Static nat and service port groups

I need some help with opening ports on my ASA using firmware 9.1.2.
I read earlier today that I can create service groups and tie ports to those.  But how do I use those instead of using 'object network obj-ExchangeSever-smtp' ? 
I have the ACL -
access-list incoming extended permit tcp any object-group Permit-1.1.1.1 interface outside
Can this statement
object network obj-ExchangeSever-smtp
nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp smtp smtp
reference the service port groups instead? 
Thanks,
Andrew

Hi,
Are you looking a way to group all the ports/services you need to allow from the external network to a specific server/servers?
Well you can for example configure this kind of "object-group"
object-group service SERVER-PORTS
service-object tcp destination eq www
service-object tcp destination eq ftp
service-object tcp destination eq https
service-object icmp echo
access-list OUTSIDE-IN permit object-group SERVER-PORTS any object
The above would essentially let you use a single ACL rule to allow multiple ports to a server or a group of servers. (Depending if you use an "object" or "object-group" to tell the destination address/addresses)
I am not sure how you have configured your NAT. Are they all Static PAT (Port Forward) configurations like the one you have posted above or perhaps Static NAT configurations?
You can use the "object network " created for the NAT configuration in the above ACL rule destination field to specify the host to which traffic will be allowed to. Using the "object" in the ACL doesnt tell the ASA the ports however. That needs to be configured in the above way or in your typical way.
Hope this helps
- Jouni

Similar Messages

  • HA on 5508 and service ports

                       Hi everybody.
    Two 5508 WLCs running 7.4.100.60. I had to activate HA
    I decided to configure Service ports: following HA conf guide, I used DHCP. That's because static IPs on service ports are often cleared and forgot during switchover. HA went up perfectly; tests were positive: by rebooting the active unit, standby was immediately ready, and so on.
    I decided to test maintenance mode: by shutting down the mgt ports of the active unit, the standby one was activated, and the active went into maintenance mode (because it did not reach the standby). This again is correct.
    Issue: when the unit is in this status (maintenance), its service port IS NOT reachable! I have to open again its mgt ports: the unit does not change tha maintenance status (and this is fully correct), but becomes reachable through its service port.
    This is not enough: the active unit remembers the peer service port address, but the standby one does not.
    Moreover, after some time, when I try to contact the latter, I jump on the former (I am always talking of Service ports).
    This is really diffcult for me to explain.... Any suggestion?
    Thanks
    Davide

    Hi 
    In my 5508 WLC i have exactly the same problem as you  gsutherland 
    I tried apply this command config 802.11b 11nSupport a-mpdu tx priority all disable
    and i get message 
    "802.11b network not disabled"
    Why i must turn off b standard ?
    Thanks for respons 

  • Static NAT and multiple WAN (DSL) ports

    Hi,
    we have a hardware router with 3 ADSL/SDSL lines. The SDSL has a range of public IP addresses.
    We assigned these public IP adresses as DMZ to the hardware router, and added some of the IP's as secondary IP addresses on the BM's public interface. Filters have been disabled for testing, and we could ping the secondary IP's from the internet.
    In the next step, we set up a static NAT to a server in the private LAN, which should be reached from travelling users. Pinging the natted address from the internet reached the server (seen with etherreal), but BM did not set the public IP as the source of the ping reply.
    For testing, we set a static route on the BM to the PC on the internet, using the DMZ as default gateway, which was used for testing, and that worked fine.
    Is there a chance to get the reply from the natted Server back to the DMZ, where the request came from? Setting static routes isnt possible, because users come with changing IP addresses.
    Detlef

    In article <[email protected]>, Pinkel wrote:
    > Is there a chance to get the reply from the natted Server back to the
    > DMZ, where the request came from? Setting static routes isnt possible,
    > because users come with changing IP addresses.
    >
    This is a routing issue, with a possible workaround.
    When the BMgr server gets a packet it needs to route, it's going to look
    in its routing tables to know which interface to send it from, and which
    IP address will be the next hop. Traffic coming inbound will naturally
    leave the private interface and route normally to the internal address.
    Traffic going back to the internet is another matter.
    Traffic from the internet is, naturally, going to have a public IP
    address that will not be in the BMgr server's routing tables, unless you
    put in a static route. If the destination address for a packet is not
    in the BMgr routing table, it will send the packet to the only choice it
    has: the default route. Thus, all outbound non-static-nat'd traffic
    will end up going out the default route.
    I have used, on occasion, a workaround that forces traffic coming in
    from one link to go back out that link. If you think of how BMgr
    (NetWare) is routing replies to these packets, you realize that the only
    way it is going to go back out link B (if link A is the default) is if
    the packet actually comes from the address for link B. The way I've
    made this happen is to enable dynamic NAT on the link B address. (For
    instance, Cisco router with link B, totally different subnet - due to
    isp changeover - from link A. Link A was the default. Enabled NAT with
    overload on link B LAN address, and BMgr then saw all packets coming in
    from that router as local packets simply coming from the link B LAN
    address. So it replied to link B. However, all outbound (non-reply)
    traffic to the internet still went out link A. I've also configured a
    second internet link for VPN only usage, but that was no more than a
    static route entry.)
    Craig Johnson
    Novell Support Connection SysOp
    *** For a current patch list, tips, handy files and books on
    BorderManager, go to http://www.craigjconsulting.com ***

  • Static-nat and vpn tunnel bound traffic from same private address?

    Hi guys,
    I have site-to-site tunnel local host @192.168.0.250 and remote-host @172.16.3.3.
    For this local host @192.168.0.250, I also have a static one-to-one private to public.
    static (mgmt-192,outside-50) 216.9.50.250 192.168.0.250 netmask 255.255.255.255
    As you can see, IPSec SA shows end-points in question and traffic is being decrypted but not encrypted host traffic never enter into the tunnel, why?
    How can I resolve this problem, without complicating the setup ?
    BurlingtonASA1# packet-tracer input mgmt-192 icmp 192.168.0.250 8 0 172.16.3.3
    Phase: 1
    Type: CAPTURE
    Subtype: 
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Additional Information:
    MAC Access list
    Phase: 2
    Type: ACCESS-LIST
    Subtype: 
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Implicit Rule
    Additional Information:
    MAC Access list
    Phase: 3
    Type: ROUTE-LOOKUP
    Subtype: input
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Additional Information:
    in   0.0.0.0         0.0.0.0         outside-50
    Phase: 4
    Type: ROUTE-LOOKUP
    Subtype: input
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Additional Information:
    in   192.168.0.0     255.255.255.0   mgmt-192
    Phase: 5
    Type: ACCESS-LIST
    Subtype: log
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    access-group mgmt_intf in interface mgmt-192
    access-list mgmt_intf extended permit icmp any any 
    access-list mgmt_intf remark *** Permit Event02 access to DMZ Intf ***
    Additional Information:
    Phase: 6
    Type: IP-OPTIONS
    Subtype: 
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Additional Information:
    Phase: 7
    Type: INSPECT
    Subtype: np-inspect
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Additional Information:
    Phase: 8
    Type: NAT-EXEMPT
    Subtype: 
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    nat-control
      match ip mgmt-192 host 192.168.0.250 outside-50 host 172.16.3.3
        NAT exempt
        translate_hits = 5, untranslate_hits = 0
    Additional Information:
    Phase: 9
    Type: NAT
    Subtype: 
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    static (mgmt-192,outside-50) 216.9.50.250 192.168.0.250 netmask 255.255.255.255 
    nat-control
      match ip mgmt-192 host 192.168.0.250 outside-50 any
        static translation to 216.9.50.250
        translate_hits = 25508, untranslate_hits = 7689
    Additional Information:
    Phase: 10
    Type: NAT
    Subtype: host-limits
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    static (mgmt-192,dmz2-172) 192.168.0.0 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 
    nat-control
      match ip mgmt-192 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 dmz2-172 any
        static translation to 192.168.0.0
        translate_hits = 28867754, untranslate_hits = 29774713
    Additional Information:
    Phase: 11
    Type: VPN
    Subtype: encrypt
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Additional Information:
    Phase: 12
    Type: FLOW-CREATION
    Subtype: 
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Additional Information:
    New flow created with id 1623623685, packet dispatched to next module
    Result:
    input-interface: mgmt-192
    input-status: up
    input-line-status: up
    output-interface: outside-50
    output-status: up
    output-line-status: up
    Action: allow
    BurlingtonASA1# 
    Crypto map tag: map1, seq num: 4, local addr: 216.9.50.4
          access-list newvpn extended permit ip host 192.168.0.250 host 172.16.3.3 
          local ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (192.168.0.250/255.255.255.255/0/0)
          remote ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (172.16.3.3/255.255.255.255/0/0)
          current_peer: 216.9.62.4
          #pkts encaps: 0, #pkts encrypt: 0, #pkts digest: 0
          #pkts decaps: 53, #pkts decrypt: 53, #pkts verify: 53
          #pkts compressed: 0, #pkts decompressed: 0
          #pkts not compressed: 0, #pkts comp failed: 0, #pkts decomp failed: 0
          #pre-frag successes: 0, #pre-frag failures: 0, #fragments created: 0
          #PMTUs sent: 0, #PMTUs rcvd: 0, #decapsulated frgs needing reassembly: 0
          #send errors: 0, #recv errors: 0
          local crypto endpt.: 216.9.50.4, remote crypto endpt.: 216.9.62.4
          path mtu 1500, ipsec overhead 74, media mtu 1500
          current outbound spi: 37CA63F1
          current inbound spi : 461C843C
        inbound esp sas:
          spi: 0x461C843C (1176273980)
             transform: esp-aes-256 esp-sha-hmac no compression 
             in use settings ={L2L, Tunnel, }
             slot: 0, conn_id: 77398016, crypto-map: map1
             sa timing: remaining key lifetime (kB/sec): (3914997/25972)
             IV size: 16 bytes
             replay detection support: Y
             Anti replay bitmap: 
              0x003FFFFF 0xFFFFFFFF
        outbound esp sas:
          spi: 0x37CA63F1 (936010737)
             transform: esp-aes-256 esp-sha-hmac no compression 
             in use settings ={L2L, Tunnel, }
             slot: 0, conn_id: 77398016, crypto-map: map1
             sa timing: remaining key lifetime (kB/sec): (3915000/25972)
             IV size: 16 bytes
             replay detection support: Y
             Anti replay bitmap: 
              0x00000000 0x00000001

    Hi
    intersting VPN ACL
    object-group network DM_INLINE_NETWORK_18
         network-object YYY.YYY.YYY.0 255.255.255.0
    object-group network DM_INLINE_NETWORK_22
    network-object UUU.UUU.UUU.0 255.255.255.0
    access-list outside_access_in extended permit ip object-group DM_INLINE_NETWORK_22 object-group DM_INLINE_NETWORK_18
    Static NAT
    static (Inside,outside) XXX.XXX.XXX.171 YYY.YYY.YYY.39 netmask 255.255.255.255
    No NAT
    object-group network DM_INLINE_NETWORK_20
    network-object UUU.UUU.UUU.0 255.255.255.0
    access-list Inside_nat0_outbound extended permit ip ZZZ.ZZZ.ZZZ.0 255.255.255.0 object-group DM_INLINE_NETWORK_20
    VPN CLient Pool
    No pool configured as it uses the interesting traffic or protected traffic in ASDM - UUU.UUU.UUU.0 is the IP address range at the far side of the site to site VPN.
    I hope this helps
    Thanks

  • Static Nat and VPN conflict

    Hi
    I could not quite find any information that was close enough to my problem that would enable me to solve it so hence I am now reaching out to you guys.
    I have a Cisco ASA running 8.2(1) and I am using ASDM to manage the firewall. I have a Linux VPN server on the inside with and IP address of YYY.YYY.YYY.39 with a static NAT to the outside with an address of XXX.XXX.XXX.171 .
    I have a site to site VPN tunnel which terminates on the outside of the ASA on the outside interface XXX.XXX.XXX.190 .
    Traffic from the YYY.YYY.YYY.0/24 network can't transverse the site to site VPN as there is a conflict of IP address's on the far side so it is natted via a dynamic policy to host address ZZZ.ZZZ.ZZZ.100
    Users remote into the inside(YYY.YYY.YYY.0/24) for support via the Linux VPN server (.39) and then need to communicate down the site to site VPN. The problem is that the static NAT for the incomming connections takes preference and bypasses the site to site VPN tunnel for outbound traffic. I tried to create a policy Static nat but it tries to modify the static nat that handels the incomming traffic to the Linux server.
    I hope the above makes sense.

    Hi
    intersting VPN ACL
    object-group network DM_INLINE_NETWORK_18
         network-object YYY.YYY.YYY.0 255.255.255.0
    object-group network DM_INLINE_NETWORK_22
    network-object UUU.UUU.UUU.0 255.255.255.0
    access-list outside_access_in extended permit ip object-group DM_INLINE_NETWORK_22 object-group DM_INLINE_NETWORK_18
    Static NAT
    static (Inside,outside) XXX.XXX.XXX.171 YYY.YYY.YYY.39 netmask 255.255.255.255
    No NAT
    object-group network DM_INLINE_NETWORK_20
    network-object UUU.UUU.UUU.0 255.255.255.0
    access-list Inside_nat0_outbound extended permit ip ZZZ.ZZZ.ZZZ.0 255.255.255.0 object-group DM_INLINE_NETWORK_20
    VPN CLient Pool
    No pool configured as it uses the interesting traffic or protected traffic in ASDM - UUU.UUU.UUU.0 is the IP address range at the far side of the site to site VPN.
    I hope this helps
    Thanks

  • Static NAT and same IP address for two interfaces

    We have a Cisco ASA 5520 and in order to conserve public IP addresses and configuration (possibly) can we use the same public IP address for a static NAT with two different interfaces? Here is an example of what I'm refering too where 10.10.10.10 would be the same public IP address.
    static (inside,Outside) 10.10.10.10  access-list inside_nat_static_1
    static (production,Outside) 10.10.10.10  access-list production_nat_static_1
    Thanks for any help.
    Jeff

    Hi Jeff,
    Unfortunately this cannot be done, on the ASA packet classification is done on the basis of mac-address, destination nat and route, and here you are confusing the firewall, to which interface does the ip belong to. I haven't ever tried to do it, but it should cause you issues.
    Thanks,
    Varun Rao
    Security Team,
    Cisco TAC

  • ASA 8.2 - Static NAT and Dynamic NAT Policy together

    Hello community,
    I have the following problem using a ASA with version 8.2.
    1) I have this segment on interface Ethernet 0/0: 192.168.1.0/24
    2) Through interface Ethernet 0/1 I will reach several servers using the same source IP, but other servers must be reached using only one IP, for example 192.168.1.70
    so, I have configured a Static NAT Rule from interface Ethernet0/0 to interface Ethernet 0/1 which NAT the source IPs to the same IPs: 192.168.1.0/24->192.168.1.0/24. Also I have configured a Dynamic NAT Policy that states when destination IP is "server list" then all the source IPs must be translated to 192.168.1.70.
    PROBLEM: when testing it...always the static wins....and Dynamic is never analyzed...Also, no priority for the NAT policy and NAT rules can be done on ASDM...what can I do? is there a way to do this on ASDM or CLI? (preferrely at ASDM)
    Thanks for your reply and help!

    Hello community,
    I have the following problem using a ASA with version 8.2.
    1) I have this segment on interface Ethernet 0/0: 192.168.1.0/24
    2) Through interface Ethernet 0/1 I will reach several servers using the same source IP, but other servers must be reached using only one IP, for example 192.168.1.70
    so, I have configured a Static NAT Rule from interface Ethernet0/0 to interface Ethernet 0/1 which NAT the source IPs to the same IPs: 192.168.1.0/24->192.168.1.0/24. Also I have configured a Dynamic NAT Policy that states when destination IP is "server list" then all the source IPs must be translated to 192.168.1.70.
    PROBLEM: when testing it...always the static wins....and Dynamic is never analyzed...Also, no priority for the NAT policy and NAT rules can be done on ASDM...what can I do? is there a way to do this on ASDM or CLI? (preferrely at ASDM)
    Thanks for your reply and help!

  • Static NAT and IPSec VPN

    This maybe stupid but may somebody help on this.
    Site A --- Internet --- Site B
    An IPSec VPN is implemented between Site A and Site B. Some "nat 0" commands are used on Site A PIX to avoid addresses being translated when communicating with site B.
    But now there is a problem, there are several public servers which have static NAT entries by "static" command. And it looks like these entry will still be valid even if the "nat 0" is presenting. And thus those inside IPs which have a static NAT, will be translated once it reaches the PIX and can not go via the VPN tunnel.
    May someone advise me how to overcome this? Thanks.

    Your question really pertains to the nat order of operations. Nat 0 (nat exemption) is first in the order. It preceeds all other including static nat. The servers you mention will absolutely be included in the nat 0 unless they are specifically denied in the nat 0 acl.

  • Dynamic PAT and Static NAT issue ASA 5515

    Hi All,
    Recently we migrated our network to ASA 5515, since we had configured nat pool overload on our existing router the users are able to translated their ip's outside. Right now my issue was when I use the existing NAT configured to our router into firewall, it seems that the translation was not successful actually I used Dynamic NAT. When I use the Dynamic PAT(Hide) all users are able to translated to the said public IP's. I know that PAT is Port address translation but when I use static nat for specific server. The Static NAT was not able to translated. Can anyone explain if there's any conflict whit PAT to Static NAT? I appriciate their response. Thanks!
    - Bhal

    Hi,
    I would have to guess that you Dynamic PAT was perhaps configured as a Section 1 rule and Static NAT configured as Section 2 rule which would mean that the Dynamic PAT rule would always override the Static NAT for the said host.
    The very basic configured for Static NAT and Default PAT I would do in the following way
    object network STATIC
    host
    nat (inside,outside) static dns
    object-group network DEFAULT-PAT-SOURCE
    network-object
    nat (inside,outside) after-auto source dynamic DEFAULT-PAT-SOURCE interface
    The Static NAT would be configured as Network Object NAT (Section 2) and the Default PAT would be configured with Twice NAT / Manual NAT (after-auto specifies it as Section 3 rule)
    This might sound confusing. Though it would be easier to say what the problem is if we saw the actual NAT configuration. Though I gave the reason that I think is probably one of the most likely reasons if there is some conflict with the 2 NAT rules
    You can also check out a NAT document I made regarding the new NAT configuration format and its operation.
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-31116
    Hope this helps
    - Jouni

  • Static NAT with port translation

    Hello All,
    I have a server running web application on 443 and now I want to publish it on Internet with static nat and just for port 443,  I am thinking that following configuration should be fine, can anyone comment on it.
      10.1.1.2:443         10.1.1.1    2.2.2.5
    Server -------------------------- ASA --------------------- Internet router --Cloud
    Config  i am planing      
    static (inside, outside) tcp 2.2.2.2 443 10.10.10.10 443 netmask 255.255.255.255
    Thanks
    JD

    Thanks Harish and Jouni,
    I am using extra Public IP, I want to now why "dns" is the end of access list? I got confuse by at ACL as we I was looking for ASA packet flow:-
    A/PIX - Outside (Lower SEC_Level) to Inside (Higher Sec_Lev)
    1. FLOW-LOOKUP - [] - Check for existing connections, if none found
    create a
    new connection.
    2. UN-NAT - [static] -
    2. ROUTE-LOOKUP - [input] - Initial Checking (Reverse Path Check, etc.)
    3. ACCESS-LIST - [log] - ACL Lookup
    4. CONN-SETTINGS - [] - class-map, policy-map, service-policy
    5. IP-OPTIONS - [] -
    6. NAT - [rpf-check] -
    7. NAT - [host-limits] -
    8. IP-OPTIONS - [] -
    9. FLOW-CREATION - [] - If everything passes up until this point a
    connection
    is created.
    10. ROUTE-LOOKUP - [output and adjacency]
    access-list OUTSIDE-IN permit tcp any host eq 443 - suggested by you
    but if i go by the flow which i come to know it should be like
    access-list OUTSIDE-IN permit tcp any host eq 443
    What is your opion ?
    Thanks
    Jagdev

  • Static NAT (in and out) and PAT on a Router

    Static NAT and PAT
    I need to have a customer network connected to my extranet.
    I’m not in control of the customer network addressing. But need to configure a VPN connection.
    I will supply the router that will also be the customer Firewall to the Internet (PAT).
    (1) I need to be able to do PAT on traffic from internal hosts to the Internet.
    (2) I need to hide (NAT) the customer network behind a network supplied by me (match-host), when they are accessing my extranet (through VPN).
    (3) I need to be able to access hosts on the customer network, through the hiding (NAT) addresses from my extranet (through VPN).
    The following configuration will solve (1) & (2), but I can not (3) reach the internal servers from my extranet, except if the internal host has made connection to the extranet, witch will create a translate entry in the NAT table.
    Extranet is: 172.16.16.0/24
    Internal net is: 192.168.1.0/24
    interface Vlan1
    ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
    ip nat inside
    interface FastEthernet4
    ip address 1.1.1.1
    ip nat outside
    access-list 175 deny 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.16.0 0.0.0.255
    access-list 175 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
    access-list 176 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.16.0 0.0.0.255
    ip nat pool FRO 10.192.10.1 10.192.10.254 netmask 255.255.255.0 type match-host
    ip nat inside source list 175 interface FastEthernet4 overload
    ip nat inside source route-map HIDE pool FRO reversible
    route-map HIDE permit 10
    match ip address 176

    Create a NAT configuration in the router which also translates even your outside Global address(your extranet) into the inside Global(any private) address through the keyword "rotary".Only this rotary pool will provide the pool of inside global IP address for yopur outside Global IP addresses.
    The following white paper will provide you with the required information,
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6640/products_white_paper09186a0080091cb9.shtml

  • Static NAT - VPN - Internet Access

    Does anyone know how to configure the following?
    1.  An static NAT from an inside ip address to another inside ip address (not physical subnet).
    2.  The traffic static Natted at the step 1 need to go into a tunnel VPN and at the same time to have internet access.
    My router just have two interfaces a WAN and a LAN.
    I just created the VPN, the static NAT and the PAT for other users of the subnet to have internet access, but the traffic static Natted just goes over the ipsec tunnel but cannot have internet access.
    I tried to apply a route map after the static nat command but since i do not have a physical interface in the same subnet were i am translating the route-map is not applied to the static nat command.
    in an extract:
    LAN traffic (specific server) --->> static nat to inside not real subnet --->> traffic goes over Tunnel (OK), but no internet access.
    BTW.  I need to configure the nat before de ipsec tunnel because both lan subnets of the ipsec tunnel endpoint are the same.

    Why do you need an inside host to be natted to another inside IP address?
    You need to configure a "no nat" policy, for the internet traffic.

  • Prime Infrastructure (2.0) utilization report on port group possible?

    Hello
    I want to create an interface utilization report for a specific port group in PI, but can't see how to do that in the report setting. You only seem to be able to select a specific device or site rather than port group. Is it possible? Also, is it possible to put that on a dashlet?
    thanks for your help

    Thanks for that Mahavir
    Yes, I worked that out a little while ago, and can now see interface utilization by port group on the Performance > Network Interface page. I do have another question however (well two)....
    I wanted to add graph over time for the utilization to the detail dashboard, but nothing shows up, even though I see the utilization in the network interface page, so I'm sure the monitoring is deployed. Why is the data missing from the graphs?
    Also, I wanted to see interface packets per second graphs, but see that is not part of any default template, so I created a customer SNMP template from the IF-MIB to do this, but I can only deploy that against sites/devices or a list of interfaces, and not port groups. Why can't I deploy a customer SNMP template against a port group?
    thanks for your help

  • Prime 2.2 : Deploy template to port group

    Dear Cisco guys,
    We managed to make a port group, we managed to make a template, but how do you couple both ?
    For example : Change description on fa0/1 & fa0/2 in switchA ?
    Many thanks,
    Lieven Stubbe
    Belgian railways

    Thanks for that Mahavir
    Yes, I worked that out a little while ago, and can now see interface utilization by port group on the Performance > Network Interface page. I do have another question however (well two)....
    I wanted to add graph over time for the utilization to the detail dashboard, but nothing shows up, even though I see the utilization in the network interface page, so I'm sure the monitoring is deployed. Why is the data missing from the graphs?
    Also, I wanted to see interface packets per second graphs, but see that is not part of any default template, so I created a customer SNMP template from the IF-MIB to do this, but I can only deploy that against sites/devices or a list of interfaces, and not port groups. Why can't I deploy a customer SNMP template against a port group?
    thanks for your help

  • Service group, Destinations and Logical ports

    I suppose that Service Group, Destinations and Logical ports
    can be used to consumer a service in a specific system/landscape.
    Is it correct ?
    But when I use one or another ?
    What are the differences ?

    Hi
    Service Group :identify a service provider.
    Destinations and Logical ports  : are the stuff which is required to setup the connections with the agrred service provider.
    For example : As you how SOA is working , first we have to look for services once we found the required one or informed by the vendor itself , they will provide the credentials (this is something which contain port ,destination and password etc), once setup is complete we get the seamless services from its provider.
    These thing are not seperate so donesnt make sence to use one or another .
    BR
    Satish Kumar

Maybe you are looking for