk reloading in Windows Disk Manager doesn't help. I am compelled to reboot the server. After reboot all works as though anything and wasn't to the following such case.
As fall off not all LUNы at once (one can fall off, others and will to work normally) a problem probably either in Windows or in Xyratex Storview Pathmanager.
After adjustment of monitoring I have found out that at the moment of failure the current queue of a falling disk was 6 and the size of operation of record on a disk has sharply increased.
May be the disk simply hasn't sustained loading (though strange - Fiber-Chaneell, and High-Perfomance Disks Storage). In Windows it can be somehow possible to optimize operations of work with disks that there were no such falls.
I need a help !!!
Andy Mishechkin

Hello
I've configured my SCOM service on windows server 2008 r2 sp1, and it's database is placed on 2 disks on SAN storage (HP p9000). since MPIO is configured, sometimes SCOM was stop working. I looked Disk management console and I saw DB disks were gone! This problem
solves when I restart the server. This was happening frequently and I've changed the MPIO configuration policies. that get better but it was happening in a bit longer periods.
I searched and found out I have to install Fibrechannel hotfix (fcinfo_amd64) and Windows6.1-KB2470949-v2-x64 and the mentioned patch above. I did this and for last 3 months that was ok but last night it happens again.
It is our monitoring system and send very important messages. please help me.
may be this information helps:
Alert
occuring sequence in LOG files:
All paths have failed.
\Device\MPIODisk2 will be removed.
A fail-over on \Device\MPIODisk2
occurred.
The device,
\Device\Harddisk3\DR3,
is not ready for access yet.
The description for Event ID 304 from source hpxpdsm cannot be found.
Either the component that raises this event is not installed on your local computer or the installation is corrupted. You can install or repair the component on the local computer
thanks in advance

Error occur when installing iPlanet App server 6.0 SP2

Dear All,
I have problems in installing the iPlanet App server 6.0 SP2 in Solaris.
I choose typical installation and select default settings.
- install iplanet server
- typical install
- install ALL components
However, the following errors occur during the installation:
sh: ./pre_nas_preinst: not found
ERROR. Failure installing iPlanet Application Server Web Connector Component. Do you want to continue [n]?
ERROR. Failure installing iPlanet Application Server Core Server Component. Do you want to continue [n]?
ERROR. ...........
What's the problem with it? Could anyone help....?
Thank youin advance.
Thx & Regards,
Yvonne

I would recommend to use the latest version of application server which is iAS6.5sp1MU2. Try this out and see if you run into any problems. Also please check the release notes available at docs.sun.com to check the compatibility.

Startup server Solaris EP SP2 Patch 4

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for